Therapeutic Failure in Trigeminal Neuralgia: from a Clarification of Trigeminal Nerve Somatotopy to a Targeted Partial Sensory Rhizotomy

Partial sensory rhizotomy in recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. Our experience and literature review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Trigeminal Neuralgia (NT) is a common pathology in Neurosurgery. It can be classified as idiopathic or secondary to other pathologies, such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Several surgical treatments have been described, some of them being replaced by more modern techniques. Partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR), described by Dandy is a technique replaced by other techniques due to its permanent side effects. We present our experience with this technique in patients with recurrent NT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review is carried out on five patients who underwent surgery at our center from 2018 to 2023 using the PSR technique.

RESULTS

All the patients intervened showed significant clinical improvement, except one patient who required reintervention due to uncontrolled pain. According to the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) scale, 80% (4/5) of patients showed improvement from grade V to grades I/II except for one of them. This patient suffered from MS. Additionally, one patient presented a corneal ulcer after surgery due to impairment of the corneal reflex.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, PSR is a valid treatment option in selected patients with recurrent TN. It has a low incidence of complications with an adequate surgical technique and anatomical knowledge of the region. To the best of our knowledge, we are one of the few centers in Spain to publish our results with PSR in the last ten years. We report good results in pain control withdrawing medication in 80% (4/5) of the operated patients.

Efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression with or without partial sensory rhizotomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review in treating trigeminal neuralgia

Classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN), caused by vascular compression of the nerve root, is a severe cause of pain with a considerable impact on a patient's quality of life. While microvascular decompression (MVD) has lower recurrence rates when compared with partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) alone, refractoriness can still be as high as 47%. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of MVD + PSR when compared to standalone MVD for TN. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 patients, in English, published between January 1980 and December 2023, comparing MVD vs. MVD + PSR for TN. Endpoints were pain cure, immediate post-operative pain improvement, long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, and complications (facial numbness, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding). We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals with a random-effects model. I2 was used to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and Baujat analysis were conducted to address high heterogeneity. Eight studies were included, comprising a total of 1,338 patients, of whom 1,011 were treated with MVD and 327 with MVD + PSR. Pain cure analysis revealed a lower likelihood of pain cure in patients treated with MVD when compared to patients treated with MVD + PSR (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.72). Immediate postoperative pain improvement assessment revealed a lower likelihood of improvement in the MVD group when compared with the MVD + PSR group (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.95). Facial numbness assessment revealed a lower likelihood of occurrence in MVD alone when compared to MVD + PSR (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.15). Long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding analyses revealed no difference between both approaches. Our meta-analysis identified that MVD + PSR was superior to MVD for pain cure and immediate postoperative pain improvement for treating TN. However, MVD + PSR demonstrated a higher likelihood of facial numbness complications. Furthermore, identified that hearing loss and intracranial bleeding complications appear comparable between the two treatments, and no difference between long-term effectiveness and recurrence.

Intraoperative Mapping of the Sensory Root of the Trigeminal Nerve in Patients with Pontocerebellar Angle Pathology

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to determine the position of the 3 sensory branches of the trigeminal nerve in the preganglionic tract using intraoperative neurophysiological mapping.

METHODS

We included consecutive adult patients who underwent neurosurgical treatment of cerebellopontine angle lesions. The trigeminal nerve was antidromically stimulated at 3 sites along its circumference with different stimulus intensities at a distance of ≤1 cm from the brainstem. The sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were recorded from each main trigeminal branch (V1 [ophthalmic branch], V2 [maxillary branch], and V3 [mandibular branch]).

RESULTS

We analyzed 13 patients. The stimulation points at which we obtained the greatest number of congruous and exclusive SNAPs (SNAPs only on the stimulated branch) was the stimulation point for V3 (20.7%). The stimulation intensity at which we obtained the highest number of congruent and exclusive SNAPs with the stimulated branch was 0.5 mA.

CONCLUSIONS

Using our recording conditions, trigeminal stimulation is a reliable technique for mapping the V3 and V1 branches using an intensity not exceeding 0.5. However, reliable identification of the fibers of V2 is more difficult. Stimulation of the trigeminal nerve can be a reliable technique to identify the V3 and V1 branches if rhizotomy of these branches is necessary.

Surgical treatment for Trigeminal neuralgia

Various treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) are known to yield initial satisfactory results; however, the surgical treatment has excellent long-term outcomes and a low recurrence rate. Surgical treatment addresses the challenge of vascular compression, which accounts for 85% of the causes of TN. As for surgical treatment for TN, microvascular decompression (MVD) has become the surgical treatment of choice after Peter J. Jannetta reported the results of MVD surgery in 1996. Since then, many studies have reported a success rate of over 90% for the initial surgical treatment. Most MVDs aim to separate (decompress) the culprit vessel from the trigeminal nerve. To increase the success rate of surgery, accurate indications for MVD and management of the offender vessels without complications are critical. In addition, if there is no vascular compression, partial sensory rhizotomy or internal neurolysis can be performed to improve surgical outcomes.

Intracranial nociception

Understanding intracranial nociceptive innervation is essential to understand the pathophysiology of headaches. Our knowledge about human intracranial nociception comes from sparse observations during neurosurgical procedures performed in awake patients, from human anatomical studies and from experimental studies in animals. In this article we review the anatomical and functional organization underlying nociceptive innervation. Intracranial nociception is mainly mediated by the trigeminal system, except in the posterior cranial fossa that is innervated by the first cervical roots. For decades, the dura mater, its vessels and major cerebral blood vessels were considered as the only intracranial pain-sensitive structures. Recent animal and human studies have suggested that smaller brain arteries and potentially pia mater might also be pain sensitive. Nociceptive neurons innervating intracranial blood vessels project via the ophthalmic division (V1) to the trigeminal ganglion and store several neurotransmitters including glutamate, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The trigeminal ganglion, root and brainstem nuclei have a specific topographic and functional somatotopy. Progressive transition between the trigeminal spinal nucleus and the dorsal horn of the cervical spinal cord, and convergence of nociceptive inputs from the face, intracranial structures and the occipital area on the so-called "trigemino-cervical complex" may explain some headache features, relations between facial and occipital pain, and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation in headache. The specific anatomic organization of the trigeminal system, from the primary-order neuron in the trigeminal ganglion, to the second-order neuron is the trigeminal nuclei, may explain a part of the various characteristics of headaches.

Value of Partial Sensory Rhizotomy in the Microsurgical Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia Through Retrosigmoid Approach

Purpose

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the most effective surgical procedure for the treatment of refractory primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN), but due to the presence of non-neurovascular compression (NVC), the application of MVD is limited. In some cases, partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) is required. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of MVD and MVD+PSR in the treatment of primary TN and to evaluate the application value of PSR in the treatment of TN.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the postoperative outcomes of patients who received MVD or MVD+PSR for the first time from the same surgeon in the neurosurgery department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital from March 2009 to December 2017. A total of 105 patients were included in the data analysis, including 40 in the MVD group and 65 in the MVD+PSR group.

Results

The MVD group had an effectiveness rate of 60% and a recurrence rate of 31.4% after an average follow-up of 49.4 months. The MVD+PSR group had an average effectiveness rate of 69.2% and a recurrence rate of 28.6% after an average follow-up of 71.4 months. There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in long-term effectiveness (p=0.333) or recurrence rates (p=0.819). The incidence of facial numbness was significantly higher in the MVD+PSR group than in the MVD group (83.1% vs 7.5%; p<0.001). However, facial numbness had no significant effect on the patients’ daily life.

Conclusion

MVD+PSR and MVD have the same effectiveness in the treatment of primary TN. MVD+PSR is associated with a higher incidence of facial numbness than MVD, but the difference does not affect the patients’ daily life. PSR should have a place in the treatment of TN by posterior fossa microsurgery.

Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures

BACKGROUND

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a painful disorder characterized by sudden electric shock-like pain. It is a rare condition for which multiple treatments are available, including medical and surgical. The best treatment option is yet to be defined, and this is related to the lack of definition in the treatment outcomes and outcome measures. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize all the outcomes and outcomes measures that have been published to date and highlight variability in their use.

METHODS

We have conducted a literature search using a wide range of databases (1946-2019 for medical and 2008-2019 for surgical treatment), for all intervention studies in TN. Four hundred and sixty-seven studies were selected for data extraction on TN classification, data collection method, intervention, and treatment outcomes mapped to the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT guidelines).

RESULTS

Most studies collected data on pain (n = 459) and side effects (n = 386) domains; however, very few collected data on the impact of treatment on physical (n = 46) and emotional functioning (n = 17) and on patient satisfaction (n = 35). There was high variability on outcome measures used for pain relief (n = 10), pain intensity (n = 9), and frequency of pain episodes (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

A clear definition of what are the important outcomes for patients with TN is essential. The choice of standardized outcome measures allowing for consistent reporting in TN treatment will allow for comparison of studies and facilitate treatment choice for patients and clinicians thus, improving health outcomes and reducing health care cost.

Topography of the pain in classical trigeminal neuralgia: insights into somatotopic organization

Trigeminal neuralgia is defined by its clinical characteristics of paroxysmal unilateral facial pain in a well-defined territory. Distribution of the pain may be in one or several of the cutaneous and/or mucous territories of the three divisions with V2 pain being the most frequent territory followed by V3 and V1. Factors determining the distribution of pain have not yet been systematically investigated. It is now well recognized that vascular compression factor is a predominant aetiology of classical trigeminal neuralgia. In this study we aimed to find whether there is a relation between the location of the vascular compression and the peripheral distribution of the pain. Patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia in whom microvascular decompression was performed were included. Data recorded pertained to the nature of the conflict, its degree and, most importantly, location around the root: supero-median, supero-lateral or inferior. Equally, clinical data for the distribution of pain were recorded. Most of the patients 318 (89.3%) had the compression coming from above, i.e. 220 (61.7%) had compression from a supero-medial direction and 98 (27.5%) from a supero-lateral direction; inferior compression was present in 38 patients (10.7%). Distribution of the pain was significantly different according to the location of the conflict (P = 0.0005, Fisher Exact test). Odds ratios were computed for each location of compression and painful territory involved. According to the overall distribution of pain, patients with supero-medial compression had an odds ratio of 2.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66–4.41] of manifesting with V1 pain. Conversely V3 pain was less likely to occur with supero-median compression than the other types of pain (odds ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.34–0.83). Inferior compression on the other hand was more likely to manifest with V3 pain with an odds ratio of 2.56 (95% CI 1.21–5.45). Overall V2 pain had an odds ratio close to 1 regardless of the type of compression. These findings suggest an association between the location of the neurovascular conflict with its resulting insult and the distribution of pain supporting a somatotopic view of the organization of the trigeminal root and a role of the conflict in the clinical manifestation of trigeminal neuralgia.