1
|
Wang Y, Yang Y, Liu QQ, Wang SZ. Compare clinical efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1845-1856. [PMID: 38983334 PMCID: PMC11230002 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in the treatment of middle and low locally advanced rectal cancer. Our study will systematically collect and integrate studies to evaluate the ability of these two treatments to improve tumor shrinkage rates, surgical resection rates, tumor-free survival, and severe adverse events. AIM To provide clinicians and patients with more reliable treatment options to optimize treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the two treatment options. METHODS A full search of all clinical studies on the effectiveness and safety of TNT and nCRT for treating locally advanced rectal cancer identified in Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature Database) and English (PubMed, Embase) databases was performed. Two system assessors independently screened the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality evaluation and data extraction were performed for the included literature. We used RevMan 5.3 software to perform a meta-analysis of the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, T stage degradation rate, resection 0 (R0) rate, anal grade 3/4 acute toxicity rate, perioperative complications, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in the TNT and nCRT groups. RESULTS Finally, 14 studies were included, six of which were randomized controlled studies. A total of 3797 patients were included, including 1865 in the TNT group and 1932 in the nCRT group. The two sets of baseline data were comparable. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the pCR rate [odds ratio (OR) = 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-1.90, P < 0.00001], T stage degradation rate (OR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.63-2.57, P < 0.00001), and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.42, 95%CI: 1.09-1.85, P = 0.009) were significantly greater in the nCRT group than in the nCRT group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 acute toxicity or perioperative complications between the two groups. The 5-year OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.69-1.02, P = 0.08] and DFS (HR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.03-1.39, P = 0.74) of the TNT group were similar to those of the nCRT group. CONCLUSION TNT has greater clinical efficacy and safety than nCRT in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Wang
- Department of Anus Intestinal Surgery, Feicheng People’s Hospital, Feicheng 271600, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yan Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Hospital of University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao 266011, Shandong Province, China
| | - Qi-Qi Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shao-Zhao Wang
- Department of Anorectal Words, Central Hospital Affiliated Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250013, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Torri GB, Wiethan CP, Langer FW, de Oliveira GS, Meirelles AVB, Horvat N, Tse JR, Dias AB, Altmayer S. Split scar sign to predict complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3874-3881. [PMID: 37979009 PMCID: PMC11166750 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10447-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the modality of choice for rectal cancer initial staging and restaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of the split scar sign (SSS) on rectal MRI in predicting complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant published studies through June 2023. Primary studies met eligibility criteria if they evaluated the diagnostic performance of the SSS to predict complete response on pathology or clinical follow-up in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the SSS. RESULTS A total of 4 studies comprising 377 patients met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of complete response in the studies was 21.7-52.5%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the SSS to predict complete response were 62.0% (95% CI, 43.5-78.5%) and 91.9% (95% CI, 78.9-97.2%), respectively. The estimated AUC for SSS was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.56-0.94) with a DOR of 18.8 (95% CI, 3.65-96.5). CONCLUSION The presence of SSS on rectal MRI demonstrated high specificity for complete response in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. This imaging pattern can be a valuable tool to identify potential candidates for organ-sparing treatment and surveillance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT SSS presents high specificity for complete response post-neoadjuvant. This MRI finding enhances rectal cancer treatment assessment and aids clinicians and patients in choosing watch-and-wait over immediate surgery, which can potentially reduce costs and associated morbidity. KEY POINTS •Fifteen to 50% of rectal cancer patients achieve complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and may be eligible for a watch-and-wait strategy. •The split scar sign has high specificity for a complete response. •This imaging finding is valuable to select candidates for organ-sparing management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Brondani Torri
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital of Santa Maria, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil
| | - Camila Piovesan Wiethan
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital of Santa Maria, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil
| | - Felipe Welter Langer
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital of Santa Maria, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, 97105-900, Brazil
| | | | - Alice Villa Bella Meirelles
- Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 110 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, 30130-100, Brazil
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Justin Ruey Tse
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305-5105, USA
| | - Adriano Basso Dias
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, 263 McCaul Street, 4Th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5T 1W7, Canada
| | - Stephan Altmayer
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305-5105, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Horvat N, Miranda J, Kinochita F, de Carvalho TL, Torri GB, Lopes TJP, Nomura CH. Restaging magnetic resonance imaging of the rectum after neoadjuvant therapy: a practical guide. Radiol Bras 2024; 57:e20240004. [PMID: 39050261 PMCID: PMC11268099 DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2024.0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Rectal cancer accounts for approximately one-third of new colorectal cancer cases, with adenocarcinoma as the predominant subtype. Despite an overall decline in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, due to advancements in screening, early diagnosis, and treatment options, there is a concerning increase in incidence rates among young patients. Recent significant advances in managing locally advanced rectal cancer, such as the establishment of different surgical approaches, neoadjuvant treatment using different protocols for high-risk cases, and the adoption of organ-preservation strategies, have increased the importance of the role played by radiologists in locoregional assessment on magnetic resonance imaging at baseline, at restaging, and during active surveillance of patients with rectal cancer. In this article, we review the role of restaging rectal magnetic resonance imaging after neoadjuvant therapy, providing radiologists with a practical, step-by-step guide for assessing treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,
New York, NY, USA
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP),
São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - João Miranda
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,
New York, NY, USA
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP),
São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Kinochita
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP),
São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Tiago Lins de Carvalho
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard
Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giovanni Brondani Torri
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Universidade
Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| | | | - Cesar Higa Nomura
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP),
São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês,
São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gollub MJ, Costello JR, Ernst RD, Lee S, Maheshwari E, Petkovska I, Wasnik AP, Horvat N. A primer on rectal MRI in patients on watch-and-wait treatment for rectal cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:2836-2873. [PMID: 37099182 PMCID: PMC11210452 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03900-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for rectal cancer is becoming an accepted treatment paradigm and is changing the landscape of this disease, wherein up to 50% of patients who undergo TNT are able to avoid surgery. This places new demands on the radiologist in terms of interpreting degrees of response to treatment. This primer summarizes the Watch-and-Wait approach and the role of imaging, with illustrative "atlas-like" examples as an educational guide for radiologists. We present a brief literature summary of the evolution of rectal cancer treatment, with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of response. We also discuss recommended guidelines and standards. We outline the common TNT approach entering mainstream practice. A heuristic and algorithmic approach to MRI interpretation is also offered. To illustrate management and common scenarios, we arranged the illustrative figures as follows: (I) Clinical complete response (cCR) achieved at the immediate post-TNT "decision point" scan time; (II) cCR achieved at some point during surveillance, later than the first post-TNT MRI; (III) near clinical complete response (nCR); (IV) incomplete clinical response (iCR); (V) discordant findings between MRI and endoscopy where MRI is falsely positive, even at follow-up; (VI) discordant cases where MRI seems to be falsely positive but is proven truly positive on follow-up endoscopy; (VII) cases where MRI is falsely negative; (VIII) regrowth of tumor in the primary tumor bed; (IX) regrowth outside the primary tumor bed; and (X) challenging scenarios, i.e., mucinous cases. This primer is offered to achieve its intended goal of educating radiologists on how to interpret MRI in patients with rectal cancer undergoing treatment using a TNT-type treatment paradigm and a Watch-and-Wait approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - James R Costello
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention, Motiff Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Randy D Ernst
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Abdominal Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sonia Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Ekta Maheshwari
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Ashish P Wasnik
- Department of Radiology, University of MI-Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Miranda J, Horvat N, Assuncao AN, de M Machado FA, Chakraborty J, Pandini RV, Saraiva S, Nahas CSR, Nahas SC, Nomura CH. MRI-based radiomic score increased mrTRG accuracy in predicting rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1911-1920. [PMID: 37004557 PMCID: PMC10942660 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03898-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics score, i.e., "rad-score," and to investigate the performance of rad-score alone and combined with mrTRG in predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. METHODS This retrospective study included consecutive patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery from between July 2011 to November 2015. Volumes of interest of the entire tumor on baseline rectal MRI and of the tumor bed on restaging rectal MRI were manually segmented on T2-weighted images. The radiologist also provided the ymrTRG score on the restaging MRI. Radiomic score (rad-score) was calculated and optimal cut-off points for both mrTRG and rad-score to predict pCR were selected using Youden's J statistic. RESULTS Of 180 patients (mean age = 63 years; 60% men), 33/180 (18%) achieved pCR. High rad-score (> - 1.49) yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.758, comparable to ymrTRG 1-2 which yielded an AUC of 0.759. The combination of high rad-score and ymrTRG 1-2 yielded a significantly higher AUC of 0.836 compared with ymrTRG 1-2 and high rad-score alone (p < 0.001). A logistic regression model incorporating both high rad-score and mrTRG 1-2 was built to calculate adjusted odds ratios for pCR, which was 4.85 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that a rectal restaging MRI-based rad-score had comparable diagnostic performance to ymrTRG. Moreover, the combined rad-score and ymrTRG model yielded a significant better diagnostic performance for predicting pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Antonildes N Assuncao
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Research and Education Institute, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Jayasree Chakraborty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Samya Saraiva
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - Cesar Higa Nomura
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spaander MCW, Zauber AG, Syngal S, Blaser MJ, Sung JJ, You YN, Kuipers EJ. Young-onset colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2023; 9:21. [PMID: 37105987 PMCID: PMC10589420 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-023-00432-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
In the past decades the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in people under the age of 50 years has increased, which is referred to as early-onset CRC or young-onset CRC (YO-CRC). YO-CRC is expected to account for 11% of colon cancers and 23% of rectal cancers by 2030. This trend is observed in different parts of the world and in both men and women. In 20% of patients with YO-CRC, a hereditary cancer syndrome is found as the underlying cause; however, in the majority of patients no genetic predisposition is present. Beginning in the 1950s, major changes in lifestyle such as antibiotic use, low physical activity and obesity have affected the gut microbiome and may be an important factor in YO-CRC development. Owing to a lack of screening, patients with YO-CRC are often diagnosed with advanced-stage disease. Long-term treatment-related complications should be taken into account in these younger patients, making the more traditional sequential approaches of drug therapy not always the most appropriate option. To better understand the underlying mechanism and define relationships between environmental factors and YO-CRC development, long-term prospective studies are needed with lifestyle data collected from childhood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center/Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin J Blaser
- Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Joseph J Sung
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center/Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kang MK. Implications of recent neoadjuvant clinical trials on the future practice of radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:1011-1025. [PMID: 36844136 PMCID: PMC9950859 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i6.1011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last two decades, the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has been neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus total mesorectal excision followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) and immunotherapy are two major issues in the treatment of LARC. In the two latest phase III randomized controlled trials (RAPIDO and PRODIGE23), the TNT approach achieved higher rates of pathologic complete response and distant metastasis-free survival than conventional chemoradiotherapy. Phase I/II clinical trials have reported promising response rates to neoadjuvant (chemo)-radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Accordingly, the treatment paradigm for LARC is shifting toward methods that increase the oncologic outcomes and organ preservation rate. However, despite the progress of these combined modality treatment strategies for LARC, the radiotherapy details in clinical trials have not changed significantly. To guide future radiotherapy for LARC with clinical and radiobiological evidence, this study reviewed recent neoadjuvant clinical trials evaluating TNT and immunotherapy from a radiation oncologist’s perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Kyu Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41944, South Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu 40414, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Horvat N, El Homsi M, Miranda J, Mazaheri Y, Gollub MJ, Paroder V. Rectal MRI Interpretation After Neoadjuvant Therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:353-369. [PMID: 36073323 PMCID: PMC9851947 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, several key advances in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer have been made, including the implementation of total mesorectal excision as the standard surgical approach; use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in selected patients with a high risk of local recurrence, and finally, adoption of organ preservation strategies, through either local excision or nonoperative management in selected patients with clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. This review aims to shed light on the role of rectal MRI in the assessment of treatment response after neoadjuvant therapy, which is especially important given the growing feasibility of nonoperative management. First, an overview of current neoadjuvant therapies and response assessment based on digital rectal examination, endoscopy, and MRI will be provided. Second, the use of a high-quality restaging rectal MRI protocol will be presented. Third, a step-by-step approach to assessing treatment response on restaging rectal MRI following neoadjuvant treatment will be outlined, acknowledging challenges faced by radiologists during MRI interpretation. Finally, research related to response assessment will be discussed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria El Homsi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Yousef Mazaheri
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc J. Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grotenhuis BA, Beets GL. Watch-and-Wait is an Option in Rectal Cancer Patients: From Controversy to Common Clinical Practice. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:124-129. [PMID: 36481218 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Overview of the introduction of organ preservation in rectal cancer patients and future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B A Grotenhuis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G L Beets
- GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|