1
|
Berg T, Aehling NF, Bruns T, Welker MW, Weismüller T, Trebicka J, Tacke F, Strnad P, Sterneck M, Settmacher U, Seehofer D, Schott E, Schnitzbauer AA, Schmidt HH, Schlitt HJ, Pratschke J, Pascher A, Neumann U, Manekeller S, Lammert F, Klein I, Kirchner G, Guba M, Glanemann M, Engelmann C, Canbay AE, Braun F, Berg CP, Bechstein WO, Becker T, Trautwein C. S2k-Leitlinie Lebertransplantation der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:1397-1573. [PMID: 39250961 DOI: 10.1055/a-2255-7246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Berg
- Bereich Hepatologie, Medizinischen Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Niklas F Aehling
- Bereich Hepatologie, Medizinischen Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Tony Bruns
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Martin-Walter Welker
- Medizinische Klinik I Gastroent., Hepat., Pneum., Endokrin. Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Tobias Weismüller
- Klinik für Innere Medizin - Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Vivantes Humboldt-Klinikum, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Jonel Trebicka
- Medizinische Klinik B für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Frank Tacke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Medizinische Klinik m. S. Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK) und Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Pavel Strnad
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland
| | - Martina Sterneck
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Klinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Eckart Schott
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II - Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Diabetolgie, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - Hartmut H Schmidt
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Chirurgische Klinik, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland
| | - Ulf Neumann
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland
| | - Steffen Manekeller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Frank Lammert
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Ingo Klein
- Chirurgische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Gabriele Kirchner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg und Innere Medizin I, Caritaskrankenhaus St. Josef Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Markus Guba
- Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum München, München, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Glanemann
- Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland
| | - Cornelius Engelmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Medizinische Klinik m. S. Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK) und Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Ali E Canbay
- Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Felix Braun
- Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schlewswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Christoph P Berg
- Innere Medizin I Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Becker
- Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schlewswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim HS, Kang MJ, Kang J, Kim K, Kim B, Kim SH, Kim SJ, Kim YI, Kim JY, Kim JS, Kim H, Kim HJ, Nahm JH, Park WS, Park E, Park JK, Park JM, Song BJ, Shin YC, Ahn KS, Woo SM, Yu JI, Yoo C, Lee K, Lee DH, Lee MA, Lee SE, Lee IJ, Lee H, Im JH, Jang KT, Jang HY, Jun SY, Chon HJ, Jung MK, Chung YE, Chong JU, Cho E, Chie EK, Choi SB, Choi SY, Choi SJ, Choi JY, Choi HJ, Hong SM, Hong JH, Hong TH, Hwang SH, Hwang IG, Park JS. Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024; 28:161-202. [PMID: 38679456 PMCID: PMC11128785 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.23-170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung Sun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mee Joo Kang
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jingu Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital of Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Bohyun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Hun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong-Il Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Young Kim
- Department of Pathology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sil Kim
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haeryoung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hae Nahm
- Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Suk Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eunkyu Park
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joo Kyung Park
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Myung Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Byeong Jun Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yong Chan Shin
- Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Keun Soo Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Hospital, Immuno-Oncology Branch Division of Rare and Refractory Center, Research Institute of National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoungbun Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myung Ah Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Eun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ik Jae Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Huisong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Im
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kee-Taek Jang
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Young Jang
- Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Jun
- Department of Pathology, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong Jae Chon
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Min Kyu Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yong Eun Chung
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Uk Chong
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Services Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eunae Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae Byeol Choi
- Department of Surgery, Korea Universtiy Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seo-Yeon Choi
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Ji Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Young Choi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Jeong Choi
- Department of Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyung Hong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Ho Hong
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hye Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - In Gyu Hwang
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Seong Park
- Department of Surgery, Pancreatobiliary Clinic, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang YX, Xu C, Zhang CC, Liu GY, Liu XC, Fan HN, Pan B, Li YC. Vascular reconstruction provides short-term and long-term survival benefits for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective, multicenter study. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024:S1499-3872(24)00070-5. [PMID: 38824095 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), radical resection can be achieved by resection and reconstruction of the vasculature. However, whether vascular reconstruction (VR) improves long-term and short-term prognosis has not been demonstrated comprehensively. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study of patients who received surgery for HCCA with or without VR. Variables associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified based on Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to explore the impact of VR. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used for comparisons of short-term survival between the groups. Patients' intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were compared. RESULTS Totally 447 patients were enrolled. We divided these patients into 3 groups: VR with radical resections (n = 84); non-VR radical resections (n = 309) and non-radical resection (we pooled VR-nonradical and non-VR nonradical together, n = 54). Cox regression revealed that carbohydrate antigen 242 (CA242), vascular invasion, lymph node metastasis and poor differentiation were independent risk factors for OS and RFS. There was no significant difference of RMST between the VR and non-VR radical groups within 12 months after surgery (10.18 vs. 10.76 mon, P = 0.179), although the 5-year OS (P < 0.001) and RFS (P < 0.001) were worse in the VR radical group. The incidences of most complications were not significantly different, but those of bile leakage (P < 0.001) and postoperative infection (P = 0.009) were higher in the VR radical group than in the non-VR radical group. Additionally, the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) up to 7 days after surgery tended to decrease in all groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative liver failure between the VR and non-VR radical groups. CONCLUSIONS Radical resection can be achieved with VR to improve the survival rate without worsening short-term survival compared with resection with non-VR. After adequate assessment of the patient's general condition, VR can be considered in the resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Xian Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Chao Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, China
| | - Cheng-Cheng Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Guang-Yi Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Xing-Chao Liu
- Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610000, China
| | - Hai-Ning Fan
- Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining 810016, China
| | - Bi Pan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China
| | - Yuan-Cheng Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing 400038, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Promsorn J, Naknan P, Sookprasert A, Wirasorn K, Chindaprasirt J, Titapun A, Intarawichian P, Harisinghani M. Radiographic features predictive of recurrence and survival after surgical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Heliyon 2024; 10:e28805. [PMID: 38617950 PMCID: PMC11015104 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To study which radiographic features were associated with recurrence and adverse outcome in patients undergoing surgical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PCCA), as well as to evaluate the imaging patterns that signify recurrence after the resection of PCCA. Materials and methods This study was conducted in a solitary tertiary center and utilized a retrospective, analytical, case-control design. The study population consisted of patients with pathologically confirmed PCCA who underwent surgical resection and were subsequently followed up from January 2009 to December 2017. A total of 77 patients were enrolled in the study and were categorized into two distinct groups, namely recurrent and non-recurrent. The analysis encompassed the examination of demographic data and recurrence patterns. Additionally, survival and multivariate analyses were employed to assess radiographic imaging data and surgical information. Results Seventy-seven patients diagnosed with PCCA based on pathological evidence were included in the study. Among the participants, there were 28 females and 49 males, with ages ranging from 41 to 81 years (mean age of 60.65 ± 7.66). A noteworthy finding was the recurrence rate of 65 % observed following surgical resection. The presence of regional lymph node (LN) metastasis, adjacent organ invasion, and surgical margin emerged as the three independent factors that exhibited a significant association with recurrence after post-operative resection (p = 0.023, p = 0.028, and p = 0.010, respectively). The patients with PCCA who experienced regional LN metastasis had a median overall survival (OS) of 22 months, which was significantly lower than the 46 months observed in those without regional LN metastasis (p < 0.018). Furthermore, the individuals with regional LN metastasis had a death rate that was 2.08 times higher than those without (p = 0.040). In addition, those with adjacent organ invasion had an OS duration of 21 months compared with 52 months in those without (p = 0.008), and the rate of death was 2.39 times higher (p = 0.018). Patients with an R1 resection margin had an OS duration of 36 months compared with 51.56 months in those with an R0 resection margin (p = 0.006), as well as a 2.13 times higher rate of recurrence (p = 0.010) and a 2.43 times higher mortality rate (p = 0.013). Conclusion The presence of regional LN metastasis, invasion of adjacent organs, and R1 resection margin were identified as distinct factors that are linked to both disease recurrence and reduced OS. Local recurrence, as well as the spread of cancer to distant organs such as the lungs and liver, were frequently observed patterns of recurrence. To enhance the precision of staging, prognosis, and treatment, the inclusion of periductal fat or invasion of adjacent organs should be considered in the staging system for PCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julaluck Promsorn
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
| | - Panjaporn Naknan
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
| | - Aumkhae Sookprasert
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
| | - Kosin Wirasorn
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
| | - Jarin Chindaprasirt
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
| | - Attapol Titapun
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand
| | | | - Mukesh Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Andraus W, Tustumi F, Santana AC, Pinheiro RSN, Waisberg DR, Lopes LD, Arantes RM, Santos VR, de Martino RB, D'Albuquerque LAC. Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A critical review. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024; 23:139-145. [PMID: 38310060 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCCC) is a dismal malignancy. There is no consensus regarding the best treatment for patients with unresectable phCCC. The present review aimed to gather the current pieces of evidence for liver transplantation and liver resection as a treatment for phCCC and to build better guidance for clinical practice. DATA SOURCES The search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS. The related references were searched manually. Inclusion criteria were: reports in English or Portuguese literature that a) patients with confirmed diagnosis of phCCC; b) patients treated with a curative intent; c) patients with the outcomes of liver resection and liver transplantation. Case reports, reviews, letters, editorials, conference abstracts and papers with full-text unavailability were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS Most of the current literature is based on observational retrospective studies with low grades of evidence. Liver resection has better long-term outcomes than systemic chemotherapy or palliation therapy and liver transplantation is a good alternative for selected patients with unresectable phCCC. All candidates for resection or transplantation should be medically fit and free of intrahepatic or extrahepatic diseases. As a general rule, patients presenting with a tumor having a longitudinal size > 3 cm or extending below the cystic duct, lymph node disease, confirmed extrahepatic dissemination; intraoperatively diagnosed metastatic disease; a history of other malignancies within the last five years, and did not complete chemoradiation regimen and were medically unfit should not be considered for transplantation. Some of these criteria should be individually assessed. Liver transplantation or resection should only be considered in highly experienced hepatobiliary centers, and any decision-making must be based on a multidisciplinary evaluation. CONCLUSIONS phCCC is a complex condition with high morbidity. Surgical therapies, including hepatectomy and liver transplantation, are the best option for better long-term disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wellington Andraus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Francisco Tustumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Chagas Santana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Daniel Reis Waisberg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Liliana Ducatti Lopes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rubens Macedo Arantes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vinicius Rocha Santos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Transplantation Unit, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dar FS, Abbas Z, Ahmed I, Atique M, Aujla UI, Azeemuddin M, Aziz Z, Bhatti ABH, Bangash TA, Butt AS, Butt OT, Dogar AW, Farooqi JI, Hanif F, Haider J, Haider S, Hassan SM, Jabbar AA, Khan AN, Khan MS, Khan MY, Latif A, Luck NH, Malik AK, Rashid K, Rashid S, Salih M, Saeed A, Salamat A, Tayyab GUN, Yusuf A, Zia HH, Naveed A. National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:1018-1042. [PMID: 38577184 PMCID: PMC10989497 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i9.1018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
A consensus meeting of national experts from all major national hepatobiliary centres in the country was held on May 26, 2023, at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre (PKLI & RC) after initial consultations with the experts. The Pakistan Society for the Study of Liver Diseases (PSSLD) and PKLI & RC jointly organised this meeting. This effort was based on a comprehensive literature review to establish national practice guidelines for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA). The consensus was that hCCA is a complex disease and requires a multidisciplinary team approach to best manage these patients. This coordinated effort can minimise delays and give patients a chance for curative treatment and effective palliation. The diagnostic and staging workup includes high-quality computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Brush cytology or biopsy utilizing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a mainstay for diagnosis. However, histopathologic confirmation is not always required before resection. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes and positron emission tomography scan are valuable adjuncts for staging. The only curative treatment is the surgical resection of the biliary tree based on the Bismuth-Corlette classification. Selected patients with unresectable hCCA can be considered for liver transplantation. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to patients with a high risk of recurrence. The use of preoperative biliary drainage and the need for portal vein embolisation should be based on local multidisciplinary discussions. Patients with acute cholangitis can be drained with endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage. Palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine has shown improved survival in patients with irresectable and recurrent hCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Saud Dar
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Zaigham Abbas
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Liver Transplantation, Dr. Ziauddin University Hospital, Karachi 75600, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Irfan Ahmed
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
- University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen B24 3FX, United Kingdom
| | - Muhammad Atique
- Department of Pathology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Usman Iqbal Aujla
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | | | - Zeba Aziz
- Department of Oncology, Hameed Latif Hospital, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti
- Division of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Tariq Ali Bangash
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Shaikh Zayed Hospital and Post Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Amna Subhan Butt
- Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Osama Tariq Butt
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Wahab Dogar
- Department of Liver Transplant, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat 66020, Pakistan
| | - Javed Iqbal Farooqi
- Department of Medicine & Gastroenterology, Lifecare Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar 25000, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
| | - Faisal Hanif
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant, Bahria International Hospital, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Jahanzaib Haider
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Siraj Haider
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplant, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Syed Mujahid Hassan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Jeelani Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat 66020, Pakistan
| | | | - Aman Nawaz Khan
- Department of Radiology, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Shoaib Khan
- Army Liver Transplant Unit, Pak Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Yasir Khan
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Amer Latif
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Shaikh Zayed Hospital and Post Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Nasir Hassan Luck
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi 75500, Pakistan
| | - Ahmad Karim Malik
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Kamran Rashid
- Rashid Nursing Home and Cancer Clinic, Rashid Nursing Home and Cancer Clinic, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
| | - Sohail Rashid
- Department of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplant, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Mohammad Salih
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Abdullah Saeed
- Department of Radiology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Amjad Salamat
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Quaid-e-Azam International Hospital, Rawalpindi 44000, Pakistan
| | - Ghias-un-Nabi Tayyab
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Post Graduate Medical Institute, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Aasim Yusuf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Haseeb Haider Zia
- Division of Hepatopancreatic Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
| | - Ammara Naveed
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tzedakis S, Belle A, Berzan D, Nassar A, Dohan A, Coriat R, Sindayigaya R, Fuks D. Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy for Definite Biliary Drainage in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Laparoscopic Resection: A Hybrid Minimal-Invasive Technique. Surg Innov 2024; 31:11-15. [PMID: 38130210 DOI: 10.1177/15533506231223916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Laparoscopic approach of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is still challenging. We report the original use of a endoscopic hepaticogastrostomy (EHG) for definite biliary drainage in order to avoid biliary reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS A 70-year-old man presenting with jaundice was referred for resection of a Bismuth type IIIa PHC. Repeated endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography failed to drain the future liver remnant, enabling only right anterior liver section drainage. EHG was performed three weeks before surgery. A hepatogastric anastomosis was created, placing a half-coated self-expanding endoprosthesis between biliary duct of segment 2 and the lesser gastric curvature. RESULTS A laparoscopic right hepatectomy extended to segment 1, common bile duct, and hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy was performed. The left hepatic duct was sectioned and ligated downstream to the biliary confluence of segment 2-3 and 4 allowing exclusive biliary flow through the EHG. The patient was disease free at 12 months, postoperative outcomes were uneventful except three readmissions for acute cholangitis due to prosthesis obstruction. CONCLUSIONS EHG may be used as definite biliary drainage technique in laparoscopic PHC resection, at the expense of prosthesis obstruction and cholangitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Arthur Belle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Diana Berzan
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Nassar
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Antony Dohan
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Romain Coriat
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Remy Sindayigaya
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Pancreatic, Hepato-biliary and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique, Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
- University of Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kawano F, Yoshioka R, Ichida H, Mise Y, Saiura A. Essential updates 2021/2022: Update in surgical strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:848-855. [PMID: 37927920 PMCID: PMC10623956 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Resection is the only potential curative treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC); however, complete resection is often technically challenging due to the anatomical location. Various innovative approaches and procedures were invented to circumvent this limitation but the rates of postoperative morbidity (20%-78%) and mortality (2%-15%) are still high. In patients diagnosed with resectable PHC, deliberate and coordinated preoperative workup and optimization of the patient and future liver remnant are crucial. Biliary drainage is recommended to relieve obstructive jaundice and optimize the clinical condition before liver resection. Biliary drainage for PHC can be performed either by endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. To date there is no consensus about which method is preferred. The volumetric assessment of the future remnant liver volume and optimization mainly using portal vein embolization is the gold standard in the management of the risk to develop post hepatectomy liver failure. The improvement of systemic chemotherapy has contributed to prolong the survival not only in patients with unresectable PHC but also in patients undergoing curative surgery. In this article, we review the literature and discuss the current surgical treatment of PHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumihiro Kawano
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| | - Ryuji Yoshioka
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| | - Hirofumi Ichida
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Mise
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| | - Akio Saiura
- Department of Hepatobiliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryJuntendo University Graduate School of MedicineHongo, TokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hu YF, Hu HJ, Lv TR, He ZQ, Dai YS, Li FY. Should more aggressive surgical resection be considered in the treatment for Bismuth types I and II hilar cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:4115-4123. [PMID: 36586821 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.12.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence regarding the optical surgical extent for Bismuth type I/II HCCA is lacking. we aims to evaluate the optimal surgical methods for Bismuth type I/II HCCA. Studies comparing bile duct resection (BDR) and BDR combined with liver resection (BDR + LR) for all types of HCCA patients were searched for analyses, and 14 studies were finally included. The main outcomes were the R0 resection rate and overall survival (OS). For all types of HCCA patents, BDR + LR resulted with higher R0 resection rates when comparing with BDR only (RR = 0.70, 95%CI, 0.63-0.78), and patients with R0 resections had eight times longer median survival and more long-time survival outcomes (3 and 5 year OS) comparing to those with non-R0 resections. Bismuth I/II HCCA patients also showed longer median survival and 3-year OS after R0 resections (P = 0.04). Moreover, there was no significant difference in 3-year OS between BDR and BDR + LR (P = 0.89) and we additionally found BDR resulted in less mortality or morbidity rates. In Europe and US, they resulted the R0 resection rates could be comparable between BDR and BDR + LR (P = 0.18), and Bismuth type I HCCA accounted for 75.8%, while in Asia, BDR + LR still resulted with higher R0 resection rates (P < 0.0001) and the Bismuth type I HCCA accounted for only 40.3%. The surgical approaches may not directly impact patient prognosis, patients with R0 resections are usually associated with improved survival outcomes; for selected Bismuth type I/II HCCA, BDR may be an acceptable option with regard to lower morbidity and comparable R0 resection rate comparing with BDR + LR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya-Fei Hu
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hai-Jie Hu
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Tian-Run Lv
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Zhi-Qiang He
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yu-Shi Dai
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Malik AK, Amer AO, Tingle SJ, Thompson ER, White SA, Manas DM, Wilson C. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents for reducing blood loss in adult liver resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 8:CD010872. [PMID: 37551841 PMCID: PMC10411946 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010872.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection is the optimal treatment for selected benign and malignant liver tumours, but it can be associated with significant blood loss. Numerous anaesthetic and surgical techniques have been developed to reduce blood loss and improve perioperative outcomes. One such technique is the application of topical fibrin-based haemostatic agents (FBHAs) to the resection surface. There is no standard practice for FBHA use, and a variety of commercial agents and devices are available, as well as non-FBHAs (e.g. collagen-based agents). The literature is inconclusive on the effectiveness of these methods and on the clinical benefits of their routine use. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of fibrin-based haemostatic agents in reducing intraoperative blood loss in adults undergoing liver resection. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group (CHBG) Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science up to 20 January 2023. We also searched online trial registries, checked the reference lists of all primary studies, and contacted the authors of included trials for additional published or unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered for inclusion all randomised clinical trials evaluating FBHAs versus no topical intervention or non-FBHAs, irrespective of publication type, publication status, language of publication, and outcomes reported. Eligible participants could have any liver pathology and be undergoing major or minor liver resections through open or laparoscopic surgery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the results of the literature search and used data extraction forms to collate the results. We expressed dichotomous outcome results as risk ratios (RRs) and continuous outcome results as mean differences (MDs), each with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We used a random-effects model for the main analyses. Our primary outcomes were perioperative mortality, serious adverse events, haemostatic efficacy, and health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were efficacy as sealant, adverse events considered non-serious, operating time, and length of hospital stay. We assessed the certainty of the evidence with GRADE and presented results in two summary of findings tables. MAIN RESULTS We included 22 trials (2945 participants) evaluating FBHAs versus no intervention or non-FBHAs; 19 trials with 2642 participants provided data for the meta-analyses. Twelve trials reported commercial funding, one trial reported no financial support, and nine trials provided no information on funding. Below we present the most clinically relevant outcome results, also displayed in our summary of findings table. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents versus no intervention Six trials (1001 participants) compared FBHAs with no intervention. One trial was at low risk of bias in all five domains, and all other trials were at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Two trials were at high risk of bias related to blinding. It is unclear if FBHAs compared with no intervention have an effect on perioperative mortality (RR 2.58, 95% CI 0.89 to 7.44; 4 trials, 782 participants), serious adverse events (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.05; 4 trials, 782 participants), postoperative transfusion (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.40; 5 trials, 864 participants), reoperation (RR 2.92, 95% CI 0.58 to 14.61; 2 trials, 612 participants), or postoperative bile leak (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.48; 4 trials, 782 participants), as the certainty of evidence was very low for all these outcomes. Fibrin-based haemostatic agents versus non-fibrin-based haemostatic agents Sixteen trials (1944 participants) compared FBHAs with non-FBHAs. All trials had at least one domain at high or unclear risk of bias. Twelve trials were at high risk of bias related to blinding. It is unclear if FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs have an effect on perioperative mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.72; 11 trials, 1436 participants), postoperative transfusion (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.25; 7 trials, 599 participants), reoperation (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.90; 3 trials, 358 participants), or postoperative bile leak (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.21; 9 trials, 1115 participants), as the certainty of evidence was very low for all these outcomes. FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs may have little or no effect on the risk of serious adverse events (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.03; 9 trials, 1176 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence for the outcomes in both comparisons (FBHAs versus no intervention and FBHAs versus non-FBHAs) was of very low certainty (or low certainty in one instance) and cannot justify the routine use of FBHAs to reduce blood loss in adult liver resection. While the meta-analysis showed a reduced risk of reoperation with FBHAs compared with non-FBHAs, the analysis was confounded by the small number of trials reporting the event and the risk of bias in all these trials. Future trials should focus on the use of FBHAs in people undergoing liver resection who are at particularly high risk of bleeding. Investigators should evaluate clinically meaningful and patient-important outcomes and follow the SPIRIT and CONSORT statements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah K Malik
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Aimen O Amer
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Samuel J Tingle
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Emily R Thompson
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steven A White
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Derek M Manas
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Colin Wilson
- Institute of Transplantation, The Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit, Newcastle University and Cambridge University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang M, Qin T, Zhang H, Li J, Deng X, Zhang Y, Zhao W, Fan Y, Li D, Chen X, Feng Y, Zhu S, Xing Z, Yu G, Xu J, Xie J, Dou C, Ma H, Liu G, Shao Y, Chen W, Liu J, Liu J, Yin X, Qin R. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score analysis of short- term outcomes. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:394. [PMID: 37138243 PMCID: PMC10157952 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10783-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery (LS) has been increasingly applied in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). In this study, we intend to compare the short-term outcomes of LS versus open operation (OP) for pCCA in a multicentric practice in China. METHODS This real-world analysis included 645 pCCA patients receiving LS and OP at 11 participating centers in China between January 2013 and January 2019. A comparative analysis was performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM) in LS and OP groups, and within Bismuth subgroups. Univariate and multivariate models were performed to identify significant prognostic factors of adverse surgical outcomes and postoperative length of stay (LOS). RESULTS Among 645 pCCAs, 256 received LS and 389 received OP. Reduced hepaticojejunostomy (30.89% vs 51.40%, P = 0.006), biliary plasty requirement (19.51% vs 40.16%, P = 0.001), shorter LOS (mean 14.32 vs 17.95 d, P < 0.001), and lower severe complication (CD ≥ III) (12.11% vs. 22.88%, P = 0.006) were observed in the LS group compared with the OP group. Major postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, biliary fistula, abdominal abscess, and hepatic insufficiency were similar between LS and OP (P > 0.05 for all). After PSM, the short-term outcomes of two surgical methods were similar, except for shorter LOS in LS compared with OP (mean 15.19 vs 18.48 d, P = 0.0007). A series subgroup analysis demonstrated that LS was safe and had advantages in shorting LOS. CONCLUSION Although the complex surgical procedures, LS generally seems to be safe and feasible for experienced surgeons. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05402618 (date of first registration: 02/06/2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Wang
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Tingting Qin
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Hang Zhang
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Jingdong Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Intestinal Diseases Research Institute of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, China
| | - Xiaxing Deng
- Department of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 310000, China
| | - Yuhua Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Wenxing Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, China
| | - Ying Fan
- Department of the Second General Surgery, Sheng Jing Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, 110000, China
| | - Dewei Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Xuemin Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 213003, China
| | - Yechen Feng
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Siwei Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410005, Hunan, China
| | - Zhongqiang Xing
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei, China
| | - Guangsheng Yu
- Shandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 27397 Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250022, China
| | - Jian Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Intestinal Diseases Research Institute of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, 637000, China
| | - Junjie Xie
- Department of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 310000, China
| | - Changwei Dou
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Hongqin Ma
- Department of General Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, China
| | - Gangshan Liu
- Department of the Second General Surgery, Sheng Jing Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, 110000, China
| | - Yue Shao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Weibo Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 213003, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Shandong Provincial Institute of Dermatology and Venereology, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 27397 Jingshi Road, Jinan, 250022, China.
| | - Jianhua Liu
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei, China.
| | - Xinmin Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, 410005, Hunan, China.
| | - Renyi Qin
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Efficacy of Extended Modification in Left Hemihepatectomy for Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison Between H12345'8'-B-MHV and H1234-B. Ann Surg 2023; 277:e585-e591. [PMID: 35129528 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to verify the prognostic impact of the tumor exposure at the liver transection margin (LTM) in left-sided perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and the impact of middle hepatic vein (MHV) resection on this exposure. BACKGROUND In perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, tumors are unexpectedly exposed at the LTM during left hemihepatectomy (LH). METHODS Patients who underwent LH for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma during 2002 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. LH was classified into conventional and extended types, which preserved and resected the MHVs, respectively. Positive LTM was defined as the involvement of invasive carcinoma at the liver transection plane and/or the adjacent Glissonean pedicle exposed. The clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes were compared between procedures. RESULTS Among 236 patients, conventional and extended LHs were performed in 198 and 38 patients, respectively. The LTM was positive in 31 (13%) patients, with an incidence of 14% versus 8% ( P = 0.432) and 24% versus 0% in advanced tumors ( P = 0.011). Tumor size ≥ 18 mm ( P = 0.041), portal vein invasion ( P = 0.009), and conventional LH ( P = 0.028) independently predicted positive LTM. In patients with negative LTM, the survival was comparable between the two groups: 60.4% versus 59.2% at 3 years ( P = 0.206), which surpassed 17.7% for those with positive LTM in the conventional group ( P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LTM status was an independent prognostic factor ( P = 0.009) along with ductal margin status ( P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS The LTM status is an important prognostic factor in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Extended LH reduced the risk of tumor exposure at the LTM with a subsequent improvement in the survival, particularly in advanced tumors.
Collapse
|
13
|
Gilbert TM, Hackett J, Holt L, Bird N, Quinn M, Gordon-Weeks A, Diaz-Nieto R, Fenwick SW, Malik HZ, Jones RP. Long-term morbidity after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A cohort study. Surg Oncol 2022; 45:101875. [DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
14
|
Hosokawa I, Furukawa K, Takayashiki T, Kuboki S, Takano S, Miyazaki M, Ohtsuka M. Surgical implications of the confluence patterns of the left intrahepatic bile ducts in right hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:460-468. [PMID: 34498387 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the most important goal in surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is to achieve tumor-free proximal ductal margins, little is known about the implications of confluence patterns of the left intrahepatic bile ducts for the proximal ductal margin status in right hepatectomy (RH) for PHC. METHODS Of 203 patients who underwent surgical resection for PHC with curative intent, confluence patterns of the left intrahepatic bile duct were evaluated in 94 consecutive patients who underwent RH, and they were classified into the following two types: normal type: the bile duct of segment 4 (B4) drained into the common trunk of the bile ducts of segment 2 (B2) and segment 3 (B3) at the right side of the umbilical portion of the left portal vein to form the left hepatic duct; and hepatic confluence type: B2 entered the common trunk of B3 and B4 at the hepatic confluence or B4 entered the common trunk of B2 and B3 at the hepatic confluence. The proximal ductal margin status following RH was compared between the two types of confluence patterns. RESULTS Of 94 consecutive patients, 69 (73%) were the normal type, and 25 (27%) were the hepatic confluence type. There were no significant differences in patients' characteristics, surgical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and histopathological features between the two groups. However, in patients with Bismuth-Corlette type II and IIIa PHC, the achievement rates of negative proximal ductal margins at the first dividing line were significantly higher in the hepatic confluence type group than in the normal type group (16/16 [100%] vs 34/52 [65%], respectively; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS Confluence patterns of the left intrahepatic bile ducts might affect proximal ductal margin status in RH for PHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isamu Hosokawa
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Katsunori Furukawa
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Takayashiki
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kuboki
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigetsugu Takano
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaru Miyazaki
- Narita Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jansson H, Olthof PB, Bergquist A, Ligthart MAP, Nadalin S, Troisi RI, Groot Koerkamp B, Alikhanov R, Lang H, Guglielmi A, Cescon M, Jarnagin WR, Aldrighetti L, van Gulik TM, Sparrelid E. Outcome after resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: an international multicentre study. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1751-1758. [PMID: 33975797 PMCID: PMC8720371 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) has been reported to lead to worse outcomes than resection for non-PSC pCCA. The aim of this study was to compare prognostic factors and outcomes after resection in patients with PSC-associated pCCA and non-PSC pCCA. METHODS The international retrospective cohort comprised patients resected for pCCA from 21 centres (2000-2020). Patients operated with hepatobiliary resection, with pCCA verified by histology and with data on PSC status, were included. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival and postoperative complications. RESULTS Of 1128 pCCA patients, 34 (3.0%) had underlying PSC. Median overall survival after resection was 33 months for PSC patients and 29 months for non-PSC patients (p = .630). Complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) were more frequent in PSC pCCA (71% versus 44%, p = .003). The rate of posthepatectomy liver failure (21% versus 17%, p = .530) and 90-day mortality (12% versus 13%, p = 1.000) was similar for PSC and non-PSC patients. CONCLUSION Median overall survival after resection for pCCA was similar in patients with underlying PSC and non-PSC patients. Complications were more frequent after resection for PSC-associated pCCA, with no difference in postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannes Jansson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annika Bergquist
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marjolein A P Ligthart
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HBP, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepato-biliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yamada M, Mizuno T, Yamaguchi J, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Onoe S, Watanabe N, Uehara K, Matsuo K, Ebata T. Superiority of clinical American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2021; 29:768-777. [PMID: 34717042 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical tumor staging is essential information for making a therapeutic decision in cancer. This study aimed to identify the optimal tumor classification system for predicting resectability and survival probability in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS Patients who were treated for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2009 and 2018 were enrolled. Local tumor extension was staged radiologically according to a diameter-based classification system in addition to the AJCC, Blumgart, and Bismuth systems. Survival and resectability were compared between T subgroups, and the discriminability of the four systems was assessed with Harrell's concordance index (C-index). RESULTS Among 702 study patients, 559 (80.0%) underwent laparotomy, 489 (70.0%) of whom underwent resection. The resectability significantly decreased for more advanced tumors in all systems (P < .001); the AJCC system had the greatest discriminability for resectability (area under the curve 0.721). Overall survival at 5 years was 69.9% for AJCC cT1, 45.8% for cT2, 31.8% for cT3, and 15.3% for cT4 tumors (cT1 vs cT2; P = .002, cT2 vs cT3; P = .008 and cT3 vs cT4; P < .001). The AJCC system had the largest C-index of 0.627. CONCLUSIONS The AJCC T system was the optimal classification system for predicting resectability and survival in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihoko Yamada
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Junpei Yamaguchi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yokoyama
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Igami
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Onoe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Watanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kay Uehara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ruzzenente A, Bagante F, Olthof PB, Aldrighetti L, Alikhanov R, Cescon M, Koerkamp BG, Jarnagin WR, Nadalin S, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M, Sparrelid E, Lang H, Iacono C, van Gulik TM, Guglielmi A. Surgery for Bismuth-Corlette Type 4 Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Results from a Western Multicenter Collaborative Group. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:7719-7729. [PMID: 33956275 PMCID: PMC8519825 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09905-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Although Bismuth-Corlette (BC) type 4 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is no longer considered a contraindication for curative surgery, few data are available from Western series to indicate the outcomes for these patients. This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes for patients with BC type 4 versus BC types 2 and 3 pCCA undergoing surgical resection using a multi-institutional international database. Methods Uni- and multivariable analyses of patients undergoing surgery at 20 Western centers for BC types 2 and 3 pCCA and BC type 4 pCCA. Results Among 1138 pCCA patients included in the study, 826 (73%) had BC type 2 or 3 disease and 312 (27%) had type 4 disease. The two groups demonstrated significant differences in terms of clinicopathologic characteristics (i.e., portal vein embolization, extended hepatectomy, and positive margin). The incidence of severe complications was 46% for the BC types 2 and 3 patients and 51% for the BC type 4 patients (p = 0.1). Moreover, the 90-day mortality was 13% for the BC types 2 and 3 patients and 12% for the BC type 4 patients (p = 0.57). Lymph-node metastasis (N1; hazard-ratio [HR], 1.62), positive margins (R1; HR, 1.36), perineural invasion (HR, 1.53), and poor grade of differentiation (HR, 1.25) were predictors of survival (all p ≤0.004), but BC type was not associated with prognosis. Among the N0 and R0 patients, the 5-year overall survival was 43% for the patients with BC types 2 and 3 pCCA and 41% for those with BC type 4 pCCA (p = 0.60). Conclusions In this analysis of a large Western multi-institutional cohort, resection was shown to be an acceptable curative treatment option for selected patients with BC type 4 pCCA although a more technically challenging surgical approach was required. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-09905-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ruzzenente
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Bagante
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepato-biliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele-IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruslan Alikhanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Calogero Iacono
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy.
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Park HJ, Han DH, Choi GH, Choi JS. Surgical outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma based on the learning curve of a single surgeon at a tertiary academic hospital: A retrospective study. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2021; 25:54-61. [PMID: 33649255 PMCID: PMC7952677 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims Although it is difficult to master the surgical learning curve for treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), there have been no studies on surgical outcomes between a novice and an experienced surgeon. Thus, the current study attempted to evaluate surgical outcomes from a single surgeon based on learning curve for surgical treatment of HCCA. Methods From January 2008 to December 2016, a single surgeon performed surgical treatment for 108 patients with HCCA at Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea. Among them, 101 patients with curative surgical resection were included in this study. The learning curve was assessed by a moving average graph and CUSUM method using operation time. Surgical outcomes between the early period group (EPG) and the late period group (LPG) were compared according to learning curve. Results Operation time (603.17±117.59 and 432.03±91.77 minutes; p<0.001), amount of bleeding during operation (1127.86±689.54 and 613.05±548.31 ml; p<0.001), and severe complication rates (47.6% and 27.1%, p=0.034) were significantly smaller in the LPG. There was no significant difference in R0 resection rate (85.7% and 76.3%; p=0.241) as well as long-term survival rate. Conclusions In this study, operation time, amount of bleeding during operation, length of hospital stay, and severe complication rate were improved after stabilization of the learning curve. However, R0 resection rate and survival outcomes were not significantly influenced by the learning curve for surgical treatment of HCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Jeong Park
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sub Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Giuliante F, Ardito F, Aldrighetti L, Ferrero A, Pinna AD, De Carlis L, Cillo U, Jovine E, Portolani N, Gruttadauria S, Mazzaferro V, Massani M, Rosso E, Ettorre GM, Ratti F, Guglielmi A, Cescon M, Colasanti M, Di Sandro S, Gringeri E, Russolillo N, Ruzzenente A, Sposito C, Zanello M, Zimmitti G. Liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of biliary drainage failure on postoperative outcome. Results of an Italian multicenter study. Surgery 2021; 170:383-389. [PMID: 33622570 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative biliary drainage may be essential to reduce the risk of postoperative liver failure after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, infectious complications related to preoperative biliary drainage may increase the risk of postoperative mortality. The strategy and optimal drainage method continues to be controversial. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter study including patients who underwent hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2000 and 2016 at 14 Italian referral hepatobiliary centers. The primary end point was to evaluate independent predictors for postoperative outcome in patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after preoperative biliary drainage. RESULTS Of the 639 enrolled patients, 441 (69.0%) underwent preoperative biliary drainage. Postoperative mortality was 8.9% (12.5% after right-side hepatectomy versus 5.7% after left-side hepatectomy; P = .003). Of the patients, 40.5% underwent preoperative biliary drainage at the first admitting hospital, before evaluation at referral centers. Use of percutaneous preoperative biliary drainage was significantly more frequent at referral centers than at community hospitals where endoscopic preoperative biliary drainage was the most frequent type. The overall failure rate after preoperative biliary drainage was 43.3%, significantly higher at community hospitals than that at referral centers (52.7% v 36.9%; P = .002). Failure of the first preoperative biliary drainage was one of the strongest predictors for postoperative complications after right-side and left-side hepatectomies and for mortality after right-side hepatectomy. Type of preoperative biliary drainage (percutaneous versus endoscopic) was not associated with significantly different risk of mortality. CONCLUSION Failure of preoperative biliary drainage was significantly more frequent at community hospitals and it was an independent predictor for postoperative outcome. Centers' experience in preoperative biliary drainage management is crucial to reduce the risk of failure that is closely associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio D Pinna
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of General Surgery, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, IRCCS, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Nazario Portolani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano (National Cancer Institute), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Italy
| | - Edoardo Rosso
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe M Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | | | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Colasanti
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Gringeri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Sposito
- General Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano (National Cancer Institute), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Department of General Surgery, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, IRCCS, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liang L, Li C, Jia HD, Diao YK, Xing H, Pawlik TM, Lau WY, Shen F, Huang DS, Zhang CW, Yang T. Prognostic factors of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality studies. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 14:2631774521993065. [PMID: 33629062 PMCID: PMC7882763 DOI: 10.1177/2631774521993065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Data on prognostic factors associated with outcome following resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma vary. We sought to define and characterize current available evidence on prognostic factors associated with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after resection. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were systematically searched for relevant studies published before December 2019. Prognostic factors were identified from multivariate regression analyses in studies. Only high-quality studies were included (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale > 6 stars). A total of 45 studies involving 7338 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis demonstrated that serum bilirubin levels (hazard ratio: 1.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-2.44), serum CA19-9 levels (hazard ratio: 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.65), tumor size (hazard ratio: 1.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.55), major vascular involvement (hazard ratio: 1.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-2.38), distance metastasis (hazard ratio: 17.60, 95% confidence interval: 2.01-154.09), perioperative blood transfusion (hazard ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-1.62), T-stage (hazard ratio: 1.96, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-2.61), lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.06, 1.83-2.31), resection margin status (hazard ratio: 2.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.89-2.89), not-well histology differentiation (hazard ratio: 2.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.69-2.44), perineural invasion (hazard ratio: 2.37, 95% confidence interval: 1.59-3.55), and lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio: 1.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-1.73) were prognostic factors for poorer overall survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.55) had a positive effect on prolonged overall survival. In addition, positive resection margin status (hazard ratio: 1.96, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-2.61) and lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.83-2.31) were associated with poorer disease-free survival. The prognostic factors identified in the present meta-analysis can be used to characterize patients in clinical practice and enrich prognostic tools, which could be included in future trial designs and generate hypotheses to be tested in future research to promote personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chao Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hang-Dong Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yong-Kang Diao
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hao Xing
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong-Sheng Huang
- Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Diagnosis and Individualized Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Cheng-Wu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tian Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Moghe A, Ganesh S, Humar A, Molinari M, Jonassaint N. Expanding Donor Selection and Recipient Indications for Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Clin Liver Dis 2021; 25:121-135. [PMID: 33978574 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2020.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
There is an acute shortage of deceased donor organs for liver transplantation in the United States. Nearly a third of patients either die or become too sick for transplant while on the transplant waitlist. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) bridges the gap between demand and supply of organs for liver transplantation. This article reviews current living donor selection criteria, and avenues for expansion of criteria with novel surgical techniques and ongoing outcomes research. Ways in which institutions can establish and expand LDLT programs using the Living Donor Champion model are discussed. Efforts to expand recipient indications for LDLT are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshata Moghe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Mezzanine Level, C-Wing, PUH 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. https://twitter.com/AkshataMoghe
| | - Swaytha Ganesh
- Living Donor Liver Transplantation Program, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Center for Liver Diseases, 3471 Fifth Avenue, 900 Kaufmann Building, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC Montefiore, Seventh Floor - N723, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Michele Molinari
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, UPMC Montefiore, N761, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Naudia Jonassaint
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Center for Liver Diseases, 3471 Fifth Avenue, 900 Kaufmann Building, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bari H, Wadhwani S, Dasari BVM. Role of artificial intelligence in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:7-18. [PMID: 33552391 PMCID: PMC7830072 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i1.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, enhanced preoperative imaging and visualization, improved delineation of the complex anatomical structures of the liver and pancreas, and intra-operative technological advances have helped deliver the liver and pancreatic surgery with increased safety and better postoperative outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) has a major role to play in 3D visualization, virtual simulation, augmented reality that helps in the training of surgeons and the future delivery of conventional, laparoscopic, and robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HPB) surgery; artificial neural networks and machine learning has the potential to revolutionize individualized patient care during the preoperative imaging, and postoperative surveillance. In this paper, we reviewed the existing evidence and outlined the potential for applying AI in the perioperative care of patients undergoing HPB surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassaan Bari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Sharan Wadhwani
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chu KKW, Wong KHC, Chok KSH. Expanding Indications for Liver Transplant: Tumor and Patient Factors. Gut Liver 2021; 15:19-30. [PMID: 32102130 PMCID: PMC7817931 DOI: 10.5009/gnl19265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Revised: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
During the past few decades, liver transplant has developed from a high-mortality procedure to an almost routine procedure with good survival outcomes. The development of living donor liver transplant has increased the availability of liver grafts, and the scope of indications for liver transplant has been expanding ever since. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of such an expansion of scope. Various criteria have been proposed to expand the eligibility of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding the Milan criteria for liver transplant. Furthermore, liver transplant is increasingly performed as a treatment modality for cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine liver metastasis and colorectal liver metastasis. The number of elderly patients receiving liver transplant is on the rise. Combined organ transplantation has also been adopted to treat patients with multiple organ failure. Going forward, further development of preoperative noninvasive predictors in tumor, patient and even donor factors is needed to identify patients at risk of poor outcomes and hence optimize patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Ka-Wan Chu
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Kenneth Siu-Ho Chok
- Department of Surgery and State Key Laboratory for Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tsukamoto T, Nobori C, Nishiyama T, Kunimoto T, Kaizaki R, Inoue T, Nishiguchi Y. Stent-graft placement for delayed extrahepatic portal hemorrhage after surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2020; 77:519-522. [PMID: 33395836 PMCID: PMC7704364 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.11.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Stent-graft placement is a viable option for treatment of portal vein hemorrhage. Postoperative hemorrhage was caused by extrahepatic portal vein pseudoaneurysm formation. Portal vein pseudoaneurysm occurred at the reconstructed portion.
Introduction Potential curative therapy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma requires extensive surgical treatment, which can still be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Postoperative hemorrhage from the portal vein is a rare but life-threatening complication. We herein report postoperative hemorrhage from an extrahepatic portal vein pseudoaneurysm successfully treated by stent graft placement late after surgical treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Presentation of case An 83-year-old man was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of jaundice. Based on radiological findings, we diagnosed the patient with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. After endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage, resection of the extrahepatic bile duct combined with extended left hemi-hepatectomy, including the caudate lobe, lymphadenectomy of the hepatoduodenal ligament, partial resection and reconstruction of the portal vein, and right hepaticojejunostomy was performed. Fourteen days postoperatively, bleeding through the abdominal drain around the portal vein was observed. Twenty days postoperatively, abdominal computed tomography revealed a portal vein pseudoaneurysm that had formed at the portion of reconstruction. Therefore, 24 days postoperatively, a stent graft placement of the pseudoaneurysm through the ileocolic vein was performed. Subsequently, the portal vein hemorrhage ceased. Discussion Our present postoperative extrahepatic portal vein hemorrhage case was caused by an extrahepatic portal vein pseudoaneurysm that had formed at the reconstructed portion by erosion due to the chemical effect of the leaking bile and mechanical irritation of the surgical drain adjacent to the portal vein. Conclusion Stent-graft placement is a minimally-invasive, safe, and effective treatment option for hemorrhage from postoperative portal vein pseudoaneurysm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadashi Tsukamoto
- Department of Surgery, Osaka City Juso Hospital, 2-12-27 Nonakakita, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532-0034, Japan.
| | - Chihoko Nobori
- Department of Surgery, Osaka City Juso Hospital, 2-12-27 Nonakakita, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532-0034, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Nishiyama
- Department of Surgery, Osaka City Juso Hospital, 2-12-27 Nonakakita, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532-0034, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Kunimoto
- Department of Surgery, Osaka City Juso Hospital, 2-12-27 Nonakakita, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532-0034, Japan
| | - Ryoji Kaizaki
- Department of Surgery, Osaka City Juso Hospital, 2-12-27 Nonakakita, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532-0034, Japan
| | - Toru Inoue
- Department of Surgery, Osaka City Juso Hospital, 2-12-27 Nonakakita, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532-0034, Japan
| | - Yukio Nishiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Osaka City Juso Hospital, 2-12-27 Nonakakita, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532-0034, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Geers J, Jaekers J, Topal H, Aerts R, Vandoren C, Vanden Boer G, Topal B. Predictors of survival after surgery with curative intent for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:286. [PMID: 33143698 PMCID: PMC7641817 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02060-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several clinicopathological predictors of survival after curative surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) have been identified; however, conflicting reports remain. The aim was to analyse clinical and oncological outcomes after curative resection of pCCA and to determine prognostic factors. Methods Eighty-eight consecutive patients with pCCA underwent surgery with curative intent between 1998 and 2017. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Twenty-one prognostic factors were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression models. Results Postoperative complications were observed in 73 (83%) patients of which 41 (47%) were severe complications (therapy-oriented severity grading system (TOSGS) grade > 2), including a 90-day mortality of 9% (n = 8). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 5 and 10 years after surgery were 33% and 19%, and 37% and 30%, respectively. Independent predictors of OS were locoregional lymph node metastasis (LNM) (risk ratio (RR) 2.12, confidence interval (CI) 1.19–3.81, p = 0.011), patient American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system > 2 (RR 2.10, CI 1.03–4.26, p = 0.043), and depth of tumour penetration (pT) > 2 (RR 2.58, CI 1.03–6.30, p = 0.043). The presence of locoregional LNM (RR 2.95, CI 1.51–5.90, p = 0.002) and caudate lobe resection (RR 2.19, CI 1.01–5.14, p = 0.048) were found as independent predictors of DFS. Conclusions Curative surgery for pCCA carries high risks with poor long-term survival. Locoregional LNM was the only predictor for both OS and DFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Geers
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Jaekers
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Halit Topal
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raymond Aerts
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cindy Vandoren
- Management Information & Registration, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guy Vanden Boer
- Management Information & Registration, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Baki Topal
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hau HM, Meyer F, Jahn N, Rademacher S, Sucher R, Seehofer D. Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3152. [PMID: 33003424 PMCID: PMC7599593 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In our study, we evaluated and compared the prognostic value and performance of the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). METHODS Patients undergoing liver surgery with curative intention for PHC between 2002 and 2019 were identified from a prospective database. Histopathological parameters and stage of the PHC were assessed according to the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification. The prognostic accuracy between staging systems was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) model. RESULTS Data for a total of 95 patients undergoing liver resection for PHC were analyzed. The median overall survival time was 21 months (95% CI 8.1-33.9), and the three- and five-year survival rates were 46.1% and 36.2%, respectively. Staging according to the 8th edition vs. the 7th edition resulted in the reclassification of 25 patients (26.3%). The log-rank p-values for the 7th and 8th editions were highly statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the 6th edition (p = 0.035). The AJCC 8th edition staging system showed a trend to better discrimination, with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52-0.84) compared to 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51-0.73) for the 7th edition. Multivariate survival analysis revealed male gender, age >65 years, positive resection margins, presence of distant metastases, poorly tumor differentiation, and lymph node involvement, such as no caudate lobe resection, as independent predictors of poor survival (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the current study, the newly released 8th edition of AJCC staging system showed no significant benefit compared to the previous 7th edition in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Further research may help to improve the prognostic value of the AJCC staging system for PHC-for instance, by identifying new prognostic markers or staging criteria, which may improve that individual patient's outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Michael Hau
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (F.M.); (S.R.); (R.S.); (D.S.)
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Felix Meyer
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (F.M.); (S.R.); (R.S.); (D.S.)
| | - Nora Jahn
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Sebastian Rademacher
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (F.M.); (S.R.); (R.S.); (D.S.)
| | - Robert Sucher
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (F.M.); (S.R.); (R.S.); (D.S.)
| | - Daniel Seehofer
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (F.M.); (S.R.); (R.S.); (D.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
The effect and safety of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an updated meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:174. [PMID: 32682432 PMCID: PMC7368977 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01904-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The effect and safety of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are still controversial; the aim of our study is to evaluate all aspects of PBD. Methods All included studies featured PBD versus non-PBD (NPBD) groups were from 1996 to 2019 and were extracted from Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Science Citation Index Expanded. Results Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. PBD may lead to a significantly higher incidence of overall morbidities (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53, 0.85; P = 0.0009) and intraoperative transfusions (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55, 0.94; P = 0.02); moreover, bile leakage (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.24, 1.41; P = 0.04), infection (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20, 0.47; P < 0.00001), and cholangitis (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.007, 0.48; P = 0.0007) are also related to PBD. However, NPBD was associated with more frequent hepatic insufficiency (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.15, 8.31; P = 0.03). In the subgroup meta-analysis, the differences in the outcomes of bile leakage and overall morbidity lost significance between the PBD and NPBD groups when the mean total serum bilirubin (TSB) concentration was above 15 mg/dl. Conclusion Meta-analysis demonstrated that compared to NPBD, PBD is associated with a greater risk of several kinds of infection and morbidities, but its ability to reduce postoperative hepatic insufficiency cannot be ignored. In patients with a high TSB concentration, PBD tends to be a better choice. However, these results need to be confirmed in a future prospective randomized trial with large samples to clarify the effects and find a specific TSB concentration for PBD.
Collapse
|
28
|
Transferability of Liver Transplantation Experience to Complex Liver Resection for Locally Advanced Hepatobiliary Malignancy - Lessons Learnt From 3 Decades of Single Center Experience. Ann Surg 2020; 275:e690-e697. [PMID: 32657940 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the impact of LT experience on the outcome of CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:: Despite evolution in LT knowledge and surgical techniques in the past decades, there is yet data to evaluate the significance of LT experience in performing CLR. METHODS Postoperative outcome after CLR between 1995 and 2019 were reviewed and correlated with LT experience in a single center with both LT and CLR service. CLR was defined as hepatectomy with vasculobiliary reconstruction, or multivisceral resection, central bisectionectomy (S4/5/8), or associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Spearman rank correlation and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to define the association between CLR-related outcomes and LT experience. RESULTS With cumulative single-center experience of 1452 LT, 222 CLR were performed during the study period [hepatectomy with biliary (27.0%), or vascular (21.2%) reconstruction, with multivisceral resections (9.9%), with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (18.5%)] mainly for hepatocellular carcinoma (53.2%), and hilar cholangiocarcinoma (14%). Median tumor size was 7.0 cm. Other features include macrovascular invasion (23.4%), and juxta-visceral invasion (14%). Major postoperative complication rate was 25.2% and mortality rate was 6.3%. CLR-complication rate was inversely associated with LT experience (R = -0.88, P < 0.005). Receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed the cutoff for LT experience to have the greatest influence on CLR was 95 with a sensitivity of 100% and Youden index of 1. Multivariable analysis showed that blood transfusion, prolonged operating time, LT experience </=95 were associated with major postoperative complications. CONCLUSION LT experience was complimentary to CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy with improved postoperative outcome.
Collapse
|
29
|
Mehrabi A, Khajeh E, Ghamarnejad O, Nikdad M, Chang DH, Büchler MW, Hoffmann K. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage in patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2020; 125:108897. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
30
|
Franken LC, Rassam F, van Lienden KP, Bennink RJ, Besselink MG, Busch OR, Erdmann JI, van Gulik TM, Olthof PB. Effect of structured use of preoperative portal vein embolization on outcomes after liver resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. BJS Open 2020; 4:449-455. [PMID: 32181590 PMCID: PMC7260406 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed to reduce the risk of liver failure and subsequent mortality after major liver resection. Although a cut‐off value of 2·7 per cent per min per m2 has been used with hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) for future remnant liver function (FRLF), patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) potentially benefit from an additional cut‐off of 8·5 per cent/min (not corrected for body surface area). Since January 2016 a more liberal approach to PVE has been adopted, including this additional cut‐off for HBS of 8·5 per cent/min. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of this approach on liver failure and mortality. Methods This was a single‐centre retrospective study in which consecutive patients undergoing liver resection under suspicion of PHC in 2000–2015 were compared with patients treated in 2016–2019, after implementation of the more liberal approach. Primary outcomes were postoperative liver failure (International Study Group of Liver Surgery grade B/C) and 90‐day mortality. Results Some 191 patients with PHC underwent liver resection. PVE was performed in 6·4 per cent (9 of 141) of the patients treated in 2000–2015 and in 32 per cent (16 of 50) of those treated in 2016–2019. The 90‐day mortality rate decreased from 16·3 per cent (23 of 141) to 2 per cent (1 of 50) (P = 0·009), together with a decrease in the rate of liver failure from 19·9 per cent (28 of 141) to 4 per cent (2 of 50) (P = 0·008). In 2016–2019, 24 patients had a FRLF greater than 8·5 per cent/min and no liver failure or death occurred, suggesting that 8·5 per cent/min is a reliable cut‐off for patients with suspected
PHC. Conclusion The major decrease in liver failure and mortality rates in recent years and the simultaneous increased use of PVE suggests an important role for PVE in reducing adverse outcomes after surgery for
PHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L C Franken
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F Rassam
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K P van Lienden
- Department Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J Bennink
- Department Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ishida T, Nara S, Akahoshi K, Takamoto T, Kishi Y, Esaki M, Hiraoka N, Shimada K. Left hepatic trisectionectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with a right-sided round ligament: A case report. World J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 12:68-76. [PMID: 32128030 PMCID: PMC7044109 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i2.68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A right-sided round ligament (RSRL) is a rare, congenital anomaly of the intrahepatic portal vein, with a reported frequency of 0.2%-1.2%. For patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma associated with an RSRL, an accurate understanding of the vascular and biliary anatomy is indispensable.
CASE SUMMARY We report a 70-year-old male with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma associated with an RSRL. After percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the left and anterior portal branches, we conducted a left trisectionectomy of the liver with extrahepatic bile duct resection and hepaticojejunostomy. The postoperative course was uneventful, and R0 resection was achieved. When the liver volume of each section was compared between 7 patients with an RSRL and 20 patients with normal portal vein anatomy, the posterior section in RSRL patients was significantly larger than that in patients with normal portal vein anatomy (median: 457 mL vs 306 mL, P = 0.031). In patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma associated with an RSRL, left trisectionectomy has several surgical advantages: (1) The posterior branch of the portal vein often ramifies independently, and the division of the portal vein is easily conducted; (2) A relatively large amount of remnant liver can be retained; and (3) The anatomy of the posterior branch of the Glissonian pedicle is similar to that in patients with normal anatomy.
CONCLUSION In patients with an RSRL and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma that does not involve the posterior section, left trisectionectomy may be a favorable choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Ishida
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Keiichi Akahoshi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takamoto
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Yoji Kishi
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Minoru Esaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Hiraoka
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Shimada
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kovalenko YA, Zharikov YO, Konchina NA, Gurmikov BN, Marinova LA, Zhao AV. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A different concept for radical resection. Surg Oncol 2020; 33:270-275. [PMID: 32561092 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term outcomes depend heavily on the possibility of performing radical resection. PURPOSE To evaluate long-term results in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) patients from the perspective of a new understanding of radical resection. METHODS Consecutive PHC patients who underwent surgical resection at A.V. Vishnevsky Center of Surgery from 2011 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty eight (87.9%) patients underwent hemihepatectomy (14 extended hemihepatectomies), while 2 (3%) underwent extrahepatic bile duct resection only, 6 (9.1%) underwent S4b, and 5 underwent en bloc resection of the extrahepatic bile duct. The influence of the bile duct wedge R status, nodal status, microvascular invasion, microlymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, liver invasion, and surrounding adipose tissue invasion on survival was tested by Cox's models. Survival rates depending on pathological parameter numbers were compared by log-rank tests. RESULTS Wedge resection, nodal status, microvascular invasion, microlymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, liver invasion, and surrounding adipose tissue invasion served as extended criteria for curability (R+, 1 to 7 parameters). For R0 resection status and R1 resection status (R+1, R+2), 7 and 5 parameters were negative, respectively. For R1+ resection status (R+3, R+4, R+5, R+6, R+7), 3 to 7 parameters were positive. Patients who underwent R0 and R1 resections had 5-year survival rates of 100%; the 1- 2- 3-year survival rates were 63%, 49%, 33% for patients who underwent R1+ resections, respectively. The expanded criteria for determining radical resection levels correlated with long-term outcomes (р = 0.0001). CONCLUSION The new concept for radical resection can accurately reflect surgical treatment results and contribute to selecting appropriate adjuvant therapies in PHC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was carried out in accordance with the framework of the "Multimodal treatment of primary and secondary malignant tumors of the liver and pancreas" (state registration № 315030310062).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yury Alexeevich Kovalenko
- Centre of Abdominal Surgery, A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
| | - Yury Olegovich Zharikov
- Department of Human Anatomy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation.
| | - Natalia Alexeevna Konchina
- Department of Human Anatomy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russian Federation.
| | - Beslan Nuralievich Gurmikov
- Centre of Abdominal Surgery, A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
| | - Ludmila Anatolievna Marinova
- Centre of Abdominal Surgery, A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
| | - Alexey Vladimirovich Zhao
- Centre of Abdominal Surgery, A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow, Russian Federation.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhao J, Zhang W, Zhang J, Chen YT, Ma WJ, Liu SY, Li FY, Song B. Independent Risk Factors of Early Recurrence After Curative Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Adjuvant Chemotherapy May Be Beneficial in Early Recurrence Subgroup. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:13111-13123. [PMID: 33376403 PMCID: PMC7764637 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s289094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In current clinical practice, early recurrence (ER) is not commonly discussed in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), and its risk factors for this disease have not been well clarified. We carried out this study to analyze the risk factors contributing to ER and explored the prognostic factors after curative resection for pCCA. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 335 consecutive pCCA patients were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors contributing to ER were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Prognostic factors of the ER group were determined by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. The overall survival (OS) rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Log rank test was used for OS comparison. RESULTS Of the 335 cases, 258 patients (77.0%) developed tumor recurrence, 136 patients (40.6%) developed ER, and 122 patients (36.4%) developed late recurrence (LR) postoperatively. The median OS of the ER and LR groups was 15 months and 36 months, respectively (P<0.001). The multivariate analysis revealed that poor pathological differentiation (P=0.006; moderate vs well, odds ratio [OR]=2.162, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.753-6.208, P=0.152; poor vs well, OR=4.839, 95% CI 1.544-15.170, P=0.007), perineural invasion (OR=4.797, 95% CI 1.586-14.510, P=0.005), and high levels of preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) (OR=2.205, 95% CI 1.208-4.026, P=0.010) were independent risk factors of developing ER after resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.383, 95% CI 0.154-0.953, P=0.039) remained as the independent protective factor of OS in patients with ER. CONCLUSION It is recommended that patients with poorly differentiated tumors, presence of perineural invasion, and high levels of preoperative CA19-9 receive closer follow-up and adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Zhao
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan610041, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Radiology, Armed Police Force Hospital of Sichuan, Leshan614000, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan610041, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Radiology, Armed Police Force Hospital of Sichuan, Leshan614000, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan610041, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yun-Tian Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan610041, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen-Jie Ma
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan610041, People’s Republic of China
| | - Si-Yun Liu
- GE Healthcare (China), Beijing100176, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan610041, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan610041, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Bin Song Email
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ebata T, Mizuno T, Yokoyama Y, Igami T, Yamaguchi J, Onoe S, Watanabe N, Nagino M. Predictive performance of Blumgart T staging for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in a Japanese center. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2019; 27:132-140. [PMID: 31654600 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Blumgart system has been used for local tumor assessment in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma to predict resectability and survival, and T3 tumors are considered unresectable disease. The aim was to validate the predictive performance of this system using a Japanese cohort. METHODS Medical records of consecutive patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Resectability, surgical procedure, R0 resection rate, and survival were compared among T stages. RESULTS Among 729 study patients, 191 patients had T1 tumors, 94 patients had T2 tumors, and 444 (60.9%) patients had T3 tumors according to the Blumgart T stage. Resection was performed in 513 (70.4%) patients; resectability rate decreased with the progression of T stage: 89.0% in T1, 79.8% in T2, and 60.4% in T3 tumors (P < 0.001). The incidences of left hepatic trisectionectomy and portal vein resection were 44.0% and 54.1%, respectively, in patients with T3 tumors, which were significantly greater than those of T1/2 tumors (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001). R0 resection reduced with advanced T stage: 92.4% in T1, 81.3% in T2, and 70.9% in T3 tumors (P < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate was 53.4%, 38.4%, and 19.7% in T1, T2, and T3 tumors, respectively (P < 0.001); that was 59.6%, 48.6%, and 30.7%, respectively, in the resected cohort (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Blumgart T stage was closely associated with the resectability rate, surgical procedures, R0 resection rate, and survival time, suggesting that the T stage works as well as a presurgical staging system. However, the unresectable classification of T3 tumors should be revised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yokoyama
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Igami
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Junpei Yamaguchi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Onoe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Watanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masato Nagino
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lu J, Li B, Li FY, Ye H, Xiong XZ, Cheng NS. Prognostic significance of mucinous component in hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120:1341-1349. [PMID: 31612493 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of mucinous component has been indicated to have a prognostic value in adenocarcinoma. However, little is known regarding the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) with mucinous component (HCM). METHODS Between January 1996 and December 2014, a total of 61 HCM patients who underwent curative-intent resection at West China Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival of these patients were compared with a large cohort of 217 surgically resected conventional HC patients during the same period. RESULTS The clinicopathological characteristics of HCM were distinct from conventional HC, including higher CA19-9 levels, larger tumor sizes, less differentiation, and a high frequency of liver parenchyma invasion, portal vein invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. HCM patients showed significantly worse recurrence-free survival (13.4 vs 23.9 months; P = .011) and overall survival (18.2 vs 32.1 months; P = .019) compared with conventional HC patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed liver parenchyma invasion, N stage, surgical margin, and histological grade as independent prognostic factors influencing overall survival in HCM patients. CONCLUSION HCM showed distinct clinicopathological features, more aggressive biological behaviors, and poor prognosis in comparison with conventional HC. Therefore, the mucinous component is an adverse prognostic factor for HC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiong Lu
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bei Li
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hui Ye
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xian-Ze Xiong
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Nan-Sheng Cheng
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee TC, Morris MC, Patel SH, Shah SA. Expanding the Surgical Pool for Hepatic Resection to Treat Biliary and Primary Liver Tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2019; 28:763-782. [PMID: 31472918 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2019.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Surgical management of primary liver and biliary tract tumors has evolved over the past several decades, resulting in improved outcomes in these malignancies with historically poor prognoses. Expansion of patient selection criteria, progress in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, development of techniques to increase future liver remnant, and the select utilization of liver transplantation have all contributed to increasing the patient pool for surgical intervention. Ongoing and future studies need to focus on improving multimodality treatment regimens and further refining the selection criteria for transplantation in order to optimize utilization of limited organ resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany C Lee
- Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0558, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558, USA
| | - Mackenzie C Morris
- Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0558, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0558, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558, USA
| | - Shimul A Shah
- Cincinnati Research on Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML 0558, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0558, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Matsukuma S, Tokumitsu Y, Shindo Y, Matsui H, Nagano H. Essential updates to the surgical treatment of biliary tract cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019; 3:378-389. [PMID: 31346577 PMCID: PMC6635684 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancer, which includes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer, is an intractable disease with a dismal prognosis. Prognosis is particularly poor in cases involving vessels or lymph nodes. Hepatobiliary pancreatic surgeons worldwide have consistently focused on improving surgical treatment, perioperative management, and chemotherapy to improve the outcomes of these diseases. There has been significant progress even in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018), such as promising findings reported by studies on the optimal extent of surgical treatment and multi-institutional randomized controlled trials on adjuvant chemotherapy. We overview the current trends and advancements made in surgical treatment in 2017 and 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Matsukuma
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Yukio Tokumitsu
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Yoshitaro Shindo
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Hiroto Matsui
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lu J, Li B, Li FY, Ye H, Xiong XZ, Cheng NS. Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilus versus hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection: Should they be recognized as perihilar cholangiocarcinoma or differentiated? EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2019; 45:2173-2179. [PMID: 31208772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is defined as tumors arising predominantly at or near the biliary confluence, potentially consisting of two types: hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the hepatic hilum (hICC). However, whether hICC and HC should be strictly distinguished or combined remains highly controversial. We aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics, prognostic factors and long-term outcome of hICC versus HC after curative-intent resection. METHODS Between January 1998 and June 2015, a total of 325 patients with hICC (n = 146) and HC (n = 179) who underwent curative-intent resection were enrolled. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Portal vein invasion, larger tumors, and later T stage were significantly more common in hICC group. A total of 110 (75.3%) hICC patients and 119 (66.5%) HC patients experienced tumor recurrences, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of hICC patients were significantly worse than those of HC patients (median RFS, 14.3 versus 22.7 months, P = 0.014; median OS, 21.7 versus 30.6 months, P = 0.032). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size, satellite nodules, surgical margin, and histological grade as independent factors for OS in hICC patients. On the other hand, the presence of liver parenchyma invasion, portal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, later N stage, and positive surgical margin were associated with shorter OS in HC patients. CONCLUSIONS hICC showed distinct clinicopathological features, more aggressive biological behaviors, different prognostic factors, and worse prognosis in comparison with HC. Therefore, making a strict distinction between hICC and HC is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiong Lu
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bei Li
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hui Ye
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xian-Ze Xiong
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Nan-Sheng Cheng
- Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Surgery for Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Newcastle upon Tyne Liver Unit experience. Eur Surg 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-019-0599-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
40
|
Wronka KM, Grąt M, Stypułkowski J, Bik E, Patkowski W, Krawczyk M, Zieniewicz K. Relevance of Preoperative Hyperbilirubinemia in Patients Undergoing Hepatobiliary Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8040458. [PMID: 30959757 PMCID: PMC6517893 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8040458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative hyperbilirubinemia is known to increase the risk of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to characterize the associations between the preoperative bilirubin concentration and the risk of postoperative mortality and severe complications to guide decision-making regarding preoperative biliary drainage. Eighty-one patients undergoing liver and bile duct resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2005 and 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Postoperative mortality and severe complications, defined as a Clavien⁻Dindo grade of ≥III, were the primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively. The severe postoperative complications and mortality rates were 28.4% (23/81) and 11.1% (9/81), respectively. Patients with preoperative biliary drainage had significantly lower bilirubin concentrations (p = 0.028) than did those without. The preoperative bilirubin concentration was a risk factor of postoperative mortality (p = 0.003), with an optimal cut-off of 6.20 mg/dL (c-statistic = 0.829). The preoperative bilirubin concentration was a risk factor of severe morbidity (p = 0.018), with an optimal cut-off of 2.48 mg/dL (c-statistic = 0.662). These results indicate that preoperative hyperbilirubinemia is a major risk factor of negative early postoperative outcomes of patients who undergo surgical treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma and may aid in decision-making with respect to preoperative biliary drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Maria Wronka
- Liver and Internal Medicine Unit, Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Michał Grąt
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Jan Stypułkowski
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Emil Bik
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Waldemar Patkowski
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Marek Krawczyk
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Krzysztof Zieniewicz
- Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Franken LC, Schreuder AM, Roos E, van Dieren S, Busch OR, Besselink MG, van Gulik TM. Morbidity and mortality after major liver resection in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2019; 165:918-928. [PMID: 30871811 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Morbidity and mortality after hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are known to be high. However, reported postoperative outcomes vary, with notable differences between Western and Asian series. We aimed to determine morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and assess differences in outcome regarding geographic location and hospital volume. METHODS A systematic review was performed by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through November 20, 2017. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analysis and metaregression were performed using a random effects model. RESULTS A total of 51 studies were included, representing 4,634 patients. Pooled 30-day and 90-day mortality were 5% (95% CI 3%-6%) and 9% (95% CI 6%-12%), respectively. Pooled overall morbidity and severe morbidity were 57% (95% CI 50%-64%) and 40% (95% CI 34%-47%), respectively. Western studies compared with Asian studies had a significantly higher 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and overall morbidity: 8% versus 2% (P < .001), 12% versus 3% (P < .001), and 63% versus 54% (P = .048), respectively. This effect on mortality remained significant after correcting for hospital volume. Univariate metaregression analysis showed no influence of hospital volume on mortality or morbidity, but when corrected for geographic location, higher hospital volume was associated with higher severe morbidity (P = .039). CONCLUSION Morbidity and mortality rates after major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma are high. The Western series showed a higher mortality compared with the Asian series, even when corrected for hospital volume. Standardized reporting of outcomes is necessary. Underlying causes for differences in outcomes between Asian and Western centers, such as differences in treatment strategies, should be further analyzed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte C Franken
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne Marthe Schreuder
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Roos
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Clinical Research Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Olthof PB, Miyasaka M, Koerkamp BG, Wiggers JK, Jarnagin WR, Noji T, Hirano S, van Gulik TM. A comparison of treatment and outcomes of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between Eastern and Western centers. HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:345-351. [PMID: 30087051 PMCID: PMC7534176 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) often requires extensive surgery which is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare an Eastern and Western PHC cohort in terms of patient characteristics, treatment strategies and outcomes including a propensity score matched analysis. METHODS All consecutive patients who underwent combined biliary and liver resection for PHC between 2005 and 2016 at two Western and one Eastern center were included. The overall perioperative and long-term outcomes of the cohorts were compared and a propensity score matched analysis was performed to compare perioperative outcomes. RESULTS A total of 210 Western patients were compared to 164 Eastern patients. Western patients had inferior survival compared to the East (hazard-ratio 1.72 (1-23-2.40) P < 0.001) corrected for age, ASA score, tumor stage and margin status. After propensity score matching, liver failure rate, morbidity, and mortality were similar. There was more biliary leakage (38% versus 13%, p = 0.015) in the West. CONCLUSION There were major differences in patient characteristics, treatment strategies, perioperative outcomes and survival between Eastern and Western PHC cohorts. Future studies should focus whether these findings are due to the differences in the treatment or the disease itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Mamoru Miyasaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | - Jimme K Wiggers
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam; Department of Surgery, OLVG West, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Takehiro Noji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Thomas M van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ji GW, Zhang YD, Wang K, Zhang H, Shao ZC, Jiang WJ, Li XC, Wang XH. Short- and long-term outcomes of middle hepatic vein-oriented hepatectomy for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:446-454. [PMID: 30098303 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of the middle hepatic vein (MHV)-oriented versus conventional hemihepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). METHODS From 2008 to 2017, medical records of patients undergoing hemihepatectomy with caudate lobectomy for advanced PHC were reviewed retrospectively. MHV-oriented hepatectomy was defined as full exposure of the MHV on the dissection plane. Predictors of morbidity and survival were identified. RESULTS A total of 125 patients were enrolled. MHV-oriented and conventional hepatectomies were performed in 44 and 81 patients, respectively. The curative resection rate, blood loss, transfusion, and survival were comparable between two groups; however, severe morbidity rate was significantly lower in the MHV-oriented group (9.1% vs 38.3%, P < 0.001). MHV-oriented approach was an independent predictor of severe morbidity, as were the age, bilirubin level, and blood transfusion. Severe morbidity was associated with significantly decreased overall survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (median 29.0 vs 46.9 months, P = 0.011 and 20.3 vs 31.1 months, P = 0.003, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that severe morbidity independently predicted shorter RFS (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS MHV-oriented approach for advanced PHC is safe and associated with a significant decrease in severe morbidity. Severe morbidity adversely affects survival after surgery; therefore, optimal preoperative preparation and MHV-oriented hepatectomy with meticulous dissection remain of critical importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gu-Wei Ji
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yao-Dong Zhang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ke Wang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zi-Cheng Shao
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wang-Jie Jiang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiang-Cheng Li
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xue-Hao Wang
- Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Blaga MM, Brasoveanu V, Stroescu C, Ionescu M, Popescu I, Dumitrascu T. Pattern of the First Recurrence Has No Impact on Long-Term Survival after Curative Intent Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinomas. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018; 2018:2546257. [PMID: 30158963 PMCID: PMC6109483 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2546257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To explore the pattern of the first recurrence and impact on long-term survival after curative intent surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (PHC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with curative intent surgery for PHC between 1996 and 2017 were analyzed. Survival times were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons were made with the log-rank test. RESULTS A number of 139 patients were included. The median overall survival was 26 months. A recurrence was observed in 86 patients (61.9%), during a median follow-up time of 89 months. The median disease-free survival was 21 months with 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year estimated recurrence rates of 38%, 60%, 69%, and 77%, respectively. A number of 57 patients (41%) developed distant only recurrence, while 26 patients (18.7%) presented local and distant recurrences. An isolated local recurrence was observed in 3 patients (2.2%). The median overall survival was 15 months for patients with local recurrence, 15 months for patients with liver metastases, and 17 months for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (p = 0.903) as the first recurrence. CONCLUSION Curative intent surgery for PHC is associated with high recurrence rates. Most patients will develop distant metastases, while an isolated local recurrence is uncommon. The pattern of recurrence does not appear to have a significant impact on survivals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madalina Maria Blaga
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dionisie Lupu No. 37, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vladislav Brasoveanu
- Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplant, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Fundeni No. 258, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- “Titu Maiorescu” University, Gheorghe Petrascu No. 67A, 031593 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cezar Stroescu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dionisie Lupu No. 37, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
- Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplant, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Fundeni No. 258, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihnea Ionescu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dionisie Lupu No. 37, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
- Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplant, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Fundeni No. 258, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irinel Popescu
- Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplant, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Fundeni No. 258, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- “Titu Maiorescu” University, Gheorghe Petrascu No. 67A, 031593 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Traian Dumitrascu
- “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dionisie Lupu No. 37, 030167 Bucharest, Romania
- Center of General Surgery and Liver Transplant, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Fundeni No. 258, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tang Z, Yang Y, Zhao Z, Wei K, Meng W, Li X. The clinicopathological factors associated with prognosis of patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e11999. [PMID: 30142840 PMCID: PMC6112994 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000011999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The refinement in surgical techniques combined with the preoperative management has improved the resectability rate of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the prognosis of pCCA with curative resection is still dismal. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the prognostic clinicopathological factors in resectable pCCA.PubMed, the Cochran Library, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science were searched systematically to identify reports focusing on studying the prognostic clinicopathological factors in resectable pCCA. The hazard ratios (HRs) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) from the identified studies using Cox proportional hazard regression model were extracted for overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) analysis.Three prospective and 35 retrospective cohort studies including 5681 resectable pCCA were included in the pooled analysis. Among more than 20 clinicopathological factors associated with negative survival of pCCA, only 6 were included in quantitative analysis which showed that lymph node involvement was associated with a reduced OS (HR = 2.04; 95%CI: 2.10-2.62), DSS (HR = 1.80; 95%CI: 1.39-2.34), DFS (HR = 4.38; 95%CI: 1.89-10.14), negative resection margin (HR = 2.04; 95%CI:1.73-2.41), operative transfusion (HR = 1.82; 95%CI: 1.06-3.11), and T3 or T4-stage (HR = 2.04; 95%CI: 2.04-2.53) were poor prognostic factors of OS, and poor or moderate differentiation was also an adverse prognostic factor of OS (HR = 2.71; 95%CI: 1.80-4.07) and DSS (HR = 1.74; 95%CI: 1.25-2.44). The overall median resectability rate (95CI%), R0 resection (95CI%), and 5-year OS (95CI%) in Eastern and Western countries were 74.9 (66.4-78.4) % and 41.3 (32.6-80.8) %, 70.7 (65.6-80.8) % and 75.9 (64.0-80.4) %, and 33.0 (29.7-39.7) % and 25.5 (20.0-31.6) %, respectively.Negative resection margin, lymph node involvement, poor or moderate differentiation grade was identified as the negative predictor factors of resectable pCCA. Operative transfusion and T3/T4 stage were also associated with a reduced survival of resectable pCCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zengwei Tang
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University
- Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou
| | - Yuan Yang
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University
| | | | - Kongyuan Wei
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University
| | - Wenbo Meng
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University
- Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou
| | - Xun Li
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University
- The Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
|
47
|
Ruzzenente A, Bagante F, Ardito F, Campagnaro T, Scoleri I, Conci S, Iacono C, Giuliante F, Guglielmi A. Comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 2018; 164:244-250. [PMID: 29801730 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2017] [Revised: 02/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The performances of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems of the 7th and 8th edition were compared using a cohort of patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma at 2 tertiary referral Italian hepatobiliary centers. METHODS The American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th and 8th edition staging systems were used to classify 214 patients who underwent surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The performances of the 2 staging systems were compared using the concordance index. RESULTS Using the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition staging system, we found that the 5-year overall survival for stages I, II, and IVa was 71%, 34%, and 34%, while no patients in stages IIIa, IIIb, and IVb survived 5 years. In comparison, when the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system was used, the 5-year overall survival was 71% and 35% in stages I and II, resulting in 23%, 19%, and 22% in stages IIIa, IIIb, and IIIc, respectively. Of note, no patients in stages IVa and IVb survived 5 years. The American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system had a slightly better discriminatory ability with a concordance index of 0.624 compared with 0.619 for the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition. CONCLUSION The newly released classification American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system demonstrated a poor to moderate ability to predict prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, which was only slightly better than the previous edition. Further refinements are needed to improve the prognostic ability of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, School of Medicine, Italy
| | - Fabio Bagante
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, School of Medicine, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Rome, School of Medicine, Italy
| | - Tommaso Campagnaro
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, School of Medicine, Italy
| | - Iole Scoleri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Rome, School of Medicine, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, School of Medicine, Italy
| | - Calogero Iacono
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, School of Medicine, Italy.
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Rome, School of Medicine, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, School of Medicine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Quinn LM, Dunne DFJ, Jones RP, Poston GJ, Malik HZ, Fenwick SW. Optimal perioperative care in peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma resection. Eur Surg 2018; 50:93-99. [PMID: 29875797 PMCID: PMC5968056 DOI: 10.1007/s10353-018-0529-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Surgical resection remains the only proven curative treatment for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Despite recent advances in liver surgery techniques and perioperative care, resection for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma remains associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Considerable variation in the perioperative management of these patients exists. Optimal perioperative management has the potential to deliver improved outcomes. This article seeks to summarize the evidence underpinning best practice in the perioperative care of patients undergoing resection of peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The authors also seek to identify areas where research efforts and future clinical trials should be targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard M. Quinn
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
- Institute of translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Ashton Street, L69 3GE Liverpool, UK
| | - Declan F. J. Dunne
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Robert P. Jones
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Graeme J. Poston
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Hassan Z. Malik
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen W. Fenwick
- Liverpool Hepatobiliary Centre, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, L9 7AL Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Naito Y, Kawahara A, Okabe Y, Ishida Y, Sadashima E, Murata K, Takase Y, Abe H, Yamaguchi T, Tanigawa M, Mihara Y, Kondo R, Kusano H, Nakayama M, Shimamatsu K, Yano H, Akiba J. SurePath ® LBC improves the diagnostic accuracy of intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Cytopathology 2018; 29:349-354. [PMID: 29723910 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The current study aimed to compare cytology using SurePath® (SP)-LBC and biliary tissue histology (BTH) for the diagnosis of biliary disease. METHODS Between January 2014 and December 2016, 57 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of biliary disease. Biliary cytological samples were processed using SP-LBC and subsequently BTH was performed. A final diagnosis was confirmed by surgery (23 malignant cases) and clinical follow-up (34 benign and malignant cases): 18 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; 17 intrahepatic/hilar cholangiocarcinoma (intra/H-CC); eight other malignant disease; and 14 benign biliary disease. The diagnoses made using SP-LBC and BTH were classified into four categories: (1) benign; (2) indeterminate; (3) suspicious for malignancy/malignant; and (4) inadequate. In addition, diagnostic accuracy was compared between SP-LBC and BTH. RESULTS Although 23% (13/57) of BTH samples were classified as inadequate, all SP-LBC cases were classified as adequate. Among 43 malignant cases, 11 normal, four indeterminate and 28 suspicious for malignancy/malignant were found using SP-LBC (26%, 9% and 65%, respectively), in contrast to 10 inadequate, nine normal, 10 indeterminate and 14 suspicious for malignancy/malignant observed using BTH (23%, 21%, 23%, and 33%, respectively). The identification of malignant cells was strikingly different between SP-LBC and BTH. Furthermore, limited to intra/H-CC, accuracy was significantly higher using SP-LBC than using BTH (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS SP-LBC of the biliary tract is a useful and reliable method for diagnosing biliary malignant disease and has an advantage over BTH for detecting malignant cells and accurately diagnosing intra/H-CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Naito
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan.,Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - A Kawahara
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - Y Okabe
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - Y Ishida
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - E Sadashima
- Shin-Koga Hospital, Medical Corporation Tenjinkai, Kurume, Japan
| | - K Murata
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - Y Takase
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - H Abe
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - T Yamaguchi
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - M Tanigawa
- Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - Y Mihara
- Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - R Kondo
- Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - H Kusano
- Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - M Nakayama
- Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - K Shimamatsu
- Department of Pathology, Omuta City Hospital, Omuta, Japan
| | - H Yano
- Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | - J Akiba
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chen KJ, Yang FC, Qin YS, Jin J, Zheng SS. Assessment of clinical outcomes of advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2018; 17:155-162. [PMID: 29636302 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low resectability and poor survival outcome are common for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA), especially in advanced stages. The present study was to assess the clinical outcome of advanced HCCA, focusing on therapeutic modalities, survival analysis and prognostic assessment. METHODS Clinical data of 176 advanced HCCA patients who had been treated in our hospital between January 2013 and December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Prognostic effects of clinicopathological factors were explored by univariate and multivariate analysis. Survival predictors were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS The 3-year overall survival rate was 13% for patients with advanced HCCA. Preoperative total bilirubin (P = 0.009), hepatic artery invasion (P = 0.014) and treatment modalities (P = 0.020) were independent prognostic factors on overall survival. A model combining these independent prognostic factors (area under ROC curve: 0.748; 95% CI: 0.678-0.811; sensitivity: 82.3%, specificity: 53.5%) was highly predictive of tumor death. After R0 resection, the 3-year overall survival was up to 38%. Preoperative total bilirubin was still an independent negative factor, but not for hepatic artery invasion. CONCLUSIONS Surgery is still the best treatment for advanced HCCA. Preoperative biliary drainage should be performed in highly-jaundiced patients to improve survival. Prediction of survival is improved significantly by a model that incorporates preoperative total bilirubin, hepatic artery invasion and treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang-Jie Chen
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Fu-Chun Yang
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Yun-Sheng Qin
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Shu-Sen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|