Incidence of maxillofacial fractures in motor vehicle accidents treated in Dubai

The pattern of maxillofacial fractures associated with rollover accidents: A 7-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to assess the incidence and pattern of maxillofacial fractures and related demographic data in the victims of rollover crashes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was based on medical records of patients who sustained maxillofacial injuries following rollover accidents. Investigated data included age, gender, accident date and time, accident cause, seat belt usage, airbag deployment, road type, anatomical location of the facial fracture, and treatment approach.

RESULTS

Among the 147 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the most prevalent age groups were 20-30 (36.7%) and 30-40 (32.7%) years, with a mean age of 33.6 ± 9.7 years. The male-to-female ratio was 6:1. Most crashes occurred in March, August, and July. These accidents involved 69.4% light vehicles and 39.6% heavy vehicles. The leading causes of rollover crashes were speeding (58.5%) followed by distracted driving (21.1%) and traffic rule violations (13.6%). The most prevalent injuries were fractures of the maxillary sinus wall (40.8%), nasal bones (39.5%), zygomaticomaxillary complex (36.1%), and the mandible (32.6%). Surgical intervention was necessary for 44.2% of patients, while 12.9% of cases underwent close reduction, and 42.9% did not require any surgical intervention. The occurrence of nasal bone fractures was significantly lower in cases where seat belts were worn and zygomatic arch fractures were less frequent in incidents with airbag deployment.

CONCLUSIONS

In rollover crashes, the midface is the most vulnerable anatomical location. Utilization of seat belts and airbag deployment has the potential to prevent nasal bone and zygomatic arch fractures.

Clinical risk factors associated with cerebrospinal fluid leak in facial trauma: A retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak occurs most commonly following skull fracture, with a CSF leakage complicating up to 2% of all head traumas. This study aims to identify demographic and injury characteristics correlated with the highest risk of CSF leak in patients with known facial fractures.

METHODS

Retrospective data was collected from a previously described trauma registry from 2010 to 2019. Patients over 18 years old with any type of facial fracture, known CSF leak status, available neuroimaging, and hospital admission were included. Chi-Square analysis for demographic and injury characteristic data were utilized.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients with CSF leak and 4907 patients without CSF leak were included in the database. Patients with CSF leak tended to be younger than those without CSF leak (38.45 +/- 0.28 vs 44.08 +/- 0.28, M +/- SE, p = 0.0197). CSF leak depended on the mechanism of injury (MOI; X² =27.02, df=2, p = 0.0000013), with CSF leak rates highest in penetrating injuries (4.87%) and motor vehicle accidents (1.78%) compared to blunt injuries (0.95%); age did not significantly differ between the MOI groups (p = 0.11). CSF leak was also more common in patients with a lower Glasgow coma scale (GCS; 7.95 +/- 0.58 vs 12.21 +/- 0.10, p = 10^-15), LeFort type 2&3 and pan-facial fractures compared to all other facial fracture types (8.9% vs 1.2%, p = 10^-15), and radiographic midline shift (29.4% vs 9.1%, p = 10^-15). There was a trend towards a higher proportion of males in those with CSF leak compared to those without (83.3% vs 73.7% males, p = 0.073), and in patients with prolonged loss of consciousness (LOC; 9.43% with LOC > 1 h vs 2.69% LOC < 1 h, p = 0.056).

CONCLUSION

Facial fractures often present with CSF leak, and certain demographic and injury risk factors including younger age, worse GCS score, evidence of midline shift, and certain mechanisms of injury (penetrating and motor vehicle) are correlated with increased risk and warrant close screening and follow-up for CSF leak detection. LeFort type 2&3 and pan-facial fractures are at high risk of CSF leak.

Midface fracture pattern in a tertiary care hospital – A prospective study

Introduction

The midface with multiple bones and cavities is vulnerable to fractures more commonly. Midface is one of the most frequently injured areas of the body, accounting for 23%–97% of all facial fractures. The classic LeFort type of fractures are uncommon nowadays and a more common picture is more severe forms primarily due to the high-speed vehicles that are a major cause of these fractures. It, therefore, has become imperative to determine the commonly occurring patterns of fractures in this area in the present time for a better insight into diagnosis and treatment plans. The aim of this article was to determine fracture patterns in midface trauma to ease the treatment planning in such a scenario.

Materials and Methods:

This prospective study included 114 patients who reported to a tertiary hospital during a 4-year period and were diagnosed with suspected midface fractures. The etiology and pattern of fractures of midface were assessed based on history, clinical examination, and imaging data. The diagnosis of a fracture was based on the clinical history, signs and symptoms, manual examination, and correct interpretation of radiographs and computed tomography. Midface fractures were recorded as LeFort I, II, III, dentoalveolar, palatal, zygomatic complex fracture, nasal bones, naso-orbital-ethmoidal complex, and orbital and zygomatic arch fractures. Etiological factors were classified as road traffic accidents (RTAs), fall, assault, and sports injuries.

Results:

During the 4-year period, a total of 114 patients were included. Patients' ages ranged from 17 to 68 years, with 102 males and 12 females. The most common fracture in this study was found to be zygomatic complex fractures (52%), and RTA was identified as the main cause of fracture in this study (79.2%).

Conclusion:

The midface fractures are more common in males due to the propensity of males to use two-wheelers more than females. The prominence of the zygoma makes it more vulnerable to fractures than rest of the bones in the midface. Increased speed of vehicles and lack of discipline in following traffic rules have resulted in RTA, being the biggest etiological factor in midface injuries.

Study of Patterns of Maxillofacial Injuries: An Institution-based Observational Study

Maxillofacial fractures are one of the common presentations in an emergency department. They are considered to be one of the significant and dominant conditions that requires treatment as the fractures can result in morbidity, mortality, psychological, functional disability, and facial mutilation. The incidence, patterns, and etiology of maxillofacial fractures vary from one country to another due to the geographical, cultural, social, and economic differences. The present study included 176 patients from January 2019 to September 2020 that aimed to evaluate the pattern of maxillofacial fractures and to learn the etiology for the same.