The multifactorial impact of receiving a hereditary angioedema diagnosis

Inter-α-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4 (ITIH4) as a compensatory protease inhibitor in hereditary angioedema

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a genetic disorder that manifests as recurrent angioedema attacks, most frequently due to absent or reduced C1 inhibitor (C1INH) activity. C1INH is a crucial regulator of enzymatic cascades in the complement, fibrinolytic, and contact systems. Inter-α-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4 (ITIH4) is an abundant plasma protease inhibitor that can inhibit enzymes in the proteolytic pathways associated with HAE. Nothing is known about its role in HAE.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated ITIH4 activation in HAE, establishing it as a potential biomarker, and explored its involvement in HAE-associated proteolytic pathways.

METHODS

Specific immunoassays for noncleaved ITIH4 (intact ITIH4) and an assay detecting both intact and cleaved ITIH4 (total ITIH4) were developed. We initially tested serum samples from HAE patients (n = 20), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced edema patients (ACEI) (n = 20), and patients with HAE of unknown cause (HAE-UNK) (n = 20). Validation involved an extended cohort of 80 HAE patients (60 with HAE-C1INH type 1, 20 with HAE-C1INH type 2), including samples taken during attack and quiescent disease periods, as well as samples from 100 healthy controls.

RESULTS

In 63% of HAE patients, intact ITIH4 assay showed lower signals than total ITIH4 assay. This difference was not observed in ACEI and HAE-UNK patients. Western blot analysis confirmed cleaved ITIH4 with low intact ITIH4 samples. In serum samples lacking intact endogenous ITIH4, we observed immediate cleavage of added recombinant ITIH4, suggesting continuous enzymatic activity in the serum. Confirmatory HAE cohort analysis revealed significantly lower intact ITIH4 levels in both type 1 and type 2 HAE patients compared to controls, with consistently low intact/total ITIH4 ratios during clinical HAE attacks.

CONCLUSION

The disease-specific low intact ITIH4 levels highlight its unique nature in HAE. ITIH4 may exhibit compensatory mechanisms in HAE, suggesting its utility as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. The variations during quiescent and active disease periods raise intriguing questions about the dynamics of proteolytic pathways in HAE.

Efficacy and Safety of Donidalorsen for Hereditary Angioedema

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema is a rare disorder characterized by episodic, potentially life-threatening swelling caused by kallikrein-kinin dysregulation. Long-term prophylaxis can stabilize this system. Donidalorsen, an antisense oligonucleotide, specifically reduces prekallikrein expression.

METHODS

In this phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with hereditary angioedema to receive donidalorsen (80 mg subcutaneously) or placebo once every 4 or 8 weeks. The primary end point was the time-normalized number of investigator-confirmed hereditary angioedema attacks per 4 weeks (attack rate) from week 1 to week 25.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients received donidalorsen every 4 weeks (45 patients), donidalorsen every 8 weeks (23 patients), or placebo (22 patients). The least-squares mean time-normalized attack rate was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.73) in the 4-week group, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.59) in the 8-week group, and 2.26 (95% CI, 1.66 to 3.09) in the placebo group. The mean attack rate from week 1 to week 25 was 81% lower (95% CI, 65 to 89) in the 4-week group than in the placebo group (P<0.001) and 55% lower (95% CI, 22 to 74) in the 8-week group than in the placebo group (P = 0.004); the median reduction in the attack rate from baseline was 90% in the 4-week group, 83% in the 8-week group, and 16% in the placebo group. The mean attack rate during weeks 5 to 25 was 87% lower (95% CI, 72 to 94) in the 4-week group than in the placebo group (P<0.001) and 60% lower (95% CI, 25 to 79) in the 8-week group than in the placebo group. Donidalorsen administered every 4 weeks resulted in an improvement in the least-squares mean total score for the change at week 25 on the Angioedema Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 100, with a score of 100 indicating the worst possible quality of life) that was 18.6 points (95% CI, 9.5 to 27.7) better than that with placebo (P<0.001). The most common adverse events were erythema at the injection site, headache, and nasopharyngitis; 98% of adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Donidalorsen treatment reduced the hereditary angioedema attack rate, a finding that supports potential prophylactic use for hereditary angioedema. (Funded by Ionis Pharmaceuticals; OASIS-HAE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05139810.).

Berotralstat for long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema in Japan: Parts 2 and 3 of the randomized APeX-J Phase III trial

Background

Berotralstat is a once-daily oral inhibitor of plasma kallikrein for the prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) in patients ≥12 years. APeX-J aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of berotralstat in Japan.

Methods

APeX-J was a Phase III trial comprising 3 parts (NCT03873116). Part 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of berotralstat 150 or 110 mg over 24 weeks. Part 2 was a 28-week dose-blinded phase in which berotralstat-treated patients continued the same dose and placebo patients were re-randomized to berotralstat 150 or 110 mg. In Part 3, all patients remaining on study received berotralstat 150 mg in an open-label manner for up to an additional 52 weeks. The primary endpoint of Parts 2 and 3 was long-term safety and tolerability, and secondary endpoints examined effectiveness.

Results

Seventeen patients entered Part 2, and 11 continued into Part 3. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 14/17 patients (82.4%) in Parts 2 or 3; the most common were nasopharyngitis, abdominal pain, cystitis, influenza, and vertigo. One patient (5.9%) experienced a drug-related TEAE (Grade 4 increased hepatic enzyme). No drug-related serious TEAEs were reported. For patients who completed 26 months of treatment with berotralstat 150 mg (n = 5), mean (standard error of the mean) monthly HAE attack rates and on-demand medication use decreased from baseline by 1.15 (0.09) attacks/month and 2.8 (0.64) doses/month, respectively. Sustained improvements were also observed in patient quality of life and treatment satisfaction.

Conclusions

Long-term prophylaxis with berotralstat raised no new safety signals and was effective at reducing attacks and improving patient-reported outcomes.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03873116. Registered March 13, 2019. Retrospectively registered.

Hong Kong-Macau Severe Hives and Angioedema Referral Pathway

Background

Urticaria (defined as the presence of hives, angioedema, or both) can be caused by a variety of etiologies ranging from more common conditions such as chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) to rarer conditions such as hereditary angioedema (HAE). Specialist referral may be necessary in cases of severe urticaria or HAE, but access to specialist services remains limited in certain regions, such as the Greater Bay Area (GBA) of China. To address this, the Hong Kong-Macau Severe Hives and Angioedema Referral Pathway (SHARP) was initiated by the Hong Kong Institute of Allergy and Macau Society of Dermatology to promote multidisciplinary collaboration and regional exchange of expertise in the diagnosis and management of severe urticaria.

Methods

A nominated task force of dermatologists and immunologists who manage patients with severe urticaria formulated the consensus statements (CS) using the Delphi method. The consensus was defined a priori as an agreement of ≥80%.

Results

A total of 24 CS were formulated, including four statements on classifications and definitions, seven statements on diagnosis, and 13 statements on management and referral. The definitions for acute/chronic urticaria and severe CSU were stated. Unnecessary investigations and inappropriate medications were discouraged. The characteristics and recommended approach to suspected bradykinergic angioedema were specified. Stepwise treatment options using second-generation antihistamines, omalizumab, or cyclosporin for patients with CSU were addressed, and the importance of access to HAE-specific medications was emphasized. Furthermore, an integrated referral pathway for patients with severe hives and angioedema was constructed.

Conclusion

The SHARP provides guidance for the management and specialist referral of patients with severe hives and angioedema in Hong Kong and Macau.