Risk Factors and Survival Impact of Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation in a Single Institution

Temporal correlation between postreperfusion complement deposition and severe primary graft dysfunction in lung allografts

Growing evidence implicates complement in the pathogenesis of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). We hypothesized that early complement activation postreperfusion could predispose to severe PGD grade 3 (PGD-3) at 72 hours, which is associated with worst posttransplant outcomes. Consecutive lung transplant patients (n = 253) from January 2018 through June 2023 underwent timed open allograft biopsies at the end of cold ischemia (internal control) and 30 minutes postreperfusion. PGD-3 at 72 hours occurred in 14% (35/253) of patients; 17% (44/253) revealed positive C4d staining on postreperfusion allograft biopsy, and no biopsy-related complications were encountered. Significantly more patients with PGD-3 at 72 hours had positive C4d staining at 30 minutes postreperfusion compared with those without (51% vs 12%, P < .001). Conversely, patients with positive C4d staining were significantly more likely to develop PGD-3 at 72 hours (41% vs 8%, P < .001) and experienced worse long-term outcomes. In multivariate logistic regression, positive C4d staining remained highly predictive of PGD-3 (odds ratio 7.92, 95% confidence interval 2.97-21.1, P < .001). Hence, early complement deposition in allografts is highly predictive of PGD-3 at 72 hours. Our data support future studies to evaluate the role of complement inhibition in patients with early postreperfusion complement activation to mitigate PGD and improve transplant outcomes.

Postreperfusion Pulmonary Artery Pressure Indicates Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplant

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction is a risk factor of early mortality after lung transplant. Models identifying patients at high risk for primary graft dysfunction are limited. We hypothesize high postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure is a clinical marker for primary graft dysfunction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 158 consecutive lung transplants performed at a single academic center from January 2020 through July 2022. Only bilateral lung transplants were included and patients with pretransplant extracorporeal life support were excluded.

RESULTS

Primary graft dysfunction occurred in 42.3% (n = 30). Patients with primary graft dysfunction had higher postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure (41 ± 9.1 mm Hg) than those without (31.5 ± 8.8 mm Hg) (P < .001). Logistic regression showed postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure is a predictor for primary graft dysfunction (odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.24, P < .001). Postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure of 37 mm Hg was optimal for predicting primary graft dysfunction by Youden index. The receiver operating characteristic curve of postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure at 37 mm Hg (sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.78, area under the curve 0.81), was superior to the prereperfusion pressure curve at 36 mm Hg (sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.39, area under the curve 0.57) (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure after lung transplant is predictive of primary graft dysfunction. Postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure is more indicative of primary graft dysfunction than prereperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure. Using postreperfusion systolic pulmonary artery pressure as a positive signal of primary graft dysfunction allows earlier intervention, which could improve outcomes.

Development and validation of a nomogram model to predict primary graft dysfunction in patients after lung transplantation based on the clinical factors

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD), a significant complication that can affect patients' prognosis and quality of life, develops within 72 h post lung transplantation (LTx). Early detection and prevention of PGD should be given special consideration. The purpose of this study was to create a clinical prediction model to forecast the occurrence of PGD.

METHODS

We collected information on 622 LTx patients from Wuxi People's Hospital from 2016 to 2020 and used the data to construct the prediction model. Information on 224 patients from 2021 to June 2022 was used for external validation. We used LASSO regression for variable screening. A nomogram was developed for model presentation. Distinctness, fit, and calibration were used to evaluate the performance of the model.

RESULTS

Subjects with respiratory failure, who received fresh frozen plasma, donor age, donor gender, donor mechanism of death, donor smoking, donor ventilator use time, and donor PaO 2/FiO 2 ratio were independent predictor variables for the occurrence of PGD. The area under the curve of the nomogram was .779. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a good model fit (P = .158). The calibration curve of the nomogram is fairly close to the ideal diagonal. Moreover, the decision curve analysis revealed a positive net benefit of the model. External validation also confirmed the reliability of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram of PGD based on clinical risk factors in postoperative LTx patients was established with high reliability. It provides clinicians and nurses with a new and effective tool for early prediction of PGD and early intervention.

Primary Graft Dysfunction: The Role of Aging in Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

Transplant centers around the world have been using extended criteria donors to remedy the ongoing demand for lung transplantation. With a rapidly aging population, older donors are increasingly considered. Donor age, at the same time has been linked to higher rates of lung ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). This process of acute, sterile inflammation occurring upon reperfusion is a key driver of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) leading to inferior short- and long-term survival. Understanding and improving the condition of older lungs is thus critical to optimize outcomes. Notably, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) seems to have the potential of reconditioning ischemic lungs through ex-vivo perfusing and ventilation. Here, we aim to delineate mechanisms driving lung IRI and review both experimental and clinical data on the effects of aging in augmenting the consequences of IRI and PGD in lung transplantation.

Factors affecting complications development and mortality after single lung transplant

Lung transplantation (LT) is a life-saving therapeutic procedure that prolongs survival in patients with end-stage lung disease. Furthermore, as a therapeutic option for high-risk candidates, single LT (SLT) can be feasible because the immediate morbidity and mortality after transplantation are lower compared to sequential single (double) LT (SSLTx). Still, the long-term overall survival is, in general, better for SSLTx. Despite the great success over the years, the early post-SLT period remains a perilous time for these patients. Patients who undergo SLT are predisposed to evolving early or late postoperative complications. This review emphasizes factors leading to post-SLT complications in the early and late periods including primary graft dysfunction and chronic lung allograft dysfunction, native lung complications, anastomosis complications, infections, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, and metabolite complications, and their association with morbidity and mortality in these patients. Furthermore, we discuss the incidence of malignancy after SLT and their correlation with immunosuppression therapy.

Incidence of primary graft dysfunction is higher according to the new ISHLT 2016 guidelines and correlates with clinical and molecular risk factors

Background

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the most important determinant of morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation, but its definition has evolved over the past decade. The implications of this refinement in clinical definition have not been evaluated. In this single-center study, we compared PGD incidence, risk factors, and outcomes using the 2005 and the updated-2016 International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for PGD grading in lung transplant patients.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we extracted data from the medical records of 127 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 1/1/2016–12/31/2018. PGD was defined as PGD3 present at 48 and/or 72 hours post-reperfusion. We used the 2005 and the updated 2016 guidelines to assess clinical risk factors, outcomes, and baseline biomarkers for PGD.

Results

On the basis of the 2016 and 2005 guidelines, we identified PGD in 37% and 26% of patients, respectively. PGD was significantly associated with extracorporeal life support, large body mass index, and restrictive lung disease using the 2016 but not the 2005 guidelines. Based on the 2016 guidelines, pretransplant levels of several biomarkers were associated with PGD; using the 2005 guidelines, only increased interleukin-2 levels were significantly associated with PGD. No preoperative biomarkers were associated with PGD using either guidelines after adjusting for clinical variables. Postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality were similar regardless of guidelines used.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that refinements in the PGD scoring system have improved the detection of graft injury and associated risk factors without changing its ability to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Primary Graft Dysfunction

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of acute lung injury after transplantation characterized by hypoxemia and the development of alveolar infiltrates on chest radiograph that occurs within 72 hours of reperfusion. PGD is among the most common early complications following lung transplantation and significantly contributes to increased short-term morbidity and mortality. In addition, severe PGD has been associated with higher 90-day and 1-year mortality rates compared with absent or less severe PGD and is a significant risk factor for the subsequent development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation released updated consensus guidelines in 2017, defining grade 3 PGD, the most severe form, by the presence of alveolar infiltrates and a ratio of PaO₂:FiO₂ less than 200. Multiple donor-related, recipient-related, and perioperative risk factors for PGD have been identified, many of which are potentially modifiable. Consistently identified risk factors include donor tobacco and alcohol use; increased recipient body mass index; recipient history of pulmonary hypertension, sarcoidosis, or pulmonary fibrosis; single lung transplantation; and use of cardiopulmonary bypass, among others. Several cellular pathways have been implicated in the pathogenesis of PGD, thus presenting several possible therapeutic targets for preventing and treating PGD. Notably, use of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has become more widespread and offers a potential platform to safely investigate novel PGD treatments while expanding the lung donor pool. Even in the presence of significantly prolonged ischemic times, EVLP has not been associated with an increased risk for PGD.

Review 2: Primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant-pathophysiology, clinical considerations and therapeutic targets

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is one of the most common complications in the early postoperative period and is the most common cause of death in the first postoperative month. The underlying pathophysiology is thought to be the ischaemia–reperfusion injury that occurs during the storage and reperfusion of the lung engraftment; this triggers a cascade of pathological changes, which result in pulmonary vascular dysfunction and loss of the normal alveolar architecture. There are a number of surgical and anaesthetic factors which may be related to the development of PGD. To date, although treatment options for PGD are limited, there are several promising experimental therapeutic targets. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology, clinical management and potential therapeutic targets of PGD.

Long non-coding RNA X-inactive specific transcript silencing ameliorates primary graft dysfunction following lung transplantation through microRNA-21-dependent mechanism

Background

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a known acute lung injury (ALI) and a major cause of fatality post-lung transplantation. Though some long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been studied in ALI through regulation of microRNAs (miRNAs), their effects on PGD remain undefined. The present study aims to explore the underlying mechanism of lncRNA X-inactive specific transcript (XIST) in PGD after lung transplantation.

Methods

Initially, the expression of miR-21, IL-12A and XIST was determined by RT-qPCR and western blot analysis. The dual luciferase reporter assay, RNA pull-down and RIP assay were performed to identify the targeting relationship between miR-21 and IL-12A and the binding relationship between miR-21 and XIST. Loss- and gain-of-function investigations were conducted in rats treated with prolonged cold ischemia and polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs).

Findings

miR-21 was decreased, whilst XIST and IL-12A were increased in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of PGD patients after lung transplantation. Enhanced miR-21 expression in rats and PMNs resulted in downregulated expression of pro-inflammatory factors and chemokines, and enhanced the apoptosis of PMNs. XIST was found to upregulate IL-12A expression in a miR-21-dependent manner. Additionally, XIST silencing enhanced the apoptosis of PMNs and inhibited the neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation through upregulation of miR-21 but downregulation of IL-12A in vivo.

Interpretation

In summary, lncRNA XIST upregulates IL-12A by binding to miR-21, thereby inducing NET formation and accelerating PGD after lung transplantation. This suggests that inhibition of XIST and NET may be beneficial for the treatment of PGD.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Lung Transplantation: Initial Experience at a Single Brazilian Center

OBJECTIVE

To report initial experience from the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients who received lung transplantation.

METHODS

Retrospective study of a single tertiary center in the Brazilian state of São Paulo, a national reference in lung transplantation, based on the prospective collection of data from electronic medical records. The period analyzed extended from January 2009 (beginning of the program) until December 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 75 lung transplants were performed, with ECMO used in 8 (10.7%) cases. Of the patients, 4 (50%) were female. The mean age was 46.4±14.3 years. The causes of the end-stage lung disease that led to transplantation were pulmonary arterial hypertension in 3 (37.5%) patients, bronchiectasis in 2 (25%) patients, pulmonary fibrosis in 2 (25%) patients, and pulmonary emphysema in 1 (12.5%) patient. In our series, 7 (87.5%) cases were sequential bilateral transplantations. Prioritization was necessary in 4 (50%) patients, and in 1 patient, ECMO was used as a bridge to transplantation. The ECMO route was central in 4 (50%), peripheral venovenous in 2 (25%) and peripheral venoarterial in 2 (25%) patients. The mean length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 14±7.5 days and of the hospital stay was 34.1±34.2 days. The mean ECMO duration was 9.3±6.6 days with a 50% decannulation rate. Three patients were discharged (37.5%).

CONCLUSION

Lung transplantation requires complex treatment, and ECMO has allowed extending the indications for transplantation and provided adjuvant support in the clinical management of these patients.

Mitigation of Primary Graft Dysfunction in Lung Transplantation: Current Understanding and Hopes for the Future

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a form of acute lung injury that develops within the first 72 hours after lung transplantation. The overall incidence of PGD is estimated to be around 30%, and the 30-day mortality for grade 3 PGD around 36%. PGD is also associated with the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, a specific form of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. In this article, we will discuss perioperative strategies for PGD prevention as well as possible future avenues for prevention and treatment.

Using machine learning to estimate survival curves for patients receiving an increased risk for disease transmission heart, liver, or lung versus waiting for a standard organ

Introduction

Over 19% of deceased organ donors are labeled increased risk for disease transmission (IRD) for viral blood‐borne disease transmission. Many potential organ recipients need to decide between accepting an IRD organ offer and waiting for a non–IRD organ.

Methods

Using machine learning and simulation, we built transplant and waitlist survival models and compared the survival for patients accepting IRD organ offers or waiting for non–IRD organs for the heart, liver, and lung. The simulation consisted of generating 20 000 different scenarios of a recipient either receiving an IRD organ or waiting and receiving a non–IRD organ.

Results

In the simulations, the 5‐year survival probabilities of heart, liver, and lung recipients who accepted IRD organ offers increased on average by 10.2%, 12.7%, and 7.2%, respectively, compared with receiving a non–IRD organ after average wait times (190, 228, and 223 days, respectively). When the estimated waitlist time was at least 5 days for the liver, and 1 day for the heart and lung, 50% or more of the simulations resulted in a higher chance of 5‐year survival when the patient received an IRD organ versus when the patient remained on the waitlist. We also developed a simple equation to estimate the benefits, in terms of 5‐year survival probabilities, of receiving an IRD organ versus waiting for a non–IRD organ, for a particular set of recipient/donor characteristics.

Conclusion

For all three organs, the majority of patients are predicted to have higher 5‐year survival accepting an IRD organ offer compared with waiting for a non–IRD organ.

Effects of Smoking on Solid Organ Transplantation Outcomes

Tobacco smoking is the leading preventable cause of death worldwide. Both donor and recipient smoking have been shown to increase graft loss and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients in many studies. Only in lung transplants is smoking a universal contraindication to transplantation. Transplant centers implement different policies regarding smoking recipients and allografts from smoking donors. Due to scarcity of available allografts, the risks of smoking have to be weighed against the risks of a longer transplant waitlist period. Although transplant centers implement different strategies to encourage smoking cessation pre- and post-transplant, not many studies have been published that validate the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions in this vulnerable population. This article summarizes the results of studies investigating prevalence, impact on outcomes, and cessationinterventions for smoking in the transplant population. We report herein a review of the elevated risks of infection, malignancy, graft loss, cardiovascular events, and mortality in solid organ transplant populations.

Feasibility of Lung Transplantation From Donation After Circulatory Death Donors Following Portable Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to significantly alleviate the shortage of transplantable lungs. We report our initial experience with the use of portable ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) with the Organ Care System Lung device for evaluation of DCD lungs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of the DCD lung transplantation (LTx) experience at a single institution through the use of a prospective database.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2015, 208 LTx were performed at the University of Alberta, of which 11 were DCD LTx with 7 (64%) that underwent portable EVLP. DCD lungs preserved with portable EVLP had a significantly shorter cold ischemic time (161 ± 44 vs 234 ± 60 minutes, P = .045), lower grade of primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours after LTx (0.4 ± 0.5 vs 2.1 ± 0.7, P = .003), similar mechanical ventilation time (55 ± 44 vs 103 ± 97 hours, P = .281), and hospital length of stay (29 ± 11 vs 33 ± 10 days, P = .610). All patients were alive at 1-year follow-up after LTx with improved functional outcomes and acceptable quality of life compared with before LTx, although there were no intergroup differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In our pilot cohort, portable EVLP was a feasible modality to increase confidence in the use of DCD lungs with validated objective evidence of lung function during EVLP that translates to acceptable clinical outcomes and quality of life after LTx. Further studies are needed to validate these initial findings in a larger cohort.

Intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the possibility of postoperative prolongation improve survival in bilateral lung transplantation

OBJECTIVES

The value of intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in lung transplantation remains controversial. In our department, ECMO has been used routinely for intraoperatively unstable patients for more than 15 years. Recently, we have extended its indication to a preemptive application in almost all cases. In addition, we prolong ECMO into the early postoperative period whenever graft function does not meet certain quality criteria or in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. The objective of this study was to review the results of this strategy.

METHODS

All standard bilateral lung transplantations performed between January 2010 and June 2016 were included in this single-center, retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group I-no ECMO (n = 116), group II-intraoperative ECMO (n = 343), and group III-intraoperative and prolonged postoperative ECMO (n = 123). The impact of different ECMO strategies on primary graft function, short-term outcomes, and patient survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

The use of intraoperative ECMO was associated with improved 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival compared with non-ECMO patients (91% vs 82%, 85% vs 76%, and 80% vs 74%; log-rank P = .041). This effect was still evident after propensity score matching of both cohorts. Despite the high number of complex patients in group III, outcome was excellent with higher survival rates than in the non-ECMO group at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ECMO results in superior survival when compared with transplantation without any extracorporeal support. The concept of prophylactic postoperative ECMO prolongation is associated with excellent outcomes in recipients with pulmonary hypertension and in patients with questionable graft function at the end of implantation.

Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation

Primary graft dysfunction is a form of acute injury after lung transplantation that is associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Multiple mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of primary graft dysfunction, including ischemia reperfusion injury, epithelial cell death, endothelial cell dysfunction, innate immune activation, oxidative stress, and release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of primary graft dysfunction.

Diastolic Dysfunction Increases the Risk of Primary Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplant

RATIONALE

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a significant cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplant and is characterized by severe hypoxemia and infiltrates in the allograft. The pathogenesis of PGD involves ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, subclinical increases in pulmonary venous pressure due to left ventricular diastolic dysfunction may contribute by exacerbating capillary leak.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a higher ratio of early mitral inflow velocity (E) to early diastolic mitral annular velocity (é), indicative of worse left ventricular diastolic function, is associated with a higher risk of PGD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group who underwent bilateral lung transplant at our institution between 2004 and 2014 for interstitial lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or pulmonary arterial hypertension. Transthoracic echocardiograms obtained during evaluation for transplant listing were analyzed for E/é and other measures of diastolic function. PGD was defined as PaO2/FiO2 less than or equal to 200 with allograft infiltrates at 48 or 72 hours after reperfusion. The association between E/é and PGD was assessed with multivariable logistic regression.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After adjustment for recipient age, body mass index, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and pretransplant diagnosis, higher E/é and E/é greater than 8 were associated with an increased risk of PGD (E/é odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.64; P = 0.04; E/é >8 odds ratio, 5.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-20.01; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in left ventricular diastolic function may contribute to the development of PGD. Future trials are needed to determine whether optimization of left ventricular diastolic function reduces the risk of PGD.

Fluid Management in Lung Transplant Patients

Overall, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials examining the correlation between fluid volume delivery and outcomes in postoperative lung transplant patients. However, using thoracic surgery patients as a guide, the evidence suggests that hypervolemia correlates with pulmonary edema and should be avoided in lung transplant patients. However, it is recognized that patients with hemodynamic instability may require volume for attenuation of this situation, but it can likely be mitigated with the use of inotropic medication to maintain adequate perfusion and avoid the development of edema.

Lung transplantation: overall approach regarding its major aspects

Lung transplantation is a well-established treatment for patients with advanced lung disease. The evaluation of a candidate for transplantation is a complex task and involves a multidisciplinary team that follows the patient beyond the postoperative period. Currently, the mean time on the waiting list for lung transplantation in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, is approximately 18 months. For Brazil as a whole, data from the Brazilian Organ Transplant Association show that, in 2014, there were 67 lung transplants and 204 patients on the waiting list for lung transplantation. Lung transplantation is most often indicated in cases of COPD, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, and pulmonary hypertension. This comprehensive review aimed to address the major aspects of lung transplantation: indications, contraindications, evaluation of transplant candidates, evaluation of donor candidates, management of transplant recipients, and major complications. To that end, we based our research on the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines and on the protocols used by our Lung Transplant Group in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.

Primary graft dysfunction: lessons learned about the first 72 h after lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In 2005, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation published a standardized definition of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), facilitating new knowledge on this form of acute lung injury that occurs within 72 h of lung transplantation. PGD continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This article will summarize the current literature on the epidemiology of PGD, pathogenesis, risk factors, and preventive and treatment strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2011, several manuscripts have been published that provide insight into the clinical risk factors and pathogenesis of PGD. In addition, several transplant centers have explored preventive and treatment strategies for PGD, including the use of extracorporeal strategies. More recently, results from several trials assessing the role of extracorporeal lung perfusion may allow for much-needed expansion of the donor pool, without raising PGD rates.

SUMMARY

This article will highlight the current state of the science regarding PGD, focusing on recent advances, and set a framework for future preventive and treatment strategies.

Early donor-specific antibodies in lung transplantation: risk factors and impact on survival

BACKGROUND

The impact of early donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) on patient and graft survival after lung transplantation remains controversial. In this study we analyzed risk factors for DSA that developed before initial hospital discharge after lung transplantation (early DSA) and compared mid-term outcomes in patients with or without DSA.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and August 2013, 546 patients underwent lung transplantation at our institution. One hundred (18%) patients developed early DSA (Group A) and 446 (82%) patients (Group B) did not. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Retransplantation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 6.5, p = 0.03), pre-operative HLA antibodies (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.4, p = 0.003) and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) score Grade 2 or 3 at 48 hours (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.5 to 4.6, p = 0.001) were associated with early DSA development. Overall, 1- and 3-year survival in Group A and B patients was 79 ± 4% vs 88 ± 2% and 57 ± 8% vs 74 ± 3%, respectively (p = 0.019). Eleven Group A (11%) and 32 Group B (7%) patients died before hospital discharge (p = 0.34). Among patients surviving beyond discharge, 1- and 3-year survival in Group A and B patients was 89 ± 4% vs 95 ± 1% and 65 ± 8% vs 80 ± 3% in Group A and B patients, respectively (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis identified early anti-HLA Class II DSA (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p = 0.04) as an independent risk factor for post-discharge mortality but not for in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative HLA antibodies, retransplantation or post-operative PGD increase the risk of developing early DSA, which were independently associated with an increased risk for mortality.

Recipient-related clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the main cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results for PGD risk factors. Herein, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature to identify recipient-related clinical risk factors associated with PGD development.

Method

A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus) for studies published from 1970 to 2013 was performed. Cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies that examined recipient-related risk factors of PGD were included. The odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) were calculated using random-effects models

Result

Thirteen studies involving 10042 recipients met final inclusion criteria. From the pooled analyses, female gender (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.75), African American (OR 1.82, 95%CI 1.36 to 2.45), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.13), sarcoidosis (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.09 to 16.52), primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) (OR 3.73, 95%CI 2.16 to 6.46), elevated BMI (BMI≥25 kg/m²) (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.64), and use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.43 to 3.65) were significantly associated with increased risk of PGD. Age, cystic fibrosis, secondary pulmonary hypertension (SPH), intra-operative inhaled nitric oxide (NO), or lung transplant type (single or bilateral) were not significantly associated with PGD development (all P>0.05). Moreover, a nearly 4 fold increased risk of short-term mortality was observed in patients with PGD (OR 3.95, 95% CI 2.80 to 5.57).

Conclusions

Our analysis identified several recipient related risk factors for development of PGD. The identification of higher-risk recipients and further research into the underlying mechanisms may lead to selective therapies aimed at reducing this reperfusion injury.

Early results in transplantation of initially rejected donor lungs after ex vivo lung perfusion: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES

An increasing number of studies have shown that ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is safe and that rejected donor lungs can be resuscitated and used for lung transplantation (LTx). Early clinical outcomes in patients transplanted with reconditioned lungs at our centre were reviewed and compared with those of contemporary non-EVLP controls.

METHODS

During 18 months starting January 2011, 11 pairs of donor lungs initially deemed unsuitable for transplantation underwent EVLP. Haemodynamic (pulmonary flow, vascular resistance and artery pressure) and respiratory (peak airway pressure and compliance) parameters were analysed during evaluation. Lungs that improved (n = 11) to meet International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria were transplanted and compared with patients transplanted with non-EVLP lungs (n = 47) during the same time period.

RESULTS

Donor lungs were initially rejected due to either inferior PaO2/FiO2 ratio (n = 9), bilateral infiltrate on chest X-ray (n = 1) or ongoing extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 1). The donor lungs improved from a mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 27.9 kPa in the donor to a mean of 59.6 kPa at the end of the EVLP (median improvement 28.4 kPa, range 21.0-50.7 kPa). Two single lungs were deemed unsuitable and not used for LTx. Eleven recipients from the regular waiting list underwent either single (n = 3) LTx or double (n = 8) LTx with EVLP-treated lungs. The median time to extubation (12 (range, 3-912) vs 6 (range, 2-1296) h) and median intensive care unit (ICU) stay (152 (range, 40-625) vs 48 (range, 22-1632) h) were longer in the EVLP group (P = 0.05 and P = 0.01, respectively). There were no differences in length of hospital stay (median 28 (range 25-93) vs 28 (18-209), P = 0.21). Two patients in the EVLP group and 6 in the control group had primary graft dysfunction >Grade 1 at 72 h postoperatively. Three patients in the control group died before discharge. All recipients of EVLP lungs were discharged alive from hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of EVLP seems safe and indicates that lungs otherwise refused for LTx can be recovered and subsequently used for transplantation, although time to extubation and ICU stay were longer for the EVLP group.