Chromosomal alterations in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma as detected by comparative genomic hybridization

Uterine sarcomas: clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, by Spanish group for research on sarcomas (GEIS)

Uterine sarcomas are very infrequent and heterogeneous entities. Due to its rarity, pathological diagnosis, surgical management, and systemic treatment are challenging. Treatment decision process in these tumors should be taken in a multidisciplinary tumor board. Available evidence is low and, in many cases, based on case series or clinical trials in which these tumors have been included with other soft tissue sarcoma. In these guidelines, we have tried to summarize the most relevant evidence in the diagnosis, staging, pathological disparities, surgical management, systemic treatment, and follow-up of uterine sarcomas.

[Endometrial and other rare uterine sarcomas : Diagnostic aspects in the context of the 2020 WHO classification]

Uterine sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies. Mostly (40-50%), they are leiomyosarcomas, followed by endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS), low-grade (LG) and high-grade (HG), as well as undifferentiated sarcoma of the uterus (UUS) and adenosarcomas (AS). Other, non-organ-specific tumours such as NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasia, perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) are extremely difficult to differentiate.In the most recent WHO classification, endometrial stromal tumours are subdivided as follows: benign, expansively growing endometrial stromal nodule (ESN) with sharp demarcation, the histologically similar-looking LG-ESS with infiltrative growth, the highly malignant HG-ESS and, as a diagnosis of exclusion, the highly aggressive UUS lacking specific lines of differentiation. LG-ESS can be differentiated from HG-ESS in most cases histomorphologically and immunohistochemically, but molecular investigations are necessary in individual cases. HG-ESS can be divided into 4 subtypes (YWHAE/NUTM2 fusion low-grade component, YWHAE/NUTM2 fusion high-grade component, ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion or BCOR-ITD) on the basis of molecular findings. Prognostically unfavourable factors in AS are severe sarcomatous overgrowth, deep myometrial invasion, high-grade histology and lymphatic vessel invasion. Tumours with NTRK fusion are immunohistochemically positive for S100 and TRK. PEComas express cathepsin K and HMB45, as well as TFE3 when translocation is present. Almost every IMT shows an alteration in the ALK gene In the case of overlapping morphology and simultaneous therapeutic and prognostic relevance, it is becoming increasingly important to verify or confirm the suspected histomorphological diagnosis by immunohistochemical and possibly molecular investigations.

Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma With Sex Cord-like Differentiation and PHF1-JAZF1 Fusion With Deletions: A Diagnostic Pitfall of JAZF1 FISH

The molecular knowledge on endometrial stromal neoplasms has been rapidly increasing and is considered complementary to morphologic and immunohistochemical findings for better categorization of these tumors. The most common molecular alteration observed in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas is the JAZF1-SUZ12 fusion, whereas, low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with sex cord-like differentiation have been shown more commonly to have fusions involving PHF1. Herein, we present a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with sex cord-like differentiation with a fluorescence in situ hybridization showing the apparent loss of one copy of JAZF1 5' and 3' signals, rather than the expected "break-apart" pattern seen in the setting of a JAZF1 fusion. The case was then further evaluated by chromosome microarray and RNA fusion analysis. Overall, the molecular findings supported a PHF1-JAZF1 fusion with deletions right before and after the JAZF1 locus, impairing probe binding and resulting in the unusual "deletion" pattern observed in the JAZF1 fluorescence in situ hybridization, which would not intuitively suggest a fusion involving JAZF1. This case illustrates the importance of integration of morphological and molecular findings as well as the limitations of fluorescence in situ hybridization in detecting fusions, particularly in the setting of more complex chromosomal alterations even though the fusion partners are well-known.

[Interdisciplinary S2k guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of uterine sarcomas-recommendations for surgical pathology]

Uterine sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies, derived from the myometrium, the endometrial stroma, and very rarely from the nonspecialized uterine soft tissue. The actual incidence is about 1.5 for Caucasian and 3.0 for Afro-American women. There is no grading system for leimoysarcoma defined by the WHO classification; however, if clinicians request, the FNCLCC grading can be specified in analogy to soft tissue sarcomas. Adenosarcomas must be distinguished from adenofibromas (the existence of which is questionable)-with the vast majority of these tumors being uterine adenosarcomas. Within adenosarcomas, deep myometrial invasion (>50%), sarcomatous overgrowth, and a high-grade heterologous component are associated with a higher recurrence rate and poor survival. The immunohistochemical panel represents a very helpful tool for distinguishing low-grade from high grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) and may be supplemented by molecular analyses. Steroid hormone receptor analysis should be performed for all ESS due to the possible therapeutic relevance. Undifferentiated uterine sarcomas represent a diagnosis of exclusion and have a very poor prognosis. Carcinosarcomas represent a special subtype of endometrial carcinomas and are in fact not uterine sarcomas. Uterine sarcomas may present substantial intratumoral heterogeneity and adequate embedding is mandatory. Lesions ≤2 cm in the largest dimension should be processed completely and larger tumors should be processed with one block per centimeter for the largest tumor dimension.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma: A review of rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasm

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to analyze the pathological aspects, diagnosis and treatment of rare mesenchymal uterine tumors.

METHODS

On August 2019, a systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar search engines. The systematic review was carried out in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes statement (PRISMA). The following words and key phrases have been searched: "endometrial stromal sarcoma", "low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "uterine sarcoma", "mesenchymal uterine tumors" and "uterine stromal sarcoma". Across these platforms and research studies, five main aspects were analyzed: the biological characteristics of the neoplasms, the number of cases, the different therapeutic approaches used, the follow-up and the oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 94 studies initially identified, 55 were chosen selecting articles focusing on endometrial stromal sarcoma. Of these fifty-five studies, 46 were retrospective in design, 7 were reviews and 2 randomized phases III trials.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasms and surgery represents the standard treatment. For uterus-limited disease, the remove en bloc with an intact resection of the tumor (without the use of morcellation) is strongly recommended. For advanced-stage disease, the standard surgical treatment is adequate cytoreduction with metastatectomy. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended in patients with Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS), while is not clear whether cytoreduction of advanced tumors improves patient survival in High-grade ESS. Administration of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy is not routinely used and its role is still debated.

Endometrial stromal sarcomas with BCOR-rearrangement harbor MDM2 amplifications

Recently a novel subtype of endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) defined by recurrent genomic alterations involving BCOR has been described (HGESS‐BCOR). We identified a case of HGESS‐BCOR with a ZC3H7B‐BCOR gene fusion, which harbored an amplification of the MDM2 locus. This index case prompted us to investigate MDM2 amplification in four additional cases of HGESS‐BCOR. Tumors were analyzed for MDM2 amplification by array‐based profiling of copy number alterations (CNAs) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as well as for MDM2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Additionally, a cohort of other mesenchymal uterine neoplasms, including 17 low‐grade ESS, 6 classical high‐grade ESS with YWHAE‐rearrangement, 16 uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors, 7 uterine leiomyomas and 8 uterine leiomyosarcomas, was analyzed for CNAs in MDM2. Copy number profiling identified amplification of the 12q15 region involving the MDM2 locus in all five HGESS‐BCOR. Subsequent validation analyses of three tumors confirmed MDM2 amplification using MDM2 FISH. Accordingly, IHC showed MDM2 overexpression in all analyzed cases. None of the other uterine neoplasms in our series, including tumors that are in the histopathological differential diagnoses of HGESS‐BCOR, showed copy number gains of MDM2. Together, our results indicate that HGESS‐BCOR carries MDM2 amplifications, which has diagnostic implications and could potentially be used for targeted therapies in these clinically aggressive tumors.

Genomic Landscape of Uterine Sarcomas Defined Through Prospective Clinical Sequencing

PURPOSE

We examined whether prospective molecular characterization of advanced metastatic disease can reveal grade and/or histology-specific differences to inform diagnosis and facilitate enrollment onto clinical trials.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with uterine sarcoma consented to a prospective study of next-generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical annotations were extracted from their medical record. Tumor and matched normal DNA were subjected to NGS, and the genomic landscape was explored for survival correlations and therapeutic targetability.

RESULTS

Tumors from 107 women were sequenced and included leiomyosarcoma (n = 80), high-grade non-leiomyosarcoma (n = 22), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS, n = 4), and smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP, n = 2). Genomic profiling influenced histologic diagnosis in three cases. Common uterine leiomyosarcoma alterations were loss-of-function mutations in TP53 (56%), RB1 (51%), and ATRX (31%). Homozygous deletions of BRCA2 were present in 5% of these patients. PTEN alteration frequency was higher in the metastases samples as compared with the primary samples. Genomes of low-grade tumors were largely silent, while 50.5% of high-grade tumors had whole-genome duplication. Two metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma cases were hypermutated. Both had prolonged disease-free survival. Potentially actionable mutations were identified in 48 patients (45%), 8 (17%) of whom received matched therapy with 2 achieving clinical responses. Among patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma with somatic BRCA2 alterations, sustained partial responses were observed with PARP inhibitor-containing therapy.

DISCUSSION

Prospective genomic profiling can contribute to diagnostic precision and inform treatment selection in patients with uterine sarcomas. There was evidence of clinical benefit in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma with somatic BRCA2 alterations treated with PARP inhibitors.

Undifferentiated Uterine Sarcomas Represent Under-Recognized High-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcomas

Undifferentiated uterine sarcoma is a diagnosis of exclusion with limited molecular genetic data available. Recent recognition of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas with diverse genotypes suggests that some tumors classified as undifferentiated uterine sarcomas may represent misdiagnosed high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. Archival material from 10 tumors diagnosed as undifferentiated uterine sarcomas in 2009 to 2017 were collected. BCOR immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using break-apart probes flanking BCOR, ZC3H7B, CCNB3, YWHAE, NUTM2, JAZF1, and BCORL1 were performed. Tumors lacking or harboring gene rearrangement with no known fusion partner by FISH were subjected to targeted RNA sequencing. Morphology was correlated with FISH and sequencing results. BCOR expression was moderate to strong in ≥50% of cells in 8 tumors, while weak in <5% cells and negative in 2. FISH detected mutually exclusive ZC3H7B-BCOR and YWHAE-NUTM2 fusions in 3 uniform undifferentiated uterine sarcomas; 2 pleomorphic tumors harbored YWHAE rearrangement with no known partner. Targeted RNA sequencing of 5 FISH-negative uniform undifferentiated uterine sarcomas detected BRD8-PHF1 and YWHAE-NUTM2B fusions and BCOR internal tandem duplication in 4 of them. Tumors with YWHAE-NUTM2 fusions and BCOR genetic abnormalities showed morphology characteristic of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. No fusions were detected by sequencing in the tumor with YWHAE rearrangement only by FISH. Most tumors classified as undifferentiated uterine sarcomas represent misdiagnosed high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas. BCOR expression in ≥50% of cells may help triage tumors for molecular confirmation of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma-related genetic abnormalities. Novel YWHAE rearrangements may define a subset of true undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas.

Uterine Mesenchymal Tumors: Update on Classification, Staging, and Molecular Features

The spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasia in the uterus has expanded in recent years. First, the identification of prevalent, recurrent molecular alterations has led to a more biologically and clinically congruent classification of endometrial stromal tumors. Likewise, the diagnostic criteria of several rare and miscellaneous tumor types have been refined in recent case series (Perivascular Epithelioid Cell tumor, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor). Pure mesenchymal tumors are still broadly classified based on morphology according to the tumor cell phenotype. Smooth muscle tumors predominate in frequency, followed by tumors of endometrial stromal derivation; the latter are covered in depth in this article with an emphasis on defining molecular alterations and their morphologic and clinical correlates. The remaining entities comprise a miscellaneous group in which cell derivation does not have a normal counterpart in the uterus (eg, rhabdomyosarcoma) or is obscure (eg, undifferentiated uterine sarcoma). This article discusses their clinical relevance, recent insights into their molecular biology, and the most important differential diagnoses. Regarding the latter, immunohistochemistry and (increasingly) molecular diagnostics play a role in the diagnostic workup. We conclude with a few considerations on intraoperative consultation and macroscopic examination, as well as pathologic staging and grading of uterine sarcomas as per the most recent American Joint Cancer Commission and the Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique staging systems.

NTRK Fusions Define a Novel Uterine Sarcoma Subtype With Features of Fibrosarcoma

Tropomyosin receptor kinase (Trk) inhibitors have shown high response rates in patients with tumors harboring NTRK fusions. We identified 4 NTRK fusion-positive uterine sarcomas that should be distinguished from leiomyosarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. NTRK rearrangements were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or targeted RNA or DNA sequencing in 4 undifferentiated uterine sarcomas with spindle cell morphology. Because of histologic overlap with leiomyosarcoma, TrkA and pan-Trk immunohistochemistry was performed in 97 uterine leiomyosarcomas. NTRK1 and NTRK3 FISH was performed on tumors with TrkA or pan-Trk staining. We also performed whole transcriptome RNA sequencing of a leiomyosarcoma with TrkA expression and targeted RNA sequencing of 2 additional undifferentiated uterine sarcomas. FISH and/or targeted RNA or DNA sequencing in the study group showed TPM3-NTRK1, LMNA-NTRK1, RBPMS-NTRK3, and TPR-NTRK1 fusions. All tumors were composed of fascicles of spindle cells. Mitotic index was 7 to 30 mitotic figures per 10 high power fields; tumor necrosis was seen in 2 tumors. Desmin, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor were negative in all tumors, while pan-Trk was expressed in all tumors with concurrent TrkA staining in 3 of them. TrkA and/or pan-Trk staining was also seen in 6 leiomyosarcomas, but these tumors lacked NTRK fusions or alternative isoforms by FISH or whole transcriptome sequencing. No fusions were detected in 2 undifferentiated uterine sarcomas. NTRK fusion-positive uterine spindle cell sarcomas constitute a novel tumor type with features of fibrosarcoma; patients with these tumors may benefit from Trk inhibition. TrkA and pan-Trk expression in leiomyosarcomas is rare and does not correlate with NTRK rearrangement.

Diagnostic immunohistochemistry in gynaecological neoplasia: a brief survey of the most common scenarios

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable adjunct in routine gynaecological pathology. The molecular revolution has redesigned knowledge of gynaecological cancers and refined histological classification. The direct consequence has been the progressive introduction of new immunostainings for diagnostic and classification purposes. Hence, we review the routine diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry in the field of gynaecological neoplasia. We reviewed the immunomarkers useful in gynaecological pathology according to literature revision, our personal experience and research findings. We discuss the application of immunohistochemistry to reach the most accurate diagnosis in morphologically equivocal cases of gynaecological pathology and present the appropriate panel of immunomarkers in the most common scenarios of gynaecological pathology. This short review provides an updated overview of the essential immunohistochemical markers currently used in the diagnostics of gynaecological malignancies along with their molecular rationale.

BCOR is a robust diagnostic immunohistochemical marker of genetically diverse high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, including tumors exhibiting variant morphology

Recognition of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma is important because of its aggressive clinical behavior. Morphologic features of YWHAE-NUTM2 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma may overlap with other uterine sarcoma types. BCOR immunoexpression was studied in these tumors and their morphologic mimics to assess its diagnostic utility. BCOR immunohistochemical staining was performed on archival tissue from 28 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas with classic morphology (20 YWHAE-NUTM2, 5 ZC3H7B-BCOR, 3 BCOR-ZC3H7B), 3 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas with unusual morphology and unknown gene rearrangement status, 66 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, 21 endometrial stromal nodules, 38 uterine leiomyosarcomas, and 19 uterine leiomyomas. Intensity of nuclear staining and percentage of positive tumor cells were recorded. Strong diffuse nuclear BCOR staining (defined as >95% of tumor cells) was seen in the round cell component of all 20 (100%) classic YWHAE-NUTM2 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and the 3 unusual high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas which prompted FISH studies confirming YWHAE rearrangement in 2 tumors. Genomic PCR confirmed the presence of BCOR exon 16 internal tandem duplication in the third case. Diffuse BCOR staining was strong in three and weak in one BCOR-rearranged high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma while absent in the remaining four BCOR-rearranged tumors. BCOR staining was weakly positive in <5% of tumor cells in 4 of 66 (6%) low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas and 1 of 18 (6%) endometrial stromal nodules and weakly to moderately positive in <5-40% of tumor cells in 6 of 31 (19%) leiomyosarcomas. No BCOR staining was seen in the remaining low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, endometrial stromal nodules, leiomyosarcomas, or any of the leiomyomas. BCOR immunohistochemical staining is a highly sensitive marker for YWHAE-NUTM2 high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with both classic and unusual morphology and identifies a subset of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with BCOR alterations, including BCOR rearrangement and internal tandem duplication.

Novel High-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: A Morphologic Mimicker of Myxoid Leiomyosarcoma

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are often underpinned by recurrent chromosomal translocations resulting in the fusion of genes involved in epigenetic regulation. To date, only YWHAE-NUTM2 rearrangements are associated with distinctive high-grade morphology and aggressive clinical behavior. We identified 3 ESS morphologically mimicking myxoid leiomyosarcoma of the uterus and sought to describe their unique histopathologic features and identify genetic alterations using next-generation sequencing. All cases displayed predominantly spindled cells associated with abundant myxoid stroma and brisk mitotic activity. Tumors involved the endometrium and demonstrated tongue-like myometrial infiltration. All 3 were associated with an aggressive clinical course, including multisite bony metastases in 1 patient, progressive peritoneal disease after chemotherapy in another, and metastases to the lung and skin in the last patient. All 3 ESS were found to harbor ZC3H7B-BCOR gene fusions by targeted sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. On the basis of the review of these cases, we find that ESS with ZC3H7B-BCOR fusion constitutes a novel type of high-grade ESS and shares significant morphologic overlap with myxoid leiomyosarcoma.

Macrophage infiltration and genetic landscape of undifferentiated uterine sarcomas

Endometrial stromal tumors include translocation-associated low- and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) and highly malignant undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUS). UUS is considered a poorly defined group of aggressive tumors and is often seen as a diagnosis of exclusion after ESS and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) have been ruled out. We performed a comprehensive analysis of gene expression, copy number variation, point mutations, and immune cell infiltrates in the largest series to date of all major types of uterine sarcomas to shed light on the biology of UUS and to identify potential novel therapeutic targets. We show that UUS tumors have a distinct molecular profile from LMS and ESS. Gene expression and immunohistochemical analyses revealed the presence of high numbers of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in UUS, which makes UUS patients suitable candidates for therapies targeting TAMs. Our results show a high genomic instability of UUS and downregulation of several TP53-mediated tumor suppressor genes, such as NDN, CDH11, and NDRG4. Moreover, we demonstrate that UUS carry somatic mutations in several oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes implicated in RAS/PI3K/AKT/mTOR, ERBB3, and Hedgehog signaling.

Molecular characteristics of uterine sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

Uterine sarcomas are rare cancers, of which the most common entities are leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma. These two tumors may have overlapping clinical presentation, morphology and immunohistochemical profile, but are increasingly recognized to be two molecularly distinct entities. Endometrial stromal sarcomas are further currently divided into a low-grade and high-grade group based on molecular characteristics. Area covered: This review discusses recent data which shed light on the molecular profile of these two cancers and may aid in understanding their evolution and progression, in the aim of improving their diagnosis and management. Search was through PubMed, with focus on studies published in the last 5 years. Expert commentary: The literature presented and discussed documents rapidly expanding knowledge of the genetic characteristics of leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma, with an array of molecules and pathways implicated in the biology of these cancers. Several of these molecules are potential therapeutic targets. Assessment of their predictive and prognostic role awaits larger studies.

Genomic landscape of endometrial stromal sarcoma of uterus

Although recurrent gene fusions such as JAZF1-JJAZ1 are considered driver events for endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) development, other genomic alterations remain largely unknown. In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing and copy number profiling for five ESSs (three low-grade ESS (LG-ESS) and two undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUSs)). All three LG-ESSs exhibited either one of JAZF1-SUZ12, JAZF1-PHF1 and MEAF6-PHF1 fusions, whereas the two UUSs did not. All ESSs except one LG-ESS exhibited copy number alterations (CNAs), many of which encompassed cancer-related genes. In UUSs, five CNAs encompassing cancer-related genes (EZR, CDH1, RB1, TP53 and PRKAR1A) accompanied their expressional changes, suggesting that they might stimulate UUS development. We found 81 non-silent mutations (35 from LG-ESSs and 46 from UUSs) that included 15 putative cancer genes catalogued in cancer-related databases, including PPARG and IRF4 mutations. However, they were non-recurrent and did not include any well-known mutations, indicating that point mutations may not be a major driver for ESS development. Our data show that gene fusions and CNAs are the principal drivers for LG-ESS and USS, respectively, but both may require additional genomic alterations including point mutations. These differences may explain the different biologic behaviors between LG-ESS and UUS. Our findings suggest that ESS development requires point mutations and CNAs as well as the gene fusions.

JAZF1/SUZ12 gene fusion in endometrial stromal sarcomas

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESSs) belong to the rarest uterine malignancies (prevalence category <1-9/1,000,000). According to the new 2014 World Health Organisation (WHO) classification, they are separated into four categories; benign endometrial stromal nodules (ESNs), low grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LG-ESSs), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (HG-ESSs) and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUSs). Due to heterogeneous histopathologic appearance these tumors still represent diagnostic challenge, even for experienced pathologists. ESSs are genetically very heterogeneous and several chromosomal translocations and gene fusions have so far been identified in these malignancies. To date the JAZF1/SUZ12 gene fusion is by far the most frequent and seems to be the cytogenetic hallmark of ESN and LG-ESS. Based on present literature data this gene fusion is present in approximately 75 % of ESN, 50 % of LG-ESS and 15 % of HG-ESS cases. The frequency of JAZF1/SUZ12 appearance varies between classic ESS and different morphologic variants. This gene fusion is suggested to become a specific diagnostic tool, especially in difficult borderline cases. In combination with the recently described YWHAE/FAM22 gene fusion the JAZF1/SUZ12 fusion could be used to differentiate between LG-ESS and HG-ESS. The purpose of this review is to summarize literature data published in last two and a half decades about this gene fusion, as a contribution to our understanding of ESS genetics and pathogenesis.

Genomic characterization of endometrial stromal sarcomas with array comparative genomic hybridization

INTRODUCTION

The endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a very rare uterine sarcoma, counting for 1-3% of all gynecologic malignancies. ESS represents 0.2-8% of all uterine malignant tumors and accounts for about 10% of all uterine sarcomas. With regard to chromosomal aberrations, very little is known about benign and malignant endometrial stromal tumors.

METHODS

30 tumors, consisting of 4 cases of benign endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), 22 cases of low-grade ESS and 4 cases of undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (UES), were analyzed by array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).

RESULTS

ESN did not show many copy number changes (CNCs) by aCGH. Frequent losses could be identified on chromosomes 7p and 19, and gains on chromosomes 1q, 6p and 8q. Low-grade ESS presented as a very heterogeneous group. 90% (20/22) of cases displayed aberrations. Most frequent changes were losses on chromosomes 7 and 22, and gains on chromosome 1q or 11. UES showed a high number of chromosomal aberrations and on every chromosome CNCs were detected. Most frequent changes were losses on chromosomes 1q, 2q (3/4, 75%) and 13, and gains on chromosomes 1q and 17p.

CONCLUSION

Our data shows an increasing number of CNCs from ESN to low-grade ESS and to UES. However, the chromosomal aberrations differ considerably between the investigated ESN-, low-grade ESS- and UES cases and thus, a linear tumor progression seems to be unlikely.

Endometrial stromal tumours revisited: an update based on the 2014 WHO classification

Endometrial stromal tumours (EST) are rare tumours of endometrial stromal origin that account for less than 2% of all uterine tumours. Recent cytogenetic and molecular advances in this area have improved our understanding of ESTs and helped refine their classification into more meaningful categories. Accordingly, the newly released 2014 WHO classification system recognises four categories: endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HGESS) and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). At the molecular level, these tumours may demonstrate a relatively simple karyotype with a defining chromosomal rearrangement (as in the majority of ESNs, LGESSs and YWHAE-rearranged HGESS) or demonstrate complex cytogenetic aberrations lacking specific rearrangements (as in UUSs). Herein we provide an update on this topic aimed at the practicing pathologist.

A prognosis based classification of undifferentiated uterine sarcomas: identification of mitotic index, hormone receptors and YWHAE-FAM22 translocation status as predictors of survival

Undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUS) are rare tumors with a heterologous biology and a poor prognosis. The goal of this study was to examine clinicopathology, biomarkers and YWHAE-FAM22 translocation status, in the prognosis of these tumors. Twenty-six cases of UUS were included. All original slides were rereviewed and age at diagnosis, tumor stage, "Kurihara" diagnosis, mitotic index, presence of necrosis and grade of nuclear atypia were recorded. Additionally, a tissue microarray was constructed from 22 of the cases, and the protein biomarkers P53, P16, Ki-67, Cyclin-D1, ER, PR and ANLN were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. All tumors were evaluated for the presence of a YWHAE-FAM translocation; the translocation was demonstrated in the three Cyclin-D1 positive tumors. Follow-up data in the form of overall survival were available on all patients. These tumors could be divided into two prognostic groups, a high mitotic index group (10 cases, M = 36.8, SD = 5.4) and a low mitotic index group (16 cases, M = 8.7, SD = 5.8). These two groups showed a statistically significant difference in prognosis. The expression of ER, PR or presence of the YWHAE-FAM22 translocation correlated with low mitotic index and an additionally improved prognosis, although the number of cases was small. These results indicate that UUS can be divided into two prognostic groups using mitotic index as a primary criteria, followed by expression of either ER, PR or the presence of a YWHAE-FAM22 translocation as a secondary criteria. This study demonstrates the presence of statistically significant prognostic subgroups within UUS, and provides treatment insights.

Endometrial stromal tumors: immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of potential targets of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The systemic treatment of malignant endometrial stromal tumors (EST) is not well established. A few reports describe objective responses to imatinib, which suggest a novel therapeutic strategy for these tumors. Due to these facts, we aimed to perform a retrospective analysis of possible molecular targets of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in EST: KIT, PDGFRA and EGFR.

METHODS

52 endometrial stromal sarcomas and 13 undifferentiated endometrial sarcomas were examined and reviewed. Mutational analysis were performed for exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 of the KIT gene, exons 12 and 18 of the PDGFRA gene and exons 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the EGFR gene. The incidence and distribution of the KIT, PDGFRA, and EGFR expression were examined by immunohistochemistry, and EGFR amplification was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

No mutations in KIT, PDGFRA and EGFR genes were detected. Overexpression of KIT, PDGFRA, EGFR, was detected in 2 (3%), 23 (35.4%), 7 (10.8%) cases respectively, whereas amplification of EGFR gene was not found.

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of significant expression, amplification and activating mutations on these tyrosine kinase receptors suggest that it is unlikely that EST can benefit from therapies such as TKI on the systemic setting.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma: A review of the literature

Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare malignant tumors of the uterus, and most of the information available in literature is based on small series or case reports. A proper preoperative diagnosis is difficult and in most cases the diagnosis is confirmed after hysterectomy for a presumed benign disease. Endometrial sampling, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging can provide diagnostic clues. Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy is the main line of management and for early disease complete cure is a reality. Ovarian conservation may be possible in young women with early stage disease and the role of lymphadenectomy is controversial. Adjuvant hormone therapy in the form of progesterone, gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues, and aromatase inhibitors are found to be effective in preventing recurrences. Hormone therapy, radiotherapy and surgical excision of the metastasis are recommended for recurrences.

Reduced Expression of RNA Binding Protein CELF2, a Putative Tumor Suppressor Gene in Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Colon cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in both men and women in the United States. Every year, 160000 cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed, and 57000 patients die. CUGBP, Elav-like family member 2 (CELF2) is an RNA binding protein that modulates various posttranscriptional events including RNA splicing, shuttling, editing, stability and translation. Previous studies have demonstrated that CELF2 expression is low in colon cancer cells. Furthermore, ectopic overexpression of CELF2 induces cells to undergo death by mitotic catastrophe. Based on the above observations, we hypothesized that CELF2 expression might be reduced during neoplastic transformation of colon cells.

METHODS

Forty human colon cancer tissues along with 10 uninvolved normal colon tissues from cancer patients were utilized for immunohistochemical analysis of CELF2 expression.

RESULTS

We have observed that CELF2 levels are reduced in colon tumor tissues when compared to the normal intestinal tissues. The data set suggests that RNA binding protein CELF2 could be a potential tumor suppressor protein. CELF2 was predominantly nuclear in normal cells, while the cancer tissues had diffused cytoplasmic staining.

CONCLUSION

CELF2 expression is consistently reduced during neoplastic transformation suggesting that it might play a crucial role in tumor initiation and progression.

Molecular profiling of endometrial malignancies

Molecular profiling of endometrial neoplasms reveals genetic changes in endometrial carcinomas that support the dualistic model, in which type I carcinomas are estrogen-dependent, low grade lesions and type II carcinomas are nonestrogen dependent and high grade. The molecular changes in type I endometrial carcinomas include mutations in PTEN, PIK3CA, KRAS, and β-catenin, along with microsatellite instability, whereas type II endometrial carcinomas are characterized by genetic alterations in p53, HER2/neu, p16, and E-cadherin. For endometrial neoplasms with a malignant mesenchymal component, C-MYC mutations and loss of heterozygosity are frequently seen in carcinosarcomas, and a fusion gene, JAZF1/JJAZ1, is distinctive for endometrial stromal sarcoma. In addition, p53 mutations may play an important role in tumorigenesis of undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma. These molecular changes can help in the diagnosis of endometrial neoplasms, as well as form the basis of molecular targeted therapy.

Molecular Genetics of Mesenchymal Tumors of the Female Genital Tract

Mesenchymal tumors of the female genital tract are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that can be classified based on cellular differentiation into 3 main groups: smooth muscle tumors, endometrial stromal tumors, and other differentiated and undifferentiated tumors. Genomic analysis techniques have revealed important genetic aberrations such as the t(7;17) translocation, resulting in JAZF1-JJAZ1 gene fusion, characteristic of endometrial stromal tumors. These analyses have demonstrated genetic complexity and heterogeneity in many mesenchymal tumor types. This article focuses on current understanding of the molecular genetics of mesenchymal tumors of the female genital tract, with emphasis on diagnostic and prognostic molecular features.

Pathology of uterine malignancies

This overview covers epithelial, stromal and mesenchymal malignancies of the body of the uterus, excluding the cervix. The distinction of type I and type II endometrial adenocarcinoma with the morphological variants of this tumour is discussed and some molecular aspects are explored. The concept of carcinosarcoma representing a metaplastic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium that behaves more like a carcinoma than a sarcoma is explained. Some types of mixed epithelial and stromal neoplasm are described and contrasted with carcinosarcoma. The concept of stromal sarcoma and high-grade uterine sarcoma is described and an outline of malignant smooth muscle tumours of the uterus includes a description of smooth muscle tumours of uncertain malignant potential and worrying benign smooth muscle lesions.

High Frequency of JAZF1-JJAZ1 Gene Fusion in Endometrial Stromal Tumors With Smooth Muscle Differentiation by Interphase FISH Detection

The most common cytogenetic alteration observed in low-grade endometrial stromal tumors (EST) is the t(7;17)(p15;q21) translocation, resulting in the fusion of the JAZF1 and JJAZ1 genes. By reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, the translocation has been detected overall in one-third of ESTs, but only rarely in its variants. The purpose of this study was to develop a fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for detection of this translocation using archival paraffin-embedded samples of ESTs with smooth muscle differentiation and to assess the nature of the smooth muscle component of these tumors. Representative paraffin blocks of 9 endometrial stromal nodules and 1 low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma were collected for the study. In 1 case, the block selected also contained areas of sex cordlike differentiation. A fluorescence in situ hybridization probe set was designed to detect the t(7;17)(p15;q12) on tissue sections. Six out of 10 collected ESTs were assessable. Fusion signals were detected in 3 out of 6 cases (50%) in both the conventional endometrial stromal and the smooth muscle components of the tumors. The tumor sample with sex cordlike differentiation harbored the fusion signal in all the 3 components. Our results support the contention that the endometrial stromal and smooth muscle components of these tumors have the same origin, either from a common precursor cell with pluripotential differentiation or from endometrial stromal cells that have undergone smooth muscle metaplasia. Our results indicate that the detection of this chromosomal abnormality can be used to diagnose ESTs with smooth muscle differentiation when the smooth muscle component is predominant.

Uterine sarcomas

A wide variety of sarcomas occur in the uterus but two subtypes - leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma - account for a majority of those more routinely encountered. Using the 2003 World Health Organization classification, this review focuses on six uterine sarcomas: endometrial stromal sarcoma, undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, rhabomyosarcoma, angiosarcoma and liposarcoma. The epidemiological, clinical, pathological and molecular features are presented along with therapeutic approaches. Familiarity with molecular aspects of these tumors and application of novel technologies in their assessment should be encouraged as they may provide alternate therapies resulting in improved survival for the patient. Clinical information necessary for accurate diagnosis of these lesions is emphasised. A multidisciplinary approach to management of patients with uterine sarcomas is essential for optimal management.

Molecular genetic changes in epithelial, stromal and mixed neoplasms of the endometrium

Endometrial carcinoma, endometrial stromal tumours and mixed malignant mesodermal tumours (MMMT) develop along distinctive molecular genetic pathways. Two distinctive types of endometrial carcinoma are distinguished, type I and type II, which develop along distinctive pathways and show different clinical behaviour and histological features. Type I carcinomas show endometrioid histology, are oestrogen-related and develop from atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The molecular tumorigenesis is comparable to colorectal carcinoma with a step-like progression and an accumulation of genetic alterations. Alterations of PTEN, K-Ras mutations and microsatellite instability are frequent and early events in type I carcinoma, whereas p53 mutations occur during progression to grade 3 carcinoma. Serous and clear cell carcinomas are considered type II carcinomas which are mostly unrelated to oestrogen. p53 mutations occur in almost all serous carcinomas and seem to occur early, leading to massive chromosomal instability and rapid tumour progression. Gene expression profiling has supported this dualistic model of endometrial carcinoma. There is evidence of molecular differences between serous and clear cell carcinomas as well as between endometrioid carcinomas with and without microsatellite instability. A dualistic model of tumorigenesis may be also suggested for endometrial stromal tumours. Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS; type I endometrial sarcoma) are oestrogen-related and seem to develop from endometrial stromal nodules (ESN). They are histologically and genetically distinct from undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (UES) which seem to be mostly unrelated to oestrogen (type II endometrial sarcoma). ESS and ESN share the fusion gene JAZF1/JJAZ1 caused by a t(7;17)(p15;q21) translocation, whereas UES lacks a distinctive molecular alteration so far. In MMMT, which is considered a metaplastic carcinoma, p53 alteration occurs early, before clonal expansion and acquisition of genetic diversity during progression.

Sarcomatoid carcinomas of the lung—are these histogenetically heterogeneous tumors?

Sarcomatoid carcinomas (SC) of the lung are a heterogeneous group of nonsmall cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) containing a sarcoma or sarcoma-like component. SC may represent an epithelial neoplasm undergoing divergent tissue differentiation originating from a single clone. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) best describes the origin of the spindle and giant cells. We aimed to define chromosomal aberrations within the subgroups of SC and if EMT does play a role in SC. Twenty-two SC were investigated by chromosomal comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Immunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies for E-cadherin, Vimentin, c-Fos, c-Jun, Snail, TGFbeta1, Notch1, beta-catenin, Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta (GSK3beta), and Fascin. Gains occurred more frequently than losses (70.5 vs 29.5%). The shortest regions of overlap were gains on chromosomes 8q and 7 followed by 1q, 3q, and 19, supporting the common origin of the different subtypes of SC. The immunohistochemical staining suggests that the sarcomatoid components of SC might have undergone EMT, not triggered by the signaling pathways Notch1, Snail, and TGFbeta1, but probably initiated by an upregulation of c-Jun and a consecutive overexpression of Vimentin and Fascin. The Wnt-pathway was not deregulated because combined membrane and cytoplasmic reactivity for beta-catenin and GSK3beta was observed.