1
|
Balzekas I, Sladky V, Nejedly P, Brinkmann BH, Crepeau D, Mivalt F, Gregg NM, Pal Attia T, Marks VS, Wheeler L, Riccelli TE, Staab JP, Lundstrom BN, Miller KJ, Van Gompel J, Kremen V, Croarkin PE, Worrell GA. Invasive Electrophysiology for Circuit Discovery and Study of Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders in Patients With Epilepsy: Challenges, Opportunities, and Novel Technologies. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:702605. [PMID: 34381344 PMCID: PMC8349989 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.702605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Intracranial electroencephalographic (iEEG) recordings from patients with epilepsy provide distinct opportunities and novel data for the study of co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Comorbid psychiatric disorders are very common in drug-resistant epilepsy and their added complexity warrants careful consideration. In this review, we first discuss psychiatric comorbidities and symptoms in patients with epilepsy. We describe how epilepsy can potentially impact patient presentation and how these factors can be addressed in the experimental designs of studies focused on the electrophysiologic correlates of mood. Second, we review emerging technologies to integrate long-term iEEG recording with dense behavioral tracking in naturalistic environments. Third, we explore questions on how best to address the intersection between epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidities. Advances in ambulatory iEEG and long-term behavioral monitoring technologies will be instrumental in studying the intersection of seizures, epilepsy, psychiatric comorbidities, and their underlying circuitry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irena Balzekas
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Biomedical Engineering and Physiology Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, United States
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States
- Mayo Clinic Medical Scientist Training Program, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Vladimir Sladky
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czechia
| | - Petr Nejedly
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- The Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Brno, Czechia
| | - Benjamin H. Brinkmann
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Daniel Crepeau
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Filip Mivalt
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czechia
| | - Nicholas M. Gregg
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Tal Pal Attia
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Victoria S. Marks
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Biomedical Engineering and Physiology Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Lydia Wheeler
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Biomedical Engineering and Physiology Graduate Program, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester, MN, United States
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Tori E. Riccelli
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jeffrey P. Staab
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Brian Nils Lundstrom
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Kai J. Miller
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jamie Van Gompel
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Vaclav Kremen
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
| | - Paul E. Croarkin
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Gregory A. Worrell
- Bioelectronics, Neurophysiology, and Engineering Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
This article reviews the epilepsy cycle, distinguishing the interictal, preictal, ictal, and postictal phases. Evidence suggesting that the preictal phase can sometimes be identified based on neurophysiologic signals, premonitory features, the presence of trigger factors, or self-report is also reviewed. Diary studies have shown that seizures are not randomly distributed in time and that a subgroup of persons with epilepsy can predict an impending seizure. Paper diary data and preliminary analysis of electronic diary data suggest that seizure prediction is feasible. Whereas all of this evidence sets the stage for seizure prediction and preemptive therapy, several questions remain unanswered. First, what proportion of persons with epilepsy can predict their seizures? Second, within and among individuals, how accurate is prediction? Third, can prediction be improved through education about group level or individual predictors? And finally, in a group that can make robust predictions what are the most effective interventions for reducing seizure probability at times of high risk? The answers to these questions could reduce the burden of epilepsy by making seizures predictable and setting the stage for preemptive therapy. This work could improve the understanding of epilepsy by providing a context for studying the transitions from the interictal to preictal and ictal states. More prospective studies are needed; challenges certainly exist, but as the studies discussed here demonstrate, the field is rich with promise for improving the lives of patients with epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheryl R Haut
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, New York, NY 10467, USA.
| | - Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, New York, NY 10467, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY 10461, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Scaramelli A, Braga P, Avellanal A, Bogacz A, Camejo C, Rega I, Messano T, Arciere B. Prodromal symptoms in epileptic patients: clinical characterization of the pre-ictal phase. Seizure 2008; 18:246-50. [PMID: 19042142 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2008.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2008] [Revised: 10/17/2008] [Accepted: 10/23/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Although recent advances in seizure anticipation have been achieved with the development of several biomathematical electroencephalographic (EEG) methods, pre-ictal clinical phenomena have not been extensively investigated. The aim of the study was to thoroughly analyze premonitory or prodromal symptoms (PS) in a randomly selected sample of 100 adult epileptic patients. A semi-structured protocol was used for in-person interviews to both patients and observers. PS were found in 39% of patients, the most frequent ones being behavioral, cognitive and mood changes. Both patients with focal and generalized epilepsies reported prodromes, although they were more frequently found in the former group. PS were mostly perceived preceding complex partial and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Prodromal symptoms were reported to have an insidious onset and their duration ranged from 30min to several hours. The potential value of prodromes in seizure anticipation would allow the use of preventive and therapeutic measures, including drugs, neurostimulation procedures and behavioral intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Scaramelli
- Instituto de Neurología, Hospital de Clínicas, Av. Italia S/N, Montevideo 11600, Uruguay.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|