1
|
Kang HY, Choe EK. Clinical Strategies in Gene Screening Counseling for the Healthy General Population. Korean J Fam Med 2024; 45:61-68. [PMID: 38528647 DOI: 10.4082/kjfm.23.0254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The burgeoning interest in precision medicine has propelled an increase in the use of genome tests for screening purposes within the healthy population. Gene screening tests aim to pre-emptively identify those individuals who may be genetically predisposed to certain diseases. However, as genetic screening becomes more commonplace, it is essential to acknowledge the unique challenges it poses. A prevalent issue in this regard is the occurrence of falsepositive results, which can lead to unnecessary additional tests or treatments, and psychological distress. Additionally, the interpretation of genomic variants is based on current research evidence, and can accordingly change as new research findings emerge, potentially altering the clinical significance of these variants. Conversely, a further prominent concern regards false assurances in genetic testing, as genetic tests can yield false-negative results, potentially posing a significant clinical risk. Moreover, the results obtained for the same disease can vary among different genetic testing services, due to differences in the types of variants assessed, the scope of tests, analytical methods, and the algorithms used for predicting diseases. Consequently, whereas genetic testing holds significant promise for the future of medicine, it poses unique challenges. If conducted without a full understanding of its implications, genetic testing may fail to achieve its purpose potentially hindering effective health management. Therefore, to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the implications of genetic testing within the general population, sufficient discussion and careful consideration should be given to counseling based on gene test results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hae Yeon Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Choe
- Department of Surgery, Healthcare Research Institute, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kolobkov D, Mishra Sharma S, Medvedev A, Lebedev M, Kosaretskiy E, Vakhitov R. Efficacy of federated learning on genomic data: a study on the UK Biobank and the 1000 Genomes Project. Front Big Data 2024; 7:1266031. [PMID: 38487517 PMCID: PMC10937521 DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1266031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Combining training data from multiple sources increases sample size and reduces confounding, leading to more accurate and less biased machine learning models. In healthcare, however, direct pooling of data is often not allowed by data custodians who are accountable for minimizing the exposure of sensitive information. Federated learning offers a promising solution to this problem by training a model in a decentralized manner thus reducing the risks of data leakage. Although there is increasing utilization of federated learning on clinical data, its efficacy on individual-level genomic data has not been studied. This study lays the groundwork for the adoption of federated learning for genomic data by investigating its applicability in two scenarios: phenotype prediction on the UK Biobank data and ancestry prediction on the 1000 Genomes Project data. We show that federated models trained on data split into independent nodes achieve performance close to centralized models, even in the presence of significant inter-node heterogeneity. Additionally, we investigate how federated model accuracy is affected by communication frequency and suggest approaches to reduce computational complexity or communication costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry Kolobkov
- GENXT, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Laboratory of Ecological Genetics, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow, Russia
| | - Satyarth Mishra Sharma
- GENXT, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Center for Artificial Intelligence Technology, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Aleksandr Medvedev
- GENXT, Hinxton, United Kingdom
- Center for Artificial Intelligence Technology, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou J, Chen S, Wu Y, Li H, Zhang B, Zhou L, Hu Y, Xiang Z, Li Z, Chen N, Han W, Xu C, Wang D, Gao X. PPML-Omics: A privacy-preserving federated machine learning method protects patients' privacy in omic data. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadh8601. [PMID: 38295178 PMCID: PMC10830108 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh8601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Modern machine learning models toward various tasks with omic data analysis give rise to threats of privacy leakage of patients involved in those datasets. Here, we proposed a secure and privacy-preserving machine learning method (PPML-Omics) by designing a decentralized differential private federated learning algorithm. We applied PPML-Omics to analyze data from three sequencing technologies and addressed the privacy concern in three major tasks of omic data under three representative deep learning models. We examined privacy breaches in depth through privacy attack experiments and demonstrated that PPML-Omics could protect patients' privacy. In each of these applications, PPML-Omics was able to outperform methods of comparison under the same level of privacy guarantee, demonstrating the versatility of the method in simultaneously balancing the privacy-preserving capability and utility in omic data analysis. Furthermore, we gave the theoretical proof of the privacy-preserving capability of PPML-Omics, suggesting the first mathematically guaranteed method with robust and generalizable empirical performance in protecting patients' privacy in omic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juexiao Zhou
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Siyuan Chen
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Yulian Wu
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Haoyang Li
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Bin Zhang
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Longxi Zhou
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Yan Hu
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Zihang Xiang
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Zhongxiao Li
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ningning Chen
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Wenkai Han
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Chencheng Xu
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Di Wang
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Xin Gao
- Computer Science Program, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- Computational Bioscience Research Center, Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Z, Guo Y, Xu R. Attitude Disparity and Worrying Scenarios in Genetic Discrimination-Based on Questionnaires from China. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11020188. [PMID: 36673556 PMCID: PMC9859512 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11020188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: As genetic testing is increasingly used in non-medical fields, the judgment of people's potential conditions based on predictive genetic information inevitably causes genetic discrimination (henceforth GD). This article aimed to systematically investigate the disparity in attitudes and worrying scenarios concerning GD in China. Methods: A questionnaire survey of 555 respondents was conducted. Statistical tests were used to examine disparity in attitudes between gender, age, and education. A descriptive analysis was also conducted to explore other worrying scenarios. Results: It shows that (1) men are more tolerant of GD compared to women, and (2) participants aged between 18 and 30 years old possess the highest objection to GD. However, (3) no indication can attest to the relationship between educational level and perspective on GD. In addition, (4) the acceptance of gene testing in the three most common scenarios is ranked in descending order as follows: partner choice, insurance services, and recruitment. Moreover, (5) worrying scenarios relating to GD include: education, social occasions, medical services, fertility, shopping, and so on. Conclusions: Based on the results, suggestions proposed include developing a blacklist mechanism in the field of genetic data application and strengthening the security regulations for the commercial use of genetic data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong Wang
- School of Economics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
- Key Laboratory of Digital Economy and Data Governance, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
| | - Yujun Guo
- LIESMARS, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
| | - Rui Xu
- School of Economics, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-20-3932-2722
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mighton C, Shickh S, Aguda V, Krishnapillai S, Adi-Wauran E, Bombard Y. From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening. Front Genet 2022; 13:893832. [PMID: 36353115 PMCID: PMC9637971 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.893832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic medicine is expanding from a focus on diagnosis at the patient level to prevention at the population level given the ongoing under-ascertainment of high-risk and actionable genetic conditions using current strategies, particularly hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch Syndrome (LS) and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The availability of large-scale next-generation sequencing strategies and preventive options for these conditions makes it increasingly feasible to screen pre-symptomatic individuals through public health-based approaches, rather than restricting testing to high-risk groups. This raises anew, and with urgency, questions about the limits of screening as well as the moral authority and capacity to screen for genetic conditions at a population level. We aimed to answer some of these critical questions by using the WHO Wilson and Jungner criteria to guide a synthesis of current evidence on population genomic screening for HBOC, LS, and FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Mighton
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Salma Shickh
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vernie Aguda
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Suvetha Krishnapillai
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ella Adi-Wauran
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cernat A, Bashir NS, Ungar WJ. Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework. J Community Genet 2022; 13:155-170. [PMID: 35171498 PMCID: PMC8941003 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00582-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing exists largely outside of any regulatory schemes, and studies providing a comprehensive overview of the ethical, social, legal, and technological considerations for regulating these types of technologies are lacking. This paper uses the 3-I framework for policy analysis to analyze the ideas, interests, and institutions relevant to policy development for DTC genetic testing in North America and internationally. A scoping review was conducted. Citation databases were searched for papers addressing the ethical, social, legal, and technological implications of DTC genetic testing; stakeholder perspectives on and experiences with DTC genetic testing; or the effect of such testing on the healthcare system. Ninety-nine publications, organizational reports, governmental documents, or pieces of legislation were included. The ideas included are autonomy, informed decision making, privacy, and clinical validity and utility. The interests discussed are those of the public and healthcare providers. The institutions included are regulatory organizations such as the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, laws governing the implementation or delivery of genetic testing in general, and legislation created to protect against genetic discrimination. This analysis clarifies the ethical, social, legal, and technological issues of DTC genetic testing regulation. This information can be used by policy makers to develop or strengthen regulations for DTC genetic testing such as requiring an assessment of the clinical validity of tests before they become publicly available, controlling how tests are marketed, and stipulating requirements for healthcare provider involvement and informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Cernat
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada
| | - Naazish S Bashir
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alsaffar MM, Hasan M, McStay GP, Sedky M. Digital DNA lifecycle security and privacy: an overview. Brief Bioinform 2022; 23:6518049. [PMID: 35106557 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA sequencing technologies have advanced significantly in the last few years leading to advancements in biomedical research which has improved personalised medicine and the discovery of new treatments for diseases. Sequencing technology advancement has also reduced the cost of DNA sequencing, which has led to the rise of direct-to-consumer (DTC) sequencing, e.g. 23andme.com, ancestry.co.uk, etc. In the meantime, concerns have emerged over privacy and security in collecting, handling, analysing and sharing DNA and genomic data. DNA data are unique and can be used to identify individuals. Moreover, those data provide information on people's current disease status and disposition, e.g. mental health or susceptibility for developing cancer. DNA privacy violation does not only affect the owner but also affects their close consanguinity due to its hereditary nature. This article introduces and defines the term 'digital DNA life cycle' and presents an overview of privacy and security threats and their mitigation techniques for predigital DNA and throughout the digital DNA life cycle. It covers DNA sequencing hardware, software and DNA sequence pipeline in addition to common privacy attacks and their countermeasures when DNA digital data are stored, queried or shared. Likewise, the article examines DTC genomic sequencing privacy and security.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhalb M Alsaffar
- Department of Computing, AI and Robotics, School of Digital, Technologies and Arts, Staffordshire University, College Road, ST4 2DE, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| | | | - Gavin P McStay
- Department of Biological Sciences, School of Health, Science and Wellbeing, Staffordshire University, College Road, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 2DE, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed Sedky
- Department of Computing, AI and Robotics, School of Digital, Technologies and Arts, Staffordshire University, College Road, ST4 2DE, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Šket R, Kotnik P, Bizjan BJ, Kocen V, Mlinarič M, Tesovnik T, Debeljak M, Battelino T, Kovač J. Heterozygous Genetic Variants in Autosomal Recessive Genes of the Leptin-Melanocortin Signalling Pathway Are Associated With the Development of Childhood Obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:832911. [PMID: 35574020 PMCID: PMC9105721 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.832911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Monogenic obesity is a severe, genetically determined disorder that affects up to 1/1000 newborns. Recent reports on potential new therapeutics and innovative clinical approaches have highlighted the need for early identification of individuals with rare genetic variants that can alter the functioning of the leptin-melanocortin signalling pathway, in order to speed up clinical intervention and reduce the risk of chronic complications. Therefore, next-generation DNA sequencing of central genes in the leptin-melanocortin pathway was performed in 1508 children and adolescents with and without obesity, aged 2-19 years. The recruited cohort comprised approximately 5% of the national paediatric population with obesity. The model-estimated effect size of rare variants in the leptin-melanocortin signalling pathway on longitudinal weight gain between carriers and non-carriers was derived. In total, 21 (1.4%) participants had known disease-causing heterozygous variants (DCVs) in the genes under investigation, and 62 (4.1%) participants were carriers of rare variants of unknown clinical significance (VUS). The estimated frequency of potential genetic variants associated with obesity (including rare VUS) ranged between 1/150 (VUS and DCV) and 1/850 (DCV) and differed significantly between participants with and without obesity. On average, the variants identified would result in approximately 7.6 kg (7.0-12.9 kg at the 95th percentile of body weight) (girls) and 8.4 kg (8.2-14.4 kg) (boys) of additional weight gain in carriers at age 18 years compared with subjects without obesity. In conclusion, children with a genetic predisposition to obesity can be promptly identified and may account for more than 6% of obesity cases. Early identification of genetic variants in the LEPR, PCSK1, POMC, MC3R and MC4R genes could reduce the societal burden and improve the clinical management of early severe childhood obesity and its implementation should be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Šket
- Clinical Institute of Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana (UMC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primož Kotnik
- Department of Pediatrics Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana (UMC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Barbara Jenko Bizjan
- Clinical Institute of Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana (UMC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Valentina Kocen
- Clinical Institute of Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana (UMC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Matej Mlinarič
- Department of Pediatrics Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana (UMC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tine Tesovnik
- Clinical Institute of Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana (UMC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Maruša Debeljak
- Clinical Institute of Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana (UMC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tadej Battelino
- Department of Pediatrics Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana (UMC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jernej Kovač
- Clinical Institute of Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana (UMC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- *Correspondence: Jernej Kovač,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Althobaiti K. Surveillance in Next-Generation Personalized Healthcare: Science and Ethics of Data Analytics in Healthcare. New Bioeth 2021; 27:295-319. [PMID: 34720071 DOI: 10.1080/20502877.2021.1993055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Advances in science and technology have allowed for incredible improvements in healthcare. Additionally, the digital revolution in healthcare provides new ways of collecting and storing large volumes of patient data, referred to as big healthcare data. As a result, healthcare providers are now able to use data to gain a deeper understanding of how to treat an individual in what is referred to as personalized healthcare. Regardless, there are several ethical challenges associated with big healthcare data that affect how personalized healthcare is delivered. To highlight these issues, this article will review the role of big data in personalized healthcare while also discussing the ethical challenges associated with it. The article will also discuss public health surveillance, its implications, and the challenges associated with collecting participants' information. The article will proceed by highlighting next generation technologies, including robotics and 3D printing. The article will conclude by providing recommendations on how patient privacy can be protected in next-generation personalized healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal Althobaiti
- Centre for Global Health Ethics, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Caudai C, Galizia A, Geraci F, Le Pera L, Morea V, Salerno E, Via A, Colombo T. AI applications in functional genomics. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2021; 19:5762-5790. [PMID: 34765093 PMCID: PMC8566780 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We review the current applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in functional genomics. The recent explosion of AI follows the remarkable achievements made possible by "deep learning", along with a burst of "big data" that can meet its hunger. Biology is about to overthrow astronomy as the paradigmatic representative of big data producer. This has been made possible by huge advancements in the field of high throughput technologies, applied to determine how the individual components of a biological system work together to accomplish different processes. The disciplines contributing to this bulk of data are collectively known as functional genomics. They consist in studies of: i) the information contained in the DNA (genomics); ii) the modifications that DNA can reversibly undergo (epigenomics); iii) the RNA transcripts originated by a genome (transcriptomics); iv) the ensemble of chemical modifications decorating different types of RNA transcripts (epitranscriptomics); v) the products of protein-coding transcripts (proteomics); and vi) the small molecules produced from cell metabolism (metabolomics) present in an organism or system at a given time, in physiological or pathological conditions. After reviewing main applications of AI in functional genomics, we discuss important accompanying issues, including ethical, legal and economic issues and the importance of explainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Caudai
- CNR, Institute of Information Science and Technologies “A. Faedo” (ISTI), Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonella Galizia
- CNR, Institute of Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies (IMATI), Genoa, Italy
| | - Filippo Geraci
- CNR, Institute for Informatics and Telematics (IIT), Pisa, Italy
| | - Loredana Le Pera
- CNR, Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies (IBIOM), Bari, Italy
- CNR, Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology (IBPM), Rome, Italy
| | - Veronica Morea
- CNR, Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology (IBPM), Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Salerno
- CNR, Institute of Information Science and Technologies “A. Faedo” (ISTI), Pisa, Italy
| | - Allegra Via
- CNR, Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology (IBPM), Rome, Italy
| | - Teresa Colombo
- CNR, Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology (IBPM), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tiller JM, Keogh LA, McInerney-Leo AM, Belcher A, Barlow-Stewart K, Boughtwood T, Gleeson P, Dowling G, Prince A, Bombard Y, Joly Y, Delatycki M, Winship IM, Otlowski M, Lacaze P. A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals' views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium. J Med Genet 2021; 59:817-826. [PMID: 34544841 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2021-107989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2019, the Australian life insurance industry introduced a partial moratorium (ban) limiting the use of genetic test results in life insurance underwriting. The moratorium is industry self-regulated and applies only to policies below certain financial limits (eg, $500 000 of death cover). METHODS We surveyed Australian health professionals (HPs) who discuss genetic testing with patients, to assess knowledge of the moratorium; reported patient experiences since its commencement; and HP views regarding regulation of genetic discrimination (GD) in Australia. RESULTS Between April and June 2020, 166 eligible HPs responded to the online survey. Of these, 86% were aware of the moratorium, but <50% had attended related training/information sessions. Only 16% answered all knowledge questions correctly, yet 69% believed they had sufficient knowledge to advise patients. Genetics HPs' awareness and knowledge were better than non-genetics HPs' (p<0.05). There was some reported decrease in patients delaying/declining testing after the moratorium's introduction, however, 42% of HPs disagreed that patients were more willing to have testing post-moratorium. Although many (76%) felt the moratorium resolved some GD concerns, most (88%) still have concerns, primarily around self-regulation, financial limits and the moratorium's temporary nature. Almost half (49%) of HPs reported being dissatisfied with the moratorium as a solution to GD. The majority (95%) felt government oversight is required, and 93% felt specific Australian legislation regarding GD is required. CONCLUSION While the current Australian moratorium is considered a step forward, most HPs believe it falls short of an adequate long-term regulatory solution to GD in life insurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane M Tiller
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia .,Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise A Keogh
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aideen M McInerney-Leo
- Human Genomics Group, University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrea Belcher
- The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Australian Genomics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Tiffany Boughtwood
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Australian Genomics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penny Gleeson
- School of Law, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Grace Dowling
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anya Prince
- The University of Iowa College of Law, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yann Joly
- Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Martin Delatycki
- Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services Ltd, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Clinical Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Paul Lacaze
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Genetic Discrimination Observatory: confronting novel issues in genetic discrimination. Trends Genet 2021; 37:951-954. [PMID: 34503867 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Genetic discrimination (GD) is the differential or unfair profiling of an individual on the basis of genetic data. This article summarizes the actions of the Genetic Discrimination Observatory (GDO) in addressing GD and recent developments in GD since late 2020. It shows how GD can take many forms in today's rapidly evolving society.
Collapse
|
13
|
Cheung NYC, Fung JLF, Ng YNC, Wong WHS, Chung CCY, Mak CCY, Chung BHY. Perception of personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, and genetic testing among undergraduates in Hong Kong. Hum Genomics 2021; 15:54. [PMID: 34407885 PMCID: PMC8371796 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-021-00353-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global development and advancement of genomic medicine in the recent decade has accelerated the implementation of personalized medicine (PM) and pharmacogenomics (PGx) into clinical practice, while catalyzing the emergence of genetic testing (GT) with relevant ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). RESULTS The perception of university undergraduates with regards to PM and PGx was investigated, and 80% of undergraduates valued PM as a promising healthcare model with 66% indicating awareness of personal genome testing companies. When asked about the curriculum design towards PM and PGx, compared to undergraduates in non-medically related curriculum, those studying in medically related curriculum had an adjusted 7.2 odds of perceiving that their curriculum was well-designed for learning PGx (95% CI 3.6-14.6) and a 3.7 odds of perceiving that PGx was important in their study (95% CI 2.0-6.8). Despite this, only 16% of medically related curriculum undergraduates would consider embarking on future education on PM. When asked about their perceptions on GT, 60% rated their genetic knowledge as "School Biology" level or below while 76% would consider undergoing a genetic test. As for ELSI, 75% of undergraduates perceived that they were aware of ethical issues of GT in general, particularly on "Patient Privacy" (80%) and "Data Confidentiality" (68%). Undergraduates were also asked about their perceived reaction upon receiving an unfavorable result from GT, and over half of the participants perceived that they would feel "helpless or pessimistic" (56%), "inadequate or different" (59%), and "disadvantaged at job seeking" (59%), while older undergraduates had an adjusted 2.0 odds of holding the latter opinion (95% CI 1.1-3.5), compared to younger undergraduates. CONCLUSION Hong Kong undergraduates showed a high awareness of PM but insufficient genetic knowledge and low interest in pursuing a career towards PM. They were generally aware of ethical issues of GT and especially concerned about patient privacy and data confidentiality. There was a predominance of pessimistic views towards unfavorable testing results. This study calls for the attention to evaluate education and talent development on genomics, and update existing legal frameworks on genetic testing in Hong Kong.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Yan Chai Cheung
- Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery Program, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Jasmine Lee Fong Fung
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Yvette Nga Chung Ng
- Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery Program, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Wilfred Hing Sang Wong
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China
| | - Claudia Ching Yan Chung
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
| | - Christopher Chun Yu Mak
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
| | - Brian Hon Yin Chung
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Hong Kong Children's Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Laying the Groundwork to Investigate Diversity of Life Sciences Reading Lists in Higher Education and Its Link to Awarding Gaps. EDUCATION SCIENCES 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/educsci11070359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This study presents a case for decolonising the life sciences curriculum to improve representation of the Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME) scholars—a step in eliminating the race “awarding gap”. Here, we investigated diversity among authors in terms of ethnicity and gender of reading lists at the School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex. We show that the reading lists are not diverse and do not represent the demography of the student body. For instance, a disproportionately high number of authors in the reading lists are white 83.40 ± 5.70% (n = 977 authors), male 75.90 ± 5.40% (n = 878 authors), and of European descent. Additionally, our analysis of the geographical locations of publications reveals that a significantly high number of our materials stem from the USA or the UK, whereas the second highest global output of scientific literature (after the USA) comes from China, which is only featured in 1.02% of the reading list. Moreover, we constructively provide potential solutions to decolonise the curriculum of the University of Sussex’s School of Life Sciences by diversifying their reading lists. This study should help to establish a foundation, along with other work that is being conducted, to address the BAME awarding gap and to better showcase the work of women and ethnically underrepresented scientists in history and in modern day.
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim H, Ho CWL, Ho CH, Athira PS, Kato K, De Castro L, Kang H, Huxtable R, Zwart H, Ives J, Lee I, Joly Y, Kim SY. Genetic discrimination: introducing the Asian perspective to the debate. NPJ Genom Med 2021; 6:54. [PMID: 34210984 PMCID: PMC8249378 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-021-00218-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Our article aims to provide a comprehensive portrayal of how seven Asian jurisdictions have sought to address the challenge of genetic discrimination (GD) by presenting an analysis of the relevant legislation, policies, and practices. Based on our findings, policy discussion and action on preventing or mitigating GD have been narrowly framed in terms of employment, insurance, disability, marriage, and family planning. Except for South Korea, none of the jurisdictions we examined has adopted specific legislation to prevent GD. However, for Asia to truly benefit from its recent scientific and technological progress in genomics, we highlight the need for these jurisdictions to engage more proactively with the challenges of GD through a coordinated regulatory and governance mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Kim
- Asian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | - P S Athira
- National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi, India
| | - Kazuto Kato
- Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | | | - Richard Huxtable
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Hub Zwart
- Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Ives
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ilhak Lee
- Asian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yann Joly
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - So Yoon Kim
- Asian Institute for Bioethics and Health Law, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dalpé G, Pinkesz M, Oliviero E, Tolymbek M, Joly Y. Genetic discrimination views in online discussion forums: Perspectives from Canadian forumites. J Genet Couns 2021; 30:1613-1628. [PMID: 33871129 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Recent advancements in genetic technologies have made genetic information increasingly sought out in a wide range of non-therapeutic contexts, which has increased the risk that such information be used to discriminate against individuals. Frequently, it is genetic counselors who have to respond to questions about genetic discrimination (GD) from worried patients. Here, we examine the general Canadian public's knowledge, attitudes, and concerns about GD through a comprehensive analysis and categorization of posts from selected Canadian online discussion forums. Overall, we collected 1,638 posts, from which we coded 694 posts originating from newspaper comment sections and Reddit posts that were categorized to yield 6 main themes that consistently concerned Canadian users on the topics of GD: (a) discussions centered around how insurance business practices can be affected by genetic information; (b) issues in employment; (c) 'fear' of genetic testing and eugenics; (d) preventive approaches such as law and human rights instruments; (e) the predictive value and privacy that should be conferred to genetic information; and (f) other ethical issues. Overall, discussions addressed risk stratification models applied to genetic information and personal insurance underwriting. We find that many forum users (aka forumites) fear GD in insurance and employment, consider genetic information private, and strongly support different legal approaches to prevent GD. However, we find dissension among forumites that may represent different advocacy groups such as insurers and employers. From these important concerns and social conceptions, we discuss issues that should be taken into consideration for the development of future policies and information campaigns addressing GD in Canada and other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gratien Dalpé
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Miriam Pinkesz
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Elisabeth Oliviero
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Maria Tolymbek
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Yann Joly
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chavarria-Soley G, Francis-Cartin F, Jimenez-Gonzalez F, Ávila-Aguirre A, Castro-Gomez MJ, Robarts L, Middleton A, Raventós H. Attitudes of Costa Rican individuals towards donation of personal genetic data for research. Per Med 2021; 18:141-152. [PMID: 33576268 PMCID: PMC8010325 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2020-0113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Aim: We explore attitudes from the public in Costa Rica regarding willingness to donate DNA data for research. Materials & methods: A total of 224 Costa Rican individuals answered the anonymous online survey 'Your DNA, Your Say'. It covers attitudes toward DNA and medical data donation, trust in research professionals and concerns about consequences of reidentification. Results & conclusion: Most individuals (89%) are willing to donate their information for research purposes. When confronted with different potential uses of their data, participants are significantly less likely to donate data to for-profit researchers (34% willingness to donate). The most frequently cited concerns regarding donation of genetic data relate to possible discrimination by health/life insurance companies and employers. For the participants in the survey, the most trusted professionals are their own medical doctor and nonprofit researchers from their country. This is the first study regarding attitudes toward genetic data donation in Costa Rica.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Chavarria-Soley
- Escuela de Biología/Universidad de Costa Rica/San José, Costa Rica.,Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular/Universidad de Costa Rica/San José, Costa Rica
| | - Fernanda Francis-Cartin
- Escuela de Biología/Universidad de Costa Rica/San José, Costa Rica.,Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular/Universidad de Costa Rica/San José, Costa Rica
| | - Fabiola Jimenez-Gonzalez
- Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular/Universidad de Costa Rica/San José, Costa Rica
| | - Alejandro Ávila-Aguirre
- Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular/Universidad de Costa Rica/San José, Costa Rica
| | - Maria Jose Castro-Gomez
- Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular/Universidad de Costa Rica/San José, Costa Rica
| | - Lauren Robarts
- Society & Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anna Middleton
- Society & Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.,Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge
| | - Henriette Raventós
- Escuela de Biología/Universidad de Costa Rica/San José, Costa Rica.,Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular/Universidad de Costa Rica/San José, Costa Rica
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bhatia NS, Lim JY, Bonnard C, Kuan JL, Brett M, Wei H, Cham B, Chin H, Bosso-Lefevre C, Dharuman P, Escande-Beillard N, Devasia AG, Goh CYJ, Kam S, Liew WKM, Liew WK, Lin G, Jain K, Ng AYJ, Subramanian D, Xie M, Tan YM, Tawari NR, Tiang Z, Ting TW, Tohari S, Tong CK, Lezhava A, Ng SB, Law HY, Venkatesh B, Tomar S, Sethi R, Tan G, Shanmugasundaram A, Goh DLM, Lai PS, Lai A, Tan ES, Ng I, Reversades B, Tan EC, Foo R, Jamuar SS. Singapore Undiagnosed Disease Program: Genomic Analysis aids Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Arch Dis Child 2021; 106:31-37. [PMID: 32819910 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Use next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to improve our diagnostic yield in patients with suspected genetic disorders in the Asian setting. DESIGN A diagnostic study conducted between 2014 and 2019 (and ongoing) under the Singapore Undiagnosed Disease Program. Date of last analysis was 1 July 2019. SETTING Inpatient and outpatient genetics service at two large academic centres in Singapore. PATIENTS Inclusion criteria: patients suspected of genetic disorders, based on abnormal antenatal ultrasound, multiple congenital anomalies and developmental delay. EXCLUSION CRITERIA patients with known genetic disorders, either after clinical assessment or investigations (such as karyotype or chromosomal microarray). INTERVENTIONS Use of NGS technology-whole exome sequencing (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES (1) Diagnostic yield by sequencing type, (2) diagnostic yield by phenotypical categories, (3) reduction in time to diagnosis and (4) change in clinical outcomes and management. RESULTS We demonstrate a 37.8% diagnostic yield for WES (n=172) and a 33.3% yield for WGS (n=24). The yield was higher when sequencing was conducted on trios (40.2%), as well as for certain phenotypes (neuromuscular, 54%, and skeletal dysplasia, 50%). In addition to aiding genetic counselling in 100% of the families, a positive result led to a change in treatment in 27% of patients. CONCLUSION Genomic sequencing is an effective method for diagnosing rare disease or previous 'undiagnosed' disease. The clinical utility of WES/WGS is seen in the shortened time to diagnosis and the discovery of novel variants. Additionally, reaching a diagnosis significantly impacts families and leads to alteration in management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha S Bhatia
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Tufts Medical Center and the Floating Hospital for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jiin Ying Lim
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Jyn-Ling Kuan
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore
| | - Maggie Brett
- KK Research Centre, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Heming Wei
- KK Research Centre, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Breana Cham
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Huilin Chin
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Celia Bosso-Lefevre
- Institute of Medical Biology, A*STAR, Singapore.,Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | - Sylvia Kam
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore
| | - Wendy Kein-Meng Liew
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,SBCC Baby and Child Clinic, Singapore
| | - Woei Kang Liew
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,SBCC Baby and Child Clinic, Singapore
| | - Grace Lin
- KK Research Centre, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Kanika Jain
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,POLARIS, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Min Xie
- POLARIS, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yuen-Ming Tan
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,DNA Diagnostic and Research Laboratory, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Zenia Tiang
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore
| | - Teck Wah Ting
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Centre, Singapore
| | - Sumanty Tohari
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore
| | | | | | - Sarah B Ng
- POLARIS, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hai Yang Law
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,DNA Diagnostic and Research Laboratory, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Byrappa Venkatesh
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore
| | - Swati Tomar
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Raman Sethi
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Grace Tan
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Arthi Shanmugasundaram
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Denise Li-Meng Goh
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Poh San Lai
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore.,Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore
| | - Angeline Lai
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Centre, Singapore
| | - Ee Shien Tan
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Centre, Singapore
| | - Ivy Ng
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Centre, Singapore
| | - Bruno Reversades
- Institute of Medical Biology, A*STAR, Singapore.,Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,POLARIS, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore.,Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Singapore
| | - Ene Choo Tan
- KK Research Centre, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Roger Foo
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,POLARIS, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore.,Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Genome Institute of Singapore, A*STAR, Singapore.,National University Heart Centre, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Saumya Shekhar Jamuar
- Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore .,SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore.,Paediatrics Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Centre, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pashayan N, Antoniou AC, Ivanus U, Esserman LJ, Easton DF, French D, Sroczynski G, Hall P, Cuzick J, Evans DG, Simard J, Garcia-Closas M, Schmutzler R, Wegwarth O, Pharoah P, Moorthie S, De Montgolfier S, Baron C, Herceg Z, Turnbull C, Balleyguier C, Rossi PG, Wesseling J, Ritchie D, Tischkowitz M, Broeders M, Reisel D, Metspalu A, Callender T, de Koning H, Devilee P, Delaloge S, Schmidt MK, Widschwendter M. Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020; 17:687-705. [PMID: 32555420 PMCID: PMC7567644 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The European Collaborative on Personalized Early Detection and Prevention of Breast Cancer (ENVISION) brings together several international research consortia working on different aspects of the personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer. In a consensus conference held in 2019, the members of this network identified research areas requiring development to enable evidence-based personalized interventions that might improve the benefits and reduce the harms of existing breast cancer screening and prevention programmes. The priority areas identified were: 1) breast cancer subtype-specific risk assessment tools applicable to women of all ancestries; 2) intermediate surrogate markers of response to preventive measures; 3) novel non-surgical preventive measures to reduce the incidence of breast cancer of poor prognosis; and 4) hybrid effectiveness-implementation research combined with modelling studies to evaluate the long-term population outcomes of risk-based early detection strategies. The implementation of such programmes would require health-care systems to be open to learning and adapting, the engagement of a diverse range of stakeholders and tailoring to societal norms and values, while also addressing the ethical and legal issues. In this Consensus Statement, we discuss the current state of breast cancer risk prediction, risk-stratified prevention and early detection strategies, and their implementation. Throughout, we highlight priorities for advancing each of these areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Urska Ivanus
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - David French
- Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Division of Health Technology Assessment, Oncotyrol - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center of Family Breast and Ovarian Cancer, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Odette Wegwarth
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Center for Adaptive Rationality, Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Zdenko Herceg
- Epigenetic Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), WHO, Lyon, France
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - David Ritchie
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mireille Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Dan Reisel
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andres Metspalu
- The Estonian Genome Center, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Thomas Callender
- Department of Applied Health Research, Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK
| | - Harry de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Breast Cancer Department, Gustave Roussy Institute, Paris, France
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martin Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
- Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
- European Translational Oncology Prevention and Screening (EUTOPS) Institute, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yuen J, Fung SM, Sia CL, Venkatramani M, Shaw T, Courtney E, Li ST, Chiang J, Tan VKM, Tan BKT, Ngeow J. An in-depth exploration of the post-test informational needs of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers in Asia. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2020; 18:22. [PMID: 33110458 PMCID: PMC7585213 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-020-00154-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Identification of one's status as a BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carrier often marks the start of navigating challenging decisions related to cancer risk management and result disclosure. Carriers report unmet informational needs, but studies have yet to explore the specific aspects of and how best to fulfill these needs. This study aims to explore the informational needs of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in Asia to inform for the design of educational materials to support risk management decision-making. Methods Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with two male and 22 female English-speaking BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, aged 29-66 years, identified through the Cancer Genetics Service at the National Cancer Centre Singapore. A grounded theory approach with thematic analysis was undertaken to extract dominant themes. Results Four themes were identified: (i) proactive online information seeking behaviors (ii) personalized informational needs; (iii) challenges in sharing the results; and (iv) lack of genetic awareness. Discussion Participants highlight challenges with sharing their result arising from significant post-result informational needs, which have manifested into proactive online information-seeking behaviors. They desire for an online source of information, where content is personalized, reliable and local. Participants foresee the potential of an online resource to raise genetic awareness. This suggests the use of a culturally tailored online-based genetics resource, to promote result disclosure, empower risk-management decisions and raise genetic literacy rates. Supplementary information Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13053-020-00154-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Yuen
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Si Ming Fung
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chin Leong Sia
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Drive, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mallika Venkatramani
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tarryn Shaw
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eliza Courtney
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shao-Tzu Li
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jianbang Chiang
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan
- Singhealth-Duke NUS Breast Centre, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benita Kiat-Tee Tan
- Singhealth-Duke NUS Breast Centre, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, 11 Mandalay Drive, Singapore, Singapore.,Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Long-awaited progress in addressing genetic discrimination in the United States. Genet Med 2020; 23:429-431. [PMID: 33077893 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01002-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
22
|
Jones K, Daniels H, Heys S, Lacey A, Ford DV. Toward a Risk-Utility Data Governance Framework for Research Using Genomic and Phenotypic Data in Safe Havens: Multifaceted Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e16346. [PMID: 32412420 PMCID: PMC7260661 DOI: 10.2196/16346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research using genomic data opens up new insights into health and disease. Being able to use the data in association with health and administrative record data held in safe havens can multiply the benefits. However, there is much discussion about the use of genomic data with perceptions of particular challenges in doing so safely and effectively. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to work toward a risk-utility data governance framework for research using genomic and phenotypic data in an anonymized form for research in safe havens. METHODS We carried out a multifaceted review drawing upon data governance arrangements in published research, case studies of organizations working with genomic and phenotypic data, public views and expectations, and example studies using genomic and phenotypic data in combination. The findings were contextualized against a backdrop of legislative and regulatory requirements and used to create recommendations. RESULTS We proposed recommendations toward a risk-utility model with a flexible suite of controls to safeguard privacy and retain data utility for research. These were presented as overarching principles aligned to the core elements in the data sharing framework produced by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health and as practical control measures distilled from published literature and case studies of operational safe havens to be applied as required at a project-specific level. CONCLUSIONS The recommendations presented can be used to contribute toward a proportionate data governance framework to promote the safe, socially acceptable use of genomic and phenotypic data in safe havens. They do not purport to eradicate risk but propose case-by-case assessment with transparency and accountability. If the risks are adequately understood and mitigated, there should be no reason that linked genomic and phenotypic data should not be used in an anonymized form for research in safe havens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerina Jones
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Daniels
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Sharon Heys
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Arron Lacey
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - David V Ford
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ward ET, Kostick KM, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Integrating Genomics into Psychiatric Practice: Ethical and Legal Challenges for Clinicians. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2020; 27:53-64. [PMID: 30614887 PMCID: PMC6326091 DOI: 10.1097/hrp.0000000000000203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Psychiatric genomics is a rapidly growing field that holds much promise for improving risk prediction, prevention, diagnosis, treatment selection, and understanding of the pathogenesis of patients' symptoms. The field of psychiatry (i.e., professional organizations, mental health clinicians, educational institutions), however, needs to address numerous challenges to promote the responsible translation of genomic technologies and knowledge into psychiatric practice. The goal of this article is to review how clinicians currently encounter and use genomics in the clinic, to summarize the existing literature on how clinicians feel about the use of genomics in psychiatry, and to analyze foreseeable ethical and legal challenges for the responsible integration of genomics into psychiatric care at the structural and clinic levels. Structural challenges are defined as aspects of the larger system of psychiatric practice that constitute potential barriers to the responsible integration of genomics for the purposes of psychiatric care and prevention. These structural challenges exist at a level where professional groups can intervene to set standards and regulate the practice of psychiatry and genomics. Clinic-level challenges are day-to-day issues clinicians face when managing genomic tests in the clinic. We discuss the need for action to mitigate these challenges and maximize the clinical and social utility of psychiatric genomics, including the following: expanding genomics training among mental health clinicians; establishing practice guidelines that consider potential clinical, psychological, and social implications of psychiatric genomics; promoting an integrated care model for managing genomics in psychiatry; emphasizing patient engagement and informed consent when managing genomic testing in psychiatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric T Ward
- From the University of North Carolina School of Medicine (Dr. Ward); Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine (Drs. Kostick and Lázaro-Muñoz)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Erro R. Genetic discrimination and fa(h)r beyond. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2020; 75:119-120. [PMID: 32205043 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Erro
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Via Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Goda H, Kawasaki H, Masuoka Y, Kohama N, Rahman MM. Opportunities and challenges of integrating genetics education about human diversity into public health nurses' responsibilities in Japan. BMC Nurs 2019; 18:65. [PMID: 31827391 PMCID: PMC6902480 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-019-0391-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many genetic tests are now available due to evolution by the Human Genome Project. However, the growing use of genetic testing and screening may not only lead to improvements in public health and health promotion, but also trigger grave ethical, legal, and societal concerns. The involvement of community healthcare providers is expected in the future because they have direct contact with the residents through their health programs. The aims of the current study were to clarify how public health nurses perceive the relationship between genetics and professional duties and to identify opportunities and challenges of integrating genetics education into their professional duties. METHODS In 2017, data were collected through a focus group interview. Content related to the 'presence or absence of health consultation related to genetic issues as part of actual job duties' and 'training for handling genetic-related health consultations' was extracted. Entire sentences were coded and categorized based on similar semantic content. RESULTS Public health nurses had difficulties in recognizing genetic issues in public health activities. In some cases, genetic contents were included in conversation and consultation with the general public. Through the professional education and experiences, public health nurses needed specialized education, post-graduation studies and mentoring about genetics. CONCLUSIONS Public health nurses whose professional duties do not directly relate to genetics were exposed to genetics-related episodes on a regular basis without their awareness. The provision of accurate information and knowledge related to genetics by public health nurses would also provide an opportunity for clients to be informed about their latent genetic risks. Hence, there is a need for practical resources, the establishment of collaboration networks, and the development of professional organizations for public health nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromi Goda
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553 Japan
| | - Hiromi Kawasaki
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553 Japan
| | - Yuko Masuoka
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553 Japan
| | - Natsu Kohama
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553 Japan
| | - Md Moshiur Rahman
- Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8553 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wong YKE, Lam KW, Ho KY, Yu CSA, Cho CSW, Tsang HF, Chu MKM, Ng PWL, Tai CSW, Chan LWC, Wong EYL, Wong SCC. The applications of big data in molecular diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2019; 19:905-917. [PMID: 31422710 DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1657834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Kwan Evelyn Wong
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Ka Wai Lam
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Ka Yi Ho
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | | | - Chi Shing William Cho
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Hin Fung Tsang
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Man Kee Maggie Chu
- Department of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Po Wah Lawrence Ng
- Department of Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Chi Shing William Tai
- Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Lawrence Wing Chi Chan
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Elaine Yue Ling Wong
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Sze Chuen Cesar Wong
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bélisle-Pipon JC, Vayena E, Green RC, Cohen IG. Genetic testing, insurance discrimination and medical research: what the United States can learn from peer countries. Nat Med 2019; 25:1198-1204. [PMID: 31388181 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0534-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
While genetic testing may be the gateway to the future of medicine, it also poses challenges for individuals, especially in terms of differentiated treatments on the basis of their genetic characteristics. The fear of unwanted disclosure to insurers and the possibility of genetic discrimination can hamper the recruitment of individuals for clinical research that involves genetic testing. Precision medicine initiatives, such as All of Us, are proliferating in the United States. In order to succeed, however, they must ensure that the millions of Americans recruited to share their genetic data are not penalized with regard to life, disability and long-term insurance coverage. In this Perspective, we discuss several initiatives adopted by countries around the world, such as the United Kingdom and France, that better balance the interests of insurers and research subjects, and explain how the United States might learn from them. We call for regulatory and industry leadership to come together to establish a voluntary moratorium on insurance pricing with the aim of protecting research participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Effy Vayena
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert C Green
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Broad Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - I Glenn Cohen
- Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
With rapid advances in genetics and genomics, the commercialization and access to new applications has become more widespread and omnipresent throughout biomedical research. Thus, increasingly, more patients will have personal genomic information they may share with primary care providers (PCPs) to better understand the clinical significance of the data. To be able to respond to patient inquiries about genomic data, variant interpretation, disease risk, and other issues, PCPs will need to be able to increase or refresh their awareness about genetics and genomics, and identify reliable resources to use or refer patients. While provider educational efforts have increased, with the rapid advances in the field, ongoing efforts will be needed to prepare PCPs to manage patient needs, integrate results into care, and refer as indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne B Haga
- Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Brannan C, Foulkes AL, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Preventing discrimination based on psychiatric risk biomarkers. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2019; 180:159-171. [PMID: 29633550 PMCID: PMC6173986 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2017] [Revised: 02/17/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Recent studies have identified genomic and nongenomic psychiatric risk biomarkers (PRBs; e.g., genomic variants, blood analytes, gray matter volume). PRBs may soon become a powerful tool for improving psychiatric care and prevention. PRB research and its translation to clinical care, however, may prove to be a double-edged sword. Mental health stigma and discrimination are already widespread, and data caution that biological explanations of psychiatric disorders can exacerbate these stigmatizing attitudes, increasing the desire for social distance and heightening the perceived dangerousness of the patient. As a reaction to the Human Genome Project and historical concerns about eugenics, the international community mobilized to establish legislation to prevent genomic discrimination. But in most countries, these laws are limited to few contexts (e.g., employment, health insurance), and very few countries protect against discrimination based on nongenomic risk biomarkers. Like genomic PRBs, nongenomic PRBs provide information regarding risk for stigmatized psychiatric disorders and have similar-and in some cases greater-predictive value. Numerous large-scale neuroscience and neurogenomics projects are advancing the identification and translation of PRBs. The prospect of PRB-based stigma however, threatens to undermine the potential benefits of this research. Unbridaled by nonexistent or limited PRB anti-discrimination protections, the threat of PRB-based stigma and discrimination may lead many to forego PRB testing, even if shown to have clinical utility. To maximize the clinical and social benefits of PRB-based technologies, educational campaigns should address mental health and PRB stigma, and lawmakers should carefully consider expanding legislation that prohibits PRB-based discrimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody Brannan
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Biosciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexandra L. Foulkes
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- University of Houston Law Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Boyce AM, Garibaldi BT. Genomics and High-Consequence Infectious Diseases: A Scoping Review of Emerging Science and Potential Ethical Issues. Health Secur 2019; 17:62-68. [PMID: 30724614 DOI: 10.1089/hs.2018.0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Host genomic research on high-consequence infectious diseases is a growing area, but the ethical, legal, and social implications of such findings related to potential applications of the research have not yet been identified. While there is a robust ethical debate about the ethical, legal, and social implications of research during an emergency, there has been less consideration of issues facing research conducted outside of the scope of emergency response. Addressing the implications of research at an early stage (anticipatory ethics) helps define the issue space, facilitates preparedness, and promotes ethically and socially responsible practices. To lay the groundwork for more comprehensive anticipatory ethics work, this article provides a preliminary assessment of the state of the field with a scoping review of host genomic research on a subset of high-consequence infectious diseases of relevance to high-level isolation units, focusing on its ethically relevant features and identifying several ethical, legal, and social implications raised by the literature. We discuss the challenges of genomic studies of low-frequency, high-risk events and applications of the science, including identifying targets to guide the development of new therapeutics, improving vaccine development, finding biomarkers to predict disease outcome, and guiding decisions about repurposing existing drugs and genetic screening. Some ethical, legal, and social implications identified in the literature included the rise of systems biology and paradigm shifts in medical countermeasure development; controversies over repurposing of existing drugs; genetic privacy and discrimination; and benefit-sharing and global inequity as part of the broader ecosystem surrounding high-level isolation units. Future anticipatory ethics work should forecast the science and its applications; identify a more comprehensive list of ethical, legal, and social implications; and facilitate evaluation by multiple stakeholders to inform the integration of ethical concerns into high-level isolation unit policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angie M Boyce
- Angie M. Boyce, PhD, is Research Scholar and Associate Faculty, Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brian T Garibaldi
- Brian T. Garibaldi, MD, MEHP, is Director, Johns Hopkins Biocontainment Unit, and Associate Professor, Medicine and Physiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wright CF, Ware JS, Lucassen AM, Hall A, Middleton A, Rahman N, Ellard S, Firth HV. Genomic variant sharing: a position statement. Wellcome Open Res 2019; 4:22. [PMID: 31886409 PMCID: PMC6913213 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15090.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Sharing de-identified genetic variant data is essential for the practice of genomic medicine and is demonstrably beneficial to patients. Robust genetic diagnoses that inform medical management cannot be made accurately without reference to genetic test results from other patients, as well as population controls. Errors in this process can result in delayed, missed or erroneous diagnoses, leading to inappropriate or missed medical interventions for the patient and their family. The benefits of sharing individual genetic variants, and the harms of not sharing them, are numerous and well-established. Databases and mechanisms already exist to facilitate deposition and sharing of pseudonomised genetic variants, but clarity and transparency around best practice is needed to encourage widespread use, prevent inconsistencies between different communities, maximise individual privacy and ensure public trust. We therefore recommend that widespread sharing of a small number of individual genetic variants associated with limited clinical information should become standard practice in genomic medicine. Information robustly linking genetic variants with specific conditions is fundamental biological knowledge, not personal information, and therefore should not require consent to share. For additional case-level detail about individual patients or more extensive genomic information, which is often essential for clinical interpretation, it may be more appropriate to use a controlled-access model for data sharing, with the ultimate aim of making as much information as open and de-identified as possible with appropriate consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline F. Wright
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - James S. Ware
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial Centre for Translational and Experimental Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anneke M. Lucassen
- Department of Clinical Ethics and Law, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Anna Middleton
- Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Connecting Science, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nazneen Rahman
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, UK, London, UK
| | - Sian Ellard
- Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen V. Firth
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Cambridge Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wright CF, Ware JS, Lucassen AM, Hall A, Middleton A, Rahman N, Ellard S, Firth HV. Genomic variant sharing: a position statement. Wellcome Open Res 2019. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15090.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Sharing de-identified genetic variant data is essential for the practice of genomic medicine and is demonstrably beneficial to patients. Robust genetic diagnoses that inform medical management cannot be made accurately without reference to genetic test results from other patients, as well as population controls. Errors in this process can result in delayed, missed or erroneous diagnoses, leading to inappropriate or missed medical interventions for the patient and their family. The benefits of sharing individual genetic variants, and the harms of not sharing them, are numerous and well-established. Databases and mechanisms already exist to facilitate deposition and sharing of pseudonomised genetic variants, but clarity and transparency around best practice is needed to encourage widespread use, prevent inconsistencies between different communities, maximise individual privacy and ensure public trust. We therefore recommend that widespread sharing of a small number of individual genetic variants associated with limited clinical information should become standard practice in genomic medicine. Information robustly linking genetic variants with specific conditions is fundamental biological knowledge, not personal information, and therefore should not require consent to share. For additional case-level detail about individual patients or more extensive genomic information, which is often essential for clinical interpretation, it may be more appropriate to use a controlled-access model for data sharing, with the ultimate aim of making as much information as open and de-identified as possible with appropriate consent.
Collapse
|
33
|
Tiller J, Keogh L, Wake S, Delatycki M, Otlowski M, Lacaze P. Genetics, Insurance and Professional Practice: Survey of the Australasian Clinical Genetics Workforce. Front Public Health 2018; 6:333. [PMID: 30542646 PMCID: PMC6277853 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In Australia and New Zealand, by contrast with much of the developed world, insurance companies can use genetic test results to refuse cover or increase premiums for mutually-rated insurance products, including life, income protection and disability insurance. Genetics professionals regularly discuss insurance implications with clients and report the issue as a clinical challenge, yet no studies have examined clinical practices or opinions. This study surveyed genetic counsellors and clinical geneticists from Australia and New Zealand to (i) investigate variability in professional practice across the Australasian clinical genetic workforce relating to the insurance implications of genetic testing, and (ii) ascertain views regarding current regulation of the issue. There was considerable variability in training and clinical policies, especially around the communication of insurance implications. Almost half of participants reported receiving no training on the insurance implications of genetic testing, and almost 40% were unsure whether they could adequately advise clients. A number of deficits in professional knowledge and understanding of the issue were identified. Widespread concerns regarding regulation of this area were reported, with < 10% of Australian participants considering current Australian regulations as adequate to protect clients from genetic discrimination. The findings from this study highlight scope for greater education, consistency and professional training on the issue of genetics and insurance in Australasia, and strong agreement about the need for regulatory reform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Tiller
- Public Health Genomics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Louise Keogh
- Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Samantha Wake
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Martin Delatycki
- Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Bruce Lefroy Centre, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret Otlowski
- Faculty of Law, Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Paul Lacaze
- Public Health Genomics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Comparative perspectives: regulating insurer use of genetic information. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 27:340-348. [PMID: 30401960 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0293-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Fear of genetic discrimination has led individuals worldwide to avoid medically recommended genetic testing and participation in genomics research, causing potential health effects as research and clinical care are stymied. In response, many countries have adopted policies that regulate how insurers, such as life, disability, or critical illness insurers, can underwrite using genetic test results. This article presents a comparison of policies in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, through analysis of interviews with 59 key stakeholders representing insurance, government, advocacy, academia, and genetics. While the ultimate policy of each country is different, the policy motivations and issues raised share commonalities across the countries, particularly around themes of fairness, usefulness of genetic information, and the determination of actuarial fairness.
Collapse
|
35
|
Clayton EW, Halverson CM, Sathe NA, Malin BA. A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204417. [PMID: 30379944 PMCID: PMC6209148 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Concerns about genetic privacy affect individuals' willingness to accept genetic testing in clinical care and to participate in genomics research. To learn what is already known about these views, we conducted a systematic review, which ultimately analyzed 53 studies involving the perspectives of 47,974 participants on real or hypothetical privacy issues related to human genetic data. Bibliographic databases included MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, and Sociological Abstracts. Three investigators independently screened studies against predetermined criteria and assessed risk of bias. The picture of genetic privacy that emerges from this systematic literature review is complex and riddled with gaps. When asked specifically "are you worried about genetic privacy," the general public, patients, and professionals frequently said yes. In many cases, however, that question was posed poorly or only in the most general terms. While many participants expressed concern that genomic and medical information would be revealed to others, respondents frequently seemed to conflate privacy, confidentiality, control, and security. People varied widely in how much control they wanted over the use of data. They were more concerned about use by employers, insurers, and the government than they were about researchers and commercial entities. In addition, people are often willing to give up some privacy to obtain other goods. Importantly, little attention was paid to understanding the factors-sociocultural, relational, and media-that influence people's opinions and decisions. Future investigations should explore in greater depth which concerns about genetic privacy are most salient to people and the social forces and contexts that influence those perceptions. It is also critical to identify the social practices that will make the collection and use of these data more trustworthy for participants as well as to identify the circumstances that lead people to set aside worries and decide to participate in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen W. Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
- Center for Genetic Privacy & Identity in Community Settings, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Colin M. Halverson
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Nila A. Sathe
- Vanderbilt Evidence-Based Practice Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, and Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Bradley A. Malin
- Center for Genetic Privacy & Identity in Community Settings, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
- Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jayasinghe K, Quinlan C, Stark Z, Patel C, Mallawaarachchi A, Wardrop L, Kerr PG, Trnka P, Mallett AJ. Renal genetics in Australia: Kidney medicine in the genomic age. Nephrology (Carlton) 2018; 24:279-286. [PMID: 30239064 PMCID: PMC6587832 DOI: 10.1111/nep.13494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
There have been few new therapies for patients with chronic kidney disease in the last decade. However, the management of patients affected by genetic kidney disease is rapidly evolving. Inherited or genetic kidney disease affects around 10% of adults with end‐stage kidney disease and up to 70% of children with early onset kidney disease. Advances in next‐generation sequencing have enabled rapid and cost‐effective sequencing of large amounts of DNA. Next‐generation sequencing‐based diagnostic tests now enable identification of a monogenic cause in around 20% of patients with early‐onset chronic kidney disease. A definitive diagnosis through genomic testing may negate the need for prolonged diagnostic investigations and surveillance, facilitate reproductive planning and provide accurate counselling for at‐risk relatives. Genomics has allowed the better understanding of disease pathogenesis, providing prognostic information and facilitating development of targeted treatments for patients with inherited or genetic kidney disease. Although genomic testing is becoming more readily available, there are many challenges to implementation in clinical practice. Multidisciplinary renal genetics clinics serve as a model of how some of these challenges may be overcome. Such clinics are already well established in most parts of Australia, with more to follow in future. With the rapid pace of new technology and gene discovery, collaboration between expert clinicians, laboratory and research scientists is of increasing importance to maximize benefits to patients and health‐care systems. The authors reckoned the importance of genomic testing as it allows better understanding of disease pathogenesis, provides prognostic information and facilitates development of targeted treatment, particularly for patients with inherited or genetic kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kushani Jayasinghe
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,KidGen Renal Genetics Flagship, Australian Genomic Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine Quinlan
- KidGen Renal Genetics Flagship, Australian Genomic Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zornitza Stark
- KidGen Renal Genetics Flagship, Australian Genomic Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chirag Patel
- KidGen Renal Genetics Flagship, Australian Genomic Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amali Mallawaarachchi
- Department of Medical Genomics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Wardrop
- KidGen Renal Genetics Flagship, Australian Genomic Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter G Kerr
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Trnka
- KidGen Renal Genetics Flagship, Australian Genomic Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Queensland Child and Adolescent Renal Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Institute for Molecular Bioscience and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Kidney Health Service and Conjoint Renal Research Laboratory, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew J Mallett
- KidGen Renal Genetics Flagship, Australian Genomic Health Alliance, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Institute for Molecular Bioscience and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Kidney Health Service and Conjoint Renal Research Laboratory, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lévesque E, Kirby E, Bolt I, Knoppers BM, de Beaufort I, Pashayan N, Widschwendter M. Ethical, Legal, and Regulatory Issues for the Implementation of Omics-Based Risk Prediction of Women's Cancer: Points to Consider. Public Health Genomics 2018; 21:37-44. [PMID: 30223261 DOI: 10.1159/000492663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Advances in omics open new opportunities for cancer risk prediction and risk-based screening interventions. However, implementation of risk prediction in clinical practice may impact the ethical, legal, and regulatory aspects of current cancer screening programs. In order to support decision-making, we analyzed the ethical, legal, and regulatory issues and developed a set of Points to Consider to support management of these issues. METHODS We analyzed the legal and policy frameworks applicable to breast and cervical cancer screening programs in 7 European countries. We identified the most relevant issues to be considered, and we developed considerations for their management, based on the literature, the legal and policy frameworks, and our experience with similar issues. RESULTS The considerations focus on five topics: (A) health services planning, (B) information and invitation, (C) consent and data/sample collection, (D) risk calculation and communication of results, and (E) storage of data and residual samples. CONCLUSION Current frameworks might not be adequate to implement a risk prediction approach using omics factors due to the different characteristics of such approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuelle Lévesque
- Center of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec,
| | - Emily Kirby
- Public Population Project in Genomics and Society (P³G), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ineke Bolt
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bartha Maria Knoppers
- Center of Genomics and Policy, Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Robinson SC. No exchange, same pain, no gain: Risk-reward of wearable healthcare disclosure of health personally identifiable information for enhanced pain treatment. Health Informatics J 2018; 25:1675-1691. [PMID: 30204037 DOI: 10.1177/1460458218796634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Wearable technologies have created fascinating opportunities for patients to treat chronic pain in a discreet, mobile fashion. However, many of these health wearables require patients to disclose sensitive information, including health information (e.g., heart rate, glucose levels) and personal information (location, email, name, etc.). Individuals using wearables for treatment of chronic pain may sacrifice social health elements, including their privacy, in exchange for better physical and mental health. Utilizing communication privacy management, a popular disclosure theory, this article explores the policy and ethical ramifications of patients disclosing sensitive health information in exchange for better health treatment and relief of chronic pain. The article identifies scenarios where a user must disclose information, and what factors motivate or dissuade disclosure, and ultimately the use of a health wearable. Practical implications of this conceptual article include an improved understanding of how and why consumers may disclose personal data to health wearables, and potential impacts for public policy and ethics regarding how wearables and their manufacturers entice disclosure of private health information.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kalatharan V, Lemaire M, Lanktree MB. Opportunities and Challenges for Genetic Studies of End-Stage Renal Disease in Canada. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2018; 5:2054358118789368. [PMID: 30046452 PMCID: PMC6056781 DOI: 10.1177/2054358118789368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose of review: Genetic testing can improve diagnostic precision in some patients with
end-stage renal disease (ESRD) providing the potential for targeted therapy
and improved patient outcomes. We sought to describe the genetic
architecture of ESRD and Canadian data sources available for further genetic
investigation into ESRD. Sources of information: We performed PubMed searches of English, peer-reviewed articles using
keywords “chronic kidney disease,” “ESRD,” “genetics,” “sequencing,” and
“administrative databases,” and searched for nephrology-related Mendelian
diseases on the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database. Methods: In this narrative review, we discuss our evolving understanding of the
genetic architecture of kidney disease and ESRD, the risks and benefits of
using genetic data to help diagnose and manage patients with ESRD, existing
public Canadian biobanks and databases, and a vision for future genetic
studies of ESRD in Canada. Key findings: ESRD has a polygenic architecture including rare Mendelian mutations and
common small effect genetic polymorphism contributors. Genetic testing will
improve diagnostic accuracy and contribute to a precision medicine approach
in nephrology. However, the risk and benefits of genetic testing needs to be
considered from an individual and societal perspective, and further research
is required. Merging existing health data, linking biobanks and
administrative databases, and forming Canadian collaborations hold great
potential for genetic research into ESRD. Large sample sizes are necessary
to perform the suitably powered investigations required to bring this vision
to reality. Limitations: This is a narrative review of the literature discussing future directions and
opportunities. It reflects the views and academic biases of the authors. Implications: National collaborations will be required to obtain sample sizes required for
impactful, robust research. Merging established datasets may be one approach
to obtain adequate samples. Patient education and engagement will improve
the value of knowledge gained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinusha Kalatharan
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Mathieu Lemaire
- Division of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Cell Biology Program, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew B Lanktree
- Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chen Y, Song L. China: concurring regulation of cross-border genomic data sharing for statist control and individual protection. Hum Genet 2018; 137:605-615. [PMID: 30014187 PMCID: PMC6132628 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-018-1903-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
This paper reviews the major legal instruments and self-regulations that bear heavily on the cross-border sharing of genomic data in China. It first maps out three overlapping frameworks on genomic data and analyzes their underpinning policy goals. Subsequent sections examine the regulatory approaches with respect to five aspects of responsible use and sharing of genomic data, namely, consent, privacy, security, compatible processing, and oversight. It argues that substantial centralised control exerted by the state is, and would probably remain, the dominant feature of genomic data governance in China, though concerns of individual protection are gaining momentum. Rather than revolving around a simplistic antinomy between privacy preservation and open science, the regulatory landscape is mainly shaped by the tension between government desires for national security, state competitiveness, and public health benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongxi Chen
- Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| | - Lingqiao Song
- Center of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Thorogood A. Canada: will privacy rules continue to favour open science? Hum Genet 2018; 137:595-602. [PMID: 30014188 PMCID: PMC6132649 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-018-1905-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 07/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Canada’s regulatory frameworks governing privacy and research are generally permissive of genomic data sharing, though they may soon be tightened in response to public concerns over commercial data handling practices and the strengthening of influential European privacy laws. Regulation can seem complex and uncertain, in part because of the constitutional division of power between federal and provincial governments over both privacy and health care. Broad consent is commonly practiced in genomic research, but without explicit regulatory recognition, it is often scrutinized by research or privacy oversight bodies. Secondary use of health-care data is legally permissible under limited circumstances. A new federal law prohibits genetic discrimination, but is subject to a constitutional challenge. Privacy laws require security safeguards proportionate to the data sensitivity, including breach notification. Special categories of data are not defined a priori. With some exceptions, Canadian researchers are permitted to share personal information internationally but are held accountable for safeguarding the privacy and security of these data. Cloud computing to store and share large scale data sets is permitted, if shared responsibilities for access, responsible use, and security are carefully articulated. For the moment, Canada’s commercial sector is recognized as “adequate” by Europe, facilitating import of European data. Maintaining adequacy status under the new European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a concern because of Canada’s weaker individual rights, privacy protections, and regulatory enforcement. Researchers must stay attuned to shifting international and national regulations to ensure a sustainable future for responsible genomic data sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian Thorogood
- BCL/LLB, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Thorogood A, Mäki‐Petäjä‐Leinonen A, Brodaty H, Dalpé G, Gastmans C, Gauthier S, Gove D, Harding R, Knoppers BM, Rossor M, Bobrow M. Consent recommendations for research and international data sharing involving persons with dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14:1334-1343. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Revised: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Mäki‐Petäjä‐Leinonen
- Faculty of Social Sciences and Business StudiesLaw SchoolUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Gratien Dalpé
- Centre of Genomics and PolicyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - Chris Gastmans
- Interfaculty Centre for Biomedical Ethics and LawKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Serge Gauthier
- McGill Centre for Studies in AgingMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | | | - Rosie Harding
- Birmingham Law SchoolUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Martin Rossor
- UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Martin Bobrow
- Department of Medical GeneticsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Harmanci A, Gerstein M. Analysis of sensitive information leakage in functional genomics signal profiles through genomic deletions. Nat Commun 2018; 9:2453. [PMID: 29934598 PMCID: PMC6015012 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04875-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional genomics experiments, such as RNA-seq, provide non-individual specific information about gene expression under different conditions such as disease and normal. There is great desire to share these data. However, privacy concerns often preclude sharing of the raw reads. To enable safe sharing, aggregated summaries such as read-depth signal profiles and levels of gene expression are used. Projects such as GTEx and ENCODE share these because they ostensibly do not leak much identifying information. Here, we attempt to quantify the validity of this statement, measuring the leakage of genomic deletions from signal profiles. We present information theoretic measures for the degree to which one can genotype these deletions. We then develop practical genotyping approaches and demonstrate how to use these to identify an individual within a large cohort in the context of linking attacks. Finally, we present an anonymization method removing much of the leakage from signal profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arif Harmanci
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
- School of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Precision Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Mark Gerstein
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
- Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Barlow-Stewart K, Liepins M, Doble A, Otlowski M. How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers? Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:1248-1256. [PMID: 29891881 PMCID: PMC6117272 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0198-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2017] [Revised: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
In Australia, the USA and many Asian countries the life insurance industry is self-regulated. Individuals must disclose genetic test results known to them in applications for new or updated policies including cover for critical care, income protection and death. There is limited information regarding how underwriting decisions are made for policies with such disclosures. The Australian Financial Services Council (FSC) provided de-identified data collected on applications with genetic test result disclosure from its life insurance member companies 2010–2013 to enable repetition of an independent examination undertaken of applications 1999-2003: age; gender; genetic condition; testing result; decision-maker; and insurance cover. Data was classified as to test result alone or additional other factors relevant to risk and decision. Where necessary, the FSC facilitated clarification by insurers. 345/548 applications related to adult-onset conditions. The genetic test result solely influenced the decision in 165/345 applications: positive (n = 23), negative (n = 139) and pending (n = 3). Detailed analyses of the decisions in each of these result categories are presented with specific details of 11 test cases. Policies with standard decisions were provided for all negative test results with evidence of reassessment of previous non-standard decisions and 20/23 positive results with recognition of risk reduction strategies. Disclosure of positive results for breast/ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome and hereditary spastic paraplegia, and three pending results, generated non-standard decisions. The examination demonstrates some progress in addressing concerns in regard to utilisation of genetic test information but the self-regulatory system in Australia only goes some way in meeting internationally recommended best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Barlow-Stewart
- Sydney Medical School - Northern, University of Sydney Level 7 Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
| | - M Liepins
- Sydney Medical School - Northern, University of Sydney Level 7 Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - A Doble
- Consultant Actuary, 406/116 Belmont Rd, Mosman, NSW, 2088, Australia
| | - M Otlowski
- Faculty of Law, College of Arts, Law and Education University of Tasmania, Private Bag 89, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Dupras C, Song L, Saulnier KM, Joly Y. Epigenetic Discrimination: Emerging Applications of Epigenetics Pointing to the Limitations of Policies Against Genetic Discrimination. Front Genet 2018; 9:202. [PMID: 29937773 PMCID: PMC6002493 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Over more than two decades, various policies have been adopted worldwide to restrict the use of individual genetic information for non-medical reasons by third parties and prevent ‘genetic discrimination’. In this paper, we bring attention to the growing interest for individual epigenetic information by insurers and forensic scientists. We question whether such interest could lead to ‘epigenetic discrimination’ – the differential adverse treatment or abusive profiling of individuals or groups based on their actual or presumed epigenetic characteristics – and argue that we might already be facing the limitations of recently adopted normative approaches against genetic discrimination. First, we highlight some similarities and differences between genetic and epigenetic modifications, and stress potential challenges to regulating epigenetic discrimination. Second, we argue that most existing normative approaches against genetic discrimination fall short in providing oversight into the field of epigenetics. We conclude with a call for discussion on the issue, and the development of comprehensive and forward-looking preventive strategies against epigenetic discrimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Dupras
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lingqiao Song
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Katie M Saulnier
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Yann Joly
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Minari J, Brothers KB, Morrison M. Tensions in ethics and policy created by National Precision Medicine Programs. Hum Genomics 2018; 12:22. [PMID: 29665847 PMCID: PMC5904987 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0151-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine promises to use genomics and other data-intensive approaches to improve diagnosis and develop new treatments for major diseases, but also raises a range of ethical and governance challenges. Implementation of precision medicine in “real world” healthcare systems blurs the boundary between research and care. This has implications for the meaning and validity of consent, and increased potential for discrimination, among other challenges. Increased sharing of personal information raises concerns about privacy, commercialization, and public trust. This paper considers national precision medicine schemes from the USA, the UK, and Japan, comparing how these challenges manifest in each national context and examining the range of approaches deployed to mitigate the potential undesirable social consequences. There is rarely a “one size” fits all solution to these complex problems, but the most viable approaches are those which take account of cultural preferences and attitudes, available resources, and the wider political landscape in which national healthcare systems are embedded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jusaku Minari
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kyle B Brothers
- Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
| | - Michael Morrison
- Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Ewert House, Ewert Place, Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7DD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Manzini A, Vears DF. Predictive Psychiatric Genetic Testing in Minors: An Exploration of the Non-Medical Benefits. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2018; 15:111-120. [PMID: 29230699 PMCID: PMC5897476 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9828-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to psychiatric conditions is likely to become part of standard practice. Because the onset of most psychiatric diseases is in late adolescence or early adulthood, testing minors could lead to early identification that may prevent or delay the development of these disorders. However, due to their complex aetiology, psychiatric genetic testing does not provide the immediate medical benefits that current guidelines require for testing minors. While several authors have argued non-medical benefits may play a crucial role in favour of predictive testing for other conditions, little research has explored such a role in psychiatric disorders. This paper outlines the potential non-medical benefits and harms of psychiatric genetic testing in minors in order to consider whether the non-medical benefits could ever make such testing appropriate. Five non-medical themes arise in the literature: psychological impacts, autonomy/self-determination, implications of the biomedical approach, use of financial and intellectual resources, and discrimination. Non-medical benefits were prominent in all of them, suggesting that psychiatric genetic testing in minors may be appropriate in some circumstances. Further research needs to empirically assess these potential non-medical benefits, incorporate minors in the debate, and include normative reflection to evaluate the very purposes and motivations of psychiatric genetic testing in minors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Manzini
- Neuroscience, Ethics & Society Team, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Warneford Ln, Oxford, OX3 7JX UK
| | - Danya F. Vears
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Box 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Technologies such as next-generation sequencing and chromosomal microarray have advanced the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of a variety of renal disorders. Genetic findings are increasingly used to inform the clinical management of many nephropathies, enabling targeted disease surveillance, choice of therapy, and family counselling. Genetic analysis has excellent diagnostic utility in paediatric nephrology, as illustrated by sequencing studies of patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Although additional investigation is needed, pilot studies suggest that genetic testing can also provide similar diagnostic insight among adult patients. Reaching a genetic diagnosis first involves choosing the appropriate testing modality, as guided by the clinical presentation of the patient and the number of potential genes associated with the suspected nephropathy. Genome-wide sequencing increases diagnostic sensitivity relative to targeted panels, but holds the challenges of identifying causal variants in the vast amount of data generated and interpreting secondary findings. In order to realize the promise of genomic medicine for kidney disease, many technical, logistical, and ethical questions that accompany the implementation of genetic testing in nephrology must be addressed. The creation of evidence-based guidelines for the utilization and implementation of genetic testing in nephrology will help to translate genetic knowledge into improved clinical outcomes for patients with kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E Groopman
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1150 Saint Nicholas Avenue, Russ Berrie Pavilion #412C, New York, New York 10032, USA
| | - Hila Milo Rasouly
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1150 Saint Nicholas Avenue, Russ Berrie Pavilion #412C, New York, New York 10032, USA
| | - Ali G Gharavi
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1150 Saint Nicholas Avenue, Russ Berrie Pavilion #412C, New York, New York 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Dalpé G, Ngueng Feze I, Salman S, Joly Y, Hagan J, Lévesque E, Dorval V, Blouin-Bougie J, Amara N, Dorval M, Simard J. Breast Cancer Risk Estimation and Personal Insurance: A Qualitative Study Presenting Perspectives from Canadian Patients and Decision Makers. Front Genet 2017; 8:128. [PMID: 28983318 PMCID: PMC5613157 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic stratification approaches in personalized medicine may considerably improve our ability to predict breast cancer risk for women at higher risk of developing breast cancer. Notwithstanding these advantages, concerns have been raised about the use of the genetic information derived in these processes, outside of the research and medical health care settings, by third parties such as insurers. Indeed, insurance applicants are asked to consent to insurers accessing their medical information (implicitly including genetic) to verify or determine their insurability level, or eligibility to certain insurance products. This use of genetic information may result in the differential treatment of individuals based on their genetic information, which could lead to higher premium, exclusionary clauses or even the denial of coverage. This phenomenon has been commonly referred to as "Genetic Discrimination" (GD). In the Canadian context, where federal Bill S-201, An Act to prohibit and prevent genetic discrimination, has recently been enacted but may be subject to constitutional challenges, information about potential risks to insurability may raise issues in the clinical context. We conducted a survey with women in Quebec who have never been diagnosed with breast cancer to document their perspectives. We complemented the research with data from 14 semi-structured interviews with decision-makers in Quebec to discuss institutional issues raised by the use of genetic information by insurers. Our results provide findings on five main issues: (1) the reluctance to undergo genetic screening test due to insurability concerns, (2) insurers' interest in genetic information, (3) the duty to disclose genetic information to insurers, (4) the disclosure of potential impacts on insurability before genetic testing, and (5) the status of genetic information compared to other health data. Overall, both groups of participants (the women surveyed and the decision-makers interviewed) acknowledged having concerns about GD and reported a need for better communication tools discussing insurability risk. Our conclusions regarding concerns about GD and the need for better communication tools in the clinical setting may be transferable to the broader Canadian context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gratien Dalpé
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill UniversityMontreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ida Ngueng Feze
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill UniversityMontreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahad Salman
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill UniversityMontreal, QC, Canada
| | - Yann Joly
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill UniversityMontreal, QC, Canada
| | - Julie Hagan
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill UniversityMontreal, QC, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Lévesque
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill UniversityMontreal, QC, Canada
| | - Véronique Dorval
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Quebec, Laval UniversityQuebec, QC, Canada
| | | | - Nabil Amara
- Faculty of Science of Administration, Laval UniversityQuebec, QC, Canada
| | - Michel Dorval
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Quebec, Laval UniversityQuebec, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval UniversityQuebec, QC, Canada
| | - Jacques Simard
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Quebec, Laval UniversityQuebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
|