Quality of intraoperatively salvaged unwashed blood in hip arthroplasty

Successful management of catastrophic peripheral vascular hemorrhage using massive autotransfusion and damage control surgery in a dog

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of massive transfusion using unwashed, non-anticoagulated, nonsterile autologous blood in a dog with catastrophic hemorrhage from a peripheral vessel during orthopedic surgery. A damage control surgical strategy was also employed.

CASE SUMMARY

A 6-year-old, 48 kg neutered male Labrador Retriever experienced massive hemorrhage after transection of a large blood vessel while undergoing femoral head and neck osteotomy. Blood was collected from clean, but not sterile, suction canisters and clots were skimmed off. The blood was then transfused back to the dog using a standard in-line blood filter. Approximately 58% of the dog's blood volume was autotransfused in less than 2 hours, thereby meeting the criteria for massive transfusion. Surgery was aborted after hemostasis was achieved by ligation of the vessel and packing of the surgical site. Two units of fresh frozen plasma were administered postoperatively due to the development of a coagulopathy. Hemoglobinuria developed but resolved within 18 hours. Three days later, completion of the surgical procedure was performed without incident. The dog was discharged 4 days after the initial surgery. Marked swelling of the affected limb developed, but resolved after the sixth day. No other significant complications developed.

NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED

In this case report, the authors describe the successful management of catastrophic hemorrhage with autotransfusion performed in the absence of sterile collection, cell washing, or anticoagulation. Although not ideal, autotransfusion under these conditions can be lifesaving in situations of massive hemorrhage. This case also highlighted the employment of a damage control surgical strategy.

Dynamic changes in clot formation determined using thromboelastometry after reinfusion of unwashed anticoagulated cell-salvaged whole blood in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Cell salvage is a key part of patient blood management. Different techniques are available for salvaging blood. A new intra-operative autotransfusion filter system became available for reinfusion of unwashed whole blood. Concern exists regarding whether this technique induces coagulation disturbances, offsetting the benefits of the reinfusion of autologous blood. This study was designed to investigate the content of intra-operatively salvaged filtered blood and its impact after reinfusion on clot formation in patients undergoing primary hip arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty were enrolled in the study. Cell salvage was performed using a new intra-operative autotransfusion filter system. Before surgery and within 1 hour of reinfusion of 300 mL or more of salvaged whole blood, blood samples were taken to assess clot formation by thromboelastometry and standard laboratory-based coagulation profiling. Cytokine content of the salvaged blood was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS

Following reinfusion of 460 mL (median) of salvaged blood, thromboelastometry showed normal clot formation and did not indicate a coagulopathy. Clotting time, clot formation time, maximum firmness and maximum lysis all remained within the normal range. Standard laboratory coagulation tests were also normal in all patients before surgery and after reinfusion. Although monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels were higher than normal, all other measured cytokines were either undetectable or within the normal range. No adverse events were seen following cell salvage.

DISCUSSION

Reinfusion of unwashed salvaged whole blood did not alter clot formation in our patients. The results add to the knowledge about this approach and contribute to the growing body of evidence regarding the lack of adverse events when reinfusing unwashed shed blood in major orthopaedic procedures.

[Thromboelastometric profile of unwashed shed blood after primary knee arthroplasty]

INTRODUCTION

Knee arthroplasty causes significant blood loss. Different blood-saving measures exist like retransfusion of unwashed salvaged blood. Some studies question the quality of this blood and in particular its ability to clot. These studies use "static" coagulation tests reflecting only partially the reality, unlike viscoelastic methods. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the salvaged blood thromboelastometric profile using ROTEM® system and to compare these results with patient venous blood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an observational, prospective, single-center study conducted over 3 months in 2013. Agreement of local ethical committee and patient consent were obtained beforehand. All adult patients who underwent a primary total knee arthroplasty were included. A thromboelastometric profile and standard laboratory tests (hemoglobin, platelets count, PT, aPTT, fibrinogen) were performed in the same time on patient venous blood and on unwashed salvaged blood in the PACU.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included. The median duration of surgery was 93 minutes. Thirteen patients (65%) received tranexamic acid during procedure. The median volume of shed blood was 225 mL. Two patients (10%) received a reinfusion. Analysis of shed blood showed a major deficiency of clotting factor in standard biology (PT<10%) and an absence of clot formation in thromboelastometric test (In-tem®, Ex-tem®, Fib-tem® or Ap-tem®). Compared to venous blood, shed blood had significantly lower hemoglobin levels: 8.8 vs 13.5 g/dL (P<0.0001). Allogenic transfusion concerned 5% of patients.

DISCUSSION

In this work, we confirmed that shed blood was naturally uncoagulable probably due to a multifactorial mechanism involving a major clot factor deficiency and an activation of fibrinolysis.

Effects of the Sangvia blood collection system on patients undergoing elective hip surgery

We have conducted a randomized controlled study where 164 patients were randomized to receive autologous salvaged blood collected by Sangvia™ Blood Salvage System or allogeneic red cell concentrates if transfusion was indicated by clinical judgement. The study was powered to detect if transfusion of autologous blood reduced the occurrence of postoperative infections. We found no statistical significant difference in postoperative infection rate between the groups, but this may be due to the fact that postoperative infections were diagnosed in only five patients. Increased C-reactive protein concentrations slightly above level of significance indicate that autologous blood transfusions stimulate the patient's immune system. However, there was no indication of increased transfusion reaction rate, including febrile reactions, in the autologous group. Transfusion of autologous blood did not reduce the use of allogeneic red cell concentrates. The mean use of allogeneic red cell concentrates was 0.93 units (both groups combined), indicating that the transfusion policy may have been too liberal. There was a highly significant inverse correlation between pre-operative haemoglobin concentration and transfusion of allogeneic blood. In a patient population with a low frequency of postoperative infection, a larger study is needed to clarify if autologous salvaged blood protects against postoperative infections.