Experimental assessment of inter-centre variation in stopping-power and range prediction in particle therapy

Technical note: Radiological clinical equivalence for phantom materials in carbon ion therapy

PURPOSE

As carbon ion radiotherapy increases in use, there are limited phantom materials for heterogeneous or anthropomorphic phantom measurements. This work characterized the radiological clinical equivalence of several phantom materials in a therapeutic carbon ion beam.

METHODS

Eight materials were tested for radiological material-equivalence in a carbon ion beam. The materials were computed tomography (CT)-scanned to obtain Hounsfield unit (HU) values, then irradiated in a monoenergetic carbon ion beam to determine relative linear stopping power (RLSP). The corresponding HU and RLSP for each phantom material were compared to clinical carbon ion calibration curves. For absorbed dose comparison, ion chamber measurements were made in the center of a carbon ion spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) in water and in the phantom material, evaluating whether the material perturbed the absorbed dose measurement beyond what was predicted by the HU-RLSP relationship.

RESULTS

Polyethylene, solid water (Gammex and Sun Nuclear), Blue Water (Standard Imaging), and Techtron HPV had measured RLSP values that agreed within ±4.2% of RLSP values predicted by the clinical calibration curve. Measured RLSP for acrylic was 7.2% different from predicted. The agreement for balsa wood and cork varied between samples. Ion chamber measurements in the phantom materials were within 0.1% of ion chamber measurements in water for most materials (solid water, Blue Water, polyethylene, and acrylic), and within 1.9% for the rest of the materials (balsa wood, cork, and Techtron HPV).

CONCLUSIONS

Several phantom materials (Blue Water, polyethylene, solid water [Gammex and Sun Nuclear], and Techtron HPV) are suitable for heterogeneous phantom measurements for carbon ion therapy. Low density materials should be carefully characterized due to inconsistencies between samples.

Benefit of range uncertainty reduction in robust optimisation for proton therapy of brain, head-and-neck and breast cancer patients

Background and Purpose

The primary cause of range uncertainty in proton therapy is inaccuracy in estimating the stopping-power ratio from computed tomography. This study examined the impact on dose-volume metrics by reducing range uncertainty in robust optimisation for a diverse patient cohort and determined the level of range uncertainty that resulted in a relevant reduction in doses to organs-at-risk (OARs).

Materials and Methods

The effect of reducing range uncertainty on OAR doses was evaluated by robustly optimising six proton plans with varying range uncertainty levels (ranging from 3.5% in the original plan to 1.0%), keeping setup uncertainty fixed. All plans used the initial clinical treatment plan's beam directions and optimisation objectives and were optimised until a clinically acceptable plan was achieved across all setup and range scenarios. The effect of reduced range uncertainty on dose-volume metrics for OARs near the target was evaluated. This study included 30 brain cancer patients, as well as five head-and-neck and five breast cancer patients, investigating the relevance of reducing range uncertainty when different setup uncertainties were used.

Results

Lowering range uncertainty slightly reduced the nominal dose to surrounding tissue. For body volume receiving 80% of the prescribed dose, reducing range uncertainty from 3.5% to 2.0% resulted in a median decrease of 4 cm3 for the brain, 17 cm3 for head-and-neck, and 27 cm3 for breast cancer patients.

Conclusions

Reducing range uncertainty in robust optimisation showed a reduction in dose to OARs. The clinical relevance depends on the affected organs and the clinical dose constraints.

Proton CT on biological phantoms for x-ray CT calibration in proton treatment planning

Objective.To present and characterize a novel method for x-ray computed tomography (xCT) calibration in proton treatment planning, based on proton CT (pCT) measurements on biological phantoms.Approach.A pCT apparatus was used to perform direct measurements of 3D stopping power relative to water (SPR) maps on stabilized, biological phantoms. Two single-energy xCT calibration curves-i.e. tissue substitutes and stoichiometric-were compared to pCT data. Moreover, a new calibration method based on these data was proposed, and verified against intra- and inter-species variability, dependence on stabilization, beam-hardening conditions, and analysis procedures.Main results.Biological phantoms were verified to be stable in time, with a dependence on temperature conditions, especially in the fat region: (-2.5 0.5) HU °C-1. The pCT measurements were compared with standard xCT calibrations, revealing an average SPR discrepancy within ±1.60% for both fat and muscle regions. In the bone region the xCT calibrations overestimated the pCT-measured SPR of the phantom, with a maximum discrepancy of about +3%. As a result, a new cross-calibration curve was directly extracted from the pCT data. Overall, the SPR uncertainty margin associated with this curve was below 3%; fluctuations in the uncertainty values were observed across the HU range. Cross-calibration curves obtained with phantoms made of different animal species and anatomical parts were reproducible with SPR discrepancies within 3%. Moreover, the stabilization procedure did not affect the resulting curve within a 2.2% SPR deviation. Finally, the cross-calibration curve was affected by the beam-hardening conditions on xCTs, especially in the bone region, while dependencies below 2% resulted from the image registration procedure.Significance.Our results showed that pCT measurements on biological phantoms may provide an accurate method for the verification of current xCT calibrations and may represent a tool for the implementation of a new calibration method for proton treatment planning.

MRI-only based material mass density and relative stopping power estimation via deep learning for proton therapy: a preliminary study

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in treatment planning due to its superior soft tissue contrast, which is useful for tumor and soft tissue delineation compared to computed tomography (CT). However, MRI cannot directly provide mass density or relative stopping power (RSP) maps, which are required for calculating proton radiotherapy doses. Therefore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into MRI-based treatment planning to estimate mass density and RSP directly from MRI has generated significant interest. A deep learning (DL) based framework was developed to establish a voxel-wise correlation between MR images and mass density as well as RSP. To facilitate the study, five tissue substitute phantoms were created, representing different tissues such as skin, muscle, adipose tissue, 45% hydroxyapatite (HA), and spongiosa bone. The composition of these phantoms was based on information from ICRP reports. Additionally, two animal tissue phantoms, simulating pig brain and liver, were prepared for DL training purposes. The phantom study involved the development of two DL models. The first model utilized clinical T1 and T2 MRI scans as input, while the second model incorporated zero echo time (ZTE) MRI scans. In the patient application study, two more DL models were trained: one using T1 and T2 MRI scans as input, and another model incorporating synthetic dual-energy computed tomography (sDECT) images to provide accurate bone tissue information. The DECT empirical model was used as a reference to evaluate the proposed models in both phantom and patient application studies. The DECT empirical model was selected as the reference for evaluating the proposed models in both phantom and patient application studies. In the phantom study, the DL model based on T1, and T2 MRI scans demonstrated higher accuracy in estimating mass density and RSP for skin, muscle, adipose tissue, brain, and liver. The mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) were 0.42%, 0.14%, 0.19%, 0.78%, and 0.26% for mass density, and 0.30%, 0.11%, 0.16%, 0.61%, and 0.23% for RSP, respectively. The DL model incorporating ZTE MRI further improved the accuracy of mass density and RSP estimation for 45% HA and spongiosa bone, with MAPE values of 0.23% and 0.09% for mass density, and 0.19% and 0.07% for RSP, respectively. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using an MRI-only approach combined with DL methods for mass density and RSP estimation in proton therapy treatment planning. By employing this approach, it is possible to obtain the necessary information for proton radiotherapy directly from MRI scans, eliminating the need for additional imaging modalities.

First clinical experience following the consensus guide for calibrating a proton stopping power ratio curve in a new proton centre

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This work introduces the first assessment of CT calibration following the ESTRO's consensus guidelines and validating the HLUT through the irradiation of biological material.

METHODS

Two electron density phantoms were scanned with two CT scanners using two CT scan energies. The stopping power ratio (SPR) and mass density (MD) HLUTs for different CT scan energies were derived using Schneider's and ESTRO's methods. The comparison metric in this work is based on the Water-Equivalent Thickness (WET) difference between the treatment planning system and biological irradiation measurement. The SPR HLUTs were compared between the two calibration methods. To assess the accuracy of using MD HLUT for dose calculation in the treatment planning system, MD vs SPR HLUT was compared. Lastly, the feasibility of using a single SPR HLUT to replace two different energy CT scans was explored.

RESULTS

The results show a WET difference of less than 3.5% except for the result in the Bone region between Schneider's and ESTRO's methods. Comparing MD and SPR HLUT, the results from MD HLUT show less than a 3.5% difference except for the Bone region. However, the SPR HLUT shows a lower mean absolute percentage difference as compared to MD HLUT between the measured and calculated WET difference. Lastly, it is possible to use a single SPR HLUT for two different CT scan energies since both WET differences are within 3.5%.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report on calibrating an HLUT following the ESTRO's guidelines. While our result shows incremental improvement in range uncertainty using the ESTRO's guideline, the prescriptional approach of the guideline does promote harmonization of CT calibration protocols between different centres.

CT number calibration audit in photon radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

Inadequate computed tomography (CT) number calibration curves affect dose calculation accuracy. Although CT number calibration curves registered in treatment planning systems (TPSs) should be consistent with human tissues, it is unclear whether adequate CT number calibration is performed because CT number calibration curves have not been assessed for various types of CT number calibration phantoms and TPSs.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate CT number calibration curves for mass density (ρ) and relative electron density (ρe ).

METHODS

A CT number calibration audit phantom was sent to 24 Japanese photon therapy institutes from the evaluating institute and scanned using their individual clinical CT scan protocols. The CT images of the audit phantom and institute-specific CT number calibration curves were submitted to the evaluating institute for analyzing the calibration curves registered in the TPSs at the participating institutes. The institute-specific CT number calibration curves were created using commercial phantom (Gammex, Gammex Inc., Middleton, WI, USA) or CIRS phantom (Computerized Imaging Reference Systems, Inc., Norfolk, VA, USA)). At the evaluating institute, theoretical CT number calibration curves were created using a stoichiometric CT number calibration method based on the CT image, and the institute-specific CT number calibration curves were compared with the theoretical calibration curve. Differences in ρ and ρe over the multiple points on the curve (Δρm and Δρe,m , respectively) were calculated for each CT number, categorized for each phantom vendor and TPS, and evaluated for three tissue types: lung, soft tissues, and bones. In particular, the CT-ρ calibration curves for Tomotherapy TPSs (ACCURAY, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) were categorized separately from the Gammex CT-ρ calibration curves because the available tissue-equivalent materials (TEMs) were limited by the manufacturer recommendations. In addition, the differences in ρ and ρe for the specific TEMs (ΔρTEM and Δρe,TEM , respectively) were calculated by subtracting the ρ or ρe of the TEMs from the theoretical CT-ρ or CT-ρe calibration curve.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of Δρm and Δρe,m for the Gammex phantom were -1.1 ± 1.2 g/cm3 and -0.2 ± 1.1, -0.3 ± 0.9 g/cm3 and 0.8 ± 1.3, and -0.9 ± 1.3 g/cm3 and 1.0 ± 1.5 for lung, soft tissues, and bones, respectively. The mean ± SD of Δρm and Δρe,m for the CIRS phantom were 0.3 ± 0.8 g/cm3 and 0.9 ± 0.9, 0.6 ± 0.6 g/cm3 and 1.4 ± 0.8, and 0.2 ± 0.5 g/cm3 and 1.6 ± 0.5 for lung, soft tissues, and bones, respectively. The mean ± SD of Δρm for Tomotherapy TPSs was 2.1 ± 1.4 g/cm3 for soft tissues, which is larger than those for other TPSs. The mean ± SD of Δρe,TEM for the Gammex brain phantom (BRN-SR2) was -1.8 ± 0.4, implying that the tissue equivalency of the BRN-SR2 plug was slightly inferior to that of other plugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Latent deviations between human tissues and TEMs were found by comparing the CT number calibration curves of the various institutes.

Commissioning and Validation of CT Number to SPR Calibration in Carbon Ion Therapy Facility

Purpose

We performed computed tomography (CT)-stopping power ratio (SPR) calibration in a carbon-ion therapy facility and evaluated SPR estimation accuracy.

Materials and Methods

A polybinary tissue model method was used for the calibration of CT numbers and SPR. As a verification by dose calculation, we created a virtual phantom to which the CT-SPR calibration table was applied. Then, SPR was calculated from the change in the range of the treatment planning beam when changing to 19 different CT numbers, and the accuracy of the treatment planning system (TPS) calculation of SPR values from the CT-SPR calibration table was validated. As a verification by measurement, 5 materials (water, milk, olive oil, ethanol, 40% K2HPO4) were placed in a container, and the SPR was obtained by measurement from the change in the range of the beam that passed through the materials.

Results

The results of the dose calculations of the TPS showed that the results agreed within 1% for the lower CT numbers up to 1000 HU, but there was a difference of 3.0% in the higher CT number volume. The difference between the SPR calculated by TPS and the SPR caused by the difference in the energy of the incident particles agreed within 0.51%. The accuracy of SPR estimation was measured, and the error was within 2% for all materials tested.

Conclusion

These results indicate that the SPR estimation errors are within the range of errors that can be expected in particle therapy. From commissioning and verification results, the CT-SPR calibration table obtained during this commissioning process is clinically applicable.

Prediction of proton stopping power ratios using dual-energy CT basis material decomposition

BACKGROUND

Proton radiotherapy treatment plans are currently restricted by the range uncertainties originating from the stopping power ratio (SPR) prediction based on single-energy computed tomography (SECT). Various studies have shown that multi-energy CT (MECT) can reduce the range uncertainties due to medical implant materials and age-related variations in tissue composition. None of these has directly applied the basis material density (MD) images produced by projection-based MECT systems for SPR prediction.

PURPOSE

To present and evaluate a novel proton SPR prediction method based on MD images from dual-energy CT (DECT), which could reduce the range uncertainties currently associated with proton radiotherapy.

METHODS

A theoretical basis material decomposition into water and iodine material densities was performed for various pediatric and adult human reference tissues, as well as other non-tissue materials, by minimizing the root-mean-square relative attenuation error in the energy interval from 40 to 140 keV. A model (here called MD-SPR) mapping predicted MDs to theoretically calculated reference SPRs was created with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) data-fitting. The goodness of fit of the MD-SPR model was evaluated for the included reference tissues. MD images of two electron density phantoms, combined to form a head- and an abdomen-sized phantom setup, were acquired with a clinical projection-based fast-kV switching DECT scanner. The MD images were compared to the theoretically predicted MDs of the tissue surrogates and other non-tissue materials in the phantoms, as well as used for input to the MD-SPR model for generation of SPR images. The SPR images were subsequently compared to theoretical reference SPRs of the materials in the phantoms, as well as to SPR images from a commercial algorithm (DirectSPR, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) using image-based consecutive scan DECT for the same phantom setups.

RESULTS

The predicted SPRs of the tissue surrogates were similar for MD-SPR and DirectSPR, where the adipose and bone tissue surrogates were within 1% difference to the reference SPRs, while other non-adipose soft tissue surrogates (breast, brain, liver, muscle) were all underestimated by between -0.7% and -1.8%. The SPRs of the non-tissue materials (polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), graphite and Teflon) were within 2.8% for MD-SPR images, compared to 6.8% for DirectSPR.

CONCLUSIONS

The MD-SPR model performed similar compared to other published methods for the human reference tissues. The SPR prediction for tissue surrogates was similar to DirectSPR and showed potential to improve SPR prediction for non-tissue materials.

Single energy CT-based mass density and relative stopping power estimation for proton therapy using deep learning method

Background

The number of patients undergoing proton therapy has increased in recent years. Current treatment planning systems (TPS) calculate dose maps using three-dimensional (3D) maps of relative stopping power (RSP) and mass density. The patient-specific maps of RSP and mass density were obtained by translating the CT number (HU) acquired using single-energy computed tomography (SECT) with appropriate conversions and coefficients. The proton dose calculation uncertainty of this approach is 2.5%-3.5% plus 1 mm margin. SECT is the major clinical modality for proton therapy treatment planning. It would be intriguing to enhance proton dose calculation accuracy using a deep learning (DL) approach centered on SECT.

Objectives

The purpose of this work is to develop a deep learning method to generate mass density and relative stopping power (RSP) maps based on clinical single-energy CT (SECT) data for proton dose calculation in proton therapy treatment.

Methods

Artificial neural networks (ANN), fully convolutional neural networks (FCNN), and residual neural networks (ResNet) were used to learn the correlation between voxel-specific mass density, RSP, and SECT CT number (HU). A stoichiometric calibration method based on SECT data and an empirical model based on dual-energy CT (DECT) images were chosen as reference models to evaluate the performance of deep learning neural networks. SECT images of a CIRS 062M electron density phantom were used as the training dataset for deep learning models. CIRS anthropomorphic M701 and M702 phantoms were used to test the performance of deep learning models.

Results

For M701, the mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of the mass density map by FCNN are 0.39%, 0.92%, 0.68%, 0.92%, and 1.57% on the brain, spinal cord, soft tissue, bone, and lung, respectively, whereas with the SECT stoichiometric method, they are 0.99%, 2.34%, 1.87%, 2.90%, and 12.96%. For RSP maps, the MAPE of FCNN on M701 are 0.85%, 2.32%, 0.75%, 1.22%, and 1.25%, whereas with the SECT reference model, they are 0.95%, 2.61%, 2.08%, 7.74%, and 8.62%.

Conclusion

The results show that deep learning neural networks have the potential to generate accurate voxel-specific material property information, which can be used to improve the accuracy of proton dose calculation.

Advances in knowledge

Deep learning-based frameworks are proposed to estimate material mass density and RSP from SECT with improved accuracy compared with conventional methods.

Consensus guide on CT-based prediction of stopping-power ratio using a Hounsfield look-up table for proton therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Studies have shown large variations in stopping-power ratio (SPR) prediction from computed tomography (CT) across European proton centres. To standardise this process, a step-by-step guide on specifying a Hounsfield look-up table (HLUT) is presented here.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The HLUT specification process is divided into six steps: Phantom setup, CT acquisition, CT number extraction, SPR determination, HLUT specification, and HLUT validation. Appropriate CT phantoms have a head- and body-sized part, with tissue-equivalent inserts in regard to X-ray and proton interactions. CT numbers are extracted from a region-of-interest covering the inner 70% of each insert in-plane and several axial CT slices in scan direction. For optimal HLUT specification, the SPR of phantom inserts is measured in a proton beam and the SPR of tabulated human tissues is computed stoichiometrically at 100 MeV. Including both phantom inserts and tabulated human tissues increases HLUT stability. Piecewise linear regressions are performed between CT numbers and SPRs for four tissue groups (lung, adipose, soft tissue, and bone) and then connected with straight lines. Finally, a thorough but simple validation is performed.

RESULTS

The best practices and individual challenges are explained comprehensively for each step. A well-defined strategy for specifying the connection points between the individual line segments of the HLUT is presented. The guide was tested exemplarily on three CT scanners from different vendors, proving its feasibility.

CONCLUSION

The presented step-by-step guide for CT-based HLUT specification with recommendations and examples can contribute to reduce inter-centre variations in SPR prediction.

Potential margin reduction in prostate cancer proton therapy with prompt gamma imaging for online treatment verification

The potential of proton therapy is currently limited due to large safety margins. We estimated the potential reduction of clinical margins when using prompt gamma imaging (PGI) for online treatment verification of prostate cancer. For two adaptive scenarios a potential reduction relative to clinical practice was evaluated. The use of a trolley-mounted PGI system for online treatment verification to trigger an adaptation reduced the current range margins from 7 mm to 3 mm. In a case example, the dose reduction due to reduced range margins was substantially larger compared to reduced setup margins when using pre-treatment volumetric imaging.

Dual- and multi-energy CT for particle stopping-power estimation: current state, challenges and potential

Range uncertainty has been a key factor preventing particle radiotherapy from reaching its full physical potential. One of the main contributing sources is the uncertainty in estimating particle stopping power (ρ_s) within patients. Currently, theρ_sdistribution in a patient is derived from a single-energy CT (SECT) scan acquired for treatment planning by converting CT number expressed in Hounsfield units (HU) of each voxel toρ_susing a Hounsfield look-up table (HLUT), also known as the CT calibration curve. HU andρ_sshare a linear relationship with electron density but differ in their additional dependence on elemental composition through different physical properties, i.e. effective atomic number and mean excitation energy, respectively. Because of that, the HLUT approach is particularly sensitive to differences in elemental composition between real human tissues and tissue surrogates as well as tissue variations within and among individual patients. The use of dual-energy CT (DECT) forρ_sprediction has been shown to be effective in reducing the uncertainty inρ_sestimation compared to SECT. The acquisition of CT data over different x-ray spectra yields additional information on the material elemental composition. Recently, multi-energy CT (MECT) has been explored to deduct material-specific information with higher dimensionality, which has the potential to further improve the accuracy ofρ_sestimation. Even though various DECT and MECT methods have been proposed and evaluated over the years, these approaches are still only scarcely implemented in routine clinical practice. In this topical review, we aim at accelerating this translation process by providing: (1) a comprehensive review of the existing DECT/MECT methods forρ_sestimation with their respective strengths and weaknesses; (2) a general review of uncertainties associated with DECT/MECT methods; (3) a general review of different aspects related to clinical implementation of DECT/MECT methods; (4) other potential advanced DECT/MECT applications beyondρ_sestimation.

Possibilities and challenges when using synthetic computed tomography in an adaptive carbon-ion treatment workflow

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Anatomical surveillance during ion-beam therapy is the basis for an effective tumor treatment and optimal organ at risk (OAR) sparing. Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can replace the X-ray based planning CT (X-rayCT) in photon radiotherapy and improve the workflow efficiency without additional imaging dose. The extension to carbon-ion radiotherapy is highly challenging; complex patient positioning, unique anatomical situations, distinct horizontal and vertical beam incidence directions, and limited training data are only few problems. This study gives insight into the possibilities and challenges of using sCTs in carbon-ion therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For head and neck patients immobilised with thermoplastic masks 30 clinically applied actively scanned carbon-ion treatment plans on 15 CTs comprising 60 beams were analyzed. Those treatment plans were re-calculated on MRI based sCTs which were created employing a 3D U-Net. Dose differences and carbon-ion spot displacements between sCT and X-rayCT were evaluated on a patient specific basis.

RESULTS

Spot displacement analysis showed a peak displacement by 0.2 cm caused by the immobilisation mask not measurable with the MRI. 95.7% of all spot displacements were located within 1 cm. For the clinical target volume (CTV) the median D_50% agreed within -0.2% (-1.3 to 1.4%), while the median D_0.01cc differed up to 4.2% (-1.3 to 25.3%) comparing the dose distribution on the X-rayCT and the sCT. OAR deviations depended strongly on the position and the dose gradient. For three patients no deterioration of the OAR parameters was observed. Other patients showed large deteriorations, e.g. for one patient D_2% of the chiasm differed by 28.1%.

CONCLUSION

The usage of sCTs opens several new questions, concluding that we are not ready yet for an MR-only workflow in carbon-ion therapy, as envisaged in photon therapy. Although omitting the X-rayCT seems unfavourable in the case of carbon-ion therapy, an sCT could be advantageous for monitoring, re-planning, and adaptation.

Potential of a Second-Generation Dual-Layer Spectral CT for Dose Calculation in Particle Therapy Treatment Planning

In particle therapy treatment planning, dose calculation is conducted using patient-specific maps of tissue ion stopping power ratio (SPR) to predict beam ranges. Improving patient-specific SPR prediction is therefore essential for accurate dose calculation. In this study, we investigated the use of the Spectral CT 7500, a second-generation dual-layer spectral computed tomography (DLCT) system, as an alternative to conventional single-energy CT (SECT) for patient-specific SPR prediction. This dual-energy CT (DECT)-based method allows for the direct prediction of SPR from quantitative measurements of relative electron density and effective atomic number using the Bethe equation, whereas the conventional SECT-based method consists of indirect image data-based prediction through the conversion of calibrated CT numbers to SPR. The performance of the Spectral CT 7500 in particle therapy treatment planning was characterized by conducting a thorough analysis of its SPR prediction accuracy for both tissue-equivalent materials and common non-tissue implant materials. In both instances, DLCT was found to reduce uncertainty in SPR predictions compared to SECT. Mean deviations of 0.7% and 1.6% from measured SPR values were found for DLCT- and SECT-based predictions, respectively, in tissue-equivalent materials. Furthermore, end-to-end analyses of DLCT-based treatment planning were performed for proton, helium, and carbon ion therapies with anthropomorphic head and pelvic phantoms. 3D gamma analysis was performed with ionization chamber array measurements as the reference. DLCT-predicted dose distributions revealed higher passing rates compared to SECT-predicted dose distributions. In the DLCT-based treatment plans, measured distal-edge evaluation layers were within 1 mm of their predicted positions, demonstrating the accuracy of DLCT-based particle range prediction. This study demonstrated that the use of the Spectral CT 7500 in particle therapy treatment planning may lead to better agreement between planned and delivered dose compared to current clinical SECT systems.

Dual-layer spectral CT for proton, helium, and carbon ion beam therapy planning of brain tumors

Pretreatment computed tomography (CT) imaging is an essential component of the particle therapy treatment planning chain. Treatment planning and optimization with charged particles require accurate and precise estimations of ion beam range in tissues, characterized by the stopping power ratio (SPR). Reduction of range uncertainties arising from conventional CT-number-to-SPR conversion based on single-energy CT (SECT) imaging is of importance for improving clinical practice. Here, the application of a novel imaging and computational methodology using dual-layer spectral CT (DLCT) was performed toward refining patient-specific SPR estimates. A workflow for DLCT-based treatment planning was devised to evaluate SPR prediction for proton, helium, and carbon ion beam therapy planning in the brain. DLCT- and SECT-based SPR predictions were compared in homogeneous and heterogeneous anatomical regions. This study included eight patients scanned for diagnostic purposes with a DLCT scanner. For each patient, four different treatment plans were created, simulating tumors in different parts of the brain. For homogeneous anatomical regions, mean SPR differences of about 1% between the DLCT- and SECT-based approaches were found. In plans of heterogeneous anatomies, relative (absolute) proton range shifts of 0.6% (0.4 mm) in the mean and up to 4.4% (2.1 mm) at the distal fall-off were observed. In the investigated cohort, 12% of the evaluated organs-at-risk (OARs) presented differences in mean or maximum dose of more than 0.5 Gy (RBE) and up to 6.8 Gy (RBE) over the entire treatment. Range shifts and dose differences in OARs between DLCT and SECT in helium and carbon ion treatment plans were similar to protons. In the majority of investigated cases (75th percentile), SECT- and DLCT-based range estimations were within 0.6 mm. Nonetheless, the magnitude of patient-specific range deviations between SECT and DLCT was clinically relevant in heterogeneous anatomical sites, suggesting further study in larger, more diverse cohorts. Results indicate that patients with brain tumors may benefit from DLCT-based treatment planning.

First-In-Human Validation of CT-Based Proton Range Prediction Using Prompt Gamma Imaging in Prostate Cancer Treatments

PURPOSE

Uncertainty in computed tomography (CT)-based range prediction substantially impairs the accuracy of proton therapy. Direct determination of the stopping-power ratio (SPR) from dual-energy CT (DECT) has been proposed (DirectSPR), and initial validation studies in phantoms and biological tissues have proven a high accuracy. However, a thorough validation of range prediction in patients has not yet been achieved by any means. Here, we present the first systematic validation of CT-based proton range prediction in patients using prompt gamma imaging (PGI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A PGI slit camera system with improved positioning accuracy, using a floor-based docking station, was used. Its overall uncertainty for range prediction validation was determined experimentally with both x-ray and beam measurements. The accuracy of range prediction in patients was determined from clinical PGI measurements during hypofractionated treatment of 5 patients with prostate cancer - in total 30 fractions with in-room control-CTs. For each pencil-beam-scanning spot, the range shift was obtained by comparing the PGI measurement to a control-CT-based PGI simulation. Three different SPR prediction approaches were applied in simulations: a standard CT-number-to-SPR conversion (Hounsfield look-up table [HLUT]), an adapted HLUT (DECT optimized), and DirectSPR. The spot-wise weighted mean range shift from all spots served as a measure for the accuracy of the respective range prediction approach.

RESULTS

A mean range prediction accuracy of 0.0% ± 0.5%, 0.3% ± 0.4%, and 1.8% ± 0.4% was obtained for DirectSPR, adapted HLUT, and standard HLUT, respectively. The overall validation uncertainty of the second-generation PGI slit camera is about 1 mm (2σ) for all approaches, which is smaller than the range prediction uncertainty for deep-seated tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, range prediction accuracy was assessed in clinical routine using PGI range verification in prostate cancer treatments. Both DECT-derived range prediction approaches agree well with the measured proton range from PGI verification, whereas the standard HLUT approach differs relevantly. These results endorse the recent reduction of clinical safety margins in DirectSPR-based treatment planning in our institution.