Medical Nutrition Therapy Access in CKD: A Cross-sectional Survey of Patients and Providers

Home-Delivered Medically Tailored Meal Engagement Among Hemodialysis Patients and Providers

OBJECTIVE

Hemodialysis patients face one of the most difficult diets among clinical patient populations. Furthermore, dialysis dietary adherence is generally reported as low with providers generally lacking the time and resources to implement effective behavior change. The purpose of this study was to elucidate measures of patient and provider engagement with home-delivered medically tailored meals (MTMs).

METHODS

We surveyed patients and staff at dialysis centers within the Denver metropolitan area. Surveys focused on 1) patient dietary intake, 2) awareness, support, and utilization of meal programs, and 3) nutritional challenges and barriers (including food security).

RESULTS

We surveyed 118 patients (mean age 61.0 ± 14.2 year, 58.5% male, and dialysis vintage of 4.6 ± 4.9 years) and 26 staff across the included dialysis facilities. Patients were 20.3% White/Non-Hispanic, 35.6% Hispanic/Latin, and 31.4% Black/African American. Most patients reported eating 2 meals per day (N = 53, 44.9%) and 52.2% reported difficulty with following a kidney diet. The most cited reasons for not following the diet were behavioral or knowledge (38.5%), taste (26.3%), time/convenience (26.9%) and food autonomy (16.9%). Sixty participants (52.2%) reported living in a food desert and 26.3% reported food insecurity. Seventy-one patients (61.2%) were aware of MTMs but only 40.5% had been referred. Most (76.9%) dialysis providers were aware of MTMs but only 15 (57.7%) had actually referred patients to such a service. Black individuals were less likely to be referred for MTMs than White or Hispanics/Latin (29.7% vs 48.1% White and 45.0% Hispanic/Latin) individuals.

CONCLUSION

Medically tailored meals (MTMs) represent a potential method to alleviate or bypass some of the many barriers expressed by patients. Our findings reveal a critical need for education around MTMs for both patients and providers. Medically tailored meals (MTMs) could potentially demonstrate health kidney dietary patterns that might translate to altered dietary preferences or toward future behavior change.

Correlation of the Dietary Protein Intake between Those Estimated from a Short Protein Food-Recall Questionnaire and from 24-Hour Urinary Urea-Nitrogen Excretion in Stages 3-4 Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Introduction

High protein intake may accelerate progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Estimation of dietary protein intake (DPI) is indispensable for management of CKD, but to achieve optimum DPI is quite challenging in routine clinical practice. We recently studied a beneficial effect of utilizing integrated care on the management of CKD at the rural community level. In that study, we created a short protein food-recall questionnaire (S-PFRQ) as a working tool to estimate DPI of the CKD patients during home visit by community health personnel. Herein, we reported the initial evaluation of the reliability of S-PFRQ from our previous study.

Objective

We compared the amount of DPI obtained from S-PFRQ with that obtained from protein-equivalent of total nitrogen appearance (PNA).

Methods

In the previous ESCORT-2 study, 914 patients with CKD stage 3 or 4, who were living in the rural area of Thailand, were prospectively followed while receiving integrated care for 36 consecutive months. During home visits by community nurses from subdistrict health centers, dietary food recall was made, recorded in S-PFRQ, and DPI was obtained. Among these, sixty patients were randomly selected, and 24-h urine was collected for urinary urea-N and estimation of PNA. A correlation was made between DPI obtained from S-PFRQ and PNA.

Results

The DPIs derived from S-PFRQ and PNA were 28.8 ± 14.8 and 39.26 ± 17.79 g/day, respectively. The mean difference and 95% CI between the 2 methods was -10.43 (-7.1 to -13.8) g/day, respectively (P < 0.001). Interclass correlation between these 2 methods was 0.24, P = 0.007. The difference between the 2 methods remained constant across different amounts of DPI.

Conclusion

The DPI estimated from S-PFRQ significantly correlated to that from PNA. However, the S-PFRQ method yielded a DPI value which was about 10 g of protein or 25% less than the PNA method. Despite this amount of difference, this S-PFRQ is user-friendly and could be used during field work as an easy and simple tool for DPI estimation in resource-limiting condition.

Medical Nutrition Therapy for Chronic Kidney Disease: Low Access and Utilization

CKD affects approximately half of US adults aged 65 years and older and accounts for almost 1 out of every 4 dollars of total Medicare fee-for-service spending. Efforts to prevent or slow CKD progression are urgently needed to reduce the incidence of kidney failure and reduce health care expenditures. Current CKD care guidelines recommend medical nutrition therapy (MNT), a personalized, evidence-based application of the Nutrition Care Process (assessment, intervention, diagnosis, and monitoring and evaluation) provided by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) to help slow CKD progression, improve quality of life, and delay kidney failure. MNT is covered by Medicare Part B and most private insurances with no cost sharing. Despite recommendations that patients with CKD receive MNT and insurance coverage for MNT, utilization remains low. This article demonstrates low utilization of MNT and inadequate numbers of RDNs and RDNs who are board certified in renal nutrition relative to the estimated number of Medicare eligible adults with self-reported diagnosed CKD by state, with noted disparities across states. We discuss interventions to increase MNT utilization, such as improving MNT reimbursement, augmenting accessibility of RDNs via telenutrition services and increasing health care provider promotion of MNT and referral to MNT to optimize CKD outcomes.

Nutritional and Dietary Management of Chronic Kidney Disease Under Conservative and Preservative Kidney Care Without Dialysis

While dialysis has been the prevailing treatment paradigm for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), emphasis on conservative and preservative management in which dietary interventions are a major cornerstone have emerged. Based on high-quality evidence, international guidelines support the utilization of low-protein diets as an intervention to reduce CKD progression and mortality risk, although the precise thresholds (if any) for dietary protein intake vary across recommendations. There is also increasing evidence demonstrating that plant-dominant low-protein diets reduce the risk of developing incident CKD, CKD progression, and its related complications including cardiometabolic disease, metabolic acidosis, mineral and bone disorders, and uremic toxin generation. In this review, we discuss the premise for conservative and preservative dietary interventions, specific dietary approaches used in conservative and preservative care, potential benefits of a plant-dominant low-protein diet, and practical implementation of these nutritional strategies without dialysis.

Food Insecurity and Chronic Kidney Disease: Considerations for Practitioners

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has exacerbated existing health disparities related to food security status. Emerging literature suggests individuals with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) who are also food insecure have a greater likelihood of disease progression compared to food secure individuals. However, the complex relationship between CKD and food insecurity (FI) is understudied relative to other chronic conditions. The purpose of this practical application article is to summarize the recent literature on the social-economic, nutritional, to care through which FI may negatively impact health outcomes in individuals with CKD. While several studies have reported on the cross-sectional prevalence of FI among persons with CKD, literature is lacking about the severity and duration of exposure to FI on CKD outcomes. Future research is needed to better understand how FI impairs CKD care, nutritional and structural barriers that impact disease prevention and disease progression, and effective strategies to support patients.

Patient Perception of Plant Based Diets for Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVE

Plant-based diets can delay the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and help manage complications and comorbid conditions such as hypertension, acidosis, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study was to understand nephrology patients' familiarity, perception, and use of plant-based diets.

DESIGN & METHODS

A survey was shared via the National Kidney Foundation's social media channels. Analysis included 844 responses. Survey items were evaluated with descriptive statistics. Differences across items were determined using chi-square tests.

RESULTS

Most respondents were 61-70 years of age (26.7%, n = 225), female (56.5%, n = 477) and achieved a Bachelor's or advanced degree (49.9%, n = 421). The majority of respondents suffered from nondialysis-dependent CKD (34%) or received a kidney transplant (34%). About half (45%) of respondents were familiar with plant-based diets and most (58%) were aware that plant-based diets can improve CKD. Twenty-two percent reported following some version of a vegetarian diet, and 29% reported "eating less meat". Respondents were not confident (Mdn = 2, IQR = 2, on a scale of 1-5) in their ability to plan a balanced plant-based meal, and were moderately confident that a plant-based diet could help blood pressure (Mdn = 3, IQR = 2) and slow progression of CKD (Mdn = 3, IGR = 2). Family eating preference, meal planning skills, preference for meat, figuring out what is healthy to eat, food cost, time constraints, and ease of cooking were rated as equal barriers to following a plant-based diet (Mdn = 3). A sample meal plan, individual counseling session with a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN), handouts, and cooking classes were resources rated most helpful to transition to a plant-based diet (Mdn = 4).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of respondents were aware that plant-based diets can be beneficial for CKD. Many patients are following a vegetarian or plant-based eating pattern. More research should be done to see how effective RDNs are in educating and moving patients toward a plant-based eating pattern, as they are an underutilized resource in the CKD population.

A quasi-experimental study provides evidence that registered dietitian nutritionist care is aligned with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics evidence-based nutrition practice guidelines for type 1 and 2 diabetes

Background

One previous study examined implementation of evidence-based nutrition practice guidelines (EBNPG).

Objectives

To describe alignment of registered dietitian nutritionists' (RDNs) documented nutrition care with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' EBNPG for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes and examine impact of a midpoint training on care alignment with the guideline.

Methods

In this 2-year, quasi-experimental study, 19 RDNs providing outpatient medical nutrition therapy to adults with diabetes (n = 562) documented 787 initial and follow-up encounters. At study midpoint, RDNs received a guideline content training. A validated, automated tool was used to match standardized nutrition care process terminology (NCPT) in the documentation to NCPT expected to represent guideline implementation. A congruence score ranging from 0 (recommendation not identified) to 4 (recommendation fully implemented) was generated based on matching. Multilevel linear regression was used to examine pre-to-post training changes in congruence scores.

Results

Most patients (~75%) had only one documented RDN encounter. At least one guideline recommendation was fully implemented in 67% of encounters. The recommendations “individualize macronutrient composition” and “education on glucose monitoring” (partially or fully implemented in 85 and 79% of encounters, respectively) were most frequently implemented. The mean encounter congruence scores were not different from pre-to-post guideline training (n = 19 RDNs, 519 encounters pre-training; n = 14 RDNs, 204 encounters post-training; β = −0.06, SE = 0.04; 95% CI: −0.14, 0.03).

Conclusions

Most RDN encounters had documented evidence that at least one recommendation from the EBNPG was implemented. The most frequently implemented recommendations were related to improving glycemic control. A midpoint guideline training had no impact on alignment of care with the guideline.

Research at the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: What, How, and Why?

Research is essential to further advance our understanding of the role of nutrition and dietetics in maintenance and improvement of health. Research is also essential for nutrition and dietetics professionals to create and provide evidence-based interventions, including medical nutrition therapy (MNT) provided by registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs). Given this critical role of research, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) has a variety of resources to assist its members in accessing, understanding, participating in, conducting, and disseminating nutrition research. These resources are comprehensive and include opportunities to participate in research (e.g., Nutrition Research Network (NRN) and Data Science Center (DSC)), tools to aggregate practice data (Nutrition Care Process and Terminology (NCPT) and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Informatics Infrastructure (ANDHII)), funding opportunities to support primary research (e.g., Academy Foundation), resources to understand the latest research informing evidence-based practice (EBP) (e.g., Evidence Analysis Center (EAC)), and avenues for sharing research findings (e.g., Food and Nutrition Conference and Expo (FNCE)). The aim of this paper is to encourage members to get involved in research by describing Academy-based research resources and opportunities to contribute to nutrition and dietetics research, as well as describe specific examples of research conducted at Academy. The information presented can serve as a framework to guide members in engaging in research through the Academy.

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2021 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in CKD

The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) convened a work group to review the 2021 KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) guideline for the management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease (CKD). This commentary is the product of that work group and presents the recommendations and practice points from the KDIGO guideline in the context of US clinical practice. A critical addition to the KDIGO guideline is the recommendation for accurate assessment of blood pressure using standardized office blood pressure measurement. In the general adult population with CKD, KDIGO recommends a goal systolic blood pressure less than 120 mm Hg on the basis of results from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and secondary analyses of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) trial. The KDOQI work group agreed with most of the recommendations while highlighting the weak evidence base especially for patients with diabetes and advanced CKD.

Plant-based Diets in Kidney Disease: Nephrology Professionals' Perspective

OBJECTIVE

Plant-based diets can delay the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and help manage complications and co-morbid conditions such as hypertension, acidosis, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. However, it is unclear how often plant-based diets are recommended to patients with kidney disease. The objective of this study was to understand nephrology professionals' familiarity, perception, and recommendation of plant-based diets to people with kidney disease.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A survey to understand perception of recommendation of plant-based diets for patients with CKD was developed. Nephrology professionals from the National Kidney Foundation's member directory were e-mailed a link to complete the survey online. This directory includes professionals who work in a variety of nephrology settings, including both CKD and end-stage renal disease care. Survey items were evaluated with descriptive statistics. Differences across items were determined using chi-square tests and t-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 3,901 professionals were sent the survey, and 644 completed the survey. A majority were dietitians (58%) and worked in dialysis clinics (54%). Most (88%) had heard of using plant-based diets for kidney disease treatment, and a majority (88%) believed it could improve CKD management, cardiovascular disease (90%), hypertension (90%), diabetes (84%), high cholesterol (90%), and obesity (84%). Dietitians were more likely to report plant-based diets as beneficial for each health condition (P < .05). Professionals were most confident that a plant-based diet could help control hypertension (3.75 ± 0.99 on a scale of 1-5), compared with delaying progression of CKD (3.68 ± 1.15) or treating acidosis (3.68 ± 1.13). Dietitians felt more confident in their ability to plan a balanced plant-based diet compared with other specialties (3.49 vs. 2.74, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Nephrology professionals who work in nondialysis-dependent CKD settings, and those who work with patients on dialysis, are aware of the benefits of plant-based diets in kidney disease. However, plant-based diets are not routinely being offered as a treatment option. Nephrology practices should work to increase dietitian referrals to offer patients support in transitioning to a plant-based diet.

What are the information needs and concerns of individuals with Polycystic Kidney Disease? Results of an online survey using Facebook and social listening analysis

BACKGROUND

Polycystic Kidney Disease (PKD) is a hereditary disorder that has no cure and can result in end stage kidney failure. Searching for health information online and via social media is a common phenomenon in many medical conditions. However, no recent studies have documented the information needs, online behaviours, and concerns of people with PKD. The aim of this study was to explore the information needs of individuals with PKD and their carers by documenting (i) the information needs (ii) online information health seeking behaviours (iii) the perceived challenges of living with PKD and (iv) dietary concerns.

METHODS

A 17-item survey was constructed by undertaking a social listening analysis. This survey was then distributed via PKD related social media groups on Facebook. Seven groups distributed the survey with permission from the group owners. Open free text survey questions were analysed thematically using content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 536 respondents completed the online survey (70.9 % female, 77 % aged 35-70, 70.2 % diagnosed more than 10 years ago). The major information need expressed by participants with PKD was for dietary information. Information regarding medications, medical management and symptom control were also desired. The overarching themes arising from the free text responses to the major challenge of living with PKD included 'learning to navigate dietary ambiguities'; 'managing social, psychological and emotional needs'; and 'accepting an uncertain future'. In addition to a strong desire for practical and specific dietary information, participants expressed a need for more online information pertaining to management of fatigue, pain, complications and how to manage mental health. Online peer support was also highly regarded and desired.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides contemporary insights into the type of information desired by people with PKD. The results indicated that there was a strong desire for unambiguous information and guidance from health professionals to facilitate self-management, alleviate concerns, and address the complexities of living with Polycystic Kidney Disease. While diet is an important and frequently expressed need, there also remains a large demand for information on how to support psychological needs, and on medical management in order to support treatment decision making. Future work is required to develop specific, actionable and evidence-based resources for patients that are available online and through health professionals. Increased access to renal dietitians, peer support and additional training for health professionals could also improve patient-centered care and support self-management.