Racial disparity in outcomes of a clinical trial population with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Survival Outcomes of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Receiving Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have significantly improved survival outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, ethnic and racial minorities are often underrepresented in ICI clinical trials, leading to limited knowledge about ICI-specific survival outcomes for mRCC across different racial and ethnic groups. We investigated the impact of race and ethnicity on the ICI-specific survival outcomes of mRCC.

MATERIALS

We used The National Cancer Database (NCDB) to retrieve the data of 4858 mRCC patients diagnosed from 2014 to 2019 and receiving ICI-based regimens. We then compared survival outcomes using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-rank test. We analyzed the data using univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity index, treatment centers, and grade.

RESULTS

White and Asian patients had significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) than African American (AA) patients (23.2 [95% CI 21.6, 24.7; P = .001] and 22.2 [95% CI 16.4, 55.1; P = .047] vs. 14.8 [95% CI 11.9, 19.2] months, respectively). After adjustment, White patients had significantly longer median OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.71 [95% CI 0.58, 0.84]; P = .001). There was no significant difference in the mOS between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients (P = .39).

CONCLUSION

Black race is an independent predictor of ICI-related survival in mRCC patients, independent of sociodemographics, clinicopathological, and treatment-related factors. Future research is required to understand the underlying reasons for these disparities, including potential genetic or biological differences and social and environmental factors.

Racial Disparities in MiT Family Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma

Racial disparities have been documented in the biology and outcome of certain renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) among Black patients. However, little is known about racial differences in MiT family translocation RCC (TRCC). To investigate this issue, we performed a case-control study using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Chinese OrigiMed2020 cohort. A total of 676 patients with RCC (14 Asian, 113 Black, and 525 White) were identified in TCGA, and TRCC was defined as RCC with TFE3/TFEB translocation or TFEB amplification, leading to 21 patients with TRCC (2 Asian, 8 Black, 10 White, and 1 unknown). Asian (2 of 14 [14.3%] vs 10 of 525 [1.9%]; P = .036) and Black (8 of 113 [7.1%] vs 1.9%; P = .007) patients with RCC showed significantly higher prevalence of TRCC compared with White patients with RCC. The overall mortality rate of TRCC was slightly higher in Asian and Black patients compared with White patients (HR: 6.05, P = .069). OrigiMed2020 Chinese patients with RCC had a significantly higher proportion of TRCC with TFE3 fusions than TCGA White patients with RCC (13 of 250 [5.2%] vs 7 of 525 [1.3%]; P = .003). Black patients with TRCC were more likely to exhibit the proliferative subtype than White patients (6 of 8 [75%] vs 2 of 9 [22.2%]; P = .057) for those who had RNA-seq profiles. We present evidence of higher prevalence of TRCC in Asian and Black patients with RCC compared with White patients and show that these tumors in Asian and Black patients have distinct transcriptional signatures and are associated with poor outcomes.

Socioeconomic determinants of racial disparities in survival outcomes among patients with renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Racially driven outcomes in cancer are challenging to study. Studies evaluating the impact of race in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) outcomes are inconsistent and unable to disentangle socioeconomic disparities from inherent biological differences. We therefore seek to investigate socioeconomic determinants of racial disparities with respect to overall survival (OS) when comparing Black and White patients with RCC.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with RCC between 2004 and 2017 with complete clinicodemographic data. Patients were examined across various stages (all, cT1aN0M0, and cM1) and subtypes (all, clear cell, or papillary). We performed Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for socioeconomic and disease factors.

RESULTS

There were 386,589 patients with RCC, of whom 46,507 (12.0%) were Black. Black patients were generally younger, had more comorbid conditions, less likely to be insured, in a lower income quartile, had lower rates of high school completion, were more likely to have papillary RCC histology, and more likely to be diagnosed at a lower stage of RCC than their white counterparts. By stage, Black patients demonstrated a 16% (any stage), 22.5% (small renal mass [SRM]), and 15% (metastatic) higher risk of mortality than White patients. Survival differences were also evident in histology-specific subanalyses. Socioeconomic factors played a larger role in predicting OS among patients with SRMs than in patients with metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients with RCC demonstrate worse survival outcomes compared to White patients across all stages. Socioeconomic disparities between races play a significant role in influencing survival in RCC.

Healthcare Disparities in Interventional Radiology

Racial, ethnic, and sex-based healthcare disparities have been documented for the past several decades. Nonetheless, disparities remain firmly entrenched in our care delivery systems, with multiple contributing factors, including patient interactions with care providers, systemic barriers to access, and socioeconomic determinants of health. Interventional radiology is also subject to these drivers of health inequity. In this review, documented disparities for the most common conditions being addressed by interventional radiologists are summarized; their magnitude is quantified where relevant, and underlying drivers are identified. Specific examples are provided to illustrate how medical, cultural, and socioeconomic factors interact to produce unequal outcomes. By outlining known disparities and common contributors, this review aims to motivate future efforts to mitigate them.

Disparities in Clinical Care and Research in Renal Cell Carcinoma

Disparities in cancer screening, prevention, therapy, clinical outcomes, and research are increasingly recognized and pervade all malignancies. In response, several cancer research and clinical care organizations have issued policy statements to acknowledge and address barriers to achieving health equity in cancer care. The increasingly specialized nature of oncology warrants a disease-focused appraisal of existing disparities and potential solutions. Although clear improvements in clinical outcomes have been recently observed for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), these improvements have not been equally shared across diverse populations. This review describes existing RCC cancer disparities and their potential contributing factors and discusses opportunities to improve health equity in clinical research for all patients with RCC.

Disparities in Cancer Specific and Overall Survival Outcomes in African Americans With Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis From the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer (INMARC)

OBJECTIVE

To investigate association of African-American race and survival in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We queried the International Marker Consortium for Renal Cancer database for patients who underwent partial or radical (RN) nephrectomy. The cohort was divided into African American (AA) and non-African American (NAA) patients. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome was cancer-specific mortality. Multivariable Analysis and Kaplan-Meier Analysis were used to elucidate predictive factors and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Three thousand eight hundred and ninety-three patients were analyzed (AA, n = 564/NAA, n = 3329). AA had greater Stage I (73.8% vs 63.9%, P <.001) and papillary RCC (29.8% vs 8.5%, P <.001). Multivariable Analysis revealed increasing age (HR = 1.03, P <.001), AA (HR = 1.24, P = .027), higher stage (HR = 1.30-3.19, P <.001), RN (HR = 2.45, P <.001), clear cell (HR = 1.23, P <.001), positive margin (HR = 1.34, P .004), and high-grade (HR = 1.58, P <.001) to be associated with worsened all-cause mortality. Increasing age (HR = 1.02, P <.001), AA (HR = 1.48, P = .025), RN (HR = 2.98, P <.001), high-grade (HR = 3.11, P <.001), and higher stage (HR = 3.03-13.2, P <.001) were predictive for cancer-specific mortality. Kaplan-Meier Analysis revealed worsened 5-year overall survival for AA in stage I (80% vs 88%, P = .001), stage III (26% vs 70%, P = .001), and stage IV (23% vs 44%, P = .009). Five-year cancer-specific survival was worse for AA in stage III (36% vs 81%, P <.001) and stage IV (30% vs 49%, P = .007).

CONCLUSION

Despite presenting with more indolent histology and lower stage, African-Americans were at greater risk for diminished survival, faring worse in overall survival for all stages and cancer-specific survival in for stage III/IV RCC. Further investigation into factors associated with these disparities is warranted.

Outcomes in Black and White Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Insights From Two Large Cohorts

PURPOSE

To investigate whether black race is an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective 2-cohort (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium [IMDC] and trial-database) study of patients with mRCC treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Unmatched (UM) and matched (M) analyses accounting for imbalances in region, year of treatment, age, and sex between races were performed. Cox models adjusting for histology, number of metastatic sites, nephrectomy, and IMDC risk compared time to treatment failure (TTF; IMDC cohort), progression-free survival (PFS; trial-database cohort), and OS.

RESULTS

The IMDC cohort included 73 black versus 3,381 (UM) and 1,236 (M) white patients. The trial-database cohort included 21 black versus 1,040 (UM) and 431 (M) white patients. Median OS for black versus white patients was 18.5 versus 25.8 months in the IMDC group and 21.0 versus 25.6 months in the trial-database group. Differences in OS were not significant in multivariable analysis in the IMDC group (hazard ratio [HR]_M, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.5; HR_UM, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.4) and trial-database (HR_M, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.7; HR_UM, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.6) cohorts. TTF for black patients was shorter in the UM IMDC cohort (HR_UM, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8; P = .003), but not in the M analysis. PFS was shorter for black patients in both analyses in the trial-database cohort (HR_M, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.9; P = .002; HR_UM, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.9; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Black patients had more IMDC risk factors and worse outcomes with TKIs versus white patients. Race was not an independent predictor of OS. Strategies to understand biologic determinants of outcomes for minority patients are needed to optimize care.

Racial Comparison of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses at a Large Volume Tertiary Center

Introduction and Objective: African American (AA) race has been identified to have a higher incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and worse renal cancer survival compared with Caucasian Americans (CA), irrespective of tumor size, pathologic type, and surgical procedure. We aimed to compare the outcomes between CA and AA patients undergoing minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (PN) at our high-volume center. Materials and Methods: We queried our PN data repository from 2007 to 2017. We identified 981 cases of PN (robotic n = 943 and laparoscopic n = 38), of which there were 852 CA and 129 AA patients. We compared age, sex, body mass index (BMI), operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), nephrometry score, tumor size, pre- and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), length of stay, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), tumor characteristics, and 30-day complication rate. We then estimated the overall survival and disease-specific survival. Results: Age, BMI, operative time, EBL, nephrometry score, tumor size, CCI, length of stay, and sex were not statistically different. The mean preoperative eGFR was higher in the AA cohort (91.4 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 86.1 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.007); however, at 1 year, there was no mean difference (76.8 mL/min/1.73 m² vs 74.5 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.428). There was a higher percentage of Fuhrman Grade 3/4 in the AA cohort (33.3% vs 22.5%, p = 0.044). The AA cohort had a 2.66 × higher incidence of papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (34.9% vs 13.1%, p < 0.001) and unclassified RCC (3.9% vs 0.4%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in tumor stage (p = 0.260) or incidence of benign histology (15.3% vs 11.6%, p = 0.278). There were no differences in 30-day complications (p = 0.330). The median follow-up was 43.2 months. By using Kaplan-Meier curves, there was no observed difference in overall survival (p = 0.752) or disease-free survival (p = 0.403). Conclusions: Our cohort of AA and CA patients with intermediate follow-up showed no worse outcomes for CKD or survival when undergoing laparoscopic or robotic PN. For low-stage renal cancer, there was no difference in overall survival and disease-free survival at a median follow-up of 43.2 months among AA patients, despite having higher grade tumors and a higher percentage of unclassified RCC. Our cohort of AA patients did have a higher incidence of papillary RCC. The equivalent overall survival and disease-free survival could be due to the earlier discovery of lower stage renal masses incidentally identified on imaging studies performed equally for other reasons in both AA and CA patients.

Does race impact functional outcomes in patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy?

Background

The role of race on functional outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is still a matter of debate. We aimed to evaluate the clinical and pathologic characteristics of African American (AA) and Caucasian patients who underwent RPN and analyzed the association between race and functional outcomes.

Methods

Data was obtained from a multi-institutional database of patients who underwent RPN in 6 institutions in the USA. We identified 999 patients with complete clinical data. Sixty-three patients (6.3%) were AA, and each patient was matched (1:3) to Caucasian patients by age at surgery, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and renal score. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI). Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable semiparametric Cox regression analyses were performed to assess prevalence and predictors of significant eGFR reduction during follow-up.

Results

Overall, 252 patients were included. AA were more likely to have hypertension (58.7% vs. 35.4%, P=0.001), even after 1:3 match. Overall 42 patients (16.7%) developed AKI after surgery and 35 patients (13.9%) developed significant eGFR reduction between 3 and 15 months after RAPN. On multivariate analysis, AA race did not emerge as a significant factor for predicting AKI (OR 1.10, P=0.8). On Cox multivariable analysis, only AKI was found to be associated with significant eGFR reduction between 3 and 15 months after RAPN (HR 2.49, P=0.019).

Conclusions

Although African American patients were more likely to have hypertension, renal function outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomies were not significantly different when stratified by race. However, future studies with larger cohorts are necessary to validate these findings.

Racial and ethnic differences in survival in contemporary metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients, according to alternative treatment modalities

PURPOSE

To test the association between African-American race and overall mortality (OM) rates in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

METHODS

Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (2006-2015), we identified patients with clear cell (ccmRCC) and non-clear cell mRCC (non-ccmRCC). African-Americans, Caucasians, and Hispanics were identified. Stratification was made according to histology and treatments: (1) no treatment, (2) systemic therapy (ST), (3) cytoreductive nephrectomy (CNT), (4) CNT + ST. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

Of ccmRCC patients, 410 (7%), 4353 (75%), and 1005 (17%) were African-American, Caucasian, and Hispanic, respectively. Of non-ccmRCC patients, 183 (25%), 479 (65%), and 77 (10%) were African-American, Caucasian, and Hispanic, respectively. In ccmRCC, African-Americans were associated with higher OM rates (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05-1.37). Conversely, in non-ccmRCC, African-Americans were associated with lower OM rates (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.97).

CONCLUSION

African-American race is associated with prolonged survival in non-ccmRCC, but it is also associated with lower survival rates in ccmRCC. The exception to these observations consisted of patients treated with combination of CNT + ST for either ccmRCC or non-ccmRCC.

Predictors of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy for Metastatic Kidney Cancer in SEER and Metropolitan Detroit Databases

Patients without cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) are inadequately represented in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) clinical trials. The characteristics that impact the decision of CN were explored in the SEER database. Data on primary, regional, or distant (metastatic) stage kidney cancer over the period 2000–2013 were extracted from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER-18) database. A sub-analysis of Metropolitan Detroit cases, to evaluate the influence of comorbidities, was conducted. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratios, and Cox model was used to calculate hazard ratios; 37% of 21,052 metastatic RCC cases had CN performed. CN demonstrated significant survival advantage (HR = 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30–0.33). Comorbidity data were available on 76% of distant RCC cases from the Detroit SEER database. Neither hypertension, diabetes mellitus nor the number of comorbidities (0, 1 or 2) had a statistically significant impact on the likelihood of CN. Majority of patients (63%) with distant-stage RCC do not undergo CN and have a median overall survival (OS) of 3 months as compared to a median OS of 18 months for patients who have undergone CN. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics make a significant impact on the incidence of CN. The impact of comorbidities (number and type) was modest and not statistically significant. The optimal management of patients with synchronous primary and metastatic RCC needs to be prospectively evaluated in the setting of contemporary systemic therapy.

Emerging genomic biomarkers for improving kidney, prostate, and bladder cancer health disparities outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in genomic and genetic technologies have facilitated better health outcomes for urologic cancer patients. Genomic and genetic heterogeneity may contribute to differences in tumor biology and urologic cancer burden across various populations.

OBJECTIVE

To examine how emerging genomic and genetic biomarkers, self-reported race, and ancestry-informative markers are associated with kidney, prostate, and bladder cancer outcomes.

RESULTS

Genomic and genetic alterations found in African American kidney cancer patients included distinct somatic mutations, somatic copy number alterations, chromosomal instability, germ-line risk alleles, and germ-line genetic variants. These changes correlated with improved risk prediction, prognosis, and survival; and a predicted decrease in response to targeted therapies. SNP risk alleles and ancestry-informative markers were associated with improved risk prediction in prostate cancer patients of both African and European descent. AKT activation suggest differential response to AKT-targeted therapies in African American, Asian American, and Tunisian bladder cancer patients. Both self-reported race and genetic ancestry predicted urologic cancer risk prediction.

CONCLUSION

Precision medicine approaches that integrate population-specific genomic and genetic information with other known urologic cancer-specific characteristics can improve outcomes and be leveraged to reduce cancer health disparities. Further investigations are necessary to identify novel genomic biomarkers with clinical utility.

Racial Disparities in Histology and Short-Term Renal Functional Outcomes Following Robotic Nephron-Sparing Surgery

PURPOSE

To identify variations in renal function and histology between Caucasian Americans (CA) and African Americans (AA) undergoing robotic nephron-sparing surgery (NSS).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent NSS. Multivariate analysis identified factors affecting postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Histology was re-reviewed by pathology to confirm papillary type.

RESULTS

A total of 331 patients underwent NSS: CA (n = 212), AA (n = 105), Hispanic (n = 10), and other (n = 4). AA average age (60.1 years) was lower than CA (62.3 years) (P < .001), with a higher proportion of AA women (46%) than CA (37%) (P = .021). AA had a higher incidence of diabetes (58.2%) and hypertension (93.9%). Preoperative average eGFR was similar: 70.35 mL/min for AA versus 69.06 mL/min for CA. Average postoperative eGFR was 50.59 mL/min for AA and 57.85 mL/min for CA. Postoperative creatinine increased more in AA (0.44 mg/dL) versus CA (0.33 mg/dL) (P < .001) even when stratified by pathological stage. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was the most common histology with AA (45%) and CA (60%). A greater than 2-fold higher incidence of papillary RCC was observed in AA (31%) versus CA (13%). AA exhibited a greater proportion of high-grade or type 2 papillary RCC (40% and 30%) versus CA (25% and 13%).

CONCLUSIONS

AA patients were treated at a younger age, with a larger proportion of women. Postoperatively, AA experienced a greater increase in serum creatinine. Final histology demonstrated greater papillary RCC incidence in AA and increased likelihood for type 2 papillary RCC, a more aggressive histology.

Racial disparities in survival among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in the targeted therapy era

BACKGROUND

Historically, African American (AA) patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have had inferior survival compared with Caucasian patients. Recent studies suggest that the survival disparity between races may be worsening since the advent of targeted therapies for RCC. In this study, survival rates among AA and Caucasian patients with advanced RCC are examined over time to determine whether a disparity in survival persists in the targeted therapy era.

METHODS

The authors identified patients with stage IV RCC in the National Cancer Data Base and compared survival between AA and Caucasian patients during the periods before (1998-2004) and after (2006-2011) the advent of targeted therapy.

RESULTS

In total, 48,846 patients were identified, and 10% were AA. Three-year survival among both AA and Caucasian patients improved between the 2 periods (P < .01 for both), with no interaction observed between race and improved survival over time (P = .15). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death among AAs compared with Caucasians was 1.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.19) in the post-targeted therapy era, which was unchanged from the pretargeted therapy era (adjusted HR, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.15). The adjusted HR was similar when the analysis was restricted to those who received systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Both AA and Caucasian patients with advanced RCC have had a significant improvement in survival since the advent of targeted therapy. However, AA patients maintain a survival disadvantage compared with Caucasians independent of treatment received, potentially related to unmeasured comorbidities, disease burden, or tumor biology. Cancer 2016;122:2988-2995. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Intrinsic Genomic Differences Between African American and White Patients With Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Importance

There are well-documented racial disparities in outcomes for African American patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Despite a dramatic improvement in overall survival in white patients since the advent of targeted therapy, survival for African Americans with advanced ccRCC has not changed. There is little known about potential racial differences in tumor biology of ccRCC.

Objective

To determine if there are racial differences in the somatic mutation rate and gene expression of ccRCC tumors from white and African American patients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Overall, 438 patients with ccRCC were identified through The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) clear cell kidney (KIRC) dataset (419 white and 19 African American patients). The GSE25540 dataset containing 135 patients (125 white and 10 African American patients) was used for validation. Tumor samples were collected from numerous cancer centers and were examined for racial differences in somatic mutation rates and RNA expression. Racial differences in somatic mutation rates and RNA expression were examined.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The comparison of somatic mutation rates and differences in RNA expression in white and African American patients with ccRCC.

Results

Overall, 419 ccRCC tumor data sets from non-Hispanic white patients and 19 from non-Hispanic African American patients were identified through the publically available TCGA KIRC data set, and a validation set of 125 white and 10 African American ccRCC patient tumors was identified from the publicly available GSE25540 data set. African American patients were significantly less likely than white patients to have VHL mutations (2 of 12 [17%] vs 175 of 351 [50%], respectively; P = .04) and were enriched in the ccB molecular subtype (79% in African American vs 45% in white patients ; P = .005), a molecular subtype that carries a worse prognosis. It was found that RNA expression analysis revealed relative down-regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-associated pathways in African American patients compared with white patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

African American patients have less frequent VHL inactivation, are enriched in the ccB molecular subtype, and have decreased up-regulation of HIF-associated gene signatures than white patients. These genomic differences would predict decreased responsiveness to VEGF-targeted therapy and are a biologically plausible contributing factor to the worse survival of African American patients with ccRCC, even in the targeted therapy era.

Survival among Black and White patients with renal cell carcinoma in an equal-access health care system

PURPOSE

Unequal access to health care may be a reason for shorter survival among Black patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) than among their White counterparts. No studies have investigated survival disparity among RCC patients in an equal-access health care delivery system. This study aimed to examine racial differences in survival among clear cell RCC patients in the Department of Defense's (DoD) Military Health System (MHS), which provides equal access to care to all persons.

METHODS

The study used the DoD's Automated Central Tumor Registry to identify 2056 White patients and 370 Black patients diagnosed with clear cell RCC between 1988 and 2004. The subjects were followed through 2007 with a median follow-up time of 4.8 years. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared and a Cox model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) associated with survival by race.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 1,027 White and 158 Black patients died. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that Black patients had more favorable overall survival than did White patients (log rank p = 0.031). After adjustment for demographic, tumor, and treatment variables, the Cox model showed no statistically significant racial difference overall (adjusted HR 1.07, 95 % CI 0.90-1.28) or stratified by age, sex or tumor stage. However, among patients who did not undergo surgery, Black patients had poorer survival than White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of racial difference in survival among RCC patients in the MHS may be related to equal access to health care. Improved access could reduce the survival disparity among RCC patients in the general population.

The effect of targeted therapy on overall survival in advanced renal cancer: a study of the national surveillance epidemiology and end results registry database

INTRODUCTION

With the advent and availability of targeted therapy, the treatment of advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) underwent a drastic change in 2005. The effect of this change on clinical outcome within the population has not been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS), before, and after availability of targeted therapy, for advanced RCC cases in the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All advanced (regional and distant stage) RCC cases diagnosed within the 2000 to 2008 time periods were included. Because SEER does not report the exact therapy, and because targeted therapy was initially approved in 2005, we evaluated and compared the OS outcomes of advanced RCC cases diagnosed between the years 2000 and 2003 (before targeted therapy era) with that of those diagnosed between 2005 and 2008 (targeted therapy era).

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in OS for advanced RCC patients treated in the targeted therapy era (n = 12,330) compared with those treated in the era before targeted therapy (n =11,565) (median OS 20 months vs. 15 months, P = .0006). Multivariate analysis revealed that in the time period before targeted therapy, age older than 65 years, black race, and lack of nephrectomy were predictors of a shorter OS.

CONCLUSION

In univariate and multivariate analysis, targeted therapy demonstrated improvement in OS. Increasing access to targeted therapies is likely to improve outcomes in advanced RCC.

Disease-specific survival in de novo metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the cytokine and targeted therapy era

Background

Recent phase III studies of targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have generated median survival estimates that far exceed those observed during the cytokine era. However, substantial population-based data does not exist to confirm this trend. We sought to determine whether survival has improved for patients with mRCC diagnosed in the era of targeted therapies, as compared to the era of immunotherapy.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry was used to identify patients aged 18 and older diagnosed stage IV RCC between 1992 and 2009. Patients had documented clear cell, papillary or chromophobe histology. The Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare disease-specific survival (DSS) for patients diagnosed from 1992–2004 (i.e., the cytokine era) and 2005–2009 (i.e., the targeted therapy era). Univariate and multivariate analyses of relevant clinicopathologic characteristics were also performed.

Results

Of 5,176 patients identified using the above characteristics, 2,392 patients were diagnosed from 1992–2004 and 2,784 from 2005–2009. Median DSS was improved in those patients diagnosed from 2005–2009 (16 months vs 13 months; P<0.0001). A similar temporal trend towards improving survival was noted in patients with clear cell (P = 0.0006), but not in patients with non-clear cell disease (P = 0.32). Notable findings on multivariate analysis include an association between shorter DSS and the following characteristics: (1) diagnosis from 1992–2004, (2) advanced age (80+), and (3) absence of cytoreductive nephrectomy.

Conclusions

These data reflect progress in the management of mRCC, specifically in the era of targeted therapies. Notably, it was inferred that certain treatment strategies were employed during pre-specified time periods, representing a major caveat of the current analysis. Further studies related to the influence of age and race/ethnicity are warranted, as are studies exploring the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy and novel treatments for non-clear cell disease.

Racial disparity in renal cell carcinoma patient survival according to demographic and clinical characteristics

BACKGROUND

Patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who are black tend to have poorer prognosis than similar patients who are white. This study examined whether the racial disparity in RCC patient survival varies by demographic and clinical characteristics.

METHODS

Nearly 40,000 patients (4359 black and 34,991 white) diagnosed with invasive RCC from 1992 to 2007 were identified from 12 registries in the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, covering approximately 14% of the US population. Relative survival rates through 2008 were computed using the actuarial method.

RESULTS

Proportionally more blacks than whites were diagnosed with RCC under age 50 and with localized cancer. Overall, the 5-year relative survival rates were 72.6% (95% confidence interval 72.0%-73.2%) for white and 68.0% (66.2%-69.8%) for black patients. Survival was higher among women than men and among younger than older patients. Survival decreased with advancing tumor stage and, within each stage, decreased with increasing tumor size. Patients with clear cell RCC, a more common form among whites, had poorer prognosis than patients with papillary or chromophobe subtypes, which are more common among blacks. Survival for patients who received no surgical treatment (10.5% of white patients and 14.5% of black patients) was substantially lower than for patients treated with nephrectomy, with similar survival among whites and blacks. In all other demographic and clinical subgroups of patients, whites consistently had a survival advantage over blacks.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RCC who are white consistently have a survival advantage over those RCC patients who are black, regardless of age, sex, tumor stage or size, histological subtype, or surgical treatment.

The role of socioeconomic status in renal cell carcinoma

Gender, race, income level, and socioeconomic status (SES) are factors in the decision to diagnose and treat patients with localized and advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These variables affect both health care delivery at the provider level as well as health care receipt and decision-making at the patient level. The purpose of this article is to review current literature regarding the role of socioeconomic status and patient demographics on the risk of developing, diagnosing, and treating RCC. The article will also address RCC-related treatment costs and reimbursements.

Rate of renal cell carcinoma subtypes in different races

PURPOSE

We sought to identify racial differences among histological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) between black and non-black patients in an equal-access health care system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We established a multi-institutional, prospective database of patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy between January 1, 2000 and Sept 31, 2009. For the purposes of this study, data captured included age at diagnosis, race, tumor size, presence of lymphovascular invasion, presence of capsular invasion, margin status, and tumor histology.

RESULTS

204 kidney tumors were identified (Table-1). Of these, 117 (57.4%) were in black patients and 87 (42.6%) were in non-black patients. Age at surgery ranged from 37 to 87 with a median of 62. Tumor size ranged from 1.0 to 22.0 cm with a median of 5.0 cm. Overall, tumors were composed of clear cell RCC in 97 cases (47.5%), papillary RCC in 65 cases (31.9%), chromophobe RCC in 13 cases (6.4%), collecting duct/medullary RCC in 2 cases (1.0%), RCC with multiple histological subtypes in 8 cases (3.9%), malignant tumors of other origin in 6 cases (2.9%), and benign histology in 13 cases (6.4%). Among black patients, papillary RCC was seen in 56 cases (47.9%), compared to 9 cases (10.3%) among non-black patients (p < 0.001) (Table-2). Clear cell RCC was present in 38 (32.5%) of black patients and in 59 (67.8%) of non-blacks (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, papillary RCC had a much higher occurrence among black patients compared to non-black patients. This is the first study to document such a great racial disparity among RCC subtypes.

Medical advances and racial/ethnic disparities in cancer survival

BACKGROUND

Although advances in early detection and treatment of cancer improve overall population survival, these advances may not benefit all population groups equally and may heighten racial/ethnic differences in survival.

METHODS

We identified cancer cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program, who were ages > or = 20 years and diagnosed with one invasive cancer in 1995 to 1999 (n = 580,225). We used 5-year relative survival rates to measure the degree to which mortality from each cancer is amenable to medical interventions (amenability index). We used Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate survival differences between each racial/ethnic minority group relative to Whites, by the overall amenability index, and three levels of amenability (nonamenable, partly amenable, and mostly amenable cancers, corresponding to cancers with 5-year relative survival rate < 40%, 40-69%, and > or = 70%, respectively), adjusting for gender, age, disease stage, and county-level poverty concentration.

RESULTS

As amenability increased, racial/ethnic differences in cancer survival increased for African Americans, American Indians/Native Alaskans, and Hispanics relative to Whites. For example, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for African Americans versus Whites from nonamenable, partly amenable, and mostly amenable cancers were 1.05 (1.03-1.07), 1.38 (1.34-1.41), and 1.41 (1.37-1.46), respectively. Asians/Pacific Islanders had similar or longer survival relative to Whites across amenability levels; however, several subgroups experienced increasingly poorer survival with increasing amenability.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survival disparities for most racial/ethnic minority populations widen as cancers become more amenable to medical interventions. Efforts in developing cancer control measures must be coupled with specific strategies for reducing the expected disparities.

Epidemiology, clinical staging, and presentation of renal cell carcinoma

The increasing incidence of renal cell carcinoma over the past 2 decades can be partly explained by the expanding use of abdominal imaging. As a result, the most incident renal cancers today are small, localized, and asymptomatic. However, the well-documented rise in all stages of RCC calls into question the nature of these asymptomatic lesions. The expected "screening effect" of detecting RCC when it is small and localized, with subsequent decreases in disease-specific mortality, has not been observed. Disease-specific mortality is actually rising, especially in African American patients. Effective interventions aimed at reducing obesity, hypertension, and smoking may help in reducing the incidence of RCC in the future.

Disparities in the treatment of patients with IL-2 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is rising. To date, interleukin-2 (IL-2) is the only treatment offering a complete response rate for mRCC. We wish to test the hypothesis that the combination of restricted availability and expense associated with IL-2 administration results in differential access to the medication based on race and sex, despite similar clinical indications for its use.

METHODS

We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and the Centers for Medicare Services (CMS) to clinically characterize subjects with mRCC diagnosed from 1992 through 2002. We linked these subjects to claims identified in the CMS databases. We then assigned subjects to cohorts receiving radical nephrectomy, IL-2, both, or neither. A logistic model was created to identify factors that had significant independent effects on the receipt of IL-2.

RESULTS

Three thousand seven hundred thirty individuals were identified with mRCC. After controlling for other variables, female subjects were less likely to receive IL-2 (O.R. 0.80). African American subjects were also less likely to receive IL-2 (O.R 0.55). Married individuals were much more likely to receive IL-2 (O.R 1.9).

CONCLUSIONS

African Americans and women were much less likely to be treated with IL-2 after controlling for relevant clinical variables. These data document that the only therapy offering a complete response to patients with mRCC is less frequently given to those who are African American or female. It is possible that the racial and gender-based disparities in treatment with IL-2 will be replicated with newer, expensive treatment options for mRCC. Further prospective investigation into mitigating barriers to receipt of effective care for mRCC is urgently needed.

Cytoreductive partial nephrectomy does not undermine cancer control in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study

OBJECTIVES

We examined the population-based rates of cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC) treated with either partial (PN) or radical cytoreductive nephrectomy (RN).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with MRCC and treated with either PN or RN were identified within nine SEER cancer registries. Matched and unmatched Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, as well as multivariable Cox regression models compared the effect of RN (n = 1997, 97.8%) vs. PN (n = 46, 2.2%) on cancer-specific survival (CSS). Covariates consisted of age, gender, community type (rural vs urban), race, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry, tumor size and year of diagnosis.

RESULTS

In multivariable unmatched Cox regression analyses, no statistically significantly difference was found in CSS between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40, P = .16). Similarly, no difference in CSS was found in the matched analyses (HR 1.35, log rank P = .34).

CONCLUSION

Cytoreductive PN does not appear to undermine survival in patients with MRCC.

Patients' Perceptions of Physician-Patient Discussions and Adverse Events with Cancer Therapy

Objectives

Patients with cancer who are treated with chemotherapy report adverse events during their treatment, which can affect their quality of life and increase the likelihood that their treatment will not be completed. In this study, patients' perceptions of the physician-patient relationship and communication about cancer-related issues, particularly adverse events were examined.

Methods

We surveyed 508 patients with cancer concerning the occurrence of adverse events and their relationship and communication with their physicians regarding cancer, treatment, and adverse events.

Results

Most individuals surveyed (>90%) discussed diagnosis, treatment plan, goals, and schedule, and potential adverse events with their physicians before initiating chemotherapy; approximately 75% of these individuals understood these topics completely or very well. Physician-patient discussions of adverse events were common, with tiredness, nausea and vomiting, and loss of appetite discussed prior to chemotherapy in over 80% of communications. These events were also the most often experienced (ranging in 95% to 64% of the respondents) along with low white blood cell counts (WBCs), which were experienced in 67% of respondents. Approximately 75% of the individuals reported that their overall quality of life was affected by adverse events.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that discussions alone do not provide patients with sufficient understanding of the events, nor do they appear to adequately equip patients to cope with them. Therefore, efforts to improve cancer care should focus on developing tools to improve patients' understanding of the toxicities of chemotherapy, as well as providing resources to reduce the effects of adverse events.

A comprehensive prognostic stratification for patients with metastatic renal clear cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To develop a reliable prognostic model for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) based on features readily available in common clinical settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 197 patients with RCC who underwent nephrectomy and immunotherapy from 1995 to 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. Their mean age was 55.1+/-11.8 yrs (24-83 yrs) and mean survival time from metastasis was 22.6+/-20.2 mos (3-120 mos). The impact of 24 clinicopathological features on disease specific survival was investigated.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, constitutional symptoms, sarcomatoid differentiation, tumor necrosis, multiple primary lesions, liver metastasis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS), thrombocytosis, alkaline phosphatase, hematocrit, T stage, N stage, and nuclear grade had significant influence on survival (p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed the following features associated with survival: sarcomatoid differentiation [hazard ratio (HR)=2.99, p<0.001], liver metastasis (HR=2.09, p=0.002), ECOG-PS (HR=1.95, p=0.005), N stage (HR=1.94, p=0.002), and number of metastatic sites (HR=1.76, p=0.003). An individual prognostic score was defined as the sum of the weight of these features. According to prognostic scores, patients could be subdivided into 3 groups: low risk (score 0), intermediate risk (score 1 or 2), and high risk (score >or= 3).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive prognostic stratification model was developed to predict survival and stratify patients for prospective clinical trials.

Renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The recent contributions to renal cell carcinoma in the fields of molecular biology and the expanded use of molecularly targeted agents will be reviewed. This study is intended to update prognostic and therapeutic decision-making data and provide perspective on advances in understanding the molecular biology of this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Updates to the currently used prognostic algorithms for renal cell carcinoma are needed, and recently verified prognostic nomograms will be discussed. This comes in the wake of numerous advances in the use of molecularly targeted drugs, which will be reviewed. Finally, advancements in understanding the biology of renal cell carcinoma include the discovery of von Hippel-Lindau associated mechanisms involved in renal cyst formation and renewed appreciation for the influence of this pathway on the tumor cell glucose utilization profile.

SUMMARY

Renal cell carcinoma continues to evolve swiftly with the approval of new agents and the maturation of clinical trials to provide relevant structure to treatment decisions. This study will give an overview of the latest concepts in the epidemiology and biology of renal cell carcinoma and provide current surgical and systemic updates for managing renal cell carcinoma.

Disparities in treatment and outcome for renal cell cancer among older black and white patients

PURPOSE

Black patients with renal cell cancer have shorter survival compared with their white counterparts, but the causes for this disparity are unclear. To elucidate reasons for this inequality, we examined differences in treatment and survival between black and white patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry and Medicare databases. Participants included 964 black and 10,482 white patients age >or= 65 years who were enrolled into Medicare and diagnosed with renal cell cancer between 1986 and 1999. Information on surgical treatment was ascertained from both databases, whereas data regarding coexisting illness and survival was obtained from the Medicare database.

RESULTS

The percentage of black patients receiving nephrectomy treatment was significantly lower compared with whites (61.2% v 70.4%; P < .0001). After adjustment for age, sex, median income, cancer stage, tumor size, and comorbidity index, blacks were less likely to undergo nephrectomy treatment compared with whites (risk ratio = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90 to 0.96). Overall survival was worse for blacks than whites even after adjustment for demographic and cancer prognostic factors (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.25); however, additional adjustment for comorbidity index and nephrectomy treatment reduced the disparity substantially (HR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.09).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the lower survival rate among blacks compared with whites with renal cell cancer can be explained largely by the increased number of comorbid health conditions and the lower rate of surgical treatment among black patients.