1
|
Cornejo J, Zevallos A, Sarmiento J, Shojaeian F, Mokhtari-Esbuie F, Adrales G, Li C, Sebastian R. Increased staple line leak rates following re-sleeve: analysis comparing re-sleeve versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion and primary sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:5368-5376. [PMID: 39037465 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11046-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common bariatric procedure and its long-term complications include inadequate weight loss, weight regain, and de novo GERD, often requiring revisional surgery. Revisions, notably re-sleeve and conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), are frequently performed, but safety data is limited. Herein, we used the MBSAQIP database to compare 30 day outcomes of primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with re-sleeve (RS) and SG to RYGB conversion. METHODS Patients who underwent primary SG, RS, and SG to RYGB conversion within the MBSAQIP data registry from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022 were included in this study. Using Propensity Score Matching analysis, the cohorts were matched for 23 preoperative characteristics. We then compared 30 day postoperative outcomes and bariatric-specific complications between primary SG and RS (analysis 1) and between RS and SG to RYGB conversion (analysis 2). RESULTS A total of 302,961 were included. The matched cohorts in analysis 1 (n = 1630) and analysis 2 (n = 1633) had similar pre-operative characteristics. Propensity-matched outcomes in analysis 1 showed that patients in the RS group had significantly higher staple line leak (1.3% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001) when compared to primary SG. Similarly, longer operative times (90.16 ± 51.90 min vs. 68.32 ± 37.54 min, p < 0.001) and higher rates of readmissions (5.5% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001), reoperations (2.3% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001), interventions (2.5% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001) were found in those who underwent RS. In analysis 2, RS showed higher leak rates (1.3% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.015) when compared to conversion from SG to RYGB. CONCLUSION The RS group has a higher risk of staple line leaks compared to primary SG and conversion from SG to RYGB. In our study, there was a 2.6-fold increase in staple line leak after re-sleeve compared to RYGB conversion and a 13-fold increase compared to primary SG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Cornejo
- Department of Surgery, Northwest Hospital, 5401 Old Court Road, Randallstown, MD, 21133, USA
| | - Alba Zevallos
- Department of Surgery, Northwest Hospital, 5401 Old Court Road, Randallstown, MD, 21133, USA
- Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru
| | - Joaquin Sarmiento
- Department of Surgery, Northwest Hospital, 5401 Old Court Road, Randallstown, MD, 21133, USA
| | - Fatemeh Shojaeian
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Gina Adrales
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christina Li
- Department of Surgery, Northwest Hospital, 5401 Old Court Road, Randallstown, MD, 21133, USA
| | - Raul Sebastian
- Department of Surgery, Northwest Hospital, 5401 Old Court Road, Randallstown, MD, 21133, USA.
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wisniowski P, Samakar K, Cheng V, Hawley L, Abel S, Nguyen J, Dobrowolsky A, Martin M. Safety of redo sleeve gastrectomy as a primary revisional procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024:S1550-7289(24)00172-2. [PMID: 38871494 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insufficient weight loss after primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) occasionally requires revisional surgery. A few single-institution studies have examined the safety of redo LSG (RSG) and have shown mixed results. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of RSG compared with LSG over a period of 30 days. SETTING University of Southern California, United States; Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. METHODS The 2020-2021 MBSAQIP registry was used to evaluate patients who underwent RSG. Thirty-day outcomes were evaluated using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic and linear regression. RESULTS A total of 226,029 patients were reviewed, of whom 1454 (.7%) underwent RSG and 224,575 (99.3%) underwent initial LSG. Patients who underwent RSG were older (45 versus 42 yr), predominantly female (86.2% versus 81.3%), had a lower body mass index (40.0 versus 43.4), fewer co-morbidities, and greater rates of gastroesophageal reflux (38.7% versus 25.1%). They demonstrated increased overall complications (3.6% versus 2.1%, P < .001) and a longer operative time (81 versus 62 min, P < .001), but there was no difference in mortality. On multivariable analysis, patients who underwent RSG were independently associated with an increased risk of overall postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.493, P = .018), organ space infection (OR: 6.231, P < .001), staple line leak (OR: 12.838, P < .001), pneumonia (OR: 3.85, P = .013), ventilator requirement over 48 hours (OR: 6.404, P = .035), sepsis (OR: 4.397, P = .010), septic shock (OR: 8.669, P < .001), reoperation (OR: 1.808, P = .013), readmission (OR: 2.104, P < .001), reintervention (OR: 4.435, P < .001), and longer operative times (β = 12.790, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS In this national database study, RSG was associated with increased rates of postoperative complications and a longer operative time. Although these results are concerning, further studies are required to examine long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Wisniowski
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Kamran Samakar
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Vincent Cheng
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Lauren Hawley
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stuart Abel
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - James Nguyen
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Adrian Dobrowolsky
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthew Martin
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sista F, Carandina S, Soprani A, Rivkine E, Montana L, Fiasca F, Cappelli S, Grasso A, Nedelcu M, Tucceri Cimini I, Clementi M. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure: Could the Number of Previous Operations Influence the Outcome? J Clin Med 2024; 13:293. [PMID: 38202300 PMCID: PMC10779909 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
After a failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been proposed as revisional surgery. Those patients that receive a second restrictive procedure fall into a small subgroup of patients with more than one restrictive procedure (MRP). If also the second restrictive procedure fails, the correct surgical strategy is a challenge for the surgeon. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may be an option but there is no evidence in the literature on whether the procedure is effective in treating failures after MRP. This study aims to evaluate the influence of the previous number of restrictive interventions (MRP vs single LSG) in the results of RYGB as revisional surgery. We have retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent conversion from laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), or from multiple restrictive procedures (MRP), to RYGB for weight regain (WR) or insufficient weight loss (IWL) between 2009 and 2019. The number of patients analyzed was 69 with conversion to RYGB after LSG and 44 after MRP. The reduction of excess weight (%TWL) at 3, 6, 12, 24 RYGB postoperative months was respectively of 11.03%, 16.39%, 21.43%, and 24.22% in the MRP group, and of 10.97%, 16.4%, 21.22%, and 22.71% in the LSG group. No significant difference was found in %TWL terms after RYGB for the MRP group and the LSG group with an overall %TWL, which was 11.00 ± 6.03, 16.40 ± 8.08, 21.30 ± 9.43, and 23.30 ± 9.91 respectively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The linear regression model highlighted a positive relationship between the %EWL post-bypass at 24 months and the time elapsed only between the LSG and RYGB in the MRP group patients (p < 0.001). RYGB has proved to be a reliable technique with good results in terms of weight loss after failed bariatric surgery both in patients who previously underwent MRP and in those who underwent exclusively LSG. RYGB showed better results in patients who experienced WR than in those who had IWL from previous techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Sista
- Hepatic Pancreatic and Biliary Surgical Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, Department of Biothecnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Sergio Carandina
- ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre de Chirurgie de l’Obésité (CCO), 83100 Toulon, France
- Department of Digestive and Bariatric Surgery, Clinica Madonna della Salute, 45014 Porto Viro, Italy
| | - Antoine Soprani
- Clinique Geoffroy-Saint Hilaire, Générale de Santé (GDS), Department of Digestive and Bariatric Surgery, 75005 Paris, France;
| | - Emmanuel Rivkine
- Department of Digestive and Bariatric Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique, 97261 Fort-de-France, France
| | - Laura Montana
- Department of Digestive and Metabolic Surgery, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Fabiana Fiasca
- Public Health Unit, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Sonia Cappelli
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Grasso
- General Surgical Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy (I.T.C.)
| | - Marius Nedelcu
- ELSAN, Clinique Saint Michel, Centre de Chirurgie de l’Obésité (CCO), 83100 Toulon, France
- Department of Digestive and Bariatric Surgery, Clinica Madonna della Salute, 45014 Porto Viro, Italy
| | - Irene Tucceri Cimini
- General Surgical Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy (I.T.C.)
| | - Marco Clementi
- General Surgical Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy (I.T.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
El Khoury L, Catheline JM, Taher M, Roussel J, Bendacha Y, Romero R, Dbouk R, Cohen R. Re-sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and sensible intervention in selected patients: retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2023; 109:4145-4150. [PMID: 37707529 PMCID: PMC10720822 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sleeve gastrectomy is a good treatment intervention to control the metabolic syndrome in patients with obesity worldwide. However, weight regain is of great concern and would usually necessitate a reintervention. In recent years, re-sleeve gastrectomy (ReSG) has been proposed to treat weight regain in the context of a large residual stomach. Our objective was to analyze the long-term results and safety profile of this intervention in a large case series. METHODS From September 2010 to March 2021, a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary nonuniversity hospital was performed. Seventy-nine patients received a ReSG by laparoscopy. Preoperative radiologic imaging showed a dilation of the gastric pouch exceeding 250 cc in all cases. RESULTS A total of 79 patients (87% females) with a mean age of 44.8 years old and a mean BMI of 40.0 kg/m 2 were enrolled in the study. The mean follow-up was 44.8 months. The ReSG indication was insufficient weight loss in 37 patients (46.8%) and weight regain in 39 patients (53.2%). The authors noticed a 10.1% complications rate: gastric stenosis (5.1%), bleeding (2.5%), and incisional site hernia in 2.5%, with no death. There was no gastric fistula detected. The mean BMI decreased to 33.1 kg/m 2 after ReSG (a decrease of 6.9 kg/m 2 ). CONCLUSION After insufficient weight loss or weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy and in the presence of localized or global gastric tube dilation, ReSG seems to be a good treatment choice and a safe procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Regis Cohen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Denis, 2 rue du Docteur Delafontaine, Saint-Denis, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dirnberger AS, Süsstrunk J, Schneider R, Poljo A, Klasen JM, Slawik M, Billeter AT, Müller-Stich BP, Peterli R, Kraljević M. Mid-Term Outcomes After Conversion Procedures Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2023; 33:2679-2686. [PMID: 37515694 PMCID: PMC10435413 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06734-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the long term, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may be associated with insufficient weight loss (IWL), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and persistence or relapse of associated medical problems. This study's objective is to present mid-term results regarding weight loss (WL), evolution of associated medical problems, and reoperation rate of patients who underwent a conversion after SG. METHODS Retrospective single-center analysis of patients with a minimal follow-up of 2 years after conversion. RESULTS In this series of 549 SGs, 84 patients (15.3%) underwent a conversion, and 71 met inclusion criteria. They were converted to short biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (short BPL RYGB) (n = 28, 39.4%), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) (n = 19, 26.8%), long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (long BPL RYGB) (n = 17, 23.9%), and re-sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) (n = 7, 9.9%). Indications were GERD (n = 24, 33.8%), IWL (n = 23, 32.4%), IWL + GERD (n = 22, 31.0%), or stenosis/kinking of the sleeve (n = 2, 2.8%). The mean pre-revisional body mass index (BMI) was 38.0 ± 7.5 kg/m2. The mean follow-up time after conversion was 5.1 ± 3.1 years. The overall percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was greatest after BPD/DS (36.6%) and long BPL RYGB (32.9%) compared to RSG (20.0%; p = 0.004; p = 0.049). In case of GERD, conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) led to a resolution of symptoms in 79.5%. 16.9% of patients underwent an additional revisional procedure. CONCLUSION In the event of IWL after SG, conversion to BPD/DS provides a significant and sustainable additional WL. Conversion to RYGB leads to a reliable symptom control in patients suffering from GERD after SG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda S Dirnberger
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Julian Süsstrunk
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Romano Schneider
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adisa Poljo
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer M Klasen
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marc Slawik
- Interdisciplinary Center of Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases, St. Clara Hospital, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Adrian T Billeter
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ralph Peterli
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland.
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Marko Kraljević
- University Digestive Health Care Center Basel - Clarunis, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bonaldi M, Rubicondo C, Giorgi R, Cesana G, Ciccarese F, Uccelli M, Zanoni A, Villa R, De Carli S, Oldani A, Ismail A, Di Capua F, Olmi S. Re-sleeve gastrectomy: weight loss, comorbidities and gerd evaluation in a large series with 5 years of follow-up. Updates Surg 2023:10.1007/s13304-023-01471-1. [PMID: 36849646 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01471-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has rapidly become one of the most commonly performed procedures in bariatric surgery. Weight regain and insufficient weight loss are the most common causes for surgical failure. Re-sleeve gastrectomy (ReSG) can represent an option when there is evidence of a dilated gastric tube. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study is to evaluate safety, efficacy and rate of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) after ReSG in one of the largest series present in literature with long-term follow up. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study design. From February 2010 to August 2018, 102 patients underwent ReSG at our Centre. We divided patients into two groups, according to the main reason for surgical failure: insufficient weight loss or progressive weight regain. RESULTS One hundred-two patients (78 women, 24 men) with BMI 38 ± 6 kg/m2 underwent ReSG (mean age 44 years). Rate of postoperative complications was 3.9% (4/102). After a mean follow-up of 55 months, mean BMI decreased to 30,4 kg/m2 and the mean percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 51 ± 38.6. Symptoms of GERD were present in 35/102 patients (34.3%) and the need for a new operation occurred in six patients. Forty-five patients were submitted to ReSG for progressive weight regain (group A) and 57 for insufficient weight loss (group B). No differences were found in terms of postoperative BMI and %EWL. CONCLUSION ReSG is a feasible procedure after primary SG failure in selected patients, but its efficacy in reducing the BMI under 30 kg/m2 is still unclear. In addition, over 30% of patients suffer from long-term gastro-esophageal reflux.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Bonaldi
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy.
| | - Carolina Rubicondo
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giorgi
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cesana
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Francesca Ciccarese
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Matteo Uccelli
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Adelinda Zanoni
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Roberta Villa
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Stefano De Carli
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Alberto Oldani
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Ayman Ismail
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Capua
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| | - Stefano Olmi
- Division of General and Oncological Surgery and Obesity Center of Policlinico San Marco, Corso Europa, 7, Zingonia, 24040, Osio Sotto, BG, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kolyadko PV, Kolyadko VP, Degovtsov EN, Samoilov VS, Stepanenko AV. [Non-surgical treatment of staple-line suture leakage after redo sleeve gastrectomy]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2023:83-89. [PMID: 36800874 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202303183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Redo bariatric procedures are common. However, redo sleeve gastrectomy is not a frequent case of repeated bariatric surgery and can be performed rather as a necessary measure in difficult intraoperative conditions. We report a patient who underwent laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement, its blockage and surgical removal, sleeve gastrectomy and redo sleeve gastrectomy. After that, staple-line suture failure developed that required endoscopic clipping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P V Kolyadko
- Nizhnevartovsk District Clinical Hospital, Nizhnevartovsk, Russia
| | - V P Kolyadko
- Nizhnevartovsk District Clinical Hospital, Nizhnevartovsk, Russia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Conversion of gastric sleeve to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: overall outcomes and predictors of below-average weight loss. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:111-117. [PMID: 36470814 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been utilized to promote further weight loss, but results are variable in available literature. OBJECTIVES To evaluate outcomes of SG to RYGB conversion for weight loss and to identify predictors of below-average weight loss. SETTING University-affiliated hospital, United States. METHODS Chart review was performed of our patients who underwent SG to RYGB conversion from November 1, 2013, to November 1, 2020. Primary outcomes were below-average percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for preconversion demographics to evaluate their relationship to the primary outcome. RESULTS Sixty-two patients underwent conversion from SG to RYGB with weight loss as a goal. One-year data was available for 47 patients. The average %EWL at 1 year was 41.5%. Twenty-six patients had below-average %EWL at 1 year. Interval to conversion <2 years (OR = 4.41, 95% CI [1.28,15.17], P = .019) and preconversion body mass index (BMI) >40 (OR = 4.00, 95% CI [1.17,13.73], P = .028) were statistically significant predictors of below-average 1-year %EWL. Two-year data was available for 36 patients. The average %EWL at 2 years was 30.8%. Seventeen patients had below-average %EWL at 2 years. Evaluated demographics were not statistically significant predictors of below-average 2-year %EWL. CONCLUSIONS Following SG to RYGB conversion, %EWL outcomes are lower at 1 year (41.5%) and 2 years (30.8%) than reported values for primary RYGB. Interval to conversion <2 years and preconversion BMI >40 are predictors of below-average 1-year weight loss after conversion.
Collapse
|
9
|
Treatment Options for Weight Regain or Insufficient Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2022; 32:2035-2046. [DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06020-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
10
|
Yap RV, Eleazar PJ, Roble Ii VM, Rosello DE. Bariatric Surgery in Cebu, Philippines: Current Status and Initial Experience With Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Cureus 2021; 13:e18953. [PMID: 34815899 PMCID: PMC8605933 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prevalence of obesity in the Philippines has increased more than three-fold over the last two decades. However, bariatric surgery has not been widely adopted yet in the country. Local data mainly on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are limited as well. We report for the first time our experience with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and present the current local status of bariatric surgery in Cebu, Philippines. Patients and methods This is a retrospective study of all patients 18 years old and above who underwent LSG in a single, private, tertiary institution during the period 2009 - 2019. Our primary endpoint was weight loss after LSG. Secondary endpoint was postoperative complications. Results Thirty-three patients (mean age 40.9 ± 14.5 years) underwent LSG. Baseline weight and BMI were 112.6 ± 29 kg and 41.3 ± 8.6, respectively. The mean operative duration was 201 ± 72.9 minutes. The were no open conversions with minimal morbidity. Mean hospital stay was 3.7 ± 0.9 days. The postoperative mean weight and BMI after one year were 68.9 ± 17 kg and 26.6 ± 6, respectively. Overall, mean excess weight loss (EWL) was 61.9 ± 44.1 % at a median follow-up of 5.4 months. Significant weight loss was noted after the third month. Conclusion LSG is a safe and effective method in producing weight loss. It can be a definitive treatment option as local prevalence of obesity is increasing in the Philippines. However, access to and the practice of bariatric surgery remains limited in the country. A collaboration among private and government stakeholders is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralph Victor Yap
- Department of Surgery, Cebu Doctors' University Hospital, Cebu, PHL
| | | | - Vincent Matthew Roble Ii
- Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Cebu Doctors' University Hospital, Cebu, PHL
| | - Don Edward Rosello
- Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Cebu Doctors' University Hospital, Cebu, PHL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yap RV, Eleazar PJ, Roble II VM, Rosello DE. Bariatric Surgery in Cebu, Philippines: Current Status and Initial Experience With Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Cureus 2021. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
|
12
|
Yap RV, Eleazar PJ, Roble II VM, Rosello DE. Bariatric Surgery in Cebu, Philippines: Current Status and Initial Experience With Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Cureus 2021. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
|
13
|
Efficacy and Drawbacks of Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Tertiary Referral Bariatric Center. Obes Surg 2021; 31:2691-2700. [PMID: 33834374 PMCID: PMC8113294 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05323-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background The need for revisional procedures after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for insufficient weight loss or weight regain, gastroesophageal reflux, or other complications is reported to be 18–36% in studies with 10-year follow-up. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) may be performed as a revisional procedure after SG. This study aims to evaluate the short- and mid-term outcomes of SADI after SG in a referral center for bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods Data of patients who underwent SADI between March 2015 and March 2020 were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up comprised clinical and biochemical assessment at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively, and once a year thereafter. Results Overall, 106 patients underwent SADI after a previous SG. The timeframe between SG and SADI was 50 ± 31.3 months. Postoperative mortality was observed in two cases (1.8%) and morbidity in 15.1% of patients. At 24 months, %total weight loss was 37.6 ± 12.3 and %excess weight loss 76.9 ± 25.2 (64 patients). Three patients were treated for malnutrition during follow-up, two with medical treatment and one with SADI reversal. Conclusion SADI after SG provides effective weight loss results in the short-term, even if in the present series the postoperative complication rate was non-negligible. Further trials are needed to establish the more advantageous revisional bariatric procedure after failed SG. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05323-y.
Collapse
|