1
|
Lu D, Zhou J, Cai J, Liu L, Ni Y. Clinical value of ultrasound-guided full-needle path anesthesia in transperineal prostate biopsy: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e39008. [PMID: 39029080 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000039008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pain sensation in a transperineal prostate biopsy was obvious. This study explored the clinical value of ultrasound-guided full-needle path anesthesia in transperineal prostate biopsy. METHODS Two hundred patients who underwent ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy at our department were randomly divided into 2 groups. The control group received routine local infiltration anesthesia, and the experimental group received ultrasound-guided full-needle path anesthesia. Immediately after biopsy, visual analog scoring was used to evaluate pain during the biopsy process. Seven days postbiopsy, telephone follow-up revealed symptoms, such as hematuria and discomfort during urination. The measured data were expressed as x ± s. The 2 groups were compared using the t test, and the differences were statistically significant (P < .05). RESULTS There were no significant differences in age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, or prostate volume between the 2 groups, and all patients underwent prostate biopsy. The pain score of visual analog score was (2.55 ± 0.88), urination discomfort was (1.86 ± 0.67) days and hematuria time was (2.87 ± 0.91) days in the experimental group after biopsy. In the control group, the pain score of visual analog scale was (4.32 ± 0.94), the urination discomfort was (2.3 ± 0.77) days, and the hematuria time was (2.85 ± 0.83) days. Pain scores and urination discomfort were compared between the 2 groups (P < .01). Pain and urination discomfort associated with prostate biopsy in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group. CONCLUSION Ultrasound-guided full needle path anesthesia can alleviate pain sensation in patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy and has high clinical value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DianYuan Lu
- Department of Ultrasound, Chongming Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chung Y, Hong SK. Shifting to transperineal prostate biopsy: A narrative review. Prostate Int 2024; 12:10-14. [PMID: 38523899 PMCID: PMC10960089 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
To address the limitations and challenges associated with transrectal (TR) biopsy and to present transperineal (TP) biopsy as a viable and potentially safer alternative to TR biopsy. Prostate cancer (PCa) is a significant global health concern. The prevalence of advanced-stage prostate cancer in Asia is higher than that in the United States, emphasizing the need for effective screening and diagnosis methods. The gold standard of diagnosis is a TR biopsy. However, it has limitations due to the risk of infection and potential complications, such as injury to the rectal artery. Efforts have been made to address issues such as false-negative biopsies, under-sampling, and over-sampling through MRI-guided biopsies. However, the TR approach makes it difficult to access the apical and anterior regions of the prostate. TP biopsy has emerged as an alternative to address the limitations of TR biopsy. Nevertheless, a TP biopsy is a painful procedure, requiring the use of general anesthesia and expensive equipment. As a result, it has been perceived as costly and time-consuming. In addition, it requires a steep learning curve. The introduction of local anesthesia such as pudendal nerve block and the adoption of freehand techniques have contributed to the feasibility of performing TP biopsy. Recent research indicates that freehand TP biopsy can yield comparable diagnostic results to template-guided approaches. The diagnostic performance, cancer detection rates, and complication rates of TP biopsy have demonstrated its potential as a safe and effective diagnostic method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Younsoo Chung
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sung Kyu Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vanoli S, Grobet-Jeandin E, Windisch O, Valerio M, Benamran D. Evolution of anxiety management in prostate biopsy under local anesthesia: a narrative review. World J Urol 2024; 42:43. [PMID: 38244150 PMCID: PMC10799769 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04723-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND METHODS Prostate biopsy (PB) is an essential step in the diagnosis and active surveillance of prostate cancer (PCa). Transperineal PB (TP-PB) is now the recommended approach and is mostly conducted under local anesthesia. However, this procedure can potentially cause anxiety for patients, given the oncological context and the fear of peri-procedural pain and complications. The objective of this narrative review is to summarize the currently available tools for the management of peri-interventional anxiety during TP-PB, with a particular emphasis on the potential role of virtual reality (VR) in this setting. RESULTS In TP-PB, preoperative anxiety can lead to increased pain perception, longer procedure time, and decreased patient satisfaction. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches have been explored to reduce anxiety, such as premedication, deep sedation, education, relaxation techniques, hypnosis, and music therapy, albeit with mixed results. VR has recently emerged in the technological armamentarium for managing pain and anxiety, and the efficiency of this technology has been evaluated in various medical fields, including pediatrics, gastroenterology, urology, gynecology, and psychiatry. CONCLUSION Despite the paucity of available data, VR appears to be a safe and effective technique in reducing anxiety in many procedures, even in frail patients. No studies have evaluated the role of VR in TP-PB. Future research should thus explore the optimal way to implement VR technology and any potential benefits for TP-PB patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Vanoli
- Urology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Elisabeth Grobet-Jeandin
- Urology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Windisch
- Urology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Urology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Urology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
He BM, Yang QW, Shi ZK, Ji TR, Wang SD, Zhou H, Jin ZC, Yan ZC, Zhang JJ, Wang HF. Association of biopsy core number and location with pain in patients undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia: a secondary analysis of the APROPOS trial. Int J Surg 2023; 109:3061-3069. [PMID: 37526126 PMCID: PMC10583920 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND APROPOS was a multicentre, randomized, blinded trial focus on investigating the perineal nerve block versus the periprostatic block in pain control for men undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy. In the analysis reported here, the authors aimed to evaluate the association of biopsy core count and location with pain outcomes in patients undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia. METHODS APROPOS was performed at six medical centers in China. Patients with suspected prostate cancer were randomized to receive either a perineal nerve block or a periprostatic block (1:1), followed by a transperineal prostate biopsy. The secondary analysis outcomes were the worst pain experienced during the prostate biopsy and postbiopsy pain at 1,6, and 24 h. RESULTS Between 12 August 2020 and 20 July 2022, a total of 192 patients were randomized in the original trial, and 188 were involved in this analysis, with 94 patients per group. Participants had a median (IQR) age of 68 (63-72) and a median (IQR) prostate volume of 42.51 (30.04-62.84). The patient population had a median (IQR) number of biopsy cores of 15 (12-17.50), and 26.06% of patients had a biopsy cores count of more than 15. After adjusting the baseline characteristics, the number of biopsy cores was associated with the worst pain during the biopsy procedure in both the perineal nerve block group ( β 0.19, 95% CI: 0.12-0.26, P <0.001) and the periprostatic block group ( β 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07-0.24, P <0.001). A similar association was also evident for the postbiopsy pain at 1, 6, and 24 h. A lesser degree of pain in both groups at any time (r range -0.57 to -0.01 for both groups) was associated with biopsy cores from the peripheral zone of the middle gland, while other locations were associated with a higher degree of pain. In addition, the location of the biopsy core had less of an effect on pain during the biopsy (r range -0.01-0.25 for both groups) than it did on postbiopsy pain (r range -0.57-0.60 for both groups). CONCLUSIONS In this secondary analysis of a randomized trial, biopsy core count and location were associated with pain in patients undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia. These results may be helpful for making clinical decisions about the anesthetic approach for scheduled transperineal prostate biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bi-Ming He
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
| | - Qi-Wei Yang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
| | - Zhen-Kai Shi
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
| | - Tang-Rao Ji
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
- Department of Urology, Lanxi People’s Hospital, Lanxi, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuai-Dong Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
| | - Hai Zhou
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
| | - Zhi-Chao Jin
- Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai
| | - Zhi-Chao Yan
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
| | - Jia-Jun Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
| | - Hai-Feng Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kanagarajah A, Hogan D, Yao HH, Dundee P, O'Connell HE. A systematic review on the outcomes of local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2023; 131:408-423. [PMID: 36177521 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess the diagnostic ability, complication rate, patient tolerability, and cost of local anaesthetic (LA) transperineal prostate biopsy. METHODS Two reviewers searched Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Embase for publications on LA transperineal prostate biopsy up to March 2021. Outcomes of interest included cancer detection rates, complication rates, pain assessments and cost. RESULTS A total of 35 publications with 113 944 men were included in this review. The cancer detection rate for LA transperineal prostate biopsy in patients undergoing primary biopsy was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.60; I2 = 97) and the clinically significant cancer detection rate (Gleason≥3 + 4) was 37% (95% CI 0.24-0.52; I2 = 99%). The rate of infection-related complications in the included studies was 0.15% (95% CI 0.0000-0.0043; I2 = 86). The LA transperineal procedures had a low rate of procedural abandonment (26/6954, 0.37%), with the greatest pain scores measured during LA administration. No formal cost analyses on LA transperineal prostate biopsies were identified in the literature. The overall risk of bias in the included studies was high, with considerable study heterogeneity and publication bias. CONCLUSION Transperineal prostate biopsy performed under LA is a viable option for centres interested in avoiding the risk of infection associated with transrectal biopsy, and the logistical burden of general anaesthesia. Further investigation into LA transperineal prostate biopsy with comparative studies is warranted for its consideration as the standard in prostate biopsy technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abbie Kanagarajah
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Austin Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Donnacha Hogan
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Henry H Yao
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Philip Dundee
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
He BM, Ka-Fung Chiu P, Tao T, Lan JH, Cai JT, Zhou SC, Li RB, Ren Y, Ka-Lun L, Xu RY, Chen JR, Lan D, Gao JL, Chu SG, Jin ZC, Huang FF, Shi ZK, Yang QW, Zhou H, Wang SD, Ji TR, Han QP, Wang CM, Chi-Fai N, Wang HF. Perineal nerve block versus periprostatic block for patients undergoing transperineal prostate biopsy (APROPOS): a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 58:101919. [PMID: 37007736 PMCID: PMC10060616 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to investigate perineal nerve block versus periprostatic block in pain control for men undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy. Methods In this prospective, randomised, blinded and parallel-group trial, men in six Chinese hospitals with suspected prostate cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) at the point of local anaesthesia to receive a perineal nerve block or periprostatic block and followed by a transperineal prostate biopsy. Centres used their usual biopsy procedure. Operators who performed anaesthesia were trained in both techniques before the trial and were masked to the randomised allocation until the time of anaesthesia and were not involved in the subsequent biopsy procedure and any assessment or analysis. Other investigators and the patients were masked until trial completion. The primary outcome was the level of the worst pain experienced during the prostate biopsy procedure. Secondary outcomes included pain (post-biopsy at 1, 6 and 24 h), changes in blood pressure, heart rate and breathing rate during the biopsy procedure, external manifestations of pain during biopsy, anaesthesia satisfaction, the detection rate of PCa and clinically significant PCa. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04501055. Findings Between August 13, 2020, and July 20, 2022, 192 men were randomly assigned to perineal nerve block or periprostatic block, 96 per study group. Perineal nerve block was superior for the relief of pain during the biopsy procedure (mean 2.80 for perineal nerve block and 3.98 for periprostatic block; adjusted difference in means -1.17, P < 0.001). Although the perineal nerve block had a lower mean pain score at 1 h post-biopsy compared with the periprostatic block (0.23 vs 0.43, P = 0.042), they were equivalent at 6 h (0.16 vs 0.25, P = 0.389) and 24 h (0.10 vs 0.26, P = 0.184) respectively. For the change in vital signs during biopsy procedure, perineal nerve block was significantly superior to periprostatic block in terms of maximum value of systolic blood pressure, maximum value of mean arterial pressure and maximum value of heart rate. There are no statistical differences in average value of systolic blood pressure, average value of mean, average value of heart rate, diastolic blood pressure and breathing rate. Perineal nerve block was also superior to periprostatic block in external manifestations of pain (1.88 vs 3.00, P < 0.001) and anaesthesia satisfaction (8.93 vs 11.90, P < 0.001). Equivalence was shown for the detection rate of PCa (31.25% for perineal nerve block and 29.17% for periprostatic block, P = 0.753) or csPCa (23.96% for perineal nerve block and 20.83% for periprostatic block, P = 0.604). 33 (34.8%) of 96 patients in the perineal nerve block group and 40 (41.67%) of 96 patients in the periprostatic block group had at least one complication. Interpretation Perineal nerve block was superior to periprostatic block in pain control for men undergoing a transperineal prostate biopsy. Funding Grant 2019YFC0119100 from the National Key Research and Development Program of China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bi-Ming He
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
- SH HO Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tao Tao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, China
| | - Jian-Hua Lan
- Department of Urology, Guang'an People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jian-Tong Cai
- Department of Urology, Shi Shi Municipal General Hospital, Fujian province, China
| | - Sheng-Cai Zhou
- Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Yiyuan County, Zibo City, Shandong, China
| | - Rong-Bing Li
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Ren
- Department of Medical Equipment, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - L.O. Ka-Lun
- SH HO Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Rong-Yao Xu
- Department of Urology, Shi Shi Municipal General Hospital, Fujian province, China
| | - Jian-Rong Chen
- Department of Urology, Shi Shi Municipal General Hospital, Fujian province, China
| | - Dong Lan
- Department of Urology, Guang'an People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jin-Li Gao
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shu-Guang Chu
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Chao Jin
- Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fang-fang Huang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhen-Kai Shi
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi-Wei Yang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai Zhou
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuai-Dong Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tang-Rao Ji
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Urology, Lanxi People's Hospital, Lanxi, China
| | - Qi-Peng Han
- Department of Urology, People's Hospital of Yiyuan County, Zibo City, Shandong, China
| | - Chang-Ming Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, China
| | - N.G. Chi-Fai
- SH HO Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hai-Feng Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, No. 150, Jimo Road, Shanghai, 200120, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wilcox Vanden Berg RN, George AK, Kaye DR. Should Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Be the Standard of Care? Curr Urol Rep 2023; 24:135-142. [PMID: 36512186 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01139-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of transperineal prostate biopsy (TP-bx) to evaluate its potential role as the standard of care for prostate biopsy. RECENT FINDINGS Studies have suggested no difference in prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate between TP-bx and transrectal biopsy (TR-bx) but have suggested potentially increased detection of anterior prostate tumors. Advances in anesthetic technique have obviated the need for sedation thus allowing TP-bx to become an office-based procedure, which in turn can decrease the overall cost of TP-bx. Furthermore, given the low rate of infectious complications after TP-bx, some have foregone peri-procedural antibiotics without a change in the rate of infectious complications. Recent procedural advances have made TP-bx a tolerable, office-based procedure. Given the similar diagnostic performance and the benefits for the patient and community, TP-bx should become the standard of care for prostate biopsy for most patients. Future efforts should address the barriers for more universal adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arvin K George
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Deborah R Kaye
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. .,Duke-Margolis Center for Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. .,Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA. .,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Cancer Center/Clinic 5-1, 20 Duke Medicine Circle Durham, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen Z, Qu M, Shen X, Jiang S, Zhang W, Ji J, Wang Y, Zhang J, Chen Z, Lin L, Li M, Wu C, Gao X. Establishment of an Individualized Predictive Model to Reduce the Core Number for Systematic Prostate Biopsy: A Dual Center Study Based on Stratification of the Disease Risk Score. Front Oncol 2022; 11:831603. [PMID: 35237503 PMCID: PMC8882832 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.831603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To establish an individualized prostate biopsy model that reduces unnecessary biopsy cores based on multiparameter MRI (mpMRI). Materials and Methods This retrospective, non-inferiority dual-center study retrospectively included 609 patients from the Changhai Hospital from June 2017 to November 2020 and 431 patients from the Fujian Union Hospital between 2014 and 2019. Clinical, radiological, and pathological data were analyzed. Data from the Changhai Hospital were used for modeling by calculating the patients’ disease risk scores. Data from the Fujian Union Hospital were used for external verification. Results Based on the data of 609 patients from the Changhai Hospital, we divided the patients evenly into five layers according to the disease risk score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was analyzed. Twelve-core systemic biopsy (12-SBx) was used as the reference standard. The SBx cores from each layer were reduced to 9, 6, 5, 4, and 4. The data of 279 patients with benign pathological results from the Fujian Union Hospital were incorporated into the model. No patients were in the first layer. The accuracies of the models for the other layers were 88, 96.43, 94.87, and 94.59%. The accuracy of each layer would be increased to 96, 100, 100, and 97.30% if the diagnosis of non-clinically significant prostate cancer was excluded. Conclusions In this study, we established an individualized biopsy model using data from a dual center. The results showed great accuracy of the model, indicating its future clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeyu Chen
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Qu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianqi Shen
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaoqin Jiang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Wenhui Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Ji
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jili Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenlin Chen
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Lu Lin
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengqiang Li
- Department of Urology, Fujian Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Cheng Wu
- Department of Health Statistics, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu Gao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Xu Gao,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cheng E, Davuluri M, Lewicki PJ, Hu JC, Basourakos SP. Developments in optimizing transperineal prostate biopsy. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:85-90. [PMID: 34783715 PMCID: PMC8622440 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate biopsy is a very commonly performed office procedure leading to the diagnosis of the most prevalent solid-organ malignancy in American men. Although the transrectal technique for prostate biopsy remains the gold standard, there is increasing interest in the transperineal approach as it offers a clean, percutaneous approach that significantly decreases the risk for infection. In this review, we discuss emerging developments in transperineal prostate biopsy that may optimize the way biopsies are performed in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS Similarly, to transrectal biopsy, the transperineal approach also allows for the performance of systematic and MRI-targeted biopsy cores. As transperineal biopsy obviates the translocation of rectal bacteria to the prostate or bloodstream, in contrast to transrectal biopsy, it is feasible to forgo peri-procedural antibiotics in accordance with professional guidelines. This may attenuate antimicrobial resistance that may be associated with augmented prophylaxis. In addition, although transperineal biopsy may be traditionally performed under general anesthesia using a template grid, it may also be performed freehand under local anesthesia or sedation. Avoiding prophylactic antibiotics and general anesthesia as well as reducing infections/hospitalizations for transperineal biopsy scaled nationally will likely result in significant healthcare savings. SUMMARY Transperineal biopsy with combined systematic and MRI-targeted cores, offers several advantages over conventional transrectal biopsy. Transperineal biopsy under local anesthesia and without periprocedural antibiotic is emerging as a promising method for prostate cancer diagnosis and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Cheng
- Department of Urology, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital/Weil Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meenakshi Davuluri
- Department of Urology, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital/Weil Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patrick J. Lewicki
- Department of Urology, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital/Weil Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jim C. Hu
- Department of Urology, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital/Weil Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Spyridon P. Basourakos
- Department of Urology, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital/Weil Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
He BM, Li RB, Wang HF. Anaesthesia in PROstate Biopsy Pain Obstruction Study: A Study Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Perineal Nerve Block in Controlling Pain in Patients Undergoing Transperineal Prostate Biopsy. Front Surg 2021; 8:649822. [PMID: 34692757 PMCID: PMC8527031 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.649822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Transperineal prostate biopsy is as effective as the transrectal biopsy in detecting prostate cancer and has a lower risk of infection. However, concerning the procedural pain of the transperineal route, a higher level of anaesthesia is needed, which prevents this approach from being widely used. Although several methods of local anaesthesia to relieve pain during transperineal biopsy have been described, few well-designed trials have been conducted to assess the efficacy of local anaesthesia. Methods: This is a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled study in men suspected of having prostate cancer and planning to undergo transperineal prostate biopsy. The aim of this trial is to determine whether the perineal nerve block and periprostatic block relieve pain to different extents in men undergoing transperineal biopsy. The main inclusion criteria are men aged between 18 and 80 years old, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 4–20 ng/ml, or/and suspicious rectal examination findings. A sample size of 190 participants, accounting for a 10% loss, is required. All participants will be randomly allocated at a ratio of 1:1 to the perineal nerve block (n = 95) and periprostatic block groups (n = 95). The primary outcome will be the level of the worst pain experienced during the transperineal prostate biopsy procedure, which will be measured by a numerical rating scale (NRS). The key secondary outcomes will include the pain severity score at 1, 6, and 24 h after prostate biopsy. Results: The primary outcome is the level of the worst pain experienced during the prostate biopsy procedure. The main secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) Post-biopsy pain severity score at 1, 6, and 24 h after the prostate biopsy; (2) Changes in blood pressure, heart rate and breathing rate during the biopsy procedure; (3) External manifestations of pain during biopsy; (4) Anaesthesia satisfaction; (5) The detection rate for clinically significant prostate cancer and any prostate cancer. Conclusion: Anaesthesia in PROstate biopsy Pain Obstruction Study (APROPOS) is randomised controlled trial aiming to determine the efficacy of the perineal nerve block in controlling pain in patients undergoing prostate biopsy via the transperineal approach. Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04501055.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bi-Ming He
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong-Bing Li
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai-Feng Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Szabo RJ. "Free-Hand" Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia: Review of the Literature. J Endourol 2021; 35:525-543. [PMID: 33380279 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.1093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The recent plethora of reports of "free-hand" transperineal prostate biopsy (fTP-Bx) under local anesthesia (LA) demonstrate that many centers consider this technique to be a safer and possibly more accurate approach to prostate biopsy in the clinic setting. Materials and Methods: The literature was searched for fTP-Bx, and summary tables were compiled. Studies on the costs of postprostate biopsy sepsis were also researched. Results: The search found 11,999 cases of fTP-Bx under LA with and without sedation over 29 mutually exclusive studies. Pooled averages calculated for age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, PSA density, and cores sampled were 67.3 years, 10.4 ng/mL, 47.7 mL, 0.24 ng/mL/cc, and 15.3 cores, respectively. Detection of overall prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (Gleason score ≥7) prostate cancer (csPCa) averaged 45.5% (3796/8338) and 25.1% (1141/4541), respectively. After subgrouping the studies by biopsy technique, studies that used MRI/ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy in some or all biopsy cases averaged an overall PCa and csPCa detection rate of 50.0% (741/1483) (p < 0.0001) and 42.8% (635/1483) (p < 0.0001), respectively. Visual analog scale pain ratings and procedure times averaged 3.17 and 13.1 minutes, respectively. Averages for complications of sepsis and acute urinary retention were 0.0% (0/7396) and 2.1% (120/5693), respectively. A total of 10.2% (1055/10,334) of cases received no antibiotic prophylaxis. If fTP-Bx under LA replaced transrectal prostate biopsy (TR-Bx) in the United States, the estimated annual savings would be $341,676,800-$752,540,000 through the virtual elimination of admissions for postbiopsy sepsis. Conclusions: Many centers around the world have adopted fTP-Bx because it virtually eliminates sepsis, may improve detection rates of csPCa and can be easily integrated into a normal clinic workflow using only LA. If all urologists in the United States abandoned TR-Bx for fTP-Bx, the potential savings in health care costs of complications would be significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Szabo
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente, Irvine, California, USA.,Department of Urology, Cinical Associate Professor, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.,Department of Urology, Volunteer Faculty, Veterans Administration Healthcare System, Long Beach, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|