Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography image quality assurance for Vero4DRT system

Improving linac integrated cone beam computed tomography image quality using tube current modulation

PURPOSE

Linac integrated cone beam CT (CBCT) scanners have become widespread tool for image guidance in radiotherapy. The current implementation uses constant imaging fluence across all the projection angles, which leads to anisotropic noise properties and suboptimal image quality for noncircular symmetric objects. Tube current modulation (TCM) is widely used in conventional CT. The purpose of this work was to implement TCM on a linac integrated CBCT scanner and evaluate its impact on image quality under varying scatter conditions and scatter correction strategies.

METHODS

We have implemented TCM on a nonclinical Elekta Versa HD linear accelerator with enhanced x-ray generator functionality including pulse width modulation. The pulse width was modulated using two Arduino programmable microcontrollers: one placed on the kV arm to measure the projection angle and the other connected to the kV generator control board to vary x-ray pulse width as function of gantry angle and precalculated transmission. An in-house developed phantom with a ratio of the left-right to anterior-posterior path length of 1.85:1 was scanned. Image quality was determined using the anisotropicity of the 2D noise power spectra (NPS) in the transverse plane and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). In addition, to determine the impact of scatter on the applicability of the TCM method we have modified the generated scatter using three different collimators in the cranio-caudal direction as well as with and without an antiscatter grid (ASG).

RESULTS

Application of the TCM led to 30-78% reduction of the angular anisotropicity of the NPS in the transverse plane. The amount of reduction depended on the scatter conditions, with lower values corresponding to higher scatter conditions. The same was true for the CNR: when scatter contribution was low (presence of an ASG or very aggressive collimation) the CNR was improved by about 30%, while in high scatter conditions the CNR was improved by about 12%.

CONCLUSIONS

TCM has the potential to improve CBCT image quality, but this depends on the amount of detected x-ray scatter.

Comparison of three different phantoms used for Winston-Lutz test with Artiscan software

BACKGROUND

One of the most important test in every quality assurances process of medical linear accelerators is the Winston-Lutz test, allowing an evaluation of the treatment isocentre in the light of uncertainty of the position of the collimator, the gantry and the couch.

AIM

The purpose of this work was analysis of the results of the Winston-Lutz test performed with three different phantoms for two different accelerators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Measurements were performed on two Varian machines: TrueBeam equipped with aS1200 EPID and TrueBeam equipped with aS1000 EPID. During the study three different phantoms dedicated for verification of the radiation isocentre were used: PTW Isoball, AQUILAB Isocentre Phantom and Varian Isocentre Cube. Analysis of the DICOM images was performed in Artiscan software.

RESULTS

For TrueBeam with as1200 EPID, gantry MV isocentre was about 0.18 mm larger for Varian Isocentre Cube than for two other phantoms used in this study. The largest variability of this parameter was observed for the couch. The results differed to 1.16 mm. For TrueBeam with as1000 EPID, results for collimator isocentre with PTW Isoball phantom were about 0.10 mm larger than for two other phantoms. For the gantry, results obtained with Varian Isocentre Cube were 0.21 mm larger.

CONCLUSION

The obtained results for all three phantoms are within the accepted tolerance range. The largest differences were observed for treatment couch, which may be related to the phantom mobility during couch movement.

Image quality and absorbed dose comparison of single- and dual-source cone-beam computed tomography

Purpose

Dual‐source cone‐beam computed tomography (DCBCT) is currently available in the Vero4DRT image‐guided radiotherapy system. We evaluated the image quality and absorbed dose for DCBCT and compared the values with those for single‐source CBCT (SCBCT).

Methods

Image uniformity, Hounsfield unit (HU) linearity, image contrast, and spatial resolution were evaluated using a Catphan phantom. The rotation angle for acquiring SCBCT and DCBCT images is 215° and 115°, respectively. The image uniformity was calculated using measurements obtained at the center and four peripheral positions. The HUs of seven materials inserted into the phantom were measured to evaluate HU linearity and image contrast. The Catphan phantom was scanned with a conventional CT scanner to measure the reference HU for each material. The spatial resolution was calculated using high‐resolution pattern modules. Image quality was analyzed using ImageJ software ver. 1.49. The absorbed dose was measured using a 0.6‐cm³ ionization chamber with a 16‐cm‐diameter cylindrical phantom, at the center and four peripheral positions of the phantom, and calculated using weighted cone‐beam CT dose index (CBCTDI_w).

Results

Compared with that of SCBCT, the image uniformity of DCBCT was slightly reduced. A strong linear correlation existed between the measured HU for DCBCT and the reference HU, although the linear regression slope was different from that of the reference HU. DCBCT had poorer image contrast than did SCBCT, particularly with a high‐contrast material. There was no significant difference between the spatial resolutions of SCBCT and DCBCT. The absorbed dose for DCBCT was higher than that for SCBCT, because in DCBCT, the two x‐ray projections overlap between 45° and 70°.

Conclusions

We found that the image quality was poorer and the absorbed dose was higher for DCBCT than for SCBCT in the Vero4DRT.