Screening for aspirin resistance in stable coronary artery patients by three different tests

Monitoring antiplatelet therapy: where are we now?

Single antiplatelet therapy represents the cornerstone of thrombosis prevention in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor, is the standard of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing both coronary and peripheral percutaneous interventions. Recent data suggest the efficacy of DAPT also after minor stroke. In this setting, a large body of evidence has documented that genetic and acquired patients' characteristics may affect the magnitude of platelet inhibition induced by antiplatelet agents. The implementation of tools allowing the identification and prediction of platelet inhibition has recently been shown to improve outcomes, leading to an optimal balance between antithrombotic efficacy and bleeding risk. We are therefore clearly moving towards tailored antiplatelet therapy. The aim of this paper is to summarize the available evidence on the evaluation of platelet inhibition in patients with coronary, peripheral, or cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. We will here focus on antiplatelet therapy based on both aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors. In addition, we provide practical insights into the clinical settings in which it appears reasonable to implement antiplatelet therapy monitoring.

Role of Dipyrone in the High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity amongst Acetylsalicylic Acid-Treated Patients Undergoing Peripheral Artery Revascularisation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of dipyrone on sensitivity to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) in patients who underwent peripheral artery vascular reconstruction.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Impedance aggregometry and light transmission aggregometry were used to determine the effects of dipyrone on ASA treatment in 21 patients. Blood samples were drawn in a 7-day period after the surgery. The cut-off value for high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was set at < 65% of aggregation inhibition for impedance aggregometry. For light transmission aggregometry the cut-off value for arachidonic acid-induced aggregation was set at > 20% of aggregating platelets, and the cut-off value for epinephrine-induced aggregation was > 44% of aggregating platelets. The cut-off value for each method was derived from a large number of patients treated with a daily dose of 100 mg of ASA.

RESULTS

We found HTPR in 14 (67%) of the 21 patients. None had primary resistance to ASA, i.e., after the addition of ASA in vitro all samples showed antiplatelet efficacy. Regression analysis showed a possible correlation between lower efficacy of ASA treatment and higher daily doses of dipyrone (p = 0.005 for impedance aggregometry, p = 0.04 for light transmission aggregometry), higher platelet count (p = 0.005 for impedance aggregometry), and shorter time from surgery (p = 0.03 for impedance aggregometry).

CONCLUSION

HTPR occurs in 67% of ASA-treated patients after lower limb vascular surgery. The occurrence of HTPR correlates with the daily dose of dipyrone. Therefore, dipyrone should not be used as a postoperative analgesic in ASA-treated patients after peripheral artery revascularisation due to its influence on the effectiveness of ASA.

New single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with differences in platelet reactivity and their influence on survival in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with acetylsalicylic acid: an observational study

AIMS

Genetic polymorphisms may contribute to platelet reactivity in diabetic patients; however, the information on their influence on long-term antiplatelet therapy is lacking. Our aim was to evaluate the role of previously described genetic variants and platelet reactivity on risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from 303 Caucasian patients. Genome-wide genotyping was performed using Illumina Human Omni 2.5-Quad microarrays, and individual genotyping of selected SNPs was performed using a custom Sequenom iPLEX assay in conjunction with the Mass ARRAY platform. Platelet reactivity was measured with VerifyNow Aspirin Assay and PFA-100 Assay. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of genetic variants and platelets reactivity on risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

Among the 237 patients included in the follow-up, death from any cause occurred in 34 (14.3%) patients and cardiovascular events occurred in 51 (21.5%) patients within a median observation time of 71 months (5.9 years). In univariate analyses, significant association in the presence of minor alleles in TXBA2R (rs1131882) with primary (HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.15-5.60, p = 0.021) and secondary endpoint (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.06-4.04, p = 0.034) was observed. In addition, multivariate analyses revealed the impact of this polymorphism on primary (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.09-5.00, p = 0.029) and secondary endpoint (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.00-3.57, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the study demonstrate for the first time an association between genetic polymorphism within TXBA2R gene encoding platelet's surface receptor and long-term survival of diabetic patients treated with ASA.

Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor is Related to Platelet Reactivity but not to Genetic Polymorphisms within BDNF Encoding Gene in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between serum concentrations of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), platelet reactivity and inflammatory markers, as well as its association with BDNF encoding gene variants in type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM) during acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) therapy.

Material/Methods

This retrospective, open-label study enrolled 91 patients. Serum BDNF, genotype variants, hematological, biochemical, and inflammatory markers were measured. Blood samples were taken in the morning 2–3 h after the last ASA dose. The BDNF genotypes for selected variants were analyzed by use of the iPLEX Sequenom assay.

Results

In multivariate linear regression analysis, CADP-CT >74 sec (p<0.001) and sP-selectin concentration (p=0.03) were predictive of high serum BDNF. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, CADP-CT >74 sec (p=0.02) and IL-6 concentration (p=0.03) were risk factors for serum BDNF above the median. Non-significant differences were observed between intronic SNP rs925946, missense SNP rs6265, and intronic SNP rs4923463 allelic groups and BDNF concentrations in the investigated cohort.

Conclusions

Chronic inflammatory condition and enhanced immune system are associated with the production of BDNF, which may be why the serum BDNF level in T2DM patients with high platelet reactivity was higher compared to subjects with normal platelet reactivity in this study.

A brief review on high on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity

Although aspirin is effective in secondary prevention in coronary heart disease, new thromboembolic events in patients on aspirin are frequently seen. In trials on aspirin-treated patients, platelet function tests have revealed large variability in platelet aggregation. This phenomenon has been named aspirin resistance, aspirin non-responsiveness or high-on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity. The mechanism of aspirin antiplatelet effect is due to the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 enzyme in platelets. In some trials, almost all patients on aspirin have a very low level of serum thromboxane B2, indicating that the measured platelet reactivity in aspirin-treated patients might be due to platelet activation via other pathways, such as ADP or thrombin. The prevalence of real aspirin resistance seems to be very low, and probably the term "high-on-aspirin residual platelet reactivity" should be preferred to describe this phenomenon.

New single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with differences in platelets reactivity in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with acetylsalicylic acid: genome-wide association approach and pooled DNA strategy

The objective of this study was to use genome-wide association approach and pooled DNA strategy to search for new genomic loci associated with inter-individual differences in platelet reactivity in the diabetic patients during acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) treatment. Study cohort consisted of 297 diabetic patients who had been taking ASA (75 mg daily) for at least 3 months. We tested association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped using high density microarray platform with several platelet reactivity assays, followed by individual genotyping of most significant SNPs identified in the microarray genomic scan. The highest statistical significance (p value of 0.0001-0.008 in individual genotyping) was observed for SNP located within the regulatory G-protein signaling (RGS) 7 gene (rs2502448) using recessive genetic model. The diabetic patients on ASA treatment and homozygotes for its minor allele were characterized by increased odds ratio of at 3.45 (confidence interval: 1.82-6.53) for high on ASA platelet reactivity (i.e. impaired ASA response) when compared with homozygotes for wild-type allele. The genome-wide approach might provide an opportunity to identify novel candidate genes and pathways related to platelet activation in diabetic patients.

Effect of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in acetylsalicylic acid metabolic pathway genes on platelet reactivity in patients with diabetes

Background

Platelet reactivity in patients on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) therapy can be influenced by physiological or pathological conditions affecting ASA pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. The mechanism of such variability in the therapeutic response to ASA, particularly in diabetic patients, is poorly understood. The rate of elimination of ASA and its metabolite, salicylic acid (SA), is likely a major factor determining drug efficacy. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of genetic polymorphisms in the selected candidate genes within the ASA metabolic pathway on the platelet reactivity and concentration of ASA and thromboxane A₂ (TxA₂) metabolites in a population of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Material/Methods

The study cohort consisted of 287 Caucasians with T2DM who had been taking ASA tablets at the dose of 75 mg per day for at least 3 months. Platelet reactivity analyses were performed using VerifyNow Aspirin and PFA-100 assays. The measured ASA metabolite included salicylic acid (ASA), and TxA₂ metabolites included serum TxB₂ and urinary 11-dh-TxB₂. Genotyping for the selected 18 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 5 genes of the ASA metabolic pathway was performed using a Sequenom iPLEX platform.

Results

No statistically significant association was observed between the investigated SNPs genotypes, platelet reactivity, and measured metabolites in the investigated cohort of patients.

Conclusions

The results of our study failed to confirm that the selected variants in the genes within the ASA metabolic pathway might contribute to platelet reactivity in a diabetic population treated with ASA.

A contemporary viewpoint on 'aspirin resistance'

Aspirin is an irreversible inhibitor of platelet prostaglandin synthase activity, and is the most widely prescribed drug for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. In recent years, clinical and laboratory evidence has shown significant individual variability in the response to aspirin and its link to clinical outcome. The term 'aspirin resistance' has been introduced to describe situations when clinical or ex-vivo effects of aspirin are less than expected. The accumulating evidence of increased risk of major adverse clinical events (MACE) associated with 'aspirin resistance' in the settings of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stroke, and peripheral arterial disease has stimulated the search for ways of overcoming aspirin resistance. Existence of the link between high on-treatment platelet reactivity and atherothrombotic events suggests the common mechanisms for atherosclerosis progression and thrombotic complications with the platelets, being a key cellular interface between coagulation and inflammation. This review article provides a contemporary view on 'aspirin resistance' and discusses its definition, clinical importance, and possible mechanisms in light of recent data on the role of platelets in atherothrombosis.

Genetic determinants of platelet reactivity during acetylsalicylic acid therapy in diabetic patients: evaluation of 27 polymorphisms within candidate genes

AIMS

Decreased platelet responsiveness to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) reported previously in diabetic patients could be attributed to patient-based, clinical, genetic and cellular factors. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of the genomic polymorphism on the platelet reactivity in diabetic patients treated with ASA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 295 Caucasians with diabetes type 2 who had been taking ASA tablets at the dose of 75 mg per day for at least 3 months for primary or secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI). Platelet reactivity analyzes were performed using VerifyNow ASA and PFA-100 assays. Genotyping for the selected 27 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 19 genes was performed using a Sequenom iPLEX platform. The results indicate that the statistically significant differences in platelet reactivity were observed in the PFA-100 assay for SNPs in following genes: TXBA2R (rs1131882), ADRA2A (rs4311994), PLA2G7 (rs7756935) and 9p21.3 (rs10120688) (P = 0.02, P = 0.03, P = 0.02, P = 0.03, respectively, all significance levels corrected for multiple comparisons). When using the VerifyNow ASA test, a weak nominal statistical significance (i.e. before multiple comparison testing) was observed for two SNPs in the GPVI gene: rs1671152 and rs1613662 [P = 0.025 (0.5) for both SNPs, corrected for multiple comparisons test].

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the present study suggest that the four analyzed genes may contribute to platelet reactivity measured with the PFA-100 assay in the diabetic population treated with ASA.

Aspirin and antiplatelet agent resistance: implications for prevention of secondary stroke

Oral antiplatelet drugs, including aspirin, clopidogrel and extended-release dipyridamole, are widely prescribed for the secondary prevention of vascular events, including stroke. Despite the benefits of antiplatelet therapy, 10−20% of patients experience a recurrent vascular event while taking antiplatelet medication. This article discusses the concept of antiplatelet resistance in general, focusing on aspirin resistance in particular, as a poorly defined cause of recurrent vascular events. Factors such as the lack of a standardized method to diagnose aspirin resistance and a poor clinical correlation with laboratory assays make the treatment of aspirin nonresponders difficult. In addition, there are confounding conditions such as diabetes mellitus that can affect aspirin resistance and determine a different course of treatment for these patients. Other antiplatelet options may also have resistant subpopulations; thus, alternative strategies for the secondary stroke patient must be explored.

Dose-related effect of aspirin on laboratory-defined platelet aggregation and clinical outcome after coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is widely used in the secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. There is controversy regarding the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with coronary artery disease and the effect of dose on resistance. Our primary aims were to determine the degree of platelet responsiveness to aspirin, and to study the influence of dose on platelet inhibition and clinical outcomes after coronary stenting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively studied the effect of aspirin on platelet function in 106 stable outpatients 6 months after successful percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Participants were randomized in a double-blind, double-crossover study (80 or 500 mg per day for 6 months). The platelet response to aspirin was determined by 10 micromol/L adenosine-5-diphosphate-induced aggregation with light transmission aggregometry. The clinical outcome was determined by single photon emission computed tomography with Tc-99m, and major adverse cardiac events were recorded (myocardial infarction, death, unstable angina or need for revascularization). In both groups 30.2% of the participants were resistant to aspirin. There was no significant difference between the dose of 80 mg compared to 500 mg aspirin in the incidence of aspirin resistance (P= 0.3). No correlation was found between aspirin resistance and clinical outcome (P= 0.4). Female sex and smoking were strongly associated with aspirin resistance.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of aspirin resistance is not dependent on the dose of aspirin. Female sex and smoking were the strongest predictors of aspirin resistance. Aspirin resistance is not a predictor of poor clinical outcome in patients who received double antiplatelet therapy.

The GPIIIa PlA polymorphism and the platelet hyperactivity in Tunisian patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with aspirin

BACKGROUND

Various genetic polymorphisms have been proposed to explain the persistent platelet hyperactivity (HPR) under aspirin treatment. PlA polymorphism of platelet GPIIIa receptor has been largely studied. However, its influence on platelet sensitivity to aspirin remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this prospective study is to investigate whether this PlA polymorphism is associated with a greater prevalence of HPR in stable coronary artery disease patients Material and Methods: 188 stable coronary artery disease patients were included. Platelet aspirin inhibitory effect was determined with PFA-100 using Collagen/Epinephrine closure time (CEPI-CT). A CEPI-CT<160sec was defining the HPR status. GPIIIa PlA polymorphism was established using polymerase chain reaction and classical restriction fragments length polymorphism.

RESULTS

The observed frequencies of different genotypes were not different from those predicted by the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium: PlA1/lA1 (55.3%), PlA1/PlA2 (39.4%) and PlA2/PlA2 (5.3%). HPR patients with inadequate aspirin inhibition were significantly more often homozygous PlA1/A1 (65.4% vs. 47.7%, p=0.015). After multivariate analysis, PlA1/A1 genotype was the only independent risk factor for persistent HPR (OR: 2.07; 95% CI [1.14 to 3.76; p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

In CAD patients receiving daily low dose of aspirin, there is a significant and independent association between the expression of GPIIIa PlA1 allele and the occurrence of persistent HPR detected with PFA-100.

Antiplatelet effect of once- or twice-daily aspirin dosage in stable coronary artery disease patients with diabetes

The aim of this pilot study was to compare the effect of two different regimens of aspirin dosage on platelet of coronary artery disease (CAD) diabetic patients. Twenty-five CAD diabetic patients were included. Initially, all patients received aspirin 100 mg/day for 10 days. At day 10, aspirin antiplatelet effect was determined by measuring the collagen/epinephrine closure time (CT) 2 h after the last aspirin dosage and the next morning at 8 a.m.. The aspirin regimen was modified to 100 mg twice daily for patients showing a non-optimal platelet-inhibitory effect (CT < 298 s at 8 a.m.). Persistent high platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined by a CT < 160 s. During the 100 mg/day aspirin regimen, the prevalence of HPR at 8 a.m. was 48%, and only 7 patients (28%) had showed an optimal platelet-inhibitory effect. Bridging to the twice-daily regimen, the HPR was significantly reduced (p=0.025), and the optimal platelet-inhibitory effect was reached for 3 other patients. Our results showed that 100 mg aspirin twice-daily dosing rather than a once-daily dose significantly improves the aspirin effect on platelet of CAD diabetic patients. However, large prospective studies were needed to confirm whether this strategy will be clinically relevant and safe.

Anesthetic concerns for patients with coagulopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients often receive preoperative therapies that interfere with hemostasis, and can present for surgery with underlying hemostatic disorders because of pre-existing preoperative anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative bleeding can occur following surgery due to multiple causes; however, the addition of pharmacologic agents creates an acquired defect that complicates the surgical injury and may result in increased blood loss. An understanding of the potential impact of anticoagulation therapies on hemostasis is critical in managing these patients. Further, newer agents are evolving in clinical practice that clinicians should be aware of.

RECENT FINDINGS

The anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents that patients are receiving preoperatively apart from unfractionated heparin include low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs); a pentasaccharide (fondaparinux); oral anticoagulants: vitamin K antagonists (warfarin), new oral Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixiban), or the oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) dabigatran; platelet inhibitors: thienopyridines (clopidogrel, ticlopidine, prasugrel) or IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists (tirofiban, abciximab, eptifibatide); or DTIs (r-hirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban).

SUMMARY

There are multiple pharmacologic therapies that surgical patients may be exposed to preoperatively, although there are currently few available methods to antagonize their effects. Often therapeutic prohemostatic pharmacologic approaches are used to treat or prevent bleeding, in addition to transfusional therapies.

Clinical importance of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance

Aspirin and clopidogrel are important components of medical therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes, for those who received coronary artery stents and in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke. Despite their use, a significant number of patients experience recurrent adverse ischaemic events. Interindividual variability of platelet aggregation in response to these antiplatelet agents may be an explanation for some of these recurrent events, and small trials have linked "aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance", as measured by platelet function tests, to adverse events. We systematically reviewed all available evidence on the prevalence of aspirin/clopidogrel resistance, their possible risk factors and their association with clinical outcomes. We also identified articles showing possible treatments. After analyzing the data on different laboratory methods, we found that aspirin/clopidogrel resistance seems to be associated with poor clinical outcomes and there is currently no standardized or widely accepted definition of clopidogrel resistance. Therefore, we conclude that specific treatment recommendations are not established for patients who exhibit high platelet reactivity during aspirin/clopidogrel therapy or who have poor platelet inhibition by clopidogrel.

Serum thromboxane B2 compared to five other platelet function tests for the evaluation of aspirin effect in stable cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

To assess the role of serum thromboxane B(2) (TXB(2)) measurements and the correlation between platelet function studies, in patients with stable cardiovascular disease on aspirin or clopidogrel.

METHODS

76 patients (47 on aspirin, 16 clopidogrel, 13 both) underwent assessment of TXB(2), whole blood aggregometry (WBA) after stimulation with (i) arachidonic acid (0.5mM), (ii) ADP (5 microM), (iii) collagen (1 and 5 microg/ml), PFA-100, and Cone and Plate Analyzer. Clopidogrel patients were additionally assessed by the VerifyNow System.

RESULTS

TXB(2) values ranged between 0.2 and 56.2 ng/ml, with significant separation between those taking aspirin, clopidogrel and controls (0.45 ng/ml vs 6.85 ng/ml vs 12.97 ng/ml, p<0.001). There was moderate correlation between WBA-AA and TXB(2) (r=0.487, p<0.001), PFA-100((R)) (r=0.599, p<0.001), WBA-Col1 (r=0.424, p<0.001), WBA-Col1:5 (r=0.417, p<0.001), and between TXB(2) and PFA-100((R)) (r=0.509, p<0.001). The prevalence of aspirin non-responders for WBA-AA, TXB(2), PFA-100((R)), CPA and Coll1:5 was 13.1%, 8.2%, 14.8%, 9.7% and 16.4% respectively. Individual patients were not consistently classified as aspirin non-responders in all tests. Those with inadequate aspirin response on > or =3 tests had higher TXB(2) levels (mean 1.57+/-1.66, range 0.553-4.45 vs mean 0.45+/-0.18, range 0.23-1.50) (p=0.001). Clopidogrel suppressed TXB(2) (p=0.02), WBA-AA (p<0.001), WBA-Col1 (p=0.012) and WBA-ADP (p<0.001) compared to controls. TXB(2) in patients ingesting fish oil tablets was lower compared to those without (0.4 ng/ml vs 0.52 ng/ml, p=0.004). Obesity was associated with higher TXB(2) values (0.61 vs 0.41, p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Serum TXB(2) measurements are a direct measure of the pharmacological effect of aspirin, are easily performed and correlate with other measures of platelet function. Serum TXB(2) measurements could be a useful sole measure of aspirin non-response, and may be even more predictive when performed in tandem with a global measure of platelet function. Aspirin and clopidogrel both suppressed several platelet pathways.

Aspirin resistance: focus on clinical endpoints

INTRODUCTION

Via its antiplatelet effect, aspirin reduces the odds of an arterial thrombotic event in high-risk patients by approximately 25%. However, 10% to 20% of patients with an arterial thrombotic event who are treated with aspirin have a recurrent arterial thrombotic event during long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of aspirin has been questioned by the emergence of the concept of aspirin resistance, which has been introduced as an explanation of the fact that a considerable proportion of patients treated with aspirin exhibit normal platelet function.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed all available evidence till March 2008 on prevalence of aspirin resistance and its association with clinical outcome. We also collected articles showing the possible way of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Analyzing the data of different laboratory methods aspirin resistance seems to be associated with poor clinical outcome, although currently no standardized or widely accepted definition of aspirin resistance exists. The widely used laboratory methods might not be comparable with each other; therefore, specific treatment recommendations for patients who exhibit high platelet reactivity during aspirin therapy or who have poor platelet inhibition by aspirin are not established.