A dosimetric comparison of the fixed-beam IMRT plans using different leaf width of multileaf collimators for the intermediate risk prostate cancer

Rotational effect and dosimetric impact: HDMLC vs 5-mm MLC leaf width in single isocenter multiple metastases radiosurgery with Brainlab Elements™

Purpose:

To analyse the impact of multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf width in multiple metastases radiosurgery (SRS) considering the target distance to isocenter and rotational displacements.

Methods:

Ten plans were optimised. The plans were created with Elements Multiple Mets SRS v2·0 (Brainlab AG, Munchen, Germany). The mean number of metastases per plan was 5 ± 2 [min 3, max 9], and the mean volume of gross tumour volume (GTV) was 1·1 ± 1·3 cc [min 0·02, max 5·1]. Planning target volume margin criterion was based on GTV-isocenter distance and target dimensions. Plans were performed using 6 MV with high-definition MLC (HDMLC) and reoptimised using 5-mm MLC (MLC-5). Plans were compared using Paddick conformity index (PCI), gradient index, monitor units , volume receiving half of prescription isodose (PIV50), maximum dose to brainstem, optic chiasm and optic nerves, and V12Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy for healthy brain were analysed. The maximum displacement due to rotational combinations was optimised by a genetic algorithm for both plans. Plans were reoptimised and compared using optimised margin.

Results:

HDMLC plans had better conformity and higher dose falloff than MLC-5 plans. Dosimetric differences were statistically significant (p < 0·05). The smaller the lesion volume, the higher the dosimetric differences between both plans. The effect of rotational displacements produced for each target in SRS was not dependent on the MLC (p > 0·05).

Conclusions:

The finer HDMLC offers dosimetric advantages compared with the MLC-5 in terms of target conformity and dose to the surrounding organs at risk. However, only dose falloff differences due to rotations depend on MLC.

Dosimetric comparison of artificial walls of bladder and rectum with real walls in common prostate IMRT techniques: Patient and Monte Carlo study

BACKGROUND

Rectum and bladder are hallow structures and considered as critical organs in prostate cancer intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Therefore, dose received by these organ walls must be considered for prediction of radiobiological effects. Contouring the real organ walls is quite difficult and time consuming in CT/MRI images, so the easy contouring artificial walls with uniform thickness could be appropriated alternatives.

OBJECTIVE

To compare reconstructed artificial walls with real walls of bladder and rectum in common prostate IMRT techniques based on dose volume-histograms (DVHs) derived from artificial and real walls.

METHODS

Artificial walls were reconstructed with 2-10 mm and 2-8 mm thicknesses for bladder and rectum, respectively. Four common IMRT techniques were applied to each patient. Spearman correlation was used to find the relation between the DVHs of true walls with artificial walls and whole organs. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the IMRT techniques and dosimetric comparison were also performed on a standard patient data.

RESULTS

The 2 mm thickness artificial walls showed the minimum differences with the true bladder and rectum walls based on absolute evaluations (the maximum difference < 10cc and standard deviation < 15cc). However, relative evaluations showed that all the artificial walls had high correlations with real walls for selecting dose volume parameters. There was also good agreement between the treatment planning system and MC simulations results.

CONCLUSION

The DVH of whole organs was not a good surrogate of the true wall. The 2 mm artificial walls can be regarded as good alternatives for both of rectum and bladder. However, in relative dose evaluations all studied artificial walls were appropriate.