Kalovidouri A, Firmenich N, Delattre BMA, Picarra M, Becker CD, Montet X, Botsikas D. Fat suppression techniques for breast MRI: Dixon versus spectral fat saturation for 3D T1-weighted at 3 T.
Radiol Med 2017. [PMID:
28643295 DOI:
10.1007/s11547-017-0782-2]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To compare two fat suppression techniques used for 3D T1-weighted sequence in breast MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), namely Dixon versus spectral fat saturation (fat sat).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All breast MRI examinations performed in a Philips 3 T unit between March 2013 and October 2015 including either a Dixon or a fat sat sequence were retrospectively analyzed. The examinations were subjectively evaluated by two independent experienced readers in a scale of 5 for overall quality of fat suppression, homogeneity of fat suppression, definition of anatomic structures and focal lesions, diagnostic confidence for axillary and internal mammary regions and the presence of artifacts, 1 corresponding to excellent and 5 to non-diagnostic quality. Contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) measurements for muscle and focal lesions were also performed.
RESULTS
Overall 161 women (mean age 51.6 ± 12.0 years) underwent 189 MR examinations, 113 with the fat saturation and 76 with the Dixon sequence. Interobserver variability was good (kappa = 0.757). In all subjectively evaluated parameters, the Dixon sequence was superior to the fat sat (p < 0.05). Mean values of CNR for muscle and focal lesions were 9.98 (±4.2), 17.9 (±7.53) for the fat sat and 18.3 (±10.4) and 29.3 (±14.1) for the Dixon sequence, respectively (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
3D T1 Dixon sequence is superior to fat sat for dedicated breast MRI at 3 T, in terms of efficiency of fat suppression and image quality with the added advantage of optimal exploration of the axillary areas.
Collapse