Disease diagnosis and severity classification in pulmonary fibrosis using carbonyl volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath

Pulmonary Fibrosis Diagnosis and Disease Progression Detected Via Hair Metabolome Analysis

BACKGROUND

Fibrotic interstitial lung disease is often identified late due to non-specific symptoms, inadequate access to specialist care, and clinical unawareness precluding proper and timely treatment. Biopsy histological analysis is definitive but rarely performed due to its invasiveness. Diagnosis typically relies on high-resolution computed tomography, while disease progression is evaluated via frequent pulmonary function testing. This study tested the hypothesis that pulmonary fibrosis diagnosis and progression could be non-invasively and accurately evaluated from the hair metabolome, with the longer-term goal to minimize patient discomfort.

METHODS

Hair specimens collected from pulmonary fibrosis patients (n = 56) and healthy subjects (n = 14) were processed for metabolite extraction using 2DLC/MS-MS, and data were analyzed via machine learning. Metabolomic data were used to train machine learning classification models tuned via a rigorous combination of cross validation, feature selection, and testing with a hold-out dataset to evaluate classifications of diseased vs. healthy subjects and stable vs. progressed disease.

RESULTS

Prediction of pulmonary fibrosis vs. healthy achieved AUROCTRAIN = 0.888 (0.794-0.982) and AUROCTEST = 0.908, while prediction of stable vs. progressed disease achieved AUROCTRAIN = 0.833 (0.784 - 0.882) and AUROCTEST = 0. 799. Top metabolites for diagnosis included ornithine, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-3-pyridyl-N-oxide-1-butanol, Thr-Phe, desthiobiotin, and proline. Top metabolites for progression included azelaic acid, Thr-Phe, Ala-Tyr, indoleacetyl glutamic acid, and cytidine.

CONCLUSION

This study provides novel evidence that pulmonary fibrosis diagnosis and progression may in principle be evaluated from the hair metabolome. Longer term, this approach may facilitate non-invasive and accurate detection and monitoring of fibrotic lung diseases.

Progress and challenges of developing volatile metabolites from exhaled breath as a biomarker platform

BACKGROUND

The multitude of metabolites generated by physiological processes in the body can serve as valuable biomarkers for many clinical purposes. They can provide a window into relevant metabolic pathways for health and disease, as well as be candidate therapeutic targets. A subset of these metabolites generated in the human body are volatile, known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which can be detected in exhaled breath. These can diffuse from their point of origin throughout the body into the bloodstream and exchange into the air in the lungs. For this reason, breath VOC analysis has become a focus of biomedical research hoping to translate new useful biomarkers by taking advantage of the non-invasive nature of breath sampling, as well as the rapid rate of collection over short periods of time that can occur. Despite the promise of breath analysis as an additional platform for metabolomic analysis, no VOC breath biomarkers have successfully been implemented into a clinical setting as of the time of this review.

AIM OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize the progress made to address the major methodological challenges, including standardization, that have historically limited the translation of breath VOC biomarkers into the clinic. We highlight what steps can be taken to improve these issues within new and ongoing breath research to promote the successful development of the VOCs in breath as a robust source of candidate biomarkers. We also highlight key recent papers across select fields, critically reviewing the progress made in the past few years to advance breath research.

KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW

VOCs are a set of metabolites that can be sampled in exhaled breath to act as advantageous biomarkers in a variety of clinical contexts.

Identification of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Prediction of Disease Severity via Machine Learning Analysis of Comprehensive Metabolic Panel and Complete Blood Count Data

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) typically relies on high-resolution computed tomography imaging (HRCT) or histopathology, while monitoring disease severity is done via frequent pulmonary function testing (PFT). More reliable and convenient methods of diagnosing fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) type and monitoring severity would allow for early identification and enhance current therapeutic interventions. This study tested the hypothesis that a machine learning (ML) ensemble analysis of comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) and complete blood count (CBC) data can accurately distinguish IPF from connective tissue disease ILD (CTD-ILD) and predict disease severity as seen with PFT.

METHODS

Outpatient data with diagnosis of IPF or CTD-ILD (n = 103 visits by 53 patients) were analyzed via ML methodology to evaluate (1) IPF vs CTD-ILD diagnosis; (2) %predicted Diffusing Capacity of Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) moderate or mild vs severe; (3) %predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) moderate or mild vs severe; and (4) %predicted FVC mild vs moderate or severe.

RESULTS

ML methodology identified IPF from CTD-ILD with AUCTEST = 0.893, while PFT was classified as DLCO moderate or mild vs severe with AUCTEST = 0.749, FVC moderate or mild vs severe with AUCTEST = 0.741, and FVC mild vs moderate or severe with AUCTEST = 0.739. Key features included albumin, alanine transaminase, %lymphocytes, hemoglobin, %eosinophils, white blood cell count, %monocytes, and %neutrophils.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of CMP and CBC data via proposed ML methodology offers the potential to distinguish IPF from CTD-ILD and predict severity on associated PFT with accuracy that meets or exceeds current clinical practice.