1
|
Sánchez-Rubio P, Rodríguez-Romero R, Pinto-Monedero M, Alejo-Luque L, Martínez-Ortega J. New findings on clinical experience on surface-guided radiotherapy for frameless non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14510. [PMID: 39287562 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of a surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for setup and intra-fraction motion control in frameless non-coplanar stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) using actual patient data immobilized with two different types of open-faced masks and employing a novel SGRT systems settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty-four SRS patients were immobilized with two types of open-faced masks. Sixty lesions were treated, involving the analysis of 68 cone-beam scans (CBCT), 157 megavoltage (MV) images, and 521 SGRT monitoring sessions. The average SGRT translations/rotations and 3D vectors (MAG-Trasl and MAG-Rot) were compared with CBCT or antero-posterior MV images for 0° table or non-coplanar beams, respectively. The intrafraction control was evaluated based on the average shifts obtained from each monitoring session. To assess the association between the SGRT system and the CBCT, the two types of masks and the 3D vectors, a generalized estimating equations (GEE) regression analysis was performed. The Wilcoxon singed-rank test for paired samples was performed to detect differences in couch rotation with longitudinal (LNG) and lateral (LAT) translations and/or yaw. RESULTS The average SGRT corrections were smaller than those detected by CBCT (≤0.5 mm and 0.1°), with largest differences in LNG and yaw. The GEE analysis indicated that the average MAG-Trasl, obtained by the SGRT system, was not statistically different (p = 0.09) for both mask types, while, the MAG-Rot was different (p = 0.01). For non-coplanar beams, the Wilcoxon singed-rank test demonstrated no significantly differences for the corrections (LNG, LAT, and yaw) for any table rotation except for LNG corrections at 65° (p = 0.04) and 75° (p = 0.03) table angle position; LAT shifts at 65° (p = 0.03) and 270° (p < 0.001) table angle position, and yaw rotation at 30° (p = 0.02) table angle position. The average intrafraction motion was < 0.1 mm and 0.1° for any table angle. CONCLUSION The SGRT system used, along with the novel workflow performed, can achieve the setup and intra-fraction motion control accuracy required to perform non-coplanar fSRS treatments. Both masks ensure the accuracy required for fSRS while providing a suitable surface for monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Sánchez-Rubio
- Medical Physics Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ruth Rodríguez-Romero
- Medical Physics Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Pinto-Monedero
- Medical Physics Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Alejo-Luque
- Medical Physics Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jaime Martínez-Ortega
- Medical Physics Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Claridge Mackonis E, Stensmyr R, Poldy R, White P, Moutrie Z, Gorjiara T, Seymour E, Erven T, Hardcastle N, Haworth A. Improving motion management in radiation therapy: findings from a workshop and survey in Australia and New Zealand. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024; 47:813-820. [PMID: 38805104 PMCID: PMC11408578 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01405-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Motion management has become an integral part of radiation therapy. Multiple approaches to motion management have been reported in the literature. To allow the sharing of experiences on current practice and emerging technology, the University of Sydney and the New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory branch of the Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM) held a two-day motion management workshop. To inform the workshop program, participants were invited to complete a survey prior to the workshop on current use of motion management techniques and their opinion on the effectiveness of each approach. A post-workshop survey was also conducted, designed to capture changes in opinion as a result of workshop participation. The online workshop was the most well attended ever hosted by the ACPSEM, with over 300 participants and a response to the pre-workshop survey was received from at least 60% of the radiation therapy centres in Australia and New Zealand. Motion management is extensively used in the region with use of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) reported by 98% of centres for left-sided breast treatments and 91% for at least some right-sided breast treatments. Surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) was the most popular session at the workshop and survey results showed that the use of SGRT is likely to increase. The workshop provided an excellent opportunity for the exchange of knowledge and experience, with most survey respondents indicating that their participation would lead to improvements in the quality of delivery of treatments at their centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rachel Poldy
- Canberra Region Cancer Centre, Canberra, Australia
| | - Paul White
- South Eastern Sydney LHD, Randwick, Australia
| | - Zoë Moutrie
- South Western Sydney Cancer Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of NSW, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Tania Erven
- South Western Sydney Cancer Services, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centres, Melbourne, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kadhim M, Haraldsson A, Kügele M, Enocson H, Bäck S, Ceberg S. Surface guided ring gantry radiotherapy in deep inspiration breath hold for breast cancer patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14463. [PMID: 39138877 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated the use of surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) in combination with a tomotherapy treatment mode using discrete delivery angles for deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) treatments of breast cancer (bc). We aimed to assess the feasibility and dosimetric advantages of this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated camera occlusion in the Radixact treatment system bore and the stability of DIBH signals during couch movement. The SGRT system's ability to maintain signal and surface image accuracy was analyzed at different depths within the bore. Dosimetric parameters were compared and measured for 20 left-sided bc patients receiving TomoDirect (TD) tangential radiotherapy in both DIBH and free breathing (FB). RESULTS The SGRT system maintained surface coverage and precise DIBH-signal at depths up to 40 cm beyond the treatment center. Camera occlusion occurred in the clavicular and neck regions due to the patient's morphology and gantry geometry. Nonetheless, the system accurately detected respiratory motion for all measurements. The DIBH plans significantly (p < 0.001) reduced mean heart and left anterior descending artery (LAD) radiation doses by up to 40%, with a 50% reduction in near-maximum heart and LAD doses, respectively. No significant dosimetric differences between DIBH and FB were observed in other investigated parameters and volumes. CONCLUSIONS Camera occlusion and couch movement minimally impacted the real-time surface image accuracy needed for DIBH treatments of bc. DIBH reduced heart and LAD radiation doses significantly compared to FB, indicating the feasibility and dosimetric benefits of combining these modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Kadhim
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - André Haraldsson
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Malin Kügele
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hedda Enocson
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sven Bäck
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sofie Ceberg
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Trnková P, Dasu A, Placidi L, Stock M, Toma-Dasu I, Brouwer CL, Gosling A, Jouglar E, Kristensen I, Martin V, Moinuddin S, Pasquie I, Peters S, Pica A, Plaude S, Righetto R, Rombi B, Thariat J, van der Weide H, Hoffmann A, Bolsi A. Patterns of practice of image guided particle therapy for cranio-spinal irradiation: A site specific multi-institutional survey of European Particle Therapy Network. Phys Med 2024; 123:103407. [PMID: 38906046 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the current practice patterns in image-guided particle therapy (IGPT) for cranio-spinal irradiation (CSI). METHODS A multi-institutional survey was distributed to European particle therapy centres to analyse all aspects of IGPT. Based on the survey results, a Delphi consensus analysis was developed to define minimum requirements and optimal workflow for clinical practice. The centres participating in the institutional survey were invited to join the Delphi process. RESULTS Eleven centres participated in the survey. Imaging for treatment planning was rather similar among the centres with Computed Tomography (CT) being the main modality. For positioning verification, 2D IGPT was more commonly used than 3D IGPT. Two centres performed routinely imaging for plan adaptation, by the rest ad hoc. Eight centres participated in the Delphi consensus analysis. The full consensus was reached on the use of CT imaging without contrast for treatment planning and the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in target and organs-at-risk delineation. There was an agreement on the necessity to perform patient position verification and correction before each isocentre. The most important outcome was the clear need for standardization and harmonization of the workflow. CONCLUSION There were differences in CSI IGPT clinical practice among the European particle therapy centres. Moreover, the optimal workflow as identified by experts was not yet reached. There is a strong need for consensus guidelines. The state-of-the-art imaging technology and protocols need to be implemented into clinical practice to improve the quality of IGPT for CSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Trnková
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Rome, Italy
| | - Markus Stock
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Wiener Neustadt, Austria; Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Iuliana Toma-Dasu
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Charlotte L Brouwer
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew Gosling
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emmanuel Jouglar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, Paris, France
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- Radiation Physics, Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Valentine Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Syed Moinuddin
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Isabelle Pasquie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Peters
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Germany; West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
| | - Alessia Pica
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Sandija Plaude
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
| | - Roberto Righetto
- Medical Physics Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Barbara Rombi
- Proton Therapy Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Hiske van der Weide
- University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands
| | - Aswin Hoffmann
- OncoRay - National Centre for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laaksomaa M, Aula A, Sarudis S, Keyriläinen J, Ahlroth J, Murtola A, Pynnönen K, Lehtonen T, Björkqvist M, Järvinen L, Rossi M. Surface-guided radiotherapy systems in locoregional deep inspiration breath hold radiotherapy for breast cancer - a multicenter study on the setup accuracy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024; 29:176-186. [PMID: 39143974 PMCID: PMC11321775 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.99673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique are recommended for locoregional RT of breast cancer. The optimal workflow for a combination of surface-guided RT (SGRT) with DIBH technique is of current clinical interest. Materials and methods The setup accuracy at three hospitals was evaluated using different SGRT workflows. A total of 150 patients (2269 image pairs) were analyzed in three groups: patient setup with the AlignRT® SGRT system in Tampere (Site 1, n = 50), the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Turku (Site 2, n = 50) and the Catalyst™ SGRT system in Jönköping (Site 3, n = 50). Each site used their routine workflow with SGRT-based setup and IGRT positioning. Residual errors of the bony chest wall, thoracic vertebra (Th 1) and humeral head were evaluated using IGRT images. Results Systematic residual errors in the cranio-caudal (CC) direction and in pitch were generally larger at Site 2 than those at Sites 1 and 3 (p = 0.01-0.7). With daily IGRT, only a small difference (p = 0.01-0.9) was observed in residual random errors of bony structures in other directions between sites. Conclusion The introduction of SGRT and the use of daily IGRT lead to small residual errors when combining the best workflow practices from different hospitals. Our multicenter evaluation led to improved workflow by tightening the SGRT tolerances on Site 2 and fixation modification. Because of mainly small random errors, systematic posture errors in the images need to be corrected after posture correction with new setup surfaces. We recommend tight SGRT tolerances, good fixation and correction of systematic errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Laaksomaa
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Aula
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Medical Physics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Sebastian Sarudis
- Department of Medical Physics, County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Jani Keyriläinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Jenni Ahlroth
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Anna Murtola
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Kiira Pynnönen
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Turkka Lehtonen
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Mikko Björkqvist
- Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Lauri Järvinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Maija Rossi
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Medical Physics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brown E, Barry T, Mai T, Harvey J. Clinical experience of a tattoo application device. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 30:100254. [PMID: 38784599 PMCID: PMC11112350 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The use of tattoos for radiation therapy (RT) treatment is common practice. The Comfort Marker 2.0 (CQ Medical, Iowa, USA) has been designed to apply tattoos with a controlled depth injection, potentially resulting in tattoos that fade over time. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical implementation of the Comfort Marker 2.0 tattoo device including the patient experience and clinical workflow. Methods Patients undergoing RT treatment for breast cancer were invited to participate in this prospective pilot study. Patients completed a questionnaire after the planning session rating the level of pain experienced during tattoo application. Staff rated ease of use after each patient recording any feedback regarding the device. To evaluate tattoo fading, patients were followed up at 6 and 12 months after treatment to assess if tattoos could be visualised. Results Between August and December 2021, 50 breast cancer patients were recruited to the study. All patients received at least 3 tattoos. The majority of patients (80%) rated their pain between not hurting or hurting a little. More than 85% of staff indicated the device was easy or very easy to use. The three most common areas staff identified for improvement were: cordless device (39.1%), pen size (20.3%) and consumable rubbish (13.0%). All tattoos remained visible at the final follow up appointment. Conclusion Clinical implementation of the Comfort Marker tattoo device has been successful. Overall, patients found the process reasonably painless and staff found the device easy to use, providing a consistent result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Brown
- Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital – Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Tamara Barry
- Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital – Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Tao Mai
- Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital – Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jennifer Harvey
- Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Hospital – Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yamauchi R, Ito R, Itazawa T, Tomita F, Kawamori J. Psychological stress associated with skin marking during radiotherapy on breast cancer patients. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2024; 55:289-296. [PMID: 38677900 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.03.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to further understand the psychological distress associated with skin marking during radiotherapy among patients with breast cancer. The potential benefits of skin mark-free radiotherapy were also explored. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study population included female breast cancer patients scheduled for radiation therapy and skin marking. A 12-item survey was administered, encompassing demographics (age, treatment site and mode, and duration of hospital visits), awareness of skin marking, stress induced by skin marking in various life contexts, and perceived advantages of a skin mark-free alternative. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS The survey was completed by 107 patients, of whom 90 (84%) underwent whole breast irradiation, 15 (14%) received breast/chest wall and supraclavicular lymph node irradiation, and 2 (2%) were unspecified. The common sources of stress were from the presence of skin markings (33%), bathing (41%), clothing selection (25%), and skincare (30%), whereas 17 patients (16%) were not stressed by any of those factors. Meanwhile, 73% of patients reported taking precautions to prevent the skin marks from fading. Most patients (63%, n = 76) expressed preference for a skin mark-free radiotherapy option, with many willing to spend extra finances and time for this. CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion of female breast cancer patients experience stress from skin markings in various aspects of their daily lives. A preference for skin mark-free radiotherapy was noted among many patients, that next-generation technologies, such as surface-guided radiotherapy, could alleviate patient stress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The need for permanent or temporary skin markings in the era of state-of-the-art imaging technology should be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryohei Yamauchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
| | - Ryoko Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| | - Tomoko Itazawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| | - Fumihiro Tomita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| | - Jiro Kawamori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cumming J, Thompson K, Woodford K, Panettieri V, Sapkaroski D. The impact of a prophylactic skin dressing on surface-guided patient positioning in chest wall Radiation Therapy. J Med Radiat Sci 2024; 71:177-185. [PMID: 38525921 PMCID: PMC11177042 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) has emerged as a powerful tool to improve patient setup accuracy in radiation therapy (RT). Combined with the goal of increasing RT accuracy is an ongoing effort to decrease RT side effects. The application of a prophylactic skin dressing to the treatment site is a well-documented method of reducing skin-related side effects from RT. This paper aims to investigate whether the application of Mepitel, a prophylactic skin dressing, has an impact on the accuracy of surface-guided patient setups in chest wall RT. METHODS A retrospective analysis of daily image-guided Online Corrections (OLCs) from patients undergoing chest wall irradiation with SGRT was performed. Translational (superior-inferior, lateral, and anterior-posterior) OLC magnitude and direction were compared between patients treated with Mepitel applied and those treated without. Systematic and random errors were calculated and compared between groups. RESULTS OLCs from 275 fractions were analysed. Mean OLCs were larger for patients with Mepitel applied in the superior_inferior axis (0.34 vs. 0.22 cm, P = 0.049) and for the combined translational vector (0.54 vs. 0.43 cm, P = 0.043). Combined translational systematic error was slightly larger for patients with Mepitel applied (0.15 vs. 0.09 cm). CONCLUSION Mepitel can impact the accuracy of SGRT patient-positioning in chest wall RT. The variation however is small and unlikely to have any clinical impact if SGRT is coupled with image guidance and appropriate PTV margins. Further investigation is required to assess the effect of Mepitel on SGRT accuracy in other treatment sites, as well as any potential dosimetric impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Cumming
- Department of Radiation Therapy ServicesPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Kenton Thompson
- Department of Radiation Therapy ServicesPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Katrina Woodford
- Department of Radiation Therapy ServicesPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Vanessa Panettieri
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Physical SciencesPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Central Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Daniel Sapkaroski
- Department of Radiation Therapy ServicesPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Health and Biomedical SciencesRoyal Melbourne Institute of TechnologyBundooraVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Seravalli E, Kroon PS, Bolle S, Dunlea C, Harrabi SB, Laprie A, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Whitfield G, Janssens GO. Surface guided radiotherapy practice in paediatric oncology: a survey on behalf of the SIOPE Radiation Oncology Working Group. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1044-1049. [PMID: 38445717 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is increasingly being implemented to track patient's surface movement and position during radiation therapy. However, limited information is available on the SGRT use in paediatrics. The aim of this double survey was to map SIOPE (European Society for Paediatric Oncology)-affiliated centres using SGRT and to gain information on potential indications, observed, or expected benefits. METHODS A double online survey was distributed to 246 SIOPE-affiliated radiotherapy (RT) centres. Multiple choices, yes/no, and open answers were included. The first survey (41 questions) was active from February to March 2021. A shortened version (13 questions) was repeated in March 2023 to detect trends in SGRT use within the same community. RESULTS Respectively, 76/142 (54%) and 28/142 (20%) responding centres used and planned to use SGRT clinically, including 4/34 (12%) new centres since 2021. Among the SGRT users, 33/76 (43%) already applied this technology to paediatric treatments. The main benefits of improved patient comfort, better monitoring of intrafraction motion, and more accurate initial patient set-up expected by future users did not differ from current SGRT-users (P = .893). Among non-SGRT users, the main hurdles to implement SGRT were costs and time for installation. In paediatrics, SGRT is applied to all anatomical sites. CONCLUSION This work provides information on the practice of SGRT in paediatrics across SIOPE-affiliated RT centres which can serve as a basis for departments when considering the purchase of SGRT systems. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Since little information is available in the literature on the use of SGRT in paediatrics, the results of this double survey can serve as a basis for departments treating children when considering the purchase of an SGRT system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Petra S Kroon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Bolle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Campus, Villejuif 94 800, France
| | - Cathy Dunlea
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PB, United Kingdom
| | - Semi B Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Anne Laprie
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse 31100, France
| | - Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark
| | - Gillian Whitfield
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands
- Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht 3582CS, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Capaldi DPI, Axente M, Yu AS, Prionas ND, Hirata E, Nano TF. A Couch Mounted Smartphone-based Motion Monitoring System for Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:161-170. [PMID: 38052299 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surface-guided radiation-therapy (SGRT) systems are being adopted into clinical practice for patient setup and motion monitoring. However, commercial systems remain cost prohibitive to resource-limited clinics around the world. Our aim is to develop and validate a smartphone-based application using LiDAR cameras (such as on recent Apple iOS devices) for facilitating SGRT in low-resource centers. The proposed SGRT application was tested at multiple institutions and validated using phantoms and volunteers against various commercial systems to demonstrate feasibility. METHODS AND MATERIALS An iOS application was developed in Xcode and written in Swift using the Augmented-Reality (AR) Kit and implemented on an Apple iPhone 13 Pro with a built-in LiDAR camera. The application contains multiple features: 1) visualization of both the camera and depth video feeds (at a ∼60Hz sample-frequency), 2) region-of-interest (ROI) selection over the patient's anatomy where motion is measured, 3) chart displaying the average motion over time in the ROI, and 4) saving/exporting the motion traces and surface map over the ROI for further analysis. The iOS application was tested to evaluate depth measurement accuracy for: 1) different angled surfaces, 2) different field-of-views over different distances, and 3) similarity to a commercially available SGRT systems (Vision RT AlignRT and Varian IDENTIFY) with motion phantoms and healthy volunteers across 3 institutions. Measurements were analyzed using linear-regressions and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS Compared with the clinical system measurements (reference), the iOS application showed excellent agreement for depth (r = 1.000, P < .0001; bias = -0.07±0.24 cm) and angle (r = 1.000, P < .0001; bias = 0.02±0.69°) measurements. For free-breathing traces, the iOS application was significantly correlated to phantom motion (institute 1: r = 0.99, P < .0001; bias =-0.003±0.03 cm; institute 2: r = 0.98, P < .0001; bias = -0.001±0.10 cm; institute 3: r = 0.97, P < .0001; bias = 0.04±0.06 cm) and healthy volunteer motion (institute 1: r = 0.98, P < .0001; bias = -0.008±0.06 cm; institute 2: r = 0.99, P < .0001; bias = -0.007±0.12 cm; institute 3: r = 0.99, P < .0001; bias = -0.001±0.04 cm). CONCLUSIONS The proposed approach using a smartphone-based application provides a low-cost platform that could improve access to surface-guided radiation therapy accounting for motion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dante P I Capaldi
- San Francisco (UCSF) Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Marian Axente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Amy S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Nicolas D Prionas
- San Francisco (UCSF) Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Emily Hirata
- San Francisco (UCSF) Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Tomi F Nano
- San Francisco (UCSF) Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bolin MC, Falk M, Hedman M, Gagliardi G, Onjukka E. Surface-guided radiotherapy improves rotational accuracy in gynecological cancer patients. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024; 28:764-771. [PMID: 38515814 PMCID: PMC10954265 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.98733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to determine if rotational uncertainties in gynecological cancer patients can be reduced using surface imaging (SI) compared to aligning three markers on the patient's skin with in-room lasers (marker-laser). Materials and methods Fifty gynecological cancer patients treated with external-beam radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed; 25 patients were positioned with marker-laser and 25 patients were positioned with SI. The values of rotational (pitch and roll) deviations of the patient positions between the treatment-planning computed tomography (CT) and online cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were collected for both subcohorts and all treatment fractions after performing automatic registration between the two image sets. Statistical analysis of the difference between the two set-up methods was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results The median pitch deviation were 1.5° [interquartile range (IQR): 0.6°-2.6°] and 1.1° (IQR: 0.5°-1.9°) for the marker-laser and SI methods, respectively (p < 0.01). The median roll deviation was 0.5° (IQR: 0.2°-0.9°), and 0.7° (IQR: 0.3°-1.2°) for the marker-laser and SI methods, respectively (p < 0.01). Given the shape of the target, pitch deviations had a greater impact on the uncertainty at the periphery of the target and were considered more relevant. Conclusion By introducing SI as a set-up method in gynecological cancer patients, higher positioning accuracy could be achieved compared with the marker-laser set-up method. This was demonstrated based on residual deviations rather than deviations corrected for by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimmi-Caroline Bolin
- Section of Radiotherapy and Engineering, Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marianne Falk
- Section of Radiotherapy and Engineering, Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mattias Hedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Giovanna Gagliardi
- Section of Radiotherapy and Engineering, Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Onjukka
- Section of Radiotherapy and Engineering, Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Papalazarou C, Qamhiyeh S, Kaatee R, De Rouck J, Decabooter E, Hilgers GC, Salvo K, van Wingerden J, Bosmans H, van der Heyden B, Pittomvils G, Bogaert E. Survey on fan-beam computed tomography for radiotherapy: Current implementation and future perspectives of motion management and surface guidance devices. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100523. [PMID: 38187170 PMCID: PMC10767488 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose This work reports on the results of a survey performed on the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging for motion management, surface guidance devices, and their quality assurance (QA). Additionally, it details the collected user insights regarding professional needs in CT for radiotherapy. The purpose of the survey is to understand current practice, professional needs and future directions in the field of fan-beam CT in radiation therapy (RT). Materials and methods An online institutional survey was conducted between 1-Sep-2022 and 10-Oct-2022 among medical physics experts at Belgian and Dutch radiotherapy institutions, to assess the current status, challenges, and future directions of motion management and surface image-guided radiotherapy. The survey consisted of a maximum of 143 questions, with the exact number depending on participants' responses. Results The response rate was 66 % (31/47). Respiratory management was reported as standard practice in all but one institution; surface imaging during CT-simulation was reported in ten institutions. QA procedures are applied with varying frequencies and methodologies, primarily with commercial anatomy-like phantoms. Surface guidance users report employing commercial static and dynamic phantoms. Four main subjects are considered clinically important by the respondents: surface guidance, CT protocol optimisation, implementing gated imaging (4DCT, breath-hold), and a tattoo-less workflow. Conclusions The survey highlights the scattered pattern of QA procedures for respiratory motion management, indicating the need for well-defined, unambiguous, and practicable guidelines. Surface guidance is considered one of the most important techniques that should be implemented in the clinical radiotherapy simulation workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sima Qamhiyeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert Kaatee
- Radiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Joke De Rouck
- Department of Radiotherapy, AZ Sint Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Esther Decabooter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koen Salvo
- Department of Radiotherapy, AZ Sint-Maarten, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Jacobus van Wingerden
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Leidschendam, the Netherlands
| | - Hilde Bosmans
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
- Medical Physics and Quality Assessment, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Brent van der Heyden
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- IBiTech-MEDISIP, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Geert Pittomvils
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Evelien Bogaert
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Decabooter E, Hilgers GC, De Rouck J, Salvo K, Van Wingerden J, Bosmans H, van der Heyden B, Qamhiyeh S, Papalazarou C, Kaatee R, Pittomvils G, Bogaert E. Survey on fan-beam computed tomography for radiotherapy: Imaging for dose calculation and delineation. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100522. [PMID: 38152701 PMCID: PMC10750173 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To obtain an understanding of current practice, professional needs and future directions in the field of fan-beam CT in RT, a survey was conducted. This work presents the collected information regarding the use of CT imaging for dose calculation and structure delineation. Materials and methods An online institutional survey was distributed to medical physics experts employed at Belgian and Dutch radiotherapy institutions to assess the status, challenges, and future directions of QA practices for fan-beam CT. A maximum of 143 questions covered topics such as CT scanner availability, CT scanner specifications, QA protocols, treatment simulation workflow, and radiotherapy dose calculation. Answer forms were collected between 1-Sep-2022 and 10-Oct-2022. Results A 66 % response rate was achieved, yielding data on a total of 58 CT scanners. For MV photon therapy, all single-energy CT scans are reconstructed in Hounsfield Units for delineation or dose calculation, and a direct- or stoichiometric method was used to convert CT numbers for dose calculation. Limited use of dual-energy CT is reported for photon (N = 3) and proton dose calculations (N = 1). For brachytherapy, most institutions adopt water-based dose calculation, while approximately 26 % of the institutions take tissue heterogeneity into account. Commissioning and regular QA include eleven tasks, which are performed by two or more professions (29/31) with varying frequencies. Conclusions Dual usage of a planning CT limits protocol optimization for both tissue characterization and delineation. DECT has been implemented only gradually. A variation of QA testing frequencies and tests are reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Decabooter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joke De Rouck
- Department of Radiotherapy, AZ Sint Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Salvo
- Department of Radiotherapy, AZ Sint-Maarten, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Jacobus Van Wingerden
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde Bosmans
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | - Brent van der Heyden
- IBiTech-MEDISIP, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sima Qamhiyeh
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chrysi Papalazarou
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Kaatee
- Radiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Pittomvils
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Evelien Bogaert
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sasaki M, Matsushita N, Fujimoto T, Nakata M, Ono Y, Yoshimura M, Mizowaki T. New patient setup procedure using surface-guided imaging to reduce body touch and skin marks in whole-breast irradiation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Radiol Phys Technol 2023; 16:422-429. [PMID: 37474738 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00735-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new patient-setup procedure using surface-guided imaging during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for left-sided whole-breast irradiation with deep inspiration breath-hold. Two setup procedures were compared regarding patient positioning accuracy for the first 22 patients. The first was a traditional setup (T-setup) procedure that used a surface-guided system after patient setup with traditional skin marks and lasers. The second procedure involved a new setup (N-setup) that used only a surface-guided system. The positioning accuracy of the remaining 23 patients was assessed using a setup that combined marker reduction and the N-setup procedure. No significant difference was observed in positioning accuracy between the two setups. The positioning accuracy of the marker-reduction setup was within 3 mm in all directions. The N-setup procedure may be a useful strategy for preventing infection during or after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Sasaki
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Norimasa Matsushita
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takahiro Fujimoto
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Manabu Nakata
- Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Kawahara-Cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Yuka Ono
- Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Michio Yoshimura
- Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Steiner E, Healy B, Baldock C. Dose from imaging at the time of treatment should be reduced. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:959-962. [PMID: 37436603 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01298-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Steiner
- Institute for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, LK Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Brendan Healy
- Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Clive Baldock
- Graduate Research School, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2747, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Darréon J, Massabeau C, Geffroy C, Maroun P, Simon L. Surface-guided radiotherapy overview: Technical aspects and clinical applications. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:504-510. [PMID: 37558608 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
In radiotherapy, patient positioning has long been ensured by ionizing imaging (kV or MV). Over the past ten years, surface-guided radiotherapy has appeared in radiotherapy departments. It is a continuous three-dimensional acquisition of the surface of the patient, based on the use of several optical cameras. The acquired surface is compared to an expected surface (usually taken from the planning scanner). Operators can constantly appreciate poor position, anatomical deformity or patient shift. Thus, the system allows an aid to the positioning of the patient, possibly without tattooing, but also a follow-up of the patient during the duration of the session. The most obvious contribution of the system concerns the treatment of the breast. In fact, for this location, the bone registration is not ideal and the target is visible in surface-guided radiotherapy. These systems also make it possible to treat in deep inspiration breath hold. But several other locations can benefit from it (pelvis, thorax, etc.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Darréon
- Medical Physics Department, institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
| | - C Massabeau
- Département de radiothérapie, Oncopole Claudius-Regaud (OCR), institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (IUCT O), Toulouse, France
| | - C Geffroy
- Centre Eugène-Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - P Maroun
- Institut radiothérapie Sud de l'Oise, Creil, France
| | - L Simon
- Département de radiothérapie, Oncopole Claudius-Regaud (OCR), institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (IUCT O), Toulouse, France; Inserm, équipe Radopt, CNRS, centre de recherches en cancérologie de Toulouse (CRCT), université Paul-Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Douglass M, Gorayski P, Patel S, Santos A. Synthetic cranial MRI from 3D optical surface scans using deep learning for radiation therapy treatment planning. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:367-375. [PMID: 36752996 PMCID: PMC10030422 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01229-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optical scanning technologies are increasingly being utilised to supplement treatment workflows in radiation oncology, such as surface-guided radiotherapy or 3D printing custom bolus. One limitation of optical scanning devices is the absence of internal anatomical information of the patient being scanned. As a result, conventional radiation therapy treatment planning using this imaging modality is not feasible. Deep learning is useful for automating various manual tasks in radiation oncology, most notably, organ segmentation and treatment planning. Deep learning models have also been used to transform MRI datasets into synthetic CT datasets, facilitating the development of MRI-only radiation therapy planning. AIMS To train a pix2pix generative adversarial network to transform 3D optical scan data into estimated MRI datasets for a given patient to provide additional anatomical data for a select few radiation therapy treatment sites. The proposed network may provide useful anatomical information for treatment planning of surface mould brachytherapy, total body irradiation, and total skin electron therapy, for example, without delivering any imaging dose. METHODS A 2D pix2pix GAN was trained on 15,000 axial MRI slices of healthy adult brains paired with corresponding external mask slices. The model was validated on a further 5000 previously unseen external mask slices. The predictions were compared with the "ground-truth" MRI slices using the multi-scale structural similarity index (MSSI) metric. A certified neuro-radiologist was subsequently consulted to provide an independent review of the model's performance in terms of anatomical accuracy and consistency. The network was then applied to a 3D photogrammetry scan of a test subject to demonstrate the feasibility of this novel technique. RESULTS The trained pix2pix network predicted MRI slices with a mean MSSI of 0.831 ± 0.057 for the 5000 validation images indicating that it is possible to estimate a significant proportion of a patient's gross cranial anatomy from a patient's exterior contour. When independently reviewed by a certified neuro-radiologist, the model's performance was described as "quite amazing, but there are limitations in the regions where there is wide variation within the normal population." When the trained network was applied to a 3D model of a human subject acquired using optical photogrammetry, the network could estimate the corresponding MRI volume for that subject with good qualitative accuracy. However, a ground-truth MRI baseline was not available for quantitative comparison. CONCLUSIONS A deep learning model was developed, to transform 3D optical scan data of a patient into an estimated MRI volume, potentially increasing the usefulness of optical scanning in radiation therapy planning. This work has demonstrated that much of the human cranial anatomy can be predicted from the external shape of the head and may provide an additional source of valuable imaging data. Further research is required to investigate the feasibility of this approach for use in a clinical setting and further improve the model's accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Douglass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, SAHMRI, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, SAHMRI, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- University of South Australia, Allied Health & Human Performance, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Sandy Patel
- Department of Radiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Alexandre Santos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- Australian Bragg Centre for Proton Therapy and Research, SAHMRI, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Freislederer P, Batista V, Öllers M, Buschmann M, Steiner E, Kügele M, Fracchiolla F, Corradini S, de Smet M, Moura F, Perryck S, Dionisi F, Nguyen D, Bert C, Lehmann J. ESTRO-ACROP guideline on surface guided radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:188-196. [PMID: 35661677 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Surface guidance systems enable patient positioning and motion monitoring without using ionising radiation. Surface Guided Radiation Therapy (SGRT) has therefore been widely adopted in radiation therapy in recent years, but guidelines on workflows and specific quality assurance (QA) are lacking. This ESTRO-ACROP guideline aims to give recommendations concerning SGRT roles and responsibilities and highlights common challenges and potential errors. Comprehensive guidelines for procurement, acceptance, commissioning, and QA of SGRT systems installed on computed tomography (CT) simulators, C-arm linacs, closed-bore linacs, and particle therapy treatment systems are presented that will help move to a consensus among SGRT users and facilitate a safe and efficient implementation and clinical application of SGRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Freislederer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| | - V Batista
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Öllers
- Department of Radiotherapy, MAASTRO, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M Buschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH Wien, Austria
| | - E Steiner
- Institute for Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - M Kügele
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - F Fracchiolla
- Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS) Protontherapy Department, Trento, Italy
| | - S Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - M de Smet
- Department of Medical Physics & Instrumentation, Institute Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - F Moura
- Hospital CUF Descobertas, Department of Radiation Oncology, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - S Perryck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland
| | - F Dionisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - D Nguyen
- Centre de Radiothérapie de Mâcon, France
| | - C Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
| | - J Lehmann
- Radiation Oncology Department, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Australia; School of Information and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Australia; Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|