Minimally Invasive Spinal Decompression in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age: Perioperative Risks, Complications, and Clinical Outcomes Compared with Patients Younger Than 45 Years of Age

What Preoperative Factors Are Associated With Achieving a Clinically Meaningful Improvement and Satisfaction After Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with clinically meaningful improvement, patient satisfaction and expectation fulfilment at 2 years follow-up in patients undergoing single-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a primary, single-level TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2006 and 2015 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional spine registry. Baseline characteristics and PROMs including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short-Form Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS), Mental Component Score (SF-36 MCS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) back pain, and VAS leg pain were collected preoperatively, at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 997 patients were included. Multivariate analyses showed that increasing age (OR 1.039, P < .001) and better preoperative ODI (OR .984, P = .018) were associated with achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for VAS Back. Increasing age (OR 1.032, P = .007) and better preoperative VAS Back (OR .783, P < .001) were associated with achieving MCID for VAS Leg. Lower BMI (OR .952, P = .024) and better preoperative ODI (OR .976, P < .001) were associated with achieving MCID for SF-36 PCS. Importantly, a better preoperative SF-36 MCS was associated with MCID attainment for ODI (OR 1.038, P < .001), satisfaction (OR 1.034, P < .001) and expectation fulfilment (OR 1.024, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients who were older, have less preoperative disability and better preoperative mental health were significantly more likely to attain clinically meaningful improvement in PROMs and postoperative satisfaction after single-level TLIF. Identification of these factors would aid surgeons in patient selection and surgical counselling for single-level TLIF.

Incidence of subsequent surgical decompression following minimally invasive approaches to treat lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgical decompression is the definitive treatment for managing symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis; however, select patients are poor surgical candidates. Consequently, minimally invasive procedures have gained popularity, but there exists the potential for failure of therapy necessitating eventual surgical decompression.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and characteristics of patients who require surgical decompression following minimally invasive procedures to treat lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients who underwent minimally invasive procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis (Percutaneous Image-guided Lumbar Decompression [PILD] or interspinous spacer device [ISD]) and progressed to subsequent surgical decompression within 5 years.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the rate of surgical decompression within 5 years following the minimally invasive approach. Secondary outcomes included demographic and comorbid factors associated with increased odds of requiring subsequent surgery.

METHODS

Patient data were collected using the PearlDiver-Mariner database. The rate of subsequent decompression was described as a percentage while univariable and multivariable regression analysis was used for the analysis of predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 5278 patients were included, of which 3222 (61.04%) underwent PILD, 1959 (37.12%) underwent ISD placement, and 97 (1.84%) had claims for both procedures. Overall, the incidence of subsequent surgical decompression within 5 years was 6.56% (346 of 5278 patients). Variables associated with a significantly greater odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] of requiring subsequent surgical decompression included male gender and a prior history of surgical decompression by 1.42 ([1.14, 1.77], p = 0.002) and 2.10 times ([1.39, 3.17], p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast, age 65 years and above, a diagnosis of obesity, and a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of three or greater were associated with a significantly reduced OR [95% CI] by 0.64 ([0.50, 0.81], p < 0.001), 0.62 ([0.48, 0.81], p < 0.001), and 0.71 times ([0.56, 0.91], p = 0.007), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive procedures may provide an additional option to treat symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis in patients who are poor surgical candidates or who do not desire open decompression; however, there still exists a subset of patients who will require subsequent surgical decompression. Factors such as gender and prior surgical decompression increase the likelihood of subsequent surgery, while older age, obesity, and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score reduce it. These findings aid in selecting suitable surgical candidates for better outcomes in the elderly population with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Does Tobacco Smoking Affect the Postoperative Outcome of MIS Lumbar Decompression Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Tobacco smoking is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Several authors reported a significant negative impact of smoking on the outcome of spinal surgeries. However, comparative studies on the effect of smoking on the outcome of minimally invasive (MIS) spinal decompression are rare with conflicting results. In this study, we aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and postoperative complications following MIS decompression in current and former smoking patients compared to those of non-smoking patients.

METHODS

We used our prospectively collected database to retrospectively analyse the records of 188 consecutive patients treated with MIS lumbar decompression at our institution between November 2013 and July 2017. Patients were divided into groups of smokers (S), previous smokers (PS) and non-smokers (N). The S group and the PS group comprised 31 and 40 patients, respectively. The N group included 117 patients. The outcome measures included perioperative complications, revision surgery and length of stay. Patient-reported outcome measures included a visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain, as well as the Oswestry disability index (ODI) for evaluating functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Demographic variables, comorbidity and other preoperative variables were comparable between the three groups. A comparison of perioperative complications and revision surgery rates showed no significant difference between the groups. All groups showed significant improvement in their ODI and VAS scores at 12 and 24 months following surgery. As shown by a multivariate analysis, current smokers had lower chances of improvement, exceeding the minimal clinical important difference (MCID) in ODI and VAS for leg pain at 12 months but not 24 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that except for a possible delay in improvement in leg pain and disability, tobacco smoking has no substantial adverse impact on complications and revision rates following MIS spinal decompressions.

ODI <25 Denotes Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) cutoff for achieving Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) at one year following minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

An absolute score denoting PASS, rather than a change score denoting minimal clinically important difference (MCID), might be a better metric to assess clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent primary minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or decompression were included. The outcome measure was ODI. The anchor question was the Global Rating Change: "Compared with preoperative, you feel (1) much better, (2) slightly better, (3) same, (4) slightly worse, or (5) much worse." For analysis, it was collapsed to a dichotomous outcome variable (acceptable=response of 1 or 2, unacceptable=response of 3, 4, or 5). Proportion of patients achieving PASS and the ODI cutoff using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were assessed for the overall cohort as well as subgroups based on age, sex, type of surgery, and preoperative ODI. Differences between the PASS and MCID metrics were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were included. In all, 87% of patients achieved PASS. Patients less than or equal to 65 years and those undergoing fusion were more likely to achieve PASS. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an ODI cutoff of 25.2 to achieve PASS (area under the curve: 0.872, sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 83%). The subgroup analyses based on age, sex, and preoperative ODI revealed area under the curve >0.8 and ODI threshold values consistent between 25.2 and 25.5 (except 28.4 in patients with preoperative ODI >40). PASS was found to have significantly higher sensitivity compared with MCID (82% vs. 69%, P =0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ODI <25 are expected to achieve PASS, irrespective of age, sex, and preoperative disability. PASS was found to have significantly higher sensitivity than MCID.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Minimally Invasive Resection of Benign Osseous Tumors of the Spinal Column: 10 Years' Experience and Long-Term Outcomes of a Specialized Center

Background and Objectives: Benign osseous tumors of the spinal column comprise about 10% of all spinal tumors and are rare cause for surgery. However, these tumors pose various management challenges and conventional surgery may be associated with significant morbidity. Previous reports on minimally invasive resection of these lesions are rare. We report a series of patients managed by total resection of benign osseous spine tumors using MIS techniques. Surgical decisions and technical considerations are discussed. Materials and Methods: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for removal of benign osseous vertebral tumors. Demographic, clinical and radiographic features, operative details and final pathological reports were summarized. Primary outcomes were completeness of tumor resection and pain relief assessed by VAS for back and leg pain. Secondary outcome measures were recurrence of tumor on repeat post-operative MRI and postoperative unstable deformity on standing scoliosis X-rays. Results: This series included 32 cases of primary osseous spine tumors resected by minimally invasive techniques. There were 17 males and 15 females aged 5-68 years (mean 23.3). The follow-up period was 8-90 months (mean 32 months) and the preoperative symptoms duration was 9-96 months. Axial spinal pain was the presenting symptom in all the patients. Five patients also complained about radicular pain and four patients had antalgic scoliosis. The tumor involved the thoracic spine in 12 cases, the lumbar segment in 11, the cervical in 5 and the sacral area in 4 cases. Complete tumor removal was performed in all patients. No procedure-related complications were encountered. Histopathology showed osteoid osteoma in 24 patients, osteoblastoma in 5 patients, and fibrous dysplasia, fibroadenoma and eosinophilic granuloma in one case each. All patients experienced significant pain relief after surgery, and had stopped pain medications by 12 months postoperatively. No patient suffered from tumor recurrence or spinal deformity. Conclusions: Minimally invasive surgery is feasible for total removal of selected benign vertebral tumors and may have some advantages over conventional surgical techniques.

Improvement following minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients 80 years or older compared with younger age groups

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive lumbar decompression in patients ≥ 80 years of age and compare them with those of younger age groups.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent primary unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) (any number of levels) and had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were included and divided into three groups by age: < 60 years, 60-79 years, and ≥ 80 years. The outcome measures were 1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (visual analog scale [VAS] back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-12] Physical Component Summary [PCS] and Mental Component Summary [MCS] scores, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function [PROMIS PF]); 2) percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the time taken to do so; and 3) complications and reoperations. Two postoperative time points were defined: early (< 6 months) and late (≥ 6 months).

RESULTS

A total of 345 patients (< 60 years: n = 94; 60-79 years: n = 208; ≥ 80 years: n = 43) were included in this study. The groups had significantly different average BMIs (least in patients aged ≥ 80 years), age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Indices (greatest in the ≥ 80-year age group), and operative times (greatest in 60- to 79-year age group). There was no difference in sex, number of operated levels, and estimated blood loss between groups. Compared with the preoperative values, the < 60-year and 60- to 79-year age groups showed a significant improvement in most PROMs at both the early and late time points. In contrast, the ≥ 80-year age group only showed significant improvement in PROMs at the late time point. Although there were significant differences between the groups in the magnitude of improvement (least improvement in ≥ 80-year age group) at the early time point in VAS back and leg, ODI, and SF-12 MCS, no significant difference was seen at the late time point except in ODI (least improvement in ≥ 80-year group). The overall MCID achievement rate decreased, moving from the < 60-year age group toward the ≥ 80-year age group at both the early (64% vs 51% vs 41% ) and late (72% vs 58% vs 52%) time points. The average time needed to achieve the MCID in pain and disability increased, moving from the < 60-year age group toward the ≥ 80-year age group (2 vs 3 vs 4 months). There was no significant difference seen between the groups in terms of complications and reoperations except in immediate postoperative complications (5.3% vs 4.8% vs 14%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although in this study minimally invasive decompression led to less and slower improvement in patients ≥ 80 years of age compared with their younger counterparts, there was significant improvement compared with the preoperative baseline.

Age-related Differences in Clinical Outcomes of Lumbar Discectomy

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar discectomy is a common and effective treatment for symptomatic disk herniation. It has been suggested that lumbar discectomy in older patients may result in poorer clinical outcomes and lesser satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to assess age-related difference in patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing lumbar discectomy for chronic low back and radicular pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with chronic lumbar radiculopathy without neurological deficit underwent non-urgent single level lumbar discectomy in our institution between 2014 and 2017. Pain level (using VAS score), Oswestry Disability Index, and SF-12 scores were retrospectively reviewed and compared between younger patients (<60 years, group 1) and older patients (>60 years, group 2).

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients, aged between 34-76 years participated in this study. VAS, ODI, and SF-12 scores improved significantly after the surgery for each group (P < .01). When comparing between the groups, no significant differences in the outcomes measured were found after the surgery in both early post-operative follow-up and late post-operative follow-up (P > .05).

DISCUSSION

Elderly patients undergoing lumbar discectomy report a significant reduction in VAS, ODI, and SF-12 scores justifying the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar discectomy improved function and decreased pain level to similar extent in both younger and older patients suffering from radicular symptoms related to lumbar disc herniation.

Stable Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Does Not Compromise Clinical Outcome of Minimally Invasive Tubular Decompression in Patients with Spinal Stenosis

Background and Objectives: In recent literature, the routine addition of arthrodesis to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with concomitant stable low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcome, complication and re-operation rates following minimally invasive (MIS) tubular decompression without arthrodesis in patients suffering from LSS with or without concomitant stable low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Ninety-six consecutive patients who underwent elective MIS lumbar decompression with a mean follow-up of 27.5 months were included in the study. The spondylolisthesis (S) group comprised 53 patients who suffered from LSS with stable degenerative spondylolisthesis, and the control (N) group included 43 patients suffering from LSS without spondylolisthesis. Outcome measures included complications and revision surgery rates. Pre- and post-operative visual analog scale (VAS) for both back and leg pain was analyzed, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to evaluate functional outcome. Results: The two groups were comparable in most demographic and preoperative variables. VAS for back and leg pain improved significantly following surgery in both groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in their ODI scores, at one and two years postoperatively. The average length of hospital stay was significantly higher in patients with spondylolisthesis (p-value< 0.01). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of post-operative complications rates or re-operation rates. Conclusions: Our results indicate that MIS tubular decompression may be an effective and safe procedure for patients suffering from LSS, with or without degenerative stable spondylolisthesis.

Elderly as a Predictor for Perioperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Multilevel Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Regression Modeling Study

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-institute retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To describe perioperative and postoperative complications in elderly who underwent multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) while identifying predictors of complications.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The number of elderly patients undergoing spinal fusion is rising. Spinal surgery in the elderly is considered high risk with high rates of complications. Perioperative and postoperative complications in elderly undergoing multilevel MIS TLIF is, however, not known.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 467 consecutive patients who underwent multilevel MIS TLIF at a single institution from 2013 to 2017. Two cohorts, 70 years or older and 50 to 69 years old were analyzed. Multiple logistic regressions with minor and major complication rates as the dependent variables were performed to identify predictors of complication based on previously cited risk factors. A p-value of 0.008 or less was considered significant.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two elderly and 315 nonelderly patients underwent multilevel MIS TLIFs. The average age was 76.4 and 60.4 years for the elderly and nonelderly cohorts. We observed 13 major (8.44%) and 72 minor (47.4%) complications in the elderly. No difference was noted in complication rates between the cohorts, except for urinary tract infection (P = .004) and urinary retention (P = .014). There were no myocardial infarctions; hardware complications; visceral, vascular, and neural injuries; or death. Length of stay, comorbidity, and length of surgery were predictive of major and minor complications.

CONCLUSION

Elderly may undergo multilevel MIS TLIF with comparable complication rates. Age was not a predictor of complications. Rather, attention should focus on evaluation of comorbidity and limiting operative times.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Complications of Spine Surgery in Elderly Japanese Patients: Implications for Future of World Population Aging

Objective

To analyze the relationship between age and perioperative complications of spine surgery in a Japanese cohort with the longest average life expectancy in the world.

Methods

Patients with spinal stenosis who underwent standard spine surgery without instrumented fusion were divided into 4 groups: adults (20–64 years), the young-old (65–74), the middle old (75–84), and the oldest-old (≥85). Data on medical complications, surgical complications, and deaths within 30 days of index surgery were compared across the groups. Risk factors for complications were identified through multivariate analysis.

Results

A total of 584 patients underwent 673 operations: 35% were performed on adult patients, 33% on the young-old, 27% on the middle old, and 5% on the oldest-old. The rates of total or [major] medical complications significantly increased with age (8% [0.8%], 11% [0.9%], 27% [3.9%], 45% [9.1%], respectively; p<0.001 [p=0.003]), whereas those of surgical complications did not differ (11%, 8.1%, 14%, 9.1%, respectively; p=0.25). Independent risk factors for medical complications were an age of 75 years or older (75–84: odds ratio [OR], 5.1; ≥85: OR, 6.2) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification III (OR, 5.4). Two patients older than 85 years died from medical complications.

Conclusion

The complications of spine surgery increased in the middle and oldest-old patients because of medical complications; however, most were minor and treatable. Major complications were associated with preoperative medical comorbidities and their severities; therefore, most elderly patients with low ASA physical status classification (≤II) may benefit from spine surgery.

Differences in clinical outcomes and health care utilization between octogenarians and nonagenarians following decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. A market scan analysis

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in octogenarians and beyond has a significant impact on quality of life requiring surgical decompression and hence impact on health care utilization. Risk of surgical failure and impact on health care resources is always a concern in this patient population (more so in nonagenarians). The aim of our study was to compare clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization in patients (80-89 vs.90+) undergoing decompression for LSS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data was extracted using ICD9/10 and CPT codes from MarketScan (2001-2015) in this retrospective study. We defined the comparative groups based on the age groups (80-89 and 90+), in patients with LSS. Outcomes of interest were: length of hospital stay, discharge disposition and utilization in the index hospitalization, 6- months, 12 months following index procedure as well as the associated health care utilization. Patient characteristics and outcomes among cohorts were compared using univariate tests. Outcomes were further compared using adjusted multivariable regression models. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.4.

RESULTS

A cohort of 5387 was identified from the database, 96.38% were in the 80-89 age group and 3.62%were in the 90+ age group. The proportion of patients undergoing surgery for LSS among 80-89 (95.7-98.5%) and 90+ age group (1.5-4.3%) remained constant through the years. Interestingly, 13.83% and 16.92% of patients had Elixhauser comorbidity index of 3+ in 80-89 age group and 90+ age groups respectively. Decompression with fusion was performed in 19.4% of patients in 80-89 age group, compared to 9.74% of patients in 90+ age group. There was no difference in median length of hospital stay (3 days, p = 0.19) and complications across the cohorts (80-89: 16.7%; 90+: 18.46% p = 0.51). 70.6% of patients in 80-89 age groups were discharged to home compared to 60.5% in 90+ age group (p = 0.0023). At 6 months follow-up, overall rate of new decompression, new fusion, re-fusion at index level were 2.38%, 0.59% and 0.33% only, with no differences across the cohorts. Interestingly, patients in 80-89 age group incurred higher outpatient services, number of medication refills and related payments at 6-months and 12-months follow-up, compared to patients in 90+ age group. Overall, combined median post-discharge payments at 12 months were similar across the groups [80-89 (median $ 40,257) and 90+ (median$ 36,161), p = 0.14].

CONCLUSION

Using MarketScan database, there has been a gradual decline in the number of decompressions being performed for LSS in elderly patients (>80 years of age), however there is no change in the proportion of octogenarians and nonagenarians undergoing decompression for LSS. There was no difference in rate of reoperations and overall health care utilization among the groups. Surgery for LSS can be offered to nonagenarians (in appropriately selected patients) with no difference in clinical outcomes and health care utilization, compared to octogenarians.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison Study Based on End Plate Subsidence and Cystic Change in Individuals Older and Younger than 65 Years

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes between patients older and younger than 65 years who underwent single-level minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) surgery.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of 76 patients who underwent MI-TLIF between April 2012 and June 2016. Group A consisted of 35 patients (<65 years) and group B consisted of 41 patients (≥65 years). Intraoperative data were recorded. The evaluation of clinical outcomes was based on the visual analog scale for back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index. Radiologic outcomes including cage subsidence, end plate cyst formation, and fusion rate were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study subjects was 65.3 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 18.98 months. Group B had a higher rate of comorbidities compared with group A (90.24% vs. 57.14%, respectively; P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complications between the groups (group A, 14.29%; group B, 17.07%). Clinical outcomes significantly improved in both groups postoperatively (P < 0.05). Although bony fusion in group A was slightly higher than that in group B, the fusion rate was not statistically different according to age. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of cage subsidence or positive cyst sign between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MI-TLIF presented similar safeness and acceptable outcomes and complication rate in both groups. Cyst formation may be aggravated by cage subsidence, because cage subsidence was a useful potential predictor of cyst formation.

National trends following decompression, discectomy, and fusion in octogenarians and nonagenarians

BACKGROUND

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database is used to evaluate a wide variety of surgical procedures across a range of specialties. The authors of this study assess national trends of the three commonest spine procedures performed (decompression, fusion, and discectomy) in patients between the ages of 80 and 100 years (octogenarians and nonagenarians).

METHODS

The NIS database was queried to identify patients between the ages of 80 and 100 with a primary diagnosis of spinal stenosis, disk herniation without myelopathy, or protrusion due to degeneration of spine/disk disorders and who have undergone spinal decompression, fusion, or discectomy between the years 1998 and 2011. Variables of concern included length-of-stay (LOS), non-routine discharge, average total charges, in-hospital complications, and mortality rate.

RESULTS

Decompression was the most common procedure performed (n = 113,267, 50.5%). Fusion (n = 60,345, 26.9%) was associated with the longest LOS (5.1 days), highest in-hospital complication and mortality rates (n = 13,170, 21.8% and n = 449, 0.7%, respectively), most non-routine discharges (n = 42,662, 70.7%), and highest mean for average total charges ($69,295) (p < 0.001). Discectomy (n = 50,740, 22.6%), had the shortest LOS (3.7 days), lowest complication and mortality rates (n = 6823, 13.4% and n = 102, 0.2%, respectively), fewest non-routine discharges (n = 22,861, 45.1%), and lowest mean for average total charges ($22,787) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Decompression was most common. Fusion had the longest LOS, highest complication and mortality rates, most non-routine discharges, and was most expensive. Discectomy was least commonly performed, had the shortest LOS, lowest complication and mortality rates, fewest non-routine discharges, and was least expensive.

Surgical Outcome of Two-Level Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Far-Migrated Disc Herniation

Objective. To describe the two-level percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) technique in transforaminal approach for highly migrated disc herniation and investigate its clinical outcomes. Methods. A total of 22 consecutive patients with highly migrated lumbar disc herniation were enrolled for the study from June 2012 to February 2014. Results. There were 12 males and 10 females, with a mean age of 41.1 (range 23–67) years. The mean follow-up period was 18.05 (range 14–33) months. According to the modified MacNab criteria, the clinical outcome at the final follow-up was excellent in 14, good in 6, and fair in 2 patients and the satisfactory rate (excellent and good) was 90.9%. The improvements in VAS and ODI were statistically significant. One patient had recurrent herniation in 18 months after the first surgery and underwent open discectomy. One patient showed symptoms of postoperative dysesthesia (POD), but the POD symptom was transient and partial remission was achieved in two months after conservative treatment. Conclusion. Two-level PELD in transforaminal approach can be a safe and effective procedure for highly migrated disc herniation.

Percutaneous thoracolumbar decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and fusion: a method for treating spinal degenerative pain in a biplane angiography suite with the avoidance of general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Spondylytic degeneration of the axial lumbar spine is a major cause of pain and disability. Recent advances in spinal surgical instrumentation, including percutaneous access and fusion techniques, have made possible the performance of instrumented fusion through small incisions. By blending strategies of interventional pain management, neuroradiology, and conventional spine surgery, it is now feasible to treat spinal axial pain using permanent fixation techniques and local anesthesia in the setting of a fluoroscopy suite using mild sedation and local anesthesia.

METHODS

The author presents a series of percutaneous thoracolumbar fusion procedures performed in a biplane neuroangiographic suite and without general anesthesia for the treatment of spondylytic pain. All procedures utilized pedicle screw fixation, harvesting of local bone autograft, and application of bone fusion material.

RESULTS

In this series of 13 patients, a statistically significant reduction of pain was seen at both the 2-week post-operative timepoint, as well as at the time of longest follow-up (mean 40 weeks).

DISCUSSION

The advanced and rapid imaging capabilities afforded by a neuroangiographic suite can be safely combined with percutaneous fusion techniques so as to allow for fusion therapies to be applied to patients where the avoidance of general anesthesia is desirable.