Performance evaluation of a small-scale digester for achieving decentralised management of waste

Life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis of small-scale anaerobic digestion system treating food waste onsite under different operational conditions

This study employed life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the environmental and economic profile of a real decentralized small-scale anaerobic digestion (AD) system treating food waste (FW). Different operational conditions, including temperature, biochar addition, biogas engine efficiency, and FW loading, were compared via scenario analysis. Biochar addition could potentially obtain carbon reduction and save fossil fuel. Moreover, at high FW loading and biogas engine efficiency, biochar addition achieved 1-3190% better performance than the system without biochar in all the nine impact categories. The system under mesophilic conditions performed worse than ambient conditions due to high energy demand. All the current scenarios resulted in a monetary loss at US$ 480 k-681 k, while profit was possible if the capital cost and operator salary decreased significantly. Overall, operating the small-scale AD system under ambient temperature with biochar addition was preferred due to its potential environmental benefits and economic profits.

A closed loop case study of decentralized food waste management: System performance and life cycle carbon emission assessment

Food waste (FW) has become a worldwide issue, while anaerobic digestion (AD) has appeared as a widely adopted technology to recover energy and resources from FW. Compared to many existing case studies of centralized AD system, the comprehensive study of decentralized micro-AD system from both system energy efficiency and carbon emission perspective is still scanty, particularly system operated under ambient temperature conditions. In this study, an actual decentralized micro-AD system with treating capacity of 300 kg FW/d for a local hawker center in Singapore was reported and evaluated. The results showed that 1894.5 kg of FW was treated and 173 m3 biogas with methane content of 53 % was produced during the experimental period of 75 days. The methane yield results showed a high FW degradation efficiency (87.87 %). However, net energy consumption and net carbon emission were observed during the experimental period. Nevertheless, energy self-efficiency and carbon neutrality, even net energy output and carbon reduction, can be achieved by increasing daily FW loading and biogas engine efficiency. Specifically, the FW loading for system energy self-efficiency was identified as 159 kg/d for engine efficiency of 35 % at a high kitchen waste/table waste ratio (63 %/37 %, with covid-19 dine-in restrictions); while they were 112 and 58 kg/d for engine efficiency of 25 % and 35 %, respective, at a low kitchen waste/table waste ratio (31 %/69 %, without covid-19 dine-in restrictions). The carbon emission ranged from 156.08 kg CO2-eq/t FW to -77.35 kg CO2-eq/t FW depending on the FW loading quantity and engine efficiency. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis also showed that the used electricity source for substitution influenced the carbon emission performance significantly. The obtained results imply that the decentralized micro-AD system could be a feasible FW management solution for energy generation and carbon reduction when the FW loading and engine electrical efficiency are carefully addressed.

Life cycle assessment of waste management in rural areas in the transition period from mixed collection to source-separation

Rural solid waste management is essential for fulfilling sustainable development goals, especially in developing countries. However, quantitative study on this aspect has been little and far behind the urban areas. In this study, the environmental impacts of four typical rural solid waste management systems were quantified using life cycle assessment based on data from field investigations of five towns across four seasons. Sensitivity analysis was used to determine the most influential parameters. The results showed that landfilling mixed waste contributed the highest environmental impacts. By substituting landfilling with incineration, the environmental impacts (i.e., global warming potential, terrestrial acidification potential, fossil resource scarcity, freshwater ecotoxicity potential) dropped about 110%-900%. When shifting collection schemes to source separation, the environmental impacts also decreased by approximately 50%-200%. However, the environmental impacts of applying source separation to the existing management systems with mixed collection and disposal facilities of landfill or waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration are unclear and depend on the performance of decentralized composting and anaerobic digestion facilities, which need further investigations. Compared with urban cases, the landfill in rural areas emits higher greenhouse gas (GHG), and WTE incineration plants in rural areas have similar GHG emissions to WTE in urban areas. Besides, energy recovery was the most influential process in WTE systems and a 1% improvement on that would bring over 10% progress on global warming potential impact category. These findings can be useful for improving and developing rural domestic waste treatment in China and other developing countries.

Nature-Based Units as Building Blocks for Resource Recovery Systems in Cities

Cities are producers of high quantities of secondary liquid and solid streams that are still poorly utilized within urban systems. In order to tackle this issue, there has been an ever-growing push for more efficient resource management and waste prevention in urban areas, following the concept of a circular economy. This review paper provides a characterization of urban solid and liquid resource flows (including water, nutrients, metals, potential energy, and organics), which pass through selected nature-based solutions (NBS) and supporting units (SU), expanding on that characterization through the study of existing cases. In particular, this paper presents the currently implemented NBS units for resource recovery, the applicable solid and liquid urban waste streams and the SU dedicated to increasing the quality and minimizing hazards of specific streams at the source level (e.g., concentrated fertilizers, disinfected recovered products). The recovery efficiency of systems, where NBS and SU are combined, operated at a micro- or meso-scale and applied at technology readiness levels higher than 5, is reviewed. The importance of collection and transport infrastructure, treatment and recovery technology, and (urban) agricultural or urban green reuse on the quantity and quality of input and output materials are discussed, also regarding the current main circularity and application challenges.

Anaerobic Digestion for Producing Renewable Energy-The Evolution of This Technology in a New Uncertain Scenario

Anaerobic digestion is a well-known technology with wide application in the treatment of high-strength organic wastes. The economic feasibility of this type of installation is usually attained thanks to the availability of fiscal incentives. In this review, an analysis of the different factors associated with this biological treatment and a description of alternatives available in literature for increasing performance of the process were provided. The possible integration of this process into a biorefinery as a way for producing energy and chemical products from the conversion of wastes and biomass also analyzed. The future outlook of anaerobic digestion will be closely linked to circular economy principles. Therefore, this technology should be properly integrated into any production system where energy can be recovered from organics. Digestion can play a major role in any transformation process where by-products need further stabilization or it can be the central core of any waste treatment process, modifying the current scheme by a concatenation of several activities with the aim of increasing the efficiency of the conversion. Thus, current plants dedicated to the treatment of wastewaters, animal manures, or food wastes can become specialized centers for producing bio-energy and green chemicals. However, high installation costs, feedstock dispersion and market distortions were recognized as the main parameters negatively affecting these alternatives.