Primary treatment and relative survival by stage and age in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based SweGCG study

Overall survival associated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy in metastatic vulvar cancer: A retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database

Background

Large cancer registries help analyze the prognosis of rare malignancies, such as advanced vulvar cancer. This study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) rates of patients with metastatic vulvar cancer who had undergone chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy alone and identify prognostic factors using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we used the SEER database to identify patients with metastatic vulvar cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the covariates. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models were used to analyze OS.

Results

A total of 685 patients were included and divided into chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy groups, and 400 patients were included after propensity score matching. The chemoradiotherapy group had higher OS in the matched cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7367; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5906-0.9190; P = 0.0049) than the radiotherapy group, which was similar to that in the pre-matched cohort (P < 0.0001). Patients who had undergone surgery + radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy showed higher OS rates than those who had received radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for patients aged <75 years and local tumor excision/destruction or surgical removal of the primary site was the recommended surgical choice (P < 0.05). Chemoradiotherapy is sufficient for patients ≥75 years of age.

Conclusions

Patients with metastatic vulvar cancer should undergo surgery if they can tolerate it. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be encouraged because this treatment modality was associated with higher OS than radiotherapy alone.

Surgery as primary treatment improved overall survival in vulvar squamous cancer: A single center study with 108 women

OBJECTIVE

To describe a single-center experience managing women with vulvar squamous cancer and analyze factors influencing their survival.

STUDY DESIGN

It is an observational longitudinal retrospective study that reviewed medical records of patients admitted for treatment at the University of Campinas between 2010 and 2019, followed up until June 2022. The final sample was 108 cases. The main outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Other variables were age, stage, relapse, and race. Vital status was accessed by medical records, active search, or public online register. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank Test, and Regression Cox-Model assessed risks.

RESULTS

The mean age in stages IA and IB were 65.0 years, and in stages II + III + IVA 71.1 years. Women 70 years or older were more related to diagnosis in stages II + III + IVA (p = 0.019). Progression was observed in 7 (16.7 %) patients in stage IB and 30 (65.2 %) in stage II + III + IVA. Both five-year (5y) DFS and OS were significantly different in stage IB and II + III + IVA (5y-DFS 70.5 % and 39.3 %, p = 0.024; 65.1 % and 24.3 %, p < 0.001). In stages II + III + IVA, most deaths happened before 24 months of follow-up. The primary treatment was surgery in 81.0 % of stage IB and 47.8 % of stage II + III + IVA. A higher OS was observed in patients treated primarily by surgery compared to radiotherapy in stage IB (p = 0.008), and in stages II + III + IVA (p = 0.013). Surgery followed or not by adjuvant radiotherapy was independently associated with a 60 % adjusted death protection compared to radiotherapy alone as primary treatment (0.40, 0.23;0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the patients have been diagnosed in stage I. The progression rate was high in the advanced stages of the disease. Overall survival by stage was improved when surgery was the primary treatment. Surgery was independently associated with death.

Vulvar cancer incidence and net survival in Sweden 1960 to 2019: A population-based national study

INTRODUCTION

Vulvar cancer is a rare gynecological cancer affecting mostly older women. The aim of this population-based study was to investigate the incidence and net survival of vulvar cancer in Swedish women from 1960 to 2019.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data were retrieved from the mandatory Swedish Cancer Registry consisting of all women diagnosed with vulvar cancer between 1960 and 2019. Only women with a morphologically verified diagnosis of vulvar cancer were included. The individuals were then further matched with the Swedish Death Registry up until May 31, 2020.

RESULTS

In total, 8499 women were included with the following morphologies: squamous cell carcinoma 7250 (85.8%), malignant melanoma 539 (6.4%), adenocarcinoma 401 (4.8%) and other: 259 (3.1%). More than 50% of vulvar cancer cases occurred in women aged between 65 and 84 years of age. The 5-year age-standardized net survival increased from 53.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 48.9-57.5) in 1960 to 72.1% (95% CI 68.8-75.5) in 2019. The proportion of adenocarcinoma among all cases increased from 2.0% to 8.7% between the 1960s and 2010s and an increase in age-standardized 5-year net survival was found for adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The age-standardized incidence of vulvar cancer cases in Sweden was stable between 1960 and 2019. During the study period, an increase in adenocarcinoma and a decrease in malignant melanoma cases was found. Five-year net survival increased by 20 percent units during the study period. For squamous cell carcinoma, an increased age-specific 5-year net survival was observed for all age groups, apart for women aged ≥85.

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma in women 80 years and older: Treatment, survival and impact of comorbidities

BACKGROUND

Despite being a disease of mainly older women, little is known about the clinical management of older women with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). We evaluated their daily clinical management compared with younger women, and established the prevalence of comorbidities and its impact on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

All Dutch women diagnosed with VSCC from 2015 to 2020 (n = 2249) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Women aged ≥80 years (n = 632, 28%) were defined as "older" patients, women <80 years were considered as "younger". Chi-square tests were performed to evaluate differences in treatment by age group and comorbidities. Differences in OS were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier Curves and log-rank test.

RESULTS

The vast majority of both older (91%) and younger (99%) patients with FIGO IA VSCC received surgical treatment of the vulva. Older FIGO IB-IV VSCC patients were less likely to undergo groin surgery than younger patients (50% vs. 84%, p < 0.01). Performance of surgical treatment of the vulva and groin(s) was not associated with the number of comorbidities in older patients (p = 0.67 and p = 0.69). Older patients with ≥2 comorbidities did have poorer OS compared to women with one or no comorbidities (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of older patients underwent vulvar/local surgery. Older patients less often received groin surgery compared to younger patients. The majority of older patients had at least one comorbidity, but this did not impact treatment choice. The poorer survival in older VSCC patients may therefore be due to death of competing risks instead of VSCC itself.

Frailty and treatment decisions in older patients with vulvar cancer: A single-center cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Vulvar cancer is a disease that mainly affects older women. Frailty is an important predictor of outcomes and geriatric assessment can help tailor treatment decisions and improve outcomes. This study aims to assess the prevalence of frailty in older women with vulvar cancer, and how it relates to integrated geriatric care and treatment according to the oncological guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center cohort study was performed, among patients 70 years and older, who were diagnosed with vulvar cancer at Leiden University Medical Center, between January 2012 and May 2020. Data on geriatric assessment, treatment decision-making and treatment-related outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Our study included 114 patients. Mean age was 79.7 years, and 52 patients (45.6%) were frail. Of the frail patients, 42.0% were referred to a geriatrician. In eight of these cases, the geriatrician was actively involved in weighing the benefit and harm of standard oncological treatment versus de-escalated treatment. Frailty, higher age, impairment in the somatic domain, cognitive impairment, and functional dependency were associated with referral to a geriatrician and with active involvement of a geriatrician in decision making. In 26 of frail patients (50.0%) oncological treatment was de-escalated. Frailty, higher age, impairment in the somatic domain, cognitive impairment, and functional dependency were associated with de-escalation of treatment. De-escalated treatment did not compromise survival.

DISCUSSION

Frailty is prevalent among older women with vulvar cancer and is associated with referral to a geriatrician and de-escalation of oncological treatment. While this reflects that it is deemed important to tailor treatment decision for frail patients, most frail patients are not routinely evaluated by a geriatrician. Further multidisciplinary collaboration and research is necessary to optimize tailored treatment decisions for this patient group.

Cannabidiol and Its Combinations with Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Induce Apoptosis and Inhibit Activation of NF-κB Signaling in Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is a rare malignancy with a relatively good prognosis. However, the prognosis remains poor for elderly patients and those with a significant depth of tumor invasion; thus, novel treatment modalities are needed. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of cannabidiol (CBD) and its combination with NSAIDs, diclofenac (DIC) and ibuprofen (IBU) on VSCC cells. In this regard, the MTT test was applied for cytotoxicity analysis. Moreover, the influence of CBD, DIC and IBU, as well as their combinations, on apoptosis and cell cycle distribution were analyzed by flow cytometry. The mechanisms of action of the analyzed compounds, including their impact on NF-κB signaling, p53 and COX-2 expression were evaluated using Western blot. This study shows that CBD and its combinations with NSAIDs are cytotoxic to A431 cells, but they also reduce, in a dose-dependent manner, the viability of immortalized keratinocyte HaCaT cells, and human umbilical vein cell line, EA.hy926. Moreover, the compounds and their combinations induced apoptosis, diminished the NF-κB signaling activation and reduced COX-2 expression. We conclude that CBD and its combination with DIC or IBU are promising candidates for the adjuvant treatment of high-risk VSCC patients. However, their impact on non-cancerous cells requires careful evaluation.

Prognostic nomograms to predict overall survival and cause specific death in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

The incidence of vulvar squamous cell carcinoma has been rising in recent decades. The prognosis of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma was explored, and nomograms were constructed to predict survival rates.

Methods

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma patient data were downloaded from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided into a training dataset and testing dataset. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression were used to identify risk factors affecting vulvar squamous cell carcinoma overall survival in the training dataset. Cumulative incidence function and Fine–Gray regression were used to analyze cancer specific death in the training dataset. Overall survival and cancer specific death nomograms were constructed and validated in the testing and whole datasets. Receiver operating characteristic and calibration were used to verify the predictive value and clinical applicability of the models.

Results

Age ≥60 years, grade 3, American Joint Committee on Cancer stages III and IV, TNM (tumor, nodes, metastasis) stages T2, T3, N1, and M1 had a negative effect on overall survival in vulvar cancer patients. Surgery (hazard ratio (HR)=0.416, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.349 to 0.496, p<0.001) and chemotherapy (HR=0.637, 95% CI 0.544 to 0.746, p<0.001) may improve overall survival. Age, tumor grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, T stage, N stage, M stage, surgery, and chemotherapy significantly affected vulvar cancer specific death. For area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, the predictive ability of the nomograms for overall survival and cancer specific death for 1 year (area under the curve (AUC)=0.862), 3 years (AUC=0.832), and 5 years (AUC=0.808) were all >0.800.

Conclusion

The nomograms established in our study had an excellent predictive ability for overall survival and cancer specific death in vulvar cancer patients.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva: A Survival and Epidemiologic Study with Focus on Surgery and Radiotherapy

Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most frequent vulvar neoplasia. While the primary role of surgery is widely accepted, large population studies are needed to compare survival between diverse treatment modalities and to identify independent prognostic factors to help council patients and guide oncological treatment. The U.S. National Cancer Index, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program data between 2000 and 2018 was screened for all squamous cell carcinoma affecting the vulva. Raw data was processed with IBM SPSS. Demographic, clinical-pathological and treatment data were studied. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and subgroups were compared using the log rank test. A multivariate cox regression was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. A total of 11,360 patients were identified with a median age of 65. Median overall survival was 101 months. Surgery as a primary treatment is the therapeutic sequence associated with the best overall survival. Multivariate cox-regression did not meet proportional hazard assumption. Age, pathological grade, stage at diagnosis, treatment sequence and the use of chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factor. Surgery alone is the treatment sequence offering the best overall survival. Surgery should be offered to all eligible patients.

Patterns of recurrence and survival in vulvar cancer: A nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the patterns of recurrence and how these patterns are associated with survival in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. We also explored the survival impact of surgical groin staging (SGS).

METHODS

Nationwide population-based study including women diagnosed with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma between 2012 and 2015 and registered in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer. Cumulative incidence rates (CIR), recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan Meier estimates. The impact of SGS on RFS and OS was analyzed by proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

489 eligible women were included. Median follow-up time was 64 months. The overall recurrence rate was 22.3%. Site of recurrence: local in 61.0%, groin in 30.0%, distant in 9.0%. The CIR for local recurrences increased with time (5.9% at 2-years, 14.7% at 5-years) while the rate of groin and distant recurrences was nearly steady (5.5% to 6.3% and 1.5% to 1.7%, respectively). Median 2-year and 4-year OS post-recurrence was 57.8% and 37.4% for local, 17.2%, 10.3% for groin and 0% for distant recurrences, respectively. SGS was omitted in 23.7% of surgically treated women with FIGO stages IB-II and significantly associated with worse RFS (Hazard ratio, HR, 1.9; 95%CI, 1.0-3.5; p = 0.04) and OS (HR 2.0; 95%CI, 1.1-3.8; p = 0.04) after adjustment for age, FIGO stage, tumor size, resection margins and performance status.

CONCLUSION

The cumulative incidence of isolated vulvar recurrence was low but for those affected the prognosis was poor. Surgical groin staging is a crucial part of primary treatment and should not be omitted.