Deprivation and incidence of epilepsy in children

Assessing the extent and determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in epilepsy in the UK: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic inequalities in epilepsy incidence and its adverse outcomes are documented internationally, yet the extent of inequalities and factors influencing the association can differ between countries. A UK public health response to epilepsy, which prevents epilepsy without widening inequalities, is required. However, the data on UK epilepsy inequalities have not been synthesised in a review and the underlying determinants are unknown.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched six bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus) and grey literature published between Jan 1, 1980, and Feb 21, 2024, to identify UK studies reporting epilepsy incidence or epilepsy-related adverse outcomes by socioeconomic factors (individual level or area level). We included longitudinal cohort studies, studies using routinely collected health-care data, cross-sectional studies, and matched cohort studies and excluded conference abstracts and studies not reporting empirical results in the review and meta-analysis. Multiple reviewers (KJB, EC, SER, WOP, and RHT) independently screened studies, KJB extracted data from included studies and a second reviewer (SM or EC) checked data extraction. We used Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists to assess quality. We used random-effects meta-analysis to pool incident rate ratios (IRRs) and synthesised results on adverse outcomes narratively. This study was registered on PROPSPERO (CRD42023394143).

FINDINGS

We identified 2471 unique studies from database searches. We included 26 studies, ten of which reported epilepsy incidence and 16 reported epilepsy-related adverse outcomes according to socioeconomic factors. Misclassification, participation, and interpretive biases were identified as study quality limitations. Meta-analyses showed an association between socioeconomic deprivation and epilepsy incidence, with greater risks of epilepsy incidence in groups of high-deprivation (IRR 1·34 [95% CI 1·16-1·56]; I2=85%) and medium-deprivation (IRR 1·23 [95% CI 1·08-1·39]; I2=63%) compared with low-deprivation groups. This association persisted in the studies that only included children (high vs low: IRR 1·36 [95% CI 1·19-1·57]; I2=0%). Only two studies examined factors influencing epilepsy incidence. There is limited evidence regarding UK inequalities in adverse outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Socioeconomic inequalities in epilepsy incidence are evident in the UK. To develop an evidence-based public health response to epilepsy, further research is needed to understand the populations affected, factors determining the association, and the extent of inequalities in adverse outcomes.

FUNDING

Epilepsy Research Institute UK.

Association between social deprivation and incidence of first seizures and epilepsy: a prospective population based cohort

OBJECTIVE

Epidemiologic studies have investigated whether social deprivation is associated with a higher incidence of epilepsy and results are conflicting, especially in children. The mechanisms underlying a potential association are unclear. This study examines whether there is an association between social deprivation and the incidence of first seizures (unprovoked and provoked) and new diagnosis of epilepsy by comparing incidence across an area-level measure of deprivation in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

Multiple methods of case identification followed by individual case validation and classification were carried out in a defined geographical area (population 542,868) to identify all incident cases of first provoked and first unprovoked seizures and new diagnosis of epilepsy presenting during the calendar year 2017. An area-level relative deprivation index, based on ten indicators from census data, was assigned to each patient according to registered address and categorised into quintiles from most to least deprived.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of first unprovoked seizures (n=372), first provoked seizures (n=189) and new diagnosis of epilepsy (n=336) was highest in the most deprived areas compared to the least deprived areas (incidence ratios of 1·79 (95%CI 1·26, 2·52), 1·55 (95%CI 1·04, 2·32) and 1·83 (95%CI 1·28, 2·62), respectively). This finding was evident in both adults and children and in those with structural and unknown aetiologies of epilepsy.

SIGNIFICANCE

The incidence of first seizures and new diagnosis of epilepsy is associated with more social deprivation. The reason for this higher incidence is likely multifactorial.

How Parents Cope with the Care of a Child with Epilepsy: Based upon Grounded Theory

Background

Parents of children with seizure face the complicated health issues of their children. Adaptation strategies of parents as major care providers impact not only their handling of stresses on themselves but also children's quality of life. This study investigated the adaptation processes of parents of children with seizure at two educational hospitals affiliated with Kerman University of Medical Sciences in Iran.

Methods

Twenty parents (15 mothers and 5 fathers), and three nurses were selected using purposive sampling method. Data was collected using qualitative semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the method suggested by Corbin and Strauss version 2008. The interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved.

Results

The adaptation process had five phases: “Disbelief, Patience on what happened, change to preserve, acceptance of the current situation, and self- empowerment.” In summary, the parents of children with seizure had a 5-phase adaptation strategy. The core category achieved was “continued efforts of parents to restore calm.”

Conclusion

Properly assessing the stresses' resources on parents of children with seizure is necessary. Informing their adaptation strategies may help medical staff and social services to provide more targeted support and promote the balance of the family function.

Incidence of early-onset epilepsy: A prospective population-based study

PURPOSE

The first five years of life reflect a critical period of development prior to formal education yet few epidemiological studies focus on children with early-onset epilepsy (CWEOE; onset <60 months). This study aimed to determine early-onset epilepsy incidence using a comprehensive case identification strategy, and examined socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnicity as risk factors.

METHODS

Through a prospective, population-based study, newly diagnosed CWEOE from Fife and Lothian, Scotland, were identified using multiple-source, active surveillance capture-recapture between May 2013 and June 2015. Crude, ascertainment-adjusted, age-adjusted, age- and gender-specific, and epilepsy-type incidence rates were determined. Risk ratios (RR) were calculated to examine SES and ethnicity as risk factors.

RESULTS

59 (36 Male) CWEOE were identified. Ascertainment was 98% (95% CI 94-103). Crude annual incidence of epilepsy in children 0-59 months was 60.2 (95% CI 44.8-75.5) per 100,000 per year; ascertainment-adjusted annual incidence was 61.7 (95% CI 46.2-77.3) per year. Cumulative incidence of West Syndrome/Infantile Spasms was 6.7 per 10,000 live births (95% CI 3.6-12.3). Aetiology was unknown in almost two-thirds of CWEOE. Compared to White-British Isles (BI) children, Asian children (RR 2.6 [95% CI 1.2-5.7], p = .02) and White-non-BI children (RR 2.5 [95% CI 1.2-5.2], p = .02) had increased risk. SES was not a risk factor.

CONCLUSION

The high incidence of early-onset epilepsy is similar to previous studies and demonstrates a substantial disease burden. Cause of epilepsy remains unknown in almost two thirds of CWEOE. Ethnicity but not SES affects early-onset epilepsy risk.

An estimation of global volume of surgically treatable epilepsy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, yet its global surgical burden has yet to be characterized. The authors sought to compile the most current epidemiological data to quantify global prevalence and incidence, and estimate global surgically treatable epilepsy. Understanding regional and global epilepsy trends and potential surgical volume is crucial for future policy efforts and resource allocation.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to determine the global incidence, lifetime prevalence, and active prevalence of epilepsy; to estimate surgically treatable epilepsy volume; and to evaluate regional trends by WHO regions and World Bank income levels. Data were extracted from all population-based studies with prespecified methodological quality across all countries and demographics, performed between 1990 and 2016 and indexed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The current and annual new case volumes for surgically treatable epilepsy were derived from global epilepsy prevalence and incidence.

RESULTS

This systematic review yielded 167 articles, across all WHO regions and income levels. Meta-analysis showed a raw global prevalence of lifetime epilepsy of 1099 per 100,000 people, whereas active epilepsy prevalence is slightly lower at 690 per 100,000 people. Global incidence was found to be 62 cases per 100,000 person-years. The meta-analysis predicted 4.6 million new cases of epilepsy annually worldwide, a prevalence of 51.7 million active epilepsy cases, and 82.3 million people with any lifetime epilepsy diagnosis. Differences across WHO regions and country incomes were significant. The authors estimate that currently 10.1 million patients with epilepsy may be surgical treatment candidates, and 1.4 million new surgically treatable epilepsy cases arise annually. The highest prevalences are found in Africa and Latin America, although the highest incidences are reported in the Middle East and Latin America. These regions are primarily low- and middle-income countries; as expected, the highest disease burden falls disproportionately on regions with the fewest healthcare resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding of the global epilepsy burden has evolved as more regions have been studied. This up-to-date worldwide analysis provides the first estimate of surgical epilepsy volume and an updated comprehensive overview of current epidemiological trends. The disproportionate burden of epilepsy on low- and middle-income countries will require targeted diagnostic and treatment efforts to reduce the global disparities in care and cost. Quantifying global epilepsy provides the first step toward restructuring the allocation of healthcare resources as part of global healthcare system strengthening.

Socioeconomic Status and Pediatric Neurologic Disorders: Current Evidence

Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important risk factor for many neurological disorders and a determinant of health outcomes and quality of life, especially for individuals with neurologic disorders and developmental disabilities. This article focuses on the relationship between SES and pediatric epilepsy, cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorder, and intellectual disability. Disparities in the prevalence and long-term impact of SES on functioning in persons with disabilities are observed worldwide. Clinicians can use the information presented in the article to target early identification and interventions for improving outcomes in populations most at risk for these disorders and for poor health, social, and economic outcomes.

Disabling chronic conditions in childhood and socioeconomic disadvantage: a systematic review and meta-analyses of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of socioeconomic disadvantage with the prevalence of childhood disabling chronic conditions in high-income countries.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analyses.

DATA SOURCES

6 electronic databases, relevant websites, reference lists and experts in the field.

STUDY SELECTION

160 observational studies conducted in high-income countries with data on socioeconomic status and disabling chronic conditions in childhood, published between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 2013.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Abstracts were reviewed, full papers obtained, and papers identified for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers. Inclusion decisions were checked by a third reviewer. Where reported, ORs were extracted for low versus high socioeconomic status. For studies reporting raw data but not ORs, ORs were calculated. Narrative analysis was undertaken for studies without data suitable for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

126 studies had data suitable for meta-analysis. ORs for risk estimates were: all-cause disabling chronic conditions 1.72 (95% CI 1.48 to 2.01); psychological disorders 1.88 (95% CI 1.68 to 2.10); intellectual disability 2.41 (95% CI 2.03 to 2.86); activity-limiting asthma 2.20 (95% CI 1.87 to 2.85); cerebral palsy 1.42 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.61); congenital abnormalities 1.41 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.61); epilepsy 1.38 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.59); sensory impairment 1.70 (95% CI 1.39 to 2.07). Heterogeneity was high across most estimates (I(2)>75%). Of the 34 studies without data suitable for meta-analysis, 26 reported results consistent with increased risk associated with low socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that, in high-income countries, childhood disabling chronic conditions are associated with social disadvantage. Although evidence of an association is consistent across different countries, the review provides limited evidence to explain the association; future research, using longitudinal data, will be required to distinguish low socioeconomic status as the cause or consequence of childhood disabling chronic conditions and the aetiological pathways and mechanisms.

Socioeconomic deprivation is an independent risk factor for behavioral problems in children with epilepsy

AIM

The aim of this study was to examine whether socioeconomic deprivation in children with epilepsy (CWE) increases risk for behavioral problems independent of seizure factors.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was done in which parents of children attending a specialist epilepsy clinic were invited to complete a child behavior checklist (CBCL) questionnaire about their child. Medical and sociodemographic data on CWE were obtained through their pediatric neurologists. Home postal code was used to obtain quintiles of Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2012 (SIMD2012) scores for individuals. Lower (1-3) quintiles correspond to higher socioeconomic deprivation. Regression analysis was used to investigate whether a lower quintile was an independent risk factor for scores >63 (significant behavioral problem).

RESULTS

Parents of 87 children (42 male, mean age of 10.5years) were enrolled. Fifty-nine percent had total scores >63. A higher proportion of children from quintiles 1-3 compared to those from quintiles 4-5 had externalizing (49% vs. 25%, p=0.02) and total (54% vs. 30%, p=0.02) scores >63. Adjusted OR of quintiles 1-3 vs. 4-5 for scores >63=14.8, 95% CI=3.0, 68.0. Fewer children with scores >63 and from quintiles 1-3 were known to the child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS) compared to those in quintiles 4-5 (p=0.01).

INTERPRETATION

Socioeconomic deprivation was an independent risk factor for behavioral problems in CWE. Children with epilepsy and behavioral problems who lived in socioeconomically deprived areas received less help.

Addressing the inverse care law: the role of community paediatric services

BACKGROUND

Children's health suffers disproportionately from the effects of poverty. The inverse care law states that those who need care the most are the least likely to receive it. Community paediatricians are well placed to address health inequalities in children.

AIMS

To explore, using routinely collected data, whether we address health inequalities and the inverse care law, particularly for certain conditions targeted by our specialty.

METHODS

Five years of data were analysed, during which health equity audits have led to service changes in order to tackle inequities. The data include postcodes, allowing each child to be assigned to a deprivation quintile, and a range of diagnoses, including five sentinel conditions: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on medication, autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), epilepsy, cerebral palsy and Down's syndrome. This allowed analysis of the caseload by deprivation index for these conditions, comparison with the background population and exploration of time trends.

RESULTS

The number of children on the caseload and their distribution across the quintiles remained stable. The proportion of deprived children (i.e. in the lowest two quintiles) on the caseload over the last five years taken together is 56%, compared to 44% in the background population. The numbers of children with ADHD on medication has almost quadrupled in deprived quintiles and doubled in the least deprived quintile, while the numbers of children with this diagnosis in the most deprived is four times that in the least deprived. Numbers of children with ASD have also increased in each quintile. In contrast, the number of children with epilepsy and cerebral palsy did not show much variation, but those from deprived quintiles made up a greater proportion of the caseload.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine data collection demonstrates that inequalities are addressed using all four quality domains of service provision and sentinel conditions more likely to affect deprived children are targeted. We believe it is possible for all services to collect and analyse data thus with minimal effort, thereby providing a foundation from which to address the inverse care law.

Incidence of epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the pooled incidence of epilepsy from published studies and investigate sources of heterogeneity in the estimates.

METHODS

We searched online databases for incidence studies and used meta-analytic methods to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Thirty-three articles met the entry criteria. The median incidence of epilepsy was 50.4/100,000/year (interquartile range [IQR] 33.6-75.6), while it was 45.0 (IQR 30.3-66.7) for high-income countries and 81.7 (IQR 28.0-239.5) for low- and middle-income countries. Population-based studies had higher incidence estimates than hospital-based studies (p = 0.02) while retrospective study design was associated with lower estimates than prospective studies (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

We provide data that could potentially be used to assess the burden and analyze the trends in incidence of epilepsy. Our results support the need for large population-based incidence studies of epilepsy.

Controlling Seizures in Children: Diazepam or Midazolam? Systematic Review

Introduction

Diazepam is commonly used to treat acute childhood seizures, but difficulty gaining intravenous access and variability of absorption after rectal administration can limit its efficacy. Midazolam is a water soluble benzodiazepine that has a rapid onset of action after intranasal or buccal administration and provides an alternative to diazepam in the control of acute childhood seizures.

Methods

A literature search was performed to identify papers comparing the efficacy and tolerability of midazolam and diazepam in the management of childhood seizures.

Results

Intranasal or buccal midazolam are at least as effective as rectal or intravenous diazepam in controlling acute childhood seizures. In all robust studies reporting a significant difference, time to gain seizure control was shorter in patients treated with midazolam than those treated with diazepam, predominantly due to shorter drug administration time. The incidence of seizure recurrence was lower in patients treated with midazolam than diazepam. Respiratory depression was uncommon in both groups.

Conclusion

Intranasal or buccal midazolam provides a safe, effective and acceptable alternative to intravenous or rectal diazepam in the management of acute childhood seizures.

Disparities in epilepsy: report of a systematic review by the North American Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy

PURPOSE

We undertook a systematic review of the evidence on disparities in epilepsy with a focus on North American data (Canada, United States, and the English-speaking Caribbean).

METHODS

We identified and evaluated: access to and outcomes following medical and surgical treatment, disability, incidence and prevalence, and knowledge and attitudes. An exhaustive search (1965-2007) was done, including: (1) disparities by socioeconomic status (SES), race/ethnicity, age, or education of subgroups of the epilepsy population; or (2) disparities between people with epilepsy (PWE) and healthy people or with other chronic illnesses.

RESULTS

From 1,455 citations, 278 eligible abstracts were identified and 44 articles were reviewed. Comparative research data were scarce in all areas. PWE have been shown to have lower education and employment status; among PWE, differences in access to surgery have been shown by racial/ethnic groups. Aboriginals, women, and children have been shown to differ in use of health resources. Poor compliance has been shown to be associated with lower SES, insufficient insurance, poor relationship with treating clinicians, and not having regular responsibilities.

DISCUSSION

Comprehensive, comparative research on all aspects of disparities in epilepsy is needed to understand the causes of disparities and the development of any policies aimed at addressing health disparities and minimizing their impact.

Socioeconomic deprivation independent of ethnicity increases status epilepticus risk

BACKGROUND

A higher incidence of convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) has been reported in nonwhite compared to white populations. Socioeconomic factors can be intricately involved in observed ethnic "effects," and the importance of socioeconomic status on health conditions is widely recognized. Understanding the effect of socioeconomic factors on CSE would provide insights into etiology and management, leading to the development of novel prevention strategies.

METHODS

From a population-based UK study on childhood CSE, we tested the hypothesis that socioeconomic deprivation independent of ethnicity increases the risk of childhood CSE. Home postal codes were used to measure the socioeconomic status of the neighborhood in which patients lived relative to that of the borough in which the neighborhood was located. The child's ethnicity was reported by parent(s). Relationships between socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and incidence were investigated using Poisson regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 176 children were enrolled. The incidence of CSE in nonwhite children [18.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.7-23.3/100,000/year] was 1.8 (95% CI 1.3-2.4) times greater than for white children (10.5, 95% CI 7.9-13.1/100,000/year) (p < 0.0005). Socioeconomic deprivation and Asian ethnicity were independently associated with increased incidence. For each point increase in Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2004, there was a 1.03 cumulative increased relative risk (95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.007). Asian children were 5.7 times (95% CI 1.7-18.9) more likely than white children to have a first-ever episode of CSE (p = 0.004). Socioeconomic and ethnicity effects were related to etiology of CSE.

INTERPRETATION

Ethnic and socioeconomic factors independently affect risk for prolonged febrile seizures and acute symptomatic CSE, but not for other types of childhood CSE.