Three single leg standing tests for clinical assessment of chronic plantar heel pain syndrome: static stance, half-squat and heel rise

Barefoot walking is beneficial for individuals with persistent plantar heel pain: A single-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A lack of data exist about the effectiveness of active treatments for persistent plantar heel pain (PPHP).

OBJECTIVES

To compare short-term functional and clinical effects of a 4-week barefoot or shod treadmill walking program for people with PPHP.

METHODS

A single-blinded clinical trial randomized 52 participants with PPHP into either a barefoot walking group (BWG), or a shod walking group (SWG). All participants received therapeutic ultrasound. Outcomes were measured at baseline (t0), following 4 weeks of treatment (t1), and at 1-month follow-up (t2). The SF-36 functional questionnaire score was the main outcome. Secondary outcomes were self-reported and clinically-assessed pain provocation levels, pressure pain thresholds and pain tolerance. Treadmill walking time and speed were measured at t0 and t1; people also recorded the time spent walking each day in a diary.

RESULTS

The BWG exhibited significant improvements in all SF-36 items (except "emotional well-being") (P < 0.05), whereas the SWG exhibited improvements only in "pain" and "health change" items (P = 0.0001; effect size 0.13-0.94). Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG for "physical function" (P = 0.019) and "role limitations due to physical health" items (P = 0.035). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain, with greater improvements in the BWG (P = 0.0001; effect size 0.89). Only the BWG showed significant improvements in pain pressure thresholds (P < 0.05; effect size 0.70) and pain tolerance (P < 0.001; effect size 0.67). Both groups significantly increased their speed and time spent walking on the treadmill (BWG Δ=19.7 min and Δ=1.7 km/h; SWG Δ=16.7 min and Δ=1.1 km/h) and time outdoors (SWG ∆=38.2 min/week; BWG mean ∆=48.5 min/week) (P < 0.001). All clinical tests of pain were significantly less positive in the BWG at all time points (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both walking programs benefited people with PPHP by alleviating pain and improving function and quality of life. Greater improvements were observed in the BWG than the SWG overall.

Myofascial stiffness of plantar fascia and Achilles tendon in individuals with plantar fasciopathy: An observational cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Assessment of myofascial tissue stiffness have a role in identifying physical impairments in plantar fasciopathy (PF). It is still unclear which specific functional and tissue differences exist between individuals with PF.

AIM

To compare myofascial stiffness of plantar fascia, Achilles tendon, and triceps surae between symptomatic and asymptomatic limbs in individuals with PF and between individuals with and without PF.

METHODS

Thirty nine individuals diagnosed with PF and individuals with no history of PF were recruited. Myofascial stiffness of the plantar fascia, Achilles tendon, and triceps surae, range of motion, and clinical tests were performed. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Individuals with PF showed lower mean stiffness in Achilles tendon insertion (MD = -1.00 N/mm; 95%CI: -1.80,-0.21) on the symptomatic limb compared to the corresponding symptomatic limb in control group, a lower mean stiffness in plantar fascia (MD = -0.16 N/mm; 95%CI: -0.30, -0.01) on the symptomatic limb compared to asymptomatic limb, and a lower mean stiffness in the region 3 cm above the Achilles tendon insertion (MD = -0.79; 95%CI: -1.59, -0.00) compared to control. Individuals with PF showed fewer repetitions in heel rise test (MD = -3.97 reps; 95%CI: -5.83, -2.12) and in the step-down test (MD = -5.23 reps; 95%CI: -7.02, -3.44) compared to control.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with PF present reduced stiffness in Achilles tendon insertion and plantar fascia. The reduced stiffness was more evident in Achilles tendon in individuals with PF compared to individuals without PF. Individuals with PF showed lower performance in clinical tests.

The effect of isometric exercise on pain in individuals with plantar fasciopathy: A randomized crossover trial

Isometric exercise is commonly recommended for immediate pain relief in individuals suffering from lower limb tendinopathies, despite the limited evidence supporting its analgesic effect. Due to the similarities between plantar fasciopathy and tendinopathies, the aim of this trial was to investigate the acute effect of isometric exercise on pain, compared to isotonic exercise, or walking, in individuals with plantar fasciopathy. We recruited 20 individuals with plantar fasciopathy for this prospectively-registered, participant-blinded, randomized, superiority crossover trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03264729). Participants attended three exercise sessions (isometric, isotonic, or walking) in a randomized order, within a 2-week period. Both isometric and isotonic exercises were performed standing with the forefoot on a step bench, while walking was performed barefoot. The primary outcome was pain (measured on a 0-100-mm VAS) during a pain-aggravating activity. Secondary outcomes included pressure pain threshold (PPT) under the heel, and plantar fascia thickness (PFT). All outcomes were measured before and after each exercise session. There were no significant differences between the three exercises on pain (P = 0.753), PPTs (P = 0.837), or PFT (P = 0.718). Further, there was no change in pain from before to after any of the exercises (isometric exercise 2.7 mm [95% CI: -12.2; 6.8], isotonic exercise -3.4 mm [95% CI: -5.0; 11.8], or walking 1.6 mm [95% CI: -16.1; 12.9]). Contrary to expectations, isometric exercise was no better than isotonic exercise or walking at reducing pain in individuals with plantar fasciopathy. None of the exercises induced any systematic analgesic effect.