The impact of health literacy on health status and resource utilization in lumbar degenerative disease

Relationship between health literacy and health-related quality of life in Korean adults with chronic diseases

Inadequate health literacy is a risk factor for poor health outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). So far, the impact of health literacy on HRQoL has been examined for only a few chronic conditions. In this contribution, the relationship between health literacy and HRQoL in Korean adults with chronic conditions is examined using data of the cross-sectional Korea Health Panel Survey from 2021. Health literacy was measured with the 16-item European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16) and HRQoL with the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Multiple linear regression model was run for the EQ-5D index as the dependent variable. Multiple logistic regression models were implemented for responses to the individual EQ-5D items. 30.8%, 24.6%, and 44.6% of participants had inadequate, marginal, and adequate levels of health literacy, respectively. The EQ-5D index increases with marginal (B = 0.018, p<0.001) and adequate literacy (B = 0.017, p<0.001) compared to inadequate literacy. People with adequate or marginal literacy were more likely to report no problem with mobility (odds ration [OR] = 1.5; p<0.001), self-care (OR = 1.6; p<0.05), and usual activities (OR = 1.6 for adequate; OR = 1.4 for marginal; p<0.01) than those with inadequate literacy. Adequate health literacy was associated with an increased likelihood of having no problem with anxiety and depression (OR = 1.4; p<0.05). In conclusion, inadequate health literacy is prevalent among Korean adults with chronic diseases. Adequate health literacy is associated with better HRQoL and a protective factor for four dimensions of EQ-5D (mobility, self-care, usual activities, and anxiety/depression).

Patient expectations impact patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after lumbar fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Prior studies suggest that patient expectations impact postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). However, no consensus exists on an appropriate expectations tool.

PURPOSE

To examine the impact of patient expectations using a modified version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction 1 year after lumbar fusion for degenerative pathologies.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal cohort.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adults undergoing 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion were identified from four tertiaty spine centers.

OUTCOME MEASURES

ODI, EuroQol-5D, Numeric rating scales for back and leg pain.

METHODS

Preoperatively, patients completed the ODI, as well as a modified ODI reflecting their expected improvement across the 10 ODI items. For example, item 1 in the ODI asks about Pain Intensity at the moment whereas the Expectations ODI asks "One year after surgery, I expect to have…" The difference between this modified ODI score and the baseline ODI score (Baseine ODI minus Expectations ODI) was defined as the Patient Expectation Score. Patients were stratified into tertiles based on their Expectations score into High (HE), Moderate (ME), and Low (LE) Expectations and compared.

RESULTS

There were 30 patients in the HE, 35 in the ME, and 26 in the LE Group, with similar demographics and surgical parameters. Patients in the HE group had worse ODI scores preoperatively (54.96 vs 41.42, p<.001) and were expecting a greater improvement in ODI (43.8 vs 13.5, p<.001). There were fewer patients in the HE group (13, 43%) who reported that they were satisfied with the results compared to either the ME (20, 71%) or LE group (22, 85%, p=.041) despite having similar ODI scores and change in ODI scores 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

An expectations tool, linked to a disease-specific measure may provide the clinician with a practical method of assessing a patient's expectation of results after treatment and aid in the shared decision-making during the preoperative surgical process.

Limited health literacy results in lower health-related quality of life in spine patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal conditions impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patient education and counseling improve HRQoL, yet the effects may be limited for patients with inadequate health literacy (HL). Despite the established relationship between HRQoL and HL in other fields, research in the orthopedic spine population is lacking.

PURPOSE

To investigate if limited HL results in lower HRQoL and to evaluate factors are associated with HRQoL in patients seen at an outpatient orthopedic spine center.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Prospective single-center cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients 18 years of age or older seen at a tertiary urban academic hospital- based multi-surgeon outpatient spine center.

OUTCOME MEASURES

EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire, and the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) HL assessment tool.

METHODS

Between October 2022 and February 2023, consecutive English-speaking patients over the age of 18 and new to the outpatient spine clinic were approached for participation in this cross-sectional survey study. Patients completed a sociodemographic survey, EQ-5D-5L HRQoL questionnaire, and Newest Vital Sign (NVS) HL assessment tool. The EQ-5D-5L yields two continuous outcomes: an index score ranging from below 0 to 1 and a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) score ranging from 0 to 100. The NVS scores were divided into limited (0-3) and adequate (4-6) HL. Multivariate linear regression with purposeful selection of variables was performed to identify independent factors associated with HRQoL.

RESULTS

Out of 397 eligible patients, 348 (88%) agreed to participate and were included in statistical analysis. Limited HL was independently associated with lower EQ-5D-5L index scores (B=1.07 [95% CI 1.00-1.15], p=.049. Other factors associated with lower EQ-5D-5L index scores were being obese (BMI≥30), having housing concerns, and being an active smoker. Factors associated with lower EQ-VAS scores were being underweight (BMI<18.5), obese, having housing concerns, and higher updated Charlson comorbidity index (uCCI) scores. Being married was associated with higher EQ-VAS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited HL is associated with lower EQ-5D-5L index scores in spine patients, indicating lower HRQoL. To effectively apply HL-related interventions in this population, a better understanding of the complex interactions between patient characteristics, social determinants of health, and HRQoL outcomes is required. Further research should focus on interventions to improve HRQoL in patients with limited HL and how to accurately identify these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II prognostic.

Health Literacy in Orthopaedics

Health literacy is a dynamic, multifaceted skill set that relies on patients, healthcare providers, and the healthcare system. In addition, health literacy assessment provides an avenue for evaluating patient understanding and offers insights into their health management capabilities. Inadequate health literacy results in poor patient outcomes and compromised care by considerably hindering successful communication and comprehension of relevant health information between the patient and the provider. In this narrative review, we explore why limited health literacy poses serious implications for orthopaedic patient health and safety, expectations, treatment outcomes, and healthcare costs. Furthermore, we elaborate on the complexity of health literacy, provide an overview of key concepts, and offer recommendations for clinical practice and research investigations.

Prevalence of and factors associated with limited health literacy in spine patients

BACKGROUND

Limited health literacy exacerbates health inequity and has serious implications for patient care. It hinders successful communication and comprehension of relevant health information, which can lead to suboptimal care. Despite the evidence regarding the significance of health literacy, the topic has received little consideration in orthopedic spine patients.

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence of and factors associated with limited health literacy among outpatients presenting to a tertiary urban academic hospital-based orthopedic spine center.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectionals.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients 18 years of age or older seen at a tertiary urban academic hospital-based multi-surgeon outpatient spine center.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment.

METHODS

Between December 2021 and March 2022, 447 consecutive English-speaking patients over the age of 18 years and new to the outpatient spine clinic were approached for participation in a cross-sectional survey study, of which 405 agreed to participate. Patients completed the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment tool, the Rapid Estimation of Adult Literacy in Medicine Short Form (REALM-SF), and a sociodemographic survey (including race/ethnicity, level of education, employment status, income, and marital status). The NVS scores were divided into limited (0-3) and adequate (4-6) health literacy. REALM-SF scores were classified into reading levels below ninth grade (0-6) or at least ninth grade (7). Additional demographic data was extracted from patient records. Online mapping tools were used to collect the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) for each patient. Subsequently, multivariable regression modeling was performed to identify independent factors associated with limited health literacy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of limited health literacy in patients presenting to an urban academic outpatient spine center was 33% (135/405). Unadjusted analysis found that patients who were socioeconomically disadvantaged (eg, unemployed, lower household income, publicly insured and higher SVI) and had more unfavorable social determinant of health features (eg, housing concerns, higher ADI, less years of education, below ninth grade reading level, unmarried) had high rates of limited health literacy. Adjusted regression analysis demonstrated that limited health literacy was independently associated with higher ADI state decile, living less than 10 years at current address, having housing concerns, not being employed, non-native English speaking, having less years of education and below ninth grade reading level.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that a substantial portion of the patients presenting to an outpatient spine center have limited health literacy, more so if they are socially disadvantaged. Future efforts should investigate the impact of limited health literacy on access to care, treatment outcomes and health care utilization in orthopedic patients. Neighborhood social vulnerability measures may be a feasible way to identify patients at risk of limited health literacy in clinical practice and offer opportunities for tailored patient care. This may contribute to prioritizing the mitigation of disparities and aid in the development of meaningful interventions to improve health equity in orthopedics.

The relationship between musculoskeletal health literacy and upper extremity patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the setting of atraumatic shoulder pain

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly utilized to assess patient-derived orthopaedic health status and function. The prevalence of limited musculoskeletal health literacy (MHL) has been demonstrated to be high within the orthopaedic literature. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between MHL and upper extremity-specific PROMs and to determine which patient- and symptom-related factors affect baseline PROMs in patients with atraumatic shoulder pain.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients with limited MHL would demonstrate lower median scores on baseline PROMs compared with those with adequate MHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

New patients with atraumatic shoulder pain presenting to an academic practice were administered the Literacy in Musculoskeletal Problems (LiMP), in addition to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) questionnaires. A detailed physical exam and history was performed by a fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon. Demographic patient data, in addition to prior imaging and orthopaedic treatment, was tabulated. The association between demographics, pain-related variables, and MHL with the ASES, SANE, and QuickDASH scores were examined using Spearman correlation coefficients for continuous variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for categorical variables. Non-parametric analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine the independent association of predictor variables with PROMs.

RESULTS

A total of 439 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled. The mean age was 58.8±12.6years (range: 24-93) with 162 (37%) being men. Overall, 172 patients (39.2%) attained a college degree or higher and 183 (41.7%) were currently employed. MHL was significantly associated with ASES (p=0.03), but not with the QuickDASH (p=0.75) or SANE score (p=0.16). Similarly, age, having been in the medical profession or having previously visited an orthopaedist were not associated with PROMs, while employment status correlated to the SANE score (p=0.002). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain level demonstrated varying strengths of association with each of the scores [ASES (r=-0.729, p<0.001), QuickDASH (r=0.557, p<0.001), and SANE (r=-0.430, p<0.001)]. MHL demonstrated no association with initial patient-derived treatment selection.

DISCUSSION

The SANE and QuickDASH may be administered to patients presenting for atraumatic shoulder pain in the outpatient setting regardless of MHL. Further research should be focused on the utility of the ASES instrument amongst patients with lower educational levels and/or limited MHL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; diagnostic.

Predictors of older adults' chronic pain in the context of opioid adverse drug events

BACKGROUND

Factors predictive of chronic pain in older adults could help focus prevention and treatment efforts for those most at risk of chronic pain.

PURPOSE

The objective of the study was to describe demographic and pain self-management factors predictive of chronic pain in the context of opioid adverse drug events (ADEs) reported for a cohort of older adults within the same year.

METHOD

The design was a post hoc analysis of 9,095 cases aged 65 years and older from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey that reported chronic pain and 380 cases aged 65 years and older with opioid adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) during the second quarter of 2019. Logistic regression predicted chronic pain.

RESULTS

Less than a baccalaureate education increased the odds of chronic pain by 28.0% while lower income minimally increased the odds. Male gender increased the odds of chronic pain by 12.0%. Increased age minimally increased the odds for chronic pain. Use of opioids, other pain treatments, complementary treatments, and antidepressants were all associated with increased odds of chronic pain. FAERS opioid ADEs ranged from pruritus to death, with death identified in 16 (4.2%) cases. Misuse, abuse, or dependence was documented in 1.8% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Less-educated older adults may be particularly at risk of chronic pain and should be routinely assessed and prescribed safe and efficacious pain self-management as needed. Some men may need additional support to use pain treatments.

A systematic review of the association between health literacy and pain self-management

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the impact of health literacy on pain self-management contexts, processes, and outcomes.

METHODS

This systematic review employed a narrative synthesis. We used databases, including PubMed and PsycINFO, and handsearching of the reference lists to identify articles published before December 2020. Pain self-management variables were chosen based on the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory. Quality was assessed using the National Institute of Health quality assessment tool for observational and cross-sectional studies.

RESULTS

Twenty studies that included 6173 participants were used. Most studies measured functional domains of the health literacy concept. Twelve studies reported small to large associations between health literacy and pain knowledge, medication regimen adherence, or pain. Thirteen studies considered health literacy clinical risks in tailoring education, while seven viewed it as personal assets developed via education.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited information on the contribution of health literacy to pain self-management context factors and processes exists. Current evidence was limited by a lack of temporality, theoretical basis, and a priori sample estimation.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Using brief functional literacy scales in the clinical environment can be more practical. Identifying patients' literacy levels helps clinicians personalize education, which then promotes patients' knowledge of pain, medication regimen adherence, and pain control.

Health literacy and health outcomes in patients with low back pain: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Health literacy has been associated with pain intensity and pain control. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding this association. In the field of low back pain research, inconsistent reporting of outcomes has been highlighted. To address this issue a Core Outcome Set has been developed.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this scoping review were: (1) The health literacy measures currently employed for low back pain and the aspects of health literacy they include. (2) The low back pain health outcomes included in such work. (3) The extent to which these health outcomes reflect the Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials in Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

METHODS

The search included thirteen bibliographic databases, using medical subject heading terms for low back pain and health literacy, and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The eligibility criteria were defined by the Joanna Briggs Institute PCC mnemonic. A thematic framework approach was used for analysis.

RESULTS

The search yielded ten relevant studies for inclusion, amongst which a total of nine health literacy measures and 50 health outcome measures were used. Most health literacy measures focused on functional health literacy, with few assessing communicative and critical health literacy. The health outcomes assessed by the included studies could be broadly categorised into: Pain, Disability, Behaviour, Knowledge and Beliefs, and Resource Utilisation. Most of these outcome measures studied (36 out of 50) did not directly reflect the Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials in Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

CONCLUSIONS

To allow for comparison across findings and the development of a rigorous evidence base, future work should include the Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials in Non-Specific Low Back Pain. There is an urgent need to broaden the evidence-base to include regions where low back pain morbidity is high, but data is lacking. Such work demands the incorporation of comprehensive measures of health literacy that have both generic and culturally sensitive components.

Experiences of neurological surgeons with malpractice lawsuits

OBJECTIVE

As a specialty that treats acute pathology and refractory pain, neurosurgery is at risk for high liability, making the practice of defensive medicine quite common. The extent to which the practice of defensive medicine is linked to experience with malpractice lawsuits remains unclear. The aims of this study were to clarify this by surveying neurosurgeons about the frequency of experiencing medical lawsuits and to show how neurosurgeons reflect on facing such lawsuits.

METHODS

A survey consisting of 24 questions was distributed among members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. The survey consisted of four parts: 1) demographics of participants; 2) the way malpractice lawsuits affect the way respondents practice medicine; 3) experiences with medical malpractice lawsuits; and 4) the effect of the medical malpractice environment on one's own practice of medicine.

RESULTS

There were a total of 490 survey respondents, 83.5% of whom were employed in the US. Of the respondents, 39.5% stated they were frequently or always concerned about being sued, and 77.4% stated their fear had led to a change in how they practice medicine. For 58.4%, this change led to the practice of defensive medicine, while for others it led to more extensive documentation (14.3%) and/or to referring or dropping complex cases (12.4%).Among the respondents, 80.9% at some time were named in a medical malpractice lawsuit and 12.3% more than 10 times. The main concerns expressed about being sued included losing confidence and practicing defensive medicine (17.8%), personal assets being at risk (16.9%), and being named in the National Practitioner Data Bank (15.6%). Given the medical malpractice environment, 58.7% of respondents considered referring complex patient cases, whereas 36.5% considered leaving the practice of medicine. The fear of being sued (OR 4.06, 95% CI 2.53-6.51) and the consideration of limiting the scope of practice (OR 3.08, 1.80-5.20) were both independently associated with higher odds of considering leaving the practice of medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

The current medicolegal landscape has a profound impact on neurosurgical practice. The fear of being sued, the financial aspects of practicing defensive medicine, and the proportion of neurosurgeons who are considering leaving the practice of medicine emphasize the need for a shift in the medicolegal landscape to a system in which fear of being sued does not play a dominant role and the interests of patients are protected.