Using mouse models to unlock the secrets of non-synonymous RNA editing

Alterations in RNA editing in skeletal muscle following exercise training in individuals with Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease behind Alzheimer's Disease, currently affecting more than 10 million people worldwide and 1.5 times more males than females. The progression of PD results in the loss of function due to neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. The etiology of PD is multifactorial, including both genetic and environmental origins. Here we explored changes in RNA editing, specifically editing through the actions of the Adenosine Deaminases Acting on RNA (ADARs), in the progression of PD. Analysis of ADAR editing of skeletal muscle transcriptomes from PD patients and controls, including those that engaged in a rehabilitative exercise training program revealed significant differences in ADAR editing patterns based on age, disease status, and following rehabilitative exercise. Further, deleterious editing events in protein coding regions were identified in multiple genes with known associations to PD pathogenesis. Our findings of differential ADAR editing complement findings of changes in transcriptional networks identified by a recent study and offer insights into dynamic ADAR editing changes associated with PD pathogenesis.

RNA editing of AZIN1 coding sites is catalyzed by ADAR1 p150 after splicing

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing is catalyzed by nuclear adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1) p110 and ADAR2, and cytoplasmic ADAR1 p150 in mammals, all of which recognize dsRNAs as targets. RNA editing occurs in some coding regions, which alters protein functions by exchanging amino acid sequences, and is therefore physiologically significant. In general, such coding sites are edited by ADAR1 p110 and ADAR2 before splicing, given that the corresponding exon forms a dsRNA structure with an adjacent intron. We previously found that RNA editing at two coding sites of antizyme inhibitor 1 (AZIN1) is sustained in Adar1 p110/Aadr2 double KO mice. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying RNA editing of AZIN1 remain unknown. Here, we showed that Azin1 editing levels were increased upon type I interferon treatment, which activated Adar1 p150 transcription, in mouse Raw 264.7 cells. Azin1 RNA editing was observed in mature mRNA but not precursor mRNA. Furthermore, we revealed that the two coding sites were editable only by ADAR1 p150 in both mouse Raw 264.7 and human embryonic kidney 293T cells. This unique editing was achieved by forming a dsRNA structure with a downstream exon after splicing, and the intervening intron suppressed RNA editing. Therefore, deletion of a nuclear export signal from ADAR1 p150, shifting its localization to the nucleus, decreased Azin1 editing levels. Finally, we demonstrated that Azin1 RNA editing was completely absent in Adar1 p150 KO mice. Thus, these findings indicate that RNA editing of AZIN1 coding sites is exceptionally catalyzed by ADAR1 p150 after splicing.

RNA Modifications and RNA Metabolism in Neurological Disease Pathogenesis

The intrinsic cellular heterogeneity and molecular complexity of the mammalian nervous system relies substantially on the dynamic nature and spatiotemporal patterning of gene expression. These features of gene expression are achieved in part through mechanisms involving various epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation, post-translational histone modifications, and non-coding RNA activity, amongst others. In concert, another regulatory layer by which RNA bases and sugar residues are chemically modified enhances neuronal transcriptome complexity. Similar RNA modifications in other systems collectively constitute the cellular epitranscriptome that integrates and impacts various physiological processes. The epitranscriptome is dynamic and is reshaped constantly to regulate vital processes such as development, differentiation and stress responses. Perturbations of the epitranscriptome can lead to various pathogenic conditions, including cancer, cardiovascular abnormalities and neurological diseases. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies have enabled us to identify and locate modified bases/sugars on different RNA species. These RNA modifications modulate the stability, transport and, most importantly, translation of RNA. In this review, we discuss the formation and functions of some frequently observed RNA modifications—including methylations of adenine and cytosine bases, and isomerization of uridine to pseudouridine—at various layers of RNA metabolism, together with their contributions to abnormal physiological conditions that can lead to various neurodevelopmental and neurological disorders.

Regulation and functional consequences of mGlu4 RNA editing

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 4 (mGlu₄) is one of eight mGlu receptors within the Class C G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. mGlu₄ is primarily localized to the presynaptic membrane of neurons where it functions as an auto and heteroreceptor controlling synaptic release of neurotransmitter. mGlu₄ is implicated in numerous disorders and is a promising drug target; however, more remains to be understood about its regulation and pharmacology. Using high-throughput sequencing, we have validated and quantified an adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing event that converts glutamine 124 to arginine in mGlu₄; additionally, we have identified a rare but novel K129R site. Using an in vitro editing assay, we then validated the pre-mRNA duplex that allows for editing by ADAR enzymes and predicted its conservation across the mammalian species. Structural modeling of the mGlu₄ protein predicts the Q124R substitution to occur in the B helix of the receptor that is critical for receptor dimerization and activation. Interestingly, editing of a receptor homodimer does not disrupt G protein activation in response to the endogenous agonist, glutamate. Using an assay designed to specifically measure heterodimer populations at the surface, however, we found that Q124R substitution decreased the propensity of mGlu₄ to heterodimerize with mGlu₂ and mGlu₇ Our study is the first to extensively describe the extent and regulatory factors of RNA editing of mGlu₄ mRNA transcripts. In addition, we have proposed a novel functional consequence of this editing event that provides insights regarding its effects in vivo and expands the regulatory capacity for mGlu receptors.

RNA Editing in Neurological and Neurodegenerative Disorders

The brain is one of the organs that are preferentially targeted by adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, a posttranscriptional modification. This chemical modification affects neuronal development and functions at multiple levels, leading to normal brain homeostasis by increasing the complexity of the transcriptome. This includes modulation of the properties of ion channel and neurotransmitter receptors by recoding, redirection of miRNA targets by changing sequence complementarity, and suppression of immune response by altering RNA structure. Therefore, from another perspective, it appears that the brain is highly vulnerable to dysregulation of A-to-I RNA editing. Here, we focus on how aberrant A-to-I RNA editing is involved in neurological and neurodegenerative diseases of humans including epilepsy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, psychiatric disorders, developmental disorders, brain tumors, and encephalopathy caused by autoimmunity. In addition, we provide information regarding animal models to better understand the mechanisms behind disease phenotype.

Quantitative Analysis of Adenosine-to-Inosine RNA Editing

The conversion of adenosine to inosine (A to I) by RNA editing represents a common posttranscriptional mechanism for diversification of both the transcriptome and proteome, and is a part of the cellular response for innate immune tolerance. Due to its preferential base-pairing with cytosine (C), inosine (I) is recognized as guanosine (G) by reverse transcriptase, as well as the cellular splicing and translation machinery. A-to-I editing events appear as A-G discrepancies between genomic DNA and cDNA sequences. Molecular analyses of RNA editing have leveraged these nucleoside differences to quantify RNA editing in ensemble populations of RNA transcripts and within individual cDNAs using high-throughput sequencing or Sanger sequencing-derived analysis of electropherogram peak heights. Here, we briefly review and compare these methods of RNA editing quantification, as well as provide experimental protocols by which such analyses may be achieved.

A comparative analysis of ADAR mutant mice reveals site-specific regulation of RNA editing

Adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing is an essential post-transcriptional modification catalyzed by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR)1 and ADAR2 in mammals. For numerous sites in coding sequences (CDS) and microRNAs, editing is highly conserved and has significant biological consequences, for example, by altering amino acid residues and target recognition. However, no comprehensive and quantitative studies have been undertaken to determine how specific ADARs contribute to conserved sites in vivo. Here, we amplified each RNA region with editing site(s) separately and combined these for deep sequencing. Then, we compared the editing ratios of all sites that were conserved in CDS and microRNAs in the cerebral cortex and spleen of wild-type mice, Adar1^E861A/E861AIfih^-/- mice expressing inactive ADAR1 (Adar1 KI) and Adar2^-/-Gria2^R/R (Adar2 KO) mice. We found that most of the sites showed a preference for one ADAR. In contrast, some sites, such as miR-3099-3p, showed no ADAR preference. In addition, we found that the editing ratio for several sites, such as DACT3 R/G, was up-regulated in either Adar mutant mouse strain, whereas a coordinated interplay between ADAR1 and ADAR2 was required for the efficient editing of specific sites, such as the 5-HT_2CR B site. We further created double mutant Adar1 KI Adar2 KO mice and observed viable and fertile animals with the complete absence of editing, demonstrating that ADAR1 and ADAR2 are the sole enzymes responsible for all editing sites in vivo. Collectively, these findings indicate that editing is regulated in a site-specific manner by the different interplay between ADAR1 and ADAR2.

Deciphering miRNAs' Action through miRNA Editing

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs with the capability of modulating gene expression at the post-transcriptional level either by inhibiting messenger RNA (mRNA) translation or by promoting mRNA degradation. The outcome of a myriad of physiological processes and pathologies, including cancer, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, relies highly on miRNAs. However, deciphering the precise roles of specific miRNAs in these pathophysiological contexts is challenging due to the high levels of complexity of their actions. Indeed, regulation of mRNA expression by miRNAs is frequently cell/organ specific; highly dependent on the stress and metabolic status of the organism; and often poorly correlated with miRNA expression levels. Such biological features of miRNAs suggest that various regulatory mechanisms control not only their expression, but also their activity and/or bioavailability. Several mechanisms have been described to modulate miRNA action, including genetic polymorphisms, methylation of miRNA promoters, asymmetric miRNA strand selection, interactions with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) or other coding/non-coding RNAs. Moreover, nucleotide modifications (A-to-I or C-to-U) within the miRNA sequences at different stages of their maturation are also critical for their functionality. This regulatory mechanism called "RNA editing" involves specific enzymes of the adenosine/cytidine deaminase family, which trigger single nucleotide changes in primary miRNAs. These nucleotide modifications greatly influence a miRNA's stability, maturation and activity by changing its specificity towards target mRNAs. Understanding how editing events impact miRNA's ability to regulate stress responses in cells and organs, or the development of specific pathologies, e.g., metabolic diseases or cancer, should not only deepen our knowledge of molecular mechanisms underlying complex diseases, but can also facilitate the design of new therapeutic approaches based on miRNA targeting. Herein, we will discuss the current knowledge on miRNA editing and how this mechanism regulates miRNA biogenesis and activity.