1
|
Pohan RA, Astuti RD, Pohan PBA, Amalia R, Hasanah SM, Monalisa M, Herawati AA. Unveiling the neurological benefits of COVID-19 vaccination: Analyses on involuntary movements. J Neurol Sci 2024; 466:123233. [PMID: 39270412 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/08/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Rizky Andana Pohan
- Department of Islamic Guidance and Counseling, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa, Aceh, Indonesia; Jalan Meurandeh, Langsa Lama, Kota Langsa, Aceh 24416, Indonesia.
| | - Ririn Dwi Astuti
- Department of Biology Education, Yayasan Potret Indonesia Sejahtera, Kota Langsa, Aceh, Indonesia; Langsa Baro, Kota Langsa, Aceh, Indonesia
| | - Putri Bunga Aisyah Pohan
- Department of Science Education, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Jl. Colombo No.1, Karang Malang, Caturtunggal, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
| | - Riza Amalia
- Department of Guidance and Counseling, Universitas, Muhammadiyah Sampit, Kotawaringin Timur, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia; Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara No.03, Kel. Baamang Hilir, Kec. Baamang, Sampit, Indonesia.
| | - Samudra Mutiara Hasanah
- Department of Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia; Jl. Semarang 5, Malang 65145, East Java, Indonesia.
| | - Monalisa Monalisa
- Department of Islamic Guidance and Counseling, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin, Banten, Indonesia; Jl. Syekh Moh. Nawawi Albantani, Kemanisan, Kec. Curug, Kota Serang, Banten, Indonesia.
| | - Anna Ayu Herawati
- Department of Guidance and Counseling, Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia; Jl. WR. Supratman, Kandang Limun, Kec. Muara Bangka Hulu, Sumatera, Bengkulu 38371, Indonesia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Driedger SM, Maier R, Capurro G, Jardine C, Tustin J, Chartrand F, Sanguins J, Kloss O. "There's a little bit of mistrust": Red River Métis experiences of the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics. RISK ANALYSIS : AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SOCIETY FOR RISK ANALYSIS 2024; 44:1770-1787. [PMID: 38286593 DOI: 10.1111/risa.14274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
We examined the perspectives of the Red River Métis citizens in Manitoba, Canada, during the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics and how they interpreted the communication of government/health authorities' risk management decisions. For Indigenous populations, pandemic response strategies play out within the context of ongoing colonial relationships with government institutions characterized by significant distrust. A crucial difference between the two pandemics was that the Métis in Manitoba were prioritized for early vaccine access during H1N1 but not for COVID-19. Data collection involved 17 focus groups with Métis citizens following the H1N1 outbreak and 17 focus groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. Métis prioritization during H1N1 was met with some apprehension and fear that Indigenous Peoples were vaccine-safety test subjects before population-wide distribution occurred. By contrast, as one of Canada's three recognized Indigenous nations, the non-prioritization of the Métis during COVID-19 was viewed as an egregious sign of disrespect and indifference. Our research demonstrates that both reactions were situated within claims that the government does not care about the Métis, referencing past and ongoing colonial motivations. Government and health institutions must anticipate this overarching colonial context when making and communicating risk management decisions with Indigenous Peoples. In this vein, government authorities must work toward a praxis of decolonization in these relationships, including, for example, working in partnership with Indigenous nations to engage in collaborative risk mitigation and communication that meets the unique needs of Indigenous populations and limits the potential for less benign-though understandable-interpretations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Michelle Driedger
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Ryan Maier
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Gabriela Capurro
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Cindy Jardine
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Fraser Valley, Chilliwack, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jordan Tustin
- School of Occupational and Public Health, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frances Chartrand
- Health & Wellness Department, Manitoba Métis Federation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Julianne Sanguins
- Health & Wellness Department, Manitoba Métis Federation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Olena Kloss
- Health & Wellness Department, Manitoba Métis Federation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tiwana MH, Smith J. Faith and vaccination: a scoping review of the relationships between religious beliefs and vaccine hesitancy. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1806. [PMID: 38971784 PMCID: PMC11227154 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18873-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Throughout history, vaccines have proven effective in addressing and preventing widespread outbreaks, leading to a decrease in the spread and fatality rates of infectious diseases. In a time where vaccine hesitancy poses a significant challenge to public health, it is important to identify the intricate interplay of factors exemplified at the individual and societal levels which influence vaccination behaviours. Through this analysis, we aim to shed new light on the dynamics of vaccine hesitancy among religious groups, contributing to the broader effort to promote vaccine uptake, dispel misunderstandings, and encourage constructive dialogue with these groups. METHODS We used the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) using the 20-point checklist to guide this review. The inclusion criteria for our study were that the literature should be in English, concerned with vaccine hesitancy as the focus of study, study the impact religiosity or religious beliefs as either an outcome or control variable, concerning population levels, and be peer-reviewed. RESULTS We analysed 14 peer-reviewed articles that included components related to religiosity or religious beliefs and their impact on vaccine hesitancy published until September 2023. All the articles were published in approximately the last decade between 2012 and 2023, with only 4 of the articles published before 2020. Out of the 14 studies included in our review, twelve utilized quantitative methods, while the remaining two employed qualitative approaches. Among the studies included in our analysis, we found various approaches to categorizing religious belief and identity. In most studies when religion is uniformly regarded as the sole determinant of vaccine hesitancy, it consistently emerges as a significant factor in contributing to vaccine hesitancy. All studies in our review reported sociodemographic factors to some degree related to vaccine hesitancy within their sample populations. Our analysis underscored the need for nuanced approaches to addressing vaccine hesitancy among religious groups. CONCLUSION Vaccine hesitancy is a complex issue and driven by a myriad of individual and societal factors among which religious beliefs is commonly associated to be a driver of higher levels among populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Haaris Tiwana
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall, Room 11810, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
| | - Julia Smith
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall, Room 11810, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luisi M, Geana MV, Pei J. Pandemic antecedents - Exploring predictivity and relationships between COVID-19 vaccine uptake and influenza, shingles, and HPV vaccination. Vaccine 2024; 42:2455-2462. [PMID: 38461049 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A wealth of extant research focuses on identifying barriers to, and predictors of, COVID-19 vaccination. In addition to treating COVID-19 vaccination and related experiences as antecedents, this study analyzes the relationships between COVID-19 vaccination experiences and intent to receive the flu, shingles, and HPV vaccines. METHOD Analyses were performed on the responses from U.S. survey panel of 1,024 participants (n = 1,024), 530 (51.8 %) who received at least a dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and 494 (48.2 %) who had not. Descriptive and inferential statistics identify participant demographic characteristics, prior vaccination behavior, vaccination intentions, risk behavior assessment, vaccination attitudes and beliefs, and the predictivity of COVID-19 vaccination, when treated as an antecedent. RESULTS Receiving a first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine interacted with receiving a past influenza vaccine, predicting the future intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine or booster. Vaccine hesitancy in parents is significantly related to vaccination behaviors for themselves and their children. Analyses also showed differences between the vaccinated group (VG) and the unvaccinated group (UVG) on hesitancy, beliefs, and attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION Experience with COVID-19 vaccination and the relationship of those experiences with other vaccinations provide useful insight on leveraging vaccine uptake. Healthcare professionals should improve the COVID-19 vaccination experience and use vaccination appointments to promote other vaccinations. Research should continue to compare vaccination experiences and how they may persuade or dissuade vaccination intent for other vaccinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique Luisi
- School of Journalism, University of Missouri, 178 Gannett Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
| | - Mugur V Geana
- Center for Excellence in Health Communication to Underserved Populations, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., Suite 2001, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
| | - Jun Pei
- Center for Excellence in Health Communication to Underserved Populations, School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Ave., Suite 2001, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marfo EA, Manca T, Cha E, Aylsworth L, Driedger SM, Meyer SB, Pelletier C, Dubé È, MacDonald SE. Intersecting Inequities in COVID-19 Vaccination: A Discourse Analysis of Information Use and Decision-Making Among Ethnically Diverse Parents in Canada. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2024:10.1007/s40615-024-01940-2. [PMID: 38409490 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-01940-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about how intersecting social privilege and disadvantage contribute to inequities in COVID-19 information use and vaccine access. This study explored how social inequities intersect to shape access to and use of COVID-19 information and vaccines among parents in Canada. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews on COVID-19 vaccination information use with ethnically diverse parents of children ages 11 to 18 years from April to August 2022. We purposefully invited parents from respondents to a national online survey to ensure representation across diverse intersecting social identities. Five researchers coded transcripts in NVivo using a discourse analysis approach informed by intersectionality. Our analysis focused on use of vaccine information and intersecting privileges and oppressions, including identifying with equity-denied group(s). RESULTS Interview participants (N = 48) identified as ethnically diverse non-Indigenous (n = 40) and Indigenous (n = 8) Peoples from seven Canadian provinces. Racialized minority or Indigenous participants reflected on historical and contemporary events of racism from government and medical institutions as barriers to trust and access to COVID-19 information, vaccines, and the Canadian healthcare system. Participants with privileged social locations showed greater comfort in resisting public health measures. Despite the urgency to receive COVID-19 vaccines, information gaps and transportation barriers delayed vaccination among some participants living with chronic medical conditions. CONCLUSION Historicization of colonialism and ongoing events of racism are a major barrier to trusting public health information. Fostering partnerships with trusted leaders and/or healthcare workers from racialized communities may help rebuild trust. Healthcare systems need to continuously implement strategies to restore trust with Indigenous and racialized populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Terra Manca
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, Athabasca, AB, Canada
| | - Eunah Cha
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Laura Aylsworth
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - S Michelle Driedger
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Samantha B Meyer
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Catherine Pelletier
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Quebec- Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Ève Dubé
- Department of Anthropology, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Toshkov D. What accounts for the variation in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Eastern, Southern and Western Europe? Vaccine 2023; 41:3178-3188. [PMID: 37059674 PMCID: PMC10070781 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
In the wake of mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in 2021, significant differences in vaccine skepticism emerged across Europe, with Eastern European countries in particular facing very high levels of vaccine hesitancy and refusal. This study investigates the determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and refusal, with a focus on these differences across Eastern, Southern and Western Europe. The statistical analyses are based on individual-level survey data comprising quota-based representative samples from 27 European countries from May 2021. The study finds that demographic variables have complex associations with vaccine hesitancy and refusal. The relationships with age and education are non-linear. Trust in different sources of health-related information has significant associations as well, with people who trust the Internet, social networks and 'people around' in particular being much more likely to express vaccine skepticism. Beliefs in the safety and effectiveness of vaccines have large predictive power. Importantly, this study shows that the associations of demographic, belief-related and other individual-level factors with vaccine hesitancy and refusal are context-specific. Yet, explanations of the differences in vaccine hesitancy across Eastern, Southern and Eastern Europe need to focus on why levels of trust and vaccine-relevant beliefs differ across regions, because the effects of these variables appear to be similar. It is the much higher prevalence of factors such as distrust of national governments and medical processionals as sources of relevant medical information in Eastern Europe that are relevant for explaining the higher levels of vaccine skepticism observed in that region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimiter Toshkov
- Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|