General emotion regulation measure (GERM): Individual differences in motives of trying to experience and trying to avoid experiencing positive and negative emotions

Cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Patient-weighted Quality of Life in Epilepsy 31 Inventory (QOLIE-31P) in Argentina

OBJECTIVE

This study presents the cultural and linguistic adaptation and psychometric properties of the Argentine version of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31P) scale.

METHODS

An instrumental study was carried out. A version of QOLIE-31P translated into Spanish was provided by the original authors. To assess the content validity, evaluation of expert judges was requested, and the degree of agreement was determined. The instrument was administered to 212 people with epilepsy (PWE) of Argentina, together with the BDI-II, B-IPQ and a sociodemographic questionnaire. A descriptive analysis of the sample was carried out. Discriminative capacity of the items was performed. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess reliability. To study the dimensional structure of the instrument, a confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) was performed. Convergent and discriminant validity was tested through mean difference tests, linear correlation, and regression analysis.

RESULTS

Aiken's V coefficients ranged between .90 and 1 (acceptable), which allows to state that a conceptually and linguistically equivalent version of the QOLIE-31P was reached. Cronbach's Alpha of 0.94 was obtained for the Total Scale (optimal). As a result of CFA, 7 factors were obtained, being the dimensional structure similar to the original version. Also, unemployed PWE reported significant lower scores than employed PWE. Finally, QOLIE-31P scores negatively correlated with depression symptom severity and negative illness perception.

CONCLUSION

The Argentine version of the QOLIE-31P is a valid and reliable instrument, presenting good psychometric properties, such as high internal consistency and a dimensional structure similar to that of the original version.

Basic Empathy Scale: A Systematic Review and Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis

The Basic Empathy Scale (BES) has been internationally used to measure empathy. A systematic review including 74 articles that implement the instrument since its development in 2006 was carried out. Moreover, an evidence validity analysis and a reliability generalization meta-analysis were performed to examine if the scale presented the appropriate values to justify its application. Results from the systematic review showed that the use of the BES is increasing, although the research areas in which it is being implemented are currently being broadened. The validity analyses indicated that both the type of factor analysis and reliability are reported in validation studies much more than the consequences of testing are. Regarding the meta-analysis results, the mean of Cronbach's α for cognitive empathy was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85), with high levels of heterogeneity (I2 = 98.81%). Regarding affective empathy, the mean of Cronbach's α was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.84), with high levels of heterogeneity. It was concluded that BES is appropriate to be used in general population groups, although not recommended for clinical diagnosis; and there is a moderate to high heterogeneity in the mean of Cronbach's α. The practical implications of the results in mean estimation and heterogeneity are discussed.