Surgical site infection risk in cesarean delivery patients with obesity after negative pressure wound therapy: A retrospective cohort study

Peripartum interventions for people with class III obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify evidence-based peripartum interventions for people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 2022 without date, publication type, or language restrictions.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Cohort and randomized controlled trials that implemented an intervention and evaluated peripartum outcomes of people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 were included. The primary outcome depended on the intervention but was commonly related to wound morbidity after cesarean delivery (ie, infection, separation, hematoma).

METHODS

Meta-analysis was completed for interventions with at least 2 studies. Pooled risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals and heterogeneity (I2 statistics) were reported.

RESULTS

Of 20,301 studies screened, 30 studies (17 cohort and 13 randomized controlled trials) encompassing 10 types of interventions were included. The interventions included delivery planning (induction of labor, planned cesarean delivery), antibiotics during labor induction or for surgical prophylaxis, 6 types of cesarean delivery techniques, and anticoagulation dosing after a cesarean delivery. Planned cesarean delivery compared with planned vaginal delivery did not improve outcomes according to 3 cohort studies. One cohort study compared 3 g with 2 g of cephazolin prophylaxis for cesarean delivery and found no differences in surgical site infections. According to 3 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials, there was no improvement in outcomes with a non-low transverse skin incision. Ten studies (4 cohort and 6 randomized controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Two randomized controlled trials compared subcuticular closure with suture vs staples after cesarean delivery and found no differences in wound morbidity within 6 weeks of cesarean delivery (n=422; risk ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.59; I2=9%). Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy was compared with standard dressing in 4 cohort and 4 randomized controlled trials, which found no differences in wound morbidity (cohort n=2200; risk ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.63; I2=66.1%) or surgical site infections (randomized controlled trial n=1262; risk ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.29; I2=0).

CONCLUSION

Few studies address interventions in people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2, and most studies did not demonstrate a benefit. Either staples or suture are recommended for subcuticular closure, but available data do not support prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after cesarean delivery for people with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy versus Standard of Care in Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been utilized to help manage closed incisions across many surgical specialties. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of ciNPT on postsurgical and health economic outcomes.

Methods

A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT to standard-of-care dressings between January 2005 and August 2021. Study participant characteristics, surgical procedure, dressings used, treatment duration, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Risk ratios summarized dichotomous outcomes. Difference in means or standardized difference in means was used to assess continuous variables reported on the same scale or outcomes reported on different scales/measurement instruments.

Results

The literature search identified 84 studies for analysis. Significant reductions in surgical site complication (SSC), surgical site infection (SSI), superficial SSI, deep SSI, seroma, dehiscence, skin necrosis, and prolonged incisional drainage were associated with ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Reduced readmissions and reoperations were significant in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05). Patients receiving ciNPT had a 0.9-day shorter hospital stay (P < 0.0001). Differences in postoperative pain scores and reported amounts of opioid usage were significant in favor of ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Scar evaluations demonstrated improved scarring in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05).

Discussion

For these meta-analyses, ciNPT use was associated with statistically significant reduction in SSCs, SSIs, seroma, dehiscence, and skin necrosis incidence. Reduced readmissions, reoperation, length of hospital stay, decreased pain scores and opioid use, and improved scarring were also observed in ciNPT patients.

Use of closed incision negative pressure wound therapy on C-section wounds in obese women

Rates of obesity in pregnant women are increasing. Obesity is linked to increased patient risk of developing postoperative wound complications such as surgical site infection, wound dehiscence and haematoma formation. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has been introduced as a prophylactic intervention to reduce caesarian section (C-section) wound complications. Evidence from randomised controlled trials and retrospective studies has shown variable rates of success in reducing risk of SSI. The studies reviewed in this article found that ciNPWT had no statistically significant impact in reducing rates of wound dehiscence and haematoma formation or increasing long-term satisfaction with the appearance of scar tissue following C-section. Further research into the use of cINPWT to prevent surgical site infection is needed to determine the effectiveness of this therapy in reducing this wound complication.

Effect of Fluid Resuscitation Strategies for Obese Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review

Purpose

As the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (2021) recommended, patients with sepsis should be given a liquid infusion of 30 ml/kg (ideal body weight). However, the strategy may result in insufficient resuscitation for obese patients with sepsis. Therefore, we conducted a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of the initial resuscitation strategy in obese sepsis patients.

Materials and methods

A computer search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and other databases collected cohort studies from the beginning of the survey to December 2021 to include articles evaluating initial resuscitation strategies for sepsis-obese patients.

Results

Of the six studies included, five used ideal body weight infusion strategies, and three used actual body weight infusion strategies. Differences in fluid volume were observed between the two strategies, but no significant difference was observed in the mortality of obese sepsis patients. In addition, there may be an infusion strategy other than the above two infusion methods, and the safety and efficacy of the new infusion strategy are unclear. The obesity paradox has been observed in most infusion strategies.

Conclusion

The association between obesity and infusion strategy has rarely been investigated in patients with sepsis and septic shock, and the existing results are conflicting. The risk of bias in all included studies was moderate or high. Before providing broad recommendations on the optimal first resuscitation approach to lower the chance of mortality, further clinical trials, and prospective research need to be done.