[Trends in the use of midurethral slings after the new legislation: A nationwide survey]

Risk factors for stress urinary incontinence recurrence after midurethral sling revision

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to report the rate of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) recurrence after sling revision, and to determine predictive factors of SUI recurrence.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a single academic center between 2005 and 2022, of patients who underwent sling revision. Four surgical techniques were used for sling revision (loosening, section, partial, and total excision). The primary endpoint was recurrence of SUI at 3 months postoperatively, and the other outcome of interest was the rate of subsequent anti-incontinence surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were included for analysis. SUI recurred in 46.4% of patients. Fifteen patients underwent a subsequent anti-incontinence procedure (21.8%). The time to revision was significantly longer in the group with recurrent SUI (median: 84.5 vs. 44.8 months; p = 0.004). The recurrence rate differed significantly depending on the revision technique: 7.7% after sling loosening, 22.2% after sling section, 60% after partial excision, and 66.7% after complete sling removal (p = 0.001). The risk of SUI recurrence was lower for those whose indication of reoperation was voiding dysfunction (27.3% vs. 66.7%; p = 0.002), and was higher for those who underwent a trans-obturator tap rather than a tension-free vaginal tape revision (68.4% vs. 35.7%; p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, only the revision technique remained significantly associated with the risk of recurrence of SUI (complete excision vs. section: odds ratio = 4.66; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The risk of SUI recurrence may differ widely according to the techniques used, and it seems that the less extensive the surgical procedure is, the lower the risk is.

Comparison of early loosening vs delayed section of mid-urethral slings for postoperative voiding dysfunction

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) is a common occurrence after midurethral sling (MUS) insertion and can result in acute or chronic urinary retention or de novo lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, the management of BOO after MUS is not standardised. The objective of this study was to compare two therapeutic strategies for suspected BOO after MUS.

METHODS

Patients who had surgical revision for voiding dysfunction with a post-void residual (PVR) ≥100 ml after MUS in five centres between 2005 and 2020 were included in a retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups: early sling loosening (EL) vs delayed section/excision of the sling (DS).

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included: 38 in the EL group and 32 in the DS group. The postoperative complication rate was comparable in both groups (10.5% vs 12.5%; p = 0.99). At 3 months, the rate of withdrawal from self-catheterisation was similar in the two groups (92.1% vs 100%; p = 0.25) as was the PVR (57.5 vs 63.5 ml; p = 0.09). After a median follow-up of 9 months, there were significantly more patients with resolved voiding dysfunction in the EL group (63.2% vs 31.3%; p = 0.01). The rate of persistent/recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was higher in the DS group (21% vs 43.7%; p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, the main predictive factor of recurrent SUI was DS (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.01-8.60, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Early loosening of MUS in the case of postoperative voiding dysfunction offers better efficacy than DS of the sling, with a lower risk of recurrent/persistent SUI.