1
|
Chhabra AM, Snider JW, Kole AJ, Stock M, Holtzman AL, Press R, Wang CJ, Li H, Lin H, Shi C, McDonald M, Soike M, Zhou J, Sabouri P, Mossahebi S, Colaco R, Albertini F, Simone CB. Proton Therapy for Spinal Tumors: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00507-8. [PMID: 39181272 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an important role in the management of primary spine tumors. The purpose of this consensus statement was to summarize safe and optimal delivery of PBT for spinal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee consisting of radiation oncologists and medical physicists with specific expertise in spinal irradiation developed expert recommendations discussing treatment planning considerations and current approaches in the treatment of primary spinal tumors. RESULTS Computed tomography simulation: factors that require significant consideration include (1) patient comfort, (2) setup reproducibility and stability, and (3) accessibility of appropriate beam angles. SPINE STABILIZATION HARDWARE If present, hardware should be placed with cross-links well above/below the level of the primary tumor to reduce the metal burden at the level of the tumor bed. New materials that can reduce uncertainties include polyether-ether-ketone and composite polyether-ether-ketone-carbon fiber implants. FIELD ARRANGEMENT Appropriate beam selection is required to ensure robust target coverage and organ at risk sparing. Commonly, 2 to 4 treatment fields, typically from posterior and/or posterior-oblique directions, are used. TREATMENT PLANNING METHODOLOGY Robust optimization is recommended for all pencil beam scanning plans (the preferred treatment modality) and should consider setup uncertainty (between 3 and 7 mm) and range uncertainty (3%-3.5%). In the presence of metal hardware, use of an increased range uncertainty up to 5% is recommended. CONCLUSIONS The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee has developed recommendations to enable centers to deliver PBT safely and effectively for the management of primary spinal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpit M Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York.
| | - James W Snider
- Department of Radiation Oncology, South Florida Proton Therapy Institute, Delray Beach, Florida
| | - Adam J Kole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Markus Stock
- Department of Medical Physics, EBG MedAustron, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Robert Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - C Jake Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Chengyu Shi
- Department of Medical Physics, City of Hope, Irvine, California
| | - Mark McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael Soike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Pouya Sabouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Department of Medical Physics, Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rovel Colaco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Francesca Albertini
- Department of Medical Physics, Paul Scherrer Institut, Würenlingen, Switzerland
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Arfuso M, Kuril S, Shah H, Hanson D. Pediatric Neuroglial Tumors: A Review of Ependymoma and Dysembryoplastic Neuroepithelial Tumor. Pediatr Neurol 2024; 156:139-146. [PMID: 38781722 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Arfuso
- Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | | | - Harshal Shah
- Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey
| | - Derek Hanson
- Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey; Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ajithkumar T, Avanzo M, Yorke E, Tsang DS, Milano MT, Olch AJ, Merchant TE, Dieckmann K, Mahajan A, Fuji H, Paulino AC, Timmermann B, Marks LB, Bentzen SM, Jackson A, Constine LS. Brain and Brain Stem Necrosis After Reirradiation for Recurrent Childhood Primary Central Nervous System Tumors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:655-668. [PMID: 38300187 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reirradiation is increasingly used in children and adolescents/young adults (AYA) with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) reirradiation task force aimed to quantify risks of brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for peer-reviewed articles from 1975 to 2021 identified 92 studies on reirradiation for recurrent tumors in children/AYA. Seventeen studies representing 449 patients who reported brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation contained sufficient data for analysis. While all 17 studies described techniques and doses used for reirradiation, they lacked essential details on clinically significant dose-volume metrics necessary for dose-response modeling on late effects. We, therefore, estimated incidences of necrosis with an exact 95% CI and qualitatively described data. Results from multiple studies were pooled by taking the weighted average of the reported crude rates from individual studies. RESULTS Treated cancers included ependymoma (n = 279 patients; 7 studies), medulloblastoma (n = 98 patients; 6 studies), any CNS tumors (n = 62 patients; 3 studies), and supratentorial high-grade gliomas (n = 10 patients; 1 study). The median interval between initial and reirradiation was 2.3 years (range, 1.2-4.75 years). The median cumulative prescription dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD22; assuming α/β value = 2 Gy) was 103.8 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy). Among 449 reirradiated children/AYA, 22 (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.3%) developed brain necrosis and 14 (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.2%) developed brain stem necrosis with a weighted median follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-7.4 years). The median cumulative prescription EQD22 was 111.4 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for development of any necrosis, 107.7 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for brain necrosis, and 112.1 Gy (range, 100.2-117 Gy) for brain stem necrosis. The median latent period between reirradiation and the development of necrosis was 5.7 months (range, 4.3-24 months). Though there were more events among children/AYA undergoing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated reirradiation, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .46). CONCLUSIONS Existing reports suggest that in children/AYA with recurrent brain tumors, reirradiation with a total EQD22 of about 112 Gy is associated with an approximate 5% to 7% incidence of brain/brain stem necrosis after a median follow-up of 1.6 years (with the initial course of radiation therapy being given with conventional prescription doses of ≤2 Gy per fraction and the second course with variable fractionations). We recommend a uniform approach for reporting dosimetric endpoints to derive robust predictive models of late toxicities following reirradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thankamma Ajithkumar
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Michele Avanzo
- Division of Medical Physics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Aviano IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, West German Cancer Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Soren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Radiation Oncology, and University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kotecha R, La Rosa A, Mehta MP. How proton therapy fits into the management of adult intracranial tumors. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S26-S45. [PMID: 38437667 PMCID: PMC10911801 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracranial tumors include a challenging array of primary and secondary parenchymal and extra-axial tumors which cause neurologic morbidity consequential to location, disease extent, and proximity to critical neurologic structures. Radiotherapy can be used in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage setting either with curative or palliative intent. Proton therapy (PT) is a promising advance due to dosimetric advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy with regards to normal tissue sparing, as well as distinct physical properties, which yield radiobiologic benefits. In this review, the principles of efficacy and safety of PT for a variety of intracranial tumors are discussed, drawing upon case series, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and randomized clinical trials. This manuscript explores the potential advantages of PT, including reduced acute and late treatment-related side effects and improved quality of life. The objective is to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence and clinical outcomes of PT. Given the lack of consensus and directives for its utilization in patients with intracranial tumors, we aim to provide a guide for its judicious use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Translational Medicine, Hebert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alonso La Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilson JS, Main C, Thorp N, Taylor RE, Majothi S, Kearns PR, English M, Dandapani M, Phillips R, Wheatley K, Pizer B. The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children and young adults with Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 2024; 167:1-34. [PMID: 38294638 PMCID: PMC10978619 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04510-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central nervous system (CNS) tumours account for around 25% of childhood neoplasms. With multi-modal therapy, 5-year survival is at around 75% in the UK. Conventional photon radiotherapy has made significant contributions to survival, but can be associated with long-term side effects. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) reduces the volume of irradiated tissue outside the tumour target volume which may potentially reduce toxicity. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of PBT and make recommendations for future research for this evolving treatment. METHODS A systematic review assessing the effects of PBT for treating CNS tumours in children/young adults was undertaken using methods recommended by Cochrane and reported using PRISMA guidelines. Any study design was included where clinical and toxicity outcomes were reported. Searches were to May 2021, with a narrative synthesis employed. RESULTS Thirty-one case series studies involving 1731 patients from 10 PBT centres were included. Eleven studies involved children with medulloblastoma / primitive neuroectodermal tumours (n = 712), five ependymoma (n = 398), four atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour (n = 72), six craniopharyngioma (n = 272), three low-grade gliomas (n = 233), one germ cell tumours (n = 22) and one pineoblastoma (n = 22). Clinical outcomes were the most frequently reported with overall survival values ranging from 100 to 28% depending on the tumour type. Endocrine outcomes were the most frequently reported toxicity outcomes with quality of life the least reported. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights areas of uncertainty in this research area. A well-defined, well-funded research agenda is needed to best maximise the potential of PBT. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO-CRD42016036802.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayne S Wilson
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Caroline Main
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicky Thorp
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
- The Christie Hospital Foundation Trust Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Saimma Majothi
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Pamela R Kearns
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martin English
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Madhumita Dandapani
- Children's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals' NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Robert Phillips
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK
| | - Keith Wheatley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Barry Pizer
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Johnson TS, MacDonald TJ, Pacholczyk R, Aguilera D, Al-Basheer A, Bajaj M, Bandopadhayay P, Berrong Z, Bouffet E, Castellino RC, Dorris K, Eaton BR, Esiashvili N, Fangusaro JR, Foreman N, Fridlyand D, Giller C, Heger IM, Huang C, Kadom N, Kennedy EP, Manoharan N, Martin W, McDonough C, Parker RS, Ramaswamy V, Ring E, Rojiani A, Sadek RF, Satpathy S, Schniederjan M, Smith A, Smith C, Thomas BE, Vaizer R, Yeo KK, Bhasin MK, Munn DH. Indoximod-based chemo-immunotherapy for pediatric brain tumors: A first-in-children phase I trial. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:348-361. [PMID: 37715730 PMCID: PMC10836763 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrent brain tumors are the leading cause of cancer death in children. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is a targetable metabolic checkpoint that, in preclinical models, inhibits anti-tumor immunity following chemotherapy. METHODS We conducted a phase I trial (NCT02502708) of the oral IDO-pathway inhibitor indoximod in children with recurrent brain tumors or newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG). Separate dose-finding arms were performed for indoximod in combination with oral temozolomide (200 mg/m2/day x 5 days in 28-day cycles), or with palliative conformal radiation. Blood samples were collected at baseline and monthly for single-cell RNA-sequencing with paired single-cell T cell receptor sequencing. RESULTS Eighty-one patients were treated with indoximod-based combination therapy. Median follow-up was 52 months (range 39-77 months). Maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and the pediatric dose of indoximod was determined as 19.2 mg/kg/dose, twice daily. Median overall survival was 13.3 months (n = 68, range 0.2-62.7) for all patients with recurrent disease and 14.4 months (n = 13, range 4.7-29.7) for DIPG. The subset of n = 26 patients who showed evidence of objective response (even a partial or mixed response) had over 3-fold longer median OS (25.2 months, range 5.4-61.9, p = 0.006) compared to n = 37 nonresponders (7.3 months, range 0.2-62.7). Four patients remain free of active disease longer than 36 months. Single-cell sequencing confirmed emergence of new circulating CD8 T cell clonotypes with late effector phenotype. CONCLUSIONS Indoximod was well tolerated and could be safely combined with chemotherapy and radiation. Encouraging preliminary evidence of efficacy supports advancing to Phase II/III trials for pediatric brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore S Johnson
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tobey J MacDonald
- Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rafal Pacholczyk
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dolly Aguilera
- Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ahmad Al-Basheer
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Manish Bajaj
- Department of Radiology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Zuzana Berrong
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert C Castellino
- Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kathleen Dorris
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Bree R Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Natia Esiashvili
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jason R Fangusaro
- Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nicholas Foreman
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Diana Fridlyand
- Department of Pediatrics, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cole Giller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian M Heger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Chenbin Huang
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nadja Kadom
- Department of Radiology and Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Eugene P Kennedy
- Lumos Pharma, Inc. (formerly NewLink Genetics Corporation), Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Neevika Manoharan
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Colleen McDonough
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca S Parker
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Vijay Ramaswamy
- Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Ring
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amyn Rojiani
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Pathology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ramses F Sadek
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sarthak Satpathy
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew Schniederjan
- Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amy Smith
- Department of Pediatrics, Arnold Palmer Hospital for Children, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Christopher Smith
- Lumos Pharma, Inc. (formerly NewLink Genetics Corporation), Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Beena E Thomas
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rachel Vaizer
- Department of Pediatrics, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kee Kiat Yeo
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Manoj K Bhasin
- Aflac Cancer & Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta and Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David H Munn
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gaito S, Burnet NG, Aznar MC, Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Crellin A, Indelicato D, Pan S, Colaco R, Rieu R, Smith E, Whitfield G. Proton Beam Therapy in the Reirradiation Setting of Brain and Base of Skull Tumour Recurrences. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:673-681. [PMID: 37574418 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
The therapeutic management of local tumour recurrence after a first course of radical radiotherapy is always complex. Surgery and reirradiation carry increased morbidity due to radiation-induced tissue changes. Proton beam therapy (PBT) might be advantageous in the reirradiation setting, thanks to its distinct physical characteristics. Here we systematically reviewed the use of PBT in the management of recurrent central nervous system (CNS) and base of skull (BoS) tumours, as published in the literature. The research question was framed following the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) criteria: the population of the study was cancer patients with local disease recurrence in the CNS or BoS; the intervention was radiation treatment with PBT; the outcomes of the study focused on the clinical outcomes of PBT in the reirradiation setting of local tumour recurrences of the CNS or BoS. The identification stage resulted in 222 records in Embase and 79 in Medline as of March 2023. Sixty-eight duplicates were excluded at this stage and 56 were excluded after screening as not relevant, not in English or not full-text articles. Twelve full-text articles were included in the review and are presented according to the site of disease, namely BoS, brain or both brain and BoS. This review showed that reirradiation of brain/BoS tumour recurrences with PBT can provide good local control with acceptable toxicity rates. However, reirradiation of tumour recurrences in the CNS or BoS setting needs to consider several factors that can increase the risk of toxicities. Therefore, patient selection is crucial. Randomised evidence is needed to select the best radiation modality in this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - N G Burnet
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - M C Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - G Marvaso
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - A Crellin
- National Lead Proton Beam Therapy NHSe, UK
| | - D Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - S Pan
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - R Colaco
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - R Rieu
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Smith
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - G Whitfield
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yamaguchi J, Ohka F, Motomura K, Saito R. Latest classification of ependymoma in the molecular era and advances in its treatment: a review. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:653-663. [PMID: 37288489 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Ependymoma is a rare central nervous system (CNS) tumour occurring in all age groups and is one of the most common paediatric malignant brain tumours. Unlike other malignant brain tumours, ependymomas have few identified point mutations and genetic and epigenetic features. With advances in molecular understanding, the latest 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of CNS tumours divided ependymomas into 10 diagnostic categories based on the histology, molecular information and location; this accurately reflected the prognosis and biology of this tumour. Although maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy is considered the standard treatment method, and chemotherapy is considered ineffective, the validation of the role of these treatment modalities continues. Although the rarity and long-term clinical course of ependymoma make designing and conducting prospective clinical trials challenging, knowledge is steadily accumulating and progress is being made. Much of the clinical knowledge obtained from clinical trials to date was based on the previous histology-based WHO classifications, and the addition of new molecular information may lead to more complex treatment strategies. Therefore, this review presents the latest findings on the molecular classification of ependymomas and advances in its treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junya Yamaguchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Fumiharu Ohka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazuya Motomura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ryuta Saito
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zaghloul MS, Hunter A, Mostafa AG, Parkes J. Re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive pediatric brain tumors: from radiobiology to clinical outcomes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:709-717. [PMID: 37194207 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2215439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children. Neurosurgical excision, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy represent the standard of care in most histopathological types of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Even though the successful cure rate is reasonable, some patients may develop recurrence locally or within the neuroaxis. AREA COVERED The management of these recurrences is not easy; however, significant advances in neurosurgery, radiation techniques, radiobiology, and the introduction of newer biological therapies, have improved the results of their salvage treatment. In many cases, salvage re-irradiation is feasible and has achieved encouraging results. The results of re-irradiation depend upon several factors. These factors include tumor type, extent of the second surgery, tumor volume, location of the recurrence, time that elapses between the initial treatment, the combination with other treatment agents, relapse, and the initial response to radiotherapy. EXPERT OPINION Reviewing the radiobiological basis and clinical outcome of pediatric brain re-irradiation revealed that re-irradiation is safe, feasible, and indicated for recurrent/progressive different tumor types such as; ependymoma, medulloblastoma, diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) and glioblastoma. It is now considered part of the treatment armamentarium for these patients. The challenges and clinical results in treating recurrent pediatric brain tumors were highly documented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed S Zaghloul
- Radiation Oncology department. National Cancer Institute, Cairo University & Children's Cancer Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Alistair Hunter
- Division of Radiobiology, Radiation Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ayatullah G Mostafa
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Egypt and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Cairo University, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jeannette Parkes
- Radiation Oncology Department, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tringale KR, Wolden SL, Casey DL, Kushner BH, Luo L, Pandit-Taskar N, Souweidane M, Cheung NKV, Modak S, Basu EM, Kramer K. Clinical outcomes of pediatric patients receiving multimodality treatment of second central nervous system relapse of neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30075. [PMID: 36349892 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In high-risk neuroblastoma, multimodality therapy including craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is effective for central nervous system (CNS) relapse. Management of post-CSI CNS relapse is not clearly defined. PROCEDURE Pediatric patients with neuroblastoma treated with CSI between 2000 and 2019 were identified. Treatment of initial CNS disease (e.g., CSI, intraventricular compartmental radioimmunotherapy [cRIT] with 131 I-monoclonal antibodies targeting GD2 or B7H3) and management of post-CSI CNS relapse ("second CNS relapse") were characterized. Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate factors associated with third CNS relapse and overall survival (OS) were used. RESULTS Of 128 patients (65% male, median age 4 years), 19 (15%) received CSI with protons and 115 (90%) had a boost. Most (103, 81%) received cRIT, associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1-0.5, p < .001). Forty (31%) developed a second CNS relapse, associated with worse OS (1-year OS 32.5%, 95% CI: 19-47; HR 3.8; 95% CI: 2.4-6.0, p < .001), and more likely if the leptomeninges were initially involved (HR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.3-4.9, p = .006). Median time to second CNS relapse was 6.8 months and 51% occurred outside the CSI boost field. Twenty-five (63%) patients underwent reirradiation, most peri-operatively (18, 45%) with focal hypofractionation. Eight (20%) patients with second CNS relapse received cRIT, associated with improved OS (HR 0.1; 95% CI: 0.1-0.4, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS CNS relapse after CSI for neuroblastoma portends a poor prognosis. Surgery with hypofractionated radiotherapy was the most common treatment. Acknowledging the potential for selection bias, receipt of cRIT both at first and second CNS relapse was associated with improved survival. This finding necessitates further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn R Tringale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Suzanne L Wolden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Brian H Kushner
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Leo Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Neeta Pandit-Taskar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark Souweidane
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nai-Kong V Cheung
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shakeel Modak
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ellen M Basu
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kim Kramer
- Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lim DH. Role of Radiotherapy in Patients With Relapsed Medulloblastoma. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2023; 11:22-27. [PMID: 36762805 PMCID: PMC9911706 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2022.0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
During the last three decades, the management of medulloblastoma (MBL) has made enormous progress with a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy. Despite this improvement, 20%-30% of patients with MBL remain at risk of disease recurrence, with its relapse being possibly fatal. To date, the salvage treatment for relapse remains challenging, and various approaches have been suggested for the retreatment. In this review, I have described the characteristics of patients with relapsed MBL, patterns of relapse and the most commonly prescribed treatment. Further, I have reviewed the studies on re-irradiation and its associated issues to conclusively suggest the RT recommendations for patients with relapsed MBL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Do Hoon Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review state of art and relevant advances in the molecular genetics and management of ependymomas of children and adults. RECENT FINDINGS Ependymomas may occur either in the brain or in the spinal cord. Compared with intracranial ependymomas, spinal ependymomas are less frequent and exhibit a better prognosis. The new WHO classification of CNS tumors of 2021 has subdivided ependymomas into different histomolecular subgroups with different outcome. The majority of studies have shown a major impact of extent of resection; thus, a complete resection must be performed, whenever possible, at first surgery or at reoperation. Conformal radiotherapy is recommended for grade 3 or incompletely resected grade II tumors. Proton therapy is increasingly employed especially in children to reduce the risk of neurocognitive and endocrine sequelae. Craniospinal irradiation is reserved for metastatic disease. Chemotherapy is not useful as primary treatment and is commonly employed as salvage treatment for patients failing surgery and radiotherapy. Standard treatments are still the mainstay of treatment: the discovery of new druggable pathways will hopefully increase the therapeutic armamentarium in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tripathi M, Deora H, Tripathi S, Ballari N. Role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of intracranial pathologies of pediatric population: Current concepts, limitations, and future directions. J Pediatr Neurosci 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/jpn.jpn_51_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
14
|
Hill RM, Plasschaert SLA, Timmermann B, Dufour C, Aquilina K, Avula S, Donovan L, Lequin M, Pietsch T, Thomale U, Tippelt S, Wesseling P, Rutkowski S, Clifford SC, Pfister SM, Bailey S, Fleischhack G. Relapsed Medulloblastoma in Pre-Irradiated Patients: Current Practice for Diagnostics and Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:126. [PMID: 35008290 PMCID: PMC8750207 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Relapsed medulloblastoma (rMB) accounts for a considerable, and disproportionate amount of childhood cancer deaths. Recent advances have gone someway to characterising disease biology at relapse including second malignancies that often cannot be distinguished from relapse on imaging alone. Furthermore, there are now multiple international early-phase trials exploring drug-target matches across a range of high-risk/relapsed paediatric tumours. Despite these advances, treatment at relapse in pre-irradiated patients is typically non-curative and focuses on providing life-prolonging and symptom-modifying care that is tailored to the needs and wishes of the individual and their family. Here, we describe the current understanding of prognostic factors at disease relapse such as principal molecular group, adverse molecular biology, and timing of relapse. We provide an overview of the clinical diagnostic process including signs and symptoms, staging investigations, and molecular pathology, followed by a summary of treatment modalities and considerations. Finally, we summarise future directions to progress understanding of treatment resistance and the biological mechanisms underpinning early therapy-refractory and relapsed disease. These initiatives include development of comprehensive and collaborative molecular profiling approaches at relapse, liquid biopsies such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a biomarker of minimal residual disease (MRD), modelling strategies, and the use of primary tumour material for real-time drug screening approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca M. Hill
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (S.C.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Sabine L. A. Plasschaert
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.L.A.P.); (M.L.); (P.W.)
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Christelle Dufour
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France;
| | - Kristian Aquilina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK;
| | - Shivaram Avula
- Department of Radiology, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L12 2AP, UK;
| | - Laura Donovan
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK;
| | - Maarten Lequin
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.L.A.P.); (M.L.); (P.W.)
| | - Torsten Pietsch
- Institute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Ulrich Thomale
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Pieter Wesseling
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands; (S.L.A.P.); (M.L.); (P.W.)
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Steven C. Clifford
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (S.C.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Stefan M. Pfister
- Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
- Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Bailey
- Wolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (S.C.C.); (S.B.)
| | - Gudrun Fleischhack
- Department of Pediatrics III, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (CTNBS), University Hospital of Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Doyen J, Aloi D, Groulier A, Vidal M, Lesueur P, Calugaru V, Bondiau PY. Role of proton therapy in reirradiation and in the treatment of sarcomas. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:550-553. [PMID: 34284969 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Reirradiation and irradiation of sarcoma is often difficult due to the frequent need for a high dose of radiation in order to increase tumor control. This can result in a greater risk of toxicity which can be mitigated with the use of proton therapy. The present review aims to summarize the role of proton therapy in these 2 clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Doyen
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France.
| | - D Aloi
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - A Groulier
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - M Vidal
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - P Lesueur
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Centre de Protonthérapie de Normandie, University of Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - V Calugaru
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - P Y Bondiau
- Department of radiation oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, University of Côte d'Azur, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cacchione A, Mastronuzzi A, Carai A, Colafati GS, Diomedi-Camassei F, Marrazzo A, Carboni A, Miele E, Pedace L, Tartaglia M, Amichetti M, Fellin F, Lodi M, Vennarini S. Rosette-Forming Glioneuronal Tumor of the Fourth Ventricle: A Case of Relapse Treated with Proton Beam Therapy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:903. [PMID: 34069450 PMCID: PMC8159123 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Rosette-forming glioneuronal tumors (RGNTs) are rare, grade I, central nervous system (CNS) tumors typically localized to the fourth ventricle. We describe a 9-year-old girl with dizziness and occipital headache. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a large hypodense posterior fossa mass lesion in relation to the vermis, with cystic component. Surgical resection of the tumor was performed. A RGNT diagnosis was made at the histopathological examination. During follow-up, the patient experienced a first relapse, which was again surgically removed. Eight months after, MRI documented a second recurrence at the local level. She was a candidate for the proton beam therapy (PBT) program. Three years after the end of PBT, the patient had no evidence of disease recurrence. This report underlines that, although RGNTs are commonly associated with an indolent course, they may have the potential for aggressive behavior, suggesting the need for treatment in addition to surgery. Controversy exists in the literature regarding effective management of RGNTs. Chemotherapy and radiation are used as adjuvant therapy, but their efficacy management has not been adequately described in the literature. This is the first case report published in which PBT was proposed for adjuvant therapy in place of chemotherapy in RGNT relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Cacchione
- Department of Paediatric Haematology/Oncology, Cell and Gene Therapy, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy; (A.M.); (E.M.); (L.P.); (M.L.)
| | - Angela Mastronuzzi
- Department of Paediatric Haematology/Oncology, Cell and Gene Therapy, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy; (A.M.); (E.M.); (L.P.); (M.L.)
| | - Andrea Carai
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Giovanna Stefania Colafati
- Oncological Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Imaging, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy; (G.S.C.); (A.M.); (A.C.)
| | - Francesca Diomedi-Camassei
- Department of Laboratories, Pathology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Antonio Marrazzo
- Oncological Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Imaging, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy; (G.S.C.); (A.M.); (A.C.)
| | - Alessia Carboni
- Oncological Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Imaging, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy; (G.S.C.); (A.M.); (A.C.)
| | - Evelina Miele
- Department of Paediatric Haematology/Oncology, Cell and Gene Therapy, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy; (A.M.); (E.M.); (L.P.); (M.L.)
| | - Lucia Pedace
- Department of Paediatric Haematology/Oncology, Cell and Gene Therapy, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy; (A.M.); (E.M.); (L.P.); (M.L.)
| | - Marco Tartaglia
- Genetics and Rare Diseases Research Division, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Maurizio Amichetti
- Proton Therapy Center, Hospital of Trento, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (M.A.); (F.F.); (S.V.)
| | - Francesco Fellin
- Proton Therapy Center, Hospital of Trento, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (M.A.); (F.F.); (S.V.)
| | - Mariachiara Lodi
- Department of Paediatric Haematology/Oncology, Cell and Gene Therapy, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, 00165 Rome, Italy; (A.M.); (E.M.); (L.P.); (M.L.)
| | - Sabina Vennarini
- Proton Therapy Center, Hospital of Trento, Azienda Provinciale per I Servizi Sanitari (APSS), 38123 Trento, Italy; (M.A.); (F.F.); (S.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mizumoto M, Fuji H, Miyachi M, Soejima T, Yamamoto T, Aibe N, Demizu Y, Iwata H, Hashimoto T, Motegi A, Kawamura A, Terashima K, Fukushima T, Nakao T, Takada A, Sumi M, Oshima J, Moriwaki K, Nozaki M, Ishida Y, Kosaka Y, Ae K, Hosono A, Harada H, Ogo E, Akimoto T, Saito T, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Matsuo T, Matsumura A, Masaki H, Hosoi H, Shigematsu N, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs): JASTRO and JSPHO Guidelines. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102209. [PMID: 33984606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are often treated with a multidisciplinary approach. This includes use of radiotherapy, which is important for local control, but may also cause adverse events in the long term, including second cancer. The risks for limited growth and development, endocrine dysfunction, reduced fertility and second cancer in children and AYAs are reduced by proton beam therapy (PBT), which has a dose distribution that decreases irradiation of normal organs while still targeting the tumor. To define the outcomes and characteristics of PBT in cancer treatment in pediatric and AYA patients, this document was developed by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology and National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohei Nakao
- Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Takada
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Moriwaki
- Department of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Department of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ako Hosono
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akira Matsumura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mak DY, Laperriere N, Ramaswamy V, Bouffet E, Murray JC, McNall-Knapp RY, Bielamowicz K, Paulino AC, Zaky W, McGovern SL, Okcu MF, Tabori U, Atwi D, Dirks PB, Taylor MD, Tsang DS, Bavle A. Reevaluating surgery and re-irradiation for locally recurrent pediatric ependymoma—a multi-institutional study. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab158. [PMID: 34988448 PMCID: PMC8694210 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The goal of this study was to evaluate extent of surgical resection, and timing and volume of re-irradiation, on survival for children with locally recurrent ependymoma. Methods Children with locally recurrent ependymoma treated with a second course of fractionated radiotherapy (RT2) from 6 North American cancer centers were reviewed. The index time was from the start of RT2 unless otherwise stated. Results Thirty-five patients were included in the study. The median doses for first radiation (RT1) and RT2 were 55.8 and 54 Gy, respectively. Median follow-up time was 5.6 years. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients from RT2 was 65 months. Gross total resection (GTR) was performed in 46% and 66% of patients prior to RT1 and RT2, respectively. GTR prior to RT2 was independently associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients (HR 0.41, P = 0.04), with an OS benefit (HR 0.26, P = 0.03) for infratentorial tumors. Median PFS was superior with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) RT2 (not reached) compared to focal RT2 (56.9 months; log-rank P = 0.03). All distant failures (except one) occurred after focal RT2. Local failures after focal RT2 were predominantly in patients with less than GTR pre-RT2. Conclusions Patients with locally recurrent pediatric ependymoma should be considered for re-treatment with repeat maximal safe resection (ideally GTR) and CSI re-irradiation, with careful discussion of the potential side effects of these treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Y Mak
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vijay Ramaswamy
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey C Murray
- Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Cook Children’s Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Rene Y McNall-Knapp
- Section of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Kevin Bielamowicz
- Section of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wafik Zaky
- Division of Pediatrics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - M Fatih Okcu
- Section of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Uri Tabori
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Doaa Atwi
- Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Peter B Dirks
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael D Taylor
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Abhishek Bavle
- Children’s Blood and Cancer Center, Dell Children’s Medical Center of Central Texas, Austin, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Reirradiation for Locoregional Recurrent Breast Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 6:100640. [PMID: 33506143 PMCID: PMC7814100 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.100640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Reirradiation poses a distinct therapeutic challenge owing to risks associated with exceeding normal tissue tolerances and possibly more therapeutically resistant disease biology. We report our experience with reirradiation for locoregional recurrent or second primary breast cancer. Methods and Materials Between 1999 and 2019, all patients with breast cancer treated with repeat breast/chest wall radiation therapy (RT) at our institution were identified. Adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney rank-sum, and unpaired t tests were used for statistical analysis. Freedom from locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis as well as overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Seventy-two patients underwent reirradiation. Median prior RT dose, reirradiation dose, and cumulative dose were 60 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 50-60.4 Gy), 45 Gy (IQR, 40-50 Gy), and 103.54 Gy2 (IQR, 95.04-109.62 Gy2), respectively. Median time between RT courses was 73 months (IQR, 29-129 months). Thirty-four patients (47%) had gross residual disease at time of reirradiation. Course intent was described as curative in 44 patients (61%) and palliative in 28 (39%). Fifty-two patients (72%) were treated with photons ± electrons and 20 (28%) with protons. With a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR, 10-43 months), grade 3 adverse events were experienced by 13% of patients (10% acute skin toxicity and 3% late skin necrosis). Time between RT courses and reirradiation fields was significantly associated with the development of grade 3 toxicity at any point. Proton therapy conferred a dosimetric advantage without difference in toxicity. At 2 years, locoregional recurrence-free survival was 74.6% and overall survival was 65.5% among all patients, and 93.1% and 76.8%, respectively, among curative intent patients treated without gross disease. Distant metastasis-free survival was 59.0% among all curative intent patients. Conclusions Reirradiation for locoregional recurrent breast cancer is feasible with acceptable rates of toxicity. Disease control and survival are promising among curative intent reirradiation patients without gross disease.
Collapse
|
20
|
Coleman C, Stoller S, Grotzer M, Stucklin AG, Nazarian J, Mueller S. Pediatric hemispheric high-grade glioma: targeting the future. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2020; 39:245-260. [PMID: 31989507 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-020-09850-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGGs) are a group of tumors affecting approximately 0.85 children per 100,000 annually. The general outcome for these tumors is poor with 5-year survival rates of less than 20%. It is now recognized that these tumors represent a heterogeneous group of tumors rather than one entity. Large-scale genomic analyses have led to a greater understanding of the molecular drivers of different subtypes of these tumors and have also aided in the development of subtype-specific therapies. For example, for pHGG with NTRK fusions, promising new targeted therapies are actively being explored. Herein, we review the clinico-pathologic and molecular classification of these tumors, historical treatments, current management strategies, and therapies currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Coleman
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland, 747 52nd Street, Oakland, CA, 94609, USA
| | - Schuyler Stoller
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, 625 Nelson Rising Lane, Box 0663, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Michael Grotzer
- Department of Oncology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ana Guerreiro Stucklin
- Department of Oncology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Javad Nazarian
- Department of Oncology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Mueller
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, 625 Nelson Rising Lane, Box 0663, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
- Department of Oncology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, M779, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lin YY, Wu HM, Yang HC, Chen CJ, Lin CJ, Chen YW, Chen HH, Wong TT, Hu YS, Chung WY, Shiau CY, Guo WY, Pan DHC, Lee CC. Repeated gamma knife radiosurgery enables longer tumor control in cases of highly-recurrent intracranial ependymoma. J Neurooncol 2020; 148:363-372. [PMID: 32405998 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03531-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a potential re-irradiation treatment for recurrent intracranial ependymoma after prior radiation therapy. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of repeated SRS in the treatment of recurrent intracranial ependymomas. METHODS This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients with residual or recurrent intracranial ependymomas who were treated with SRS between 1993 and 2018. Tumor progression was defined as a ≥ 10% increase in tumor volume. Tumor regression was defined as a ≥ 10% reduction in tumor volume. A tumor that remained within 10% of its original volume was defined as stable. Tumor control comprised tumor regression and stability. Time-dependent analyses were performed using two treatment failure endpoint definitions: (1) evidence of local tumor progression or distant metastasis (single SRS analysis), and (2) lack of tumor response to SRS (repeated SRS analysis). These analyses were adjusted for the competing risk of death. RESULTS The study comprised 37 patients (65 intracranial ependymomas) who underwent multiple SRS sessions (range: 1-7). Median age was 10.2 years (range: 0.8-53.8 years), and median tumor volume was 1.5 mL (range: 0.01-22.5 mL). The median radiation dose was 13.3 Gy (range: 7.9-22.0 Gy) at a median isodose line of 57% (range: 50-90%). Overall tumor control rates in the single SRS analysis adjusting for the competing risk of death were 53.6%, 30.5%, and 23.6% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Overall tumor control rates in the repeated SRS analysis adjusting for the competing risk of death were 70.6%, 50.4%, and 43.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Prior gross total resection was the only independent predictor of overall tumor control after SRS (aHR = 25.62 (1.55-422.1), p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Repeated GKRS appeared to be an effective treatment strategy for recurrent or residual intracranial ependymomas, with acceptable complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Yu Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Mei Wu
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Jen Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Chung-Jung Lin
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wei Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Hung Chen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tai-Tong Wong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yong-Sin Hu
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yuh Chung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Ying Shiau
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Cancer Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wan-Yuo Guo
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - David Hung-Chi Pan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Neurosurgery, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. .,School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. .,Brain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tsang DS, Murray L, Ramaswamy V, Zapotocky M, Tabori U, Bartels U, Huang A, Dirks PB, Taylor MD, Hawkins C, Bouffet E, Laperriere N. Craniospinal irradiation as part of re-irradiation for children with recurrent intracranial ependymoma. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:547-557. [PMID: 30452715 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes in children with relapsed, molecularly characterized intracranial ependymoma treated with or without craniospinal irradiation (CSI) as part of a course of repeat radiation therapy (re-RT). METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 31 children. Patients with distant relapse received CSI as part of re-RT. For patients with locally recurrent ependymoma, those treated before 2012 were re-irradiated with focal re-RT. In 2012, institutional practice changed to offer CSI, followed by boost re-RT to the site of resected or gross disease. RESULTS Median follow-up was 5.5 years. Of 9 patients with distant relapse after initial RT, 2-year freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) were 12.5% and 62.5%, respectively. There were 22 patients with local failure after initial RT. In these patients, use of CSI during re-RT was associated with improvement in 5-year FFP (83.3% with CSI vs 15.2% with focal re-RT only, P = 0.030). In the subgroup of patients with infratentorial primary disease, CSI during re-RT also improved 5-year FFP (100% with CSI, 10.0% with focal re-RT only, P = 0.036). Twenty-three patients had known molecular status; all had posterior fossa group A tumors (n = 17) or tumors with a RELA (v-rel avian reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A) fusion (n = 6). No patient developed radiation necrosis after fractionated re-RT, though almost all survivors required assistance throughout formal schooling. Five out of 10 long-term survivors have not developed neuroendocrine deficits. CONCLUSIONS Re-irradiation with CSI is a safe and effective treatment for children with locally recurrent ependymoma and improves disease control compared with focal re-irradiation, with the benefit most apparent for those with infratentorial primary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Louise Murray
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Radiotherapy Research Group, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Vijay Ramaswamy
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michal Zapotocky
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology, 2nd Medical School, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Uri Tabori
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ute Bartels
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Annie Huang
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter B Dirks
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael D Taylor
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cynthia Hawkins
- Pediatric Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Research progress on mechanism and dosimetry of brainstem injury induced by intensity-modulated radiotherapy, proton therapy, and heavy ion radiotherapy. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:5011-5020. [PMID: 32318844 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06843-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective method for treating head and neck cancer (HNC). However, RT may cause side effects during and after treatment. Radiation-induced brainstem injury (BSI) is often neglected due to its low incidence and short survival time and because it is indistinguishable from intracranial tumor progression. It is currently believed that the possible mechanism of radiation-induced BSI includes increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and damage of vascular endothelial cells, neurons, and glial cells as well as an inflammatory response and oxidative stress. At present, it is still difficult to avoid BSI even with several advanced RT techniques. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the most commonly used therapeutic technique in the field of RT. Compared with early conformal therapy, it has greatly reduced the injury to normal tissues. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) and heavy ion radiotherapy (HIT) have good dose distribution due to the presence of a Bragg peak, which not only results in better control of the tumor but also minimizes the dose to the surrounding normal tissues. There are many clinical studies on BSI caused by IMRT, PBT, and HIT. In this paper, we review the mechanism, dosimetry, and other aspects of BSI caused by IMRT, PBT, and HIT.Key Points• Enhanced MRI imaging can better detect radiation-induced BSI early.• This article summarized the dose constraints of brainstem toxicity in clinical studies using different techniques including IMRT, PBT, and HIT and recommended better dose constraints pattern to clinicians.• The latest pathological mechanism of radiation-induced BSI and the corresponding advanced treatment methods will be discussed.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hwang EJ, Gorayski P, Le H, Hanna GG, Kenny L, Penniment M, Buck J, Thwaites D, Ahern V. Particle therapy tumour outcomes: An updated systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:711-724. [PMID: 32270626 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Particle therapy (PT) offers the potential for reduced normal tissue damage as well as escalation of target dose, thereby enhancing the therapeutic ratio in radiation therapy. Reflecting the building momentum of PT use worldwide, construction has recently commenced for The Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research in Adelaide - the first PT centre in Australia. This systematic review aims to update the clinical evidence base for PT, both proton beam and carbon ion therapy. The purpose is to inform clinical decision-making for referral of patients to PT centres in Australia as they become operational and overseas in the interim. Three major databases were searched by two independent researchers, and evidence quality was classified according to the National Health and Medical Research Council evidence hierarchy. One hundred and thirty-six studies were included, two-thirds related to proton beam therapy alone. PT at the very least provides equivalent tumour outcomes compared to photon controls with the possibility of improved control in the case of carbon ion therapy. There is suggestion of reduced morbidities in a range of tumour sites, supporting the predictions from dosimetric modelling and the wide international acceptance of PT for specific indications based on this. Though promising, this needs to be counterbalanced by the overall low quality of evidence found, with 90% of studies of level IV (case series) evidence. Prospective comparative clinical trials, supplemented by database-derived outcome information, preferably conducted within international and national networks, are strongly recommended as PT is introduced into Australasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Ji Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Medicine, Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Liz Kenny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Penniment
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Buck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Thwaites
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Verity Ahern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stross WC, Malouff TD, Waddle MR, Miller RC, Peterson J, Trifiletti DM. Proton beam therapy utilization in adults with primary brain tumors in the United States. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 75:112-116. [PMID: 32184042 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The utilization of proton beam therapy (PBT) as the primary treatment of adults with primary brain tumors (APBT) was evaluated through query of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between the years 2004 and 2015. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology code for each patient was stratified into six histology categories; high-grade gliomas, medulloblastomas, ependymomas, other gliomas, other malignant tumors, or other benign intracranial tumors. Demographics of the treatment population were also analyzed. A total of 1,296 patients received PBT during the 11-year interval for treatment of their primary brain tumor. High-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, other glioma, other malignant, and other benign intracranial histologies made up 39%, 20%, 13%, 12%, 13%, and 2% of the cohort, respectively. The number of patients treated per year increased from 34 to 300 in years 2004 to 2015. Histologies treated with PBT varied over the 11-year interval with high-grade gliomas comprising 75% and 45% at years 2004 and 2015, respectively. The majority of the patient population was 18-29 years of age (59%), Caucasian race (73%), had median reported income of over $63,000 (46%), were privately insured (68%), and were treated at an academic institution (70%). This study characterizes trends of malignant and benign APBT histologies treated with PBT. Our data from 2004 through 2015 illustrates a marked increase in the utilization of PBT in the treatment of APBT and shows variability in the tumor histology treated over this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Stross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| | - Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Mark R Waddle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Robert C Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Greenberger BA, Yock TI. The role of proton therapy in pediatric malignancies: Recent advances and future directions. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:8-22. [PMID: 32139101 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has promised an advantage in safely treating pediatric malignancies with an increased capability to spare normal tissues, reducing the risk of both acute and late toxicity. The past decade has seen the proliferation of more than 30 proton facilities in the United States, with increased capacity to provide access to approximately 3,000 children per year who will require radiotherapy for their disease. We provide a review of the initial efforts to describe outcomes after proton therapy across the common pediatric disease sites. We discuss the main attempts to assess comparative efficacy between proton and photon radiotherapy concerning toxicity. We also discuss recent efforts of multi-institutional registries aimed at accelerating research to better define the optimal treatment paradigm for children requiring radiotherapy for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gupta T, Maitre M, Gupta P, Krishnatry R, Chatterjee A, Moiyadi A, Shetty P, Singh V, Chinnaswamy G, Epari S, Sahay A, Patil V, GodaSastri J. Extent of re-excision, sequence/timing of salvage re-irradiation, and disease-free interval impact upon clinical outcomes in recurrent/progressive ependymoma. J Neurooncol 2020; 147:405-415. [PMID: 32072441 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03434-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report clinical outcomes of salvage re-irradiation (re-RT) in recurrent/progressive ependymoma. METHODS Medical records of patients treated with curative-intent re-RT as multi-modality management for recurrent/progressive ependymoma were analyzed retrospectively. The linear-quadratic model was used to provide estimates of biologically effective dose (BED) of irradiation using an α/β value of 2 for late CNS toxicity for each course of irradiation and summated to derive cumulative BED without correcting for the assumed recovery. RESULTS A total of 55 patients (median age 10 years at index diagnosis) treated with curative-intent re-RT between 2010 and 2018 were included. Median time to first recurrence was 29 months with an inter-quartile range (IQR) of 16-64 months. Majority (n = 46, 84%) of patients underwent surgical re-excision of recurrent disease. Median interval from first course of irradiation (RT1) to second course (RT2) was 35 months (IQR = 26-66 months) with a median re-RT dose of 54 Gy in 30 fractions (range 40-60 Gy), resulting in median cumulative equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction (EQD2) of 106.2 Gy (range 92.4-117.6 Gy). Volume of re-RT was based on location and pattern of relapse, comprising uni-focal (n = 49, 89%), multi-focal (n = 3, 5.5%), or craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in 3 (5.5%) patients respectively. Thirty-six (66%) patients received platinum-based salvage chemotherapy either before or after RT2. At a median follow up of 37 months (range 6-80 months), the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the entire study cohort were 40% and 51% respectively. Gross total resection at recurrence; early salvage re-RT (prior to chemotherapy, if any); and longer (> 2 years) disease-free interval (DFI) were associated with better survival outcomes. Salvage re-RT was generally well tolerated with only 3 (5.5%) patients developing symptomatic radiation necrosis necessitating corticosteroids. CONCLUSION Extent of re-excision, sequence/timing of re-RT, and DFI impact upon outcomes in curative-intent, multi-modality salvage therapy for recurrent ependymoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejpal Gupta
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India.
| | - Madan Maitre
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - Priyamvada Gupta
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - Rahul Krishnatry
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - Abhishek Chatterjee
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| | - Aliasgar Moiyadi
- Departments of Neuro-Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Prakash Shetty
- Departments of Neuro-Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Vikas Singh
- Departments of Neuro-Surgical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Girish Chinnaswamy
- Departments of Pediatric Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Sridhar Epari
- Departments of Pathology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Ayushi Sahay
- Departments of Pathology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Vijay Patil
- Departments of Medical Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India
| | - Jayant GodaSastri
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC)/Tata Memorial Hospital (TMH), Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410210, India
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Seidensaal K, Harrabi SB, Uhl M, Debus J. Re-irradiation with protons or heavy ions with focus on head and neck, skull base and brain malignancies. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190516. [PMID: 31647306 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Re-irradiation can offer a potentially curative solution in case of progression after initial therapy; however, a second course of radiotherapy can be associated with an increased risk of severe side-effects. Particle therapy with protons and especially carbon ions spares surrounding tissue better than most photon techniques, thus it is of high potential for re-irradiation. Irradiation of tumors of the brain, head and neck and skull base involves several delicate risk organs, e.g. optic system, brainstem, salivary gland or swallowing muscles. Adequate local control rates with tolerable side-effects have been described for several tumors of these locations as meningioma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, chordoma or chondrosarcoma and head and neck tumors. High life time doses nonetheless lead to a different scope of side-effects, e.g. an enhanced rate of carotid blow outs has been reported. This review summarizes the current data on particle irradiation of the aforementioned locations and malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Réirradiations : quels critères décisionnels ? Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:526-530. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
30
|
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is a highly conformal form of radiation therapy, which currently represents an important therapeutic component in multidisciplinary management in paediatric oncology. The precise adjustability of protons results in a reduction of radiation-related long-term side-effects and secondary malignancy induction, which is of particular importance for the quality of life. Proton irradiation has been shown to offer significant advantages over conventional photon-based radiotherapy, although the biological effectiveness of both irradiation modalities is comparable. This review evaluates current data from clinical and dosimetric studies on the treatment of tumours of the central nervous system, soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the head and neck region, paraspinal or pelvic region, and retinoblastoma. To date, the clinical results of irradiating childhood tumours with high-precision proton therapy are promising both with regard to tumour cure and the reduction of adverse events. Modern proton therapy techniques such as pencil beam scanning and intensity modulation are increasingly established modern facilities. However, further investigations with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required, in order to be able to have clear evidence on clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Thomas
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tsang DS, Oliveira C, Bouffet E, Hawkins C, Ramaswamy V, Yee R, Tabori U, Bartels U, Huang A, Millar BA, Crooks B, Bowes L, Zelcer S, Laperriere N. Repeat irradiation for children with supratentorial high-grade glioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27881. [PMID: 31207154 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are very few studies about the role of repeat irradiation (RT2) for children with recurrent supratentorial high-grade glioma (HGG). It was the aim of this study to assess the effectiveness and safety of RT2 in this population. PROCEDURE This was a retrospective cohort study of 40 children age 18 years and under with recurrent supratentorial HGG who had received at least one course of RT. In-field reirradiation volumes included focal or whole brain RT, with doses ranging from 30 to 54 Gy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from the first day of RT2. RESULTS Fourteen patients underwent RT2. The median survival of these patients was 6.5 months. Patients with ≥12 months elapsed time between RT1 and RT2 experienced longer OS than patients who had < 12 months (P = 0.009). There was no difference in OS between patients with or without germline mutations (e.g., Lynch, Li-Fraumeni, or constitutional mismatch-repair deficiency, P = 0.20). Ten patients received RT2 that overlapped with RT1 volumes for locally recurrent disease. Of this group, 80% experienced clinical benefit from in-field RT2, defined as clinical/radiologic response or stable disease. Ninety-three percent completed the prescribed course of RT2, with one patient developing grade 3 radiation necrosis four months after RT2. When compared with 26 patients who were not offered reirradiation, those selected for RT2 had improved median survival from the time of first disease progression (9.4 vs 3.8 months, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation for children with recurrent supratentorial HGG is a safe, effective treatment that provides short-term disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carol Oliveira
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Bouffet
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cynthia Hawkins
- Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vijay Ramaswamy
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ryan Yee
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Uri Tabori
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ute Bartels
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Annie Huang
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barbara-Ann Millar
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bruce Crooks
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Lynette Bowes
- Janeway Child Health Centre, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Shayna Zelcer
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review discusses the evidence base behind current and emerging strategies of management of intracranial and spinal ependymomas in children, with a particular focus on aspects of surgical techniques, challenges and complications. RECENT FINDINGS The cornerstone of management remains maximal safe resective surgery, which has repeatedly been shown to correlate with improved survival. This is followed by focal conformal radiotherapy, although good results using proton beam therapy, with the potential for diminished side effects, are emerging. The role of chemotherapy remains largely unproven for paediatric ependymoma. Despite optimal management strategies, many children with ependymoma suffer from tumour recurrence. The standard of care for paediatric ependymoma comprises surgery and radiotherapy. Results of ongoing clinical trials will help shape its management in order to leverage our increasingly sophisticated understanding of the genetic drivers behind these tumours into survival benefit for this challenging group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian M Toescu
- Developmental Imaging and Biophysics Section, UCL-GOS Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - Kristian Aquilina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Thorpe CS, Niska JR, Girardo ME, Kosiorek HE, McGee LA, Hartsell WF, Larson GL, Tsai HK, Rossi CJ, Rosen LR, Vargas CE. Proton beam therapy reirradiation for breast cancer: Multi-institutional prospective PCG registry analysis. Breast J 2019; 25:1160-1170. [PMID: 31338974 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
To investigate adverse events (AEs, CTCAE v4.0) and clinical outcomes for proton beam therapy (PBT) reirradiation (reRT) for breast cancer. From 2011 to 2016, 50 patients received PBT reRT for breast cancer in the prospective Proton Collaborative Group (PCG) registry. Acute AEs occurred within 180 days from start of reRT. Late AEs began or persisted beyond 180 days. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney rank-sum tests were utilized. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LFRS). Median follow-up was 12.7 months (0-41.8). Median prior RT dose was 60 Gy (10-96.7). Median reRT dose was 55.1 Gy (45.1-76.3). Median cumulative dose was 110.6 Gy (70.6-156.8). Median interval between RT courses was 103.8 months (5.5-430.8). ReRT included regional nodes in 84% (66% internal mammary node [IMN]). Surgery included the following: 44% mastectomy, 22% wide local excision, 6% lumpectomy, 2% reduction mammoplasty, and 26% no surgery. Grade 3 AEs were experienced by 16% of patients (10% acute, 8% late) and were associated with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2 (P = 0.04), bilateral recurrence (P = 0.02), and bilateral reRT (P = 0.004). All grade 3 AEs occurred in patients receiving IMN reRT (P = 0.08). At 1 year, LRFS was 93%, and OS was 97%. Patients with gross disease at time of PBT trended toward worse 1-year LRFS (100% without vs. 84% with, P = 0.06). PBT reRT is well tolerated with favorable local control. BMI > 30, bilateral disease, and IMN reRT were associated with grade 3 AEs. Toxicity was acceptable despite median cumulative dose > 110 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua R Niska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Marlene E Girardo
- Division of Biostatistics, Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Heidi E Kosiorek
- Division of Biostatistics, Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Gary L Larson
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Henry K Tsai
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Carl J Rossi
- Scripps Proton Therapy Center, San Diego, California
| | - Lane R Rosen
- Willis-Knighton Proton Therapy Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Poel R, Stuessi Lobmaier A, Andratschke N, Unkelbach J, Tanadini-Lang S, Guckenberger M, Foerster R. Dosimetric comparison of protons vs photons in re-irradiation of intracranial meningioma. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190113. [PMID: 31264474 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Re-irradiation of recurrent intracranial meningiomas represents a major challenge due to dose limits of critical structures and the necessity of sufficient dose coverage of the recurrent tumor for local control. The aim of this study was to investigate dosimetric differences between pencil beam scanning protons (PBS) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photons for intracranial re-irradiation of meningiomas. METHODS Nine patients who received an initial dose >50 Gy for intracranial meningioma and who were re-irradiated for recurrence were selected for plan comparison. A volumetric modulated arc therapy photon and a pencil beam scanning proton plan were generated (prescription dose: 15 × 3 Gy) based on the targets used in the re-irradiation treatment. RESULTS In all cases, where the cumulative dose exceeded 100 or 90 Gy, these high dose volumes were larger for the proton plans. The integral doses were significantly higher in all photon plans (reduction with protons: 48.6%, p < 0.01). In two cases (22.2%), organ at risk (OAR) sparing was superior with the proton plan. In one case (11.1%), the photon plan showed a dosimetric advantage. In the remaining six cases (66.7%), we found no clinically relevant differences in dose to the OARs. CONCLUSIONS The dosimetric results of the accumulated dose for a re-irradiation with protons and with photons were very similar. The photon plans had a steeper dose falloff directly outside the target and were superior in minimizing the high dose volumes. The proton plans achieved a lower integral dose. Clinically relevant OAR sparing was extremely case specific. The optimal treatment modality should be assessed individually. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Dose sparing in re-irradiation of intracranial meningiomas with protons or photons is highly case specific and the optimal treatment modality needs to be assessed on an individual basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Poel
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,2 Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherer Institute (PSI), Villingen, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Robert Foerster
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tensaouti F, Ducassou A, Chaltiel L, Bolle S, Habrand JL, Alapetite C, Coche-Dequeant B, Bernier V, Claude L, Carrie C, Padovani L, Muracciole X, Supiot S, Huchet A, Leseur J, Kerr C, Hangard G, Lisbona A, Goudjil F, Ferrand R, Laprie A. Feasibility of Dose Escalation in Patients With Intracranial Pediatric Ependymoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:531. [PMID: 31293971 PMCID: PMC6598548 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: Pediatric ependymoma carries a dismal prognosis, mainly owing to local relapse within RT fields. The current prospective European approach is to increase the radiation dose with a sequential hypofractionated stereotactic boost. In this study, we assessed the possibility of using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), comparing VMAT vs. IMPT dose delivery. Material and methods: The cohort included 101 patients. The dose to planning target volume (PTV59.4) was 59.4/1.8 Gy, and the dose to SIB volume (PTV67.6) was 67.6/2.05 Gy. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the tumor bed plus residual tumor, clinical target volume (CTV59.4) was GTV + 5 mm, and PTV59.4 was CTV59.4 + 3 mm. PTV67.6 was GTV+ 3 mm. After treatment plan optimization, quality indices and doses to target volume and organs at risk (OARs) were extracted and compared with the standard radiation doses that were actually delivered (median = 59.4 Gy [50.4 59.4]). Results: In most cases, the proton treatment resulted in higher quality indices (p < 0.001). Compared with the doses that were initially delivered, mean, and maximum doses to some OARs were no higher with SIB VMAT, and significantly lower with protons (p < 0.001). In the case of posterior fossa tumor, there was a lower dose to the brainstem with protons, in terms of V59 Gy, mean, and near-maximum (D2%) doses. Conclusion: Dose escalation with intensity-modulated proton or photon SIB is feasible in some patients. This approach could be considered for children with unresectable residue or post-operative FLAIR abnormalities, particularly if they have supratentorial tumors. It should not be considered for infratentorial tumors encasing the brainstem or extending to the medulla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Tensaouti
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du, Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Ducassou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du, Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Léonor Chaltiel
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphanie Bolle
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | | | | | - Valérie Bernier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Line Claude
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Christian Carrie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Aymeri Huchet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, Bordeaux, France
| | - Julie Leseur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - Christine Kerr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Regional du Cancer Montpellier, Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Grégorie Hangard
- Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Albert Lisbona
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Régis Ferrand
- Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du, Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
- Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Weber DC, Lim PS, Tran S, Walser M, Bolsi A, Kliebsch U, Beer J, Bachtiary B, Lomax T, Pica A. Proton therapy for brain tumours in the area of evidence-based medicine. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190237. [PMID: 31067074 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This review details the indication of brain tumors for proton therapy and give a list of the open prospective trials for these challenging tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Pei S Lim
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Sebastien Tran
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Kliebsch
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Beer
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Bachtiary
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Tony Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Central nervous system ependymoma: clinical implications of the new molecular classification, treatment guidelines and controversial issues. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 21:1450-1463. [PMID: 30868390 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02082-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Ependymoma is an uncommon neuroepithelial tumor that may arise anywhere within the neuroaxis, both in children and in adults. It has been classically graded upon histopathological features, yet with limited clinical utility. Recently, DNA methylation profiling has provided a novel classification of ependymoma in nine molecular subgroups. This stratification method harbors prognostic value with supratentorial RELA-fusion and posterior fossa group A tumors showing a significantly shorter survival compared to the rest. Currently, the treatment of choice involves maximal safe resection and, in cases of residual disease, adjuvant conformal radiotherapy. Second-look surgery is also a feasible and recommended option for incompletely resected tumors. The role of chemotherapy is not yet established and can be considered in infants and children with relapsing disease or prior to re-intervention. Although targeted agents do not seem to play a role as adjuvant therapy, they are currently being tested for recurrent disease.
Collapse
|
38
|
Tsang D, Laperriere N. Re-irradiation for Paediatric Tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:191-198. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
39
|
Re-irradiation of locally recurrent pediatric intracranial ependymoma: Experience of the French society of children’s cancer. Radiother Oncol 2019; 132:1-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
40
|
Steinmeier T, Schulze Schleithoff S, Timmermann B. Evolving Radiotherapy Techniques in Paediatric Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:142-150. [PMID: 30639254 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Childhood cancer is rare and survival of childhood cancer has increased up to 80% at 5 years after diagnosis. Radiotherapy is an important element of the multimodal treatment concept. However, due to growing tissue, children are particularly sensitive to radiation-related side-effects and the induction of secondary malignancies. However, radiotherapy techniques have continuously progressed. In addition, modern treatment concepts have been improved in order to minimise long-term effects. Today, radiotherapy is used for various tumour types in childhood, such as sarcomas and tumours of the central nervous system. MATERIALS AND METHODS External beam therapy with either photons or protons and brachytherapy are predominantly used for the treatment of childhood tumours. Technical developments and features, as well as clinical outcomes, for several tumour entities are presented. RESULTS The development of radiotherapy techniques, as well as risk-adapted therapy concepts, resulted in promising outcome regarding tumour control, survival and therapy-related side-effects. It is assumed that proton therapy will be increasingly used for treating children in the future. However, more data have to be collected through multi-institutional registries in order to strengthen the evidence. CONCLUSION The development of radiotherapy techniques is beneficial for children in terms of reducing dose exposure. As compared with other modern and highly conformal techniques, particularly proton therapy may achieve high survival rates and tumour control rates while decreasing the risk for side-effects. However, clinical evidence for modern radiotherapy techniques is still limited today. An optimal patient triaging with the selection of the most appropriate radiation technique for each individual patient will be an important goal for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Steinmeier
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - S Schulze Schleithoff
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
| | - B Timmermann
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Thorp N, Gandola L. Management of Ependymoma in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019; 31:162-170. [PMID: 30616927 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 11/18/2018] [Accepted: 11/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Paediatric ependymomas are rare, malignant tumours arising throughout the central nervous system, but most frequently (in children) the posterior fossa. The standard of care for localised disease is gross total resection and focal radiotherapy, resulting in overall survival rates of up to 85%. Despite improvements in survival, treatment remains challenging, with persistently high rates of (rarely curable) relapse alongside risks of significant tumour and treatment-related toxicity. Systemic therapy is currently used to delay radiotherapy in very young children and in the management of metastatic or recurrent disease. Its use in the adjuvant setting is the subject of ongoing studies. Current research efforts are aimed at eliciting a better understanding of molecular biology, correlating this with tumour behaviour and defining targets for potential new agents. Prognosis seems to be related to the extent of surgical resection and the age at presentation. This article reviews clinical aspects of ependymoma management in children and young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Thorp
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.
| | - L Gandola
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Reirradiation in Pediatric Patients With Recurrent Brain Tumors: A Last Hope, But One With Greatly Feared Consequences. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103:1-4. [PMID: 30563654 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
43
|
Huynh M, Marcu LG, Giles E, Short M, Matthews D, Bezak E. Current status of proton therapy outcome for paediatric cancers of the central nervous system - Analysis of the published literature. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 70:272-288. [PMID: 30326423 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The most common solid tumours that develop in children are cancers of the central nervous system. Due to the increased rate of survival over the past decades, greater focus has been placed on the minimisation of long term side effects. In childhood cancer survivors, over 60% report one or more radiation-related late toxicities while half of these adverse events are graded as life-threatening or severe. Proton therapy enables high conformity with the planning target volume and a reduction in dose to areas beyond the target. Owing to the unique nature of dose delivery with proton therapy a reduction of low doses to normal tissues is achievable, and is believed to allow for a decrease in long-term treatment-related side effects. This paper aims to review the published literature around the effectiveness of proton therapy for the treatment of paediatric cancers of the central nervous system, with a focus on treatment outcomes and treatment-related toxicities. METHODS A search strategy utilising the Medline database was created with the intent of including all articles reporting on proton therapy, paediatric cancers, CNS tumours and treatment outcomes. The final search strategy included the following limitations: limited to humans, English, published from 2000 onwards. The final article count total was 74. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Proton therapy for the treatment of paediatric cancers of the central nervous system was found to provide survival and tumour control outcomes comparable to photon therapy. Reduced incidence of severe acute and late toxicities was also reported with the use of proton therapy. This includes reduced severity of endocrine, neurological, IQ and QoL deficits. Currently, extensive follow-up of proton patient populations still needs to be made to determine incidences of late-onset toxicities and secondary malignancies. Current evidence surrounding proton therapy use in paediatric patients supports its effectiveness and potential benefits in reducing the incidence of severe toxicities in later life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myxuan Huynh
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Loredana Gabriela Marcu
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Faculty of Science, University of Oradea, Oradea 410087, Romania
| | - Eileen Giles
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Donna Matthews
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rudà R, Reifenberger G, Frappaz D, Pfister SM, Laprie A, Santarius T, Roth P, Tonn JC, Soffietti R, Weller M, Moyal ECJ. EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of ependymal tumors. Neuro Oncol 2018; 20:445-456. [PMID: 29194500 PMCID: PMC5909649 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Ependymal tumors are rare CNS tumors and may occur at any age, but their proportion among primary brain tumors is highest in children and young adults. Thus, the level of evidence of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions is higher in the pediatric compared with the adult patient population.The diagnosis and disease staging is performed by craniospinal MRI. Tumor classification is achieved by histological and molecular diagnostic assessment of tissue specimens according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification 2016. Surgery is the crucial initial treatment in both children and adults. In pediatric patients with intracranial ependymomas of WHO grades II or III, surgery is followed by local radiotherapy regardless of residual tumor volume. In adults, radiotherapy is employed in patients with anaplastic ependymoma WHO grade III, and in case of incomplete resection of WHO grade II ependymoma. Chemotherapy alone is reserved for young children <12 months and for adults with recurrent disease when further surgery and irradiation are no longer feasible. A gross total resection is the mainstay of treatment in spinal ependymomas, and radiotherapy is reserved for incompletely resected tumors. Nine subgroups of ependymal tumors across different anatomical compartments (supratentorial, posterior fossa, spinal) and patient ages have been identified with distinct genetic and epigenetic alterations, and with distinct outcomes. These findings may lead to more precise diagnostic and prognostic assessments, molecular subgroup-adapted therapies, and eventually new recommendations pending validation in prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- Institute of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Didier Frappaz
- Département de Neuro-Oncologie, Centre Léon-Bérard, Institut d’Hématologie et Oncologie Pédiatrique et Adulte, Lyon, France
| | - Stefan M Pfister
- Division of Pediatric Neuro-oncology, German Cancer Research Center, DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany and Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Patrick Roth
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joerg Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität and DKTK partner site, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science University Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Medical physics in radiation Oncology: New challenges, needs and roles. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:375-378. [PMID: 29150160 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
46
|
Tsang DS, Burghen E, Klimo P, Boop FA, Ellison DW, Merchant TE. Outcomes After Reirradiation for Recurrent Pediatric Intracranial Ependymoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 100:507-515. [PMID: 29229328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the long-term outcomes and the optimal dose and volume for reirradiation of recurrent pediatric ependymoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with recurrent ependymoma treated with a second course of fractionated radiation therapy (RT2) were reviewed retrospectively. Eligible patients had localized, intracranial ependymoma at initial diagnosis that was treated with focal radiation (RT1) without craniospinal irradiation (CSI) and were aged ≤21 years at the time of RT2. The median doses of RT1, focal RT2, and CSI-RT2 were 59.4, 54, and 39.6 Gy, respectively. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was measured from the first day of RT2. RESULTS We included 101 patients in the study. The median interval between RT1 and RT2 was 26.8 months (interquartile range, 18.0-43.1). The median durations of OS and freedom from progression (FFP) were 75.1 and 27.3 months, respectively. Male sex and anaplastic histology at recurrence were associated with decreased OS and FFP on multivariate analysis. Distant-only failure treated with CSI-RT2 was independently associated with improved OS compared with individuals with local failure treated with focal RT2 (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.87). Among individuals experiencing any distant failure after RT1, gain of chromosome 1q was adversely associated with poorer OS (hazard ratio 3.5; 95% confidence interval 1.1-10.6). No distant-only failures were observed in individuals with RT1 local failure who received CSI-RT2 (n=10). The 10-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 radiation necrosis after RT2 was 7.9%. CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation for relapsed pediatric ependymoma was well tolerated by most patients and resulted in long-term survival in a subset of patients. The best results were observed in patients who experienced distant-only failure after RT1 and were treated with CSI as part of RT2, without anaplasia at recurrence. The option of reirradiation should be discussed with patients who develop recurrent ependymoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek S Tsang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Elizabeth Burghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Paul Klimo
- Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Frederick A Boop
- Department of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - David W Ellison
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Thomas E Merchant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Systematic assessment of clinical outcomes and toxicities of proton radiotherapy for reirradiation. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:21-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 08/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
48
|
A prospective study of proton reirradiation for recurrent and secondary soft tissue sarcoma. Radiother Oncol 2017; 124:271-276. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Revised: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
49
|
Mizumoto M, Oshiro Y, Yamamoto T, Kohzuki H, Sakurai H. Proton Beam Therapy for Pediatric Brain Tumor. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2017; 57:343-355. [PMID: 28603224 PMCID: PMC5566707 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2017-0003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a major cause of childhood death, with central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms being the second most common pediatric malignancy, following hematological cancer. Treatment of pediatric CNS malignancies requires multimodal treatment using a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, and advances in these treatments have given favorable results and longer survival. However, treatment-related toxicities have also occurred, particularly for radiotherapy, after which secondary cancer, reduced function of irradiated organs, and retarded growth are significant problems. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a particle radiotherapy with excellent dose localization that permits treatment of liver and lung cancer by administration of a high dose to the tumor while minimizing damage to surrounding normal tissues. Thus, PBT has the potential advantages for pediatric cancer. In this context, we review the current knowledge on PBT for treatment of pediatric CNS malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yoshiko Oshiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Haresh KP, Gandhi AK, Mallick S, Benson R, Gupta S, Sharma DN, Julka PK, Rath GK. Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes of Intracranial Ependymoma Treated with Multimodality Approach. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2017; 38:420-426. [PMID: 29333005 PMCID: PMC5759057 DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_202_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to analyze treatment outcomes of intracranial ependymoma (ICE) treated at our institute with multimodality approach. Materials and Methods: Demography, treatment details, and survival data of 40 patients (2005–2012) were collected in a predesigned pro forma. Kaplan Meier method was used to analyze disease-free survival (DFS) and the impact of prognostic factors was determined using univariate analysis (log-rank test). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox-proportional hazard model. SPSS version 21.0 was used for all statistical analysis. Results: Male:female ratio was 29:11. Gross total resection: subtotal resection or less was 42.5%: 57.5%. A total of 16 patients (40%) had anaplastic histology. All except two patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Four patients received concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide [TMZ]) and 10 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (6 carboplatin plus etoposide; 4 TMZ). Median follows up was 18 months (2–60 months). Median DFS for the entire cohort was 22.42 months. The estimated 1, 2, and 3 years DFS was found to be 58.5%, 41%, and 30.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients receiving higher radiation dose (56 Gray vs. 60 Gray; hazard ratio [HR] 0.366; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.142–0.9553; P = 0.02) and lower MIB labeling index (<20 vs. ≥20; HR 0.238; 95% CI 0.092–0.617; P = 0.001) had a better DFS. Higher radiation dose continued to be an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (HR 0.212; 95% CI 0.064–0.856; P = 0.03). Conclusion: ICE has guarded prognosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy to a higher radiation dose improves survival. Higher MIB labeling index connotes a dismal survival despite the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunhi Parambath Haresh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Ajeet Kumar Gandhi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Supriya Mallick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Rony Benson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Subhash Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Daya Nand Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Pramod Kumar Julka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Goura Kisor Rath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B.R.A IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi,, India
| |
Collapse
|