1
|
Grisham C, Peshkin BN, Sorgen L, Isaacs C, Ladd MK, Jacobs A, Binion S, Tynan M, Kuchinsky E, Friedman S, Taylor KL, Graves K, O'Neill S, Kim D, Schwartz MD. Streamlined Genetic Education and Cascade Testing in Men from Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer Families: A Randomized Trial. Public Health Genomics 2024; 27:100-109. [PMID: 39173603 PMCID: PMC11407795 DOI: 10.1159/000540466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION When a pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation is identified in a family, cascade genetic testing of family members is recommended since the results may inform screening or treatment decisions in men and women. However, rates of cascade testing are low, and men are considerably less likely than women to pursue cascade testing. To facilitate cascade testing in men, we designed a Web-based genetic education tool that addressed barriers to cascade testing, was individually tailored, delivered proactively, and could be used in lieu of pretest genetic counseling to streamline the cascade testing process. METHODS We randomized 63 untested men from hereditary cancer families to Web-based genetic education (WGE) versus enhanced usual care (EUC). WGE participants were provided access to a genetic education website after which they could accept or decline genetic testing or opt for pretest genetic counseling. EUC participants received an informational brochure and a letter informing them of their eligibility for genetic testing and recommending they schedule genetic counseling. The primary outcome was the uptake of genetic testing. RESULTS Men in the WGE group were more likely to complete genetic counseling and/or genetic testing (43% vs. 12.1%; χ2 [n = 63, df = 1] = 7.77, p = 0.005). WGE participants were also more likely to complete genetic testing compared to men in the EUC group (30% vs. 9.1%; χ2 [n = 63, df = 1] = 4.46, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION This preliminary trial suggests that a streamlined approach to genetic testing using proactively delivered genetic education may reduce barriers to cascade testing for at-risk men, leading to increased uptake. These results should be interpreted cautiously given the select sample and high rate of non-response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Grisham
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Beth N Peshkin
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Lia Sorgen
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Mary Kathleen Ladd
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Aryana Jacobs
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Savannah Binion
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Mara Tynan
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | | | - Susan Friedman
- FORCE: Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kathryn L Taylor
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Kristi Graves
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Suzanne O'Neill
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - David Kim
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Afaya A, Kim SW, Park HS, Lim MC, Jung MS, Nam EJ, Park JS, Jeong J, Ryu JM, Kim J, Kim J, Kim M, Jin J, Han J, Kim SY, Park SY, Katapodi MC, Kim S. Psychosocial barriers and facilitators for cascade genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a scoping review. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:121-132. [PMID: 38662264 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00379-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Despite increased awareness and availability of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome for over 20 years, there is still significant underuse of cascade genetic testing among at-risk relatives. This scoping review synthesized evidence regarding psychosocial barriers and facilitators of family communication and/or uptake of cascade genetic testing in relatives from HBOC families. Search terms included 'hereditary breast and ovarian cancer' and 'cascade genetic testing' for studies published from 2012-2022. Through searching common databases, and manual search of references, 480 studies were identified after excluding duplications. Each article was reviewed by two researchers independently and 20 studies were included in the final analysis. CASP, RoBANS 2.0, RoB 2.0, and MMAT were used to assess the quality of included studies. A convergent data synthesis method was used to integrate evidence from quantitative and narrative data into categories and subcategories. Evidence points to 3 categories and 12 subcategories of psychosocial barriers and facilitators for cascade testing: (1) facilitators (belief in health protection and prevention; family closeness; decisional empowerment; family support, sense of responsibility; self-efficacy; supportive health professionals); (2) bidirectional concepts (information; perception of genetic/cancer consequences; negative emotions and attitude); and (3) barriers (negative reactions from family and negative family dynamics). Healthcare providers need to systematically evaluate these psychosocial factors, strengthen facilitators and alleviate barriers to promote informed decision-making for communication of genetic test results and uptake of genetic testing. Bidirectional factors merit special consideration and tailored approaches, as they can potentially have a positive or negative influence on family communication and uptake of genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agani Afaya
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Department of Breast Surgery, Breast Care Center, Dairim St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Seok Park
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Division of Tumor Immunology, Center for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Mi Sook Jung
- College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eun Ji Nam
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Soo Park
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jai Min Ryu
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - JiSun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihye Kim
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Juhye Jin
- Department of Nursing, Korea National University of Transportation, Jeungpyeong, Korea
| | - Jeehee Han
- Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Yeon Kim
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
- Korea Armed Forces Nursing Academy, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Park
- College of Nursing, Daegu Catholic University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Maria C Katapodi
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sue Kim
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cohen SA, Nixon DM. Evaluating attributes of a collaborative model of service delivery for hereditary cancer risk assessment. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:291-300. [PMID: 37183788 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this nonrandomized study was to compare several attributes of hereditary cancer risk assessment using a collaborative model of service delivery. Arm 1 included patients seen in-person by a board-certified genetic counselor (CGC), Arm 2 included high-complexity triaged patients from distant sites who received telegenetics with a CGC, and Arm 3 included low-complexity triaged patients from distant sites who had in-person risk assessment with a locally placed genetic counselor extender (GCE). A total of 152 patients consented and 98 had complete data available for analysis (35 in Arm 1, 33 in Arm 2, and 30 in Arm 3). The three groups were comparable in age, ethnicity, education, employment, and cancer status. There was no significant difference in median wait time or distance traveled to receive care across all three arms. However, if patients in Arms 2 and 3 had to access the CGC in-person, they would have had to travel significantly further (p < 0.0001). The time spent in a session was significantly longer in Arm 3 with a GCE than with a CGC in-person or by telegenetics (p < 0.01). There was no difference in the number of essential elements covered in the appointment, change in cancer worry, or appointment satisfaction across all three arms, although the sample size was small. Employing a collaborative model of service delivery with GCEs and telegenetics is feasible, satisfactory to patients and reduces the distance patients travel to access hereditary cancer genetic services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Cohen
- Ascension St. Vincent, Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment Program, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Dawn M Nixon
- Ascension St. Vincent, Cancer Genetics Risk Assessment Program, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Loeb S, Keith SW, Cheng HH, Leader AE, Gross L, Sanchez Nolasco T, Byrne N, Hartman R, Brown LH, Pieczonka CM, Gomella LG, Kelly WK, Lallas CD, Handley N, Mille PJ, Mark JR, Brown GA, Chopra S, McClellan A, Wise DR, Hollifield L, Giri VN. TARGET: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial of a Pretest, Patient-Driven Genetic Education Webtool Versus Genetic Counseling for Prostate Cancer Germline Testing. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300552. [PMID: 38452310 PMCID: PMC10939575 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline genetic testing (GT) is important for prostate cancer (PCA) management, clinical trial eligibility, and hereditary cancer risk. However, GT is underutilized and there is a shortage of genetic counselors. To address these gaps, a patient-driven, pretest genetic education webtool was designed and studied compared with traditional genetic counseling (GC) to inform strategies for expanding access to genetic services. METHODS Technology-enhanced acceleration of germline evaluation for therapy (TARGET) was a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04447703) comparing a nine-module patient-driven genetic education webtool versus pretest GC. Participants completed surveys measuring decisional conflict, satisfaction, and attitudes toward GT at baseline, after pretest education/counseling, and after GT result disclosure. The primary end point was noninferiority in reducing decisional conflict between webtool and GC using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale. Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to compare decisional conflict between groups. Participants opting for GT received a 51-gene panel, with results delivered to participants and their providers. RESULTS The analytic data set includes primary outcome data from 315 participants (GC [n = 162] and webtool [n = 153]). Mean difference in decisional conflict score changes between groups was -0.04 (one-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 2.54; P = .01), suggesting the patient-driven webtool was noninferior to GC. Overall, 145 (89.5%) GC and 120 (78.4%) in the webtool arm underwent GT, with pathogenic variants in 15.8% (8.7% in PCA genes). Satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms; knowledge of cancer genetics was higher but attitudes toward GT were less favorable in the webtool arm. CONCLUSION The results of the TARGET study support the use of patient-driven digital webtools for expanding access to pretest genetic education for PCA GT. Further studies to optimize patient experience and evaluate them in diverse patient populations are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Scott W. Keith
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Amy E. Leader
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Laura Gross
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
- Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Nataliya Byrne
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Rebecca Hartman
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William Kevin Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nathan Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Integrative Medicine and Nutritional Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - David R. Wise
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Veda N. Giri
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Binion S, Sorgen LJ, Peshkin BN, Valdimarsdottir H, Isaacs C, Nusbaum R, Graves KD, DeMarco T, Wood M, McKinnon W, Garber J, McCormick S, Ladd MK, Schwartz MD. Telephone versus in-person genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk: Patient predictors of differential outcomes. J Telemed Telecare 2024; 30:334-343. [PMID: 34779303 PMCID: PMC9902210 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x211052220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Telegenetics has become the predominant mode of cancer genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to identify potential patient-level contraindicators for telegenetic genetic counseling. METHODS We analyzed post-counseling (pre-result disclosure) follow-up data from a randomized noninferiority trial of a telephone genetic counseling versus usual care genetic counseling. Among 669 randomized participants, 600 completed pre-test counseling and 568 completed a 2-week follow-up assessment before receiving test results. In this analysis, we focused on genetic counseling outcomes (knowledge, decisional conflict, and distress). In multivariate models controlling for bivariate predictors of these outcomes, we tested our a priori hypotheses that pre-counseling numeracy, perceived stress, and race/ethnicity would moderate the outcomes of telephone genetic counseling versus usual care. RESULTS Only numeracy significantly moderated associations between mode of genetic counseling and outcomes. Higher numeracy was associated with higher post-counseling knowledge following telephone genetic counseling (p < 0.001), but not usual care (p = 0.450). Higher numeracy was also associated with lower distress following telephone genetic counseling (p = 0.009) but not usual care (p = 0.16). Neither perceived stress nor race/ethnicity exhibited differential impacts on telephone genetic counseling versus usual care (ps > 0.20). CONCLUSION Although high numeracy was associated with higher levels of knowledge following telegenetic counseling, we did not identify any clinically significant patient-level contraindicators for telegenetic counseling. These results lend further confidence to the broad use of telegenetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savannah Binion
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Lia J. Sorgen
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Beth N. Peshkin
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Heiddis Valdimarsdottir
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
- Department of Psychology, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Rachel Nusbaum
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Current Affiliation: University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kristi D. Graves
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Tiffani DeMarco
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Current Affiliation: Cancer Genetic Counseling Program, Inova Translational Medicine Institute, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA
| | - Marie Wood
- Familial Cancer Program of the Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Wendy McKinnon
- Familial Cancer Program of the Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Judy Garber
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shelley McCormick
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Cancer Risk Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Mary K. Ladd
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Marc D. Schwartz
- Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yoo B, Kim A, Moon HS, So MK, Jeong TD, Lee KE, Moon BI, Huh J. Evaluation of Group Genetic Counseling Sessions via a Metaverse-based Application. Ann Lab Med 2024; 44:82-91. [PMID: 37665289 PMCID: PMC10485865 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2024.44.1.82] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Group genetic counseling has been implemented to meet growing demand. A metaverse platform, in which a society is built and activities are carried out in the virtual world, has not yet been implemented in group genetic counseling. We investigated whether a metaverse platform could be an alternative service-delivery model for group genetic counseling. Methods Participants (N=131) were divided into three groups: patient (N=45), family (N= 43), and interested (N=43) groups. Participants entered the metaverse through a link sent to their mobile phones and attended a 20-min group genetic counseling session reviewing hereditary breast cancer, followed by a 10-min question-and-answer period. Results The overall median score of post-educational knowledge (9.0, range 8.0-10.0) significantly increased compared to that of pre-educational knowledge (6.0, range 3.0-8.0) (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the pre- and post-educational knowledge scores among the three groups (P>0.05). Most participants (95%) responded that their understanding of hereditary breast cancer had increased after the group genetic counseling session and that their satisfaction was high. The main advantage noted with metaverse was no limit of space and location while attending the session (97%), and the main disadvantage was a possibility of missing content due to an unstable internet connection (67%). Conclusions The metaverse platform would be acceptable as an alternative group genetic counseling service. More studies are needed to investigate how, for whom, and in what circumstances metaverse can be effectively utilized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boeun Yoo
- Department of Genetic Counseling, College of Medicine Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Center for Women, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Arang Kim
- Department of Genetic Counseling, College of Medicine Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Pediatrics Molecular Genetics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hye Sung Moon
- Cancer Center for Women, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min-Kyung So
- Department of Genetic Counseling, College of Medicine Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Dong Jeong
- Department of Genetic Counseling, College of Medicine Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoung Eun Lee
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-In Moon
- Cancer Center for Women, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jungwon Huh
- Department of Genetic Counseling, College of Medicine Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meshkani Z, Moradi N, Aboutorabi A, Jafari A, Shams R. Subjective valuation of Iranian women for screening for gene-related diseases: a case of breast cancer. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:667. [PMID: 37041634 PMCID: PMC10088156 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15568-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About 5-10% of breast cancer cases are attributed to a gene mutation. To perform preventive interventions for women with a gene mutation, genetic screening BRCA tests have recently been implemented in Iran. The present study aimed to determine Iranian women's subjective valuation for screening BRCA tests for early detection of breast cancer to help policymakers to make decisions about genetic screening tests for breast cancer and to know the applicants. METHODS An online survey was completed by women older than 30 years old in Tehran, the capital of Iran in 2021. A hypothetical scenario about genetic screening tests for breast cancer was defined. The subjective valuation for the tests was assessed by a willingness to pay (WTP) using the contingent valuation method (CVM) by payment card. Demographics, history of breast cancers, knowledge, and physiological variables were considered as independent variables, and a logistic regression model assessed the relationship between WTP and the variables. RESULTS 660 women were included. 88% of participants intended to participate in BRCA genetic screening for breast cancer if it were free. The mean WTP for the tests was about $ 20. Based on the logistic regression, income, family history of breast or ovarian cancer, and positive attitude were associated with WTP. CONCLUSIONS Iranian women were willing to intend for genetic screening BRCA tests and pay for them as well. The result of the present study is of great importance for policy makers when it comes to funding and determining co-payments for BRCA genetic screening tests. To achieve a high participation rate of women in breast cancer screening plans, a positive attitude should be promoted as a psychological factor. Educational and informative programs can help.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Meshkani
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Science, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Najmeh Moradi
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
| | - Ali Aboutorabi
- Department of Health Economics, School of Health Management and Information Science, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abdosaleh Jafari
- Health Human Resources Research Center, School of health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Roshanak Shams
- Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Burns C, Yeates L, Sweeting J, Semsarian C, Ingles J. Evaluating a communication aid for return of genetic results in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A randomized controlled trial. J Genet Couns 2023; 32:425-434. [PMID: 36385718 PMCID: PMC10946474 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is considered a key aspect of management. Communication of genetic test results to the proband and their family members, can be a barrier to effective uptake. We hypothesized that a communication aid would facilitate effective communication, and sought to evaluate knowledge and communication of HCM risk to at-risk relatives. This was a prospective randomized controlled trial. Consecutive HCM patients attending a specialized clinic, who agreed to participate, were randomized to the intervention or current clinical practice. The intervention consisted of a genetic counselor-led appointment, separate to their clinical cardiology review, and guided by a communication booklet which could be written in and taken home. Current clinical practice was defined as the return of the genetic result by a genetic counselor and cardiologist, often as part of a clinical cardiology review. The primary outcome was the ability and confidence of the individual to communicate genetic results to at-risk relatives. The a priori outcome of improved communication among HCM families did not show statistically significant differences between the control and intervention group, though the majority of probands in the intervention group achieved fair communication (n = 13/22) and had higher genetic knowledge scores than those in the control group (7 ± 3 versus 6 ± 3). A total of 29% of at-risk relatives were not informed of a genetic result in their family. Communication among HCM families remains challenging, with nearly a third of at-risk relatives not informed of a genetic result. We show a significant gap in the current approach to supporting family communication about genetics. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000706370.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Burns
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary InstituteThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Department of CardiologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyAustralia
| | - Laura Yeates
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary InstituteThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Department of CardiologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyAustralia
| | - Joanna Sweeting
- Cardio Genomics Program at Centenary InstituteThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Christopher Semsarian
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary InstituteThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Department of CardiologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyAustralia
| | - Jodie Ingles
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Department of CardiologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyAustralia
- Cardio Genomics Program at Centenary InstituteThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang W, Jacobson S. Effects of health misinformation on misbeliefs: understanding the moderating roles of different types of knowledge. JOURNAL OF INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & ETHICS IN SOCIETY 2022. [DOI: 10.1108/jices-02-2022-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose
Health misinformation poses severe risks to people’s health decisions and outcomes. A great deal of research in this area has focused on debunking misinformation and found limited effects of correctives after misinformation exposure. The research on prebunking strategies has been inadequate. Most has focused on forewarning and enhancing literacy skills and knowledge to recognize misinformation. Part of the reason for the inadequacy could be due to the challenges in conceptualizing and measuring knowledge. This study intends to fill this gap and examines various types of knowledge, including subjective knowledge, cancer literacy, persuasion knowledge and media literacy. This study aims to understand how knowledge may moderate the effect of misinformation exposure on misbeliefs.
Design/methodology/approach
An online experiment with a basic experimental design (misinformation exposure: health misinformation vs factual health message) was conducted. The authors measured and tested the moderating role of different types of knowledge (subjective knowledge, cancer literacy, persuasion knowledge and media literacy) separately to improve the understanding of their role in combatting online health misinformation.
Findings
This study found that a higher level of cancer literacy and persuasion knowledge helped people identify misinformation and prevented them from being persuaded by it. A higher level of subjective knowledge, however, reduced the recognition of misinformation, thereby increasing the likelihood of being persuaded by it. Media literacy did not moderate the mediation path.
Originality/value
This study differentiates the role different types of knowledge may have played in moderating the influence of health misinformation. It contributes to a strategic development of interventions that better prepare people against the influence of health misinformation.
Collapse
|
10
|
Park JS, Shin S, Lee YJ, Lee ST, Nam EJ, Han JW, Lee SH, Kim TI, Park HS. Implication and Influence of Multigene Panel Testing with Genetic Counseling in Korean Patients with BRCA1/2 Mutation-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2022; 54:1099-1110. [PMID: 34793666 PMCID: PMC9582472 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2021.978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical implication of multigene panel testing of beyond BRCA genes in Korean patients with BRCA1/2 mutation-negative breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 700 BRCA1/2 mutation-negative breast cancer patients received comprehensive multigene panel testing and genetic counseling. Among them, 347 patients completed a questionnaire about cancer worry, genetic knowledge, and preference for the method of genetic tests during pre- and post-genetic test counseling. The frequency of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPV) were analyzed. RESULTS At least one PV/LPV of 26 genes was found in 76 out of 700 patients (10.9 %). The rate for PV/LPV was 3.4% for high-risk genes (17 PALB2, 6 TP53, and 1 PTEN). PV/LPVs of clinical actionable genes for breast cancer management, high-risk genes and other moderate-risk genes such as ATM, BARD1, BRIP, CHEK2, NF1, and RAD51D, were observed in 7.4%. Patients who completed the questionnaire showed decreased concerns about the risk of additional cancer development (average score, 4.21 to 3.94; p < 0.001), influence on mood (3.27 to 3.13; p < 0.001), influence on daily functioning (3.03 to 2.94; p=0.006); and increased knowledge about hereditary cancer syndrome (66.9 to 68.8; p=0.025) in post-test genetic counseling. High cancer worry scales (CWSs) were associated with age ≤ 40 years and the identification of PV/LPV. Low CWSs were related to the satisfaction of the counselee. CONCLUSION Comprehensive multigene panel test with genetic counseling is clinically applicable. It should be based on interpretable genetic information, consideration of potential psychological consequences, and proper preventive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Soo Park
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Saeam Shin
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Yoon Jung Lee
- Division of Nursing, Severance Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Seung-Tae Lee
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Eun Ji Nam
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women’s Life Medical Science, Women’s Cancer Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Jung Woo Han
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Sun Hwa Lee
- Division of Nursing, Severance Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Tae Il Kim
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hyung Seok Park
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Loeb S, Cheng HH, Leader A, Gross L, Nolasco TS, Byrne N, Wise DR, Hollifield L, Brown LH, Slater E, Pieczonka C, Gomella LG, Kelly WK, Trabulsi EJ, Handley N, Lallas CD, Chandrasekar T, Mille P, Mann M, Mark JR, Brown G, Chopra S, Wasserman J, Phillips J, Somers P, Giri VN. Technology-enhanced AcceleRation of Germline Evaluation for Therapy (TARGET): A randomized controlled trial of a pretest patient-driven webtool vs. genetic counseling for prostate cancer germline testing. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 119:106821. [PMID: 35710085 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline testing has an increasingly important role in prostate cancer care. However, a relative shortage of genetic counselors necessitates alternate strategies for delivery of pre-test education for germline testing. This study, funded by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, seeks to address the need for novel methods of delivery of pre-test germline education beyond traditional germline counseling to facilitate informed patient decision-making for germline testing. METHODS This is a two-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a target enrollment of 173 participants with prostate cancer per study arm (total anticipated n = 346). Patients who meet criteria for germline testing based on tumor features, family history or Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry are being recruited from 5 US sites including academic, private practice and Veterans healthcare settings. Consenting participants are randomized to the interactive pretest webtool or germline counseling with assessment of key patient-reported outcomes involved in informed decision-making for germline germline testing. RESULTS Participants complete surveys at baseline, after pretest education/counseling, and following disclosure of germline germline results. The primary outcome of the study is decisional conflict for germline testing. Secondary outcomes include germline knowledge, satisfaction, uptake of germline testing, and understanding of results. CONCLUSION Our hypothesis is that the web-based germline education tool is non-inferior to traditional germline counseling regarding key patient-reported outcomes involved in informed decision-making for germline testing. If proven, the results would support deploying the webtool across various practice settings to facilitate pre-test germlines education for individuals with prostate cancer and developing collaborative care strategies with germline counseling. CLINICALTRIALS gov Identifier: NCT04447703.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Loeb
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Manhattan Veteran Affairs, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Heather H Cheng
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Amy Leader
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Laura Gross
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Germlines, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Manhattan Veteran Affairs, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Nataliya Byrne
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America; Manhattan Veteran Affairs, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - David R Wise
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Lucas Hollifield
- NYU-Langone Health and NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Lauren H Brown
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Elias Slater
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, United States of America
| | | | - Leonard G Gomella
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - William K Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Edouard J Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Nathan Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Costas D Lallas
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Patrick Mille
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Mark Mann
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Gordon Brown
- New Jersey Urology, Voorhees, NJ, United States of America
| | - Sameer Chopra
- New Jersey Urology, Voorhees, NJ, United States of America
| | - Jenna Wasserman
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Jade Phillips
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Patrick Somers
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Veda N Giri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Germlines, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Blomen CL, Pott A, Volk AE, Budäus L, Witzel I. Communication processes about predictive genetic testing within high-risk breast cancer families: a two-phase study design. Sci Rep 2021; 11:20178. [PMID: 34635688 PMCID: PMC8505562 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98737-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The detection of a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene has medical and psychological consequences for both, affected mutation carriers and their relatives. A two-phase study with explanatory sequential mixed methods design examined the psychological impact of genetic testing and associated family communication processes. Analyzing a survey data of 79 carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, the majority had general psychological distress independent of cancer diagnosis in the patients' history. The point prevalence of depression was 16.9%. Contrary to their subjective perception, the respondents' knowledge about those mutations was moderate. Despite the high rate of information transfer to relatives at risk (100%), their reported uptake of genetic testing was low (45.6%). Communication about the mutation detection was more frequent with female than with male relatives. In-depth focus group interviews revealed significant barriers to accessing genetic counseling including anxiety, uncertainty about the benefits of testing and about the own cancer risk, particularly among males. This study suggests that an adequate knowledge of the genetic background and psychological support is required to reduce emotional distress, to support familial communication and to facilitate genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara L Blomen
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Aliaksandra Pott
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander E Volk
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Budäus
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Russo J, McDougall C, Bowler N, Shimada A, Gross L, Hyatt C, Kelly WK, Calvaresi A, Handley NR, Hirsch IH, Izes JK, Lallas CD, Mann M, Mark JR, Mille PJ, Preate D, Trabulsi EJ, Tsang M, Chandrasekar T, Weiner PR, Gomella LG, Giri VN. Pretest Genetic Education Video Versus Genetic Counseling for Men Considering Prostate Cancer Germline Testing: A Patient-Choice Study to Address Urgent Practice Needs. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:PO.21.00238. [PMID: 34589662 PMCID: PMC8462590 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) for prostate cancer (PCA) is now central to treatment and hereditary cancer assessment. With rising demand for and shortage of genetic counseling (GC), tools to deliver pretest informed consent across practice settings are needed to improve access to GT and precision care. Here, we report on Evaluation and Management for Prostate Oncology, Wellness, and Risk (EMPOWER), a patient-choice study for pretest video-based genetic education (VBGE) versus GC to inform urgent practice needs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with PCA or at risk for PCA (family history of PCA) were eligible and could choose pretest VBGE or GC. Outcomes included decisional conflict for GT, change in genetics knowledge, satisfaction, and intention to share results with family and/or providers. Descriptive statistics summarized results with counts and percentages for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Data were compared with Fisher's exact, chi-squared, or Wilcoxon two-sample tests. Mean change in genetics knowledge was compared with t tests. The significance level was set a priori at .05. RESULTS Data on the first 127 participants were analyzed. Characteristics were White (85.8%), bachelor's degree (66.9%), and PCA diagnosis (90.6%). The majority chose VBGE (71%) versus GC (29%; P < .001). No differences were observed in decisional conflict for GT or satisfaction. Cancer genetics knowledge improved in both groups without significant difference (+0.9 VBGE, +1.8 GC, P = .056). Men who chose VBGE had higher intention to share GT results (96.4% VBGE v 86.4% GC, P = .02). Both groups had high rates of GT uptake (VBGE 94.4%, GC 92%). CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of men opted for pretest VBGE, with comparable patient-reported outcomes and uptake of GT. The results support the use of pretest video to address the critical GC shortage in the precision era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Russo
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Carey McDougall
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nicholas Bowler
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ayako Shimada
- Biostatistics Facility, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Laura Gross
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Colette Hyatt
- University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT
| | - William K. Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anne Calvaresi
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nathan R. Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Irvin H. Hirsch
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joseph K. Izes
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark Mann
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Patrick J. Mille
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Miranda Tsang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Perry R. Weiner
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Veda N. Giri
- Cancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wong B, Lucente D, Krivensky S, Krahn E, Karlawish J, Dickerson BC. Knowledge assessment and psychological impact of genetic counseling in people at risk for familial FTD. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2021; 13:e12225. [PMID: 34337135 PMCID: PMC8319661 DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The decision to undergo genetic testing for familial frontotemporal dementia (fFTD) is challenging and complex. When counseling individuals, clinicians need to know what individuals understand about the type of fFTD for which they may be at elevated risk. Unfortunately, no tools to measure understanding of fFTD exist, and no study has investigated knowledge gain from fFTD genetic counseling. METHODS Before and after genetic counseling, 42 asymptomatic individuals from fFTD families completed the newly developed fFTD Knowledge Assessment and Psychological Impact Questionnaire (fFTD KAPI-Q), along with affect and mood questionnaires. RESULTS Genetic counseling resulted in substantial knowledge gain on the fFTD KAPI-Q (average gain = 40%); those with lower pre-counseling scores gained the most. Negative affect diminished by 11%. Individuals who gained the greatest knowledge demonstrated the greatest reduction in negative affect. CONCLUSIONS Genetic counseling was effective regardless of level of baseline knowledge and has an immediate ameliorative impact on negative affect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie Wong
- Departments of Neurology and PsychiatryFrontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Diane Lucente
- Departments of Neurology and PsychiatryFrontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Center for Genomic MedicineMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Samantha Krivensky
- Departments of Neurology and PsychiatryFrontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Erin Krahn
- Departments of Neurology and PsychiatryFrontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Jason Karlawish
- Penn Memory Center & Division of GeriatricsDepartments of MedicineMedical Ethics and Health Policyand NeurologyPerelman School of MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Bradford C. Dickerson
- Departments of Neurology and PsychiatryFrontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cousens NE, Tiller J, Meiser B, Barlow-Stewart K, Rowley S, Ko YA, Mahale S, Campbell IG, Kaur R, Bankier A, Burnett L, Jacobs C, James PA, Trainer A, Neil S, Delatycki MB, Andrews L. Evaluation of two population screening programmes for BRCA1/2 founder mutations in the Australian Jewish community: a protocol paper. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e041186. [PMID: 34172541 PMCID: PMC8237737 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People of Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry are more likely than unselected populations to have a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant, which cause a significantly increased risk of breast, ovarian and prostate cancer. Three specific BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants, referred to as BRCA-Jewish founder mutations (B-JFM), account for >90% of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in people of AJ ancestry. Current practice of identifying eligible individuals for BRCA testing based on personal and/or family history has been shown to miss at least 50% of people who have one of these variants. Here we describe the protocol of the JeneScreen study-a study established to develop and evaluate two different population-based B-JFM screening programmes, offered to people of Jewish ancestry in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS To rmeasure the acceptability of population-based B-JFM screening in Australia, two screening programmes using different methodologies have been developed. The Sydney JeneScreen programme provides information and obtains informed consent by way of an online tool. The Melbourne JeneScreen programme does this by way of community sessions attended in person. Participants complete questionnaires to measure clinical and psychosocial outcomes at baseline, and for those who have testing, 2 weeks postresult. Participants who decline testing are sent a questionnaire regarding reasons for declining. Participants with a B-JFM are sent questionnaires 12-month and 24-month post-testing. The questionnaires incorporate validated scales, which measure anxiety, decisional conflict and regret, and test-related distress and positive experiences, and other items specifically developed or adapted for the study. These measures will be assessed for each programme and the two population-based B-JFM screening methods will be compared. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Institutional Human Research Ethics Committee approval was obtained from the South Eastern Area Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee: HREC Ref 16/125.Following the analysis of the study results, the findings will be disseminated widely through conferences and publications, and directly to participants in writing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole E Cousens
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital Cancer Services, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- UNSW Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Tiller
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services Ltd, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- UNSW Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Simone Rowley
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yi-An Ko
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sakshi Mahale
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian G Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- Medical Education Office, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Agnes Bankier
- The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leslie Burnett
- Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Jacobs
- University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison Trainer
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Suzanne Neil
- Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin B Delatycki
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services Ltd, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lesley Andrews
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital Cancer Services, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- UNSW Prince of Wales Clinical School, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ding H, Sutton AL, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Sheppard VB. The role of psychosocial factors in Black women's self-efficacy in receiving genetic counseling and testing. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:1719-1726. [PMID: 34085362 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Higher self-efficacy in receiving genetic counseling and testing (GCT) has been associated with greater participation in GCT for women at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), but little is known about correlates of self-efficacy in Black women eligible for GCT. The goal of this secondary analysis was to identify sociodemographic and psychosocial factors regarding GCT. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between self-efficacy and correlates of interest. Of the 100 Black women surveyed, most women had a college degree (64%), were employed (84%), and had health insurance (93%). In the multivariable model, greater self-efficacy was associated with more positive attitudes toward GCT (Β = 0.126; CI = 0.01 to 0.25; p = 0.039), greater confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) (Β = 0.250; CI = 0.04 to 0.46; p = 0.019), and lower ratings of perceived difficulty obtaining GCT (Β = -0.219; CI = -0.46 to -0.10; p = 0.003). Community-level interventions to promote self-efficacy are needed that address perceived barriers to GCT, with the goals of increasing GINA Law awareness in the general public, increasing accessibility to genetic counseling (e.g., telemedicine), and promoting more positive attitudes about GCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanghe Ding
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Arnethea L Sutton
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.,Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Oh JM, Kim Y, Kwak Y. Factors influencing posttraumatic growth in ovarian cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:2037-2045. [PMID: 32851485 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05704-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine posttraumatic growth (PTG), cancer coping, posttraumatic stress, and genetics knowledge among ovarian cancer survivors and to identify factors affecting PTG. METHODS This cross-sectional study included 148 outpatient ovarian cancer survivors at a cancer center. Data were collected between February 25 and April 11, 2019, and were analyzed using t tests, ANOVA, Pearson-correlations, and multiple regression. RESULTS On average, the ovarian cancer survivors scored 68.09 ± 20.17 in PTG, 59.75 ± 13.37 in cancer coping, 29.30 ± 17.25 in posttraumatic stress, and 9.42 ± 3.33 in genetics knowledge. There were significant differences in PTG according to religion (t = - 2.92, p = .004), marital status (F = 3.06, p = .050), and family history of cancer (t = 2.00, p = .047). In the final analysis, the statistically significant factors influencing PTG were religion (β = .170, p = .004) and cancer coping (β = .691, p < .001), and posttraumatic stress had borderline statistical significance (β = - .107, p < .068). These factors explained 52.2% of the variance in PTG. CONCLUSIONS Ovarian cancer survivors showed a moderate level of genetics knowledge while having a high risk for posttraumatic stress. Overall, this study showed that cancer coping was a powerful factor that influenced PTG in ovarian cancer survivors. Religion was found to positively affect PTG, and posttraumatic stress had a small negative effect. Spiritual nursing interventions and improving cancer coping while reducing posttraumatic stress are necessary to increase the PTG of ovarian cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Min Oh
- Department of Nursing, National Cancer Center, Graduate School of Nursing and Health Professions, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoonjung Kim
- Faculty of Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjack-Gu, Seoul, 156-756, Republic of Korea.
| | - Yeunhee Kwak
- Faculty of Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, 84 Heukseok-Ro, Dongjack-Gu, Seoul, 156-756, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Peshkin BN, Ladd MK, Isaacs C, Segal H, Jacobs A, Taylor KL, Graves KD, O'Neill SC, Schwartz MD. The Genetic Education for Men (GEM) Trial: Development of Web-Based Education for Untested Men in BRCA1/2-Positive Families. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2021; 36:72-84. [PMID: 31402434 PMCID: PMC7010546 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01599-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Cascade testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer is an important public health priority. Increasing attention has been paid to the relevance of testing for men within BRCA1/2-positive families given that such testing may provide important information about their cancer risks, particularly for prostate cancer, and risks to their offspring. However, men are much less likely to seek genetic counseling and testing than their at-risk female relatives. To facilitate access to pre-test information and testing, we developed a web-based intervention (WI) for men that we are evaluating in a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). This paper describes three phases of research in the development of the WI: (1) formative (qualitative) research among men from BRCA1/2 families to assess needs and preferences for education; (2) a detailed description of the organization, format, and content of the WI; and (3) usability testing. We discuss the aims and hypotheses of the pilot RCT in which the WI is being compared with an enhanced usual care condition among at-risk men. We expect that the WI described here will foster informed decisions and lead to increased use of BRCA1/2 counseling and testing, potentially yielding improved cancer control outcomes for this understudied group, and for their at-risk relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth N Peshkin
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
| | - Mary Kate Ladd
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Hannah Segal
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Aryana Jacobs
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Kathryn L Taylor
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Kristi D Graves
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Suzanne C O'Neill
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Juarez OA, Pencheva BB, Bellcross C, Schneider KW, Turner J, Porter CC. Cancer genetic counseling for childhood cancer predisposition is associated with improved levels of knowledge and high satisfaction in parents. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:710-719. [PMID: 33179831 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Previous surveys of adults with cancer have revealed increased levels of genetic knowledge, varying levels of worry, and high satisfaction with cancer genetic counseling. We sought to determine the impact of cancer genetic counseling on parental levels of genetic knowledge, worry about cancer, and satisfaction in the context of suspected cancer predisposition in a child. We hypothesized that parents would be satisfied with cancer genetic counseling and that cancer genetic counseling would improve baseline parental genetic knowledge and decrease levels of worry. Parents were recruited from a pediatric cancer predisposition clinic in the United States. A survey was administered to two cohorts: One cohort had received cancer genetic counseling in the past and only completed one survey (post-only, n = 26), and another cohort completed the survey before and after cancer genetic counseling (pre/post, n = 23). The survey included questions on demographics, knowledge of genetics, worry levels, and satisfaction with the cancer genetic counseling service. The post-genetic counseling survey also contained a free-text section for parents to indicate what they took away from the sessions. Parental levels of genetics knowledge increased by an average of 1.9 points (p = .01), with 65.2% of parents demonstrating an increase in genetics knowledge score. Average worry levels did not change significantly (p = .37), with 52.2% of parents indicating decreased worry, and 34.8% indicating increased worry. Overall, 91.8% of parents reported high levels of satisfaction. Our results show that cancer genetic counseling in a pediatric cancer predisposition clinic improves parental levels of genetics knowledge. Satisfaction rates suggest that parents find this service beneficial. These results demonstrate the positive impacts of cancer genetic counseling on parents of children in which a hereditary cancer syndrome is known or suspected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bojana B Pencheva
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Kami W Schneider
- Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Joyce Turner
- Children's National Health System Rare Disease Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Christopher C Porter
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bracke X, Roberts J, McVeigh TP. A systematic review and meta-analysis of telephone vs in-person genetic counseling in BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:563-573. [PMID: 33131182 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Individuals with identified pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene can benefit from cancer risk-reducing strategies. In the recent years, there has been an increase in the demand of genetic services. In light of the ongoing COVID19 pandemic, alternatives to face-to-face consultations have had to be considered and adopted, including telemedicine. Informed consent is necessary for genetic testing. Studies have suggested that increased levels of cancer-specific distress may impair the patient's ability to retain information, therefore, providing informed consent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to answer if telephone genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing is non-inferior to in-person genetic counseling for the outcomes of cancer-specific distress and genetic knowledge. Databases of Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SciELO, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Database, Clinicaltrials.gov, EU clinical trials register were accessed to identify any published or unpublished relevant literature. Random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis. Four studies were included in the qualitative synthesis of the results. Three studies were included in the quantitative synthesis of the results. Telephone genetic counseling was non-inferior compared to in-person genetic counseling for the outcomes of cancer-specific distress and genetic knowledge. Sensitivity analysis corroborated the main results. Telephone genetic counseling for BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic testing may be an alternative model of delivering genetic services in front of the increased demand/or when required by social context. However, the paucity of the evidence prevents from drawing strong conclusions regarding the generalizability of these results. Further research is needed to strengthen the conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Bracke
- Institute of Continuing Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Roberts
- Institute of Continuing Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Terri P McVeigh
- Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Solem EP, Primiano M, McQuillen MP, Zak Goelz M. Factors associated with parental knowledge of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): Parental affected status and genetic counseling. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:1151-1158. [PMID: 32196829 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a genetic condition characterized by various cutaneous, neurological and psychological manifestations. The present study examined whether parental knowledge of NF1 is associated with a parent's NF1 status, affected or unaffected, and exposure to genetic counseling. Parents of children with NF1 were invited to complete an online survey answering true or false and multiple-choice questions to evaluate their overall knowledge of NF1. The study included 274 respondents, of which NF1 knowledge scores were significantly higher for unaffected parents (p < .001), and for parents who reported previously meeting with a genetic counselor (p < .001). Items pertaining to NF1-related cancer were least likely to be answered correctly. The results of the current study revealed lower overall NF1 knowledge in affected parents and knowledge gaps identifying areas where focused NF1 education may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily P Solem
- Department of Genomic Medicine and Pediatric Genetics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Michelle Primiano
- Clinical Cancer Genetics Services, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Marshall P McQuillen
- Department of Biology and Environmental Studies, Long Island University, Brookville, New York
| | - Monika Zak Goelz
- Department of Biology and Environmental Studies, Long Island University, Brookville, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yanes T, Meiser B, Kaur R, Scheepers-Joynt M, McInerny S, Taylor S, Barlow-Stewart K, Antill Y, Salmon L, Smyth C, Young MA, James PA. Uptake of polygenic risk information among women at increased risk of breast cancer. Clin Genet 2019; 97:492-501. [PMID: 31833054 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are increasingly being implemented to assess breast cancer risk. This study aimed to assess and determine factors associated with uptake of PRS among women at increased risk of breast cancer for whom genetic testing to date had been uninformative. Participants were recruited from the Variants in Practice study from which breast cancer PRS had been calculated. Four hundred women were notified by letter of the availability of their PRS and invited to complete a self-administered survey comprising several validated scales. Considering non-participants, uptake of PRS was between 61.8% and 42.1%. Multivariate logistic regression identified that women were more likely to receive their PRS if they reported greater benefits (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, P = .011) and fewer barriers to receiving their PRS (OR = 0.80, P = .007), had completed higher level education (OR = 3.32, P = .004), and did not have daughters (0.29, P = .006). Uptake of breast cancer PRS varied according to several testing- and patient-related factors. Knowledge of these factors will facilitate the implementation of polygenic testing in clinical practice and support informed decision making by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiane Yanes
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maatje Scheepers-Joynt
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simone McInerny
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shelby Taylor
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kristine Barlow-Stewart
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yoland Antill
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lucinda Salmon
- Clinical Genetics Service, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Courtney Smyth
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Black Women's Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16245112. [PMID: 31847347 PMCID: PMC6950717 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16245112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Black women at-risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) continue to underutilize genetic counseling and testing (GCT). One reason for this disparity is a fear of discrimination from insurance companies if identified as high-risk. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was enacted to protect against this type of discrimination; however, Black women’s levels of confidence in this law are unknown. In this descriptive study, we sought to (1) assess Black women’s confidence in the GINA law and (2) identify multilevel factors related to their confidence in GINA. Ninety-four Black women at-risk of HBOC completed surveys that assessed intrapersonal, interpersonal, and structural factors. Multiple regression analysis determined factors associated with confidence in GINA. Most women were ≤50 years of age (66.0%) and about half never had a cancer diagnosis (51.1%). Confidence in GINA was moderate (mean = 10.67; standard deviation = 2.54; range = 5–15). Women who valued GCT reported more confidence in GINA (β = 0.345; CI 0.017 to 0.673; p = 0.040). Lack of confidence in GINA may serve as a barrier to seeking GCT. Efforts to increase the perceived value of GCT among Black women could be benefited by increasing awareness of national efforts towards privacy protections of genetic information.
Collapse
|
24
|
Lee SH, Lee H, Lim MC, Kim S. Knowledge and Anxiety Related to Hereditary Ovarian Cancer in Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients. KOREAN JOURNAL OF WOMEN HEALTH NURSING 2019; 25:365-378. [PMID: 37679908 DOI: 10.4069/kjwhn.2019.25.4.365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The awareness of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) and BRCA testing is increasing in Korea. Compared to the sizable research on HBOC knowledge among breast cancer women, studies in the ovarian cancer population are limited. This paper aimed to investigate the level of knowledge of hereditary ovarian cancer and anxiety in women diagnosed with serous ovarian cancer in Korea and determine differences in the knowledge and anxiety according to whether genetic testing was undertaken and whether BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were present. METHODS Using a descriptive research design, a cross-sectional survey was conducted on 100 women diagnosed with serous ovarian cancer at N hospital in Gyeonggi-do, Korea, from July to November 2018. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, and Pearson's correlation coefficient using the SPSS 21.0 program. RESULTS The hereditary ovarian cancer-related knowledge score was mid-level (mean score 8.90±3.29 out of a total of 17), as was the state anxiety level was mid-level (mean score 47.96±3.26 out of possible score range of 20-80). Genetic knowledge of hereditary ovarian cancer was associated with age, education, occupation, genetic counseling, and BRCA mutations. There were no statistically significant factors related to anxiety and there were no statistically significant correlations between knowledge level and anxiety. CONCLUSION More comprehensive education on gene-related cancer is needed for ovarian cancer patients, especially for items with low knowledge scores. A genetic counseling protocol should be developed to allow more patients to alleviate their anxiety through genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Hee Lee
- Student, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyangkyu Lee
- Student, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Student, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sue Kim
- Student, College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Graves KD, Gómez-Trillos S, Carrera P, Campos C, Anderson L, Luta G, Peshkin BN, Schwartz MD, Cupertino AP, Gonzalez N, Sheppard VB. Culturally Targeted Video Improves Psychosocial Outcomes in Latina Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:E4793. [PMID: 31795362 PMCID: PMC6926842 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Latina women at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have lower awareness, knowledge, and use of genetic counseling and testing services (GCT) than non-Latina Whites. Few interventions have been developed to reduce these disparities among at-risk Latinas. This pilot study assessed the impact of a culturally targeted narrative video developed by our team. The study included 40 Latina immigrants living in the United States who were at risk of HBOC, including affected and unaffected women. We assessed pre-post differences in psychosocial outcomes. Participants were 47.35 years old on average (SD = 9.48). Most (70%) were unaffected with cancer, had an annual income of $40,000 or less (65%), an education of High School or less (62.5%), and were uninsured (77.5%). The video significantly enhanced knowledge (p < 0.001), positive attitudes (p < 0.05), anticipatory positive emotions (p < 0.05), and intentions to participate in counseling (p < 0.001). Importantly, the video also significantly reduced negative attitudes (p < 0.05), and attitudinal ambivalence (p < 0.001). The culturally targeted video shows preliminary evidence in improving psychosocial outcomes related to GCT uptake in Latinas at risk for HBOC. This intervention is a promising easily-disseminable strategy to address disparities in GCT utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (K.D.G.); (S.G.-T.); (G.L.); (B.N.P.); (M.D.S.)
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Kristi D. Graves
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (K.D.G.); (S.G.-T.); (G.L.); (B.N.P.); (M.D.S.)
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Sara Gómez-Trillos
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (K.D.G.); (S.G.-T.); (G.L.); (B.N.P.); (M.D.S.)
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Pilar Carrera
- Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Claudia Campos
- Nueva Vida, DC Office—801 N Pitt St., Suite 113, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA;
| | - Lyndsay Anderson
- College of Health and Human Services, School of Nursing, California State University, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA;
| | - George Luta
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (K.D.G.); (S.G.-T.); (G.L.); (B.N.P.); (M.D.S.)
- Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, 4000 Reservoir Rd., NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA
| | - Beth N. Peshkin
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (K.D.G.); (S.G.-T.); (G.L.); (B.N.P.); (M.D.S.)
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Marc D. Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA; (K.D.G.); (S.G.-T.); (G.L.); (B.N.P.); (M.D.S.)
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, 3300 Whitehaven Street, Suite 4100, Washington, DC 20007, USA
| | - Ana-Paula Cupertino
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, 40 Prospect Avenue, Office number 316, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA;
| | - Nathaly Gonzalez
- Capital Breast Care Center, 1000 New Jersey Ave, SE, Washington, DC 20003, USA;
| | - Vanessa B. Sheppard
- Department of Health Behavior Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA;
- Massey Cancer Center, Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Guan Y, Condit CM, Escoffery C, Bellcross CA, McBride CM. Do Women who Receive a Negative BRCA1/2 Risk Result Understand the Implications for Breast Cancer Risk? Public Health Genomics 2019; 22:102-109. [PMID: 31597139 DOI: 10.1159/000503129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS National guidelines endorse using evidence-based tools to identify those at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). This study aimed to evaluate whether women deemed not to be at increased risk of being a BRCA mutation carrier; the majority of those screened, recall, understand and accept the implications of these results for breast cancer risk. METHODS We conducted an online survey with women (n = 148) who screened negative on a brief HBOC screener. RESULTS While women tended to accept HBOC screener as accurate (range 9-45; mean 32, SD 5.0), less than half (43%) accurately recalled their result. Only 52% understood that they were at low risk of carrying a mutation, and just 34% correctly understood their breast cancer risk. African American women were less likely to recall (33 vs. 53% respectively, OR 0.5, p = 0.03), understand (42 vs. 63% respectively, OR 0.4, p = 0.02), and accept (mean 31 vs. 33 respectively, β -2.1, p = 0.02) the result compared to Whites. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that those at low risk of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation had limited understanding of the distinction between mutation risk and breast cancer risk. Theory-based communication strategies are needed to increase the understanding of the implications of being at low risk for hereditary cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Guan
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,
| | - Celeste M Condit
- Department of Communication Studies, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cecelia A Bellcross
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Colleen M McBride
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Himes DO, Davis SH, Lassetter JH, Peterson NE, Clayton MF, Birmingham WC, Kinney AY. Does family communication matter? Exploring knowledge of breast cancer genetics in cancer families. J Community Genet 2019; 10:481-487. [PMID: 30877488 PMCID: PMC6754477 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00413-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge of breast cancer genetics is critical for those at increased hereditary risk who must make decisions about breast cancer screening options. This descriptive study explored theory-based relationships among cognitive and emotional variables related to knowledge of breast cancer genetics in cancer families. Participants included first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer who had received genetic counseling and testing. Study participants themselves did not have breast cancer and had not received genetic counseling or testing. Data were collected by telephone interviews and surveys. Variables analyzed included numeracy, health literacy, cancer-related distress, age, education, and the reported amount of information shared by the participants' family members about genetic counseling. The multiple regression model explained 13.9% of variance in knowledge of breast cancer genetics (p = 0.03). Best fit of the multiple regression model included all variables except education. Reported amount of information shared was the only independently significant factor associated with knowledge (β = 0.28, p = 0.01). Participants who reported higher levels of information shared by a family member about information learned during a genetic counseling session also demonstrated increased knowledge about breast cancer genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah O Himes
- College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, 500 Spencer W. Kimball Tower, Provo, UT, USA.
| | - Sarah H Davis
- College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, 500 Spencer W. Kimball Tower, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Jane H Lassetter
- College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, 500 Spencer W. Kimball Tower, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Neil E Peterson
- College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, 500 Spencer W. Kimball Tower, Provo, UT, USA
| | - Margaret F Clayton
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, 10 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Wendy C Birmingham
- Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, 1054 Spencer W. Kimball Tower, Provo, UT, 84604, USA
| | - Anita Y Kinney
- Department of Epidemiology - School of Public Health, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Underhill-Blazey M, Stopfer J, Chittenden A, Nayak MM, Lansang K, Lederman R, Garber J, Gundersen DA. Development and testing of the KnowGene scale to assess general cancer genetic knowledge related to multigene panel testing. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1558-1564. [PMID: 31010603 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and evaluate a measure of cancer genetics knowledge relevant to multigene panel testing. METHODS The instrument was developed using systematic input from a national panel of genetics experts, acceptability evaluation by patient advocates, and cognitive testing. Twenty-four candidate items were completed by 591 breast or gynecological patients who had undergone genetic counseling and multigene panel testing in the past 18 months. A unidimensional item response theory model was fit with a mix of 2-parameter logistic nested response (2 plnrm) and 2-parameter logistic (2 pl) items. RESULTS Key domains addressing cancer genetics knowledge were found to be overlapping. Of the 24 candidate items, 8 items were removed due to poor discrimination or local dependence. The remaining 16 items had good fit (RMSEA = 0.045, CFI = 0.946) and discrimination parameters ranging from 0.49 to 1.60. The items specified as 2 plnrm distinguish between those answering incorrect versus don't know, with discrimination ranging from 0.51 to 1.02. Information curves were highest among those with lower knowledge. CONCLUSION KnowGene is a rigorously developed and effective measure of knowledge after cancer genetic counseling and multigene panel testing. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Measuring knowledge in a systematic way will inform practice and research initiatives in cancer genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jill Stopfer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Simmons College, United States
| | - Anu Chittenden
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Simmons College, United States
| | - Manan M Nayak
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Simmons College, United States
| | - Kristina Lansang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Simmons College, United States
| | - Ruth Lederman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Simmons College, United States
| | - Judy Garber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Simmons College, United States
| | - Daniel A Gundersen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Simmons College, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Willingness to decrease mammogram frequency among women at low risk for hereditary breast cancer. Sci Rep 2019; 9:9599. [PMID: 31270367 PMCID: PMC6610104 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45967-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess women's willingness to alter mammogram frequency based on their low risk for HBOC, and to examine if cognitive and emotional factors are associated with women's inclination to decrease mammogram frequency. We conducted an online survey with women (N = 124) who were unlikely to have a BRCA mutation and at average population risk for breast cancer based on family history. Most women were either white (50%) or African American (38%) and were 50 years or older (74%). One-third of women (32%) were willing to decrease mammogram frequency (as consistent with the USPSTF guideline), 42% reported being unwilling and 26% were unsure. Multivariate logistic regression showed that feeling worried about breast cancer (Adjust OR = 0.33, p = 0.01), greater genetic risk knowledge (Adjust OR = 0.74, p = 0.047), and more frequent past mammogram screening (Adjust OR = 0.13, p = 0.001) were associated with being less willing to decrease screening frequency. Findings suggest that emerging genomics-informed medical guidelines may not be accepted by many patients when the recommendations go against what is considered standard practice. Further study of the interplay between emotion- and cognition-based processing of the HBOC screen result will be important for strategizing communication interventions aimed at realizing the potential of precision public health.
Collapse
|
30
|
McCuaig JM, Tone AA, Maganti M, Romagnuolo T, Ricker N, Shuldiner J, Rodin G, Stockley T, Kim RH, Bernardini MQ. Modified panel-based genetic counseling for ovarian cancer susceptibility: A randomized non-inferiority study. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:108-115. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
31
|
Burns C, Yeates L, Semsarian C, Ingles J. Evaluating a custom-designed aid to improve communication of genetic results in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026627. [PMID: 30782759 PMCID: PMC6361342 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Genetic testing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in the era of genomics brings unique challenges for genetic counselling. The number of genes routinely included in an HCM gene panel has increased markedly, many with minimal if any robust evidence of gene-disease association. Subsequently, there is a greater chance of uncertain genetic findings. The responsibility of communicating this information with at-risk relatives lies with the index case (proband). We have developed a communication aid to assist with the delivery of genetic results to the proband. We have previously shown the aid is feasible and acceptable and have now developed a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a genetic counsellor-led intervention incorporating the communication aid. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a prospective randomised controlled trial. We will investigate the impact of a genetic counsellor-led intervention to return proband genetic results using a custom-designed communication aid. We aim to improve knowledge and empowerment. The primary outcome of this trial is the ability and confidence of the proband to communicate genetic results to at-risk relatives. Secondary outcomes will assess genetic knowledge, satisfaction with services, outcomes from genetic counselling and psychological adaptation to genetic information. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by and is in strict accordance with the Sydney Local Health District Ethics Review Committee (X16-0030; 22/01/2016; version 1). Results from this trial will be prepared as a manuscript and submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication as well as submission for presentation at national and international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12617000706370.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Burns
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Newtown, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Newtown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Laura Yeates
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Newtown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher Semsarian
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Newtown, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Newtown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jodie Ingles
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology at Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Newtown, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Newtown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sutton AL, He J, Tanner E, Edmonds MC, Henderson A, Hurtado de Mendoza A, Sheppard VB. Understanding Medical Mistrust in Black Women at Risk of BRCA 1/2 Mutations. JOURNAL OF HEALTH DISPARITIES RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2019; 12:35-47. [PMID: 32995070 PMCID: PMC7521839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The benefits of genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) are well documented; however, Black women are less likely to use these services compared to White women. Mistrust of the medical system has been associated with Black women's use of genetic counseling and testing (GCT). However, relatively little is known about the correlates of medical mistrust in Black women at increased risk of HBOC. In this study, we examined the prevalence and predictors of medical mistrust in 94 Black women at-risk of HBOC. Most women were married (48.7%) and had at least some collegiate education (57.1%). While no predisposing characteristics were significantly related to medical mistrust, bivariate analysis indicated significant relationships between mistrust and fatalism (p=0.04), perceptions of discrimination in the healthcare setting (p=0.01), and self-efficacy in obtaining GCT (p=0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed that women who reported more discriminatory experiences and women with less confidence in obtaining GCT expressed greater medical mistrust. Multilevel approaches are needed to address psychosocial factors associated with feelings of mistrust. Future efforts must not solely focus on educating women on the importance of and need for GCT; addressing structural barriers, such as patient-provider interactions, that contribute to mistrust must become a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erin Tanner
- Greater Washington Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Genetics
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Fournier DM, Bazzell AF, Dains JE. Comparing Outcomes of Genetic Counseling Options in Breast and Ovarian Cancer: An Integrative Review
. Oncol Nurs Forum 2018; 45:96-105. [PMID: 29251290 DOI: 10.1188/18.onf.96-105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Genetic counseling is vital in helping people at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) make informed decisions to undergo BRCA testing. Many people, particularly those in rural locations, lack access to these services. This review examines evidence to determine if remotely delivered genetic counseling via telephone or telemedicine is an effective alternative to in-person counseling for people who are at high risk for HBOC.
. LITERATURE SEARCH A literature review was completed by searching PubMed, SCOPUS, and CINAHL® databases.
. DATA EVALUATION 151 articles were identified from the search, and 7 were included in the review.
. SYNTHESIS Patients' BRCA knowledge acquisition, cancer-specific distress, anxiety, depression, and satisfaction with mode of counseling delivery were equivalent between in-person and remotely delivered counseling groups. Genetic testing rates were significantly higher in participants receiving in-person counseling. Remotely delivered genetic counseling was more convenient and less expensive. Mixed outcomes existed regarding counselor-patient communication.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The demand for genetic counseling will grow as advances in cancer genomics reveal genes that may contribute to cancer predisposition. Innovative delivery models are necessary to ensure that all people have access to care.
Collapse
|
34
|
Wynn J, Martinez J, Bulafka J, Duong J, Zhang Y, Chiuzan C, Preti J, Cremona ML, Jobanputra V, Fyer AJ, Klitzman RL, Appelbaum PS, Chung WK. Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:709-722. [PMID: 29168042 PMCID: PMC5945295 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0172-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The impact of returning secondary results from exome sequencing (ES) on patients/participants is important to understand as ES is increasingly utilized in clinical care and research. Participants were recruited from studies using ES and were separated into two arms: 107 who had ES and were offered the choice to learn secondary results (ES group) and 85 who had not yet had ES (No ES group). Questionnaires were administered at baseline and 1 and 12 months, following results disclosure (ES group) or enrollment (No ES group). While the majority (65%) elected to learn all results following pre-test counseling, it was reduced from the 76% who indicated a desire for all results at baseline. Thirty-seven percent received results associated with an increased personal disease risk. There were no differences in changes in any of the psychological and social measures from baseline to post-results disclosure between the ES and No ES groups. Receiving a wide range of secondary findings appeared to have little measurable impact on most participants. The experience of learning secondary results may be related to participants' previous experiences with genetics, as well as the genetic counseling provided. Future research with a more diverse, genetically naïve group, as well as scalable methods of delivery, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Josue Martinez
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Bulafka
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jimmy Duong
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Codruta Chiuzan
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jain Preti
- Department of Genetic, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Abby J Fyer
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert L Klitzman
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul S Appelbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave., Russ Berrie Pavilion, 6th Fl, Rm, New York, NY, 620, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Smagarinsky Y, Burns C, Spinks C, Semsarian C, Ingles J. Development of a communication aid for explaining hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genetic test results. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2017; 3:53. [PMID: 29152326 PMCID: PMC5680798 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-017-0205-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Large gene panels are now commonplace for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), increasing the yield of uncertain genetic findings. Few resources exist which aim to facilitate communication of HCM genetic test results. We sought to develop, pilot, and refine a communication aid for probands receiving HCM genetic test results. Methods Development was a multi-step process involving expertise of a multidisciplinary team, literature review, and empirical experience. The aid went through an iterative revision process throughout the piloting phase to incorporate feedback. HCM probands attending a specialized multidisciplinary HCM clinic, aged ≥ 18 years and genetic test results available for disclosure between May and August 2016, or recently received their gene results (January–April 2015) were eligible. A purposive sampling strategy was employed, recruiting those attending clinic during the study period or those who could attend without difficulty. Results We developed and pilot tested a genetic counsellor-led communication aid. Based on clinical expertise, the aid addresses (a) what genetic testing is, (b) implications for the patient, (c) reasoning for variant classification, and (d) implications for the family. Pilot data were sought to assess knowledge, feasibility, and acceptability using a self-report survey 2 weeks post-intervention. Twelve of 13 participants completed the follow-up questionnaire. Participants valued the individualised nature of the aid, recommended use of the aid, and indicated genetic knowledge, and family communication was better facilitated. Iterative modification of images helped to more simply depict important genetic concepts. Conclusions We have developed a tool that is feasible, acceptable, and helpful to patients receiving genetic results. This is an important first step, and trial of the aid to assess effectiveness compared to usual care will follow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yana Smagarinsky
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Charlotte Burns
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Catherine Spinks
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher Semsarian
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jodie Ingles
- Agnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer. Fam Cancer 2017; 15:529-39. [PMID: 26969308 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9900-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Telephone genetic counseling (TC) for high-risk women interested in BRCA1/2 testing has been shown to yield positive outcomes comparable to usual care (UC; in-person) genetic counseling. However, little is known about how genetic counselors perceive the delivery of these alternate forms of genetic counseling. As part of a randomized trial of TC versus UC, genetic counselors completed a 5-item genetic counselor process questionnaire (GCQ) assessing key elements of pre-test sessions (information delivery, emotional support, addressing questions and concerns, tailoring of session, and facilitation of decision-making) with the 479 female participants (TC, N = 236; UC, N = 243). The GCQ scores did not differ for TC vs. UC sessions (t (477) = 0.11, p = 0.910). However, multivariate analysis showed that participant race/ethnicity significantly predicted genetic counselor perceptions (β = 0.172, p < 0.001) in that the GCQ scores were lower for minorities in TC and UC. Exploratory analyses suggested that GCQ scores may be associated with patient preference for UC versus TC (t (79) = 2.21, p = 0.030). Additionally, we found that genetic counselor ratings of session effectiveness were generally concordant with patient perceptions of the session. These data indicate that genetic counselors perceive that key components of TC can be delivered as effectively as UC, and that these elements may contribute to specific aspects of patient satisfaction. However, undefined process differences may be present which account for lower counselor perceptions about the effectiveness of their sessions with minority women (i.e., those other than non-Hispanic Whites). We discuss other potential clinical and research implications of our findings.
Collapse
|
37
|
Seo H, Yi M. A Study on Genetic Knowledge and Anxiety in Patients with Breast Cancer. ASIAN ONCOLOGY NURSING 2017. [DOI: 10.5388/aon.2017.17.3.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeyeon Seo
- Graduate School of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myungsun Yi
- College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Research Participants’ Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research. J Genet Couns 2016; 26:841-851. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0059-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
39
|
Douma KFL, Smets EMA, Allain DC. Non-genetic health professionals' attitude towards, knowledge of and skills in discussing and ordering genetic testing for hereditary cancer. Fam Cancer 2016; 15:341-50. [PMID: 26590592 PMCID: PMC4803807 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-015-9852-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Non-genetic health professionals (NGHPs) have insufficient knowledge of cancer genetics, express educational needs and are unprepared to counsel their patients regarding their genetic test results. So far, it is unclear how NGHPs perceive their own communication skills. This study was undertaken to gain insight in their perceptions, attitudes and knowledge. Two publically accessible databases were used to invite NGHPs providing cancer genetic services to complete a questionnaire. The survey assessed: sociodemographic attributes, experience in ordering hereditary cancer genetic testing, attitude, knowledge, perception of communication skills (e.g. information giving, decision-making) and educational needs. Of all respondents (N = 49, response rate 11 %), most have a positive view of their own information giving (mean = 53.91, range 13–65) and decision making skills (64–77 % depending on topic). NGHPs feel responsible for enabling disease and treatment related behavior (89–91 %). However, 20–30 % reported difficulties managing patients’ emotions and did not see management of long-term emotions as their responsibility. Correct answers on knowledge questions ranged between 41 and 96 %. Higher knowledge was associated with more confidence in NGHPs’ own communication skills (rs = .33, p = 0.03). Although NGHPs have a positive view of their communication skills, they perceive more difficulties managing emotions. The association between less confidence in communication skills and lower knowledge level suggests awareness of knowledge gaps affects confidence. NGHPs might benefit from education about managing client emotions. Further research using observation of actual counselling consultations is needed to investigate the skills of this specific group of providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten F L Douma
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dawn C Allain
- Division of Human Genetics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Brédart A, Kop JL, De Pauw A, Caron O, Fajac A, Noguès C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Dolbeault S. Effect on perceived control and psychological distress of genetic knowledge in women with breast cancer receiving a BRCA1/2 test result. Breast 2016; 31:121-127. [PMID: 27837705 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Revised: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Information provision during BRCA1/2 genetic counseling is complex and expected to be increasingly so with gene panel testing. This prospective study evaluated whether genetic knowledge in counselees with breast cancer (BC) after a pre-test genetic counseling visit (T1) enhance their feeling of personal control while minimizing distress after the notification of BRCA1/2 result (T2). At T1, 243 (89% response rate) counselees completed questionnaires on genetic knowledge (BGKQ), perceived cancer genetic risk; of which, at T2, 180 (66%) completed the BGKQ again, scales of anxiety/depression, distress specific to genetic risk, and perceived control. Multilevel models were performed accounting for clinician, and testing an effect of knowledge on psychological outcomes according to the adequacy of counselees' perceived genetic predisposition to cancer. The mean knowledge score was moderate at T1, decreased while not significantly differing by BRCA1/2 test result at T2. Knowledge at T1 had no direct effect on psychological outcomes, but in counselees who over-estimated their cancer genetic risk, higher knowledge at T1 predicted higher specific distress at T2. In BC affected counselees who over-estimate their cancer genetic risk, higher BRCA1/2 pre-test genetic knowledge seem to lead to increased specific distress. Identifying these BC affected counselees who over-estimate their genetic cancer risk and helping them to interpret their genetic knowledge instead of providing them with exhaustive genetic information could minimize their distress after test result receipt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Brédart
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, France; University Paris Descartes, 71, Avenue Edouard Vaillant, 92774 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
| | - Jean-Luc Kop
- Université de Lorraine, Inter-Psy, Inter-Psy, 3 Place Godefroy de Bouillon, BP 33 97, 54 015 Nancy Cedex, France
| | - Antoine De Pauw
- Institut Curie, Cancer Genetic Clinic, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Olivier Caron
- Gustave Roussy Hôpital Universitaire, Cancer Genetic Clinic, 114 rue Ed Vaillant, 94 805 Villejuif, France
| | - Anne Fajac
- Hôpital Tenon Service d'Histologie-Biologie Tumorale, AP-HP, ER2 UPMC Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020, France
| | - Catherine Noguès
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, Boulevard Sainte Margueritte, Marseille, France
| | | | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Institut Curie, Supportive Care Department, Psycho-oncology Unit 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris Cedex 05, France; CESP, Univ. Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Jackson MC, Anderson L, Sheppard VB. The Role of Knowledge on Genetic Counseling and Testing in Black Cancer Survivors at Increased Risk of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation. J Genet Couns 2016; 26:113-121. [PMID: 27402168 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9986-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counseling and testing (GCT) for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers (HBOC) can inform treatment decisions in survivors. Black women at risk of HBOC have lower GCT engagement. There is limited data about Black survivors' experiences. The goals of this study were to: 1) examine the factors associated with HBOC knowledge and 2) assess the impact of knowledge on GCT engagement in a sample of Black survivors at risk of HBOC. Fifty Black at-risk breast/ovarian cancer survivors participated in a telephone-based survey. GCT use was measured across a continuum (awareness, referral, and use). The primary predictor variable was HBOC knowledge. Other clinical, socio-demographic, and psychosocial variables were included. Multiple linear and ordinal regression models (knowledge as the outcome and GCT as the outcome) assessed the predictors of knowledge and GCT engagement. Less than half (48 %) of survivors were referred to or used GCT services. Knowledge was moderate (M = 7.78, SD = 1.61). In the multivariable analysis, lower age (β = -.34, p = .01) and lower stage (β = -.318, p = .017) were associated with higher knowledge. Higher knowledge (β = .567, p = .006) and higher self-efficacy (β = .406, p = .001) were significantly associated with GCT engagement. Future interventions directed at increasing knowledge, self-efficacy, and improving the referral process are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven St. NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
| | - Monica C Jackson
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, American University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Lyndsay Anderson
- Capital Breast Care Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital/Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3300 Whitehaven St. NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Peshkin BN, Kelly S, Nusbaum RH, Similuk M, DeMarco TA, Hooker GW, Valdimarsdottir HB, Forman AD, Joines JR, Davis C, McCormick SR, McKinnon W, Graves KD, Isaacs C, Garber J, Wood M, Jandorf L, Schwartz MD. Patient Perceptions of Telephone vs. In-Person BRCA1/BRCA2 Genetic Counseling. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:472-82. [PMID: 26455498 PMCID: PMC4829475 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9897-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Telephone genetic counseling (TC) for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer risk has been associated with positive outcomes in high risk women. However, little is known about how patients perceive TC. As part of a randomized trial of TC versus usual care (UC; in-person genetic counseling), we compared high risk women's perceptions of: (1) overall satisfaction with genetic counseling; (2) convenience; (3) attentiveness during the session; (4) counselor effectiveness in providing support; and (5) counselor ability to recognize emotional responses during the session. Among the 554 participants (TC, N = 272; UC, N = 282), delivery mode was not associated with self-reported satisfaction. However, TC participants found counseling significantly more convenient than UC participants (OR = 4.78, 95 % CI = 3.32, 6.89) while also perceiving lower levels of support (OR = 0.56, 95 % CI = 0.40-0.80) and emotional recognition (OR = 0.53, 95 % CI = 0.37-0.76). In exploratory analyses, we found that non-Hispanic white participants reported higher counselor support in UC than in TC (69.4 % vs. 52.8 %; OR = 3.06, 95 % CI = 1.39-6.74), while minority women perceived less support in UC vs. TC (58.3 % vs. 38.7 %; OR = 0.80, 95 % CI = 0.39-1.65). We discuss potential research and practice implications of these findings which may further improve the effectiveness and utilization of TC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth N Peshkin
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
| | - Scott Kelly
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Morgan Similuk
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Tiffani A DeMarco
- Cancer Genetic Counseling Program, Inova Translational Medicine Institute, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA, USA
| | | | - Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Psychology, Reyjavik University, Reyjavik, Iceland
| | - Andrea D Forman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Risk Assessment Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jessica Rispoli Joines
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claire Davis
- Joan H. Marks Graduate Program in Human Genetics, Sarah Lawrence College, Yonkers, NY, USA
| | - Shelley R McCormick
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wendy McKinnon
- Familial Cancer Program, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Kristi D Graves
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| | - Judy Garber
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marie Wood
- Familial Cancer Program, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Lina Jandorf
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc D Schwartz
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Jess and Mildred Fisher Center for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Genomics Research, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Himes DO, Clayton MF, Donaldson GW, Ellington L, Buys SS, Kinney AY. Breast Cancer Risk Perceptions among Relatives of Women with Uninformative Negative BRCA1/2 Test Results: The Moderating Effect of the Amount of Shared Information. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:258-69. [PMID: 26245632 PMCID: PMC4799250 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9866-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The most common result of BRCA1/2 mutation testing when performed in a family without a previously identified mutation is an uninformative negative test result. Women in these families may have an increased risk for breast cancer because of mutations in non-BRCA breast cancer predisposition genes, including moderate- or low-risk genes, or shared environmental factors. Genetic counselors often encourage counselees to share information with family members, however it is unclear how much information counselees share and the impact that shared information may have on accuracy of risk perception in family members. We evaluated 85 sisters and daughters of women who received uninformative negative BRCA1/2 results. We measured accuracy of risk perception using a latent variable model where accuracy was represented as the correlation between perceived risk (indicators = verbal and quantitative measures) and calculated risk (indicators = Claus and BRCAPRO). Participants who reported more information was shared with them by their sister or mother about her genetic counseling session had greater accuracy of risk perception (0.707, p = 0.000) than those who reported little information was shared (0.326, p = 0.003). However, counselees shared very little information; nearly 20 % of family members reported their sister or mother shared nothing with them about her genetic counseling. Family members were generally not aware of the existence of a genetic counseling summary letter. Our findings underscore the need for effective strategies that facilitate counselees to share information about their genetic counseling sessions. Such communication may help their relatives better understand their cancer risks and enhance risk appropriate cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah O Himes
- College of Nursing, Brigham Young University, 500 Spencer W. Kimball Tower, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
| | | | - Gary W Donaldson
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lee Ellington
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anita Y Kinney
- Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
- University of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
de Geus E, Aalfs CM, Menko FH, Sijmons RH, Verdam MGE, de Haes HCJM, Smets EMA. Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing Index Patients' Knowledge, Motivation and Self-Efficacy Regarding the Disclosure of Hereditary Cancer Risk Information to Relatives. Int J Behav Med 2016; 22:551-60. [PMID: 25515913 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-014-9455-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the use of genetic services, counselees do not always share hereditary cancer information with at-risk relatives. Reasons for not informing relatives may be categorized as a lack of: knowledge, motivation, and/or self-efficacy. PURPOSE This study aims to develop and test the psychometric properties of the Informing Relatives Inventory, a battery of instruments that intend to measure counselees' knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy regarding the disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information to at-risk relatives. METHOD Guided by the proposed conceptual framework, existing instruments were selected and new instruments were developed. We tested the instruments' acceptability, dimensionality, reliability, and criterion-related validity in consecutive index patients visiting the Clinical Genetics department with questions regarding hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer or colon cancer. RESULTS Data of 211 index patients were included (response rate = 62%). The Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI) assesses three barriers in disclosure representing seven domains. Instruments assessing index patients' (positive) motivation and self-efficacy were acceptable and reliable and suggested good criterion-related validity. Psychometric properties of instruments assessing index patients knowledge were disputable. These items were moderately accepted by index patients and the criterion-related validity was weaker. CONCLUSION This study presents a first conceptual framework and associated inventory (IRI) that improves insight into index patients' barriers regarding the disclosure of genetic cancer information to at-risk relatives. Instruments assessing (positive) motivation and self-efficacy proved to be reliable measurements. Measuring index patients knowledge appeared to be more challenging. Further research is necessary to ensure IRI's dimensionality and sensitivity to change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline de Geus
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Carere DA, Kraft P, Kaphingst KA, Roberts JS, Green RC. Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing. Genet Med 2016; 18:65-72. [PMID: 25812042 PMCID: PMC4583799 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to measure changes to genetics knowledge and self-efficacy following personal genomic testing (PGT). METHODS New customers of 23andMe and Pathway Genomics completed a series of online surveys. We measured genetics knowledge (nine true/false items) and genetics self-efficacy (five Likert-scale items) before receipt of results and 6 months after results and used paired methods to evaluate change over time. Correlates of change (e.g., decision regret) were identified using linear regression. RESULTS 998 PGT customers (59.9% female; 85.8% White; mean age 46.9 ± 15.5 years) were included in our analyses. Mean genetics knowledge score was 8.15 ± 0.95 (out of 9) at baseline and 8.25 ± 0.92 at 6 months (P = 0.0024). Mean self-efficacy score was 29.06 ± 5.59 (out of 35) at baseline and 27.7 ± 5.46 at 6 months (P < 0.0001); on each item, 30-45% of participants reported lower self-efficacy following PGT. Change in self-efficacy was positively associated with health-care provider consultation (P = 0.0042), impact of PGT on perceived control over one's health (P < 0.0001), and perceived value of PGT (P < 0.0001) and was negatively associated with decision regret (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Lowered genetics self-efficacy following PGT may reflect an appropriate reevaluation by consumers in response to receiving complex genetic information.Genet Med 18 1, 65-72.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna Alexis Carere
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Kimberly A. Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, College of Humanities, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - J. Scott Roberts
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Robert C. Green
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Partners Personalized Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Randomized Trial of Telegenetics vs. In-Person Cancer Genetic Counseling: Cost, Patient Satisfaction and Attendance. J Genet Couns 2015; 24:961-70. [PMID: 25833335 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9836-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2015] [Accepted: 03/19/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Telegenetics-genetic counseling via live videoconferencing-can improve access to cancer genetic counseling (CGC) in underserved areas, but studies on cancer telegenetics have not applied randomized methodology or assessed cost. We report cost, patient satisfaction and CGC attendance from a randomized trial comparing telegenetics with in-person CGC among individuals referred to CGC in four rural oncology clinics. Participants (n = 162) were randomized to receive CGC at their local oncology clinic in-person or via telegenetics. Cost analyses included telegenetics system; mileage; and personnel costs for genetic counselor, IT specialist, and clinic personnel. CGC attendance was tracked via study database. Patient satisfaction was assessed 1 week post-CGC via telephone survey using validated scales. Total costs were $106 per telegenetics patient and $244 per in-person patient. Patient satisfaction did not differ by group on either satisfaction scale. In-person patients were significantly more likely to attend CGC than telegenetics patients (89 vs. 79 %, p = 0.03), with bivariate analyses showing an association between lesser computer comfort and lower attendance rate (Chi-square = 5.49, p = 0.02). Our randomized trial of telegenetics vs. in-person counseling found that telegenetics cost less than in-person counseling, with high satisfaction among those who attended. This study provides support for future randomized trials comparing multiple service delivery models on longer-term psychosocial and behavioral outcomes.
Collapse
|
47
|
Batte B, Sheldon JP, Arscott P, Huismann DJ, Salberg L, Day SM, Yashar BM. Family communication in a population at risk for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Genet Couns 2014; 24:336-48. [PMID: 25304619 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9774-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 09/09/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Encouraging family communication is an integral component of genetic counseling; therefore, we sought to identify factors impacting communication to family members at risk for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). Participants (N = 383) completed an online survey assessing: 1) demographics (gender, genetic test results, HCM family history, and disease severity); 2) illness representations; 3) family functioning and cohesiveness; 4) coping styles; 5) comprehension of HCM autosomal dominant inheritance; and 6) communication of HCM risk information to at-risk relatives. Participants were a national sample of individuals with HCM, recruited through the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Association. Data from 183 participants were analyzed using a logistic regression analysis, with family communication as a dichotomous dependent variable. We found that female gender and higher comprehension of autosomal dominant inheritance were significant predictors of participants' communication of HCM risk information to all their siblings and children. Our results suggest that utilizing interventions that promote patient comprehension (e.g., a teaching-focused model of genetic counseling) are important and may positively impact family communication within families with HCM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Batte
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Disparities in uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in a randomized trial of telephone counseling. Genet Med 2014; 17:467-75. [PMID: 25232856 PMCID: PMC4364924 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose As genetic counseling and testing become more fully-integrated into clinical care, alternative delivery models are increasingly prominent. This study examines predictors of genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer among high-risk women in a randomized trial of in-person vs. telephone-based genetic counseling. Methods Methods include multivariable logistic regression and interaction analyses. Results Of the 669 participants, 600 completed counseling and 523 received test results. As previously reported, participants randomized to telephone counseling were significantly less likely to be tested. In intention to treat analyses, completion of counseling and testing was associated with: race/ethnicity (OR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.20-3.20), , perceived stress (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.98, knowledge (OR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23), and randomization group (OR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.01-2.16).. Further, race/ethnicity moderated the association between randomization group and testing, where minority women receiving telephone counseling were least likely to complete testing. Conclusion Evidence for logistical and communication-based explanations for this interaction are presented. The overall increased access made possible with telephone genetic counseling should be considered in light of the possibility that this may also lead to lower rates of testing among high-risk minority women. Additional care should be taken to assess and address potential barriers when services are delivered by phone.
Collapse
|
49
|
Jbilou J, Halilem N, Blouin-Bougie J, Amara N, Landry R, Simard J. Medical genetic counseling for breast cancer in primary care: a synthesis of major determinants of physicians' practices in primary care settings. Public Health Genomics 2014; 17:190-208. [PMID: 24993835 DOI: 10.1159/000362358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2013] [Accepted: 03/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This paper aims to identify relevant potential predictors of medical genetic counseling for breast cancer (MGC-BC) in primary care and to develop a comprehensive questionnaire to study MGC-BC. METHODS A scoping review was conducted to identify the predictors of MGC-BC among primary care physicians. Relevant articles were identified in selected databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane CENTRAL) and 4 selected relevant electronic journals. RESULTS An inductive analysis of the 193 quantitatively tested variables, conducted by 3 researchers, showed that 6 conceptual categories of determinants, namely (1) demographic, (2) organizational, (3) experiential, (4) professional, (5) psychological, and (6) cognitive, influence MGC-BC practices. CONCLUSION There is a scarcity of literature addressing the medical behavior determinants of MGC-BC. Future research is needed to identify effective strategies put into action to support the integration of MGC-BC in primary care medical practices and routines. However, our results shed light on 2 levels of actions that could improve genetic counseling services in primary care: (1) medical training and educational efforts emphasizing family history collection (individual level), and (2) clarification of roles and responsibilities in ordering and referral practices in genetic counseling and genetic testing for better healthcare management (organizational level).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jalila Jbilou
- Centre de formation médicale du Nouveau-Brunswick, Université de Moncton, Moncton, N.B., Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Blanchette PS, Spreafico A, Miller FA, Chan K, Bytautas J, Kang S, Bedard PL, Eisen A, Potanina L, Holland J, Kamel-Reid S, McPherson JD, Razak AR, Siu LL. Genomic testing in cancer: patient knowledge, attitudes, and expectations. Cancer 2014; 120:3066-73. [PMID: 24962202 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2014] [Revised: 03/25/2014] [Accepted: 03/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic testing in cancer (GTC) characterizes genes that play an important role in the development and growth of a patient's cancer. This form of DNA testing is currently being studied for its ability to guide cancer therapy. The objective of the current study was to describe patients' knowledge, attitudes, and expectations toward GTC. METHODS A 42-item self-administered GTC questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary group and patient pretesting. The questionnaire was distributed to patients with advanced cancer who were referred to the Princess Margaret Cancer Center for a phase 1 clinical trial or GTC testing. RESULTS Results were reported from 98 patients with advanced cancer, representing 66% of the patients surveyed. Seventy-six percent of patients were interested in learning more about GTC, and 64% reported that GTC would significantly improve their cancer care. The median score on a 12-item questionnaire to assess knowledge of cancer genomics was 8 of 12 items correct (67%; interquartile range, 7-9 of 12 items correct [58%-75%]). Scores were associated significantly with patients' education level (P < .0001). Sixty-six percent of patients would consent to a needle biopsy, and 39% would consent to an invasive surgical biopsy if required for GTC. Only 48% of patients reported having sufficient knowledge to make an informed decision to pursue GTC whereas 34% of patients indicated a need for formal genetic counseling. CONCLUSIONS Patients with advanced cancer are motivated to participate in GTC. Patients require further education to understand the difference between somatic and germline mutations in the context of GTC. Educational programs are needed to support patients interested in pursuing GTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip S Blanchette
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|