1
|
Smetana S, Ristic D, Pleissner D, Tuomisto HL, Parniakov O, Heinz V. Meat substitutes: Resource demands and environmental footprints. RESOURCES, CONSERVATION, AND RECYCLING 2023; 190:106831. [PMID: 36874227 PMCID: PMC9936781 DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The modern food system is characterized with high environmental impact, which is in many cases associated with increased rates of animal production and overconsumption. The adoption of alternatives to meat proteins (insects, plants, mycoprotein, microalgae, cultured meat, etc.) might potentially influence the environmental impact and human health in a positive or negative way but could also trigger indirect impacts with higher consumption rates. Current review provides a condensed analysis on potential environmental impacts, resource consumption rates and unintended trade-offs associated with integration of alternative proteins in complex global food system in the form of meat substitutes. We focus on emissions of greenhouse gases, land use, non-renewable energy use and water footprint highlighted for both ingredients used for meat substitutes and ready products. The benefits and limitations of meat substitution are highlighted in relation to a weight and protein content. The analysis of the recent research literature allowed us to define issues, that require the attention of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergiy Smetana
- German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Germany
| | - Dusan Ristic
- German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Germany
- Institute of Food Technology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Austria
| | - Daniel Pleissner
- Institute for Food and Environmental Research (ILU e. V.), Germany
- Institute for Sustainable Chemistry, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Hanna L. Tuomisto
- Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), University of Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki, Finland
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Finland
| | | | - Volker Heinz
- German Institute of Food Technologies (DIL e.V.), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nagy J, Do Thi HT, Toth AJ. Life Cycle, PESTLE and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Membrane Contactor-Based Nitrogen Recovery Process. MEMBRANES 2023; 13:87. [PMID: 36676894 PMCID: PMC9865621 DOI: 10.3390/membranes13010087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Nitrogen is one of the most critical nutrients in the biosphere, and it is an essential nutrient for plant growth. Nitrogen exists in the atmosphere vastly as a gaseous form, but only reactive nitrogen is usable for plants. It is a valuable resource and worth recovering in the wastewater sector. The aim of this work was to prepare a comprehensive environmental analysis of a novel membrane contactor-based process, which is capable of highly efficient nitrogen removal from wastewater. Life cycle assessment (LCA), PESTLE and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) were applied to evaluate the process. The EF 3.0 method, preferred by the European Commission, IMPACT World+, ReCiPe 2016 and IPCC 2021 GWP100 methods were used with six different energy resources-electricity high voltage, solar, nuclear, heat and power and wind energy. The functional unit of 1 m3 of water product was considered as output and "gate-to-gate" analysis was examined. The results of our study show that renewable energy resources cause a significantly lower environmental load than traditional energy resources. TOPSIS score was used to evaluate the alternatives in the case of MCDA. For the EU region, the most advantageous option was found to be wind energy onshore with a score of 0.76, and the following, nuclear, was 0.70.
Collapse
|
3
|
Rebolledo-Leiva R, Almeida-García F, Pereira-Lorenzo S, Ruíz-Nogueira B, Moreira MT, González-García S. Determining the environmental and economic implications of lupin cultivation in wheat-based organic rotation systems in Galicia, Spain. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 845:157342. [PMID: 35842156 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Crop rotation represents a potentially sustainable strategy to address environmental problems of intensive agricultural practices, such as soil degradation, biodiversity reduction, and greenhouse gas emissions. This manuscript assesses the environmental and economic implications of introducing lupin cultivation into winter wheat-based rotation systems under an organic regime in Galicia, Spain. Life Cycle Assessment methodology was used to determine the environmental impacts of three rotation systems over a six-year period: lupin → wheat → rapeseed (OA1), lupin → potato → wheat (OA2), and lupin → wheat → rapeseed ‖ maize (OA3). For a robust assessment, three functional units were applied: land management (ha), economic indicator (gross margin in euros) and protein content (1 kg of protein-corrected grain). Moreover, the environmental profiles were compared with rotation systems without lupin crop in a conventional regime. In terms of Global Warming, impacts of about 2214, 3119 and 766 kg CO2eq·ha-1 were obtained for OA1, OA2 and OA3, respectively. Moreover, OA1 is the best rotation in terms of land and protein. Meanwhile, OA2 rotation is the best choice in the economic function, as it obtained the highest level of gross margin (5708 €·ha-1). Furthermore, with the exception of acidification, organic systems are less impactful than conventional systems. Ammonia emissions from the use of manure are the reason for these higher impacts. Organic rotations OA1 and OA2 have about 6 % or 15 % less gross margin than their conventional counterparts, respectively, however, an increase of 28 % was obtained for rotation OA3. This study helps decision-makers to implement environmentally and economically viable strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Rebolledo-Leiva
- CRETUS, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| | - Fernando Almeida-García
- Grupo Da Cunha, 15175 Carral, Spain; Department of Crop Production and Engineering Projects, High Polytechnic School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Santiago Pereira-Lorenzo
- Department of Crop Production and Engineering Projects, High Polytechnic School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Benigno Ruíz-Nogueira
- Department of Crop Production and Engineering Projects, High Polytechnic School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - María Teresa Moreira
- CRETUS, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Sara González-García
- CRETUS, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen D, Wang C, Liu Y. Investigation of the nitrogen flows of the food supply chain in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China during 1978-2017. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2022; 314:115038. [PMID: 35460985 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Reactive nitrogen (Nr) is an indispensable material for food production. However, it may cause serious environmental problems. The enhancement of nitrogen management in the food supply chain is an effective way to reduce Nr loss and increase Nr use efficiency. While Nr flows in association with the food chain have synergy in a mega-region, in-depth investigations at a cross-regional scale have remained relatively undocumented. This study developed a food-related Nr flow model based on a material flow analysis for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region (BTH) during the years 1978-2017. A multi-regional input-output method was applied to investigate the Nr emissions embodied in the transboundary food supply. The results showed that the total Nr emissions from the food system during the years 1978-2017 in the BTH region increased until 2004 and subsequently decreased gradually. In 2017, Beijing exhibited the lowest Nr emissions per capita (2.3 kg N/cap) and per land use (3089 kg N/km2), while Hebei and Tianjin demonstrated the greatest Nr emissions intensity by capita (13.6 kg N/cap) and by land use (6392 kg N/km2), respectively. While farming and livestock husbandry dominated the regional Nr emissions (i.e., responsible for 90% of the total in 2017), food consumption and waste management have had an increasingly substantial role, as their shared percentage in the total increased by 22% over the study period. Nr emissions resulting from the inner-transboundary food supply chain decreased by 81% between 2012 and 2015 but dramatically increased by 231% between 2015 and 2017. This rebound effect partially resulted from the implementation of coordinated development planning for the BTH region in 2015. This study can facilitate the efficient regulation of regional nitrogen flows and the desired transition of food supply chain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Chen
- School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Chunyan Wang
- School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Yi Liu
- School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hesampour R, Taki M, Fathi R, Hassani M, Halog A. Energy-economic-environmental cycle evaluation comparing two polyethylene and polycarbonate plastic greenhouses in cucumber production (from production to packaging and distribution). THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 828:154232. [PMID: 35283131 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Excessive consumption and improper management of inputs would lead to environmental damages, as well as decreased economic benefits. Thus, a thorough examination of the entire production process from the viewpoint of energy flow, economic profit, and environmental effects can identify hotspots and facilitate input management. Accordingly, in the current investigation, energy, economic and environmental aspects of greenhouse cucumber production systems were measured by life cycle assessment (LCA) technique and cumulative exergy demand (CExD) analysis by considering different greenhouse structures. Furthermore, the data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach was used to determine the efficiency of manufacturing units and optimal consumption pattern. The information required was acquired through interviews and questionnaires with 35 greenhouse owners, and consultation with greenhouse enterprises in the Khuzestan province of Iran. Based on the findings, energy consumed was 6626.45 MJton-1 in Sc1, and 6410.32 MJton-1 in Sc 3. The findings of benchmarking revealed that boosting the efficiency of the crop production process can lower input energy by 14.80%. The energy consumption for the construction of the first and second type of greenhouses was calculated to be 14,811.13 and 17,541.73 MJ (1000 m2)-1, respectively. With regard to the production variable costs, chemical fertilizers and labor had the largest contributions to the total expenses, at 7.6 (15.41%) and 7.87 $tonne-1(15.94%), respectively. In the evaluation of the energy and economic indicators, the combined indicator of Energy Intensiveness for the first and second types of greenhouse systems was found to be 80.26 and 77.07 MJ$-1, respectively, indicating higher energy-economic productivity of the first type of system. Based on LCA results, direct emissions due to input consumption (air: carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrogen oxides (NOx); soil: mercury (Hg), copper (Cu), and lead (Pb)), and indirect emissions induced by chemical fertilizers, greenhouse structures, and chemical pesticides production are the environmental hotspots.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Hesampour
- Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, P.O. Box: 6341773637, Mollasani, Iran.
| | - Morteza Taki
- Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, P.O. Box: 6341773637, Mollasani, Iran
| | - Rostam Fathi
- Department of Agricultural Machinery and Mechanization Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Rural Development, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, P.O. Box: 6341773637, Mollasani, Iran
| | - Mehrdad Hassani
- Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Anthony Halog
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xiang L, Liu S, Ye S, Yang H, Song B, Qin F, Shen M, Tan C, Zeng G, Tan X. Potential hazards of biochar: The negative environmental impacts of biochar applications. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2021; 420:126611. [PMID: 34271443 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Biochar has been widely used as an environmentally friendly material for soil improvement and remediation, water pollution control, greenhouse gas emission reduction, and other purposes because of its characteristics such as a large surface area, porous structure, and abundant surface O-containing functional groups. However, some surface properties (i.e., (i) some surface properties (i.e., organic functional groups and inorganic components), (ii) changes in pH), and (iii) chemical reactions (e.g., aromatic C ring oxidation) that occur between biochar and the application environment may result in the release of harmful components. In this study, biochars with a potential risk to the environment were classified according to their harmful components, surface properties, structure, and particle size, and the potential negative environmental effects of these biochars and the mechanisms inducing these negative effects were reviewed. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the negative environmental impacts of biochar on soil, water, and atmospheric environments. It also summarizes various technical methods of environment-related risk detection and evaluation of biochar application, thereby providing a baseline reference and guiding significance for future biochar selection and toxicity detection, evaluation, and avoidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Xiang
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, PR China
| | - Shaoheng Liu
- College of Chemistry and Material Engineering, Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde 415000, Hunan, PR China
| | - Shujing Ye
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, PR China
| | - Hailan Yang
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, PR China
| | - Biao Song
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, PR China
| | - Fanzhi Qin
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, PR China
| | - Maocai Shen
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, PR China
| | - Chang Tan
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, PR China
| | - Guangming Zeng
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, PR China.
| | - Xiaofei Tan
- College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University, and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Towards Sustainable Farm Production System: A Case Study of Corn Farming. SUSTAINABILITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/su13169243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Many recent studies show that most of the crop production systems in developing countries are not environmentally sustainable. This study uses the life cycle assessment (LCA) to investigate the potential impacts of corn production in Pakistan on global warming and human health damages and also suggests mitigation strategies to reduce environmental impacts towards sustainable crop production based on the results. Land-based, mass-based, and energy-based functional units were used. IMPACT 2002+ methodology—a combination of IMPACT 2002, Eco-Indicator 99, CML, and intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC)—is used for the impact assessment. The results demonstrated that the global warming potential of one-ton production of corn, one-hectare corn farm, and production of 1000 MJ energy were 354.18, 34,569.90, and 1275.13 kg CO2 equivalents, respectively. The off-farm and on-farm emissions of nitrogen-based chemical fertilizers were the hotspots in the most impact categories. Moreover, human health damages followed by global warming as environmental externalities were also associated with corn production. We also highlighted the production areas with light, medium and extreme environmental externalities with Toba Tek Singh and Okara districts in the Punjab province of Pakistan being the most and least contributing districts towards global warming, respectively. Results further indicated that a 5 to 100% reduction of chemical fertilizers would mitigate the environmental impacts of corn production by 4.38 to 87.58% and 2.16 to 43.30% in terms of aquatic acidification and global warming, respectively. Modern farming systems and conservation technologies were suggested to reduce emissions and improve the environmental performance of corn production. Furthermore, agricultural extension and the ministry of agriculture should pay more attention to farmers’ education on emissions from farming inputs and their impact on climate.
Collapse
|