1
|
Investigation into the Current State of Nuclear Energy and Nuclear Waste Management—A State-of-the-Art Review. ENERGIES 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/en15124275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Nuclear power can replace fossil fuels and will have a decisive impact on the change in the approach to conventional energy. However, nuclear (or radioactive) wastes are produced by the operation of the nuclear reactors should be safely and properly disposed of. This paper assesses the uranium resources and the global state of nuclear power plants and determines the energy mixes in different countries using the most nuclear energy. Furthermore, this paper analysed the nuclear waste management and disposal and the depletion of abiotic resources, and the primary energy sources of a basic production process using electricity mix and nuclear electricity for a basic production (PET bottle manufacturing) process. The life cycle assessment was completed by applying the GaBi 8.0 (version 10.6) software and the CML method. In this study, we limit our discussion to high-level nuclear waste (HLW) and spent nuclear fuel (SNF) waste. We do not consider waste generated from uranium mining and milling, which is usually disposed of in near-surface impoundments close to the mine or the mill. The investigation of waste management methods is limited to European countries. This research work is relevant because determining abiotic resources is important in a life cycle assessment and current literature available on LCA analysis for nuclear powers remains under-developed. These results can guide and compare manufacturing processes involving a nuclear electricity and electricity grid mix input. The results of this research can be used to develop production processes using nuclear energy with lower abiotic depletion impacts. This research work facilitates the industry in making predictions for a production-scale plant using an LCA of production processes with nuclear energy consumption.
Collapse
|
2
|
Jagoda M. Determination of Motion Parameters of Selected Major Tectonic Plates Based on GNSS Station Positions and Velocities in the ITRF2014. SENSORS 2021; 21:s21165342. [PMID: 34450784 PMCID: PMC8397994 DOI: 10.3390/s21165342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Current knowledge about tectonic plate movement is widely applied in numerous scientific fields; however, questions still remain to be answered. In this study, the focus is on the determination and analysis of the parameters that describe tectonic plate movement, i.e., the position (Φ and Λ) of the rotation pole and angular rotation speed (ω). The study was based on observational material, namely the positions and velocities of the GNSS stations in the International Terrestrial Reference Frame 2014 (ITRF2014), and based on these data, the motion parameters of five major tectonic plates were determined. All calculations were performed using software based on a least squares adjustment procedure that was developed by the author. The following results were obtained: for the African plate, Φ = 49.15 ± 0.10°, Λ = −80.82 ± 0.30°, and ω = 0.267 ± 0.001°/Ma; for the Australian plate, Φ = 32.94 ± 0.05°, Λ = 37.70 ± 0.12°, and ω = 0.624 ± 0.001°/Ma; for the South American plate, Φ = –19.03 ± 0.20°, Λ = −119.78 ± 0.39°, and ω = 0.117 ± 0.001°/Ma; for the Pacific plate, Φ = −62.45 ± 0.07°, Λ = 111.01 ± 0.14°, and ω = 0.667 ± 0.001°/Ma; and for the Antarctic plate, Φ = 61.54 ± 0.30°, Λ = −123.01 ± 0.49°, and ω = 0.241 ± 0.003°/Ma. Then, the results were compared with the geological plate motion model NNR-MORVEL56 and the geodetic model ITRF2014 PMM, with good agreement. In the study, a new approach is proposed for determining plate motion parameters, namely the sequential method. This method allows one to optimize the data by determining the minimum number of stations required for a stable solution and by identifying the stations that negatively affect the quality of the solution and increase the formal errors of the determined parameters. It was found that the stability of the solutions of the Φ, Λ, and ω parameters varied depending on the parameters and the individual tectonic plates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Jagoda
- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Environmental and Geodetic Sciences, Koszalin University of Technology, Śniadeckich 2, 75-453 Koszalin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scheidegger JM, Jackson CR, McEvoy FM, Norris S. Modelling permafrost thickness in Great Britain over glacial cycles. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2019; 666:928-943. [PMID: 30970500 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Like other countries, the UK has opted for deep geological disposal for the long-term, safe management of higher-activity radioactive waste. However, a site and a geological environment have yet to be identified to host a geological disposal facility. In considering its long-term safety functionality, it is necessary to consider natural processes, such as permafrost development, that have the potential to alter the geological environment over the time-scale of glacial-interglacial cycles. We applied a numerical model to simulate the impact of long-term climatic variability on groundwater flow and permafrost dynamics in two contrasting geological settings in Great Britain: (i) higher strength rocks (HSR) overlain by higher permeability sandstones with a high topographic gradient (GS1); (ii) a mixed sedimentary sequence of high and low permeability rocks resting on igneous HSR with a very low topographic gradient (GS2). We evaluated the sensitivity of simulated permafrost thickness to a variety of climatic and subsurface conditions. Uncertainty in the scaling of the surface temperature time-series, 10-25 °C below present day temperature, has the largest impact on maximum permafrost thickness, PFmax, compared to other variables. However, considering plausible parameter ranges for UK settings, PFmax is up to twice as sensitive to changes in thermal conductivity and geothermal heat flux than to changes in porosity. Heat advection only affects modelled PFmax for high hydraulic conductivity rocks and if permafrost is considered to be relatively permeable. Whilst local differences in permafrost thickness of tens of meters, caused by variations in heat advection, are of minor importance over glacial-interglacial cycles, heat advection can be important in the development of taliks and the maintenance of a more active groundwater flow system. We conclude that it is likely to be important to simulate the effect of heat advection on coupled permafrost and groundwater flow systems in settings containing higher permeability lithological sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna M Scheidegger
- British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK.
| | - Christopher R Jackson
- British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
| | - Fiona M McEvoy
- British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
| | - Simon Norris
- Radioactive Waste Management Limited, Curie Avenue, Harwell, Didcot OX11 0RH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quinto F, Blechschmidt I, Garcia Perez C, Geckeis H, Geyer F, Golser R, Huber F, Lagos M, Lanyon B, Plaschke M, Steier P, Schäfer T. Multiactinide Analysis with Accelerator Mass Spectrometry for Ultratrace Determination in Small Samples: Application to an in Situ Radionuclide Tracer Test within the Colloid Formation and Migration Experiment at the Grimsel Test Site (Switzerland). Anal Chem 2017; 89:7182-7189. [PMID: 28598602 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The multiactinide analysis with accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) was applied to samples collected from the run 13-05 of the Colloid Formation and Migration (CFM) experiment at the Grimsel Test Site (GTS). In this in situ radionuclide tracer test, the environmental behavior of 233U, 237Np, 242Pu, and 243Am was investigated in a water conductive shear zone under conditions relevant for a nuclear waste repository in crystalline rock. The concentration of the actinides in the GTS groundwater was determined with AMS over 6 orders of magnitude from ∼15 pg/g down to ∼25 ag/g. Levels above 10 fg/g were investigated with both sector field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (SF-ICPMS) and AMS. Agreement within a relative uncertainty of 50% was found for 237Np, 242Pu, and 243Am concentrations determined with the two analytical methods. With the extreme sensitivity of AMS, the long-term release and retention of the actinides was investigated over 8 months in the tailing of the breakthrough curve of run 13-05 as well as in samples collected up to 22 months after. Furthermore, the evidence of masses 241 and 244 u in the CFM samples most probably representing 241Am and 244Pu employed in a previous tracer test demonstrated the analytical capability of AMS for in situ studies lasting more than a decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Quinto
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE) , Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Ingo Blechschmidt
- NAGRA (National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste) , Hardstrasse 73, CH-5430 Wettingen, Switzerland
| | - Carmen Garcia Perez
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE) , Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Horst Geckeis
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE) , Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Frank Geyer
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE) , Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Robin Golser
- VERA Laboratory, Faculty of Physics-Isotope Research and Nuclear Physics, University of Vienna , Währinger Straße 17, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian Huber
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE) , Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Markus Lagos
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE) , Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.,Steinmann-Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Paläontologie, University of Bonn , Poppelsdorfer Schloss, 53115 Bonn, Germany
| | - Bill Lanyon
- Fracture Systems Ltd , Tregurrian, Ayr, TR26 1EQ St. Ives, United Kingdom
| | - Markus Plaschke
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE) , Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Peter Steier
- VERA Laboratory, Faculty of Physics-Isotope Research and Nuclear Physics, University of Vienna , Währinger Straße 17, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Thorsten Schäfer
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE) , Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.,Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena (FSU) , Institute of Geosciences, Applied Geology, Burgweg 11, D-07749 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|