1
|
Makita K, Hamamoto Y, Kanzaki H, Nagasaki K, Kochi Y, Kido T. Prognostic assessment of patients with bone metastatic renal cell cancer treated with palliative radiotherapy. Oncol Lett 2024; 28:482. [PMID: 39161334 PMCID: PMC11332580 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The present study investigated the prognosis of patients who received palliative radiotherapy (RT) for bone metastases (BMs) from renal cell cancer (RCC), and assessed the prognostic factors specific to BMs from RCC. A total of 109 patients with RCC and BMs who underwent RT for the first time were included in the study. Prognostic factors were evaluated using multivariate analysis and a scoring system based on regression coefficients was devised. The median follow-up time was 9 months, and the 0.5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 73.0%. In the multivariate analysis, the significant prognostic factors were higher performance status (≥2), no control of the primary site, disseminated metastasis, lymph node metastasis and multiple BMs. A score of 1 point was assigned to each risk factor. The median OS times were 19.0 and 5.0 months in patients with a total score of ≤1 (n=49) and >1 (n=60), respectively (P<0.01). In conclusion, a comprehensive prognostic assessment using these factors may be useful for predicting the prognoses of patients with BMs from RCC. In addition, this scoring system may be useful in selecting the optimal RT dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Makita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime 791-0280, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-0024, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8577, Japan
| | - Yasushi Hamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime 791-0280, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Kanzaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime 791-0280, Japan
| | - Kei Nagasaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime 791-0280, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kochi
- Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan
| | - Teruhito Kido
- Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime 791-0295, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dawson LA, Ringash J, Fairchild A, Stos P, Dennis K, Mahmud A, Stuckless TL, Vincent F, Roberge D, Follwell M, Wong RKW, Jonker DJ, Knox JJ, Zimmermann C, Wong P, Barry AS, Gaudet M, Wong RKS, Purdie TG, Tu D, O'Callaghan CJ. Palliative radiotherapy versus best supportive care in patients with painful hepatic cancer (CCTG HE1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2024:S1470-2045(24)00438-8. [PMID: 39245060 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00438-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative treatment options for painful hepatic cancer can be restricted due to patients eventually becoming refractory to standard treatment. The aim of this study was to determine whether radiotherapy improves hepatic pain from cancer. METHODS In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial (CCTG HE1) done in nine cancer centres across Canada, we included patients aged 18 years or older with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases, who were refractory to standard treatment, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-3, with life expectancy of more than 3 months, and pain or discomfort at its worst in the past 24 hours on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) of at least 4 out of 10, which was stable for up to 7 days before randomisation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a minimisation method after stratification by centre and type of cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma vs liver metastases), to single-fraction radiotherapy (8 Gy) to the liver with 8 mg ondansetron (or equivalent) orally and 4 mg dexamethasone orally given 1-2 h before radiotherapy plus best supportive care (including non-opioid or opioid analgesia, or dexamethasone, or a combination of these) or best supportive care alone. The primary endpoint was improvement in patient-reported liver cancer pain or discomfort of at least 2 points on worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month after randomisation. All patients with both baseline and 1-month assessments were included in the primary endpoint analysis. Safety was assessed in all patients randomly assigned to treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511522, and is complete. FINDINGS Between July 25, 2015, and June 2, 2022, 66 patients were screened and randomly assigned to radiotherapy plus best supportive care (n=33) or best supportive care (n=33). Median age was 65 years (IQR 57-72), 37 (56%) of 66 patients were male, 29 (44%) were female, 43 (65%) had liver metastases, and 23 (35%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (data on race and ethnicity were not collected). As of data cutoff (Sept 8, 2022), median follow-up was 3·2 months (95% CI 3·0-3·4). 24 (73%) of 33 in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group and 18 (55%) of 33 in the best supportive care only group completed baseline and 1-month assessments. An improvement in hepatic pain of at least 2 points in worst pain intensity on the BPI at 1 month was seen in 16 (67%) of 24 patients in the radiotherapy plus best supportive care group versus four (22%) of 18 patients in the best supportive care group (p=0·0042). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events within 1 month after randomisation were abdominal pain (three [9%] of 33 in the radiotherapy group vs one [3%] of 33 in best supportive care group) and ascites (two [6%] vs one [3%]). No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths were observed. INTERPRETATION Single-fraction radiotherapy plus best supportive care improved pain compared with best supportive care alone in patients with liver cancer, and could be considered a standard palliative treatment. FUNDING Canadian Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Dawson
- University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Jolie Ringash
- University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Paul Stos
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Kristopher Dennis
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Cancer Centre Southeastern Ontario, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Francois Vincent
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Services Sociaux, Mauricie-Centre-du Québec, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Raimond K W Wong
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Derek J Jonker
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer J Knox
- University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philip Wong
- University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aisling S Barry
- Cancer Research at University College Cork, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Marc Gaudet
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rebecca K S Wong
- University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thomas G Purdie
- University Health Network-Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dongsheng Tu
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kaganda Bomboka V, Galietta E, Donati CM, Cellini F, Rossi R, Buwenge M, Wondemagegnehu T, Deressa BT, Uddin AK, Sumon MA, Vadalà M, Maltoni M, Morganti AG. Assessing the effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 68:495-504. [PMID: 38577713 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Palliative radiotherapy (RT) effectively relieves pain in patients with bone metastases (BMs). Furthermore, several clinical trials, in most cases conducted in high-income countries (HICs), proved that single-fraction RT is equally effective compared to multi-fractionated RT. However, the evidence is scarce regarding low/middle-income countries (LMICs), where the diagnosis of BMs could be later and RT techniques less advanced. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate the efficacy of palliative RT of BMs in the LMIC setting. A literature search was performed independently by two authors on the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases. Overall, 333 records were screened and after the selection process, 11 papers were included in the analysis. Complete pain response rates ranged from 11.5% to 37.1% (median: 22%) for single-fraction RT and from 0% to 35.1% (median: 19%) for multi-fractionated RT. Partial pain response rates ranged from 23.1% to 76.9% (median: 53.8%) for single fraction RT and from 23.8% to 84.6% (median: 65%) for multi-fractionated RT. Four randomized trials compared single-fraction RT with multiple-fraction RT and none of them showed significant differences in terms of pain relief. Our analysis showed that pain response rates after palliative RT recorded in LMIC are like those reported in studies performed in HIC. Even in this setting, RT in single fraction shows comparable pain response rates to multifractional RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Von Kaganda Bomboka
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Erika Galietta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Costanza Maria Donati
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Roma, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Romina Rossi
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Tigeneh Wondemagegnehu
- Radiotherapy Department, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Department of Clinical Oncology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | | | - Afm Kamal Uddin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, United Hospital Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Mostafa A Sumon
- Radiation Oncology, Kurmitola General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Maria Vadalà
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Maltoni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arakil N, Akhund SA, Elaasser B, Mohammad KS. Intersecting Paths: Unraveling the Complex Journey of Cancer to Bone Metastasis. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1075. [PMID: 38791037 PMCID: PMC11117796 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12051075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The phenomenon of bone metastases presents a significant challenge within the context of advanced cancer treatments, particularly pertaining to breast, prostate, and lung cancers. These metastatic occurrences stem from the dissemination of cancerous cells into the bone, thereby interrupting the equilibrium between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Such disruption results in skeletal complications, adversely affecting patient morbidity and quality of life. This review discusses the intricate interplay between cancer cells and the bone microenvironment, positing the bone not merely as a passive recipient of metastatic cells but as an active contributor to cancer progression through its distinctive biochemical and cellular makeup. A thorough examination of bone structure and the dynamics of bone remodeling is undertaken, elucidating how metastatic cancer cells exploit these processes. This review explores the genetic and molecular pathways that underpin the onset and development of bone metastases. Particular emphasis is placed on the roles of cytokines and growth factors in facilitating osteoclastogenesis and influencing osteoblast activity. Additionally, this paper offers a meticulous critique of current diagnostic methodologies, ranging from conventional radiography to advanced molecular imaging techniques, and discusses the implications of a nuanced understanding of bone metastasis biology for therapeutic intervention. This includes the development of targeted therapies and strategies for managing bone pain and other skeletal-related events. Moreover, this review underscores the imperative of ongoing research efforts aimed at identifying novel therapeutic targets and refining management approaches for bone metastases. It advocates for a multidisciplinary strategy that integrates advancements in medical oncology and radiology with insights derived from molecular biology and genetics, to enhance prognostic outcomes and the quality of life for patients afflicted by this debilitating condition. In summary, bone metastases constitute a complex issue that demands a comprehensive and informed approach to treatment. This article contributes to the ongoing discourse by consolidating existing knowledge and identifying avenues for future investigation, with the overarching objective of ameliorating patient care in the domain of oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Khalid S. Mohammad
- Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 1153, Saudi Arabia; (N.A.); (S.A.A.); (B.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoshimura M, Yamauchi C, Sanuki N, Hamamoto Y, Hirata K, Kawamori J, Kawamura M, Ogita M, Yamamoto Y, Iwata H, Saji S. The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for radiation treatment of breast cancer, 2022 edition. Breast Cancer 2024; 31:347-357. [PMID: 38578563 PMCID: PMC11045565 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-024-01568-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
The Breast Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines, organized by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS), were published in 2022. We present the English version of the Radiation Therapy (RT) section of the guidelines. The JBCS formed a task force to update the 2018 version of the JBCS Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Background Questions (BQs) contain the standard treatments for breast cancer in clinical practice, whereas the Clinical Questions (CQs) address daily clinical questions that remain controversial. Future Research Questions (FRQs) explore the subjects that are considered important issues, despite there being insufficient data for inclusion as CQs. The task force selected the 12 BQs, 8 CQs, and 6 FRQs for the RT section. For each CQ, systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses were conducted according to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020, version 3.0. The recommendations, strength of recommendation, and strength of evidence for each CQ were determined based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and finalized by voting at the recommendation decision meeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michio Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-kawahara‑cho, Sakyo‑ku, Kyoto, 606‑8507, Japan.
| | - Chikako Yamauchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shiga General Hospital, Moriyama, Japan
| | - Naoko Sanuki
- Department of Radiology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi, Japan
| | - Yasushi Hamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Kimiko Hirata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Jiro Kawamori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mami Ogita
- Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Yamamoto
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hiroji Iwata
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shigehira Saji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gillespie EF, Santos PMG, Curry M, Salz T, Chakraborty N, Caron M, Fuchs HE, Ledesma Vicioso N, Mathis N, Kumar R, O’Brien C, Patel S, Guttmann DM, Ostroff JS, Salner AL, Panoff JE, McIntosh AF, Pfister DG, Vaynrub M, Yang JT, Lipitz-Snyderman A. Implementation Strategies to Promote Short-Course Radiation for Bone Metastases. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2411717. [PMID: 38787561 PMCID: PMC11127116 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance For patients with nonspine bone metastases, short-course radiotherapy (RT) can reduce patient burden without sacrificing clinical benefit. However, there is great variation in uptake of short-course RT across practice settings. Objective To evaluate whether a set of 3 implementation strategies facilitates increased adoption of a consensus recommendation to treat nonspine bone metastases with short-course RT (ie, ≤5 fractions). Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized quality improvement study was conducted at 3 community-based cancer centers within an existing academic-community partnership. Rollout was initiated in 3-month increments between October 2021 and May 2022. Participants included treating physicians and patients receiving RT for nonspine bone metastases. Data analysis was performed from October 2022 to May 2023. Exposures Three implementation strategies-(1) dissemination of published consensus guidelines, (2) personalized audit-and-feedback reports, and (3) an email-based electronic consultation platform (eConsult)-were rolled out to physicians. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was adherence to the consensus recommendation of short-course RT for nonspine bone metastases. Mixed-effects logistic regression at the bone metastasis level was used to model associations between the exposure of physicians to the set of strategies (preimplementation vs postimplementation) and short-course RT, while accounting for patient and physician characteristics and calendar time, with a random effect for physician. Physician surveys were administered before implementation and after implementation to assess feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of each strategy. Results Forty-five physicians treated 714 patients (median [IQR] age at treatment start, 67 [59-75] years; 343 women [48%]) with 838 unique nonspine bone metastases during the study period. Implementing the set of strategies was not associated with use of short-course RT (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.45-1.34; P = .40), with unadjusted adherence rates of 53% (444 lesions) preimplementation vs 56% (469 lesions) postimplementation; however, the adjusted odds of adherence increased with calendar time (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.20-2.36; P = .003). All 3 implementation strategies were perceived as being feasible, acceptable, and appropriate; only the perception of audit-and-feedback appropriateness changed before vs after implementation (19 of 29 physicians [66%] vs 27 of 30 physicians [90%]; P = .03, Fisher exact test), with 20 physicians (67%) preferring reports quarterly. Conclusions and Relevance In this quality improvement study, a multicomponent set of implementation strategies was not associated with increased use of short-course RT within an academic-community partnership. However, practice improved with time, perhaps owing to secular trends or physician awareness of the study. Audit-and-feedback was more appropriate than anticipated. Findings support the need to investigate optimal approaches for promoting evidence-based radiation practice across settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin F. Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle
| | - Patricia Mae G. Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael Curry
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Talya Salz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nirjhar Chakraborty
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael Caron
- Department of Strategic Partnerships, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hannah E. Fuchs
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nahomy Ledesma Vicioso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Noah Mathis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rahul Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami
| | - Connor O’Brien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Shivani Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lehigh Valley Cancer Institute, Allentown, Pennsylvania
| | - David M. Guttmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jamie S. Ostroff
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew L. Salner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut
| | - Joseph E. Panoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami
| | - Alyson F. McIntosh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lehigh Valley Cancer Institute, Allentown, Pennsylvania
| | - David G. Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Max Vaynrub
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan T. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Allison Lipitz-Snyderman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Roos D, Millar J. Palliative radiation therapy: Can we do better? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 68:303-306. [PMID: 38544334 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Roos
- Radiation Oncology Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Radiation Oncology Department, Alfred Health and School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
O'Leary C, Cleary S, Linane H, Hamilton B, Jennings M, Lee Y, Lavan N, O'Reilly M, Twomey M. Palliative radiotherapy and the introduction of a Rapid Access Palliative Clinic in a national radiation oncology network. Ir J Med Sci 2024; 193:577-583. [PMID: 37606800 PMCID: PMC10961263 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03494-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) is commonly used to treat symptoms of advanced cancer. PRT has been associated with elevated 30-day mortality (30DM). A Rapid Access Palliative Clinic (RAPC) can streamline the treatment process for patients receiving treatment. AIMS We reviewed the PRT practices in a radiation oncology network in Ireland, and the implementation of a RAPC. Patient outcomes were assessed to inform future treatment decisions. METHODS A retrospective review of all patients who received PRT over 6 months in 2018 in St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network (SLRON) was undertaken. We assessed 30DM rates, demographics and referral to specialist palliative care (SPC) services. Subsequently, a retrospective analysis was conducted of a RAPC which ran for 6 months from 2019 to 2020. We assessed treatment data and mortality. RESULTS Over 6 months, 645 patients commenced PRT in the SLRON. The 30DM for this cohort was 15.8% (n = 102), with most patients having lung primaries. Of the 30DM cohort, only 55% (n = 56) were referred to SPC services and only 26.4% (n = 27) had performance status recorded. Over 6 months, 40 patients attended 28 RAPCs. Of these, 88% (n = 35) received PRT. Single fraction therapy was utilised in 60% and 48% of patients underwent CT simulation and treatment on the same day. Ultimately, 75% of patients received SPC referral. CONCLUSIONS Referral rates to SPC services and documentation of performance status were low in our 30DM retrospective review cohort. The RAPC facilitated quick treatment turnaround, fewer hospital visits and referral to SPC services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cian O'Leary
- St. Luke's Hospital Rathgar, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland.
| | - Sinead Cleary
- St. Luke's Hospital Rathgar, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Hannah Linane
- St. Luke's Hospital Rathgar, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Barbara Hamilton
- St. Luke's Hospital Rathgar, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Michelle Jennings
- St. Luke's Hospital Rathgar, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Yvonne Lee
- St. Luke's Hospital Rathgar, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Naomi Lavan
- St. Luke's Hospital Rathgar, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Maeve O'Reilly
- St. Luke's Hospital Rathgar, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Marie Twomey
- St. Luke's Hospital Rathgar, Highfield Road, Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grosinger AJ, Alcorn SR. An Update on the Management of Bone Metastases. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:400-408. [PMID: 38539021 PMCID: PMC11021281 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01515-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Increasing life expectancy among patients with advanced cancer has placed a greater emphasis on optimizing pain control and quality of life. Concurrently, significant advancements in radiotherapy for bone metastases have permitted for dose escalation strategies such as stereotactic radiotherapy. This review aims to provide updated information on the management of bone metastases in light of these developments. RECENT FINDINGS We reviewed recent studies regarding the role and details of external beam radiotherapy for bone metastases, with emphasis on differences by treatment site as well as intention (palliative versus ablative for oligometastases). Conventional palliative radiotherapy remains a mainstay of management. While stereotactic radiotherapy may augment durability of pain relief and even survival time, there are significant questions remaining regarding optimal dosing and patient selection. Radiotherapy for bone metastases continues to evolve, particularly with increasing use of stereotactic radiotherapy. Future studies are needed to clarify optimal dose, fractionation, modality, and patient selection criteria among different radiotherapy approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Grosinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Mail Code 494, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455-0110, USA
| | - Sara R Alcorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Mail Code 494, 420 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455-0110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burgess L, Nguyen E, Tseng CL, Guckenberger M, Lo SS, Zhang B, Nielsen M, Maralani P, Nguyen QN, Sahgal A. Practice and principles of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100716. [PMID: 38226025 PMCID: PMC10788412 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is the dominant treatment modality for painful spine and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM). Historically, this was achieved with conventional low dose external beam radiotherapy, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for these indications. Meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated improved pain response and more durable tumor control with SBRT for spine metastases. However, in the setting of NSBM, there is limited evidence supporting global adoption and large scale randomized clinical trials are in need. SBRT is technically demanding requiring careful consideration of organ at risk tolerance, and strict adherence to technical requirements including immobilization, simulation, contouring and image-guidance procedures. Additional considerations include follow up practices after SBRT, with appropriate imaging playing a critical role in response assessment. Finally, there is renewed research into promising new technologies that may further refine the use of SBRT in both spinal and NSBM in the years to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Burgess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Beibei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Nielsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vinod SK, Merie R, Harden S. Quality of Decision Making in Radiation Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024:S0936-6555(24)00067-0. [PMID: 38342658 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
High-quality decision making in radiation oncology requires the careful consideration of multiple factors. In addition to the evidence-based indications for curative or palliative radiotherapy, this article explores how, in routine clinical practice, we also need to account for many other factors when making high-quality decisions. Foremost are patient-related factors, including preference, and the complex interplay between age, frailty and comorbidities, especially with an ageing cancer population. Whilst clinical practice guidelines inform our decisions, we need to account for their applicability in different patient groups and different resource settings. With particular reference to curative-intent radiotherapy, we explore decisions regarding dose fractionation schedules, use of newer radiotherapy technologies and multimodality treatment considerations that contribute to personalised patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Vinod
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, Australia; South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - R Merie
- Icon Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia
| | - S Harden
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Starling MTM, Thibodeau S, de Sousa CFPM, Restini FCF, Viani GA, Gouveia AG, Mendez LC, Marta GN, Moraes FY. Optimizing Clinical Implementation of Hypofractionation: Comprehensive Evidence Synthesis and Practical Guidelines for Low- and Middle-Income Settings. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:539. [PMID: 38339290 PMCID: PMC10854666 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The global cancer burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), worsens existing disparities, amplified by the rising costs of advanced treatments. The shortage of radiation therapy (RT) services is a significant issue in LMICs. Extended conventional treatment regimens pose significant challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) and ultra-hypofractionated/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offer promising alternatives by shortening treatment durations. This approach optimizes the utilization of radiotherapy machines, making them more effective in meeting the growing demand for cancer care. Adopting HRT/SBRT holds significant potential, especially in LMICs. This review provides the latest clinical evidence and guideline recommendations for the application of HRT/SBRT in the treatment of breast, prostate, and lung cancers. It emphasizes the critical importance of rigorous training, technology, stringent quality assurance, and safety protocols to ensure precise and secure treatments. Additionally, it addresses practical considerations for implementing these treatments in LMICs, highlighting the need for comprehensive support and collaboration to enhance patient access to advanced cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephane Thibodeau
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | | | | | - Gustavo A. Viani
- Department of Medical Imagings, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Hematology and Oncology of University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, Brazil
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Andre G. Gouveia
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre 90619-900, Brazil
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Lucas C. Mendez
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Gustavo Nader Marta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Sirio Libanês, Sao Paulo 01308-050, Brazil
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Fabio Ynoe Moraes
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, Kingston General Hospital, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
- Latin America Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre 90619-900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Belka C, Bellut D, Cuccia F, Dahele M, Guninski RS, Josipovic M, Mancosu P, Minniti G, Niyazi M, Ricardi U, Munck Af Rosenschold P, Sahgal A, Tsang Y, Verbakel W, Alongi F. ESTRO clinical practice guideline: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109966. [PMID: 37925107 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recent progress in diagnostics and treatment of metastatic cancer patients have improved survival substantially. These developments also affect local therapies, with treatment aims shifting from short-term palliation to long-term symptom or disease control. There is consequently a need to better define the value of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of spinal metastases. METHODS This ESTRO clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic literature review conducted according to PRISMA standards, which formed the basis for answering four key questions about the indication and practice of SBRT for spine metastases. RESULTS The analysis of the key questions based on current evidence yielded 22 recommendations and 5 statements with varying levels of endorsement, all achieving a consensus among experts of at least 75%. In the majority, the level of evidence supporting the recommendations and statements was moderate or expert opinion, only, indicating that spine SBRT is still an evolving field of clinical research. Recommendations were established concerning the selection of appropriate patients with painful spine metastases and oligometastatic disease. Recommendations about the practice of spinal SBRT covered technical planning aspects including dose and fractionation, patient positioning, immobilization and image-guided SBRT delivery. Finally, recommendations were developed regarding quality assurance protocols, including description of potential SBRT-related toxicity and risk mitigation strategies. CONCLUSIONS This ESTRO clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations and statements regarding the selection of patients with spinal metastases for SBRT and its safe implementation and practice. Enrollment of patients into well-designed prospective clinical trials addressing clinically relevant questions is considered important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - N Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - D Bellut
- University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Department of Neurosurgery, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - F Cuccia
- ARNAS Civico Hospital, Radiation Oncology Unit, Palermo, Italy
| | - M Dahele
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Center Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R S Guninski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Josipovic
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P Mancosu
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Physics Unit, Radiation Oncology department, via Manzoni 56 I-20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy
| | - M Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - U Ricardi
- University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy
| | | | - A Sahgal
- Odette Cancer Center of the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada
| | - Y Tsang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wfar Verbakel
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Department, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar-Verona, Italy; University of Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cuccia F, Pastorello E, Franzese C, Belgioia L, Bignardi M, Federico M, Figlia V, Giaj Levra N, Badellino S, Borghetti P, Marvaso G, Montesi G, Pontoriero A, Fazio I, Ferrera G, Alongi F, Scorsetti M. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spine Oligometastases: A Multicentre Retrospective Study From the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:794-800. [PMID: 37714793 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a multicentre retrospective study of a series of patients who received SBRT for spine oligometastases. The efficacy of SBRT was evaluated in terms of local control as the primary endpoint. Survival outcomes were also analysed to identify predictive factors for clinical outcomes. Toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS Between March 2018 and July 2022, 183 lesions in 177 patients were analysed. In most patients, SBRT was delivered to a single spine metastasis (82%) for a median total dose of 21 Gy (14-35 Gy) in three fractions (one to five fractions) and a median BED10 = 119 Gy (57.7-152 Gy). Local control rates were 90.3% at 1 year, 84.3% at 2 years and 84.3% at 3 years. Distant progression-free survival rates were 33.1%, 18.5% and 12.4% at 1, 2 and 3 years, with prostate histology (P = 0.023), oligorecurrent disease (P = 0.04) and BED10 > 100 Gy (P = 0.04) found to be predictive on univariate analysis. A further oligometastatic progression was observed in 33 patients (18.6%) treated with a second course of SBRT, reporting at univariate analysis improved overall survival rates (P = 0.01). Polymetastases-free survival rates were 57.8%, 43.4% and 32.4%; concurrent therapy was related to improved outcomes at multivariate analysis (P = 0.009). Overall survival rates were 91.8%, 79.6% and 65.9%, with prostate histology and non-cervical metastases related to better overall survival at multivariate analysis. Pain-flare after SBRT was recorded in 3.3%; five patients underwent surgical decompression after SBRT; there were no grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS In our experience of only oligometastatic patients, spine SBRT gave excellent results in terms of safety and efficacy. Prostate histology and oligorecurrent disease were predictive factors for improved clinical outcomes; also, patients who experienced a further oligoprogression after SBRT maintained a survival advantage compared with polymetastatic progression. No severe adverse events were reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Cuccia
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
| | - E Pastorello
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy
| | - C Franzese
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Milan, Italy
| | - L Belgioia
- Radiation Oncology Department, San Martino Teaching Hospital, Genova University (DISSAL), Genoa, Italy
| | - M Bignardi
- Radiation Oncology Center, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Federico
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Clinica Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - V Figlia
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - N Giaj Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy
| | - S Badellino
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - P Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - G Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - G Montesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - A Pontoriero
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental and Morphological and Functional Imaging Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - I Fazio
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Clinica Macchiarella, Palermo, Italy
| | - G Ferrera
- Radiotherapy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Scorsetti
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ramadan S, Arifin AJ, Nguyen TK. The Role of Post-Operative Radiotherapy for Non-Spine Bone Metastases (NSBMs). Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3315. [PMID: 37444424 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-spine bone metastases (NSBMs) can cause significant morbidity and deterioration in the quality of life of cancer patients. This paper reviews the role of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) in the management of NSBMs and provides suggestions for clinical practice based on the best available evidence. We identified six retrospective studies and several reviews that examined PORT for NSBMs. These studies suggest that PORT reduces local recurrence rates and provides effective pain relief. Based on the literature, PORT was typically delivered as 20 Gy in 5 fractions or 30 Gy in 10 fractions within 5 weeks of surgery. Complete coverage of the surgical hardware is an important consideration when designing an appropriate radiation plan and leads to improved local control. Furthermore, the integration of PORT in a multidisciplinary team with input from radiation oncologists and orthopedic surgeons is beneficial. A multimodal approach including PORT should be considered for an NSBM that requires surgery. However, phase III studies are needed to answer many remaining questions and optimize the management of NSBMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif Ramadan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Andrew J Arifin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Timothy K Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Guckenberger M, Dahele M, Ong WL, Sahgal A. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases: Benefits and Limitations. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:159-171. [PMID: 36990633 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Progress in biological cancer characterization, targeted systemic therapies and multimodality treatment strategies have shifted the goals of radiotherapy for spinal metastases from short-term palliation to long-term symptom control and prevention of compilations. This article gives an overview of the spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) methodology and clinical results of SBRT in cancer patients with painful vertebral metastases, metastatic spinal cord compression, oligometastatic disease and in a reirradiation situation. Outcomes after dose-intensified SBRT are compared with results of conventional radiotherapy and patient selection criteria will be discussed. Though rates of severe toxicity after spinal SBRT are low, strategies to minimize the risk of vertebral compression fracture, radiation induced myelopathy, plexopathy and myositis are summarized, to optimize the use of SBRT in multidisciplinary management of vertebral metastases.
Collapse
|
17
|
Imlach F, Dunn A, Costello S, Gurney J, Sarfati D. Driving quality improvement through better data: The story of New Zealand's radiation oncology collection. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 67:119-127. [PMID: 36305425 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Aotearoa/New Zealand is one of the first nations in the world to develop a comprehensive, high-quality collection of radiation therapy data (the Radiation Oncology Collection, ROC) that is able to report on treatment delivery by health region, patient demographics and service provider. This has been guided by radiation therapy leaders, who have been instrumental in overseeing the establishment of clear and robust data definitions, a centralised database and outputs delivered via an online tool. In this paper, we detail the development of the ROC, provide examples of variation in practice identified from the ROC and how these changed over time, then consider the ramifications of the ROC in the wider context of cancer care quality improvement. In addition to a review of relevant literature, primary data were sourced from the ROC on radiation therapy provided nationally in New Zealand between 2017 and 2020. The total intervention rate, number of fractions and doses are reported for select cancers by way of examples of national variation in practice. Results from the ROC have highlighted areas of treatment variation and have prompted increased uptake of hypofractionation for curative prostate and breast cancer treatment and for palliation of bone metastases. Future development of the ROC will increase its use for quality improvement and ultimately link to a real time cancer services database.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Imlach
- Te Aho o Te Kahu/Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Alexander Dunn
- Te Aho o Te Kahu/Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Jason Gurney
- Te Aho o Te Kahu/Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand.,Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Diana Sarfati
- Te Aho o Te Kahu/Cancer Control Agency, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Safety and Feasibility of Radiation Therapy Combined with CDK 4/6 Inhibitors in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030690. [PMID: 36765648 PMCID: PMC9913652 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy in advanced hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer has led to practice-changing improvements in overall survival. However, data concerning the safety of CDK4/6i combination with radiotherapy (RT) are conflicting. A retrospective evaluation of 288 advanced breast cancer patients (pts) treated with CDK4/6i was performed, and 100 pts also received RT. Forty-six pts received 63 RT courses concurrently and fifty-four sequentially before CDK4/6i initiation (76 RT courses). Neutropenia was common (79%) and more frequent during and after concurrent RT than sequential RT (86% vs. 76%); however, CDK4/6i dose reduction rates were similar. In patients treated with CDK4/6i alone, the dose reduction rate was 42% (79 pts) versus 38% with combined therapy, and 5% discontinued treatment due to toxicity in the combined group. The risk of CDK4/6i dose reduction was correlated with neutropenia grade, RT performed within the first two CDK4/6i cycles, and more than one concurrent RT; a tendency was observed in concurrent bone irradiation. However, on multivariate regression analysis, only ECOG 1 performance status and severe neutropenia at the beginning of the second cycle were found to be associated with a higher risk of CDK4/6i dose reduction. This largest single-center experience published to date confirmed the acceptable safety profile of the CDK4/6i and RT combination without a significantly increased toxicity compared with CDK4/6i alone. However, one might delay RT for the first two CDK4/6i cycles, when myelotoxic AE are most common.
Collapse
|
19
|
Napoli A, De Maio A, Alfieri G, Gasperini C, Scipione R, Campanacci L, Siepe G, De Felice F, Siniscalchi B, Chiurchioni L, Tombolini V, Donati DM, Morganti AG, Ghanouni P, Catalano C, Bazzocchi A. Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Phase II Clinical Trial. Radiology 2023; 307:e211857. [PMID: 36594834 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Recent consensus statements and clinical trials have assessed the value of MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for pain palliation of bone metastases; however, a comparison with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has not been performed. Purpose To compare safety and effectiveness data of MRI-guided focused ultrasound and EBRT in the treatment of bone metastases. Materials and Methods Participants with painful bone metastases, excluding skull and vertebral bodies, were enrolled in a prospective open-label nonrandomized phase II study between January 2017 and May 2019 and underwent either MRI-guided focused ultrasound or EBRT. The primary end point was the overall response rate at 1-month following treatment, assessed via the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain (0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"). Secondary end points were improvements at 12-month follow-up in NRS and quality of life (QoL) measures, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), QoL-Questionnaire Cancer-15 Palliative Care (QLQ-C15-PAL), and QoL-Questionnaire Bone Metastases-22 (QLQ-BM22) and analysis of adverse events. Statistical analyses, including linear regression, χ2 test, and Student t test followed the per-protocol principle. Results Among 198 participants, 100 underwent MRI-guided focused ultrasound (mean age, 63 years ± 13 [SD]; 51 women), and 98 underwent EBRT (mean age, 65 years ± 14; 52 women). The overall response rates at 1-month follow-up were 91% (91 of 100) and 67% (66 of 98), respectively, in the focused ultrasound and EBRT arms (P < .001), and complete response rates were 43% (43 of 100) and 16% (16 of 98) (P < .001). The mean baseline NRS score was 7.0 ± 2.1 for focused ultrasound and 6.6 ± 2.4 for EBRT (P = .16); at 1-month follow-up, they were reduced to 3.2 ± 0.3 and 5.1 ± 0.3 (P < .001), respectively. QLQ-C15-PAL for physical function (P = .002), appetite (P < .001), nausea and vomiting (P < .001), dyspnea (P < .001), and QoL (P < .001) scores were lower in the focused ultrasound group. The overall adverse event rates were 15% (15 of 100) after focused ultrasound and 24% (24 of 98) after EBRT. Conclusion MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery and external beam radiation therapy showed similar improvements in pain palliation and quality of life, with low adverse event rates. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kelekis in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Napoli
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Alessandro De Maio
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Giulia Alfieri
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Chiara Gasperini
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Roberto Scipione
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Laura Campanacci
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Francesca De Felice
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Benedetta Siniscalchi
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Lorenzo Chiurchioni
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Davide Maria Donati
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Pejman Ghanouni
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Carlo Catalano
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- From the Department of Radiological, Pathological, and Oncological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, v.le Regina Elena 324, 00100 Rome, Italy (A.N., A.D.M., G.A., R.S., F.D.F., B.S., L. Chiurchioni, V.T., C.C.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (C.G., A.B.); Orthopaedic Service, Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (L. Campanacci, D.M.D.); Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy (G.S., A.G.M.); and Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (P.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Farris JC, Johnson AG, Carriere PP, Patel ZA, Nagatsuka M, Farris MK, Hughes RT. Palliative Appropriateness Criteria: A Pragmatic Method to Evaluate the Suitability of Palliative Radiotherapy Fractionation. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:67-72. [PMID: 35881861 PMCID: PMC9810497 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To describe a novel metric to aid clinical decision making between shorter versus longer palliative radiotherapy (PRT) regimens using objective patient factors. Materials and Methods: Patients receiving PRT at a single institution between 2014 and 2018 were reviewed. The time between PRT start and finish was calculated and divided by overall survival (in days from start of PRT) to generate the percent of remaining life (PRL). This value was compared across various clinical factors using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Factors identified with a significance level p < 0.01 were included in a novel Palliative Appropriateness Criteria Score (PACS) and were included in an online risk assessment tool to assist clinicians in patient-specific fractionation decisions. Results: Totally 1027 courses of PRT were analyzed. Median age was 64 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 3-4 in 22%. Primary malignancies included were lung (38%), breast (13.8%), prostate (9.3%), and other (39%). The indication for PRT was pain (61%), neurological (21%), or other (18%). Palliative regimens included 199 (19.4%) receiving single fraction, 176 (17.1%) receiving 2-5 fractions, and 652 (63.5%) receiving 10 fractions. Median follow-up was 83 days overall and 437 days for patients alive at last follow-up. Factors significantly associated with increased PRL (and included in the PACS) were male gender, ECOG 3-4, lung or "other" primary diagnosis (vs. breast or prostate), PRT indication (neurological dysfunction vs. pain/other), inpatient status, and extraosseous sites treatment. Death within 30 days was significantly associated with high-risk PACS categorization, regardless of fractionation scheme (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The PACS is a novel metric for evaluating the utility of PRT regimens to improve clinical decision making. Single fraction is associated with low PRL. When considering multifraction PRT regimens, the PACS identifies patients who may benefit from shorter courses of PRT and alternatively, low-risk patients for whom a more protracted course is reasonable. Prospective external validation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua C. Farris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Adam G. Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Patrick P. Carriere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary A. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Moeko Nagatsuka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael K. Farris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ryan T. Hughes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA.,Address correspondence to: Ryan T. Hughes, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Alghamdi MAA, Esam Mahmood S. Role of Surgery in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Insights from a Narrative Review. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2023; 15:349-358. [PMID: 37192867 PMCID: PMC10182804 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s405864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer is difficult to cure and has a worse prognosis with higher rates of mortality. Recently, breast surgery is believed to improve the survival rates among these women, but due to limited evidence, definite conclusions cannot be made. Therefore, we undertook this narrative review to synthesize the evidence from existing studies to assess the effectiveness of locoregional surgery and surgery of metastatic sites in improving the outcomes among women diagnosed with metastatic cancer disease along with the summary of current treatment guidelines. We reviewed PubMed and Embase and included both observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were published in English between 2000 and 2021. Outcomes were either survival, quality of life, toxicity related to local treatment assessed by mortality at the end of one month, progression-free survival, and breast cancer-specific survival. The main effect size assessed was hazard ratio with their 95% CIs. After literature search, we found 8 observational studies and 3 RCTs. The findings of the observational studies revealed that breast cancer surgery improves survival from 30% to 50% among women. However, findings from RCTs were mixed for local and distant progression survival. Surgery improved the local progression-free survival but worsened the distant progression-free survival. Besides, there was no effect of breast surgery on quality of life. Regarding the surgery of metastatic site, studies are complex with mixed findings and variation in survival depending upon the type of metastatic site and response to initial systematic therapy and other factors. Based on the existing mixed evidence, it is not possible to make firm and definite conclusions about the effectiveness of breast surgery in improving the survival or quality of life among women with metastatic breast cancer. In future, more RCTs are required with a larger sample size to confirm the findings of observational studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Syed Esam Mahmood
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence: Syed Esam Mahmood, Abha, 62529, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966550484344, Email
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mushonga M, Abdihamid O, Ntizimira C, Murenzi G, Ka S, Hammad N, Rubagumya F. The first Choosing Wisely Africa conference: a roadmap to value-based cancer care in Africa (16th December 2022, Senegal). Ecancermedicalscience 2023; 17:1517. [PMID: 37113728 PMCID: PMC10129401 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The Choosing Wisely campaign was formally launched in 2012 and a decade later, the inaugural Choosing Wisely Africa conference was held in Dakar, Senegal on 16 December 2022 supported by ecancer. Academic partners included Ministere de la Sante et de I'Action Sociale, Senegalese Association of Palliative Care, Federation Internationale des Soins Palliatifs, Universite Cheikh Anta diop de Dakar, Societe Senegalaise de Cancerologie and King's College London. There were around 70 delegates attending in person mostly from Senegal and a further 30 joining virtually. Ten speakers gave insight into Choosing Wisely from an African perspective and Dr's Fabio Moraes and Frederic Ivan Ting shared the Choosing Wisely experience from Brazil and the Philippines, respectively. This report therefore shares the highlights of the first Choosing Wisely Africa conference guided by topics discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda Mushonga
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Omar Abdihamid
- The Garissa Cancer Center, Garissa County Referral Hospital, Garissa, Kenya
| | | | - Gad Murenzi
- Einstein-Rwanda Research and Capacity Building Program, Research for Development (RD Rwanda) and Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Sidy Ka
- Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar 10700, Senegal
| | - Nazik Hammad
- Departments of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Fidel Rubagumya
- Einstein-Rwanda Research and Capacity Building Program, Research for Development (RD Rwanda) and Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda
- Department of Oncology and Department of Research, Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schiff JP, Zhao T, Huang Y, Sun B, Hugo GD, Spraker MB, Abraham CD. Simulation-Free Radiation Therapy: An Emerging Form of Treatment Planning to Expedite Plan Generation for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101091. [PMID: 36304132 PMCID: PMC9594122 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Herein we report the clinical and dosimetric experience for patients with metastases treated with palliative simulation-free radiation therapy (SFRT) at a single institution. Methods and Materials SFRT was performed at a single institution. Multiple fractionation regimens were used. Diagnostic imaging was used for treatment planning. Patient characteristics as well as planning and treatment time points were collected. A matched cohort of patients with conventional computed tomography simulation radiation therapy (CTRT) was acquired to evaluate for differences in planning and treatment time. SFRT dosimetry was evaluated to determine the fidelity of SFRT. Descriptive statistics were calculated on all variables and statistical significance was evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and t test methods. Results Thirty sessions of SFRT were performed and matched with 30 sessions of CTRT. Seventy percent of SFRT and 63% of CTRT treatments were single fraction. The median time to plan generation was 0.88 days (0.19-1.47) for SFRT and 1.90 days (0.39-5.23) for CTRT (P = .02). The total treatment time was 41 minutes (28-64) for SFRT and 30 minutes (21-45) for CTRT (P = .02). In the SFRT courses, the maximum and mean deviations in the actual delivered dose from the approved plans for the maximum dose were 4.1% and 0.07%, respectively. All deliveries were within a 5% threshold and deemed clinically acceptable. Conclusions Palliative SFRT is an emerging technique that allowed for a statistically significant lower time to plan generation and was dosimetrically acceptable. This benefit must be weighed against increased total treatment time for patients receiving SFRT compared with CTRT, and appropriate patient selection is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua P. Schiff
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Yi Huang
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Baozhou Sun
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Geoffrey D. Hugo
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Matthew B. Spraker
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Christopher D. Abraham
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dexamethasone Coanalgesic Administration in Steroid Naïve and Steroid Non-Naïve Patients for the Prevention of Pain Flares after Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases. Pain Res Manag 2022; 2022:6153955. [PMID: 36479161 PMCID: PMC9722317 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6153955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective Dexamethasone could be an effective prophylactic agent for the prevention of pain flares after palliative radiotherapy (RT) for uncomplicated bone metastases. To date, there are no data on its prophylactic coanalgesic (opioid-sparing) effect after RT in patients with complicated bone metastases compared to uncomplicated ones, which is the aim of our study. Methods Twenty-nine American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) III-IV patients, aged ≥18, treated with single-fraction 8 Gy/1 or multi-fraction 20 Gy/5 RT for painful uncomplicated bone metastases (steroid naïve patients, n = 14) or complicated ones (steroid non-naïve patients, n = 15), were examined retrospectively. All patients received parenteral dexamethasone (4 mg or 8 mg daily, 1 hour before RT, followed by the same dose for the next 4 days) along with their background and breakthrough pain opioid intake (morphine equivalents) during their 5-day in-hospital stay. Pain severity (numeric rating scale) and analgesic consumption were recorded at admission, daily during the hospital stay, and for 10 days following treatment. Binary logistic regression was used to determine predictive factors for pain flare occurrence. Results A higher ASA score is the only determinant positively influencing opioid consumption (P = 0.018) and pain flare as well (OR = 15.00; 95% CI: 2, 24-100, 48; P = 0.005). Lower dose 4 mg dexamethasone was revealed as a moderate analgesic agent in steroid naïve patients with no side effects, whereas in steroid non-naïve patients the predominantly higher dose 8 mg dexamethasone had minimal impact on pain flares prevention at the expense of more pronounced immunosuppression (P = 0.039). Conclusions Irrespective of the supporting evidence of dexamethasone potential for prevention of RT-induced pain flare, our data failed to reveal its efficacy in the real practice world (a case mix of uncomplicated and complicated bone metastases). Further dose-effect bigger studies are needed, identifying optimal doses of dexamethasone intake and its optimal duration in high-risk patients.
Collapse
|
25
|
Rades D, Delikanli C, Schild SE, Kristiansen C, Tvilsted S, Janssen S. A New Survival Score for Patients ≥65 Years Assigned to Radiotherapy of Bone Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194679. [PMID: 36230602 PMCID: PMC9563043 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Survival scores are important for personalized treatment of bone metastases. Elderly patients are considered a separate group. Therefore, a specific score was developed for these patients. Elderly patients (≥65 years) irradiated for bone metastases were randomly assigned to the test (n = 174) or validation (n = 174) cohorts. Thirteen factors were retrospectively analyzed for survival. Factors showing significance (p < 0.05) or a trend (p < 0.06) in the multivariate analysis were used for the score. Based on 6-month survival rates, prognostic groups were formed. The score was compared to an existing tool developed in patients of any age. In the multivariate analysis, performance score, tumor type, and visceral metastases showed significance and gender was a trend. Three groups were designed (17, 18−25 and 27−28 points) with 6-month survival rates of 0%, 51%, and 100%. In the validation cohort, these rates were 9%, 55%, and 86%. Comparisons of prognostic groups between both cohorts did not reveal significant differences. In the test cohort, positive predictive values regarding death ≤6 and survival ≥6 months were 100% with the new score vs. 80% and 88% with the existing tool. The new score was more accurate demonstrating the importance of specific scores for elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-451-500-45400
| | - Cansu Delikanli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Charlotte Kristiansen
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, 7100 Vejle, Denmark
| | - Søren Tvilsted
- Research Department, Zealand University Hospital, 4600 Køge, Denmark
| | - Stefan Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lubeck, 23562 Lubeck, Germany
- Medical Practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, 30161 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pathak RS, Tibdewal A, Kinhikar R, Wakeham K, Akbarov K, Cordero L, Khandavalli A, Agarwal JP. Practice Patterns and Perspectives on Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Metastatic Spine From Lower- and Middle-Income Countries. JCO Glob Oncol 2022; 8:e2200167. [PMID: 36103640 PMCID: PMC9812512 DOI: 10.1200/go.22.00167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We wanted to understand the current practice patterns and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) utilization for spine metastases in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS A questionnaire was designed to identify the current practice patterns of treating spine metastases, uptake of spine SBRT in routine care, dose fractionations commonly used, and the perceived benefits and toxicities of using ablative doses. Individuals registering for a spine SBRT workshop were requested to answer the questionnaire. RESULTS We received 395 responses from radiation oncologists (ROs) working in 12 different LMICs. The majority of respondents were from an academic institute (57.5%). Two hundred seventy-four respondents further identified themselves from the government/public sector (44.89%), corporate/private sector (47.89%), not-for-profit organization (5.4%), or public-private partnership (5.4%). The respondents indicated that 8.43%, 27.46%, 41.73%, and 10.04% of the spine metastases patients are treated using clinical marking, X-ray-based, 3D conformal radiation therapy, and SBRT, respectively. A third of the respondents did not have any experience of spine SBRT; those with high-volume practice were predominantly from an academic institute. The majority of respondents would use spine SBRT to reduce pain severity (71.9%) and achieve durable pain control (61.01%) in the setting of oligometastases (92.73%) and reirradiation (56.69%). Respondents preferred 3- to 5-fraction regimens (64.9%) over 1-2 fractions (33.68%). The top three reasons for not using spine SBRT were resource constraints (50%), lack of machine (37.11%), and lack of training (27.34%). CONCLUSION There is heterogeneity in spine SBRT practice and utilization between academic and nonacademic institutes. Resource and infrastructure constraints along with lack of training are limiting the use of SBRT among ROs from LMICs. Collaborative studies from LMICs will help in resolving unique challenges posed by resource constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anil Tibdewal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Katherine Wakeham
- Applied Radiation Biology and Radiotherapy Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kamal Akbarov
- Applied Radiation Biology and Radiotherapy Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lisbeth Cordero
- Applied Radiation Biology and Radiotherapy Section, Division of Human Health, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Jai Prakash Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India,Jai Prakash Agarwal, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, 1131, Homi Bhabha Block, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India 400012; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Behroozian T, Navarro I, Hoskin P, Johnstone C, Recht A, Menten J, Oldenburger E, van der Linden Y, van der Velden JM, Nguyen QN, Simone CB, Johnstone P, Lutz S, Milton L, Andratschke N, Willmann J, Kazmierska J, Spałek M, Chow E, Raman S. Update on the systematic review/meta-analysis of uncomplicated bone metastases treated with external beam radiation. Radiother Oncol 2022; 174:109-110. [PMID: 35850265 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Behroozian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Inmaculada Navarro
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Candice Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Abram Recht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Johan Menten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, B3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eva Oldenburger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, B3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yvette van der Linden
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joanne M van der Velden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Johnstone
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Stephen Lutz
- Eastern Woods Radiation Oncology, Blanchard Valley Health Organization, Findlay, OH, USA
| | - Lauren Milton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joanna Kazmierska
- Radiotherapy Department II, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Mateusz Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Edward Chow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
van der Velden J, Willmann J, Spałek M, Oldenburger E, Brown S, Kazmierska J, Andratschke N, Menten J, van der Linden Y, Hoskin P. ESTRO ACROP guidelines for external beam radiotherapy of patients with uncomplicated bone metastases. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:197-206. [PMID: 35661676 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
After liver and lungs, bone is the third most common metastatic site (Nystrom et al., 1977). Almost all malignancies can metastasize to the skeleton but 80% of bone metastases originate from breast, prostate, lung, kidney and thyroid cancer (Mundy, 2002). Introduction of effective systemic treatment in many cancers has prolonged patients' survival, including those with bone metastases. Bone metastases may significantly reduce quality of life due to related symptoms and possible complications, such as pain and neurologic compromise. The most serious complications of bone metastases are skeletal-related events (SRE), defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, pain, or other symptoms requiring an urgent intervention such as surgery or radiotherapy. In turn, growing access to modern diagnostic tools allows early detection of asymptomatic bone metastases that could be successfully managed with local treatment avoiding development of SRE. The treatment for bone metastases should focus on relieving existing symptoms and preventing new ones. Radiotherapy is the standard of care for patients with symptomatic bone metastases, providing durable pain relief with minimal toxicity and reasonable cost-effectiveness. Historically, the dose was prescribed in one to five fractions and delivered using simple planning techniques. While 3D-conformal radiotherapy is still widely used for treating bone metastases, introduction of highlyconformal radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have opened new therapeutic possibilities that should be considered in selected patients with bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne van der Velden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, Netherlands
| | - Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mateusz Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Eva Oldenburger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, B3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stephanie Brown
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK and University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Kazmierska
- Radiotherapy Department II, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland; Electroradiology Department, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Johan Menten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, B3000 Leuven, Belgium; Catholic University Leuven, B3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yvette van der Linden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht 3584 CX, Netherlands
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK and University of Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Multidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:76-83. [PMID: 35620018 PMCID: PMC9127274 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence is emerging for new paradigms in the management of non-spine bone metastases. Consensus was feasible amongst physicians in both academic and community-based practice settings. Topics deemed of highest importance for consensus included referral for surgical stabilization and approach to peri-operative radiation, preferred radiation fractionation and appropriate use of stereotactic techniques, and clinical scenarios classified as potentially “complex” warranting multidisciplinary discussion.
Purpose Methods and Materials Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
30
|
Batumalai V, James M. Unwarranted variation in radiation therapy fractionation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:233-241. [PMID: 35243787 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
The adoption of hypofractionation across multiple tumour sites has been slow despite robust evidence. There is considerable unwarranted variation in practice, both within and between jurisdictions. This has been attributed to inconsistencies in guidelines, physician preference, lack of technology and differing financial incentives. Unwarranted variation in the use of hypofractionation has a tremendous effect on cost to both patients and the healthcare system. This places an unnecessary burden on patients and poorly utilises scarce healthcare resources. A collaborative effort from clinicians, patients, healthcare providers and policymakers is needed to reduce unwarranted variation in practice. This will improve quality of care both for patients and at broader healthcare system level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikneswary Batumalai
- Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,GenesisCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melissa James
- Christchurch Oncology Service, Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Centre, Christchurch, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Serratrice N, Faddoul J, Tarabay B, Attieh C, Chalah MA, Ayache SS, Abi Lahoud GN. Ten Years After SINS: Role of Surgery and Radiotherapy in the Management of Patients With Vertebral Metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:802595. [PMID: 35155240 PMCID: PMC8829066 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.802595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of the different types of treatments for a spinal metastasis is to provide the best oncological and functional result with the least aggressive side effects. Initially created in 2010 to help clinicians in the management of vertebral metastases, the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) has quickly found its place in the decision making and the treatment of patients with metastatic spinal disease. Here we conduct a review of the literature describing the different changes that occurred with the SINS score in the last ten years. After a brief presentation of the spinal metastases’ distribution, with or without spinal cord compression, we present the utility of SINS in the radiological diagnosis and extension of the disease, in addition to its limits, especially for scores ranging between 7 and 12. We take this opportunity to expose the latest advances in surgery and radiotherapy concerning spinal metastases, as well as in palliative care and pain control. We also discuss the reliability of SINS amongst radiologists, radiation oncologists, spine surgeons and spine surgery trainees. Finally, we will present the new SINS-derived predictive scores, biomarkers and artificial intelligence algorithms that allow a multidisciplinary approach for the management of spinal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Serratrice
- Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des NeuroSciences (ICVNS) - CMC Bizet, Paris, France
| | - Joe Faddoul
- Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des NeuroSciences (ICVNS) - CMC Bizet, Paris, France.,Department of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier de la Côte Basque, Bayonne, France
| | - Bilal Tarabay
- Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des NeuroSciences (ICVNS) - CMC Bizet, Paris, France
| | - Christian Attieh
- Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des NeuroSciences (ICVNS) - CMC Bizet, Paris, France
| | - Moussa A Chalah
- Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des NeuroSciences (ICVNS) - CMC Bizet, Paris, France.,Univ Paris Est Créteil, Excitabilité Nerveuse et Thérapeutique (ENT), EA 4391, Créteil, France
| | - Samar S Ayache
- Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des NeuroSciences (ICVNS) - CMC Bizet, Paris, France.,Univ Paris Est Créteil, Excitabilité Nerveuse et Thérapeutique (ENT), EA 4391, Créteil, France.,Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Henri Mondor University Hospital, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, DMU FIxIT, Créteil, France
| | - Georges N Abi Lahoud
- Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale et des NeuroSciences (ICVNS) - CMC Bizet, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ellsworth BL, Metz AK, Mott NM, Kazemi R, Stover M, Hughes T, Dossett LA. Review of Cancer-Specific Quality Measures Promoting the Avoidance of Low-Value Care. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3750-3762. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11303-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
33
|
Mathis NJ, Doyle CJ, Rosen DB, Wijetunga NA, Vaynrub M, Bartelstein M, Guttmann DM, Brennan VS, Yamada YJ, Gillespie EF, Yerramilli D, Yang JT. Personalized Treatment Selection Leads to Low Rates of Local Salvage Therapy for Bone Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:99-105. [PMID: 34715255 PMCID: PMC9396633 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Local therapy for patients with nonspine bone metastases is evolving, with data supporting the use of single-fraction treatments, and more recently, showing possible benefit from stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, the rate of local salvage therapy (LST) after each technique has not been characterized in real-world clinic settings where patients are selected at physician discretion. We examined rates of LST in patients with nonspine bone metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed records of RT for nonspine bone metastases at our institution from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. We defined LST as the first occurrence of RT or surgery for oncologic progression to a bone metastasis after initial RT. Cumulative incidence functions for retreatment were generated. We conducted multivariate analysis to identify variables associated with LST. RESULTS A total of 1754 patients were analyzed, with median follow-up of 16.2 months (range, 0-36.8 months). Of all episodes of RT, 51.5% were multifraction external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), 7.0% were single-fraction EBRT, and 41.4% were SBRT. Altogether, 88 patients (5.0%) required LST, with an incidence at 6 months of 2.5%. Incidence of LST at 6 months was 2.1% for SBRT, 5.3% for single-fraction conventional regimens, and 2.4% for multifraction conventional regimens (P = .26). Patients of younger age, who had a higher Karnofsky performance status, and/or who had lesions in the pelvis had a higher risk of retreatment. CONCLUSIONS In this large institutional cohort, the rate of LST was low, with no difference between RT techniques. The findings indicated that SBRT for patients at high risk for treatment failure may reduce the rate of retreatment overall. When treatment modality was selected based on patient characteristics, rates of LST were lower than when treatment was randomly selected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah J. Mathis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Connor J. Doyle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel B. Rosen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Neil A. Wijetunga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Max Vaynrub
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Meredith Bartelstein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - David M Guttmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Victoria S Brennan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yoshiya J Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Divya Yerramilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan T Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
The Effect of Breast Cancer Subtype on Symptom Improvement Following Palliative Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:267-273. [PMID: 34690008 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the relationship between breast cancer subtypes and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prospectively collected PRO for all breast cancer patients treated with palliative, bone metastasis-directed radiotherapy from 2013 to 2016 in the province of British Columbia were analysed. The PRO questionnaire scored pain severity, level of function and symptom frustration at baseline and at 3-4 weeks following palliative radiotherapy using a 12-point scale. The primary outcome was the rate of overall response (any improvement in score); the secondary outcome was the rate of complete improvement in PRO (final PRO score of 0). Multivariate logistic analysis was used to compare response rates between molecular subgroup approximations of luminal A (LumA), luminal B (LumB), HER2-enriched (HER2) and triple negative (TN), as defined by grade and immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS There were 376 patients who underwent 464 courses of palliative radiation for bone metastases. Subtypes included: 243 LumA, 146 LumB, 46 HER2 and 29 TN. There were 216 multifraction radiotherapy courses (median dose 20 Gy) and 248 single-fraction radiotherapy courses (median dose 8 Gy). The overall response rate was 85% and the complete response rate was 25%. In comparison with LumA breast cancers, TN breast cancers were associated with a lower rate of overall response (69% versus 86%, P = 0.021) and a lower rate of complete response (10% versus 28.8%, P = 0.045) on multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION Patients with TN breast cancer have lower rates of pain, function and symptom frustration improvement following palliative radiation for bone metastases.
Collapse
|
35
|
Marshall D, Aldridge MD, Dharmarajan K. Retrospective analysis of characteristics associated with higher-value radiotherapy episodes of care for bone metastases in Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e049009. [PMID: 34667003 PMCID: PMC8527129 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' newly enacted Radiation Oncology Model ('RO Model') was designed to test the cost-saving potential of prospective episode-based payments for radiation treatment for 17 cancer diagnoses by encouraging high-value care and more efficient care delivery. For bone metastases, evidence supports the use of higher-value, shorter courses of radiation (≤10 fractions). Our goal was to determine the prevalence of short radiation courses (≤10 fractions) for bone metastases and the setting, treatment and patient characteristics associated with such courses and their expenditures. DESIGN Using the RO Model episode file, we evaluated receipt of ≤10 fractions of radiotherapy for bone metastases and expenditures by treatment setting for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries during calendar years 2015-2017.Using unadjusted and adjusted regression models, we determined predictors of receipt of ≤10 fractions and expenditures. Multivariable models adjusted for treatment and patient characteristics. RESULTS There were 48 810 episodes for bone metastases during the period. A majority of episodes for ≤10 fractions occurred in hospital-outpatient settings (62.8% (N=22 715)). After adjusting for treatment and patient factors, hospital-outpatient treatment setting remained a significant predictor of receiving ≤10 fractions (adjusted OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.95, 2.12; p<0.001) vs free-standing). The greatest adjusted contributors to total expenditures were number of fractions (US$-3424 (95% CI US$-3412 to US$-3435) for ≤10 fractions vs >10; p<0.001) and treatment type (including US$7716 (95% CI US$7424 to US$8018) for intensity modulated radiation therapy vs conventional external beam; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS A measurable performance gap exists for delivery of higher-value bone metastases radiotherapy under an episode-based model, associated with increased expenditures. The RO Model may succeed in improving the value of bone metastases radiation. Increasing the capacity of free-standing centres to implement palliative-focused services may improve the ability of these practices to succeed under the RO Model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Marshall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Melissa D Aldridge
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kavita Dharmarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bilani N, Yaghi M, Main O, Naik M, Jabbal I, Rivera C, Elson L, Liang H, Saravia D, Nahleh Z. Metastasectomy versus radiation of secondary sites in stage IV breast cancer: Analysis from a national cancer registry. Breast 2021; 60:185-191. [PMID: 34673385 PMCID: PMC8529550 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Locoregional therapy at primary or secondary sites in breast cancer may be associated with improved survival as compared to systemic therapy alone. We explored the sociodemographic and clinicopathologic factors associated with the use of radiation versus surgical resection of metastatic sites (metastasectomy) in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, followed by the associated overall survival. METHODS We sampled the National Cancer Database for patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, (2010-2017) and described cohort's characteristics using univariate analyses. We identified 5 subgroups based on malignant site involvement: 1. Bone only, 2. Brain only, 3. Liver only, 4. Lung only, and 5. Metastasis involving >1 site. Kaplan-Meier modeling with log-rank testing and multivariate Cox Regression analysis were used to explore differences in overall survival between those that received radiation at secondary sites and those that underwent metastasectomy. RESULTS N = 22,749patients were included in this analysis. Radiation (81.2%) was used more commonly than metastasectomy (28.8%). Metastasectomy was associated with better median overall survival across all 5 cohorts (p < .001), with the survival benefit being the most pronounced with lung only (OS: 56.9 months; HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, p = .032), or liver only (OS: 41.6 months; HR: 0.9; 95% CI: 0.7-1.1, p < .001) metastasis. CONCLUSION Metastasectomy in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer may be associated with improved overall survival as compared to radiation of secondary lesions, particularly in those with only liver or lung involvement. Prospective randomized controlled trials investigating surgical resection of metastatic sites in patients with breast cancer are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadeem Bilani
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, USA; Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside and West, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Marita Yaghi
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, USA.
| | - Olivia Main
- Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, USA
| | - Mihir Naik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, USA.
| | - Iktej Jabbal
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, USA.
| | - Carlos Rivera
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, USA.
| | - Leah Elson
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, USA.
| | - Hong Liang
- Department of Clinical Research, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
| | - Diana Saravia
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, USA.
| | - Zeina Nahleh
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ignat P, Todor N, Ignat RM, Șuteu O. Prognostic Factors Influencing Survival and a Treatment Pattern Analysis of Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy for Patients with Bone Metastases. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3876-3890. [PMID: 34677249 PMCID: PMC8534390 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment indication for bone metastases is influenced by patient prognosis. Single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) was proven equally effective as multiple fractionation regimens (MFRT) but continues to be underused. OBJECTIVE Primary objectives: (a) to identify prognostic factors for overall survival and (b) to analyze treatment patterns of palliative radiotherapy (proportion of SFRT indication and predictive factors of radiotherapy regimen) for bone metastases. METHODS 582 patients with bone metastases who underwent conventional radiotherapy between January 1st 2014-31 December 2017 were analyzed. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors of overall survival. For the treatment pattern analysis, 677 radiotherapy courses were evaluated. The logistic regression model was used to identify potential predictors of radiotherapy regimen. RESULTS The 3-year overall survival was 15%. Prognostic factors associated with poor overall survival were multiple bone metastases [hazard ratio (HR = 5.4)], poor performance status (HR = 1.5) and brain metastases (HR = 1.37). SFRT prescription increased from 41% in 2017 to 51% in 2017. Predictors of SFRT prescription were a poor performance status [odds ratio (OR = 0.55)], lung (OR = 0.49) and urologic primaries (OR = 0.33) and the half-body lower site of irradiation (OR = 0.59). Spinal metastases were more likely to receive MFRT (OR = 2.09). CONCLUSIONS Based on the prognostic factors we identified, a selection protocol for patients candidates for palliative radiotherapy to bone metastases could be established, in order to further increase SFRT prescription in our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Ignat
- Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (P.I.); (O.Ș.)
- Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță Oncology Institute, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Nicolae Todor
- Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță Oncology Institute, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Radu-Mihai Ignat
- Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (P.I.); (O.Ș.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Ofelia Șuteu
- Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (P.I.); (O.Ș.)
- Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuță Oncology Institute, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Haaser T, Constantinides Y, Huguet F, De Crevoisier R, Dejean C, Escande A, Ghannam Y, Lahmi L, Le Tallec P, Lecouillard I, Lorchel F, Thureau S, Lagrange JL. [Ethical stakes in palliative care in radiation oncology]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:699-706. [PMID: 34400087 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In 2021, the Ethics Commission of the SFRO has chosen the issue of the practice of palliative care in radiotherapy oncology. Radiation oncology plays a central role in the care of patients with cancer in palliative phase. But behind the broad name of palliative radiotherapy, we actually find a large variety of situations involving diverse ethical issues. Radiation oncologists have the delicate task to take into account multiple factors throughout a complex decision-making process. While the question of the therapeutic indication and the technical choice allowing it to be implemented remains central, reflection cannot be limited to these decision-making and technical aspects alone. It is also a question of being able to create the conditions for a singularity focused care and to build an authentic care relationship, beyond technicity. It is through this daily ethical work, in close collaboration with patients, and under essential conditions of multidisciplinarity and multiprofessionalism, that our fundamental role as caregiver can be deployed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Haaser
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, avenue Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France.
| | - Y Constantinides
- Espace Éthique Ile de France, Paris Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine UMR_S 938, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - R De Crevoisier
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - C Dejean
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Unité de Physique Médicale, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - A Escande
- Service universitaire d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Centre Oscar Lambret, Faculté de médecine Henri Warembourg, Laboratoire CRIStAL, UMR9189, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Y Ghannam
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine UMR_S 938, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - L Lahmi
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine UMR_S 938, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - P Le Tallec
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Quantis Litis EA 4108, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - I Lecouillard
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - F Lorchel
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France; Centre d'Oncologie Radiothérapie et Oncologie de Mâcon - ORLAM, Mâcon, France
| | - S Thureau
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Quantis Litis EA 4108, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - J L Lagrange
- Université Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pituskin E, Fairchild A. Prostate Cancer with Bone Metastases: Addressing Chronic Pain from the Perspective of the Radiation Oncology Nurse Practitioner. Semin Oncol Nurs 2021; 37:151175. [PMID: 34304921 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To discuss the symptom burden experienced among patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases and the role of the oncology nurse practitioner in evaluation for palliative radiotherapy. DATA SOURCES These include PubMed, international consensus documents, and clinician experience. CONCLUSION Men with advanced prostate cancer may live for several years after diagnosis of bone metastases; however, pain and other difficult symptoms are problematic. Pain is effectively treated with palliative radiotherapy, but careful assessment and intervention of other difficult symptoms must be addressed over time. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurse practitioners in radiation oncology should be well-versed in the disease trajectory of this patient population. Careful symptom inquiry and comprehensive physical examination is a key responsibility. Palliative radiotherapy, alongside analgesics and supportive care measures, can effectively reduce symptoms and improve quality of life in men with prostate cancer metastatic to bone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edith Pituskin
- Associate Professor, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alb, Canada.
| | - Alysa Fairchild
- Associate Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alb, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ong WL, Milne RL, Foroudi F, Millar JL. Changing pattern of radiation therapy for bone metastases in an Australian population-based cohort of men with prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:e7-e15. [PMID: 34366292 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate the pattern of use of single-fraction conformal radiation therapy (SF-RT) and advanced radiation therapy techniques (ART), including stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), for management of bone metastases (BM) in a population-based cohort of Australian men with prostate cancer (PCa) PATIENT AND METHODS: We reviewed men with metastatic PCa who received RT for BM between 2012 and 2017 as captured in the statewide Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Data Set (VRMDS). The primary outcomes were: proportion of RT courses using SF-RT and ART. The Cochrane-Armitage test for trend was used to evaluate the changing pattern of SF-RT and ART over time. Multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with the primary outcomes RESULTS: Of the 4,324 courses of palliative RT for BM, 767 (17.7%) were SF-RT, and 615 (14.2%) were ART. There was no evidence of change in SF-RT use over time (P-trend=0.13). In multivariate analyses, increasing age at RT, site of BM (rib, shoulder, pelvis, and extremities), patients' area of residence (regional and remote), and treatment in public and metropolitan centres were associated with increased likelihood of SF-RT use. There was marked increase in ART use from 0.2% in 2012 to 24% in 2017 (11% intensity modulated RT, 13% SBRT) (P-trend<0.001). In multivariate analyses, younger age at RT, site of BM (rib and pelvis), higher socioeconomic status, and treatment in private and metropolitan centres were associated with increased likelihood of ART use. CONCLUSION SF-RT continues to be a clear minority of RT schedules employed in management of BM in PCa, and the adoption of SF-RT use should be encouraged in men with limited prognosis. There has been increasing use of ART, especially SBRT, for BM in PCa over time, and we expect this will continue to increase in the era of metastatic-directed treatment for PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia; Alfred Health Radiation Oncology Services, Australia; School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia.
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia; Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash Health, Monash University, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Australia
| | - Jeremy L Millar
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology Services, Australia; Central Clinical School, Monash University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Chandra RA, Keane FK, Voncken FEM, Thomas CR. Contemporary radiotherapy: present and future. Lancet 2021; 398:171-184. [PMID: 34166607 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00233-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Oncology care is increasingly a multidisciplinary endeavour, and radiation therapy continues to have a key role across the disease spectrum in nearly every cancer. However, the field of radiation oncology is still one of the most poorly understood of the cancer disciplines. In this Review, we attempt to summarise and contextualise developments within the field of radiation oncology for the non-radiation oncologist. We discuss advancements in treatment technologies and imaging, followed by an overview of the interplay with advancements in systemic therapy and surgical techniques. Finally, we review new frontiers in radiation oncology, including advances within the metastatic disease continuum, reirradiation, and emerging types of radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi A Chandra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Florence K Keane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francine E M Voncken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Biswas T, Spratt DE. Dose Escalation for Oligometastatic Disease: Is More Better? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:680-681. [PMID: 34089675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tithi Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Viani GA, Pavoni JF, De Fendi LI. Prophylactic corticosteroid to prevent pain flare in bone metastases treated by radiotherapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:218-225. [PMID: 34211772 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic corticosteroids to prevent pain flare (PF) in bone metastases treated with radiotherapy performing a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT). Materials and methods RCTs were identified on Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of annual meetings through June 2020. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed to assess if corticosteroids reduce the PF, pain progression, and the mean of days with PF compared with the placebo. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Three RCTs with a total of 713 patients treated were included. The corticosteroids reduced the occurrence of early PF 20.5% (51/248) versus 32% (80/250) placebo, OR = 0.55 (95% CI: 0.36-0.82, p = 0.002). The mean days of PF were reduced to 1.6 days (95% CI: 1.3-1.9, p = 0.0001). Prophylactic corticosteroids had more patients with no PF and no pain progression, OR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.14-2.32, p = 0.007). No significant corticosteroids effect was observed for pain progression (p = ns) and late PF occurrence (p = ns). Conclusion Prophylactic corticosteroids reduced the incidence of early PF, the days with PF, resulting in a superior rate of patients with no PF and no pain progression, but with no significant benefit for reducing pain progression or late PF occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Arruda Viani
- Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Juliana Fernandes Pavoni
- Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Ligia Issa De Fendi
- Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Martin-Perez AJ, Fernández-González M, Postigo-Martin P, Sampedro Pilegaard M, Fernández-Lao C, Castro-Martín E, Martín-Martín L, Lozano-Lozano M. Effectiveness of Antalgic Therapies in Patients with Vertebral Bone Metastasis: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18083991. [PMID: 33920146 PMCID: PMC8069127 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
There is no systematic review that has identified existing studies evaluating the pharmacological and non-pharmacological intervention for pain management in patients with bone metastasis. To fill this gap in the literature, this systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different antalgic therapies (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) in the improvement of pain of these patients. To this end, this protocol has been written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020135762). A systematic search will be carried out in four international databases: Medline (Via PubMed), Web of Science, Cochrane Library and SCOPUS, to select the randomized controlled clinical trials. The Risk of Bias Tool developed by Cochrane will be used to assess the risk of bias and the quality of the identified studies. A narrative synthesis will be used to describe and compare the studies, and after the data extraction, random effects model and a subgroup analyses will be performed according to the type of intervention, if possible. This protocol aims to generate a systematic review that compiles and synthesizes the best and most recent evidence on the treatment of pain derived from vertebral metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Jose Martin-Perez
- Department of Internal Medicine, San Cecilio University Hospital, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain;
- Clinical Medicine and Public Health Doctoral Studies, University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain
| | - María Fernández-González
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18010 Granada, Spain;
| | - Paula Postigo-Martin
- Biohealth Research Institute in Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18016 Granada, Spain; (P.P.-M.); (C.F.-L.); (E.C.-M.); (M.L.-L.)
- Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), “Cuídate” Support Unit for Oncology Patients (UAPO-Cuíate), 18010 Granada, Spain
| | - Marc Sampedro Pilegaard
- Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, The Research Unit for User Perspectives and Community-Based Interventions, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark;
- REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Carolina Fernández-Lao
- Biohealth Research Institute in Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18016 Granada, Spain; (P.P.-M.); (C.F.-L.); (E.C.-M.); (M.L.-L.)
- Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), “Cuídate” Support Unit for Oncology Patients (UAPO-Cuíate), 18010 Granada, Spain
| | - Eduardo Castro-Martín
- Biohealth Research Institute in Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18016 Granada, Spain; (P.P.-M.); (C.F.-L.); (E.C.-M.); (M.L.-L.)
- Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), “Cuídate” Support Unit for Oncology Patients (UAPO-Cuíate), 18010 Granada, Spain
| | - Lydia Martín-Martín
- Biohealth Research Institute in Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18016 Granada, Spain; (P.P.-M.); (C.F.-L.); (E.C.-M.); (M.L.-L.)
- Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), “Cuídate” Support Unit for Oncology Patients (UAPO-Cuíate), 18010 Granada, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-958249004
| | - Mario Lozano-Lozano
- Biohealth Research Institute in Granada (ibs.GRANADA), 18016 Granada, Spain; (P.P.-M.); (C.F.-L.); (E.C.-M.); (M.L.-L.)
- Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), “Cuídate” Support Unit for Oncology Patients (UAPO-Cuíate), 18010 Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ong WL, Foroudi F, Milne RL, Millar JL. Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases at the end of life in Victoria. Med J Aust 2021; 214:236-237.e1. [PMID: 33610136 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wee Loon Ong
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC.,University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Jeremy L Millar
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC.,Monash University, Melbourne, VIC
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Nieder C, Haukland EC, Mannsaker B, Yobuta R. Palliative Radiotherapy During the Last Month of Life: Have COVID-19 Recommendations Led to Reduced Utilization? In Vivo 2021; 35:649-652. [PMID: 33402522 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The study aimed to evaluate practice changes in the time period of the early wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a retrospective single institution study. We defined palliative radiotherapy (PRT) initiated before Saturday, March 14th as pre-COVID and PRT initiated later as during-COVID (through June 30th). RESULTS National COVID-19 recommendations led to a significant decrease in PRT with 10 or more fractions, while re-irradiation and radiotherapy during the final 30 days of life were equally common before and after these recommendations had been issued in March 2020. CONCLUSION Rapid adoption of modified PRT regimens was feasible. However, the challenge of overtreatment in the final phase of the disease, due to inaccurate survival prediction, persisted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Nieder
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway; .,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Ellinor C Haukland
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Bard Mannsaker
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway
| | - Rosalba Yobuta
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pfeifle RL, Beasley EM, Crabtree NE, Fraser C, Elbert JA, Ducker E, Nagata K, Garner BC, Sakamoto K. Osteosarcoma in the femur of a horse. EQUINE VET EDUC 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/eve.13445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- R. L. Pfeifle
- Department of Large Animal Medicine University of Georgia Athens GeorgiaUSA
| | - E. M. Beasley
- Department of Large Animal Medicine University of Georgia Athens GeorgiaUSA
| | - N. E. Crabtree
- Department of Large Animal Medicine University of Georgia Athens GeorgiaUSA
| | - C. Fraser
- Department of Pathology University of Georgia Athens GeorgiaUSA
| | - J. A. Elbert
- Department of Pathology University of Georgia Athens GeorgiaUSA
| | - E. Ducker
- Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Diagnostic Imaging University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
| | - K. Nagata
- Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Diagnostic Imaging University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
| | - B. C. Garner
- Department of Pathology University of Georgia Athens GeorgiaUSA
| | - K. Sakamoto
- Department of Pathology University of Georgia Athens GeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Selvaraja VK, Gudipudib DK. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on work routine, practice and mental state of radiation oncologists in India: an online survey. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1165. [PMID: 33680079 PMCID: PMC7929773 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose COVID-19 has affected the lives of every medical professional including oncologists. The goal of this survey was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the work routine, psychological state and radiotherapy practice of radiation oncologists. Materials and methods An anonymous survey consisting of 23 questions regarding the lives of radiation oncologists during the COVID-19 pandemic was distributed online via social media from July 14 to July 21, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 18.0 software and basic descriptive statistics were applied. Results A total of 82 radiation oncologists responded to the survey. The majority were professors (28/82; 34.1%) and residents (28/82; 34.1%) and <50 years old (70/82; 85.4%). Cancer screening programs (57/62; 91.9%) and number of new cases reduced (44/82; 53.7%) in many institutes. Follow-up was still done in-person by 73.2% respondents. 35/82 (42.7%) respondents were satisfied about their safety during COVID-19, at the same time 36/82 (43.9%) were worried about the patient’s safety. The fear of contracting COVID-19 (57/82; 69.5%) and infecting their families (64/82; 78%) was high. Physical presence during case implementation (59/82; 72%) and daily setup verification (60/82; 73.2%) remained the same during COVID-19. Half of the respondents adopted new fractionation schedules, commonly in breast and palliative cases. Time spent on research had reduced by 62.2%. Only 41.4% respondents were satisfied with the patient care provided by them during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion COVID-19 has significantly altered the work routine, radiotherapy practice and mental state of radiation oncologists.
Collapse
|
49
|
Datta NR, Datta S, Samiei M. Strategies to Maximize Available Resources With Minimum Cost Escalation for Improving Radiation Therapy Accessibility in the Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era: An Analysis for Asia. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100565. [PMID: 32995668 PMCID: PMC7513874 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is widespread accord among economists that the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic will have a severe negative effect on the global economy. Establishing new radiation therapy (RT) infrastructure may be significantly compromised in the post-COVID-19 era. Alternative strategies are needed to improve the existing RT accessibility without significant cost escalation. The outcomes of these approaches on RT availability have been examined for Asia. METHODS AND MATERIALS The details of RT infrastructures in 2020 for 51 countries in Asia were obtained from the Directory of Radiotherapy Centers of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Using the International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines, the percent of RT accessibility and the additional requirements of teletherapy (TRT) units were computed for these countries. To maximize the utilization of the existing RT facilities, 5 options were evaluated, namely, hypofractionation RT (HFRT) alone, with/without 25% or 50% additional working hours. The effect of these strategies on the percent of RT access and additional TRT unit requirements to achieve 100% RT access were estimated. RESULTS In 46 countries, 4617 TRT units are available. The mean percent of RT accessibility is 62.4% in 43 countries (TRT units = 4491) where the information on cancer incidence was also available, and these would need an additional 6474 TRT units for achieving 100% RT accessibility. By adopting HFRT alone, increasing the working hours by 25% alone, 25% with HFRT, 50% alone, and 50% with HFRT, the percent of RT access could improve to 74.9%, 78%, 90.5%, 93.7%, and 106.1%, respectively. Correspondingly, the need for additional TRT units would progressively decrease to 4646, 4284, 3073, 2820, and 1958 units. CONCLUSIONS The economic slowdown in the post-COVID-19 period could severely impend establishment of new RT facilities. Thus, maximal utilization of the available RT infrastructure with minimum additional costs could be possible by adopting HFRT with or without increased working hours to improve the RT coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niloy R. Datta
- Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Sneha Datta
- Independent Researcher, London, United Kingdom
| | - Massoud Samiei
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Batumalai V, Descallar J, Delaney G, Gabriel G, Wong K, Shafiq J, Vinod S, Barton M. Patterns of use of palliative radiotherapy fractionation for bone metastases and 30-day mortality. Radiother Oncol 2021; 154:299-305. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|