Surgical complications in 275 HIV-infected liver and/or kidney transplantation recipients

Incisional hernias post renal transplant: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Incisional hernia (IH) post renal transplant (RT) is relatively uncommon and can be challenging to manage clinically due to the presence of the kidney graft and patient immunosuppression. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesises the current literature in relation to IH rates, risk factors and outcomes post RT.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to July 2023. The most up to date Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines were followed. Pertinent clinical information was synthesised. A meta-analysis of the pooled proportions of IH rates, the rates of patients requiring surgical repair and the rates of recurrence post RT are reported.

RESULTS

Twenty studies comprising 16,018 patients were included in this analysis. The pooled rate of IH occurrence post RT was 4% (CI 3-5%). The pooled rate of IH repair post RT was 61% (CI 14-100%). The pooled rate of IH recurrence after repair was 16% (CI 9-23%). Risk factors identified for IH development post RT are BMI, immunosuppression, age, smoking, incision type, reoperation, concurrent abdominal wall hernia, lymphocele formation and pulmonary disease.

CONCLUSIONS

IH post RT is uncommon and the majority of IH post RT are repaired surgically on an elective basis.

Efficacy of hope: Analysis of organ quality and availability among deceased HIV-positive donors

BACKGROUND

Improved survival among people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH) has led to increased organ failure, necessitating transplantation. In 2013, the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act was passed, allowing PWH to donate organs to other PWH. No study has assessed organ quality and quantity among a national pool of PWH.

METHODS

CFAR Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS), a multicenter study capturing data on PWH, was used to identify 6504 deaths from 1999 to 2018. Exclusions included cause of death, chronic kidney disease, fibrosis-4 score ≥ 3.25, and opportunistic infection at the time of death. Donor quality was defined by HIV viremia and the kidney donor profile index (KDPI). The CDC Wonder database, which contains national death data, permitted the estimation of deaths among PWH nationally from 1999 to 2018. Assuming CNICS was representative of PWH nationally, percentages of potential donors were applied to the CDC Wonder cohort.

RESULTS

Within CNICS, there were 3241 (65.9%) potential kidney donors and 3536 (71.9%) potential liver donors from 1999 to 2018. Based on viremia and KDPI, 821 were lower-risk kidney donors (16.7%) and 1206 (24.5%) were lower-risk liver donors. Within CDC Wonder, we identified 12 048 potential donors from 1999 to 2018. Extrapolating from CNICS to the national cohort suggested 396 kidney donors (792 kidneys) and 433 liver donors annually, with 100 kidney donors (200 kidneys) and 147 livers being lower-risk.

CONCLUSION

A substantial number of PWH meet donation criteria, a valuable source of organs for PWH in need of transplants. Our estimates suggest there may be more available organs from PWH than current transplant numbers indicate.

Kidney Transplantation in HIV-positive Patients: Current Practice and Management Strategies

BACKGROUND

HIV-positive patients had been successfully transplanted for the last 15 y and the donor pool had successfully been expanded to also include HIV-positive donors.

METHODS

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of transplantation in HIV-positive patients and highlight some of the important issues reported in the literature. We pooled clinical data from different cohorts to show some of the common issues encountered in HIV-positive transplantation. Furthermore, we searched MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL to create a comprehensive table for current evidence for different issues currently encountered when transplanting HIV-positive patients.

RESULTS

We included data from 19 cohort studies and reported on outcomes of the current HIV-positive transplant programs. We made recommendations based on personal experience as well as the experience reported in the literature regarding rejection, opportunistic infection, and HIV-associated nephropathy. Opportunistic infections and malignancies are not a major problem for this population group.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-positive patients encounter very specific issues after transplantation, specifically related to drug interactions and higher rejection rates. When utilizing HIV-positive donors, the recurrence of HIV-associated nephropathy in the graft kidney is an issue which can be important. Despite some issues with high rejection rates, HIV-positive patients have similar results to HIV-negative patients posttransplantation.

Perioperative Antiretroviral Regimen for HIV/AIDS Patients Who Underwent Abdominal Surgery

BACKGROUND

A short interruption of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and reduced oral bioavailability of antiretroviral medications could occur in perioperative human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) patients who undergo abdominal surgery. Therefore, we focused on the changes in HIV viral load and CD4⁺ T lymphocyte count in HIV/AIDS patients after surgery and explored whether the perioperative use of intravenous antiretroviral drugs is beneficial in lowering the viral load and increasing the safety of the surgery.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from HIV/AIDS patients who underwent abdominal surgery at our institution from January 2019 and April 2019. According to the use of different antiretroviral medications during the perioperative period, the HIV/AIDS patients were divided into four groups: Group I: Patients continued their original antiretroviral medications; Group II: Patients received their original antiretroviral medications plus intravenous administration of the fusion inhibitor albuvirtide (ABT); Group III: Patients received ABT alone; and Group IV: Patients did not receive ART. The primary outcomes considered were the changes in HIV load and CD4⁺ T lymphocyte count and the postoperative complications in the four groups.

RESULTS

A total of 64 HIV/AIDS patients were enrolled, and their data were analyzed descriptively. There were no differences between group I and group II in terms of the changes in viral load. The viral load continued to decrease in group III within 30 days after surgery, especially from D7 to D30 (t = 2.179, p = 0.043). However, the viral load showed an upward trend after surgery in group IV. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the changes in viral load after surgery (p = 0.022). However, there were no statistically significant differences between group III and group IV in the postoperative changes in the CD4⁺ T lymphocyte count. Seven out of 64 patients had postoperative infective complications. The incidence of complications from high to low was as follows: group IV > group I > group III > group II (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A short perioperative interruption of ART may have a small impact on viral load in HIV/AIDS patients on virologic suppression after abdominal surgery. For patients with a detectable viral load, an intravenous injection of ABT in the perioperative period can reduce the viral load quickly, lower the occurrence of postoperative complications, and increase operation safety for both the HIV/AIDS patient and the surgeons.

Access to the waiting list and to kidney transplantation for people living with HIV: A national registry study

We compared access to a kidney transplantation (KT) waiting list (WL) and to KT between people living with HIV (PLHIV) and HIV-uninfected controls. Using the REIN (the national Renal Epidemiology and Information Network registry), we included all PLHIV initiating dialysis in France throughout 2006-2010 and HIV-uninfected controls matched for age, sex, year of dialysis initiation, and the existence of a diabetic nephropathy. Patients were prospectively followed until December 2015. We used a competitive risk approach to assess the cumulative incidence of enrollment on WL and of KT, with death as a competing event (subdistribution hazard ratio adjusted on comorbidities, asdHR). There were 255 PLHIV in the REIN (median age 47 years) of whom 180 (71%) were also found in the French Hospital Database on HIV (FHDH-ANRS CO4) including 126 (70%) known to be on antiretroviral therapy with HIV viral suppression (VS). Five years after dialysis initiation, 65%, and 76%, of treated PLHIV with VS, and of HIV-uninfected controls were enrolled on a WL (asdHR 0.68; 95% CI 0.50-0.91). Access to KT was also less frequent and delayed for treated PLHIV with VS (asdHR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.52-1.10). PLHIV continue to face difficulties to access KT.

Acquired hypogammaglobulinemia and pathogen-specific antibody depletion after solid organ transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus infection: A brief report

Hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) frequently occurs in recipients after types of (SOT). The incidence and significance of HGG in HIV+ recipients of SOT are just being explored. We reported that 12% of the recipients in the SOT in multi-center HIV-TR (HIV-TR) Study developed moderate or severe HGG at 1 year. In LT recipients, this was associated with serious infections and death. We have now further characterized the decreased antibodies in HIV+ SOT recipients who developed HGG. We measured the levels of pathogen-specific antibodies and poly-specific self-reactive antibodies (PSA) in relation to total IgG levels from serial serum samples for 20 HIV+ SOT recipients who developed moderate to severe HGG following SOT. Serum antibody levels to measles, tetanus toxoid, and HIV-1 were determined by EIA. Levels of PSAs were determined by incubating control lymphocytes with patient serum, staining with anti-human IgG Fab-FITC, and analysis by flow cytometry. Levels of PSA were higher compared to healthy, HIV-uninfected controls at pre-transplant baseline and increased by weeks 12 and 26, but the changes were not significant. Likewise, anti-HIV antibody levels remained unchanged over time. In contrast, antibody levels against measles and tetanus were significantly reduced from baseline by week 12, and did not return to baseline, even after 2 years. For HIV patients who develop moderate to severe HGG after transplant, the reduction in IgG levels is associated with a significant decrease in pathogen-specific antibody titers, while PSA levels and anti-HIV antibodies are unchanged. This may contribute to infectious complications and other clinical endpoints.

Surgical Complications Requiring an Early Relaparotomy in HIV-Infected Liver Transplant Recipients: Risk Factors and Impact on Survival

AIM

We aimed to analyze the risk factors for early surgical complications requiring relaparotomy and the related impact on overall survival (OS) in HIV-infected patients submitted to liver transplantation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study on a nationwide multicenter cohort of 157 HIV-infected patients submitted to liver transplantation in 6 Italian transplant units between 2004 to 2014.

RESULTS

The median preoperative model for end-stage liver disease score was 18 (interquartile range 12-26.5). An early relaparotomy was performed in 24.8% of patients, and the underlying clinical causes were biliary leak (8.2%), bleeding (8.2%), intestinal perforation (4.5%), and suspected vascular complications (3.8%). The OS at 1, 3, and 5 years was 74.3%, 68.0%, and 60.0%, respectively, and an early relaparotomy was not a prognostic factor itself, but an increasing number of relaparotomies was associated with decreased survival (hazard ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.81, P = .01). In the multivariate analysis, preoperative refractory ascites (odds ratio 3.32, 95% CI 1.18-6.47, P = .02) and Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy reconstruction (odds ratio 12.712, 95% CI 2.47-65.38, P ≤ .01) were identified as significant risk factors for early relaparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV-infected liver transplant recipients, an increasing number of early relaparotomies due to surgical complications did negatively affect the OS. Preoperative refractory ascites reflecting a severe portal hypertension and a difficult biliary tract reconstruction requiring a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy were associated with an increased risk of early relaparotomy.

Early post-liver transplant surgical morbidity in HIV-infected recipients: risk factor for overall survival? A nationwide retrospective study

The aim of the study was to analyse the risk factors for early surgical complications requiring relaparotomy and the related impact on overall survival (OS) in HIV-infected patients submitted to liver transplantation. Thus a retrospective investigation was conducted on a nationwide multicentre cohort of 157 HIV patients submitted to liver transplantation in six Italian Transplant Units between 2004 and 2014. An early relaparotomy was performed in 24.8% of cases and the underlying clinical causes were biliary leak (8.2%), bleeding (8.2%), intestinal perforation (4.5%) and suspect of vascular complications(3.8%). No differences in terms of prevalence for either overall or cause-specific early relaparotomies were noted when compared with a non-HIV control group, matched for MELD, recipient age, HCV-RNA positivity and HBV prevalence. While in the control group an early relaparotomy appeared a negative prognostic factor, such impact on OS was not noted in HIV recipients. Nonetheless increasing number of relaparotomies were associated with decreased survival. In multivariate analysis, preoperative refractory ascites and Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy reconstruction were significant risk factors for early relaparotomy. To conclude, in HIV liver transplanted patients, an increasing number of early relaparotomies because of surgical complications does negatively affect the OS. Preoperative refractory ascites reflecting a severe portal hypertension and a difficult biliary tract reconstruction requiring a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy are associated with increased risk of early relaparotomy.

Challenges of kidney transplantation in HIV positive recipients

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has long been a contraindication to kidney transplantation due to transplant immunosuppression, HIV-associated renal dysfunction, and nephrotoxicity associated with antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, advances in antiretroviral therapies and transplant immunosuppression regimens have allowed patients to successfully undergo kidney transplantation. Emerging data has shown that kidney transplantation may be a viable option for appropriately selected HIV patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In this review, we discuss the indications, immunosuppression protocols, and outcomes of kidney transplantation in HIV patients.

Esophagectomy in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome: A Viable Option

The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes for patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immune deficiency virus (AIDS) who had esophagectomy done for both benign and malignant conditions. A retrospective chart review of patients with HIV and AIDS undergoing esophagectomy at a rural referral hospital was done for the period of 2009-2014. Patient postoperative complications, outcomes, and follow-up data were charted. All procedures were done by a single lead surgeon. Nine patients met the study criteria, 7 of whom had esophageal cancer, and 2 with strictures. Four patients had received nutritional self-expanding metal stent preoperatively. The mean stent duration was 61 days. Three patients had been on antiretroviral therapy before surgery. Preoperative CD4 counts were available in 7 patients. Eight patients underwent a 3-field esophagectomy and 1 was unresectable. Seven of these patients had successful outcomes, with varying follow-up times. One patient died post procedure while in the hospital. Complications included stricture and anastomotic leak. Although HIV-positive patients face increased risk during surgical procedures, this status should not be a firm contraindication to surgery. Quality nutritional status, antiretroviral use, and overall CD4 count levels remain important parameters in considering surgical treatment for these patients. With careful patient evaluation and planning, esophagectomy in an HIV and AIDS setting is feasible with successful outcomes.

Induction Immunosuppression and Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus

There is an increased risk of acute rejection (AR) in human immunodeficiency virus-positive (HIV+) kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Induction immunosuppression is standard of care for those at high risk of AR; however, use in HIV+ patients is controversial, given fears of increased infection rates. We sought to compare clinical outcomes between HIV+ KT recipients who were treated with (i) anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), (ii) IL-2 receptor blocker, and (iii) no induction. We studied 830 HIV+ KT recipients between 2000 and 2014, as captured in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, and compared rates of delayed graft function (DGF), AR, graft loss and death. Infections and hospitalizations were ascertained by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes in a subset of 308 patients with Medicare. Compared with no induction, neither induction agent was associated with an increased risk of infection (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.18). HIV+ recipients who received induction spent fewer days in the hospital (weighted relative risk [wRR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.95), had lower rates of DGF (wRR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.84), less graft loss (wHR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.89) and a trend toward lower mortality (wHR 0.60, 95% CI 0.24-1.28). Those who received induction with ATG had lower rates of AR (wRR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.99). Induction in HIV+ KT recipients was not associated with increased infections; in fact, those receiving ATG, the most potent agent, had the lowest rates. In light of the high risk of AR in this population, induction therapy should be strongly considered.

Thirty-day postoperative mortality among individuals with HIV infection receiving antiretroviral therapy and procedure-matched, uninfected comparators

IMPORTANCE

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has converted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection into a chronic condition, and patients now undergo a variety of surgical procedures, but current surgical outcomes are inadequately characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 30-day postoperative mortality in patients with HIV infection receiving ART with the rates in uninfected individuals.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective analysis of nationwide electronic medical record data from the US Veterans Health Administration Healthcare System, October 1, 1996, to September 30, 2010. Common inpatient surgical procedures were grouped using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Clinical Classification System to match HIV-infected and uninfected patients in a 1:2 ratio. Data on 1641 patients with HIV infection receiving combination ART who were undergoing inpatient surgery were compared with data on 3282 procedure-matched, uninfected comparators. Poisson regression models of 30-day postoperative mortality were adjusted for procedure year, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, hemoglobin level, albumin level, HIV infection, CD4 cell count, and HIV-1 RNA level.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

All-cause 30-day postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

The most common procedures in both groups were cholecystectomy (10.5%), hip arthroplasty (10.5%), spine surgery (9.8%), herniorrhaphy (7.4%), and coronary artery bypass grafting (7.0%). In patients with HIV infection, CD4 cell distributions were 80.0% with 200/μL or more, 16.3% with 50/μL to 199/μL, and 3.7% with less than 50/μL; 74.1% of patients with HIV infection had undetectable HIV-1 RNA. Human immunodeficiency virus infection was associated with higher 30-day postoperative mortality compared with the mortality in uninfected patients (3.4% [56 patients]) vs 1.6% [53]); incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.11; 95% CI, 1.41-3.17; P < .001). CD4 cell count was inversely associated with mortality, but HIV-1 RNA provided no additional information. After adjustment, patients with HIV infection had increased mortality compared with uninfected patients at all CD4 cell count strata (≥500/μL: IRR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.02-3.60; P = .04; 200-499/μL: IRR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.20-2.98; P = .01; 50-199/μL: IRR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.29-5.47; P = .01; and <50/μL: IRR, 6.21; 95% CI, 3.55-10.85; P < .001). Hypoalbuminemia (IRR, 4.35; 95% CI, 2.78-6.81; P < .001) and age in decades (IRR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.23-1.76; P < .001) were also strongly associated with mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Current postoperative mortality rates among individuals with HIV infection who are receiving ART are low and are influenced as much by hypoalbuminemia and age as by CD4 cell status. Human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell count are only 2 of many factors associated with surgical outcomes that should be incorporated into surgical decision making.

Outcome and management of HCV/HIV coinfection pre- and post-liver transplantation. A 2015 update

Liver transplantation is increasingly performed in selected HIV-infected patients in most developed countries, with excellent results reported in patients with liver diseases unrelated to HCV. In contrast, survival in HCV/HIV-coinfected liver recipients is poorer than in HCV-monoinfected patients, due to more aggressive recurrence of HCV and consequent graft loss and death. Results from American, French, and Spanish cohort studies showed a 5-year survival rate of only 50-55%. Therefore, it is debated whether liver transplantation should be offered to HCV/HIV-coinfected patients. Studies have shown that the variables more consistently associated with poor outcome are: (1) the use of old or HCV-positive donors, (2) dual liver-kidney transplantation, (3) recipients with very low body mass index and (4) less site experience. However, the most effective factor influencing transplantation outcome is the successful treatment of HCV recurrence with anti-HCV. Survival is 80% in patients whose HCV infection resolves. Unfortunately, the rates of sustained virological response with pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin in coinfected recipients are low, particularly for genotype 1 (only 10%). Here we present a non-systematic review of the literature based on our own experience in different liver transplant scenarios. This review covers selection criteria in HIV-infected patients, pre- and post-LT management, donor selection, anti-HCV treatment, drug interactions with antiretrovirals and anti-HCV direct antiviral agents, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver retransplantation. Recommendations are rated. Finally, we explain how the introduction of new effective and more tolerable direct antiviral agents may improve significantly the outcome of HCV/HIV-coinfected liver recipients.

HIV and liver transplantation: The British Columbia experience, 2004 to 2013

Historically, HIV-positive individuals have not been considered to be candidates for liver transplantation due to the need for further immunosuppresion of these patients post-transplant, as well as other factors such as pharmacokinetic interactions between the necessary antiretroviral and immunosuppressant drugs. However, HIV-positive individuals with end-stage liver disease are now eligible for liver transplantation in British Columbia. The purpose of this study was to summarize the outcomes of HIV-positive individuals referred for liver transplanation in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND:

The demand for definitive management of end-stage organ disease in HIV-infected Canadians is growing. Until recently, despite international evidence of good clinical outcomes, HIV-infected Canadians with end-stage liver disease were ineligible for transplantation, except in British Columbia (BC), where the liver transplant program of BC Transplant has accepted these patients for referral, assessment, listing and provision of liver allograft. There is a need to evaluate the experience in BC to determine the issues surrounding liver transplantation in HIV-infected patients.

METHODS:

The present study was a chart review of 28 HIV-infected patients who were referred to BC Transplant for liver transplantation between 2004 and 2013. Data regarding HIV and liver disease status, initial transplant assessment and clinical outcomes were collected.

RESULTS:

Most patients were BC residents and were assessed by the multidisciplinary team at the BC clinic. The majority had undetectable HIV viral loads, were receiving antiretroviral treatments and were infected with hepatitis C virus (n=16). The most common comorbidities were anxiety and mood disorders (n=4), and hemophilia (n=4). Of the patients eligible for transplantation, four were transplanted for autoimmune hepatitis (5.67 years post-transplant), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (2.33 years), hepatitis C virus (2.25 years) and hepatitis B-delta virus coinfection (recent transplant). One patient died from acute renal failure while waiting for transplantation. Ten patients died during preassessment and 10 were unsuitable transplant candidates. The most common reason for unsuitability was stable disease not requiring transplantation (n=4).

CONCLUSIONS:

To date, interdisciplinary care and careful selection of patients have resulted in successful outcomes including the longest living HIV-infected post-liver transplant recipient in Canada.

Solid organ transplants in HIV-infected patients

There is a growing need for kidney and liver transplants in persons living with HIV. Fortunately, with the significant advances in antiretroviral therapy and management of opportunistic infections, HIV infection is no longer an absolute contraindication for solid organ transplantation. Data from several large prospective multi-center cohort studies have shown that solid organ transplantation in carefully selected HIV-infected individuals is safe. However, significant challenges have been identified including prevention of acute rejection, management of drug-drug interactions and treatment of recurrent viral hepatitis. This article reviews the selection criteria, outcomes, and special management considerations for HIV-infected patients undergoing liver or kidney transplantation.

Liver transplantation for patients with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus co-infection: update in 2013

Because of the progress of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), mortality due to opportunistic infection resulting in AIDS has been remarkably reduced. However, meanwhile, half of those patients have died of end-stage liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) with liver cirrhosis and early occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, in 2013, non-cirrhotic portal hypertension due to ART drugs or still unknown mechanisms have become problematic with early progression of the disease in this patient population. Liver transplantation (LT) could be one treatment of choice in such cases, but the indications for LT perioperative management, including both HIV and HCV treatments and immunosuppression, are still challenging. In this review, we update the literature on HIV/HCV co-infection and LT as well as recent effort for modifying allocation system for those patients.