Graft Survival After Video-assisted Minilaparotomy Living-donor Nephrectomy or Conventional Open Nephrectomy: Do Left and Right Allografts Differ?

Right and left living donor nephrectomy and operative approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis of donor and recipient outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The left kidney is preferable in living donor nephrectomy (LDN). We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of right versus left LDN in both donor and recipients. A subgroup analysis of outcomes based on operative approach was also performed.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes of interest were extracted from included studies and analysed.

RESULTS

There were 31 studies included with 79,912 transplants. Left LDN was performed in 84.1 % of cases and right LDN in 15.9 %. Right LDN was associated with reduced EBL (P = 0.010), intra-operative complications (P = 0.030) and operative time (P = 0.006), but higher rates of conversion to open surgery (1.4 % vs 0.9 %). However, right living donor renal transplantation (LDRT) had higher rates of delayed graft function (5.4 % vs 4.2 %, P < 0.0001) and graft loss (2.6 % vs 1.1 %, P < 0.0001). Graft survival was reduced in right LDRT at 3 years (92.0 % vs 94.2 %, P = 0.001) but comparable to left LDRT at 1- and 5-years. Otherwise, donor and recipient peri-operative outcomes and serum creatinine levels were comparable in both groups. Hand-assisted LDN was associated with shorter warm ischaemia time (P < 0.0001) but longer length of stay (LOS) than laparoscopic LDN and robotic-assisted LDN (P < 0.0001). RA-LDN was associated with less EBL and shorter LOS (both P < 0.0001) while patients who underwent L-LDN had a lower mean serum creatinine (SCr) level on discharge (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Right LDRT has higher rates of delayed graft function and graft loss compared to left LDRT. Minimally-invasive surgical approaches potentially offer improved outcomes but further large-scale randomised controlled trials studies are required to confirm this finding.

Association Between Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Diabetic Macular Edema in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and diabetic macular edema (DME) and the effect of OSA on refractory DME in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

METHODS

A population-based study was conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from March 1, 2009, to March 1, 2020. Among 14,152 patients who had undergone polysomnography (PSG) and whose data were registered on the sleep center's PSG database, 121 patients (242 eyes) with T2DM were enrolled according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) code 3620 for diabetic retinopathy (DR). Patients with a secondary cause of macular edema and those lacking medical records were excluded. All patients with T2DM enrolled in our study received both optical coherence tomography (OCT) and PSG. The prevalence of severe (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥30) and nonsevere (AHI <30) OSA was compared between patients with and without DME and refractory DME.

RESULTS

In total, 102 eyes (54 patients) were divided into groups of 40 eyes with DME or 62 eyes without DME. Severe OSA (odds ratio, 7.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-40.96; P = .023) was significantly associated with DME. Refractory DME was significantly more frequent in patients with severe OSA (27%) than in those with nonsevere OSA (0%; P = .009). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that OSA (hazard ratio, 2.97; CI, 1.08-8.16; P = .034) independently increased the DME risk after adjustment for age, sex, glycohemoglobin level, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe OSA is a risk factor for DME and is associated with having refractory DME.

Impact of Cigarette Smoking on Living Kidney Donors

BACKGROUND

Smoking is known to result in a decline in renal allograft function and survival of recipients; however, the effect of smoking on living kidney donors remains unknown. In this study we evaluated the impact of cigarette smoking on renal function of kidney donors.

METHODS

Among 1056 donors who underwent nephrectomy, 612 completed the 6-month follow-up protocol and were enrolled in the study. The association of smoking status, including pack-years smoking history, and postoperative renal function was evaluated.

RESULTS

Among donors, 68.1% had never smoked, 8% were former smokers, and 23.9% were current smokers. Donors who never smoked were older than former and current smokers (42.3 ± 11.8, 41.9 ± 11.1, and 38.3 ± 10.9 years, respectively; P < .001). There was no difference in preoperative renal function between groups; however, postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was lower in former and current smokers than in those who never smoked (64.6 ± 13.8, 64.7 ± 12.3, and 67.8 ± 13.1 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively; P = .023). In former and current smokers, pack-years smoking history was negatively associated with pre- and postoperative eGFR (r = -0.305 and -0.435, P < .001), and correlated with postoperative percent eGFR decline (r = 0.248, P < .001). Smoking history was associated with postoperative development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Especially in former smokers, a smoking history of more than 12 pack-years was strongly associated with development of CKD (odds ratio = 7.5, P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Even if they no longer smoke, donors with a smoking history require close observation due to increased risk of CKD development after kidney donation. A detailed pack-years smoking history should be obtained, and smoking cessation strategies should be implemented in kidney donors.