2
|
Odenwald B, Brockow I, Hanauer M, Lüders A, Nennstiel U. Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures. Int J Neonatal Screen 2023; 9:35. [PMID: 37489488 PMCID: PMC10366861 DOI: 10.3390/ijns9030035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Newborn screening using dried blood spots (NBS) is widely acknowledged as a highly successful procedure in secondary prevention. For a number of congenital disorders, severe disability or death are impressively prevented by early detection and early treatment through NBS. However, as with any other screening, NBS can also cause harm, and the principle that "the overall benefits of screening should outweigh the harms" must be considered when introducing and implementing NBS programmes. This publication compiles the results of a systematic literature research on requirements for NBS infrastructure and procedures which was conducted as part of a research project on the quality and shortcomings of the NBS pathway in Germany. The compilation contains the requirements and recommendations for realising the principle of "maximise benefits and minimise harms" in relevant NBS pathway components such as parental education and information, coverage, timeliness, laboratory quality assurance, follow-up of abnormal results, confirmatory diagnostics, documentation, and evaluation. The results reflect the complexity of NBS infrastructure, and thus, they illustrate the importance of considering and implementing NBS as a well-coordinated public health programme with continuous quality management. Special attention should be paid to the perspectives of parents and families. Some NBS issues can substantially benefit from digital instruments or international cooperation. The literature review presented here has contributed to a concept of proposals for the advancement of NBS in Germany, and despite different settings, it may as well be of interest for other countries to achieve the best possible course and outcome of NBS for each child.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Odenwald
- Newborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Uta Nennstiel
- Newborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ulph F, Bennett R. Psychological and Ethical Challenges of Introducing Whole Genome Sequencing into Routine Newborn Screening: Lessons Learned from Existing Newborn Screening. New Bioeth 2023; 29:52-74. [PMID: 36181705 DOI: 10.1080/20502877.2022.2124582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
As a psychologist and an ethicist, we have explored empirically newborn screening consent and communication processes. In this paper we consider the impact on families if newborn screening uses whole genome sequencing. We frame this within the World Health Organization's definition of health and contend that proposals to use whole genome sequencing in newborn screening take into account the ethical, practical and psychological impact of such screening. We argue that the important psychological processes occurring in the neonatal phase necessitate a clear justification that providing risk information at this stage provides a health benefit. We illustrate how research on current newborn screening can inform whole genome sequencing debates, whilst highlighting important gaps. Obtaining explicit, voluntary, and sufficiently informed consent for newborn screening is challenging, however we stress that such consent is ethically and legally appropriate and psychologically and practically important. We conclude by outling how this might be done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Ulph
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Bennett
- Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Department of Law, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bick D, Ahmed A, Deen D, Ferlini A, Garnier N, Kasperaviciute D, Leblond M, Pichini A, Rendon A, Satija A, Tuff-Lacey A, Scott RH. Newborn Screening by Genomic Sequencing: Opportunities and Challenges. Int J Neonatal Screen 2022; 8:40. [PMID: 35892470 PMCID: PMC9326745 DOI: 10.3390/ijns8030040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Newborn screening for treatable disorders is one of the great public health success stories of the twentieth century worldwide. This commentary examines the potential use of a new technology, next generation sequencing, in newborn screening through the lens of the Wilson and Jungner criteria. Each of the ten criteria are examined to show how they might be applied by programmes using genomic sequencing as a screening tool. While there are obvious advantages to a method that can examine all disease-causing genes in a single assay at an ever-diminishing cost, implementation of genomic sequencing at scale presents numerous challenges, some which are intrinsic to screening for rare disease and some specifically linked to genomics-led screening. In addition to questions specific to routine screening considerations, the ethical, communication, data management, legal, and social implications of genomic screening programmes require consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bick
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Arzoo Ahmed
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Dasha Deen
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Alessandra Ferlini
- Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | | | - Dalia Kasperaviciute
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Mathilde Leblond
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Amanda Pichini
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Augusto Rendon
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Aditi Satija
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Alice Tuff-Lacey
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| | - Richard H. Scott
- Genomics England Ltd., Dawson Hall, Charterhouse Square, Barbican, London EC1M 6BQ, UK; (A.A.); (D.D.); (D.K.); (M.L.); (A.P.); (A.R.); (A.S.); (A.T.-L.); (R.H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening: systematic review & meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Eur J Hum Genet 2022; 30:520-531. [PMID: 35256770 PMCID: PMC9090782 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01054-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic screening can be hugely beneficial, yet its expansion poses clinical and ethical challenges due to results of uncertain clinical relevance (such as ‘cystic fibrosis screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis’/CFSPID). This review systematically identifies, appraises, and synthesises the qualitative research on experiences of receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening. Eight databases were systematically searched for original qualitative research using the SPIDER framework, and checked against inclusion criteria by the research team and an independent researcher. Nine papers were included (from USA, Canada, UK, New Zealand). PRISMA, ENTREQ, and EMERGE guidance were used to report. Quality was appraised using criteria for qualitative research. All papers focused on parental responses to uncertain results from newborn screening. Data were synthesised using meta-ethnography and first- and second-order constructs. Findings suggest that results of uncertain clinical relevance are often experienced in the same way as a ‘full-blown’ diagnosis. This has significant emotional and behavioural impact, for example adoption of lifestyle-altering disease-focused behaviours. Analysis suggests this may be due to the results not fitting a common medical model, leading recipients to interpret the significance of the result maladaptively. Findings suggest scope for professionals to negotiate and reframe uncertain screening results. Clearer initial communication is needed to reassure recipients there is no immediate severe health risk from these types of results. Public understanding of an appropriate medical model, that accounts for uncertain genetic screening results in a non-threatening way, may be key to maximising the benefits of genomic medicine and minimising potential psychological harm.
Collapse
|
6
|
IJzebrink A, van Dijk T, Franková V, Loeber G, Kožich V, Henneman L, Jansen M. Informing Parents about Newborn Screening: A European Comparison Study. Int J Neonatal Screen 2021; 7:ijns7010013. [PMID: 33652810 PMCID: PMC7930998 DOI: 10.3390/ijns7010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowledge about newborn screening (NBS) is an important factor for parents to make an informed decision about participation. In Europe, countries inform parents differently about their NBS program, potentially including different knowledge aspects in their information. The aim of this study was to assess twenty-six European parental information products and to analyze their knowledge aspects through a content analysis. The analyzed aspects were compared to a list of eight knowledge aspects from scientific literature. The list includes aspects important for parents' decision-making, such as the purpose of screening. The study showed that most of the eight knowledge aspects are included in NBS information products of the majority of countries. However, there were differences between countries, for example in the amount of detail and phrasing of the information. Additional relevant knowledge aspects have also been identified and are recommended to optimize information products, such as the handling of residual bloodspot samples. This study only assessed knowledge aspects in information products meant for printing, but many countries also use other communication methods, and the impact on knowledge of the delivery of the information needs further study. Preferences of parents on alternative communication methods need to be considered and evaluated on their effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber IJzebrink
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.IJ.); (T.v.D.); (L.H.)
| | - Tessa van Dijk
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.IJ.); (T.v.D.); (L.H.)
| | - Věra Franková
- Department of Pediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Praque, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic; (V.F.); (V.K.)
- Institute for Medical Humanities, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praque, 128 08 Praque 2, Czech Republic
| | - Gerard Loeber
- International Society for Neonatal Screening, 3721CK Bilthoven, The Netherlands;
| | - Viktor Kožich
- Department of Pediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Praque, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic; (V.F.); (V.K.)
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.IJ.); (T.v.D.); (L.H.)
| | - Marleen Jansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (A.IJ.); (T.v.D.); (L.H.)
- Centre for Health Protection, National Institue for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-20-444-3869
| |
Collapse
|