Assessing Natural Product-Drug Interactions: An End-to-End Safety Framework

Safety Aspects of Herb Interactions: Current Understanding and Future Prospects

BACKGROUND

The use of herbal medicines is on the rise throughout the world due to their perceived safety profile. However, incidences of herb-drug, herb-herb and herb-food interactions considering safety aspects have opened new arenas for discussion.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aims to provide comprehensive insights into the various types of herb interactions, the mechanisms involved, their assessment, and historical developments, keeping herbal safety at the central point of discussion.

METHODS

The authors undertook a focused/targeted literature review and collected data from various databases, including Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, Springer, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Conventional literature on herbal remedies, such as those by the WHO and other international or national organizations.

RESULTS

The article considered reviewing the regulations, interaction mechanisms, and detection of herb-herb, herb-drug and herb-food interactions in commonly used yet vital plants, including Glycyrrhiza glabra, Mentha piperita, Aloe barbadensis, Zingiber officinale, Gingko biloba, Withania somnifera, etc. The study found that healthcare professionals worry about patients not informing them about their herbal prescriptions (primarily used with conventional treatment), which can cause herb-drug/herb-food/herb-herb interactions. These interactions were caused by altered pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic processes, which might be explained using in-vivo, in-vitro, in-silico, pharmacogenomics, and pharmacogenetics. Nutrivigilance may be the greatest method to monitor herb-food interactions, but its adoption is limited worldwide.

CONCLUSION

This article can serve as a lead for clinicians, guiding them regarding herb-drug, herb-food, and herb-herb interactions induced by commonly consumed plant species. Patients may also be counseled to avoid conventional drugs, botanicals, and foods with a restricted therapeutic window.

The Influence of Wuzhi Capsule on the Pharmacokinetics of Cyclophosphamide

BACKGROUND

Cyclophosphamide is approved for the treatment of a variety of tumors, yet the use of cyclophosphamide is limited by kidney and liver toxicity. In the clinic, the Wuzhi capsule is approved to attenuate cyclophosphamide toxicity in the kidney and liver.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the effects of the principal ingredients of Wuzhi capsule, schisandrin A (SIA) and schisantherin A (STA), on the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide.

METHODS

The essential pharmacokinetic data and physicochemical parameters of SIA, STA, and cyclophosphamide were collected. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of SIA, STA, and cyclophosphamide were built in Simcyp Simulator and verified using published clinical pharmacokinetic data. The verified PBPK models were used to predict potential herb-drug interactions (HDIs) between cyclophosphamide and SIA and STA in cancer patients.

RESULTS

The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of cyclophosphamide was increased by 18% and 1% when co-administered with STA and SIA at a single dose, respectively, and increased by 301% and 29% when co-administered with STA and SIA at multiple doses, respectively. The maximum concentration (Cmax) of cyclophosphamide was increased by 75% and 7% when co-administered with STA and SIA at multiple doses, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AUC and Cmax of cyclophosphamide were increased when cyclophosphamide was combined with the Wuzhi capsule, compared to cyclophosphamide alone. Our study shows that the adverse drug reactions and toxicity of cyclophosphamide should be closely monitored and an effective dosage adjustment of cyclophosphamide may need to be considered when co-administered with the Wuzhi capsule.

Potential of Bioactive Food Components against Gastric Cancer: Insights into Molecular Mechanism and Therapeutic Targets

Gastric cancer, also known as stomach cancer, is a cancer that develops from the lining of the stomach. Accumulated evidence and epidemiological studies have indicated that bioactive food components from natural products play an important role in gastric cancer prevention and treatment, although its mechanism of action has not yet been elucidated. Particularly, experimental studies have shown that natural bioactive food products display a protective effect against gastric cancer via numerous molecular mechanisms, such as suppression of cell metastasis, anti-angiogenesis, inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, and modulation of autophagy. Chemotherapy remains the standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer along with surgery, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, as well as immunotherapy, and its adverse side effects including neutropenia, stomatitis, mucositis, diarrhea, nausea, and emesis are well documented. However, administration of naturally occurring bioactive phytochemical food components could increase the efficacy of gastric chemotherapy and other chemotherapeutic resistance. Additionally, several studies have suggested that bioactive food components with structural stability, potential bioavailability, and powerful bioactivity are important to develop novel treatment strategies for gastric cancer management, which may minimize the adverse effects. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to summarize the potential therapeutic effects of natural bioactive food products on the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer with intensive molecular mechanisms of action, bioavailability, and safety efficacy.

Tetrahydrofurofuranoid Lignans, Eudesmin, Fargesin, Epimagnolin A, Magnolin, and Yangambin Inhibit UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 and 1A3 Activities in Human Liver Microsomes

Eudesmin, fargesin, epimagnolin A, magnolin, and yangambin are tetrahydrofurofuranoid lignans with various pharmacological activities found in Magnoliae Flos. The inhibition potencies of eudesmin, fargesin, epimagnolin A, magnolin, and yangambin on six major human uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) activities in human liver microsomes were evaluated using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and cocktail substrates. Eudesmin, fargesin, epimagnolin A, magnolin, and yangambin inhibited UGT1A1 and UGT1A3 activities, but showed negligible inhibition of UGT1A4, UGT16, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7 activities at 200 μM in pooled human liver microsomes. Moreover, eudesmin, fargesin, epimagnolin A, magnolin, and yangambin noncompetitively inhibited UGT1A1-catalyzed SN38 glucuronidation with K_i values of 25.7, 25.3, 3.6, 26.0, and 17.1 μM, respectively, based on kinetic analysis of UGT1A1 inhibition in pooled human liver microsomes. Conversely, the aforementioned tetrahydrofurofuranoid lignans competitively inhibited UGT1A3-catalyzed chenodeoxycholic acid 24-acyl-glucuronidation with 39.8, 24.3, 15.1, 37.6, and 66.8 μM, respectively in pooled human liver microsomes. These in vitro results suggest the necessity of evaluating whether the five tetrahydrofurofuranoid lignans can cause drug-drug interactions with UGT1A1 and UGT1A3 substrates in vivo.

Cytotoxicity of Seaweed Compounds, Alone or Combined to Reference Drugs, against Breast Cell Lines Cultured in 2D and 3D

Seaweed bioactive compounds have shown anticancer activities in in vitro and in vivo studies. However, tests remain limited, with conflicting results, and effects in combination with anticancer drugs are even scarcer. Here, the cytotoxic effects of five seaweed compounds (astaxanthin, fucoidan, fucosterol, laminarin, and phloroglucinol) were tested alone and in combination with anticancer drugs (cisplatin-Cis; and doxorubicin-Dox), in breast cell lines (three breast cancer (BC) subtypes and one non-tumoral). The combinations revealed situations where seaweed compounds presented potentiation or inhibition of the drugs' cytotoxicity, without a specific pattern, varying according to the cell line, concentration used for the combination, and drug. Fucosterol was the most promising compound, since: (i) it alone had the highest cytotoxicity at low concentrations against the BC lines without affecting the non-tumoral line; and (ii) in combination (at non-cytotoxic concentration), it potentiated Dox cytotoxicity in the triple-negative BC cell line. Using a comparative approach, monolayer versus 3D cultures, further investigation assessed effects on cell viability and proliferation, morphology, and immunocytochemistry targets. The cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects in monolayer were not observed in 3D, corroborating that cells in 3D culture are more resistant to treatments, and reinforcing the use of more complex models for drug screening and a multi-approach that should include histological and ICC analysis.

Multi-factorial pharmacokinetic interactions: unraveling complexities in precision drug therapy

Introduction: Precision drug therapy requires accounting for pertinent factors in pharmacokinetic (PK) inter-individual variability (i.e., pharmacogenetics, diseases, polypharmacy, and natural product use) that can cause sub-therapeutic or adverse effects. Although each of these individual factors can alter victim drug PK, multi-factorial interactions can cause additive, synergistic, or opposing effects. Determining the magnitude and direction of these complex multi-factorial effects requires understanding the rate-limiting redundant and/or sequential PK processes for each drug.Areas covered: Perturbations in drug-metabolizing enzymes and/or transporters are integral to single- and multi-factorial PK interactions. Examples of single factor PK interactions presented include gene-drug (pharmacogenetic), disease-drug, drug-drug, and natural product-drug interactions. Examples of multi-factorial PK interactions presented include drug-gene-drug, natural product-gene-drug, gene-gene-drug, disease-natural product-drug, and disease-gene-drug interactions. Clear interpretation of multi-factorial interactions can be complicated by study design, complexity in victim drug PK, and incomplete mechanistic understanding of victim drug PK.Expert opinion: Incorporation of complex multi-factorial PK interactions into precision drug therapy requires advances in clinical decision tools, intentional PK study designs, drug-metabolizing enzyme and transporter fractional contribution determinations, systems and computational approaches (e.g., physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling), and PK phenotyping of progressive diseases.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Predictions of the Effect of Curcumin on Metabolism of Imatinib and Bosutinib: In Vitro and In Vivo Disconnect

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the potential pharmacokinetic interactions between curcumin, imatinib and bosutinib, combining In Vitro and in silico methods.

METHODS

In Vitro metabolism of imatinib and bosutinib were investigated in pooled human liver microsomes and recombinant CYP3A4 enzyme in the presence and absence of curcumin and curcumin glucuronide using an LC-MS/MS assay for N-desmethyl metabolites. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for curcumin formulated as solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) was constructed using In Vitro glucuronidation kinetics and published clinical pharmacokinetic data. The potential effects of curcumin coadministration on systemic exposures of imatinib and bosutinib were predicted in silico using PBPK simulations.

RESULTS

Curcumin demonstrated potent reversible inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4-mediated N-demethylation of imatinib and bosutinib and CYP2C8-mediated metabolism of imatinib with inhibitory constants (k_i,u) of ≤1.5 μmol. L^-1. A confirmatory In Vitro study with paclitaxel, the 6α-hydroxylation of which is exclusively mediated by CYP2C8, was consistent with a potent inhibition of this enzyme by curcumin. Curcumin glucuronide also inhibited both CYP enzymes In Vitro, albeit to a lesser extent than that of curcumin. PBPK model simulations predicted that at recommended dosing regimens of SLN curcumin, coadministration would result in an increase in systemic exposures of imatinib and bosutinib of up to only 10%.

CONCLUSION

A PBPK model for curcumin in a SLN formulation was successfully developed. Although curcumin possesses a strong In Vitro inhibitory activity towards CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 enzymes, its interactions with imatinib and bosutinib were unlikely to be of clinical importance due to curcumin's poor bioavailability.

"Natural" is not synonymous with "Safe": Toxicity of natural products alone and in combination with pharmaceutical agents

During the 25 years since the US Congress passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), the law that transformed the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) authority to regulate dietary supplements, the dietary supplement market has grown exponentially. Retail sales of herbal products, a subcategory of dietary supplements, have increased 83% from 2008 to 2018 ($4.8 to $8.8 billion USD). Although consumers often equate "natural" with "safe", it is well recognized by scientists that constituents in these natural products (NPs) can result in toxicity. Additionally, when NPs are co-consumed with pharmaceutical agents, the precipitant NP can alter drug disposition and drug delivery, thereby enhancing or reducing the therapeutic effect of the object drug(s). With the widespread use of NPs, these effects can be underappreciated. We present a summary of a symposium presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology 2019 (12 March 2019) that discussed potential toxicities of NPs alone and in combination with drugs.

Development of a consensus approach for botanical safety evaluation - A roundtable report

Botanical safety science continues to evolve as new tools for risk assessment become available alongside continual desire by consumers for "natural" botanical ingredients in consumer products. Focusing on botanical food/dietary supplements a recent international roundtable meeting brought together scientists to discuss the needs, available tools, and ongoing data gaps in the botanical safety risk assessment process. Participants discussed the key elements of botanical safety evaluations. They provided perspective on the use of a decision tree methodology to conduct a robust risk assessment and concluded with alignment on a series of consensus statements. This discussion highlighted the strengths and vulnerabilities in common assumptions, and the participants shared additional perspective to ensure that this end-to-end safety approach is sufficient, actionable and timely. Critical areas and data gaps were identified as opportunities for future focus. These include, better context on history of use, systematic assessment of weight of evidence, use of in silico approaches, inclusion of threshold of toxicological concern considerations, individual substances/matrix interactions of plant constituents, assessing botanical-drug interactions and adaptations needed to apply to in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic modelling of botanical constituents.

Herb-drug interactions: a novel algorithm-assisted information system for pharmacokinetic drug interactions with herbal supplements in cancer treatment

PURPOSE

To develop a system to estimate the risk of herb-drug interactions that includes the available evidence from clinical and laboratory studies, transparently delineates the algorithm for the risk estimation, could be used in practice settings and allows for adaptation and update.

METHODS

We systematically searched Drugbank, Transformer, Drug Information Handbook, European and German Pharmacopoeia and MEDLINE for studies on herb-drug interactions of five common medicinal plants (coneflower, ginseng, milk thistle, mistletoe and St. John's wort). A diverse set of data were independently extracted by two researchers and subsequently analysed by a newly developed algorithm. Results are displayed in the form of interaction risk categories. The development of the algorithm was guided by an expert panel consensus process.

RESULTS

From 882 publications retrieved by the search, 154 studies were eligible and provided 529 data sets on herbal interactions. The developed algorithm prioritises results from clinical trials over case reports over in vitro investigations and considers type of study, consistency of study results and study outcome for clinical trials as well as identification, permeability, bioavailability, and interaction potency of an identified herbal perpetrator for in vitro investigations. Risk categories were assigned to and dynamically visualised in a colour-coded matrix format.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel algorithm allows to transparently generate and dynamically display herb-drug interaction risks based on the available evidence from clinical and laboratory pharmacologic studies. It provides health professionals with readily available and easy updatable information about the risk of pharmacokinetic interactions between herbs and oncologic drugs.

Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Evaluation of Botanical and Dietary Supplements

Introduction: Recent nationwide surveys found that natural products, including botanical dietary supplements, are used by ∼18% of adults. In many cases, there is a paucity of toxicological data available for these substances to allow for confident evaluations of product safety. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has received numerous nominations from the public and federal agencies to study the toxicological effects of botanical dietary supplements. The NTP sought to evaluate the utility of in vitro quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assays for toxicological assessment of botanical and dietary supplements. Materials and Methods: In brief, concentration-response assessments of 90 test substances, including 13 distinct botanical species, and individual purported active constituents were evaluated using a subset of the Tox21 qHTS testing panel. The screen included 20 different endpoints that covered a broad range of biologically relevant signaling pathways to detect test article effects upon endocrine activity, nuclear receptor signaling, stress response signaling, genotoxicity, and cell death signaling. Results and Discussion: Botanical dietary supplement extracts induced measurable and diverse activity. Elevated biological activity profiles were observed following treatments with individual chemical constituents relative to their associated botanical extract. The overall distribution of activity was comparable to activities exhibited by compounds present in the Tox21 10K chemical library. Conclusion: Botanical supplements did not exhibit minimal or idiosyncratic activities that would preclude the use of qHTS platforms as a feasible method to screen this class of compounds. However, there are still many considerations and further development required when attempting to use in vitro qHTS methods to characterize the safety profile of botanical/dietary supplements.

A Tiered Approach for the Evaluation of the Safety of Botanicals Used as Dietary Supplements: An Industry Strategy

Exposure to botanicals in dietary supplements is increasing across many geographies; with increased expectations from consumers, regulators, and industry stewards centered on quality and safety of these products. We present a tiered approach to assess the safety of botanicals, and an in silico decision tree to address toxicity data gaps. Tier 1 describes a Threshold of Toxicologic Concern (TTC) approach that can be used to assess the safety of conceptual levels of botanicals. Tier 2 is an approach to document a history of safe human use for botanical exposures higher than the TTC. An assessment of botanical-drug interaction (BDI) may also be necessary at this stage. Tier 3 involves botanical chemical constituent identification and safety assessment and the in silico approach as needed. Our novel approaches to identify potential hazards and establish safe human use levels for botanicals is cost and time efficient and minimizes reliance on animal testing.

Getting to the Root of the Matter: Challenges and Recommendations for Assessing the Safety of Botanical Dietary Supplements

The National Toxicology Program's (NTP) mission is "to evaluate agents of public health concern, by developing and applying the tools of modern toxicology and molecular biology." Botanical dietary supplements (BDS) represent agents of public health concern due to widespread exposure to high doses, a lack of safety data for most products, variable quality, and reports of adverse events. This commentary will address lessons learned in NTP testing activities with BDS and recommendations for moving forward.

Follow that botanical: Challenges and recommendations for assessing absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of botanical dietary supplements

Botanical dietary supplements are complex mixtures containing one or more botanical ingredient(s), each containing numerous constituents potentially responsible for its purported biological activity. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) data are critical to understand the safety of botanical dietary supplements, including their potential for pharmacokinetic botanical-drug or botanical-botanical interactions. However, ADME data for botanical dietary supplements are rarely available and frequently inadequate to characterize their fate in vivo. Based on an assessment of the current status of botanical dietary supplements ADME research, the following key areas are identified that require robust data for human safety assessment: 1) phytochemical characterization including contaminant analysis and botanical authentication; 2) in vitro and/or in vivo data for identifying potential botanical-botanical or botanical-drug interactions and active/marker constituents; 3) robust ADME study design to include systemic exposure data on active/marker constituents using traditional or novel analytical chemistry and statistical approaches such as poly-pharmacokinetics; and 4) investigation of human relevance. A case study with Ginkgo biloba extract is used to highlight the challenges and proposed approaches in using ADME data for human safety assessment of botanical dietary supplements.

Inhibitory Effects of Dimethyllirioresinol, Epimagnolin A, Eudesmin, Fargesin, and Magnolin on Cytochrome P450 Enzyme Activities in Human Liver Microsomes

Magnolin, epimagnolin A, dimethyllirioresinol, eudesmin, and fargesin are pharmacologically active tetrahydrofurofuranoid lignans found in Flos Magnoliae. The inhibitory potentials of dimethyllirioresinol, epimagnolin A, eudesmin, fargesin, and magnolin on eight major human cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme activities in human liver microsomes were evaluated using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to determine the inhibition mechanisms and inhibition potency. Fargesin inhibited CYP2C9-catalyzed diclofenac 4′-hydroxylation with a K_i value of 16.3 μM, and it exhibited mechanism-based inhibition of CYP2C19-catalyzed [S]-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylation (K_i, 3.7 μM; k_inact, 0.102 min⁻¹), CYP2C8-catalyzed amodiaquine N-deethylation (K_i, 10.7 μM; k_inact, 0.082 min⁻¹), and CYP3A4-catalyzed midazolam 1′-hydroxylation (K_i, 23.0 μM; k_inact, 0.050 min⁻¹) in human liver microsomes. Fargesin negligibly inhibited CYP1A2-catalyzed phenacetin O-deethylation, CYP2A6-catalyzed coumarin 7-hydroxylation, CYP2B6-catalyzed bupropion hydroxylation, and CYP2D6-catalyzed bufuralol 1′-hydroxylation at 100 μM in human liver microsomes. Dimethyllirioresinol weakly inhibited CYP2C19 and CYP2C8 with IC₅₀ values of 55.1 and 85.0 μM, respectively, without inhibition of CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 activities at 100 μM. Epimagnolin A, eudesmin, and magnolin showed no the reversible and time-dependent inhibition of eight major CYP activities at 100 μM in human liver microsomes. These in vitro results suggest that it is necessary to investigate the potentials of in vivo fargesin-drug interaction with CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 substrates.

Practical considerations when designing and conducting clinical pharmacokinetic herb–drug interaction studies

Pharmacokinetic herb–drug interaction (HDI) research has been ongoing for almost two decades and a significant body of information has been published on the subject, yet much of it is contradictory. Some of this disparity stems from the botanical dosage form itself, as product quality and dosage form performance can vary significantly among brands. Unless products are adequately characterized, HDI study results can be misleading. The purpose of this report is to identify several common weaknesses inherent in many prospective clinical HDI studies and to provide guidance in addressing these shortcomings. Topics such as study design, pharmacokinetic end points, product quality, dosage form performance, gauging clinical relevance, and efforts to minimize dietary influences while improving compliance are discussed.

Community Pharmacists' Views and Practices Regarding Natural Health Products Sold in Community Pharmacies

BACKGROUND

Reports of regulatory and evidentiary gaps have raised concerns about the marketing and use of natural health products (NHPs). The majority of NHPs offered for sale are purchased at a community pharmacy and pharmacists are "front-line" health professionals involved in the marketing and provision of NHPs. To date, the involvement of pharmacists in pharmacy care involving NHPs and the degree to which concerns over the safety, efficacy, marketing and regulation of NHPs are addressed in pharmacy care in Canada have not been studied.

METHODS

Using Qualtrics, a web-based data collection and analysis software, and a study instrument made up of fifteen (15) open-ended, closed and rating scale questions, we surveyed the attitudes and practices of 403 community pharmacists in the Canadian province of Alberta regarding NHPs offered for sale in community pharmacies.

RESULTS

The majority of pharmacists surveyed (276; 68%) recommend NHPs to clients sometimes to very often. Vitamin D, calcium, multivitamins, prenatal vitamins, probiotics and fish oil and omega-3 fatty acids were the most frequently recommended NHPs. The most common indications for which NHPs are recommended include bone and musculoskeletal disorders, maintenance of general health, gastrointestinal disorders and pregnancy. Review articles published in the Pharmacist's Letter and Canadian Pharmacists Journal were the primary basis for recommending NHPs. The majority of pharmacists surveyed (339; 84%) recommend the use of NHPs concurrently with conventional drugs, while a significant number and proportion (125; 31%) recommend alternative use. Pharmacists in the study overwhelmingly reported providing counselling on NHPs to clients based on information obtained mainly from the Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings indicate a high prevalence of pharmacy care relating to NHPs among study participants. Although pharmacists' practices around NHPs are consistent with the existing licensing framework, we found some involvement in problematic practices that necessitate further research and potential policy scrutiny. The study also uncovered patterns of recommendations, including sources relied on in recommending NHPs and in providing counselling to patients, that raise concerns about the quality and credibility of NHP-related care provided to pharmacy patrons.