A reappraisal of the role of vesicourethral anastomosis biopsy in patient candidates for salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy

Postoperative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Acquired Certainties and Still Open Issues. A Review of Recent Literature

It is recognized that radiation therapy can eradicate microscopic tumor disease, even in postoperative prostate cancer patients, when extracapsular extension, positive surgical margins or increased prostate-specific antigen is found in surgical specimens. This review of recent literature analyzes and discusses acquired certainties and still open questions regarding type, timing, doses, techniques, toxicities, and associated hormonal therapies of radiotherapy prescribed after radical prostatectomy. Free full text available at www.tumorionline.it

[Analysis and prognostic factors of the specimen of radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer]

OBJECTIVES

Handling and pathologic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens are crucial to confirm the diagnosis of prostate cancer and evaluate prognostic criteria.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of the scientific literature was performed in the Medline database (PubMed), using different associations of the following keywords: prostate cancer; prostatectomy; specimen; handling; pathology; tumor staging; Gleason score; surgical margin; prognosis; frozen section; lymph node; biomarkers. A particular search was done on specimen management and characterization of tissue prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Handling of both radical prostatectomy specimen and lymph node dissection is standardized according to international criteria. Although the main histoprognostic factors are still Gleason score, pathologic staging and margin status, these criteria have been refined these last 10 years, allowing to improve the prediction of relapse after surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

The standardization of handling and pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens will be mandatory for treatment uniformization according to risk stratification in prostate cancer and personalization of therapeutic approaches.

Role of imaging and biopsy to assess local recurrence after definitive treatment for prostate carcinoma (surgery, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, HIFU)

PURPOSE

Defining the site of recurrent disease early after definitive treatment for a localized prostate cancer is a critical issue as it may greatly influence the subsequent therapeutic strategy or patient management.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching Medline from January 1995 up to January 2011. Electronic searches were limited to the English language, and the keywords prostate cancer, radiotherapy [RT], high intensity focused ultrasound [HIFU], cryotherapy [CRIO], transrectal ultrasound [TRUS], magnetic resonance [MRI], PET/TC, and prostate biopsy were used.

RESULTS

Despite the fact that diagnosis of a local recurrence is based on PSA values and kinetics, imaging by means of different techniques may be a prerequisite for effective disease management. Unfortunately, prostate cancer local recurrences are very difficult to detect by TRUS and conventional imaging that have shown limited accuracy at least at early stages. On the contrary, functional and molecular imaging such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), offers the possibility of imaging molecular or cellular processes of individual tumors. Recently, PET/CT, using 11C-choline, 18F-fluorocholine or 11C-acetate has been successfully proposed in detecting local recurrences as well as distant metastases. Nevertheless, in controversial cases, it is necessary to perform a biopsy of the prostatic fossa or a biopsy of the prostate to assess the presence of a local recurrence under guidance of MRI or TRUS findings.

CONCLUSION

It is likely that imaging will be extensively used in the future to detect and localize prostate cancer local recurrences before salvage treatment.

[11C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to restage prostate cancer cases with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and no disease evidence on conventional imaging

PURPOSE

We assessed the value of [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in patients with prostate cancer in whom biochemical failure developed after radical prostatectomy but who showed no disease evidence on conventional imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Considered for this study were 2,124 patients treated with radical prostatectomy who underwent [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to restage disease between December 2004 and January 2007. Study inclusion criteria were 1) previous radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, 2) increasing prostate specific antigen beyond 0.2 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy, 3) no lymph node disease at radical prostatectomy, 4) no evidence of metastatic disease on conventional imaging, 5) no androgen deprivation therapy and 6) no adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy. These criteria were satisfied in 109 of the 2,124 patients (5%).

RESULTS

Median prostate specific antigen at imaging was 0.81 ng/ml (range 0.22 to 16.76 ml). Imaging suggested local recurrence in 4 patients (4%) and pelvic lymph node disease in 8 (7%). Scans were positive in 5%, 15% and 28% of patients with prostate specific antigen less than 1, between 1 and 2, and greater than 2 ng/ml, respectively (p <0.05). Prostate specific antigen was the only significant predictor of tomography results (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography detected increased [11C]choline uptake, suggesting recurrent disease in 11% of patients with prostate cancer, increasing prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy and no evidence of disease on conventional imaging. This modality may be useful to restage disease but it cannot be used to guide therapy.

Role of the Vesico-Urethral Anastomosis Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Local Recurrence following Radical Prostatectomy. Our Experience

In the long-term there is biochemical evidence of recurrent prostate carcinoma in approximately 40% of patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Detecting the site of recurrence (local vs distant) is critical for defining the optimum treatment. Pathological and clinical variables (Gleason score, involvement of seminal vesicles or lymph nodes, margin status at surgery, and especially the timing and pattern of PSA recurrence) may help to predict the site of relapse. Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) of the prostatic fossa in association with TRUS-guided needle biopsy is considered more sensitive than a digital rectal examination for detecting local recurrence, especially if PSA levels are low. Although it cannot detect minimal tumor mass at very low PSA levels (<1 ng/mL), TRUS biopsy is presently the most sensitive method for detecting local recurrence. Nevertheless, the conclusive role of biopsy of the vesico-urethral anastomosis remains unclear. However, [11C]-choline tomography (which is better than conventional imaging for detecting metastatic tumor) has low detection rates for local disease and is considered complementary to TRUS in this setting. Patients with a high PSA after RP may be managed with external beam salvage radiotherapy. An initial PSA of <1 ng/mL, Gleason score < 8 and radiation dose of 66–70 Gy seem to be key factors in determining success. Although a positive TRUS anastomotic biopsy may predict a better outcome after radiation therapy, the need of taking a biopsy in the event of PSA failure remains under investigation. The value of salvage radiation to the prostatic bed for PSA-only progression after RP remains in question.

[pT3R1 prostate cancer : Immediate or delayed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy?]

Approximately 50-60% of patients with tumor stage pT3R1 after radical prostatectomy (RP) who do not receive adjuvant therapy develop biochemical progression. At present it is unclear whether these patients should undergo immediate adjuvant irradiation or whether a wait and see approach should be adopted while monitoring PSA until the PSA level rises from zero and then initiate salvage radiotherapy (SRT).Three randomized trials showed that an absolute improvement of 20% in the 5-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) could be achieved by administering adjuvant radiotherapy with 60 Gy in patients with tumor stage pT3R1, even with a PSA level around zero after RP. The rate of serious late effects is low. On the other hand, there are numerous, albeit retrospective studies, which provide evidence that SRT after an increase in PSA above zero is an effective treatment, but with higher total doses of 66-70 Gy and a higher rate of late effects. Prognostic factors such as the PSA level before radiotherapy is started, PSA doubling time, R1 resection, PSA velocity, and the Gleason score have a significant impact on both the return of the PSA level to zero and the bNED. Depending on the risk factor, between 20 and 70% of patients again achieve PSA levels around zero after SRT. Retrospective comparative studies suggest a benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy; prospective randomized trials do not exist.Adjuvant radiotherapy after RP in stage pT3R1 tumor and SRT in cases of PSA rising above zero or persistent PSA levels are valid options for the management of high-risk patients after RP. SRT requires higher total doses and thus carries a higher risk of late complications. A benefit has been demonstrated for bNED, but not for survival. The approach should be discussed with the individual patient.

Health-related quality of life after adjuvant and salvage postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer - a prospective analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to analyze health-related quality of life changes after postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A group of 101 patients has been surveyed prospectively before (time A), at the last day (B), two months after (C) and >1 year after (D) RT using a validated questionnaire (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) with urinary, bowel, sexual and hormonal domains. The prostatic fossa was treated with a four-field box technique up to a total dose of 66.6 Gy.

RESULTS

While median urinary scores reached baseline levels already two months after radiotherapy (function/bother scores at time A-B-C-D: 94/89-89/75-94/89-94/89; A vs. B: p<0.01), bowel problems needed a longer time to recover (function/bother scores at time A-B-C-D: 96/100-85/89-88/93-96/100; A vs. B/C: p<0.01). Greater bladder volumes inside specific isodoses were associated with temporary significantly lower urinary bother scores and chronically lower urinary incontinence scores. Only 7% of patients reported of erections firm enough for intercourse before RT, so that RT-associated sexual toxicity played a minor role.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to bowel symptoms, acute urinary problems recover very soon after the end of postoperative RT. After >1 year, only minor HRQOL changes occurred in comparison to baseline scores.

Guidelines for target volume definition in post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer, on behalf of the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group

The appropriate application of 3-D conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy or image guided radiotherapy for patients undergoing post-operative radiotherapy for prostate cancer requires a standardisation of the target volume definition and delineation as well as standardisation of the clinical quality assurance procedures. Recommendations for this are presented on behalf of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Radiation Oncology Group and in addition to the already published guidelines for radiotherapy as the primary treatment.

Evidence-based radiation oncology: Definitive, adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer

The standard treatment options based on the risk category (stage, Gleason score, PSA) for localized prostate cancer include surgery, radiotherapy and watchful waiting. The literature does not provide clear-cut evidence for the superiority of surgery over radiotherapy, whereas both approaches differ in their side effects. The definitive external beam irradiation is frequently employed in stage T1b-T1c, T2 and T3 tumors. There is a pretty strong evidence that intermediate- and high-risk patients benefit from dose escalation. The latter requires reduction of the irradiated normal tissue (using 3-dimensional conformal approach, intensity modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiotherapy, etc.). Recent data suggest that prostate cancer may benefit from hypofractionation due to relatively low alpha/beta ratio; these findings warrant confirmation though. The role of whole pelvis irradiation is still controversial. Numerous randomized trials demonstrated a clinical benefit in terms of biochemical control, local and distant control, and overall survival from the addition of androgen suppression to external beam radiotherapy in intermediate- and high-risk patients. These studies typically included locally advanced (T3-T4) and poor-prognosis (Gleason score >7 and/or PSA >20 ng/mL) tumors and employed neoadjuvant/concomitant/adjuvant androgen suppression rather than only adjuvant setting. The ongoing trials will hopefully further define the role of endocrine treatment in more favorable risk patients and in the setting of the dose escalated radiotherapy. Brachytherapy (BRT) with permanent implants may be offered to low-risk patients (cT1-T2a, Gleason score <7, or 3+4, PSA <or=10 ng/mL), with prostate volume of <or=50 ml, no previous transurethral prostate resection and a good urinary function. Some recent data suggest a benefit from combining external beam irradiation and BRT for intermediate-risk patients. EBRT after radical prostatectomy improves disease-free survival and biochemical and local control rates in patients with positive surgical margins or pT3 tumors. Salvage radiotherapy may be considered at the time of biochemical failure in previously non-irradiated patients.