1
|
Zhou DJ, Pavuluri S, Snehal I, Schmidt CM, Situ-Kcomt M, Taraschenko O. Movement disorders associated with antiseizure medications: A systematic review. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 131:108693. [PMID: 35483204 PMCID: PMC9596228 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
New-onset movement disorders have been frequently reported in association with the use of antiseizure medications (ASMs). The frequency of specific motor manifestations and the spectrum of their semiology for various ASMs have not been well characterized. We carried out a systematic review of literature and conducted a search on CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus from inception to April 2021. We compiled the data for all currently available ASMs using the conventional terminology of movement disorders. Among 5123 manuscripts identified by the search, 437 met the inclusion criteria. The largest number of reports of abnormal movements were in association with phenobarbital, valproic acid, lacosamide, and perampanel, and predominantly included tremor and ataxia. The majority of attempted interventions for all agents were discontinuation of the offending drug or dose reduction which led to the resolution of symptoms in most patients. Familiarity with the movement disorder phenomenology previously encountered in relation with specific ASMs facilitates early recognition of adverse effects and timely institution of targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Zhou
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Spriha Pavuluri
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Isha Snehal
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Cynthia M Schmidt
- Leon S. McGoogan Health Sciences Library, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Miguel Situ-Kcomt
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Olga Taraschenko
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Magalhães LM, Costa R, Vieira M, Moreira J, Gama H, Soares-da-Silva P. Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Elderly Versus Non-Elderly Patients with Focal Seizures: From Pooled Data of Clinical Studies to 8 Years of Post-Marketing Experience. Drug Saf 2021; 44:1099-1107. [PMID: 34536187 PMCID: PMC8473370 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01097-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The prevalence of epilepsy increases in elderly patients aged > 65 years, and treatment is challenging because clinical data are limited. Objective Our objective was to evaluate the safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in patients aged ≥ 65 years versus non-elderly patients with focal seizures. Methods The safety data of seven phase II and III, double-blind, open-label, randomized clinical studies of ESL in adults were pooled. At least possibly related treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) and ESL post-marketing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were analyzed separately by age categories. Results The most frequently reported at least possibly related TEAEs in elderly (N = 120) versus non-elderly patients (N = 1863) were dizziness (10.8 vs. 20.3%), somnolence (9.2 vs. 12.6%), and hyponatremia (6.7 vs. 1.5%). Elderly patients presented a higher incidence of serious TEAEs (22.5 vs. 7.6%) and at least possibly related serious TEAEs (6.7 vs. 2.5%), probably because treatment was complicated by comorbidities and comedications. After an estimated cumulative exposure of over 2 million patient-months worldwide and 8 years of post-marketing surveillance, hyponatremia was the most frequently reported ADR (n = 232), accounting for 14.6% and 6.8% of the ADRs reported in elderly (n = 473) and non-elderly patients (n = 2406), respectively. This was followed by ADR/safety information such as drug–dose titration not performed (7.0 vs. 5.4%), product use in unapproved indication (4.9 vs. 1.9%), off-label use (3.4 vs. 2.2%), dizziness (3.4 vs. 3.5%), and seizure (2.1 vs. 5.8%). Conclusion No specific safety issue was identified from the pooled studies for elderly compared with non-elderly patients. After 8 years of post-marketing surveillance, the qualitative safety of ESL remains similar to that observed in the clinical studies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40264-021-01097-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luís M Magalhães
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
| | - Raquel Costa
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Mariana Vieira
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Joana Moreira
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Helena Gama
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Patrício Soares-da-Silva
- Division of Research and Development, Bial-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745‑457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.,Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,MedInUP‑Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rohracher A, Kalss G, Kuchukhidze G, Neuray C, Leitinger M, Höfler J, Kreidenhuber R, Rossini F, Volna K, Mauritz M, Poppert N, Lattanzi S, Brigo F, Trinka E. New anti-seizure medication for elderly epilepsy patients - a critical narrative review. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 22:621-634. [PMID: 33111598 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1843636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The number of elderly patients with epilepsy is growing in resource rich countries due to demographic changes and increased longevity. Management in these patients is challenging as underlying etiology, co-morbidities, polypharmacy, age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes need to be considered.Areas covered: Lacosamide, eslicarbazepine acetate, brivaracetam, and perampanel have been approved in the USA and Europe for monotherapy and/or adjunctive treatment of seizures in the last few years. The authors review the pharmacological properties and safety profile of these drugs and provide recommendations for their use in in the elderly.Expert opinion: There are only limited data available on more recent antiseizure medications (ASMs). Drugs with a low risk of interaction (lacosamide, brivaracetam) are preferred choices. Once daily formulations (perampanel and eslicarbazepine acetate) have the advantage of increased compliance. Intravenous formulations (brivaracetam and lacosamide) are useful in emergency situations and in patients who have difficulties to swallow. Dose adjustments are necessary for all ASMs used in the elderly with slow titration and lower target doses than in the regulatory trials. The adverse event profile does not significantly differ from that found in the general adult population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rohracher
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - G Kalss
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - G Kuchukhidze
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - C Neuray
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - M Leitinger
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - J Höfler
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - R Kreidenhuber
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - F Rossini
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - K Volna
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - M Mauritz
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - N Poppert
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| | - S Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - F Brigo
- Department of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Meran, Italy
| | - E Trinka
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the ERN EpiCARE Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, and Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zoccarato M, Basile AM, Padovan M, Caccese M, Zagonel V, Lombardi G. Eslicarbazepine in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy: a single-center experience. Int J Neurosci 2020; 131:879-884. [PMID: 32316814 DOI: 10.1080/00207454.2020.1759590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is frequent in patients affected with glioma. Most patients have refractory seizures and require polytherapy. Promising treatment options derive from the development of novel anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), like Eslicarbazepine (ESL), whose role in BTRE has not yet been explored. Our aim was to report a retrospective cohort of patients affected by BTRE treated with ESL as an adjunctive therapy and to discuss the potential role of this third-generation AED in this clinical context. METHODS We analyzed a single-center, retrospectively collected cohort of patients affected by glioma and BTRE, treated with ESL as an adjunctive therapy. RESULTS Analysis included 5 males and 3 females with age ranging from 37 to 75 years (mean = 55.5). Mean baseline Karnofsky performance status was 87.5 (range 70-100). Patients were affected by diffuse astrocytoma (3), low grade oligodendroglioma (2), anaplastic glioma (2) and glioblastoma (1). Mean follow-up was 19 months (range 6-59). Mean dose at the last follow-up was 950 mg daily. Mean weekly seizures in the month before initiation of ESL numbered 17.6 (range 0.25-50). At the last follow-up, mean weekly seizures were 2.2 (range 0-10), i.e. significantly lower than baseline (p = 0.03). The mean reduction of seizures achieved after introduction of ESL was 65%, with 6/8 patients (75%) showing a reduction of more than 50%. Two patients (25%) were seizure free. CONCLUSIONS This single-center experience suggests that ESL may be a well-tolerated, efficacious option as an add-on drug in the treatment of BTRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Zoccarato
- Neurology Unit, O.S.A., Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Marta Padovan
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Mario Caccese
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Vittorina Zagonel
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giráldez BG, Garamendi‐Ruiz I, Zurita J, García A, Querol R, Campos D, Cabeza‐Alvarez C, Serrano P, López‐González FJ, Molins A, Serratosa JM. Clinical outcomes of eslicarbazepine acetate monotherapy for focal-onset seizures: A multicenter audit. Acta Neurol Scand 2019; 140:422-428. [PMID: 31498422 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2019] [Revised: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal-onset seizures. METHODS Multicenter, retrospective, observational study conducted in patients older than 16 years treated with ESL as first-line monotherapy or converted to ESL monotherapy from polytherapy or other monotherapy. Outcomes included 1-year retention rate, seizure-free rates after 6 and 12 months of monotherapy treatment, and safety/tolerability issues. RESULTS A total of 256 patients were included (106 first-line and 150 conversion to monotherapy; 56 patients aged >65 years). Overall, the 1-year retention rate was 79% (72.7% in the ≥65 years subgroup) and seizure-free rates at 6 and 12 months were 59.3% and 55.3% (72.2% and 67.3% in the ≥65 years subgroup), without significant differences when comparing first-line vs conversion-to-ESL monotherapy groups (P = .979). However, the conversion group was heterogeneous and included 43 (29.1%) patients that were seizure free the year prior ESL introduction. A substantially higher proportion of patients remained seizure free for the entire follow-up among those who initiated ESL due to tolerability problems compared with those treated due to inadequate seizure control (71.4% vs 37.3%). Overall, 62 of 256 (24.2%) patients reported AEs (39.3% in >65 years subgroup) and led to discontinuation in 20/256 (7.8%) patients (12.5% in >65 years subgroup). Commonly reported AEs were somnolence (6.6%), dizziness (6.3%), and headache (4.3%). Hyponatremia was recorded in five patients, the majority (4/5) of whom were older than 65 years. CONCLUSIONS Eslicarbazepine acetate was effective and well-tolerated as first-line or conversion to monotherapy in a clinical setting in adult and elderly patients with focal-onset seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jorge Zurita
- Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor Madrid Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Pedro Serrano
- Instituto de Investigación Biomédica (IBIMA) Hospital Regional Universitario Málaga Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang Z, Xu G, Zhan X, Liu Y, Gao Y, Chen N, Guo Y, Li R, He T, Song X, Niu M, Wang J, Bai Z, Xiao X. Carbamazepine promotes specific stimuli-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation and causes idiosyncratic liver injury in mice. Arch Toxicol 2019; 93:3585-3599. [PMID: 31677073 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-019-02606-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The occurrence of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is a leading cause of post-marketing safety warnings and withdrawals of drugs. Carbamazepine (CBZ), widely used as an antiepileptic agent, could cause rare but severe idiosyncratic liver injury in humans. Although recent studies have shown that inflammasome is implicated in CBZ-induced hepatocellular injury in vitro, the precise pathogenesis of hepatotoxicity remains largely unexplored. Here we report that CBZ causes idiosyncratic liver injury through promoting specific stimuli-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation. CBZ (40 μM) enhances NLRP3 inflammasome activation triggered by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) or nigericin, rather than SiO2, monosodium urate crystal or intracellular lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In addition, CBZ has no effect on NLRC4 or AIM2 inflammasome activation. Mechanistically, synergistic induction of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) is a crucial event in the enhancement effect of CBZ on ATP- or nigericin-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Moreover, the "C=C" on the seven-membered ring and "C=O" on the nitrogen of CBZ may be contribute to NLRP3 inflammasome hyperactivation and hepatotoxicity. Notably, in vivo data indicate that CBZ (50 mg/kg) causes liver injury in an LPS (2 mg/kg)-mediated susceptibility mouse model of IDILI, accompanied by an increase in caspase-1 activity and IL-1β production, whereas the combination of CBZ and LPS does not exhibit the effect in NLRP3-knockout mice. In conclusion, CBZ specifically promotes ATP- or nigericin-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation and causes idiosyncratic liver injury. Our findings also suggest that CBZ may be avoided in patients with NLRP3 inflammasome activation-related diseases that are triggered by ATP or nigericin, which may be risk factors for IDILI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhilei Wang
- China Military Institute of Chinese Materia, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
- School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China
| | - Guang Xu
- China Military Institute of Chinese Materia, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Xiaoyan Zhan
- China Military Institute of Chinese Materia, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Youping Liu
- School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China
| | - Yuan Gao
- School of Chinese Materia Medica, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Nian Chen
- School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China
| | - Yuming Guo
- China Military Institute of Chinese Materia, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Ruisheng Li
- Research Center for Clinical and Translational Medicine, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Tingting He
- Integrative Medical Center, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Xueai Song
- Integrative Medical Center, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Ming Niu
- China Military Institute of Chinese Materia, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Jiabo Wang
- China Military Institute of Chinese Materia, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China
| | - Zhaofang Bai
- China Military Institute of Chinese Materia, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China.
- Integrative Medical Center, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China.
| | - Xiaohe Xiao
- China Military Institute of Chinese Materia, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China.
- School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 611137, China.
- Integrative Medical Center, The Fifth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100039, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Watkins L, O'Dwyer M, Shankar R. New anti-seizure medication for elderly epileptic patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:1601-1608. [PMID: 31112437 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1618272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Epilepsy treatment in older people requires specific consideration owing to more physical co-morbidities, the risk of drug-to-drug interactions through polypharmacy, and differences in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. There are many 'newer' antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) widely used for various seizure types and seizure disorders. However, there is limited specific evidence for the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these treatments in the elderly population. Areas covered: This review summarises the current most robust evidence available for the use of the newer AEDs belonging to generation two and three in elderly people with epilepsy. The article provides practical evidenced based clinical information to help prescribers choose the most appropriate AED from the drugs discussed. Expert opinion: Diagnosing new onset epilepsy in the elderly population requires specialist assessment. Treatment plans need to be tailored to accommodate an individual's co-morbidities, concurrent medications, and general health status. To date, few clinical investigations consider the elderly population specifically despite the increased risk factors. There is a need for large quality trial data to assess the impact of the newest AEDs on seizure control and quality of life in this population with complex needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lance Watkins
- Neath Port Talbot CLDT, Mental Health & Learning Disability Delivery Unit, Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board, LLwyneryr Unit , Morriston , UK
| | - Máire O'Dwyer
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland
| | - Rohit Shankar
- Developmental Neuropsychiatry Department, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust , Truro , UK.,Exeter Medical School, Knowledge Spa, Royal Cornwall Hospital , Truro , UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Effectiveness and Safety/Tolerability of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in Epilepsy Patients Aged ≥ 60 Versus < 60 Years: A Subanalysis from the Euro-Esli Study. Neurol Ther 2019; 8:491-504. [PMID: 31098888 PMCID: PMC6858887 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-019-0137-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Clinical practice studies help guide antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in patient groups routinely excluded from clinical trials, such as the elderly. The Euro-Esli study investigated the effectiveness and safety/tolerability of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) when used in everyday clinical practice in Europe. A subanalysis of data from elderly patients (≥ 60 years) included in the Euro-Esli study was conducted to assess these aspects of ESL use in this population. Methods Euro-Esli was a pooled analysis of 14 European clinical practice studies. Effectiveness parameters included responder (≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction) and seizure freedom rates after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment and at last visit. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the follow-up by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and ESL discontinuation due to AEs, respectively. Data were compared for patients aged ≥ 60 versus those aged < 60 years at study entry. Results Euro-Esli included 2058 patients (mean age 44.0 years). Age at study entry was known for 2057 patients, of whom 358 (17.4%) and 1699 (82.6%) were aged ≥ 60 and < 60 years, respectively. Mean maximum ESL dose was 882.0 and 1008.2 mg/day in patients aged ≥ 60 and < 60 years, respectively (p < 0.001). At all timepoints, responder and seizure freedom rates were significantly higher in patients aged ≥ 60 versus < 60 years; for example, at 12 months, responder rates were 83.9 and 73.7%, respectively (p = 0.002), and seizure freedom rates were 58.5 and 37.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of AEs was significantly higher in patients aged ≥ 60 versus < 60 years (41.4 vs. 32.5%; p = 0.001), but the rate of discontinuation due to AEs was comparable between age groups (16.2 vs 13.1%; p = not significant). The safety/tolerability of ESL in patients aged ≥ 60 years was consistent with its known profile. Conclusion Eslicarbazepine acetate was efficacious and generally well tolerated when used to treat elderly patients with focal epilepsy in clinical practice, with no new or unexpected safety signals emerging in this setting. Funding Eisai Ltd.
Collapse
|
9
|
Costa R, Steinhoff B, Gama H, Ikedo F, Rocha JF, Soares-da-Silva P. Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients Aged ≥ 65 Years with Focal Seizures. Drugs Aging 2018; 35:1109-1117. [PMID: 30387043 PMCID: PMC6267536 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0602-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of epilepsy is high within the first few years of life, stabilizes over the second through fifth decades, and then rises again. Treatment of elderly patients with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is complicated by increased sensitivity to drug effects, altered pharmacokinetics and an increased risk for drug interactions due to polytherapy. On the other hand, the safety and efficacy data of AEDs attained during clinical development programmes are relatively limited for this age group. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy in patients aged ≥ 65 years with focal-onset seizures (FOS). METHODS This was an international, multicentre, open-label, non-controlled, single-arm, post-European approval commitment study with flexible doses of ESL between 400 and 1200 mg/day. Seventy-two elderly patients with at least two FOS in the prior 4 weeks, and treated with one or two AEDs, were enrolled. The study consisted of an 8-week baseline, followed by a 26-week treatment period during which the investigator was allowed to up- or down-titrate the ESL dose, and a 4-week follow-up period. Safety and tolerability were assessed as well as mental sedation, cognitive mental state and suicidal ideation. Efficacy was assessed based on patient diaries regarding the absolute and relative changes in seizure frequency, change in intellectual impairment and quality of life. RESULTS Overall, 47 (65.3%) patients experienced 152 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The most frequent were dizziness (12.5%), somnolence (9.7%), fatigue, convulsion and hyponatraemia (8.3% each). All patients that experienced hyponatraemia (6/72) recovered without sequelae. Three patients died during the study (due to cardiac failure, glioblastoma multiforme and ischaemic stroke, all considered unrelated to ESL). Overall, 16 (22.2%) patients discontinued prematurely due to TEAEs. The incidences of clinically significant findings were low for vital signs, ECG, physical and neurological examinations. No TEAEs of hypothyroidism were reported; however, 24 (33.3%) patients presented post-baseline shifts from normal to decreased free T4 levels (not clinically significant). ESL decreased standardized seizure frequency from a mean of 4.8 seizures at baseline to 3.6 seizures at endpoint (p > 0.05); and mean number of days with seizures significantly decreased from 4.1 (baseline) to 2.8 at endpoint (p = 0.0408). CONCLUSION ESL taken once daily (400-1200 mg) as adjunctive therapy in patients aged ≥ 65 years was found to be safe, well tolerated and efficacious (EudraCT number: 2009-012587-14).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Costa
- Department of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | | | - Helena Gama
- Department of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Fábio Ikedo
- Department of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - José-Francisco Rocha
- Department of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal
| | - Patrício Soares-da-Silva
- Department of Research and Development, BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A., À Avenida da Siderurgia Nacional, 4745-457, Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal.
- Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
- MedInUP-Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Carbamazepine (CBZ), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) belong to the dibenzazepine family of antiepileptic drugs and are all thought to primarily act as sodium channel blockers (SCBs). However, ESL is structurally distinct from CBZ and OXC, resulting in differences in metabolism, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Despite a lack of direct comparative data, evidence for potential differences in effectiveness and tolerability within the dibenzazepine family has emerged from studies in which patients being treated with one dibenzazepine agent have received adjunctive treatment with another (having achieved insufficient seizure control with the first) or have transitioned from one dibenzazepine agent to another because of lack of effectiveness or poor tolerability. Most of these studies have been conducted in the real-world clinical practice setting. ESL has been shown to be effective as adjunctive therapy in patients who have previously achieved inadequate seizure control with CBZ, indicating that the use of different dibenzazepine agents in combination can provide additive effectiveness benefits, which may reflect underlying differences in their mechanisms of action. Similarly, ESL monotherapy can be effective in patients who have switched from another dibenzazepine, such as CBZ or OXC, because of inadequate efficacy. There is also considerable evidence to demonstrate that patients transitioning from OXC or CBZ to ESL as a result of adverse events experience improvements in tolerability, which may also be associated with improvements in quality of life, alertness, and/or lipid profiles. Current evidence therefore demonstrates that ESL differs from other dibenzazepine agents in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. Funding: Eisai Ltd.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lattanzi S, Brigo F, Cagnetti C, Verrotti A, Zaccara G, Silvestrini M. Eslicarbazepine acetate in the treatment of adults with partial-onset epilepsy: an evidence-based review of efficacy, safety and place in therapy. CORE EVIDENCE 2018; 13:21-31. [PMID: 29563858 PMCID: PMC5846310 DOI: 10.2147/ce.s142858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Up to 30% of the patients diagnosed with epilepsy will continue suffering from seizures despite treatment with antiepileptic drugs, either in monotherapy or polytherapy. Hence, there remains the need to develop new effective and well-tolerated therapies. AIM The objective of this article was to review the evidence for the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive treatment in adult patients with focal onset seizures. EVIDENCE REVIEW ESL is the newest, third-generation, single enantiomer member of the dibenzazepine family. Following oral administration, ESL is rapidly and extensively metabolized by hepatic first-pass hydrolysis to the active metabolite eslicarbazepine, which has linear, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and low potential for drug-drug interactions. Eslicarbazepine works as a competitive blocker of the voltage gated sodium channels; unlike carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC), it has a lower affinity for the resting state of the channels, and reduces their availability by selectively enhancing slow inactivation. Efficacy and safety of ESL have been assessed in four randomized, Phase III clinical trials: the median relative reduction in standardized seizure frequency was 33.4% and 37.8% in the ESL 800 and 1,200 mg daily dose groups, and the responder rates were 33.8% and 43.1%, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) increased with raising the dosage (ESL 400 mg: 63.8%, ESL 800 mg: 67.0%, ESL 1,200 mg: 73.1%). The TEAEs were generally mild to moderate in intensity, and the most common were dizziness, somnolence, headache and nausea. Open-label studies confirmed the findings from the pivotal trials and demonstrated sustained therapeutic effect of ESL over time and improvement of tolerability profile in patients switching from OXC/CBZ. No unexpected safety signals emerged over >5 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION Once-daily adjunctive ESL at the doses of 800 and 1,200 mg was effective to reduce the seizure frequency and was fairly well tolerated in adults with focal onset epilepsy. Starting treatment at 400 mg/day, followed by 400 mg increments every 7-14 days, could provide the optimal balance of efficacy and tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesco Brigo
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, Italy
- Division of Neurology, “Franz Tappeiner” Hospital, Merano BZ, Italy
| | - Claudia Cagnetti
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alberto Verrotti
- Department of Pediatrics, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Gaetano Zaccara
- Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Usl Centro Toscana Health Authority, Firenze, Italy
| | - Mauro Silvestrini
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Willems LM, Zöllner JP, Paule E, Schubert-Bast S, Rosenow F, Strzelczyk A. Eslicarbazepine acetate in epilepsies with focal and secondary generalised seizures: systematic review of current evidence. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2017; 11:309-324. [PMID: 29285947 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1421066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for adjunctive treatment in adults, children, and adolescents with focal-onset seizures. Recently ESL was approved for initial monotherapy in adults. The intention of this article is to review current evidence for ESL and to summarise its pharmacological profile in comparison to other AEDs of the dibenzazepine group. Areas covered: We performed a systematic literature search in electronic databases (MEDLINE database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Excerpta Medica dataBASE) using a combined search strategy including the following keywords: eslicarbazepine, epilepsy and seizure. The search was performed from 2000 until December 2017. Using a standardised assessment form, information on the study design, methodological framework, data sources and efficacy and adverse events attributed to ESL were extracted from each publication and systematically reported. Expert commentary: ESL is an effective, safe and well tolerated third-generation AED for the treatment of focal epilepsies. During therapy, especially serum sodium levels and possible interactions with other substances have to be monitored. As of yet, long-term experience is still needed to make severe late-occurring adverse events unlikely and to obtain data regarding its use in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent M Willems
- a Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main and Department of Neurology , Goethe-University , Frankfurt am Main , Germany
| | - Johann Philipp Zöllner
- a Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main and Department of Neurology , Goethe-University , Frankfurt am Main , Germany
| | - Esther Paule
- a Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main and Department of Neurology , Goethe-University , Frankfurt am Main , Germany
| | - Susanne Schubert-Bast
- a Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main and Department of Neurology , Goethe-University , Frankfurt am Main , Germany.,c Department of Neuropediatrics , Goethe-University , Frankfurt am Main , Germany
| | - Felix Rosenow
- a Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main and Department of Neurology , Goethe-University , Frankfurt am Main , Germany.,b Epilepsy Center Hessen and Department of Neurology , Philipps-University , Marburg , Germany
| | - Adam Strzelczyk
- a Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main and Department of Neurology , Goethe-University , Frankfurt am Main , Germany.,b Epilepsy Center Hessen and Department of Neurology , Philipps-University , Marburg , Germany
| |
Collapse
|