1
|
Aworinde J, Evans CJ, Gillam J, Ramsenthaler C, Davies N, Ellis‐Smith C. Co-design of the EMBED-Care Framework as an intervention to enhance shared decision-making for people affected by dementia and practitioners, comprising holistic assessment, linked with clinical decision support tools: A qualitative study. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13987. [PMID: 38343168 PMCID: PMC10859658 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shared decision-making intends to align care provision with individuals' preferences. However, the involvement of people living with dementia in decision-making about their care varies. We aimed to co-design the EMBED-Care Framework, to enhance shared decision-making between people affected by dementia and practitioners. METHODS A theory and evidence driven co-design study was conducted, using iterative workshops, informed by a theoretical model of shared decision-making and the EMBED-Care Framework (the intervention) for person-centred holistic palliative dementia care. The intervention incorporates a holistic outcome measure for assessment and review, linked with clinical decision-support tools to support shared decision-making. We drew on the Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Participants included people with dementia of any type, current or bereaved family carers and practitioners. We recruited via established dementia groups and research and clinical networks. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to explore how and when the intervention could enhance communication and shared decision-making, and the requirements for use, presented as a logic model. RESULTS Five co-design workshops were undertaken with participants comprising people affected by dementia (n = 18) and practitioners (n = 36). Three themes were generated, comprising: (1) 'knowing the person and personalisation of care', involving the person with dementia and/or family carer identifying the needs of the person using a holistic assessment. (2) 'engaging and considering the perspectives of all involved in decision-making' required listening to the person and the family to understand their priorities, and to manage multiple preferences. (3) 'Training and support activities' to use the Framework through use of animated videos to convey information, such as to understand the outcome measure used to assess symptoms. CONCLUSIONS The intervention developed sought to enhance shared decision-making with individuals affected by dementia and practitioners, through increased shared knowledge of individual priorities and choices for care and treatment. The workshops generated understanding to manage disagreements in determining priorities. Practitioners require face-to-face training on the intervention, and on communication to manage sensitive conversations about symptoms, care and treatment with individuals and their family. The findings informed the construction of a logic model to illustrate how the intervention is intended to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesutofunmi Aworinde
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Catherine J. Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustBrightonUK
| | - Juliet Gillam
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Christina Ramsenthaler
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Health SciencesZurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)WinterthurSwitzerland
- Hull York Medical School, Wolfson Palliative Care Research CentreUniversity of HullHullEngland
| | - Nathan Davies
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population HealthCentre for Aging Population Studies, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - Clare Ellis‐Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Inagaki N, Seto N, Lee K, Takahashi Y, Nakayama T, Hayashi Y. The role of critical care nurses in shared decision-making for patients with severe heart failure: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288978. [PMID: 37471342 PMCID: PMC10358911 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Patients with severe heart failure undergo highly invasive and advanced therapies with uncertain treatment outcomes. For these patients, shared decision-making is necessary. To date, the nursing perspective of the decision-making process for patients facing difficulties and how nurses can support patients in this process have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to clarify the perceptions of critical care nurses regarding situations with patients with severe heart failure that require difficult decision-making, and their role in supporting these patients. METHODS Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 certified nurse specialists in critical care nursing at nine hospitals in Japan. A qualitative inductive method was used and the derived relationships among the themes were visually structured and represented. RESULTS The nurses' perceptions on patients' difficult situations in decision-making were identified as follows: painful decisions under uncertainties; tense relationships; wavering emotions during decision-making; difficulties in coping with worsening medical conditions; patients' wishes that are difficult to realize or estimate; and difficulties in transitioning from advanced medical care. Critical care nurses' roles were summarized into six themes and performed collaboratively within the nursing team. Of these, the search for meaning and value was fundamental. Two positions underpin the role of critical care nurses. The first aims to provide direct support and includes partnerships and rights advocacy. The second aims to provide a holistic perspective to enable necessary adjustments, as indicated by situation assessments and mediation. By crossing various boundaries, co-creating, and forming a good circular relationship in the search for meaning and values, the possibility of expanding treatment and recuperation options may be considered. CONCLUSIONS Patients with severe heart failure have difficulty participating in shared decision-making. Critical care nurses should collaborate within the nursing team to improve interprofessional shared decision-making by providing decisional support to patients that focuses on values and meaning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriko Inagaki
- Graduate School of Nursing, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | - Natsuko Seto
- Graduate School of Nursing, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kumsun Lee
- Graduate School of Nursing, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshimitsu Takahashi
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takeo Nakayama
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuko Hayashi
- Graduate School of Nursing, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gallée J, Cartwright J, Volkmer A, Whitworth A, Hersh D. "Please Don't Assess Him to Destruction": The R.A.I.S.E. Assessment Framework for Primary Progressive Aphasia. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 32:391-410. [PMID: 36763839 DOI: 10.1044/2022_ajslp-22-00122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) assess people with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) through measurements of speech, language, communication, and well-being, with the aims of identifying challenges and strengths, monitoring change, and informing treatment directions and supports. The purpose of this clinical focus article is to highlight the necessity for person-centered assessment specific to PPA and to conceptualize a framework that acknowledges the multifaceted nature of assessment for this population. In this framework, the unique challenges posed by a diagnosis of PPA are addressed with the aim to provide practical guidance for clinicians and to support reflection on current practices. METHOD In clinical and research practice, assessment of people with PPA requires an ever-evolving approach that is centered on the client. In this clinical focus article, a discussion-based consensus process was used to synthesize authentic longitudinal experiences of people with PPA to explore assessment approaches, tools, and philosophies. RESULTS This analysis of person-centered assessment identifies seven essential components of assessment in PPA that set the foundation for the five steps of the R.A.I.S.E. Assessment framework. These components each contribute to a clear definition of assessment that reveals clients' competencies with a strengths-based focus; prioritizes the reciprocity of benefits; promotes dynamic assessment; and recognizes the complexity, evolution of assessment over time, and advocacy. CONCLUSIONS This clinical focus article takes a novel look at assessment in PPA by stepping away from assessment practices that focus on revealing deficits and decline and, instead, provides practical recommendations through the conceptualization of a PPA-specific assessment framework. The R.A.I.S.E. Assessment framework is grounded in principles of uplifting clients through person-centered assessment, keeps pace with best practice in PPA intervention, and contributes to a supportive experience for clients and families in the face of a progressive diagnosis over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Gallée
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA
- Evergreen Speech & Hearing Clinic, Redmond, WA
| | - Jade Cartwright
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia
| | - Anna Volkmer
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Whitworth
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia
| | - Deborah Hersh
- Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Speech Pathology, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, Adelaide University, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aworinde J, Ellis‐Smith C, Gillam J, Roche M, Coombes L, Yorganci E, Evans CJ. How do person-centered outcome measures enable shared decision-making for people with dementia and family carers?-A systematic review. ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA (NEW YORK, N. Y.) 2022; 8:e12304. [PMID: 35676942 PMCID: PMC9169867 DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To identify published evidence on person-centered outcome measures (PCOMs) used in dementia care and to explore how PCOMs facilitate shared decision-making and improve outcomes of care. To build a logic model based on the findings, depicting linkages with PCOM impact mechanisms and care outcomes. Design Mixed-methods systematic review. We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ASSIA from databases and included studies reporting experiences and/or impact of PCOM use among people with dementia, family carers, and/or practitioners. Groen Van de Ven's model of collaborative deliberation informed the elements of shared decision-making in dementia care in the abstraction, analysis, and interpretation of data. Data were narratively synthesized to develop the logic model. Setting Studies were conducted in long-term care, mixed settings, emergency department, general primary care, and geriatric clinics. Participants A total of 1064 participants were included in the review. Results Ten studies were included. PCOMs can facilitate shared decision-making through "knowing the person," "identifying problems, priorities for care and treatment and goal setting," "evaluating decisions", and "implementation considerations for PCOM use." Weak evidence on the impact of PCOMs to improve communication between individuals and practitioners, physical function, and activities of daily living. Conclusions PCOMs can enable shared decision-making and impact outcomes through facilitating collaborative working between the person's network of family and practitioners to identify and manage symptoms and concerns. The constructed logic model demonstrates the key mechanisms to discuss priorities for care and treatment, and to evaluate decisions and outcomes. A future area of research is training for family carers to use PCOMs with practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesutofunmi Aworinde
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Clare Ellis‐Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Juliet Gillam
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Moïse Roche
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Lucy Coombes
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustSuttonUK
| | - Emel Yorganci
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Catherine J. Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & RehabilitationKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustBrightonUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Steen JT, Heck S, Juffermans CC, Garvelink MM, Achterberg WP, Clayton J, Thompson G, Koopmans RT, van der Linden YM. Practitioners' perceptions of acceptability of a question prompt list about palliative care for advance care planning with people living with dementia and their family caregivers: a mixed-methods evaluation study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044591. [PMID: 33846153 PMCID: PMC8048016 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In oncology and palliative care, patient question prompt lists (QPLs) with sample questions for patient and family increased patients' involvement in decision-making and improved outcomes if physicians actively endorsed asking questions. Therefore, we aim to evaluate practitioners' perceptions of acceptability and possible use of a QPL about palliative and end-of-life care in dementia. DESIGN Mixed-methods evaluation study of a QPL developed with family caregivers and experts comprising a survey and interviews with practitioners. SETTING Two academic medical training centres for primary and long-term care in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS Practitioners (n=66; 73% woman; mean of 21 (SD 11) years of experience) who were mostly general practitioners and elderly care physicians. OUTCOMES The main survey outcome was acceptability measured with a 15-75 acceptability scale with ≥45 meaning 'acceptable'. RESULTS The survey response rate was 21% (66 of 320 participated). The QPL was regarded as acceptable (mean 51, SD 10) but 64% felt it was too long. Thirty-five per cent would want training to be able to answer the questions. Those who felt unable to answer (31%) found the QPL less acceptable (mean 46 vs 54 for others; p=0.015). We identified three themes from nine interviews: (1) enhancing conversations through discussing difficult topics, (2) proactively engaging in end-of-life conversations and (3) possible implementation. CONCLUSION Acceptability of the QPL was adequate, but physicians feeling confident to be able to address questions about end-of-life care is crucial when implementing it in practice, and may require training. To facilitate discussions of advance care planning and palliative care, families and persons with dementia should also be empowered to access the QPL themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny T van der Steen
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sten Heck
- Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carla Cm Juffermans
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wilco P Achterberg
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Josephine Clayton
- Centre for Learning & Research in Palliative Care, Hammond Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Northern Clinical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Genevieve Thompson
- College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Raymond Tcm Koopmans
- Primary and Community Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tuijt R, Rees J, Frost R, Wilcock J. Exploring how triads of people living with dementia, carers and health care professionals function in dementia health care: A systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis. DEMENTIA 2021; 20:1080-1104. [PMID: 32212862 PMCID: PMC8047709 DOI: 10.1177/1471301220915068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many qualitative studies report the post-diagnostic care experiences of carers and people living with dementia; however, this is not often accompanied by opportunities to hear the corresponding views of their health care professionals and how this triadic relationship functions. The aim of this review was to identify and thematically synthesize the experiences of health care services reported by people living with dementia, their carers and health care professionals. METHODS Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to 31 July 2019 for qualitative research including people living with dementia, carers and health care professionals. Data were coded and thematically synthesised using NVivo. RESULTS Of 10,045 search results, 29 papers relating to 27 studies were included in the final synthesis, including 261 people living with dementia, 444 carers and 530 health care professionals. Six themes emerged related to the functioning of a dementia care triad: (1) involving the person living with dementia, (2) establishing expectations of care and the roles of the members of the triad, (3) building trust, (4) effective communication, (5) continuity of care and (6) understanding the unique relationship dynamics within each triad. DISCUSSION The interactions and complexity of triadic dementia care relationships further our understanding of how to improve dementia care. Awareness of possible diverging attitudes highlights areas of necessary improvement and further research into facilitating engagement, such as when multiple professionals are involved or where there are mismatched expectations of the roles of triad members. In order to operate efficiently as a triad member, professionals should be aware of how pre-existing relations can influence the composition of a triad, encourage the involvement of the person living with dementia, clarify the expectations of all parties, establish trusting relationships and enable communication within the direct triad and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remco Tuijt
- Remco Tuijt, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lawani MA, Turgeon Y, Côté L, Légaré F, Witteman HO, Morin M, Kroger E, Voyer P, Rodriguez C, Giguere A. User-centered and theory-based design of a professional training program on shared decision-making with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders: a mixed-methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:59. [PMID: 33596874 PMCID: PMC7888116 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01396-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We know little about the best approaches to design training for healthcare professionals. We thus studied how user-centered and theory-based design contribute to the development of a distance learning program for professionals, to increase their shared decision-making (SDM) with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders and their caregivers. METHODS In this mixed-methods study, healthcare professionals who worked in family medicine clinics and homecare services evaluated a training program in a user-centered approach with several iterative phases of quantitative and qualitative evaluation, each followed by modifications. The program comprised an e-learning activity and five evidence summaries. A subsample assessed the e-learning activity during semi-structured think-aloud sessions. A second subsample assessed the evidence summaries they received by email. All participants completed a theory-based questionnaire to assess their intention to adopt SDM. Descriptive statistical analyses and qualitative thematic analyses were integrated at each round to prioritize training improvements with regard to the determinants most likely to influence participants' intention. RESULTS Of 106 participants, 98 completed their evaluations of either the e-learning activity or evidence summary (93%). The professions most represented were physicians (60%) and nurses (15%). Professionals valued the e-learning component to gain knowledge on the theory and practice of SDM, and the evidence summaries to apply the knowledge gained through the e-learning activity to diverse clinical contexts. The iterative design process allowed addressing most weaknesses reported. Participants' intentions to adopt SDM and to use the summaries were high at baseline and remained positive as the rounds progressed. Attitude and social influence significantly influenced participants' intention to use the evidence summaries (P < 0.0001). Despite strong intention and the tailoring of tools to users, certain factors external to the training program can still influence the effective use of these tools and the adoption of SDM in practice. CONCLUSIONS A theory-based and user-centered design approach for continuing professional development interventions on SDM with older adults living with neurocognitive disorders and their caregivers appeared useful to identify the most important determinants of learners' intentions to use SDM in their practice, and validate our initial interpretations of learners' assessments during the subsequent evaluation round.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moulikatou Adouni Lawani
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Yves Turgeon
- CISSS de la Gaspésie – Service externe de gériatrie ambulatoire, 455 rue Mgr Ross Est, Chandler, QC G0C 1K0 Canada
| | - Luc Côté
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 1323, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 4th floor, Room 4578, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| | - Holly O. Witteman
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 2881, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Michèle Morin
- Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 4211, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kroger
- Quebec Excellence Centre in Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, 1050 chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec, QC G1S 4L8 Canada
| | - Philippe Voyer
- Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Room 3445, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Charo Rodriguez
- Departmentof Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Montreal, QC H3S 1Z1 Canada
| | - Anik Giguere
- VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health, Pavillon Landry-Poulin, Door A-1-2, 2nd floor, Room 2416, 2525 Chemin de la Canardière, Québec, QC G1J 0A4 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wied TS, Haberstroh J, Gather J, Karakaya T, Oswald F, Qubad M, Scholten M, Vollmann J, Pantel J. Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:780276. [PMID: 34867561 PMCID: PMC8635234 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.780276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The right to make autonomous decisions is enshrined in law. However, the question how persons with cognitive deficits can be enabled to make autonomous decisions has not been satisfactorily addressed. In particular, the concept of supported decision-making and its implementation into practice has been poorly explored for persons with dementia (PwD).This article describes the empirical development and implementation of support tools to enhance informed consent processes (so called enhanced consent procedures/ECP) for PwD on whether to undergo lumbar puncture. In the end of the process of pilot testing and further development of the tools, the following tools were defined: (1) Standardized Interview Structure, (2) Elaborated Plain Language, (3) Ambience and Room Design, (4) Keyword Lists, (5) Priority Cards, (6) Visualization, and (7) Simplified Written Informed Consent (Patient Information), as well as the general attitude (8) Person-Centered Attitude of the facilitator. As the development, implementation and evaluation of ECP tools is one objective of the transnational ENSURE project, we also include an overview of future empirical procedures. So far, our findings can serve as a selection of possibilities to support PwD in decision-making and help practitioners achieve an appropriate balance between the autonomy and protection of PwD in complex decision-making situation. Future studies should address the question if the proposed set of tools is effective to enhance informed consent processes in PwD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa S Wied
- Geriatric Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Julia Haberstroh
- Psychological Aging Research, Institute of Psychology, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany
| | - Jakov Gather
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Tarik Karakaya
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Frank Oswald
- Interdisciplinary Ageing Research, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mishal Qubad
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Matthé Scholten
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jochen Vollmann
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Johannes Pantel
- Geriatric Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wehrmann H, Michalowsky B, Lepper S, Mohr W, Raedke A, Hoffmann W. Priorities and Preferences of People Living with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment - A Systematic Review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:2793-2807. [PMID: 34934309 PMCID: PMC8684431 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s333923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Knowledge about the priorities and preferences of people living with dementia (PwD) might help to individualize treatment, care, and support, which could improve patient-related outcomes. This study aimed to summarize preferences of PwD or people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), considering all relevant aspects of health care and everyday life. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature review and included studies about patient preferences published in English between January 1, 1990 and October 28, 2019. The inclusion criteria were that preferences were elicited directly by PwD or patients with MCI. We used the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Management value set for dementia to categorize the preferences into the following topics: a) clinical status, b) symptoms, functioning, and quality of life, and c) sustainability of care. RESULTS Of 578 initially identified studies, 45 met the inclusion criteria. Patients preferred to be informed about the diagnosis as early as possible, especially for anticipatory care planning. They ranked caregiver quality of life as their highest priority. They preferred not to be a burden to others more than their caregivers' mood, their own functional status, or their own distressing behaviors. Furthermore, PwD are eager to participate in medical decisions, especially in those about creating an everyday life routine. PwD preferred their own quality of life, self-efficacy, and emotional well-being. Institutionalized PwD preferred individualized and person-centered care. According to the sustainability of care, PwD preferred to maintain close bonds with their family at the end of their life and wanted to be treated with empathy. CONCLUSION This systematic review provides essential insights into cognitively impaired patients' preferences, which are rarely considered in treatment, care, and support services. Further studies should evaluate whether considering preferences in treatment and care or daily living can improve patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Wehrmann
- Translational Health Care Research, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bernhard Michalowsky
- Translational Health Care Research, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Correspondence: Bernhard Michalowsky Tel +49 3834 86 75 07 Email
| | - Simon Lepper
- Translational Health Care Research, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Wiebke Mohr
- Translational Health Care Research, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Anika Raedke
- Translational Health Care Research, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hoffmann
- Translational Health Care Research, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine & University Medicine Greifswald (UMG), Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Action Research as a Method to Find Solutions for the Burden of Caregiving at Hospital Discharge. SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s11213-019-09486-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
11
|
Ries NM. Enduring Powers of Attorney and Financial Exploitation of Older People: A Conceptual Analysis and Strategies for Prevention. J Aging Soc Policy 2019; 34:357-374. [PMID: 31847789 DOI: 10.1080/08959420.2019.1704143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Enduring powers of attorney (POAs) are commonly used legal instruments that enable older people to plan for asset management in the event of future incapacity. The policy objective of POAs - empowering control over money and property - are frustrated when POAs are misused to financially exploit older people. This commentary integrates theory and evidence to propose a conceptual framework for POA-facilitated financial exploitation (POA-FE). Identified risk factors include inadequate knowledge about the POA role; family conflicts; attitudes of entitlement; and lack of planning and preparation for financial decision-making. POA-FE occurs on a continuum of behavior and strategies for preventing POA-FE are suggested using strengths-based approaches for older people and their attorneys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nola M Ries
- Law Health Justice Research Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wittenberg Y, de Boer A, Plaisier I, Verhoeff A, Kwekkeboom R. Informal caregivers' judgements on sharing care with home care professionals from an intersectional perspective: the influence of personal and situational characteristics. Scand J Caring Sci 2019; 33:1006-1016. [PMID: 31037751 PMCID: PMC6988496 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The European policy emphasis on providing informal care at home causes caregivers and home care professionals having more contact with each other, which makes it important for them to find satisfying ways to share care. Findings from the literature show that sharing care between caregivers and professionals can be improved. This study therefore examines to what degree and why caregivers' judgements on sharing care with home care professionals vary. To improve our understanding of social inequities in caregiving experiences, the study adopts an intersectional perspective. We investigate how personal and situational characteristics attached to care judgements are interwoven. Using data of the Netherlands Institute for Social Research, we conducted bivariate and multivariate linear regression analysis (N = 292). We combined four survey questions into a 1-4 scale on 'caregiver judgement' (α = 0.69) and used caregivers' personal (such as gender and health status) and situational characteristics (such as the care recipient's impairment and type of care) as determinants to discern whether these are related to the caregivers' judgement. Using a multiplicative approach, we also examined the relationship between mutually constituting factors of the caregivers' judgement. Adjusted for all characteristics, caregivers who provide care to a parent or child with a mental impairment and those aged between 45 and 64 years or with a paid job providing care to someone with a mental impairment are likely to judge sharing care more negatively. Also, men providing care with help from other caregivers and caregivers providing care because they like to do so who provide domestic help seem more likely to be less satisfied about sharing care. This knowledge is vital for professionals providing home care, because it clarifies differences in caregivers' experiences and hence induce knowledge how to pay special attention to those who may experience less satisfaction while sharing care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvette Wittenberg
- Faculty of Social and Behavioural SciencesUniversity of Amsterdam and Faculty of Applied Social Sciences and LawAmsterdam University of Applied SciencesAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Alice de Boer
- Faculty of Social SciencesVU Amsterdam and The Netherlands Institute for Social ResearchThe HagueNetherlands
| | - Inger Plaisier
- The Netherlands Institute for Social ResearchThe HagueNetherlands
| | - Arnoud Verhoeff
- Faculty of Social and Behavioural SciencesUniversity of Amsterdam and Public Health Service AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
| | - Rick Kwekkeboom
- Faculty of Applied Social Sciences and LawAmsterdam University of Applied SciencesAmsterdamNetherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Griffin JM, Riffin C, Havyer RD, Biggar VS, Comer M, Frangiosa TL, Bangerter LR. Integrating Family Caregivers of People With Alzheimer's Disease and Dementias into Clinical Appointments: Identifying Potential Best Practices. J Appl Gerontol 2019; 39:1184-1194. [PMID: 31603041 PMCID: PMC7454004 DOI: 10.1177/0733464819880449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Family caregiver engagement in clinical encounters can promote relationship-centered care and optimize outcomes for people with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Little is known, however, about effective ways for health care providers to engage family caregivers in clinical appointments to provide the highest quality care. We describe what caregivers of people with ADRD and people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) consider potential best practices for engaging caregivers as partners in clinical appointments. Seven online focus groups were convened. Three groups included spousal caregivers (n = 42), three included non-spousal caregivers (n = 36), and one included people with MCI (n = 15). Seven potential best practices were identified, including the following: "acknowledge caregivers' role and assess unmet needs and capacity to care" and "communicate directly with person with ADRD yet provide opportunities for caregivers to have separate interactions with providers." Participants outlined concrete steps for providers and health care systems to improve care delivery quality for people with ADRD.
Collapse
|
14
|
Luig T, Elwyn G, Anderson R, Campbell-Scherer DL. Facing obesity: Adapting the collaborative deliberation model to deal with a complex long-term problem. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:291-300. [PMID: 30292424 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Care communication about obesity needs to respond to the complex biopsychosocial processes that affect weight and health. The collaborative deliberation model conceptualizes interpersonal work that underpins empathic communication and shared decision-making. The goal of this study was to elucidate how primary care practitioners can use the model to achieve shared obesity assessment and care planning. METHODS This qualitative study used direct observation of clinical encounters with twenty patients with obesity sampled for maximum variation in context, semi-structured patient and provider interviews, patient journals and two follow-up interviews over eight weeks. Themes were compared to the original model. RESULTS We identified five processes that may be relevant for collaborative deliberation about obesity in addition to the original model: (1) Exploring the story, (2) Reframing the story, (3) Co-constructing a new story, (4) Choosing a priority, and (5) Experimenting with alternatives. CONCLUSIONS We propose an enhanced collaborative deliberation model for obesity that describes the interpersonal work needed before and after deliberation about preferences and courses of action. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The enhanced model can support clinicians in achieving meaningful conversations about obesity and complex chronic disease resulting in care plans that are responsive to and achievable in the patient's lifeworld.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thea Luig
- Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Center for Health Care Delivery Science, Dartmouth College, USA.
| | - Robin Anderson
- Edmonton Southside Primary Care Network, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Denise L Campbell-Scherer
- Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Alberta Diabetes Institute, Edmonton, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Giguere AMC, Lawani MA, Fortier-Brochu É, Carmichael PH, Légaré F, Kröger E, Witteman HO, Voyer P, Caron D, Rodríguez C. Tailoring and evaluating an intervention to improve shared decision-making among seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and healthcare providers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2018; 19:332. [PMID: 29941020 PMCID: PMC6019313 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia raises new challenges to ensure that healthcare decisions are informed by research evidence and reflect what is important for seniors and their caregivers. Therefore, we aim to evaluate a tailored intervention to help healthcare providers empower seniors and their caregivers in making health-related decisions. Methods In two phases, we will: (1) design and tailor the intervention; and (2) implement and evaluate it. We will use theory and user-centered design to tailor an intervention comprising a distance professional training program on shared decision-making and five shared decision-making tools dealing with difficult decisions often faced by seniors with dementia and their caregivers. Each tool will be designed in two versions, one for clinicians and one for patients. We will recruit 49 clinicians and 27 senior/caregiver to participate in three cycles of design-evaluation-feedback of each intervention components. Besides think-aloud and interview approaches, users will also complete questionnaires based on the Theory of Planned Behavior to identify the factors most likely to influence their adoption of shared decision-making after exposure to the intervention. We will then modify the intervention by adding/enhancing behavior-change techniques targeting these factors. We will evaluate the effectiveness of this tailored intervention before/after implementation, in a two-armed, clustered randomized trial. We will enroll a convenience sample of six primary care clinics (unit of randomization) in the province of Quebec and recruit the clinicians who practice there (mostly family physicians, nurses, and social workers). These clinics will then be randomized to immediate exposure to the intervention or delayed exposure. Overall, we will recruit 180 seniors with dementia, their caregivers, and their healthcare providers. We will evaluate the impact of the intervention on patient involvement in the decision-making process, decisional comfort, patient and caregiver personal empowerment in relation to their own healthcare, patient quality of life, caregiver burden, and decisional regret. Discussion The intervention will empower patients and their caregivers in their healthcare, by fostering their participation as partners during the decision-making process and by ensuring they make informed decisions congruent with their values and priorities. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.org, NCT02956694. Registered on 31 October 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2697-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anik M C Giguere
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada. .,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. .,Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. .,Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec city, QC, Canada.
| | - Moulikatou Adouni Lawani
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Émilie Fortier-Brochu
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Laval University Research Centre on Primary Care and Services, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pierre-Hugues Carmichael
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Edeltraut Kröger
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec city, QC, Canada.,Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-30, 1050, Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC, G1S 4L8, Canada
| | - Holly O Witteman
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.,Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Research Axis of Population Health and Practice-Changing Research Group, CHU de Quebec Research Centre, Quebec city, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe Voyer
- Quebec Centre for Excellence on Aging, St-Sacrement Hospital, Room L2-21, 1050, chemin Sainte-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.,Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050, avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Danielle Caron
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, room 2881-C, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Quebec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Charo Rodríguez
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, 5858 chemin de la Cote-des-Neiges, 3rd floor, Suite 300, Room 328, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|