Effect of Calcifications on Shear-Wave Elastography in Evaluating Breast Lesions

The Diagnostic Role of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging in the Evaluation of Suspicious Microcalcifications

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) and shear wave elastography (SWE) in the prediction of malignancy and invasiveness of isolated microcalcifications (MC) that can be visualized by ultrasonography (US).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-seven women with MC, who were considered suspicious on mammography were evaluated. Only those lesions that could be visualized by US and presented as non-mass lesion were included. They were evaluated by B-mode US, SMI, and SWE before US-guided core-needle biopsy. B-mode US, SMI (vascular index (SMIvi)), and SWE (E-mean, E-ratio) findings were compared with histopathologic features.

RESULTS

Pathology confirmed 45 malignant (21 invasive and 24 in situ carcinomas) and 22 benign lesions. There was a statistically significant difference between malignant and benign groups in terms of size (P = .015), distortion (P = .028), cystic component (P < .001), E-mean (P < .001), E-ratio (P < .001), and SMIvi (P = .006). For differentiation of invasiveness E-mean (P = .002), E-ratio (P = .002), and SMIvi (P = .030) were statistically significant. According to ROC analysis E-mean (cut-off point at 38 kPa) was the most sensitive (78%) and the most specific (95%) value among four numeric parameters (size, SMI, E-mean, and E-ratio) with AUC = 0.895, PPV = 97%, and NPV = 68% in detecting malignancy. In the evaluation of invasiveness, the most sensitive (71.4%) method was SMI (cut-off point at 3.4) and the most specific (72%) method was E-mean (cut-off point at 91.5 kPa).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that adding SWE and SMI to the sonographic evaluation of MC would be an advantage for US-guided biopsy. Including suspicious areas according to SMI and SWE in the sampling area can help target the invasive part of the lesion and avoid underestimation of core biopsy.

Clinical Significance of Ultrasound Elastography and Fibrotic Focus and Their Association in Breast Cancer

(1) Background: Ultrasound (US) elastography is an imaging technology that reveals tissue stiffness. This study aimed to investigate whether fibrotic focus (FF) affects elastographic findings in breast cancer, and to evaluate the clinical significance of US elastography and FF in breast cancer. (2) Methods: In this study, 151 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery were included. Strain elastography was performed and an elasticity scoring system was used to assess the findings. The elasticity scores were classified as negative, equivocal, or positive. FF was evaluated in the surgical specimens. Medical records were reviewed for all patients. (3) Results: Elastographic findings were equivocal in 30 patients (19.9%) and positive in 121 patients (80.1%). FF was present in 68 patients (46.9%). There was no correlation between elastographic findings and FF. Older age, larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and higher tumor stage were associated with positive elastographic results. FF showed a positive correlation with age, postmenopausal status, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis, tumor stage, and intratumoral and peritumoral inflammation. (4) Conclusions: Our study showed that positive elastographic results and FF were associated with poor prognostic factors for breast cancer. FF did not affect the elastographic findings of this study.

Characterization of Suspicious Microcalcifications on Mammography Using 2D Shear-Wave Elastography

Our aim was to investigate the correlations between the findings of two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE) and the histopathologic results of microcalcifications (MCs) visualized using ultrasonography (USG). Fifty people with suspicious MCs without accompanying mass were evaluated. They underwent USG and 2D-SWE before USG-guided tru-cut biopsy. SWE values and histopathologic features were compared statistically. The variables between groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed and cut-off values determined to discriminate malignancy, invasiveness and high grade. Pathology confirmed 27 malignant lesions (18 invasive ductal carcinomas, one invasive lobular and eight ductal carcinomas in situ) and 23 benign ones. There was a statistically significant difference between the SWE values of malignant and benign MCs (p < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of SWE for malignancy, invasiveness and high grade were as follows, repectively: sensitivity (93%, 83%, 88%), specificity (91%, 88%, 53%), positive predictive value (93%, 94%, 44%), negative predictive value (91%, 70%, 90%) and area under the curve (0.952, 0.885, 0.776). Cut-off values were determined as 57 kPa for malignancy, 124 kPa for invasiveness and 124.5 kPa for high grade. In conclusion, SWE is a useful method in clinical practice for characterizing MCs that can be visualized with USG.