1
|
Sasadeusz J, Grigg A, Hughes PD, Lee Lim S, Lucas M, McColl G, McLachlan SA, Peters MG, Shackel N, Slavin M, Sundararajan V, Thompson A, Doyle J, Rickard J, De Cruz P, Gish RG, Visvanathan K. Screening and Prophylaxis to Prevent Hepatitis B Reactivation: Transplant Recipients. Clin Liver Dis 2019; 23:493-509. [PMID: 31266623 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2019.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Organ transplantation is a lifesaving procedure for many patients. To prevent rejection or graft-versus-host disease, recipients require long-term immunosuppression. In patients who have ever been exposed to hepatitis B, it is possible for reactivation to occur; this includes patients who are anti-hepatitis B core antibody-positive only or both anti-hepatitis B core antibody-positive and hepatitis B surface antibody-positive. The susceptibility to this varies with the nature of the transplant. Hepatitis B can be transmitted from donor to recipient. It is important to assess the hepatitis B status and formulate a strategy to prevent transmission and prevent reactivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe Sasadeusz
- Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Elizabeth Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia; University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
| | - Andrew Grigg
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Hospital, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Peter D Hughes
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
| | - Seng Lee Lim
- National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119077, Singapore
| | - Michaela Lucas
- University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Geoff McColl
- University of Queensland Oral Health Centre, 288 Herston Road, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - Sue Anne McLachlan
- St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
| | - Marion G Peters
- University of California, San Francisco, S357 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Nicholas Shackel
- Ingham Institute, 1 Campbell Street, Liverpool, Sydney, New South Wales 2170, Australia
| | - Monica Slavin
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia; Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
| | - Vijaya Sundararajan
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia; Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Plenty Road, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
| | - Alexander Thompson
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
| | - Joseph Doyle
- The Alfred and Monash University, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia; Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
| | - James Rickard
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Research Institute, Austin Hospital, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
| | - Peter De Cruz
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Robert G Gish
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Kumar Visvanathan
- University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Victoria Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huprikar S, Danziger-Isakov L, Ahn J, Naugler S, Blumberg E, Avery RK, Koval C, Lease ED, Pillai A, Doucette KE, Levitsky J, Morris MI, Lu K, McDermott JK, Mone T, Orlowski JP, Dadhania DM, Abbott K, Horslen S, Laskin BL, Mougdil A, Venkat VL, Korenblat K, Kumar V, Grossi P, Bloom RD, Brown K, Kotton CN, Kumar D. Solid organ transplantation from hepatitis B virus-positive donors: consensus guidelines for recipient management. Am J Transplant 2015; 15:1162-72. [PMID: 25707744 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2014] [Revised: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 12/24/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Use of organs from donors testing positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) may safely expand the donor pool. The American Society of Transplantation convened a multidisciplinary expert panel that reviewed the existing literature and developed consensus recommendations for recipient management following the use of organs from HBV positive donors. Transmission risk is highest with liver donors and significantly lower with non-liver (kidney and thoracic) donors. Antiviral prophylaxis significantly reduces the rate of transmission to liver recipients from isolated HBV core antibody positive (anti-HBc+) donors. Organs from anti-HBc+ donors should be considered for all adult transplant candidates after an individualized assessment of the risks and benefits and appropriate patient consent. Indefinite antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in liver recipients with no immunity or vaccine immunity but not in liver recipients with natural immunity. Antiviral prophylaxis may be considered for up to 1 year in susceptible non-liver recipients but is not recommended in immune non-liver recipients. Although no longer the treatment of choice in patients with chronic HBV, lamivudine remains the most cost-effective choice for prophylaxis in this setting. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Huprikar
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
MacConmara MP, Vachharajani N, Wellen JR, Anderson CD, Lowell JA, Shenoy S, Chapman WC, Doyle MBM. Utilization of hepatitis B core antibody-positive donor liver grafts. HPB (Oxford) 2012; 14:42-8. [PMID: 22151450 PMCID: PMC3252990 DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00399.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The inclusion of hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) liver donors is a strategy utilized to increase organ availability. This study examined HBcAb+ transplantation practices to identify specific factors influencing outcomes. METHODS Twenty-five HBcAb+ liver transplants were identified retrospectively among 868 adult transplants performed between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2009. Twelve (48%) recipients had hepatitis C and five (20%) had hepatitis B. Patient and donor demographics, preoperative morbidity, transplant data and outcomes were examined. Statistical analysis was completed using Student's t-test or the Kaplan-Meier method. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS There was no difference in age, body mass index or comorbidities between HBcAb+ liver recipients and control subjects. Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores of >30 were significantly more frequent in HBcAb+ liver recipients (32% vs. 15%; P= 0.04). All patients received immunoglobulin and longterm antiviral therapy as prophylaxis against graft hepatitis B resurgence. No patients who received HBcAb+ livers developed hepatitis B infection on follow-up. Overall survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years in HBcAb+ liver recipients was 92%, 74% and 74%, respectively, compared with 96%, 89% and 76%, respectively, in the control group (P= not significant, log-rank test). All except one of the deaths in the HBcAb+ liver recipient group occurred within 90 days postoperatively and in patients with MELD scores >30. CONCLUSIONS The practice of transplanting HBcAb+ grafts incurs low risk for infection using current methods of prophylaxis. The highest mortality risk was in the early postoperative period, specifically in patients with very high MELD scores. This probably reflects the practice of using positive serology grafts in emergent situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malcolm P MacConmara
- Section of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The inclusion of hepatitis B core antibody-positive (HBcAb+) liver donors is a strategy utilized to increase organ availability. This study examined HBcAb+ transplantation practices to identify specific factors influencing outcomes. METHODS Twenty-five HBcAb+ liver transplants were identified retrospectively among 868 adult transplants performed between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2009. Twelve (48%) recipients had hepatitis C and five (20%) had hepatitis B. Patient and donor demographics, preoperative morbidity, transplant data and outcomes were examined. Statistical analysis was completed using Student's t-test or the Kaplan-Meier method. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS There was no difference in age, body mass index or comorbidities between HBcAb+ liver recipients and control subjects. Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores of >30 were significantly more frequent in HBcAb+ liver recipients (32% vs. 15%; P= 0.04). All patients received immunoglobulin and longterm antiviral therapy as prophylaxis against graft hepatitis B resurgence. No patients who received HBcAb+ livers developed hepatitis B infection on follow-up. Overall survival at 30 days, 1 year and 5 years in HBcAb+ liver recipients was 92%, 74% and 74%, respectively, compared with 96%, 89% and 76%, respectively, in the control group (P= not significant, log-rank test). All except one of the deaths in the HBcAb+ liver recipient group occurred within 90 days postoperatively and in patients with MELD scores >30. CONCLUSIONS The practice of transplanting HBcAb+ grafts incurs low risk for infection using current methods of prophylaxis. The highest mortality risk was in the early postoperative period, specifically in patients with very high MELD scores. This probably reflects the practice of using positive serology grafts in emergent situations.
Collapse
|
6
|
Avelino-Silva VI, D'Albuquerque LAC, Bonazzi PR, Song ATW, Miraglia JL, De Brito Neves A, Abdala E. Liver transplant from Anti-HBc-positive, HBsAg-negative donor into HBsAg-negative recipient: is it safe? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Transplant 2011; 24:735-46. [PMID: 20438579 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01254.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION After liver transplant (LT) from Anti-HBc+/HBsAg- donors into HBsAg- recipients, transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) may occur (de novo HBV infection). This study analyzes the incidence of de novo HBV infection in HBsAg- recipients of Anti-HBc+/HBsAg- LT with respect to: (i) the recipients' HBV serology and (ii) the type of preventive therapy adopted. METHODS A systematic review of the literature using the electronic database Medline. RESULTS Five hundred and fifty-two LT in 36 articles were selected. Lamivudine, Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG), revaccination, and combined therapies were employed in multiple strategies as preventive interventions. Naïve recipients had a high risk of de novo HBV infection, with smaller incidences when HBIG and lamivudine were used, either alone or in association. Vaccinated recipients or those with isolated hepatitis B core antibodies (Anti-HBc) and previous HBV infection had lower risks of viral transmission, additionally reduced by any prophylaxis adoption. DISCUSSION LT from Anti-HBc+/HBsAg- donors into HBsAg- recipients is apparently safe, as long as the recipient is vaccinated or presents an isolated Anti-HBc or previous HBV infection and some prophylaxis is employed. Currently lamivudine seems the best alternative; other nucleoside analogs and revaccination strategies should be considered in future studies. Follow-up and preventive therapies should be maintained for five yr or preferably throughout the recipients' life span.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Iida Avelino-Silva
- Division of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Clinics Hospital Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|