Association of patient age with first pass success in out-of-hospital advanced airway management

The Epidemiology of Out-of-Hospital Pediatric Airway Management in the 2019 ESO Data Collaborative

OBJECTIVES

Airway management is a fundamental skill that Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians must be prepared to perform on patients of any age. We performed one of the first epidemiological studies of out-of-hospital pediatric airway management utilizing the ESO data set.

METHODS

We used the 2019 ESO Data Collaborative public release research data set. We performed a descriptive analysis of all patients <18 years receiving at least one of the following airway management interventions: nasopharyngeal airway, oropharyngeal airway, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), airway suctioning, bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM), tracheal intubation (TI), supraglottic airway (SGA) or surgical airway placement. We determined the success rates for BVM, TI and SGA.

RESULTS

Among 7,422,710 911 EMS activations, there were 346,912 pediatric encounters that resulted in patient care. Airway management occurred in 27,071 encounters (7,803 per 100,000 pediatric EMS patient care events). Use of BVM, intubation or supraglottic airway insertion occurred in 3,496 encounters (1,007 per 100,000 pediatric EMS patient care events). Ventilation with BVM occurred in 2,226 encounters (642 per 100,000 pediatric EMS patient care events), TI in 935 pediatric EMS patient care encounters (270 per 100,000 patient care encounters), and supraglottic airway insertion in 335 patient encounters (97 per 100,000 patient care encounters). Overall TI success was 71.4%, rapid sequence intubation success was 86.3%, and SGA success was 87.2%. Overall TI first pass success rate was 63.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

In the ESO cohort, advanced airway management of children occurred in only 5.9 in 10,000 911 emergency encounters. Overall and first pass success rates for TI were low. These data provide contemporary perspectives of pediatric prehospital airway management in the United States.

Paramedics' Success and Complications in Prehospital Pediatric Intubation: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prehospital pediatric intubation is a potentially life-saving procedure in which paramedics are relied upon. However, due to the anatomical nature of pediatrics and associated adverse events, it is more challenging compared to adult intubation. In this study, the knowledge and attitude of paramedics was assessed by measuring their overall success rate and associated complications.

METHODS

An online search using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted using relevant keywords to include studies that assess success rates and associated complications. Studies for eligibility were screened. Data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled as risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies involving 14,207 pediatrics undergoing intubation by paramedics were included in this study. The prevalence of success rate was 82.5% (95% CI, 0.745-0.832) for overall trials and 77.2% (95% CI, 0.713-0.832) success rate after the first attempt. By subgrouping the patients according to using muscle relaxants during intubation, the group that used muscle relaxants showed a high overall successful rate of 92.5% (95% CI, 0.877-0.973) and 79.9% (95% CI, 0.715-0.994) success rate after the first attempt, more than the group without muscle relaxant which represent 78.9% (95% CI, 0.745-0.832) overall success rate and 73.3% (95% CI, 0.616-0.950) success rate after first attempt.

CONCLUSION

Paramedics have a good overall successful rate of pediatric intubation with a lower complication rate, especially when using muscle relaxants.

Evidence-Based Guideline for Prehospital Airway Management

Airway management is a cornerstone of emergency medical care. This project aimed to create evidence-based guidelines based on the systematic review recently conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). A technical expert panel was assembled to review the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The panel made specific recommendations on the different PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions reviewed in the AHRQ review and created good practice statements that summarize and operationalize these recommendations. The recommendations address the use of ventilation with bag-valve mask ventilation alone vs. supraglottic airways vs. endotracheal intubation for adults and children with cardiac arrest, medical emergencies, and trauma. Additional recommendations address the use of video laryngoscopy and drug-assisted airway management. These recommendations, and the associated good practice statements, offer EMS agencies and clinicians an opportunity to review the available evidence and incorporate it into their airway management strategies.

[The correct way to deal with the definitive surgical airway]

Dealing with a difficult airway is familiar to emergency care providers in both the prehospital and clinical settings. In anesthesiology and emergency medical care different algorithms almost equal in their wording have been introduced, indicating that an emergency front of neck airway access (eFONA) has to be established in the case of a cannot ventilate-cannot oxygenate situation. In a survey (Surveymonkey®) data concerning the level of experience with eFONA, devices required, previous training and complications were allocated among acute and emergency care providers of different backgrounds (doctors and paramedics). Furthermore, we asked about individual attitudes to and frequency of previous situations, in which an eFONA was not established despite strong indications. Of the respondents 15% (n = 63) answered that they had experienced this type of situation. eFONA had been performed by 28% of the interviewed (n = 117), reflecting the high number of military and EMT (emergency medical team) physicians participating in the survey. The number of experiences are rarely representative for the civilian setting. Different adjuncts may be helpful to detect the cricothyroid ligament. To use ultrasound seems obvious but it doubles the time for the detection of the cricothyroid ligament. Laryngeal masks can be employed as a supraglottic airway device (SAD) during "plan B". Stabilizing the airway with a SAD almost doubles the success of identifying laryngeal landmarks in females. The crew resource management (CRM) guidelines are more than essential in threatening situations demanding measures like eFONA. Providers should anticipate emerging problems and whenever feasible call for help and finally speak up. Naming a failed airway should be avoided as it implies a failure of the provider or of the entire airway team. In fact, the term non-accessible airway should be introduced. This might help to avoid the implication of a major failure. So far, an ideal simulator to train eFONA has not been introduced but it is mandatory to train procedures and algorithms on different types of simulators and manikins to achieve mastery.

[Cricothyrotomy : Data situation, guidelines and techniques for the definitive surgical airway]

Cricothyrotomy represents the final approach to secure the airway, in the course of which less invasive measures have failed. It can also primarily be carried out to establish a secure airway. This is essential to protect the patient from a significant hypoxia. This is a cannot ventilate-cannot oxygenate (CVCO) situation, which presumably all colleagues in emergency intensive care medicine and anesthesia have already been confronted with. Evidence-based algorithms for the management of a difficult airway and CVCO have been established. If oxygenation using an endotracheal tube, an extraglottic airway device or bag-valve mask ventilation all fail, the airway must be surgically secured, i.e. using cricothyrotomy. The prevalence of the CVCO situation in a prehospital setting is ca. 1%. No valid prospective randomized in vivo studies have been carried with respect to the question of the best method.

Advanced airway management for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Although airway management is important in pediatric resuscitation, the effectiveness of bag-mask ventilation (BMV) and advanced airway management (AAM), such as endotracheal intubation (ETI) and supraglottic airway (SGA) devices, for prehospital resuscitation of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the efficacy of AAM during prehospital resuscitation of pediatric OHCA cases.

METHODS

We searched four databases from their inception to November 2022 and included randomized controlled trials and observational studies with appropriate adjustments for confounders that evaluated prehospital AAM for OHCA in children aged <18 years in quantitative synthesis. We compared three interventions (BMV, ETI, and SGA) via network meta-analysis using the GRADE Working Group approach. The outcome measures were survival and favorable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge or 1 month after cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

Five studies (including one clinical trial and four cohort studies with rigorous confounding adjustment) involving 4852 patients were analyzed in our quantitative synthesis. Compared with ETI, BMV was associated with survival (relative risk [RR] 0.44 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.25-0.77]) (very low certainty). There were no significant association with survival in the other comparisons (SGA vs. BMV: RR 0.62 [95% CI 0.33-1.15] [low certainty], ETI vs. SGA: RR 0.71 [95% CI 0.39-1.32] [very low certainty]). There was no significant association with favorable neurological outcomes in any comparison (ETI vs. BMV: RR 0.33 [95% CI 0.11-1.02]; SGA vs. BMV: RR 0.50 [95% CI 0.14-1.80]; ETI vs. SGA: RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.18-2.46]) (all very low certainty). In the ranking analysis, the hierarches for efficacy for survival and favorable neurological outcome were BMV > SGA > ETI.

CONCLUSION

Although the available evidence is from observational studies and its certainty is low to very low, prehospital AAM for pediatric OHCA did not improve outcomes.

Prehospital Airway Management: A Systematic Review

Objective: To assess comparative benefits and harms across three airway management approaches (bag valve mask [BVM], supraglottic airway [SGA], and endotracheal intubation [ETI]) used by prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) to treat patients with trauma, cardiac arrest, or medical emergencies, and how they differ based on techniques and devices, EMS personnel and patient characteristics. Data sources: We searched electronic citation databases (Ovid® MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus®) from 1990 to September 2020. Review methods: We followed Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Effective Health Care Program Methods guidance. Outcomes included mortality, neurological function, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and successful advanced airway insertion. Meta-analyses using profile-likelihood random effects models were conducted, with analyses stratified by study design, emergency type, and age. Results: We included 99 studies involving 630,397 patients. We found few differences in primary outcomes across airway management approaches. For survival, there was no difference for BVM versus ETI or SGA in adult and pediatric patients with cardiac arrest or trauma. For neurological function, there was no difference for BVM versus ETI and SGA versus ETI in pediatric patients with cardiac arrest. There was no difference in BVM versus ETI in adults with cardiac arrest, but improved neurological function with BVM or ETI versus SGA. There was no difference in ROSC for patients with cardiac arrest for BVM versus ETI or SGA in adults and pediatrics, or SGA versus ETI in pediatrics. There was higher frequency of ROSC in adults with SGA versus ETI. For successful advanced airway insertion, there was higher first-pass success with SGA versus ETI for all patients except adult medical patients (no difference), and no difference in overall success using SGA versus ETI in adults. Conclusions: The currently available evidence does not indicate benefits of more invasive airway approaches based on survival, neurological function, ROSC, or successful airway insertion. Strength of evidence was low or moderate; most included studies were observational. This supports the need for high-quality randomized controlled trials to advance clinical practice and EMS education and policy, and improve patient-centered outcomes.

A retrospective cohort study on association of age and physician decision making for or against rapid sequence intubation in unconscious patients

In unconscious individuals, rapid sequence intubation (RSI) may be necessary for cardiopulmonary stabilisation and avoidance of secondary damage. Opinions on such invasive procedures in people of older age vary. We thus sought to evaluate a possible association between the probability of receiving prehospital RSI in unconsciousness and increasing age. We conducted a retrospective study in all missions (traumatic and non-traumatic) of the prehospital emergency physician response unit in Graz between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2019, which we searched for Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) below 9. Cardiac arrests were excluded. We performed multivariable regression analysis for RSI with age, GCS, independent living, and suspected cause as independent variables. Of the 769 finally included patients, 256 (33%) received RSI, whereas 513 (67%) did not. Unadjusted rates of RSI were significantly lower in older patients (aged 85 years and older) compared to the reference group aged 50-64 years (13% vs. 51%, p < 0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, patients aged 85 years and older were also significantly less likely to receive RSI [OR (95% CI) 0.76 (0.69-0.84)]. We conclude that advanced age, especially 85 years or older, is associated with significantly lower odds of receiving prehospital RSI in cases of unconsciousness.

Predictors for Prehospital First-Pass Intubation Success in Germany

(1) Background: Endotracheal intubation in the prehospital setting is an important skill for emergency physicians, paramedics, and other members of the EMS providing airway management. Its success determines complications and patient mortality. The aim of this study was to find predictors for first-pass intubation success in the prehospital emergency setting. (2) The study was based on a retrospective analysis of a population-based registry of prehospital advanced airway management in Germany. Cases of endotracheal intubation by the emergency medical services in the cities of Tübingen and Jena between 2016 and 2019 were included. The outcome of interest was first-pass intubation success. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis were used to analyse the influence of predefined predictors, including the characteristics of patients, the intubating staff, and the clinical situation. (3) Results: A total of 308 patients were analysed. After adjustment for multiple confounders, the direct vocal cord view, a less favourable Cormack–Lehane classification, the general practitioner as medical specialty, and location and type of EMS were independent predictors for first-pass intubation success. (4) Conclusions: In physician-led emergency medical services, the laryngoscopic view, medical specialty, type of EMS, and career level are associated with FPS. The latter points towards the importance of experience and regular training in endotracheal intubation.

Prehospital Pediatric Respiratory Distress and Airway Management Interventions: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document

Devices and techniques such as bag-valve-mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, supraglottic airway devices, and noninvasive ventilation offer important tools for airway management in critically ill EMS patients. Over the past decade the tools, technology, and strategies used to assess and manage pediatric respiratory and airway emergencies have evolved, and evidence regarding their use continues to grow.NAEMSP recommends:Methods and tools used to properly size pediatric equipment for ages ranging from newborns to adolescents should be available to all EMS clinicians. All pediatric equipment should be routinely checked and clearly identifiable in EMS equipment supply bags and vehicles.EMS agencies should train and equip their clinicians with age-appropriate pulse oximetry and capnography equipment to aid in the assessment and management of pediatric respiratory distress and airway emergencies.EMS agencies should emphasize noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and effective bag-valve-mask ventilation strategies in children.Supraglottic airways can be used as primary or secondary airway management interventions for pediatric respiratory failure and cardiac arrest in the EMS setting.Pediatric endotracheal intubation has unclear benefit in the EMS setting. Advanced approaches to pediatric ETI including drug-assisted airway management, apneic oxygenation, and use of direct and video laryngoscopy require further research to more clearly define their risks and benefits prior to widespread implementation.If considering the use of pediatric endotracheal intubation, the EMS medical director must ensure the program provides pediatric-specific initial training and ongoing competency and quality management activities to ensure that EMS clinicians attain and maintain mastery of the intervention.Paramedic use of direct laryngoscopy paired with Magill forceps to facilitate foreign body removal in the pediatric patient should be maintained even when pediatric endotracheal intubation is not approved as a local clinical intervention.

Prehospital Surgical Airway Management: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document

Bag-valve-mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation have been the mainstay of prehospital airway management for over four decades. Recently, supraglottic device use has risen due to various factors. The combination of bag-valve-mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, and supraglottic devices allows for successful airway management in a majority of patients. However, there exists a small portion of patients who are unable to be intubated and cannot be adequately ventilated with either a facemask or a supraglottic airway. These patients require an emergent surgical airway. A surgical airway is an important component of all airway algorithms, and in some cases may be the only viable approach; therefore, it is imperative that EMS agencies that are credentialed to manage airways have the capability to perform surgical airways when appropriate. The National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians (NAEMSP) recommends the following for emergency medical services (EMS) agencies that provide advanced airway management.A surgical airway is reasonable in the prehospital setting when the airway cannot be secured by less invasive means.When indicated, a surgical airway should be performed without delay.A surgical airway is not a substitute for other airway management tools and techniques. It should not be the only rescue option available.Success of an open surgical approach using a scalpel is higher than that of percutaneous Seldinger techniques or needle-jet ventilation in the emergency setting.

Prehospital Drug Assisted Airway Management: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document

Airway management is a critical intervention for patients with airway compromise, respiratory failure, and cardiac arrest. Many EMS agencies use drug-assisted airway management (DAAM) - the administration of sedatives alone or in combination with neuromuscular blockers - to facilitate advanced airway placement in patients with airway compromise or impending respiratory failure who also have altered mental status, agitation, or intact protective airway reflexes. While DAAM provides several benefits including improving laryngoscopy and making insertion of endotracheal tubes and supraglottic airways easier, DAAM also carries important risks. NAEMSP recommends:DAAM is an appropriate tool for EMS clinicians in systems with clear guidelines, sufficient training, and close EMS physician oversight. DAAM should not be used in settings without adequate resources.EMS physicians should develop clinical guidelines informed by evidence and oversee the training and credentialing for safe and effective DAAM.DAAM programs should include best practices of airway management including patient selection, assessmenct and positioning, preoxygenation strategies including apneic oxygenation, monitoring and management of physiologic abnormalities, selection of medications, post-intubation analgesia and sedation, equipment selection, airway confirmation and monitoring, and rescue airway techniques.Post-DAAM airway placement must be confirmed and continually monitored with waveform capnography.EMS clinicians must have the necessary equipment and training to manage patients with failed DAAM, including bag mask ventilation, supraglottic airway devices and surgical airway approaches.Continuous quality improvement for DAAM must include assessment of individual and aggregate performance metrics. Where available for review, continuous physiologic recordings (vital signs, pulse oximetry, and capnography), audio and video recordings, and assessment of patient outcomes should be part of DAAM continuous quality improvement.

Quality Management of Prehospital Pediatric Respiratory Distress and Airway Programs: An NAEMSP Position Statement and Resource Document

The unique challenges of pediatric respiratory and airway emergencies require the development and maintenance of a prehospital quality management program that includes pediatric-focused medical oversight and clinical care expertise, data collection, operational considerations, focused education, and clinician competency evaluation.NAEMSP recommends:Medical director oversight must include a focus on pediatric airway and respiratory management and integrate pediatric-specific elements in guideline development, competency assessment, and skills maintenance efforts.EMS agencies are encouraged to collaborate with medical professionals who have expertise in pediatric emergency care to provide support for quality management initiatives in pediatric respiratory distress and airway management.EMS agencies should define quality indicators for pediatric-specific elements in respiratory distress and airway management and benchmark performance based on regional and national standards.EMS agencies should implement both quantitative (objective) and qualitative (subjective) measures of performance to assess competency in pediatric respiratory distress and airway management.EMS agencies choosing to incorporate pediatric endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway insertion must use pediatric-specific quality management benchmarks and perform focused review of advanced airway management.

Frequency, indications and success of out-of-hospital intubations in Finnish children

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies have shown variable results regarding the success of paediatric emergency endotracheal intubation between different settings and operators. We aimed to describe the paediatric population intubated by physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) and evaluate the factors associated with overall and first-pass success (FPS).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in Finland including all children less than 16 years old who required endotracheal intubation by a HEMS physician from January 2014 to August 2019. Utilising a national HEMS database, we analysed the incidence, indications, overall and first-pass success rates of endotracheal intubation.

RESULTS

A total of 2731 children were encountered by HEMS, and intubation was attempted in 245 (9%); of these, 22 were younger than 1 year, 103 were aged 1-5 years and 120 were aged 6-15 years. The most common indications for airway management were cardiac arrest for the youngest age group, neurological reasons (e.g., seizures) for those aged 1-5 years and trauma for those aged 6-15. The HEMS physicians had an overall success rate of 100% (95% CI: 98-100) and an FPS rate of 86% (95% CI: 82-90). The FPS rate was lower in the youngest age group (p = .002) and for patients in cardiac arrest (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency endotracheal intubation of children is successfully performed by a physician staffed HEMS unit even though these procedures are rare. To improve the care, emphasis should be on airway management of infants and patients in cardiac arrest.

Adjunct Devices for the Pediatric Difficult Airway: A Case Report

This is a case report of a pediatric patient with a difficult airway, in which several airway adjuncts were used simultaneously to successfully provide adequate oxygenation and ventilation during cardiac arrest. Difficult airways are low-incidence, high-risk emergencies in children, and airway adjuncts may be used infrequently, let alone in combination. Included in the discussion of this case are a description of each airway adjunct and a discussion of the process needed to incorporate airway adjuncts safely and effectively into patient care.

Prehospital airway management in the pediatric patient: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Critically ill children may require airway management to optimize delivery of oxygen and ventilation during resuscitation. We performed a systematic review of studies comparing the use of bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM), supraglottic airway devices (SGA), and endotracheal intubation (ETI) in pediatric patients requiring prehospital airway management.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for papers that compared SGA or ETI to BVM use in children, including studies that reported survival outcomes. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We compared key characteristics of the candidate papers, including inclusion criteria, definitions of airway interventions, and association with outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 773 studies, eight met criteria for inclusion. Only one study was a randomized controlled trial; the other seven studies were observational. Four studies compared ETI to BVM, two studies compared SGA to BVM, one study compared ETI to SGA, and two studies compared advanced airway management (AAM) to BVM. Primary outcomes varied, ranging from overall mortality and 24-h mortality to 1-month survival, hospital survival, and neurologically favorable survival. Four of the studies found no difference in survival with the use of ETI, and four found increased mortality with the use of ETI. Associations with outcomes could not be assessed by meta-analysis due to limited number of studies and the wide variation in the design, population, interventions, and outcome measures of the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, studies of prehospital pediatric airway management varied in scope, design, and conclusions. There was insufficient evidence to evaluate efficacy of pediatric prehospital airway management; however, the current research suggests that there are equal or worse outcomes with the use of ETI compared to other airway techniques. Additional clinical trials are needed to assess the merits of this practice.

Success and complications by team composition for prehospital paediatric intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Clinical team composition for prehospital paediatric intubation may affect success and complication rates. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the success and complication rates by type of clinical team.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL for interventional and observational studies describing prehospital intubation attempts in children with overall success, first-pass success, and complication rates. Eligible studies, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias were assessed independently by two reviewers. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.

Results

Forty studies (1989 to 2019) described three types of clinical teams: non-physician teams with no relaxants (22 studies, n = 7602), non-physician teams with relaxants (12 studies, n = 2185), and physician teams with relaxants (12 studies, n = 1780). Twenty-two (n = 3747) and 18 (n = 7820) studies were at low and moderate risk of bias, respectively. Non-physician teams without relaxants had lower overall intubation success rate (72%, 95% CI 67–76%) than non-physician teams with relaxants (95%, 95% CI 93–98%) and physician teams (99%, 95% CI 97–100%). Physician teams had higher first-pass success rate (91%, 95% CI 86–95%) than non-physicians with (75%, 95% CI 69–81%) and without (55%, 95% CI 48–63%) relaxants. Overall airway complication rate was lower in physician teams (10%, 95% CI 3–22%) than non-physicians with (30%, 95% CI 23–38%) and without (39%, 95% CI 28–51%) relaxants.

Conclusion

Physician teams had higher rates of intubation success and lower rates of overall airway complications than other team types. Physician prehospital teams should be utilised wherever practicable for critically ill children requiring prehospital intubation.