Bleeding risk under selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Should rTMS be considered a first-line treatment for major depressive episodes in adults?

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is an epidemic with rising social, economic, and political costs. In a patient whose major depressive episode (MDE) persists through an adequate antidepressant trial, insurance companies often cover alternative treatments which may include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). RTMS is an FDA-cleared neuromodulation technique for TRD which is safe, efficacious, noninvasive, and well-tolerated. Recent developments in the optimization of rTMS algorithms and targeting have increased the efficacy of rTMS in treating depression, improved the clinical convenience of these treatments, and decreased the cost of a course of rTMS. In this opinion paper, we make a case for why conventional FDA-cleared rTMS should be considered as a first-line treatment for all adult MDEs. RTMS is compared to other first-line treatments including psychotherapy and SSRIs. These observations suggest that rTMS has similar efficacy, fewer side-effects, lower risk of serious adverse events, comparable compliance, the potential for more rapid relief, and cost-effectiveness. This suggestion, however, would be strengthened by further research with an emphasis on treatment-naive subjects in their first depressive episode, and trials directly contrasting rTMS with SSRIs or psychotherapy.

Preoperative SSRI use increases perioperative transfusion need in patients undergoing surgical procedures on the hip joint

PURPOSE

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly prescribed for psychiatric conditions. Previous studies have shown that SSRIs can increase bleeding risk by affecting platelet aggregation. However, their impact on perioperative outcomes in hip surgery remains uncertain. This case-control study examines the link between preoperative SSRI use and perioperative transfusion requirements in hip surgery patients.

METHODS

Data from the M161Ortho dataset of Pearl Diver patient records database were utilized. Patients who underwent hip joint surgery between 2010 and 2022 and had documented preoperative SSRI use within one month prior to surgery were included. Patients with coagulopathy disorders or coagulopathy medication use were excluded. Perioperative transfusion need was defined as receiving red blood cell or whole blood transfusions on the same date or within 10 days following the surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 75,374 patients with preoperative SSRI use were matched with an equal number of non-SSRI users. Preoperative SSRI use was associated with an increased risk of requiring perioperative transfusion (5.7% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated increased transfusion risk in patients undergoing pinning (2.6% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.02), open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) (8.9% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.007), and total hip arthroplasty (THA) (3.8% vs. 3.4%, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware of the potential risk of increased perioperative transfusion requirements in hip surgery patients using SSRIs, especially during pinning, ORIF, and THA procedures. It is essential to consider this when managing patients on SSRIs before hip surgery.

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)®: Recommendations for the Mitigation of Complications of Neurostimulation

INTRODUCTION

The International Neuromodulation Society convened a multispecialty group of physicians based on expertise and international representation to establish evidence-based guidance on the mitigation of neuromodulation complications. This Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC)® project intends to update evidence-based guidance and offer expert opinion that will improve efficacy and safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Authors were chosen on the basis of their clinical expertise, familiarity with the peer-reviewed literature, research productivity, and contributions to the neuromodulation literature. Section leaders supervised literature searches of MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed from 2017 (when NACC last published guidelines) to October 2023. Identified studies were graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force criteria for evidence and certainty of net benefit. Recommendations are based on the strength of evidence or consensus when evidence was scant.

RESULTS

The NACC examined the published literature and established evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to guide best practices. Additional guidance will occur as new evidence is developed in future iterations of this process.

CONCLUSIONS

The NACC recommends best practices regarding the mitigation of complications associated with neurostimulation to improve safety and efficacy. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations should be used as a guide to assist decision-making when clinically appropriate.

Sodium hypochlorite accident diagnosis and management: Analysis from the literature and the French pharmacovigilance database

PURPOSE

Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is considered as the reference irrigation solution in endodontics. However, NaOCl-related accidents may occur, and non-dentist health professionals might under-recognize this rare adverse effect although it is potentially severe, with possible medical and aesthetic sequelae. We performed a literature review to provide to non-dentist healthcare professionals a large picture of symptoms, management and potential consequences of NaOCl accidents.

METHODS

We queried PubMed and the French Pharmacovigilance database and retrieved 76 cases for analysis (70 from 57 published articles, and six from the database).

RESULTS

The analysis showed that patients were mostly women (79%), aged around of 42 years, undergoing upper jawbone (74%) endodontic procedure. NaOCl concentration ranged from 1% to 10%, with 0.5 to 30 mL injected. Most cases (86%) corresponded to an accidental extrusion beyond the root apex to the periapical tissues, followed by tissular injection by error (8%) and extrusion into the maxillary sinus (3%). Local symptoms always occurred within 24 h, mostly pain (99%), edema (89%) and/or ecchymosis (61%). Complications were mainly neurological (29%), necrotic (22%) and cutaneous (9%). Most of patients (76%) fully recovered after medical management but 18 (24%) required surgical management.

CONCLUSION

Any healthcare professional should be aware of the classical symptomatic triad of NaOCl accident with sudden pain, haemorrhage/ecchymosis and swelling, to start or recommend adequate management. Patients should be reassured, but a close follow-up is necessary to avoid delayed complication.

Feeling blue to seeing red: A case of escitalopram-induced epistaxis

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are associated with an increased risk of bleeding, most commonly intracranial and gastric bleeding, especially in conjunction with anticoagulant use. Although uncommon, escitalopram is associated with epistaxis in a dose-dependent manner. Dosage reduction may be sufficient in management.

Understanding Antithrombotic Agents for Rehabilitation Therapy: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

In rehabilitation medicine, attention must be paid to the medication. Among them, antithrombotic drugs are used for the initial treatment and secondary prevention of stroke, so as a basic knowledge, the pharmacological actions, characteristics, indications, and precautions for the use of antithrombotic drugs should be known. Antithrombotic agents are divided into antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and the appropriate antithrombotic agent is selected according to the main disease or condition. Antiplatelet agents include aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and cilostazol. Each antiplatelet agent has a different mechanism of action, characteristics, and indications, and should be prescribed with due consideration. Anticoagulants include heparin, synthetic Xa inhibitors, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), synthetic antithrombin agents, and warfarin. Knowledge of the mechanism of action, characteristics, and indications of each anticoagulant is necessary, as well as monitoring and dose adjustment. With regard to ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICD) and antithrombotic agents, the first step is to classify cerebral infarction and to determine whether antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants should be used. Bleeding and recurrence prevention are important considerations in the selection of appropriate antithrombotic agents for the pathophysiology of ICD.

Bleeding in patients on concurrent treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) compared with SSRI or low-dose ASA alone-A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to systematically review whether concurrent treatment with an SSRI and low-dose ASA increases the risk of bleeding compared with treatment with an SSRI alone or ASA alone.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Web of Science (from database inception to January 2023) were searched according to PICO: P = patients on treatment with an SSRI and/or low-dose ASA; I = intervention: SSRI + ASA; C = comparison: ASA or SSRI alone; O = outcomes: bleeding/major bleeding. The included articles were assessed using checklists. Studies without major risk of bias formed the basis for the conclusions. Extracted data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to GRADE.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies met the PICO and were included. One randomized and six nonrandomized studies were assessed not to have major risk of bias. Regarding SSRI + ASA vs. ASA only, the pooled hazard ratio of three nonrandomized studies (n = 38 467) was 1.37 (95% confidence interval: 1.10; 1.70; I2 = 0%), and the pooled odds ratio of two nonrandomized studies (n = 28 296) was 0.95 (0.77; 1.19; I2 = 0%). Regarding SSRI + ASA vs. SSRI only, the randomized controlled trial (n = 1048) reported a hazard ratio of 1.82 (0.66; 5.02), the hazard ratio being 1.60 (1.24; 2.06) for ASA vs. placebo in patients without SSRI treatment; and one nonrandomized controlled study (n = 18 920) reported an incidence rate ratio of 1.03 (0.96; 1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The compiled evidence was too uncertain to support an interaction when an SSRI is added to low-dose ASA. Low-dose ASA added to an SSRI may imply an increased risk of bleeding primarily attributable to the initiation of ASA.

Concomitant Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors With Oral Anticoagulants and Risk of Major Bleeding

Importance

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are commonly prescribed antidepressants associated with a small increased risk of major bleeding. However, the risk of bleeding associated with the concomitant use of SSRIs and oral anticoagulants (OACs) has not been well characterized.

Objectives

To assess whether concomitant use of SSRIs with OACs is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding compared with OAC use alone, describe how the risk varies with duration of use, and identify key clinical characteristics modifying this risk.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A population-based, nested case-control study was conducted among patients with atrial fibrillation initiating OACs between January 2, 1998, and March 29, 2021. Patients were from approximately 2000 general practices in the UK contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. With the use of risk-set sampling, for each case of major bleeding during follow-up, up to 30 controls were selected from risk sets defined by the case and matched on age, sex, cohort entry date, and follow-up duration.

Exposures

Concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs (direct OACs and vitamin K antagonists [VKAs]) compared with OAC use alone.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of hospitalization for bleeding or death due to bleeding.

Results

There were 42 190 patients with major bleeding (mean [SD] age, 74.2 [9.3] years; 59.8% men) matched to 1 156 641 controls (mean [SD] age, 74.2 [9.3] years; 59.8% men). Concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding compared with OACs alone (IRR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.24-1.42). The risk peaked during the initial months of treatment (first 30 days of use: IRR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.37-2.22) and persisted for up to 6 months. The risk did not vary with age, sex, history of bleeding, chronic kidney disease, and potency of SSRIs. An association was present both with concomitant use of SSRIs and direct OACs compared with direct OAC use alone (IRR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12-1.40) and concomitant use of SSRIs and VKAs compared with VKA use alone (IRR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25-1.47).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that among patients with atrial fibrillation, concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding compared with OAC use alone, requiring close monitoring and management of risk factors for bleeding, particularly in the first few months of use.

Association of antidepressants plus antithrombotics and bleeding risk: a pharmacovigilance study

AIM

The present study investigated the risk of bleeding when antidepressants are added to antithrombotics.

METHODS

Using data registered in VigiBase®, the WHO pharmacovigilance database, between 01/01/2000 and 31/12/2022, we compared the risk of reporting "serious" bleeding (Reporting Odds Ratio, ROR) with antidepressants + antithrombotics versus antithrombotics alone.

RESULTS

Increased values of ROR were found for the association Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SRIs) + Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) versus DOACs alone (ROR=1.49(1.17-1.89)). Similar results were found for Factor Xa inhibitors or Thrombin inhibitors. This association was also found for other antithrombotics: Vitamin K Antagonists (ROR=1.37(1.12-1.68)), Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors PAIs (ROR=1.38(1.21-1.57)) and Heparins (2.04(1.59-2.62)) but not with other antidepressants (Non-Selective Monoamine Reuptake Inhibitors, NSMRIs).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests an increased risk of "serious" bleeding when SRIs (but not NSMRIs) are associated with antithrombotics (all antithrombotics and not only DOACs).

Anti-coagulant Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis in Frail Patients: Impact of Frailties on the Management of Drug-Drug Interactions

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and anti-Xa direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs) are recommended for the long-term treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) based on well-documented randomised controlled trials. Anti-Xa DOACs are viewed as a first choice for the treatment of patients with CAT. A large number of drug-drug interactions have been reported between DOACs and chemotherapy drugs, modifying circulating levels of DOAC leading to fears of increased bleeding risks or thrombotic recurrence. Progresses in anti-neoplastic therapies have improved the prognosis and the survival, thus increasing the prevalence of frail patients with cancer. However, since frailties tend to be excluded from large trials due to multiple co-morbidities, current guidelines are not fully applicable to this population. The management of these frail patients with CAT is particularly complex and requires a risk assessment on a case-by-case basis with specific focus on cancer, patient-related risk factors and drug-drug interactions. In this brief review we have identified age, co-morbidities and co-medications as key factors of frailty that require careful attention and we have developed a therapeutic decision algorithm to help clinicians optimising the use of anti-coagulants in patients with cancer with CAT, especially in case of anti-Xa DOACs concomitant medications. With the evaluation of the bleeding risk according to the type of cancer, and anticipating drug-drug interactions intensity, taking into account patient frailties allows the optimisation of the anti-coagulant choice. A systematic collaboration between oncologists, vascular pathology specialists and pharmacists is warranted to ensure an optimal patient management. Clinical studies are needed to determine the real impact of these interactions.

CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles are not associated with higher prevalence of gastrointestinal bleeds in those who have been prescribed antidepressants: Analysis in a British-South Asian cohort

AIMS

CYP2C19 is a hepatic enzyme involved in the metabolism of antidepressants associated with increased gastrointestinal bleed (GIB) risk. The aim of our study was to explore a possible association between loss-of-function CYP2C19 genotypes and GIB in South Asian ancestry participants prescribed antidepressants.

METHODS

Genes & Health participants with a record in Barts Health NHS Trust (N 22 753) were studied using a cross-sectional approach. CYP2C19 diplotypes were assessed and metabolizer type inferred from consortia guidance. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the prevalence of GIB in different metabolizer categories. Multivariable regression was used to test for association between antidepressant prescriptions and GIB, and between CYP2C19 metabolizer state and GIB in the subcohort prescribed antidepressants.

RESULTS

Antidepressants were frequently prescribed (47%, N = 10 612). A total of 864 participants (4%) had a GIB; 534 (62%) had been prescribed a CYP2C19 metabolized antidepressant. There was an independent association between antidepressant prescriptions and GIB events (odds ratio 1.8, confidence interval 1.5-2.0, P < 0.0001). There was no relationship between CYP2C19 inferred poor (P 0.56) or intermediate (P 0.53) metabolizer status and GIB in those prescribed an antidepressant in unadjusted analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model did not show an independent association between poor (P 0.54) or intermediate (P 0.62) CYP2C19 metabolizers and GIB in the subcohort prescribed antidepressants.

CONCLUSIONS

CYP2C19 dependent antidepressants are associated with increased GIB prevalence. GIB appeared independent from CYP2C19 metabolizer genotype in individuals who had been prescribed antidepressants. Precision dosing based on CYP2C19 genetic information alone is unlikely to reduce GIB prevalence.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Other Treatment Modalities for Deep Space Missions

INTRODUCTION: As humankind ventures further into the depths of space, planning is already underway for long-duration exploration missions that will test the bounds of human performance. Deep space travel will include added risk related to stressors from the isolated, confined, and extreme environment that lies outside the boundaries of low Earth orbit. Currently, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are considered the standard of care for many mental health diagnoses, including anxiety and depression; however, SSRIs are also associated with several undesired side effects. The utility of nonpharmacological therapies for the management of behavioral health conditions has not yet been fully explored.METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed. Relevant articles pertaining to the psychological impacts of isolated, confined, and extreme environments, use of SSRIs in spaceflight, side effects associated with SSRIs, and nonpharmacological treatments for anxiety and depression were reviewed. Over 70 studies were reviewed in total.RESULTS: Reduced bone mineral density, impaired hemostatic function, significant individual variability resulting from gene polymorphisms, and drug-drug interactions are well described adverse effects of SSRIs that may complicate their operational use in the deep space environment. Four alternative therapies for the treatment of anxiety and depression may show promise for long duration missions.DISCUSSION: Although SSRIs have long been considered standard of care treatment for many behavioral health conditions, we cannot trivialize the risk that prolonged pharmacological therapy may pose. The need to mitigate these risks by exploring alternative therapies has never been more relevant.El-Khoury BB, Ray KL, Altchuler SI, Reichard JF, Dukes CH. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other treatment modalities for deep space missions. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(11):843-851.

Sex-Related Differences in Patient Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Symptomatology in Older Adults with Pulmonary Embolism: Findings from the SERIOUS-PE Study

Sex-specific factors are implicated in pulmonary embolism (PE) presentation in young patients, as indicated by increased risk in pregnancy. Whether sex differences exist in PE presentation, comorbidities, and symptomatology in older adults, the age group in which most PEs occur, remains unknown. We identified older adults (aged ≥65 years) with PE in a large international PE registry replete with information about relevant clinical characteristics (RIETE registry, 2001-2021). To provide national data from the United States, we assessed sex differences in clinical characteristics and risk factors of Medicare beneficiaries with PE (2001-2019). The majority of older adults with PE in RIETE (19,294/33,462, 57.7%) and in the Medicare database (551,492/948,823, 58.7%) were women. Compared with men, women with PE less frequently had atherosclerotic diseases, lung disease, cancer, or unprovoked PE, but more frequently had varicose veins, depression, prolonged immobility, or history of hormonal therapy (p < 0.001 for all). Women less often presented with chest pain (37.3 vs. 40.6%) or hemoptysis (2.4 vs. 5.6%) but more often with dyspnea (84.6 vs. 80.9%) (p < 0.001 for all). Measures of clot burden, PE risk stratification, and use of imaging modalities were comparable between women and men. PE is more common in elderly women than in men. Cancer and cardiovascular disease are more common in men, whereas transient provoking factors including trauma, immobility, or hormone therapy are more common in elderly women with PE. Whether such differences correlate with disparities in treatment or differences in short- or long-term clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.

Harder, better, faster, stronger? Retrospective chart review of adverse events of interactions between adaptogens and antidepressant drugs

Aim: We aimed to systematically evaluate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of adverse events associated with the adaptogens and antidepressant drug interactions in a retrospective chart review. Methodology: A total of 1,816 reports of adverse events were evaluated. Cases were included in the analysis if the pharmacoepidemiological analysis showed the presence of a high probability of a causal relationship between an adaptogen and antidepressant interaction and the occurrence of adverse events. The following data were extracted from the reports: age, sex, antidepressant, plant products containing adaptogens, other concomitant medications, and clinical consequences of the interactions and their possible mechanisms. Results: Adaptogens were involved in 9% of adverse events associated with the concomitant use of antidepressants and other preparations. We identified 30 reports in which side effects presented a causal relationship with the use of antidepressants and adaptogens. Here, we present the list of adaptogens with the corresponding antidepressants and the side effects caused by their interactions: Withania somnifera: reboxetine (testicle pain and ejaculatory dysfunctions), sertraline (severe diarrhea), escitalopram (myalgia, epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, restless legs syndrome, and severe cough), and paroxetine (generalized myalgia, ophthalmalgia, and ocular hypertension); Eleutherococcus senticosus: duloxetine (upper gastrointestinal bleeding), paroxetine (epistaxis), sertraline (vaginal hemorrhage), and agomelatine (irritability, agitation, headache, and dizziness); Schisandra chinensis: bupropion (arthralgia and thrombocytopenia), amitriptyline (delirium), and fluoxetine (dysuria); Tribulus terrestris: citalopram (generalized pruritus), escitalopram (galactorrhea), and trazodone (psoriasis relapse); Coptis chinensis: mianserin (arrhythmias), mirtazapine (edema of lower limbs and myalgia), and fluoxetine (gynecomastia); Cimicifuga racemosa: mianserin (restless legs syndrome), paroxetine (gynecomastia and mastalgia), and venlafaxine (hyponatremia); Bacopa monnieri: agomelatine (back pain and hyperhidrosis) and moclobemide (myocardial infarction); Gynostemma pentaphyllum: duloxetine (back pain); Cordyceps sinensis: sertraline (upper gastrointestinal bleeding); Lepidium meyenii: mianserin (restless legs syndrome); and Scutellaria baicalensis: bupropion (seizures). Conclusion: Clinicians should monitor the adverse events associated with the concomitant use of adaptogens and antidepressant drugs in patients with mental disorders. Aggregation of side effects and pharmacokinetic interactions (inhibition of CYP and p-glycoprotein) between those medicines may result in clinically significant adverse events.

The association between comorbidities and disease activity in spondyloarthritis - A narrative review

Comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and depression, are more prevalent in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) than in the general population. Clinical and laboratory markers of disease activity are associated with numerous of these comorbidities, and studies suggest that the treatment of SpA can have a positive impact on comorbidities; conversely, managing comorbidities can improve disease activity. Therefore, the screening of comorbidities is considered a core component of a rheumatology consultation, and treatment should be performed in liaison with other health professionals (e.g. general physicians). Validated tools and questionnaires can be used for not only the detection but also the monitoring of potential comorbidities. Understanding whether a comorbidity is a separate disease entity, linked to SpA or its treatment, or an extra-musculoskeletal manifestation of the disease is important to identify the most appropriate treatment options.

Evaluation & Treatment of Psychological Effects of Stroke

Strokes are a common medical condition in the United States, including in Delaware. An under-recognized effect of stroke is the impact on mood that often occurs. Many individuals develop depression, anxiety, PTSD, and other psychological sequelae. These disorders can significantly affect their lives and their relationships. The emotional effects of stroke pose a public health problem for our residents, leading to devastating decreases in the quality of life for the patient and the family. These challenges negatively impact the community due to the associated healthcare and economic burdens. The population of the State of Delaware is growing, and the proportion of senior residents, who are also at greater risk for strokes, is also increasing. Strokes will remain an ongoing important clinical concern for our healthcare providers. Emotional changes after a stroke will occur in many Delaware residents who suffer a stroke. The emotional sequelae of stroke are under-treated. It is critical for healthcare professionals to be trained to recognize, assess, and treat the psychological disorders that can result from having a stroke. This article provides an overview of the major psychological effects of stroke, recommended assessment tools, promising treatment trends, and directions for further research. Improving our ability to detect and treat these difficult emotional challenges can facilitate effective treatment and prevention strategies and increase quality of life for stroke survivors, their loved ones, and their communities.

Hematochezia caused by tandospirone in a patient with major depressive disorder and anxious distress: a case report

Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) with anxious distress is a relatively common condition that is often associated with a poor treatment response. In order to enhance the effectiveness of MDD treatment, 5-HT1A agonists like tandospirone are often prescribed in conjunction with antidepressants. While it is known that antidepressants can increase the risk of bleeding, whether tandospirone poses a similar risk remains uncertain.

Case presentation

We presented the case of a 55-year-old Chinese woman diagnosed with MDD and anxious distress. After receiving various types of antidepressants, she experienced hematochezia following the administration of tandospirone, sertraline, and agomelatine. The occurrence of hematochezia ceased after tandospirone was discontinued. The patient was subsequently discharged with a treatment regime consisting of sertraline and agomelatine. During the 1-month follow-up, she reported no hematochezia.

Conclusion

Tandospirone may potentially increase the risk of hematochezia in patients with MDD and anxious distress.

Incidence of bleeding events in patients on concomitant tyrosine kinase inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we aim to determine the risk of bleeding or thrombosis with concurrent use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used to treat CML, and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with CP-CML cared for at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) between April 2016 to February 2021. Participants were included if diagnosed with CP-CML and began TKI treatment (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, bosutinib, or ponatinib) after April 2016.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were evaluated, eighty of whom were taking TKIs only (median age 55, 40% female), and twenty were taking TKI and SSRI concomitantly (median age 53.5, 55% female). Baseline demographics between these groups were similar across all variables. Patients in the TKI only group had 9 bleeding events and 3 thrombotic events. Patients in the combination group had 6 bleeding events and 1 thrombotic event. There was no difference between overall rates of major bleeding (4% v. 10%, p = 0.26) or thrombotic events (4% v. 5%, p = 1). However, patients in the combination group were more likely to have major intracranial bleeding events (0% v. 10%, p = 0.04), and there was a trend to significance for minor bleeding events (7.5% v. 20%, p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of TKIs and SSRIs does not appear to increase the total risk of bleeding or thrombotic events compared to patients on TKIs only. However, concomitant use of TKIs and SSRIs may increase risk of intracranial bleeding. Further work is needed to fully assess this risk.

[Understanding and assessing the antidepressant drug-associated risk of bleeding]

Antidepressants, in particular selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), are the most commonly prescribed psychopharmacological drug group. Thus, a precise knowledge of the expected adverse drug reactions is indispensable. The increased risk of bleeding events is well documented, especially in patients treated with SSRIs. However, many other antidepressant drug groups have also been implicated in increasing the risk of bleeding. In the following review, the thrombocytic serotonin system and the respective targets of the different antidepressants are explained. Subsequently, the available literature on bleeding under the respective antidepressant classes or individual substances is presented, using data from meta-analyses whenever possible. In addition to the risk of bleeding in general, individual bleeding entities are also considered, such as gastrointestinal and cerebral hemorrhages. Finally, the effects of other drugs that increase the risk of bleeding (i. e., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, platelet aggregation inhibitors and anticoagulants) in combination with antidepressant drugs are discussed. The information presented here is meant to guide practitioner's decision making regarding an appropriate antidepressant pharmacotherapy based on the patient's individual risk constellation.

Using machine learning to develop a clinical prediction model for SSRI-associated bleeding: a feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Adverse drug events (ADEs) are associated with poor outcomes and increased costs but may be prevented with prediction tools. With the National Institute of Health All of Us (AoU) database, we employed machine learning (ML) to predict selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-associated bleeding.

METHODS

The AoU program, beginning in 05/2018, continues to recruit ≥ 18 years old individuals across the United States. Participants completed surveys and consented to contribute electronic health record (EHR) for research. Using the EHR, we determined participants who were exposed to SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, vortioxetine). Features (n = 88) were selected with clinicians' input and comprised sociodemographic, lifestyle, comorbidities, and medication use information. We identified bleeding events with validated EHR algorithms and applied logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, and extreme gradient boost to predict bleeding during SSRI exposure. We assessed model performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve statistic (AUC) and defined clinically significant features as resulting in > 0.01 decline in AUC after removal from the model, in three of four ML models.

RESULTS

There were 10,362 participants exposed to SSRIs, with 9.6% experiencing a bleeding event during SSRI exposure. For each SSRI, performance across all four ML models was relatively consistent. AUCs from the best models ranged 0.632-0.698. Clinically significant features included health literacy for escitalopram, and bleeding history and socioeconomic status for all SSRIs.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated feasibility of predicting ADEs using ML. Incorporating genomic features and drug interactions with deep learning models may improve ADE prediction.

Deep venous thrombosis and hyponatremia associated with citalopram use for behavioral symptoms in Parkinson's disease: a case report

BACKGROUND

Evidence is limited regarding the optimal therapeutic approach for neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used for mood disorders and behavioral symptoms in older adults with cognitive impairment, but they have limited efficacy in patients with PDD. The effect of SSRIs on hemostasis is also unclear. This report describes a patient with PDD who developed deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and hyponatremia after initiating citalopram treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 86-year-old woman with PDD presented to our emergency department with altered mental status, generalized weakness, and left lower leg swelling. Citalopram was begun 4 weeks previously for behavioral changes and was discontinued 2 days before presentation because of excessive fatigue. At presentation, her plasma sodium level was 123 mg/dL. Brain computed tomography showed age-related changes. Doppler ultrasound revealed a DVT in the left lower leg. The patient was treated with hypertonic saline and intravenous heparin. After normalization of her sodium, she was discharged on donepezil and apixaban. At follow-up, her sodium remained normal, and her cognition and behavior were noticeably improved.

CONCLUSION

Older adults with Parkinson's disease are sensitive to adverse effects of psychotropic agents, including SSRIs, which are not recommended first-line agents for behavioral symptoms in PDD. Upon initiating SSRIs in older patients with functional decline and multiple comorbidities, physicians need to evaluate the patient's risk factors for bleeding or thrombosis. Physical activities should also be maintained as much as possible.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) Bleeding Risk: Considerations for the Consult-Liaison Psychiatrist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present a clinically oriented review of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-related bleeding issues commonly addressed by consult-liaison psychiatrists.

RECENT FINDINGS

Concomitant medical, surgical, or hospital-based conditions exacerbate the risk of SSRI-related bleeding even though a review of the literature suggests it is only marginally elevated. Psychiatrists and other clinicians need to consider these conditions along with antidepressant benefits when answering the question: to start, hold, continue, or change the antidepressant? Where an evidence base is limited, mechanistic understanding may help consult-liaison psychiatrists navigate this terrain and collaborate with other medical specialties on responsible antidepressant management. Most often, the risk is cumulative; data are not directly applicable to complex clinical situations. This review incorporates a hematologic perspective and approach to bleeding risk assessment along with extant data on SSRI-induced bleeding risk ad specific medical conditions.

Association between selective serotonin and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor therapy and hematuria

BACKGROUND

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are used as first-line treatment for many psychiatric diseases, especially major depressive disorder. However, an important side effect of these drugs is the risk of bleeding due to platelet dysfunction. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of hematuria in patients using SSRI/SNRIs and to compare with a control group.

METHODS

This study included patients who were followed up and treated with SSRI/SNRI in the psychiatric outpatient clinic of the Antalya Medical Park Hospital between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2021 and a control group comprising patients who presented to the medical check-up outpatient clinic between the same dates. Complete urinalysis was performed for all patients and the results were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Each group included 100 patients with a female/male ratio of 1. The mean age was 41.45 ± 13.47 (16-74) years in the study group and 40.51 ± 13.75 (20-70) years in the control group (p = 0.519). Mean duration of SSRI/SNRI use in the study group was 13.35 ± 1.32 (1-64) months. The prevalence of hematuria was 17% in the SSRI/SNRI group and 6% in the control group (p = 0.015). All cases of hematuria were microscopic hematuria.

CONCLUSION

Hematuria is significantly more common in patients receiving SSRI/SNRI treatment. The use of SSRI/SNRI should also be taken into account when investigating the etiology of hematuria.

Concomitant Use of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Oral Anticoagulants and Risk of Major Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), the most prescribed antidepressants, are associated with a modestly increased risk of major bleeding. However, in patients treated with both SSRIs and oral anticoagulants (OACs), the risk of major bleeding may be substantial.

OBJECTIVE

 To assess the risk of major bleeding associated with concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs, compared with OAC use alone.

METHODS

 We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to December 1, 2021) for clinical trials and observational studies assessing the association between concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs and the risk of major bleeding. Given sufficient homogeneity of studies, we conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of major bleeding associated with concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs, compared with OAC use alone.

RESULTS

 The review comprised 14 studies, including 7 cohort and 7 nested case-control studies. Following assessment of clinical and methodological heterogeneity, eight studies with a total of 98,070 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled HR of major bleeding associated with concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs was 1.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.58). In secondary analyses, the pooled HR for concomitant use of SSRIs and direct OACs was 1.47 (95% CI: 1.03-2.10).

CONCLUSION

 Concomitant use of SSRIs and OACs was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding. Overall, our findings suggest that physicians may need to tailor treatment according to individual patient risk factors for bleeding when prescribing SSRIs to patients using OACs.

Risk for intracranial hemorrhage in individuals after mild traumatic brain injury who are taking serotonergic antidepressants

Background

Serotonergic antidepressants may predispose to bleeding, but little is known of the risk for traumatic intracranial bleeding.

Methods

This was a prospective case-control study of 218 patients with mild traumatic brain injuries (TBI) who were treated at a Finnish tertiary trauma hospital. Injury-related information and clinical findings were prospectively collected in the emergency department. Detailed pre-injury health history was collected from electronic medical records. Information on the use of serotonergic antidepressants was attained from the Finnish national prescription registry. All head CT scans were reviewed by a neuroradiologist based on the Common Data Elements. Cases were patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on head CT. Controls were patients from the same cohort, but without traumatic intracranial lesions on CT. The proportion with traumatic intracranial bleeding for patients on serotonergic antidepressant medication was compared to the proportion for patients not on serotonergic medication.

Results

The study cohort consisted of 24 cases with traumatic intracranial bleeding and 194 injured controls. The median age of the sample was 70 years (interquartile range = 50-83). One fifth (21.6%) of all the patients were taking a serotonergic antidepressant. Of the patients on an antidepressant, 10.6% (5/47) had an acute hemorrhagic lesion compared to 11.1% (19/171) of those who were not on an antidepressant (p = 0.927). In the regression analysis, traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was not associated with antidepressant use.

Conclusion

Serotonergic antidepressant use was not associated with an increased risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage after a mild TBI. The patients in this relatively small cohort were mostly middle-aged and older adults. These factors limit the generalizability of the results in younger patients with mild TBI.

Use of serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants and the risk of bleeding complications in patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) antidepressants are implicated in increasing the risk of bleeding among users; however, the comparative increase in bleeding risk with concurrent antithrombotic therapy (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) remains unclear. As such, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available evidence to evaluate the effects of SRI and the risk of bleeding complications among patients receiving antithrombotic therapy.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and grey literature (Google Scholar and preprint reports) up to 26 November, 2020, with no language restrictions (updated on 31 July 2021). The primary outcome of interest was major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and any bleeding events. We used a random-effects model meta-analysis to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We did not identify any randomised studies but found 32 non-randomized studies (cohort or case-control) with 1,848,285 patients that fulfilled the study selection criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Among individuals receiving anticoagulants (13 studies), SRI users experienced a statistically higher risk of major bleeding compared to non-SRI users: pooled OR was 1.39 (95% CI, 1.23-1.58; p < .001; moderate heterogeneity). Among individuals receiving antiplatelet therapy (2 studies), SRI users were associated with an increased risk of major bleeding: pooled OR was 1.45 (95% CI, 1.17-1.80; p = .001; low heterogeneity). For secondary outcomes, the use of SRI among individuals treated with antithrombotic therapy revealed a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding or any bleeding events, whereas only anticoagulant use was illustrated an increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SRI antidepressants among patients treated with antithrombotic therapy (either anticoagulant or antiplatelet) is associated with a higher risk of bleeding complications, suggesting that caution is warranted in co-prescription.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42018083917KEY MESSAGESIn this meta-analysis of 32 non-randomized studies, SRI users were associated with the risk of bleeding complications compared to non-SRI users, with concurrent antithrombotic use (either anticoagulant or antiplatelet).The risk was consistently elevated across types of bleeding events (major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, or any bleeding events), whereas only anticoagulant use was associated with intracranial haemorrhage.To promote the rational use of medicines, our findings suggest that the risk-benefit ratio must account for the clear efficacy of SRI against safety concerns in terms of bleeding risks.

Use of tramadol and the risk of bleeding complications in patients on oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether tramadol intake increases the risk of bleeding in patients receiving oral anticoagulants.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42022327230. We searched PubMed and Embase up to 14 April 2022, and references and citations of included studies were screened. Comparative and non-comparative studies exploring bleeding complications among adult patients on oral anticoagulants and tramadol were included. Risk of bias was assessed using an adaptation of the Drug Interaction Probability Scale for case reports and case series and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for comparative studies. A meta-analysis was performed for the risk of serious bleeding (leading to hospitalisation or death) associated with tramadol in patients on vitamin K antagonists.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were included: 1 case series, 12 case reports, 2 case-control studies and 2 cohort studies. Most of the studies described tramadol-vitamin K antagonists' concomitant use; one case-control study also assessed dabigatran and rivaroxaban; one case report involved dabigatran. Among case reports/series, a total of 33 patients had a bleeding complication while using tramadol and an oral anticoagulant. The 4 comparative studies reported an increased bleeding risk during tramadol and vitamin K antagonist intake which was statistically significant in one study; the pooled risk ratio of serious bleeding was 2.68 [95% CI: 1.45 to 4.96; p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION

This systematic review confirms an association between tramadol use and risk of bleeding in patients on vitamin K antagonists. Evidence is too limited to assess whether this risk extends to patients on direct oral anticoagulants, and further studies are needed.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: New hope in the fight against COVID-19

The emerging COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic increase in global mortality and morbidity rates. As in most infections, fatal complications of coronavirus affliction are triggered by an untrammeled host inflammatory response. Cytokine storms created by high levels of interleukin and other cytokines elucidate the pathology of severe COVID-19. In this respect, repurposing drugs that are already available and might exhibit anti-inflammatory effects have received significant attention. With the in vitro and clinical investigation of several studies on the effect of antidepressants on COVID-19 prognosis, previous data suggest that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) might be the new hope for the early treatment of severely afflicted patients. SSRIs' low cost and availability make them potentially eligible for COVID-19 repurposing. This review summarizes current achievements and literature about the connection between SSRIs administration and COVID-19 prognosis.

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) in Pregnancy: An Updated Review on Risks to Mother, Fetus, and Child

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an updated summary and appraisal of work from 2019 to 2022 examining risks of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use in pregnancy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Perinatal SSRI exposure does not increase risk of major malformations or gestational diabetes after accounting for underlying maternal illness. SSRIs are associated with small increase in risk of pre-eclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, preterm delivery, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions, though absolute risk of these outcomes is low. While data suggests no increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring, mixed evidence indicates increased risk of adverse cognitive outcomes and affective disorders. Recent evidence suggest low absolute risk of clinically relevant negative outcomes with perinatal SSRI exposure when compared to untreated perinatal depression. However, study design and ability to control for confounding remains an ongoing research challenge, highlighting need for ongoing rigorous study design and analysis.

Gender-differences in antithrombotic therapy across the spectrum of ischemic heart disease: Time to tackle the Yentl syndrome?

The incidence and clinical presentation of ischemic heart disease (IHD), as well as thrombotic and bleeding risks, appear to differ between genders. Compared with men, women feature an increased thrombotic risk, probably related to an increased platelet reactivity, higher level of coagulation factors, and sex-associated unique cardiovascular risk factors, such as pregnancy-related (i.e., pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes), gynecological disorders (i.e., polycystic ovary syndrome, early menopause) and autoimmune or systemic inflammatory diseases. At the same time, women are also at increased risk of bleeding, due to inappropriate dosing of antithrombotic agents, smaller blood vessels, lower body weight and comorbidities, such as diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Pharmacological strategies focused on the personalization of antithrombotic treatment may, therefore, be particularly appealing in women in light of their higher bleeding and ischemic risks. Paradoxically, although women represent a large proportion of cardiovascular patients in our practice, adequate high-quality clinical trial data on women remain scarce and inadequate to guide decision-making processes. As a result, IHD in women tends to be understudied, underdiagnosed and undertreated, a phenomenon known as a "Yentl syndrome." It is, therefore, compelling for the scientific community to embark on dedicated clinical trials to address underrepresentation of women and to acquire evidence-based knowledge in the personalization of antithrombotic therapy in women.

Incidence and Associated Factors of Anemia in Patients with Acute Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Background

Anemia might contribute to the development of secondary injury in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). Potential determinants of anemia are still poorly acknowledged, and reported incidence of declined hemoglobin concentration varies widely between different studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of severe anemia among patients with moderate to severe TBI and to evaluate patient- and trauma-related factors that might be associated with the development of anemia.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study involved all adult patients admitted to Tampere University Hospital’s emergency department for moderate to severe TBI (August 2010 to July 2012). Detailed information on patient demographics and trauma characteristics were obtained, including data on posttraumatic care, data on neurosurgical procedures, and all measured in-hospital hemoglobin values. Severe anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level less than 100 g/L. Both univariate and multivariable analyses were performed, and hemoglobin trajectories were created.

Results

The study included 145 patients with moderate to severe TBI (male 83.4%, mean age 55.0 years). Severe anemia, with a hemoglobin level less than 100 g/L, was detected in 66 patients (45.5%) and developed during the first 48 h after the trauma. In the univariate analysis, anemia was more common among women (odds ratio [OR] 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–7.15), patients with antithrombotic medication prior to trauma (OR 3.33; 95% CI 1.34–8.27), patients with cardiovascular comorbidities (OR 3.12; 95% CI 1.56–6.25), patients with diabetes (OR 4.56; 95% CI 1.69–12.32), patients with extracranial injuries (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.69–12.32), and patients with midline shift on primary head computed tomography (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.03–4.01). In the multivariable analysis, midline shift and extracranial traumas were associated with the development of severe anemia (OR 2.26 [95% CI 1.05–4.48] and OR 4.71 [95% CI 1.74–12.73], respectively).

Conclusions

Severe anemia is common after acute moderate to severe TBI, developing during the first 48 h after the trauma. Possible anemia-associated factors include extracranial traumas and midline shift on initial head computed tomography.

Effect of body weight on bleeding events of aspirin in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack patients

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Bleeding is the most common adverse reaction to aspirin and can lead to drug discontinuation or even be life-threatening in the secondary prevention of stroke or transient ischemic attack. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for bleeding adverse reaction of aspirin in ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients treated with aspirin (100 mg) as a secondary prevention for ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. The bleeding events that occurred during the first year were collected, including gastrointestinal, skin, nasal cavity, gum, and urinary tract bleeding events. Then, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent factors associated with bleeding events of aspirin.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 578 patients were enrolled in this study, and 58 patients developed bleeding during the first year of secondary prevention. Body weight and combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were found to be significant risk factors for overall bleeding (p = 0.025 and 0.012). Body weight below 60 kg was a risk factor for overall bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding events.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Patients weighing less than 60 kg were at increased risk of bleeding with 100 mg aspirin for secondary prevention of cerebral infarction transient ischemic attack.

Potential Role of the Antidepressants Fluoxetine and Fluvoxamine in the Treatment of COVID-19

Mapping non-canonical cellular pathways affected by approved medications can accelerate drug repurposing efforts, which are crucial in situations with a global impact such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Fluoxetine and fluvoxamine are well-established and widely-used antidepressive agents that act as serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI-s). Interestingly, these drugs have been reported earlier to act as lysosomotropic agents, inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase in the lysosomes, and as ligands of sigma-1 receptors, mechanisms that might be used to fight severe outcomes of COVID-19. In certain cases, these drugs were administered for selected COVID-19 patients because of their antidepressive effects, while in other cases, clinical studies were performed to assess the effect of these drugs on treating COVID-19 patients. Clinical studies produced promising data that encourage the further investigation of fluoxetine and fluvoxamine regarding their use in COVID-19. In this review, we summarize experimental data and the results of the performed clinical studies. We also provide an overview of previous knowledge on the tissue distribution of these drugs and by integrating this information with the published experimental results, we highlight the real opportunity of using these drugs in our fight against COVID-19.

Molecular actions of sex hormones in the brain and their potential treatment use in anxiety disorders

Anxiety disorders are one of the most prevalent mood disorders that can lead to impaired quality of life. Current treatment of anxiety disorders has various adverse effects, safety concerns, or restricted efficacy; therefore, novel therapeutic targets need to be studied. Sex steroid hormones (SSHs) play a crucial role in the formation of brain structures, including regions of the limbic system and prefrontal cortex during perinatal development. In the brain, SSHs have activational and organizational effects mediated by either intracellular or transmembrane G-protein coupled receptors. During perinatal developmental periods, the physiological concentrations of SSHs lead to the normal development of the brain; however, the early hormonal dysregulation could result in various anxiety diorders later in life. Sex differences in the prevalence of anxiety disorders suggest that SSHs might be implicated in their development. In this review, we discuss preclinical and clinical studies regarding the role of dysregulated SSHs signaling during early brain development that modifies the risk for anxiety disorders in a sex-specific manner in adulthood. Moreover, our aim is to summarize potential molecular mechanisms by which the SSHs may affect anxiety disorders in preclinical research. Finally, the potential effects of SSHs in the treatment of anxiety disorders are discussed.

Depression in Female Adolescents with Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

OBJECTIVE

To assess the degree to which heavy menstrual bleeding is associated with depression, independent of hormonal contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1168 female adolescents 9-18 years old presenting to general pediatricians for heavy menstrual bleeding or well visits. Depression was the primary outcome and defined as a diagnosis in the health record. Univariable and multivariable regression models were fit to the data to identify factors associated with depression diagnosis.

RESULTS

In total, 581 adolescents with heavy menstrual bleeding and 587 without heavy menstrual bleeding were included. Depression diagnoses occurred with greater frequency in youth with heavy menstrual bleeding compared with those without heavy menstrual bleeding (50.9% vs 24.2% P < .001; risk ratio 1.67, 95% CI 1.39-2.01) but did not significantly differ between those taking vs not taking hormonal contraception (risk ratio 0.99; 95% CI 0.84-1.17). Most patients with depression and heavy menstrual bleeding developed depression following or concurrent with heavy menstrual bleeding (261/296, 88%). Of these, 199 of 261 (76%) were treated with hormonal contraception, but the majority (168/199; 84%) were diagnosed with depression before initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Heavy menstrual bleeding is associated with depression diagnosis in female adolescents. The use of hormonal contraception was not associated with depression diagnosis in multivariable analysis, covarying heavy menstrual bleeding, age, body mass index, anxiety, sexual activity, and substance use. As hormonal contraception is often used to treat heavy menstrual bleeding, heavy menstrual bleeding may be partially driving previous reports of increased depression risk in those taking hormonal contraception.

Escitalopram-induced epistaxis: A case report

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a group of drugs used to treat various psychiatric disorders such as major depression, generalised anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive syndrome. Although generally safe, SSRIs can lead to various adverse effects, including an increased risk of bleeding due to their effect on platelet activation and aggregation. Unexpected bleeding can occur at different sites, in people of different age groups, and in combination with other medications. The commonly reported risk factors associated with medication-induced bleeding in patients with mental disorders include co-administration of other drugs and liver cirrhosis or failure. We report a relatively less common adverse effect of SSRIs. This is the case of a Middle Eastern man, known to have seasonal allergic rhinitis, who developed self-limiting epistaxis following the use of escitalopram for a depressive disorder. Since a history of seasonal allergy can precipitate bleeding when using SSRIs, risk factors for bleeding associated with SSRIs, excluding the common causes, should be explored for better management and prevention.

Risk of Bleeding Associated with Antidepressant Drugs: The Competitive Impact of Antithrombotics in Quantitative Signal Detection

BACKGROUND

To date, disproportionality analysis has been unable to demonstrate the increased bleeding risk associated with antidepressant drugs, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesised that a potential signal for an increased bleeding risk may be mitigated by the effects of agents other than antidepressant drugs that are strongly associated with haemorrhages, especially antithrombotics. In addition, we investigated if the use of more specific search terms of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities facilitates the detection of signals.

METHODS

Pharmacovigilance data from the Uppsala Monitoring Centre were used to calculate substance-specific reporting odds ratios (RORs) for all types of bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding. Reporting odds ratios were calculated with and without antithrombotic comedication.

RESULTS

Regarding any type of bleeding, no signals were found in association with antidepressant drugs. Concerning upper gastrointestinal bleeding, signals were found related to citalopram (ROR: 1.56 [95% confidence interval 1.11-2.20]) and escitalopram (ROR: 1.52 [95% confidence interval 1.03-2.25]). After removal of reports related to antithrombotics, these signals could no longer be detected, but a new signal related to St. John's Wort associated with haemorrhages was found (ROR: 1.50 [95% confidence interval 1.21-1.86]).

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotics seem unlikely to have a major impact on the detection of the bleeding risk of antidepressant drugs. The different categorisation of adverse drug reactions regarding the strength of a causal relationship between a drug and an event in the database may be relevant for this negative finding.

Anesthetic Considerations for Patients on Psychotropic Drug Therapies

Psychotropic drugs are used in the treatment of psychiatric and non-psychiatric conditions. Many patients who are on psychotropic medications may present for procedures requiring anesthesia. Psychotropic medications can have dangerous interactions with drugs commonly used in anesthesia, some of which can be life-threatening. In this review, we describe the current anesthetic considerations for patients on psychotropic drug therapies, including antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, and stimulants. The pharmacology, side effects, and potential drug interactions of the commonly prescribed psychotropic drug therapies with anesthetic agents are described. Further, we highlight the current recommendations regarding the cessation and continuation of these medications during the perioperative period.

Serotonergic Antidepressants and Risk for Traumatic Intracranial Bleeding

Background: Serotonergic antidepressants may predispose to bleeding but the effect on traumatic intracranial bleeding is unknown. Methods: The rate of intracranial bleeding in patients with antidepressant medication was compared to patients not antidepressants in a cohort of patients with acute head injury. This association was examined by using a consecutive cohort of head trauma patients from a Finnish tertiary center emergency department (Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland). All consecutive (2010-2012) adult patients (n = 2,890; median age = 58; male = 56%, CT-positive = 22%, antithrombotic medication users = 25%, antidepressant users = 10%) who underwent head CT due to head trauma in the emergency department were included. Results: Male gender, GCS <15, older age, and anticoagulation were associated with an increased risk for traumatic intracranial bleeding. There were 17.8% of patients not taking antidepressants and 18.3% of patients on an antidepressant who had traumatic intracranial bleeding (p = 0.830). Among patients who were taking antithrombotic medication, 16.6% of the patients not taking antidepressant medication, and 22.5% of the patients taking antidepressant medication, had bleeding (p = 0.239). In a regression analysis, traumatic intracranial hemorrhage was not associated with antidepressant use. Conclusions: Serotonergic antidepressant use was not associated with an increased risk of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.

Safety, Tolerability, and Real-World Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine in Older Adults With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of repeated doses of intravenous (IV) ketamine in older adults (i.e., ≥60 years of age) with treatment-resistant depression.

METHOD

In this case series, fifty-three older adults (M_age = 67, SD = 6; 57% female [n = 30]) received 4 IV ketamine infusions, administered over 1-2 weeks. Effectiveness of IV ketamine was measured using the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report 16 (QIDS-SR16) approximately 2 days after infusions 1-3, and 1-2 weeks after infusion 4. Safety was measured as hemodynamic changes before, during, immediately after, and 20 minutes after each infusion. Tolerability was assessed via systematic reporting of treatment-emergent adverse events during and after each infusion, in addition to symptoms of dissociation measured using the Clinician Administered Dissociative States Scale. Partial response (25%-50% symptomatic improvement from baseline), response (≥50% symptomatic improvement from baseline), clinically significant improvements (≥25% symptomatic improvement from baseline), and remission rates (QIDS-SR16 ≤5) were also calculated.

RESULTS

Participants reported significant decreases in depressive symptoms (i.e., as measured by the QIDS-SR16) with repeated ketamine infusions (F(4, 92) = 7.412, p <0.001). The mean QIDS-SR16 score was 17.12 (SD = 5.33) at baseline and decreased to 12.52 (SD = 5.79) following 4 infusions. After 4 infusions, 31% (n = 8) of participants partially responded to IV ketamine, 27% (n = 7) responded, 58% (n = 15) experienced clinically significant improvements, and 10% (n = 3) met remission criteria. Thirty-six participants (69%) experienced treatment-emergent hypertension during at least 1 infusion, and 10 (19%) required intervention with an antihypertensive. Drowsiness was the most commonly reported adverse event (50% of infusions; n = 73).

CONCLUSION

Ketamine was associated with transient treatment-emergent hypertension. Response and remission rates were comparable to those reported in general adult samples. Findings are limited by the open-label, chart review nature of this study.

Serotonergic antidepressants and hospitalization for bleeding in patients supported with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND

Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF -LVAD) improve survival in patients with advanced heart failure, but confer risk of bleeding complications. Serotonergic antidepressants (SA) are commonly used in heart failure patients receiving LVADs, but their inhibitory effect on platelet function may contribute to bleeding risk.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of LVAD patients at our institution from 2016 -2019 comparing patients treated with SA after LVAD to those without SA. Demographic and clinical variables related to bleeding were collected on discharge from index hospitalization for CF-LVAD implantation and on admission for any bleeding event. The primary endpoint was incidence of bleeding requiring hospitalization after discharge. Secondary endpoints included overall number of admissions for bleeding, time to first hospitalization for a bleeding event, and incidence rate of hospitalizations for bleeding per patient year.

RESULTS

100 patients met inclusion criteria for the study. A total of 5 patients without a history of SA use and 31 patients who were prescribed SA after CF -LVAD implant were readmitted for a bleeding event after initial implant hospitalization (15% vs 46%, p = 0.004). Bleeding rate per person year (0.3 vs 0.61, p = 0.01) were significantly less in patients without SA use. Age-adjusted multivariable analysis found SA use to be associated with a hospitalization for bleeding (HR 2.3, 95% CI 0.99 -5.4). The higher incidence of hospitalization for bleeding was driven by non-gastrointestinal anatomical sites (6% vs 28%, p = 0.02) with a HR 7.7 (95% CI 0.96 -62).

CONCLUSIONS

SA treatment after CF-LVAD implantation was associated with an increased risk for bleeding complications requiring hospitalization, particularly non-gastrointestinal bleeding.

Drug exposure misclassification in pharmacoepidemiology: Sources and relative impact

BACKGROUND

Drug exposure assessment based on dispensing data can be misclassified when patients do not adhere to their therapy or when information about over-the-counter drugs is not captured in the study database. Previous research has considered hypothetical sensitivity and specificity values, whereas this study aims to assess the impact of literature-based real values of exposure misclassification.

METHODS

A synthetic cohort study was constructed based on the proportion of exposure theoretically captured in a database (range 0.5-1.0) and the level of adherence (0.5-1.0). Three scenarios were explored: nondifferential misclassification, differential misclassification (misclassifications dependent on an unmeasured risk factor doubling the outcome risk), and nondifferential misclassification in a comparative effectiveness study (RR_A and RR_B both 2.0 compared to nonuse, RR_A-B 1.0).

RESULTS

For the scenarios with nondifferential misclassification, 25% nonadherence or 25% uncaptured exposure changed the RR from 2.0 to 1.75, and 1.95, respectively. Applying different proportions of nonadherence or uncaptured use (20% vs. 40%) for subgroups with and without the risk factor, an RR of 0.95 was observed in the absence of a true effect (i.e., true RR = 1). In the comparative effectiveness study, no effect on RR was seen for different proportions of uncaptured exposure; however, different levels of nonadherence for the drugs (20% vs. 40%) led to an underestimation of RR_A-B (0.89).

DISCUSSION

All scenarios led to biased estimates, but the magnitude of the bias differed across scenarios. When testing the robustness of findings of pharmacoepidemiologic studies, we recommend using realistic values of nonadherence and uncaptured exposure based on real-world data.

Dental implications of some commonly prescribed medicines

Several medicines can have an impact on oral health or have implications for dental treatment. It is important that general dental practitioners review the medicines that their patients are taking and consider their potential impact. In this article we highlight some of the medicines or groups of medicines that can affect dental treatment and oral health.