1
|
Kamsani SH, Middeldorp ME, Chiang G, Stefil M, Evans S, Nguyen MT, Shahmohamadi E, Zhang JQ, Roberts-Thomson KC, Emami M, Young GD, Sanders P. Safety of outpatient commencement of sotalol. Heart Rhythm O2 2024; 5:341-350. [PMID: 38984365 PMCID: PMC11228273 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Inpatient monitoring is recommended for sotalol initiation. Objective The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of outpatient sotalol commencement. Methods This is a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of patients initiated on sotalol in an outpatient setting. Serial electrocardiogram monitoring at day 3, day 7, 1 month, and subsequently as clinically indicated was performed. Corrected QT (QTc) interval and clinical events were evaluated. Results Between 2008 and 2023, 880 consecutive patients who were commenced on sotalol were evaluated. Indications were atrial fibrillation/flutter in 87.3% (n = 768), ventricular arrhythmias in 9.9% (n = 87), and other arrhythmias in 2.8% (n = 25). The daily dosage at initiation was 131.0 ± 53.2 mg/d. The QTc interval increased from baseline (431 ± 32 ms) to 444 ± 37 ms (day 3) and 440 ± 33 ms (day 7) after sotalol initiation (P < .001). Within the first week, QTc prolongation led to the discontinuation of sotalol in 4 and dose reduction in 1. No ventricular arrhythmia, syncope, or death was observed during the first week. Dose reduction due to asymptomatic bradycardia occurred in 3 and discontinuation due to dyspnea in 3 within the first week. Overall, 1.1% developed QTc prolongation (>500 ms/>25% from baseline); 4 within 3 days, 1 within 1 week, 4 within 60 days, and 1 after >3 years. Discontinuation of sotalol due to other adverse effects occurred in 41 patients within the first month of therapy. Conclusion Sotalol initiation in an outpatient setting with protocolized follow-up is safe, with no recorded sotalol-related mortality, ventricular arrhythmias, or syncope. There was a low incidence of significant QTc prolongation necessitating discontinuation within the first month of treatment. Importantly, we observed a small incidence of late QT prolongation, highlighting the need for vigilant outpatient surveillance of individuals on sotalol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suraya H. Kamsani
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- National Heart Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Melissa E. Middeldorp
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Glenda Chiang
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Maria Stefil
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Shaun Evans
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mau T. Nguyen
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Elnaz Shahmohamadi
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jessica Qingying Zhang
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kurt C. Roberts-Thomson
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mehrdad Emami
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Glenn D. Young
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Prashanthan Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ono K, Iwasaki Y, Akao M, Ikeda T, Ishii K, Inden Y, Kusano K, Kobayashi Y, Koretsune Y, Sasano T, Sumitomo N, Takahashi N, Niwano S, Hagiwara N, Hisatome I, Furukawa T, Honjo H, Maruyama T, Murakawa Y, Yasaka M, Watanabe E, Aiba T, Amino M, Itoh H, Ogawa H, Okumura Y, Aoki‐Kamiya C, Kishihara J, Kodani E, Komatsu T, Sakamoto Y, Satomi K, Shiga T, Shinohara T, Suzuki A, Suzuki S, Sekiguchi Y, Nagase S, Hayami N, Harada M, Fujino T, Makiyama T, Maruyama M, Miake J, Muraji S, Murata H, Morita N, Yokoshiki H, Yoshioka K, Yodogawa K, Inoue H, Okumura K, Kimura T, Tsutsui H, Shimizu W. JCS/JHRS 2020 Guideline on Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias. J Arrhythm 2022; 38:833-973. [PMID: 36524037 PMCID: PMC9745564 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
3
|
Ono K, Iwasaki YK, Akao M, Ikeda T, Ishii K, Inden Y, Kusano K, Kobayashi Y, Koretsune Y, Sasano T, Sumitomo N, Takahashi N, Niwano S, Hagiwara N, Hisatome I, Furukawa T, Honjo H, Maruyama T, Murakawa Y, Yasaka M, Watanabe E, Aiba T, Amino M, Itoh H, Ogawa H, Okumura Y, Aoki-Kamiya C, Kishihara J, Kodani E, Komatsu T, Sakamoto Y, Satomi K, Shiga T, Shinohara T, Suzuki A, Suzuki S, Sekiguchi Y, Nagase S, Hayami N, Harada M, Fujino T, Makiyama T, Maruyama M, Miake J, Muraji S, Murata H, Morita N, Yokoshiki H, Yoshioka K, Yodogawa K, Inoue H, Okumura K, Kimura T, Tsutsui H, Shimizu W. JCS/JHRS 2020 Guideline on Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias. Circ J 2022; 86:1790-1924. [DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-20-1212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yu-ki Iwasaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School
| | - Masaharu Akao
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center
| | - Takanori Ikeda
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kuniaki Ishii
- Department of Pharmacology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Yasuya Inden
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kengo Kusano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Yoshinori Kobayashi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital
| | | | - Tetsuo Sasano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
| | - Naokata Sumitomo
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
| | - Naohiko Takahashi
- Department of Cardiology and Clinical Examination, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University
| | - Shinichi Niwano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Tetsushi Furukawa
- Department of Bio-information Pharmacology, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
| | - Haruo Honjo
- Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Nagoya University
| | - Toru Maruyama
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital
| | - Yuji Murakawa
- The 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Mizonokuchi Hospital
| | - Masahiro Yasaka
- Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine and Neurology, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center
| | - Eiichi Watanabe
- Department of Cardiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine
| | - Takeshi Aiba
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Mari Amino
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine
| | - Hideki Itoh
- Division of Patient Safety, Hiroshima University Hospital
| | - Hisashi Ogawa
- Department of Cardiology, National Hospital Organisation Kyoto Medical Center
| | - Yasuo Okumura
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine
| | - Chizuko Aoki-Kamiya
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Jun Kishihara
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine
| | - Eitaro Kodani
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital
| | - Takashi Komatsu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Tsuyoshi Shiga
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The Jikei University School of Medicine
| | - Tetsuji Shinohara
- Department of Cardiology and Clinical Examination, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University
| | - Atsushi Suzuki
- Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University
| | - Shinya Suzuki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Cardiovascular Institute
| | - Yukio Sekiguchi
- Department of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kasumigaura Medical Center
| | - Satoshi Nagase
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Noriyuki Hayami
- Department of Fourth Internal Medicine, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital
| | | | - Tadashi Fujino
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toho University, Faculty of Medicine
| | - Takeru Makiyama
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | - Mitsunori Maruyama
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital
| | - Junichiro Miake
- Department of Pharmacology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine
| | - Shota Muraji
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
| | | | - Norishige Morita
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital
| | - Hisashi Yokoshiki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sapporo City General Hospital
| | - Koichiro Yoshioka
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine
| | - Kenji Yodogawa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School
| | | | - Ken Okumura
- Division of Cardiology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Cardiovascular Center
| | - Takeshi Kimura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | - Hiroyuki Tsutsui
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| | - Wataru Shimizu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Biswas M, Levy A, Weber R, Tarakji K, Chung M, Noseworthy PA, Newton-Cheh C, Rosenberg MA. Multicenter Analysis of Dosing Protocols for Sotalol Initiation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2019; 25:212-218. [PMID: 31707834 DOI: 10.1177/1074248419887710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Sotalol, a Vaughan-Williams Class III antiarrhythmic medication, is used to manage atrial arrhythmias. Due to its QT-prolonging effect and subsequent increased risk of torsade de pointes, many centers admit patients during the initial dosing period. Despite its widespread use, little information is available regarding dosing protocols during this period. In this multicenter investigation, dosing protocols in patients initiating sotalol therapy were examined to identify predictors of successful sotalol initiation. Over a 4-year period, patients admitted to 5 hospitals in the United States for inpatient telemetry monitoring during initiation for nonresearch purposes were enrolled. A 3-day course of 5 of 6 doses of sotalol was considered successful completion of the loading protocol. Of the 213 enrolled patients, over 90% were successfully discharged on sotalol. Significant bradycardia, ineffectiveness, and excessive QT prolongation were reasons for failed completion. Absence of a dose adjustment was a strong predictor of successful initiation (odds ratio: 6.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-32.7, P = .02). Hypertension, use of a calcium channel blocker, use of a separate β-blocker, and presence of a pacemaker were predictors of dose adjustments. Marginal structural models (ie, inverse probability weighting based on probability of a dose adjustment) verified that these factors also predicted successful initiation via preventing any dose adjustment and suggests that considering these factors may result in a higher likelihood of successful initiation in future investigations. In conclusion, we found that the majority of patients admitted for sotalol initiation are successfully discharged on the medication. The study findings suggest that factors predicting need for dose adjustment can be used to identify patients who could undergo outpatient initiation. Prospective studies are needed to verify this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minakshi Biswas
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Andrew Levy
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rachel Weber
- Division of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Khaldoun Tarakji
- Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mina Chung
- Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Peter A Noseworthy
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Christopher Newton-Cheh
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael A Rosenberg
- Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Valembois L, Audureau E, Takeda A, Jarzebowski W, Belmin J, Lafuente‐Lafuente C. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 9:CD005049. [PMID: 31483500 PMCID: PMC6738133 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005049.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation often recurs after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been widely used to prevent recurrence. This is an update of a review previously published in 2006, 2012 and 2015. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of long-term treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs on death, stroke, drug adverse effects and recurrence of atrial fibrillation in people who had recovered sinus rhythm after having atrial fibrillation. SEARCH METHODS We updated the searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase in January 2019, and ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP in February 2019. We checked the reference lists of retrieved articles, recent reviews and meta-analyses. SELECTION CRITERIA Two authors independently selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any antiarrhythmic drug with a control (no treatment, placebo, drugs for rate control) or with another antiarrhythmic drug in adults who had atrial fibrillation and in whom sinus rhythm was restored, spontaneously or by any intervention. We excluded postoperative atrial fibrillation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. We pooled studies, if appropriate, using Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All results were calculated at one year of follow-up or the nearest time point. MAIN RESULTS This update included one new study (100 participants) and excluded one previously included study because of double publication. Finally, we included 59 RCTs comprising 20,981 participants studying quinidine, disopyramide, propafenone, flecainide, metoprolol, amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone and sotalol. Overall, mean follow-up was 10.2 months.All-cause mortalityHigh-certainty evidence from five RCTs indicated that treatment with sotalol was associated with a higher all-cause mortality rate compared with placebo or no treatment (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.81; participants = 1882). The number need to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) for sotalol was 102 participants treated for one year to have one additional death. Low-certainty evidence from six RCTs suggested that risk of mortality may be higher in people taking quinidine (RR 2.01, 95% CI 0.84 to 4.77; participants = 1646). Moderate-certainty evidence showed increased RR for mortality but with very wide CIs for metoprolol (RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.37 to 11.05, 2 RCTs, participants = 562) and amiodarone (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.55 to 4.99, 2 RCTs, participants = 444), compared with placebo.We found little or no difference in mortality with dofetilide (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence) or dronedarone (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.09; high-certainty evidence) compared to placebo/no treatment. There were few data on mortality for disopyramide, flecainide and propafenone, making impossible a reliable estimation for those drugs.Withdrawals due to adverse eventsAll analysed drugs increased withdrawals due to adverse effects compared to placebo or no treatment (quinidine: RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.78; disopyramide: RR 3.68, 95% CI 0.95 to 14.24; propafenone: RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.46; flecainide: RR 15.41, 95% CI 0.91 to 260.19; metoprolol: RR 3.47, 95% CI 1.48 to 8.15; amiodarone: RR 6.70, 95% CI 1.91 to 23.45; dofetilide: RR 1.77, 95% CI 0.75 to 4.18; dronedarone: RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.85; sotalol: RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.11). Certainty of the evidence for this outcome was low for disopyramide, amiodarone, dofetilide and flecainide; moderate to high for the remaining drugs.ProarrhythmiaVirtually all studied antiarrhythmics showed increased proarrhythmic effects (counting both tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias attributable to treatment) (quinidine: RR 2.05, 95% CI 0.95 to 4.41; disopyramide: no data; flecainide: RR 4.80, 95% CI 1.30 to 17.77; metoprolol: RR 18.14, 95% CI 2.42 to 135.66; amiodarone: RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.71 to 6.96; dofetilide: RR 5.50, 95% CI 1.33 to 22.76; dronedarone: RR 1.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 4.98; sotalol: RR 3.55, 95% CI 2.16 to 5.83); with the exception of propafenone (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.47) for which the certainty of evidence was very low and we were uncertain about the effect. Certainty of the evidence for this outcome for the other drugs was moderate to high.StrokeEleven studies reported stroke outcomes with quinidine, disopyramide, flecainide, amiodarone, dronedarone and sotalol. High-certainty evidence from two RCTs suggested that dronedarone may be associated with reduced risk of stroke (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.95; participants = 5872). This result is attributed to one study dominating the meta-analysis and has yet to be reproduced in other studies. There was no apparent effect on stroke rates with the other antiarrhythmics.Recurrence of atrial fibrillationModerate- to high-certainty evidence, with the exception of disopyramide which was low-certainty evidence, showed that all analysed drugs, including metoprolol, reduced recurrence of atrial fibrillation (quinidine: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.88; disopyramide: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.01; propafenone: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.74; flecainide: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.77; metoprolol: RR 0.83 95% CI 0.68 to 1.02; amiodarone: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.58; dofetilide: RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85; dronedarone: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.91; sotalol: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.87). Despite this reduction, atrial fibrillation still recurred in 43% to 67% of people treated with antiarrhythmics. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is high-certainty evidence of increased mortality associated with sotalol treatment, and low-certainty evidence suggesting increased mortality with quinidine, when used for maintaining sinus rhythm in people with atrial fibrillation. We found few data on mortality in people taking disopyramide, flecainide and propafenone, so it was not possible to make a reliable estimation of the mortality risk for these drugs. However, we did find moderate-certainty evidence of marked increases in proarrhythmia and adverse effects with flecainide.Overall, there is evidence showing that antiarrhythmic drugs increase adverse events, increase proarrhythmic events and some antiarrhythmics may increase mortality. Conversely, although they reduce recurrences of atrial fibrillation, there is no evidence of any benefit on other clinical outcomes, compared with placebo or no treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Valembois
- Groupe Hospitalier Pitié‐Salpêtrière‐Charles Foix, AP‐HP, Université Pierre et Marie CurieService de Gériatrie à Orientation Cardiologique et Neurologique7 avenue de la RépubliqueIvry‐sur‐SeineFrance94200
| | - Etienne Audureau
- Hôpital Henri‐Mondor, APHP, Université Paris 12 UPECService de Santé Publique51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de TassignyCréteilFrance94010
| | - Andrea Takeda
- University College LondonInstitute of Health Informatics ResearchLondonUK
| | | | - Joël Belmin
- Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6)La Triade ‐ Service Hospitalo‐Universitaire de GérontologieGroup Hospitalier Pitié‐Salpêtrière‐Charles Foix7, Avenue de la République, 94 Ivry‐sur‐SeineParisFrance
| | - Carmelo Lafuente‐Lafuente
- Groupe Hospitalier Pitié‐Salpêtrière‐Charles Foix, AP‐HP, Université Pierre et Marie CurieService de Gériatrie à Orientation Cardiologique et Neurologique7 avenue de la RépubliqueIvry‐sur‐SeineFrance94200
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Katritsis DG, Boriani G, Cosio FG, Hindricks G, Jaïs P, Josephson ME, Keegan R, Kim YH, Knight BP, Kuck KH, Lane DA, Lip GYH, Malmborg H, Oral H, Pappone C, Themistoclakis S, Wood KA, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Gorenek B, Dagres N, Dan GA, Vos MA, Kudaiberdieva G, Crijns H, Roberts-Thomson K, Lin YJ, Vanegas D, Caorsi WR, Cronin E, Rickard J. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document on the management of supraventricular arrhythmias, endorsed by Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardiaca y Electrofisiologia (SOLAECE). Europace 2018; 19:465-511. [PMID: 27856540 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Demosthenes G Katritsis
- Athens Euroclinic, Athens, Greece; and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Department, Modena University Hospital, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierre Jaïs
- University of Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, LIRYC, France
| | | | - Roberto Keegan
- Hospital Privado del Sur y Hospital Español, Bahia Blanca, Argentina
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Deirdre A Lane
- Asklepios Hospital St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.,University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Science, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK; and Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Science, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK; and Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Helena Malmborg
- Department of Cardiology and Medical Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Hakan Oral
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Carlo Pappone
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Bulent Gorenek
- Cardiology Department, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | | | - Gheorge-Andrei Dan
- Colentina University Hospital, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Marc A Vos
- Department of Medical Physiology, Division Heart and Lungs, Umc Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harry Crijns
- Mastricht University Medical Centre, Cardiology & CARIM, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Diego Vanegas
- Hospital Militar Central - Unidad de Electrofisiologìa - FUNDARRITMIA, Bogotà, Colombia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Health care utilization among adenosine-sensitive supraventricular tachycardia patients presenting to the emergency department. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2017; 49:103-109. [DOI: 10.1007/s10840-017-0259-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Our approach to the ablation of atrioventricular nodal reciprocating tachycardia (AVNRT), the most common supraventricular tachycardia, is as follows: We first attempt ablation in the right atrial posteroseptum anterior to the coronary sinus ostium with a 4-mm non-irrigated tip catheter. If ablation within the triangle of Koch is unsuccessful with radiofrequency (RF), we switch to cryoablation and target a more superior (mid septal) region. We also utilize cryoablation if RF ablation produces transient VA block (absence of retrograde conduction during junctional rhythm) or a fast junctional rhythm (<350 msec). If cryoablation were to fail, or is not available, we would then suggest ablation within the coronary sinus targeting the roof (2-4 cm from the os) using a 3.5-mm irrigated tip catheter. If tachycardia were still inducible despite these measures, we would then proceed with transseptal puncture (given our greater experience with this over a retrograde aortic approach) and perform RF ablation along the posteroseptal left atrium and inferoseptal mitral annulus utilizing an irrigated tip catheter. In our experience, cryoablation reliably results in elimination of the slow pathway. The only left atrial ablation for AVNRT at our institution in the past year was performed because a patent foramen ovale allowed for rapid left atrial access, facilitating left atrial ablation of the slow pathway.
Collapse
|
9
|
Katritsis DG, Zografos T, Katritsis GD, Giazitzoglou E, Vachliotis V, Paxinos G, Camm AJ, Josephson ME. Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with symptomatic atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia: a randomized, controlled trial. Europace 2017; 19:602-606. [PMID: 28431060 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euw064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To conduct a randomized trial in order to guide the optimum therapy of symptomatic atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with at least one symptomatic episode of tachycardia per month and an electrophysiologic diagnosis of AVNRT were randomly assigned to catheter ablation or chronic antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy with bisoprolol (5 mg od) and/or diltiazem (120-300 mg od). All patients were properly educated to treat subsequent tachycardia episodes with autonomic manoeuvres or a 'pill in the pocket' approach. The primary endpoint of the study was hospital admission for persistent tachycardia cardioversion, during a follow-up period of 5 years. Sixty-one patients were included in the study. In the ablation group, 1 patient was lost to follow-up, and 29 were free of arrhythmia or conduction disturbances at a 5-year follow-up. In the AAD group, three patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remainder, 10 patients (35.7%) continued with initial therapy, 11 patients (39.2%) remained on diltiazem alone, and 7 patients (25%) interrupted their therapy within the first 3 months following randomization, and subsequently developed an episode requiring cardioversion. During a follow-up of 5 years, 21 patients in the AAD group required hospital admission for cardioversion. Survival free from the study endpoint was significantly higher in the ablation group compared with the AAD group (log-rank test, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Catheter ablation is the therapy of choice for symptomatic AVNRT. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is ineffective and not well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Demosthenes G Katritsis
- Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 185 Pilgrim Rd, Baker 4, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Athens Euroclinic, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | - A John Camm
- St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Mark E Josephson
- Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 185 Pilgrim Rd, Baker 4, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, Calkins H, Conti JB, Deal BJ, Estes NM, Field ME, Goldberger ZD, Hammill SC, Indik JH, Lindsay BD, Olshansky B, Russo AM, Shen WK, Tracy CM, Al-Khatib SM. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia. Circulation 2016; 133:e506-74. [DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Hugh Calkins
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Jamie B. Conti
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Barbara J. Deal
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - N.A. Mark Estes
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Michael E. Field
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Zachary D. Goldberger
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Stephen C. Hammill
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Julia H. Indik
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Bruce D. Lindsay
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Brian Olshansky
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Andrea M. Russo
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Win-Kuang Shen
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Cynthia M. Tracy
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information. HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, Calkins H, Conti JB, Deal BJ, Estes NM, Field ME, Goldberger ZD, Hammill SC, Indik JH, Lindsay BD, Olshansky B, Russo AM, Shen WK, Tracy CM, Al-Khatib SM. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: Executive Summary. Circulation 2016; 133:e471-505. [DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Hugh Calkins
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Jamie B. Conti
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Barbara J. Deal
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - N.A. Mark Estes
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Michael E. Field
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Zachary D. Goldberger
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Stephen C. Hammill
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Julia H. Indik
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Bruce D. Lindsay
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Brian Olshansky
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Andrea M. Russo
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Win-Kuang Shen
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | - Cynthia M. Tracy
- Writing committee members are required to recuse themselves from voting on sections to which their specific relationships with industry and other entities may apply; see Appendix 1 for recusal information.HRS Representative. ACC/AHA Representative. ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures Liaison. ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Liaison. Former Task Force member; current member during this writing effort
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: Executive Summary. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67:1575-1623. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
13
|
Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, Calkins H, Conti JB, Deal BJ, Estes III NM, Field ME, Goldberger ZD, Hammill SC, Indik JH, Lindsay BD, Olshansky B, Russo AM, Shen WK, Tracy CM, Al-Khatib SM. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm 2016; 13:e136-221. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
14
|
Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, Calkins H, Conti JB, Deal BJ, Estes NAM, Field ME, Goldberger ZD, Hammill SC, Indik JH, Lindsay BD, Olshansky B, Russo AM, Shen WK, Tracy CM, Al-Khatib SM. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: Executive summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm 2015; 13:e92-135. [PMID: 26409097 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
15
|
Page RL, Joglar JA, Caldwell MA, Calkins H, Conti JB, Deal BJ, Estes NAM, Field ME, Goldberger ZD, Hammill SC, Indik JH, Lindsay BD, Olshansky B, Russo AM, Shen WK, Tracy CM, Al-Khatib SM. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 67:e27-e115. [PMID: 26409259 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
16
|
Lafuente-Lafuente C, Valembois L, Bergmann JF, Belmin J. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD005049. [PMID: 25820938 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005049.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation frequently recurs after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been widely used to prevent recurrence, but the effect of these drugs on mortality and other clinical outcomes is unclear. This is an update of a review previously published in 2008 and 2012. OBJECTIVES To determine in patients who have recovered sinus rhythm after having atrial fibrillation, the effects of long-term treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs on death, stroke, embolism, drug adverse effects and recurrence of atrial fibrillation. SEARCH METHODS We updated the searches of CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library (2013, Issue 12 of 12), MEDLINE (to January 2014) and EMBASE (to January 2014). The reference lists of retrieved articles, recent reviews and meta-analyses were checked. SELECTION CRITERIA Two independent authors selected randomised controlled trials comparing any antiarrhythmic drug with a control (no treatment, placebo, drugs for rate control) or with another antiarrhythmic drug in adults who had atrial fibrillation and in whom sinus rhythm was restored. Post-operative atrial fibrillation was excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. Studies were pooled, if appropriate, using Peto odds ratio (OR). All results were calculated at one year of follow-up. MAIN RESULTS In this update three new studies, with 534 patients, were included making a total of 59 included studies comprising 21,305 patients. All included studies were randomised controlled trials. Allocation concealment was adequate in 17 trials, it was unclear in the remaining 42 trials. Risk of bias was assessed in all domains only in the trials included in this update.Compared with controls, class IA drugs quinidine and disopyramide (OR 2.39, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.03 to 5.59, number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) 109, 95% CI 34 to 4985) and sotalol (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.50, NNTH 169, 95% CI 60 to 2068) were associated with increased all-cause mortality. Other antiarrhythmics did not seem to modify mortality, but our data could be underpowered to detect mild increases in mortality for several of the drugs studied.Several class IA (disopyramide, quinidine), IC (flecainide, propafenone) and III (amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone, sotalol) drugs significantly reduced recurrence of atrial fibrillation (OR 0.19 to 0.70, number needed to treat to beneft (NNTB) 3 to 16). Beta-blockers (metoprolol) also significantly reduced atrial fibrillation recurrences (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.88, NNTB 9).All analysed drugs increased withdrawals due to adverse affects and all but amiodarone, dronedarone and propafenone increased pro-arrhythmia. Only 11 trials reported data on stroke. None of them found any significant difference with the exception of a single trial than found less strokes in the group treated with dronedarone compared to placebo. This finding was not confirmed in others studies on dronedarone.We could not analyse heart failure and use of anticoagulation because few original studies reported on these measures. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Several class IA, IC and III drugs, as well as class II drugs (beta-blockers), are moderately effective in maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation. However, they increase adverse events, including pro-arrhythmia, and some of them (disopyramide, quinidine and sotalol) may increase mortality. Possible benefits on clinically relevant outcomes (stroke, embolism, heart failure) remain to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Lafuente-Lafuente
- Service de Gériatrie à Orientation Cardiologique et Neurologique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, AP-HP, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 Avenue de la République, Ivry-sur-Seine, Ile-de-France, France, 94205
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lafuente-Lafuente C, Longas-Tejero MA, Bergmann JF, Belmin J. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012:CD005049. [PMID: 22592700 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005049.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. AF recurs frequently after restoration of normal sinus rhythm. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been widely used to prevent recurrence, but the effect of these drugs on mortality and other clinical outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVES To determine, in patients who recovered sinus rhythm after AF, the effect of long-term treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs on death, stroke and embolism, adverse effects, pro-arrhythmia, and recurrence of AF. SEARCH METHODS We updated the searches of CENTRAL on The Cochrane Libary (Issue 1 of 4, 2010), MEDLINE (1950 to February 2010) and EMBASE (1966 to February 2010). The reference lists of retrieved articles, recent reviews and meta-analyses were checked. SELECTION CRITERIA Two independent reviewers selected randomised controlled trials comparing any antiarrhythmic with a control (no treatment, placebo or drugs for rate control) or with another antiarrhythmic, in adults who had AF and in whom sinus rhythm was restored. Post-operative AF was excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently assessed quality and extracted data. Studies were pooled, if appropriate, using Peto odds ratio (OR). All results were calculated at one year of follow-up. MAIN RESULTS In this update, 11 new studies met inclusion criteria, making a total of 56 included studies, comprising 20,771 patients. Compared with controls, class IA drugs quinidine and disopyramide (OR 2.39, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.03 to 5.59, number needed to harm (NNH) 109, 95%CI 34 to 4985) and sotalol (OR 2.47, 95%CI 1.2 to 5.05, NNH 166, 95%CI 61 to 1159) were associated with increased all-cause mortality. Other antiarrhythmics did not seem to modify mortality.Several class IA (disopyramide, quinidine), IC (flecainide, propafenone) and III (amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone, sotalol) drugs significantly reduced recurrence of AF (OR 0.19 to 0.70, number needed to treat (NNT) 3 to 16). Beta-blockers (metoprolol) also reduced significantly AF recurrence (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.88, NNT 9).All analysed drugs increased withdrawals due to adverse affects and all but amiodarone, dronedarone and propafenone increased pro-arrhythmia. We could not analyse other outcomes because few original studies reported them. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Several class IA, IC and III drugs, as well as class II (beta-blockers), are moderately effective in maintaining sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation. However, they increase adverse events, including pro-arrhythmia, and some of them (disopyramide, quinidine and sotalol) may increase mortality. Possible benefits on clinically relevant outcomes (stroke, embolisms, heart failure) remain to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Lafuente-Lafuente
- Service deGériatrie à orientation Cardiologique etNeurologique, Groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, AP-HP,UniversitéPierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL, Kay GN, Le Huezey JY, Lowe JE, Olsson SB, Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL, Wann LS. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Updates Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation 2011; 123:e269-367. [PMID: 21382897 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0b013e318214876d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 595] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
19
|
Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL, Kay GN, Le Huezey JY, Lowe JE, Olsson SB, Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL, Wann LS. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Updates Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:e101-98. [PMID: 21392637 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 642] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
20
|
Singla S, Karam P, Deshmukh AJ, Mehta J, Paydak H. Review of contemporary antiarrhythmic drug therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2011; 17:12-20. [PMID: 21335483 DOI: 10.1177/1074248410397195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common rhythm disturbance seen in clinical practice, and its prevalence and incidence are rising rapidly as the population ages with its attendant complications. Management of AF involves anticoagulation, and fortunately new drugs for long-term anticoagulation are now available. Maintenance of sinus rhythm, though intuitively better than rate control strategy, has not been shown to offer mortality benefit. Still, maintenance of sinus rhythm is considered an appropriate therapeutic strategy when symptoms are not adequately controlled with rate control. Though significant advances have been made in ablation techniques for AF, pharmacological therapy is still the first line of treatment for rate control and maintenance of sinus rhythm, given ease of use, noninvasive nature, and limited experience with catheter-based ablation techniques. Class IC and III agents (Vaughan Williams classification) form the backbone for pharmacological maintenance of sinus rhythm. Dronedarone, a recently approved class III agent, provides a significant advance because of its relatively safe side effect profile. Currently drugs with selective atrial channels blocking properties, like Vernakalant, are being tested in trials and may provide an opportunity to maintain sinus rhythm with limited toxicity. Large trials are also being conducted to better define the efficacy of catheter-based ablation strategy as first-line treatment. Here, we review the current status of commonly used antiarrhythmic medications for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in AF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandeep Singla
- Cardiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gillis AM, Verma A, Talajic M, Nattel S, Dorian P. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines 2010: Rate and Rhythm Management. Can J Cardiol 2011; 27:47-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2010.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2010] [Accepted: 12/03/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
22
|
Spector P, Reynolds MR, Calkins H, Sondhi M, Xu Y, Martin A, Williams CJ, Sledge I. Meta-analysis of ablation of atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104:671-7. [PMID: 19699343 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2008] [Revised: 04/21/2009] [Accepted: 04/21/2009] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of typical atrial flutter (AFL) and atrioventricular node-dependent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in adult patients. Medline and EMBASE were searched (1990 to 2007) for all study design trials of RFA. Data relating to single- and multiple-procedure success, arrhythmia recurrence, repeat ablation, adverse events, and death were extracted. For RFA in AFL, 18 primary studies with 22 treatment arms and 1,323 patients were identified. Single-procedure success for AFL was 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.4% to 94.9%). Multiple-procedure success was 97.0% (95% CI 94.7% to 99.4%). Postablation arrhythmia was noted in 13.2% of patients (95% CI 7.5% to 18.9%), while repeat ablation was reported in 8% (95% CI 4.5% to 11.4%). For RFA of SVT, 39 primary studies with 49 treatment arms in 7,693 patients with accessory pathways and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia were identified. Single-procedure success for SVT was 93.2% (95% CI 90.8% to 95.5%). Multiple-procedure success was 94.6% (95% CI 92.4% to 96.9). Postablation arrhythmia was noted in 5.6% patients (95% CI 4.1% to 7.2%). Repeat ablation occurred in 6.5% (95% CI 4.7% to 8.3%). For AFL studies, all-cause mortality was 0.6%, and adverse events were reported in 0.5% of patients. For SVT studies, all-cause mortality was 0.1%, and adverse events were reported in 2.9% of patients. In conclusion, studies of RFA for the treatment of patients with AFL and SVT report high efficacy rates and low rates of complications.
Collapse
|
23
|
Gjesdal K. Non-investigational antiarrhythmic drugs: long-term use and limitations. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2009; 8:345-55. [DOI: 10.1517/14740330902927647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
24
|
Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mouly S, Longas-Tejero MA, Bergmann JF. Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD005049. [PMID: 17943835 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005049.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. After restoration of normal sinus rhythm, the recurrence rate of AF is high. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been widely used to prevent recurrence, but the effect of these drugs on mortality and other clinical outcomes is unclear. OBJECTIVES To determine, in patients who recovered sinus rhythm after AF, the effect of long-term treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs on death, stroke and embolism, adverse effects, pro-arrhythmia and recurrence of AF. If several antiarrhythmics were effective our secondary aim was to compare them. SEARCH STRATEGY The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Libary (Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1950 to May 2005) and EMBASE (1966 to May 2005) were searched. The reference lists of retrieved articles, recent reviews and meta-analyses were checked. No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA Two independent reviewers selected randomised controlled trials comparing any antiarrhythmic with a control (no treatment, placebo or drugs for rate control) or with another antiarrhythmic, in adults who had AF and in whom sinus rhythm was restored. Post-operative AF was excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently assessed quality and extracted data, on an intention-to-treat basis. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Studies were pooled, if appropriate, using Peto odds ratio (OR). MAIN RESULTS 45 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 12,559 patients. All results were calculated at 1 year of follow-up. Class IA drugs (disopyramide, quinidine) were associated with increased mortality compared with controls (OR 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 5.59, P = 0.04, number needed to harm (NNH) 109, 95% CI 34 to 4985). Other antiarrhythmics did not modify mortality. Several class IA (disopyramide, quinidine), IC (flecainide, propafenone) and III (amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone, sotalol) drugs significantly reduced recurrence of AF (OR 0.19 to 0.60, number needed to treat 2 to 9), but all increased withdrawals due to adverse affects (NNH 17 to 36) and all but amiodarone and propafenone increased pro-arrhythmia (NNH 17 to 119). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Several class IA, IC and III drugs are effective in maintaining sinus rhythm but increase adverse events, including pro-arrhythmia, and disopyramide and quinidine are associated with increased mortality. Any benefit on clinically relevant outcomes (embolisms, heart failure, mortality) remains to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Lafuente-Lafuente
- Hôpital Lariboisière, Service de Médecine Interne A, 2, rue ambroise Paré, Paris, France, 75010.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The associated hemodynamic changes can lead to symptoms of palpitations, fatigue, light-headedness, or dyspnea. Extensive research in the use of antiarrhythmic drugs has been performed both to facilitate the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and to maintain normal sinus rhythm. The relative merits of a rhythm control versus rate control strategy are briefly discussed. Efficacy of the available agents for pharmacologic cardioversion is reviewed in detail. Important drugs for maintenance of sinus rhythm include amiodarone, flecainide, propafenone, sotalol, and dofetilide. Selection of the appropriate antiarrhythmic drug must be individualized to the clinical situation, with Class IC drugs being first-line agents in the absence of structural heart disease. Regardless of agent selected, appropriate monitoring for development of adverse effects is of utmost importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd Rudo
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Main Line Health Heart Center, Lankenau Hospital, 100 Lancaster Avenue, MOB East, Suite 558, Wynnewood, PA 19096, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Halperin JL, Le Heuzey JY, Kay GN, Lowe JE, Olsson SB, Prystowsky EN, Tamargo JL, Wann S, Smith SC, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Camm AJ, Dean V, Deckers JW, Despres C, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo JL, Zamorano JL. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2006; 114:e257-354. [PMID: 16908781 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.177292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1381] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
27
|
|
28
|
Tada H, Kurosaki K, Ito S, Naito S, Yamada M, Miyaji K, Hashimoto T, Yoshimura Y, Nogami A, Oshima S, Taniguchi K. Left Atrial and Pulmonary Vein Ostial Ablation as a New Treatment for Curing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Initial Experience and Results. Circ J 2005; 69:1057-63. [PMID: 16127186 DOI: 10.1253/circj.69.1057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Segmental pulmonary vein (PV) isolation has been performed to eliminate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, this technique is not effective in most patients with persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS Left atrial catheter ablation (LACA) was performed by encircling the left- and right-sided PV 1-2 cm from the ostia, guided by an electroanatomical mapping system in 16 patients with persistent AF (>1 month). Twelve patients (75%) had a history of unsuccessful transthoracic cardioversion and prophylactic antiarrhythmic drugs. Ablation lines were also created in the mitral isthmus and posterior LA. PV isolation was also performed for each PV if there were residual PV potentials after the LACA. After LACA, 38 PV (59%) were completely isolated, and complete PV isolation was achieved with only a few radiofrequency energy applications (2.7+/-2.0 min) on a narrow area of the PV ostium (24+/-15%) in the remaining PV. The mean procedure time was 200+/-38 min. During the follow-up period (17+/-3 months), 12 patients (75%) had normal sinus rhythm and were free of symptomatic AF with (n = 10) or without antiarrhythmic drugs (n = 2). One patient had a stroke just after the procedure. No other complications including PV narrowing (>50%) occurred. CONCLUSION This approach was effective in persistent AF, however, concomitant use of antiarrhythmic drugs was often required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Tada
- Division of Cardiology, Gunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center, Maebashi, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gould PA, Power J, Broughton A, Kaye DM. Review of the current management of atrial fibrillation. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2003; 4:1889-99. [PMID: 14596645 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.4.11.1889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Its prevalence is increasing and accordingly, so is its burden on healthcare systems throughout the world. The pathophysiology of AF is complex and poorly understood, which of itself presents a major challenge to the management of this important condition. AF is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with underlying left ventricular dysfunction. Once AF occurs, it is often difficult to 'cure' and as such, the major focus of therapy is currently divided essentially between a rate control strategy and a need to revert to and maintain sinus rhythm. Both approaches seek to minimise the associated symptoms and complications. Over the past two decades, numerous pharmacological approaches to the management of AF have been employed, many of which have been shown to be relatively ineffective or confounded by major complications. Accordingly, recent research and interest has focused on non-pharmacological electrophysiological therapies to either cure AF or improve symptoms. This review summarises the current approaches to the management AF and provides some new insights into emerging therapies for this common clinical problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Gould
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd, Melbourne 3004, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Blomström-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Camm AJ, Campbell WB, Haines DE, Kuck KH, Lerman BB, Miller DD, Shaeffer CW, Stevenson WG, Tomaselli GF, Antman EM, Smith SC, Alpert JS, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Gregoratos G, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Russell RO, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Burgos EF, Cowie M, Deckers JW, Garcia MAA, Klein WW, Lekakis J, Lindahl B, Mazzotta G, Morais JCA, Oto A, Smiseth O, Trappe HJ. ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias—Executive Summary. Circulation 2003; 108:1871-909. [PMID: 14557344 DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000091380.04100.84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 312] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
31
|
Blomström-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Camm AJ, Campbell WB, Haines DE, Kuck KH, Lerman BB, Miller DD, Shaeffer CW, Stevenson WG, Tomaselli GF, Antman EM, Smith SC, Alpert JS, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Gregoratos G, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Russell RO, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Burgos EF, Cowie M, Deckers JW, Garcia MAA, Klein WW, Lekakis J, Lindahl B, Mazzotta G, Morais JCA, Oto A, Smiseth O, Trappe HJ. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias∗∗This document does not cover atrial fibrillation; atrial fibrillation is covered in the ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation found on the ACC, AHA, and ESC Web sites.—executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42:1493-531. [PMID: 14563598 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 379] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
MESH Headings
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use
- Atrial Flutter/diagnosis
- Atrial Flutter/therapy
- Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
- Catheter Ablation
- Costs and Cost Analysis
- Diagnosis, Differential
- Electrocardiography
- Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac
- Female
- Heart Conduction System/physiopathology
- Heart Defects, Congenital/complications
- Humans
- Male
- Pregnancy
- Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/diagnosis
- Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/therapy
- Quality of Life
- Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry/diagnosis
- Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry/therapy
- Tachycardia, Ectopic Atrial/diagnosis
- Tachycardia, Ectopic Atrial/therapy
- Tachycardia, Ectopic Junctional/diagnosis
- Tachycardia, Ectopic Junctional/therapy
- Tachycardia, Paroxysmal/diagnosis
- Tachycardia, Paroxysmal/therapy
- Tachycardia, Sinus/diagnosis
- Tachycardia, Sinus/therapy
- Tachycardia, Supraventricular/diagnosis
- Tachycardia, Supraventricular/epidemiology
- Tachycardia, Supraventricular/therapy
Collapse
|
32
|
Waldo AL. Long-term pharmacologic management of atrial fibrillation in the elderly. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY 2002; 11:233-44; quiz 244-6. [PMID: 12091772 DOI: 10.1111/j.1076-7460.2002.00033.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The first decision to be made in treating atrial fibrillation in the elderly is to determine whether to pursue a treatment strategy of rate control or rhythm control. Both strategies require use of anticoagulation therapy with warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.5; range 2-3). If a decision is made for rhythm control, the critical therapy is almost always with an antiarrhythmic drug. Before selecting an antiarrhythmic drug for use, it is first necessary to determine the presence or absence of underlying structural heart disease, as that will affect the available options for antiarrhythmic drug use. If there is no underlying structural heart disease, any of the available antiarrhythmic drugs may be used, although a clinically reasoned approach is suggested. If there is underlying structural heart disease, not all antiarrhythmic drugs are appropriate for use. A clinically reasoned approach is suggested in the presence of coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction /congestive heart failure, or hypertension based largely on the risk/benefit profile of the drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert L Waldo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest arrhythmia. It presents in distinct patterns of paroxysmal, persistent and chronic AF, and patient management aims differ according to the pattern. In paroxysmal AF, drug treatment with beta-blockers, class Ic and class III agents reduce the frequency and duration of episodes. In persistent AF (recent onset, non-paroxysmal), early cardioversion with either pharmacological agents or by direct current (DC) cardioversion should be actively considered, in those patients who are suitable. Patients most likely to cardiovert and remain in sinus rhythm include those with duration of AF of <1 year, an acute reversible cause, left atrial diameter <50 mm and good left ventricular function on echocardiography. Recent data show that maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful cardioversion is enhanced by the use of class III drugs including amiodarone and dofetilide. In chronic or permanent AF, management is aimed at controlling the ventricular rate response with combinations of digoxin, beta-blockers and calcium antagonists with atrio-ventricular nodal activity (diltiazem and verapamil). There is some debate about the prognostic significance of AF. Certainly AF is associated with an excess mortality but this is largely accounted for by its association with serious intrinsic heart disease and the thrombo-embolic complications of the arrhythmia. Atrial fibrillation is a common default arrhythmia for the sick heart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Channer
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, England
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tsikouris JP, Cox CD. A review of class III antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation: maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21:1514-29. [PMID: 11765303 DOI: 10.1592/phco.21.20.1514.34484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
A noteworthy shift from class I to class III antiarrhythmic agents for suppression of atrial fibrillation has occurred. Sotalol, amiodarone, and dofetilide have been evaluated for their ability to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. All of these agents are moderately effective; however, amiodarone appears to be most efficacious. Aside from their common class III actions, these agents have profoundly different pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, safety, and drug interaction profiles that help guide drug selection. Amiodarone and dofetilide are safe in patients who have had a myocardial infarction and those with heart failure. The safety of commercially available d,l-sotalol in these patients is poorly understood. Torsades de pointes is the most serious adverse effect of sotalol and dofetilide, and risk increases with renal dysfunction. Amiodarone has minimal proarrhythmic risk but has numerous noncardiac toxicities that require frequent monitoring. Overall, an ideal antiarrhythmic agent does not exist, and drug selection should be highly individualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Tsikouris
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Texas Tech University School of Pharmacy, Lubbock 79430, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited experience on sotalol use in the management of childhood arrhythmias. This study reviews the results of our experience with oral sotalol for treatment and prevention of tachyarrhythmias in children. METHODS The records of 62 patients (27 female, 35 male, mean age: 8.5+/-5.3 years) treated with sotalol for supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias from 1994 to 1999 at our institution were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, echocardiographic, electrocardiographic (ECG), ambulatory ECG and electrophysiologic variables were collected. RESULTS Forty-two (63.6%) patients had re-entrant supraventricular tachycardia, eight patients (12.9%) had atrial tachycardia, one patient (1.6%) had junctional ectopic tachycardia, four patients (6.5%) had ventricular tachycardia, and seven patients (11.3%) had complex ventricular arrhythmias, as evidenced by surface or ambulatory ECG records; or revealed during the electrophysiological study. The mean sotalol dose was 3.9+/-1.2 mg/kg per day. In 15.5+/-13.9 months of sotalol use 50% (n=31) had complete relief of symptoms and/or arrhythmia and 29% (n=18) had partial relief. Sotalol was ineffective in 20% (n=13). Sotalol was more effective in re-entrant type supraventricular tachycardias (P=0.012). Sotalol was the first choice in 35.5% of patients. The sotalol therapy was initiated in inpatient settings in 40.3% (25 patients). Complications due to sotalol were seen in six patients (five patients developed bradycardia/pauses, and one patient had torsades de pointes) for which the sotalol dose was modified. In patients with sick sinus syndrome, a pacemaker was implanted and in another patient sotalol was stopped. CONCLUSION Sotalol, being an effective and safe drug particularly in children, is a good therapeutic alternative for the preventive treatment of childhood tachyarrhythmias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Celiker
- Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Ihsan Doğramaci Children's Hospital, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fuster V, Rydén LE, Asinger RW, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Frye RL, Halperin JL, Kay G, Klein WW, Lévy S, McNamara RL, Prystowsky EN, Wann L, Wyse D, Gibbons RJ, Antman EM, Alpert JS, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gregoratos G, Hiratzka LF, Jacobs AK, Russell RO, Smith SC, Klein WW, Alonso-Garcia A, Blomström-Lundqvist C, De Backer G, Flather M, Hradec J, Oto A, Parkhomenko A, Silber S, Torbicki A. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation31This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in August 2001, the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in August 2001, and the European Society of Cardiology Board and Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences in August 2001.32When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology would appreciate the following citation format: Fuster V, Rydén LE, Asinger RW, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Frye RL, Halperin JL, Kay GN, Klein WW, Lévy S, McNamara RL, Prystowsky EN, Wann LS, Wyse DG. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:XX-XX.33This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org), the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org), the European Society of Cardiology (www.escardio.org), and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (www.naspe.org). Single reprints of this document (the complete Guidelines) to be published in the mid-October issue of the European Heart Journal are available by calling +44.207.424.4200 or +44.207.424.4389, faxing +44.207.424.4433, or writing Harcourt Publishers Ltd, European Heart Journal, ESC Guidelines – Reprints, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BY, United Kingdom. Single reprints of the shorter version (Executive Summary and Summary of Recommendations) published in the October issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology and the October issue of Circulation, are available for $5.00 each by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or by writing the Resource Center, American College of Cardiology, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. To purchase bulk reprints specify version and reprint number (Executive Summary 71-0208; full text 71-0209) up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342; or E-mail: pubauth@heart.org. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01586-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
37
|
Tendera M, Wnuk-Wojnar AM, Kulakowski P, Malolepszy J, Kozlowski JW, Krzeminska-Pakula M, Szechinski J, Droszcz W, Kawecka-Jaszcz K, Swiatecka G, Ruzyllo W, Graff O. Efficacy and safety of dofetilide in the prevention of symptomatic episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: a 6-month double-blind comparison with propafenone and placebo. Am Heart J 2001; 142:93-8. [PMID: 11431663 DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2001.115439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing drug therapies for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) have potentially serious adverse effects. Dofetilide, a pure class III antiarrhythmic agent, may offer an effective and safe alternative for treating PSVT. This study compared the efficacy and safety of dofetilide with that of propafenone and placebo in the prevention of PSVT. METHODS This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared the effectiveness of oral dofetilide 500 microg given twice daily with that of propafenone 150 mg given 3 times a day and placebo in preventing the recurrence of PSVT in 122 symptomatic patients. Episodes of PSVT were documented by symptom diaries and Hertcard (Hertford Medical, Hertfordshire, UK) event recorders. RESULTS After 6 months of treatment, patients taking dofetilide, propafenone, and placebo had a 50%, 54%, and 6% probability, respectively, of remaining free of episodes of PSVT (P <.001 for both dofetilide and propafenone vs placebo). Both dofetilide and propafenone also decreased the frequency of episodes of PSVT; the median numbers of episodes in the dofetilide- and propafenone-treated groups were 1 and 0.5, respectively, compared with 5 in the placebo-treated group. Dofetilide was well tolerated; no proarrhythmia occurred. Three patients taking propafenone had serious treatment-related adverse effects that required drug discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Dofetilide and propafenone were equally effective in preventing the recurrence of or decreasing the frequency of PSVT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tendera
- 3rd Department of Cardiology, Silesian Medical Academy, Katowice, Poland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
In the past 2 years, significant advances have been made in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), antiarrhythmic agents are increasingly being used as adjunct therapy to decrease the frequency of ICD discharges. Sotalol was recently shown to be effective in reducing tachyarrhythmias in patients with ICDs. Intravenous amiodarone is being used for the acute treatment of unstable ventricular arrhythmia and is being investigated for the treatment of acute out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Class III agents are increasingly being used for prophylaxis in patients who have atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, and data point to an important role for these agents in reducing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery. Future studies will need to directly compare these agents with pure anti-adrenergic maneuvers in postoperative patients. In addition to terminating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, ibutilide significantly reduces human atrial defibrillation thresholds and increases the percentage of patients who can be cardioverted from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. The US Food and Drug Administration is expected to approve dofetilide for clinical use soon, and it is currently reviewing azimilide (which seems to be devoid of frequency-dependent effects on repolarization) for prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Dronedarone, tedisamal, and trecetilide are now under active study intended to determine their usefulness in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Experimental studies are ongoing to identify pharmacologic agents that will selectively prolong repolarization in the atria without exerting electrophysiologic effects in the ventricles.
Collapse
|
39
|
Singh BN, Mody FV, Lopez B, Sarma JS. Antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation: focus on prolonging atrial repolarization. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84:161R-173R. [PMID: 10568677 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00718-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the subject of considerable attention and intensive clinical research in recent years. Current opinion among physicians on the management of AF favors the restoration and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. This has several potential benefits, including the alleviation of arrhythmia-associated symptoms, hemodynamic improvements, and possibly a reduced risk of thromboembolic events. After normal sinus rhythm has been restored, antiarrhythmic therapy is necessary to reduce the frequency of AF recurrence. In the selection of an antiarrhythmic agent, both efficacy and safety should be taken into consideration. Many antiarrhythmic agents have the capacity to provoke proarrhythmia, which may result in an increase in mortality. This is of particular concern with sodium-channel blockers in the context of patients with structural heart disease. Flecainide and propafenone are well tolerated and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients without significant cardiac disease but with AF. Recent interest has focused on the use of class III antiarrhythmic agents, such as amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide (recently approved), ibutilide (approved for chemical conversion of AF and atrial flutter), and azimilide (still to be approved) in patients with AF and structural heart disease. To date, amiodarone and sotalol still hold the greatest interest, and although controlled clinical trials with these agents have been few, a number are in progress and some have been recently completed. These agents are effective in maintaining normal sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF and are associated with a low incidence of proarrhythmia when used appropriately. Because of the relative paucity of placebo-controlled trials of antiarrhythmic agents in patients with AF, experience until recently has tended to dictate treatment decisions. Increasingly, selection of drug therapy is being based on a careful and individualized benefit-risk evaluation by means of controlled clinical trials, an approach that is likely to dominate the overall approach to the control of atrial fibrillation in the largest numbers of cases of the arrhythmia. Pharmacologic therapy is likely to be dominated by compounds that exert their predominant effect by prolonging atrial repolarization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B N Singh
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center of West Los Angeles and University of California at Los Angeles, 90073, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
de Paola AA, Veloso HH. Efficacy and safety of sotalol versus quinidine for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation. SOCESP Investigators. The Cardiology Society of São Paulo. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84:1033-7. [PMID: 10569659 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00494-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of sotalol and quinidine after conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) of <6 months, a prospective multicenter trial enrolled 121 patients who were randomized to receive dl-sotalol (160 to 320 mg/day, 58 patients) or quinidine sulfate (600 to 800 mg/day, 63 patients). Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of <0.40 or left atrial diameter >5.2 cm were excluded. After 6 months of follow-up, using the Kaplan-Meier method, the probabilities of success were comparable between sotalol (74%) and quinidine (68%), but recurrences occurred later with sotalol than with quinidine (69 vs 10 days, p <0.05). Four patients developed proarrhythmic events, 3 (5%) with sotalol and 1 (2%) with quinidine, which were all associated with diuretic therapy. In patients converted from recent-onset AF (< or = 72 hours), sotalol was more effective than quinidine (93% vs 64%, p = 0.01), whereas in chronic AF (> 72 hours), quinidine was more effective than sotalol (68% vs 33%, p <0.05). During recurrences, the ventricular rate was significantly reduced in patients taking sotalol (98 to 82 beats/min, p <0.05). Independent predictors of therapeutic success were recent-onset AF in the sotalol group (p <0.001) and absence of hypertension in the quinidine group (p <0.05). In conclusion, sotalol and quinidine have comparable efficacy and safety for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in the overall group. In recent-onset AF, sotalol was more effective, whereas in chronic AF, quinidine had a better result. Recurrences occurred later with sotalol when compared with quinidine. Because of proarrhythmia, these drugs should be used judiciously in patients on diuretic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A de Paola
- Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Department of São Paulo Hospital, Federal University of São Paulo-Paulista School of Medicine, Brazil.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Benditt DG, Williams JH, Jin J, Deering TF, Zucker R, Browne K, Chang-Sing P, Singh BN. Maintenance of sinus rhythm with oral d,l-sotalol therapy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. d,l-Sotalol Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Study Group. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84:270-7. [PMID: 10496434 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00275-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
Currently d,l-sotalol is widely used to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter, although a randomized dose-response study has not previously been conducted to guide therapy for this indication. This study summarizes findings of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the efficacy, safety, and dose-response relation of 3 fixed doses of d,l-sotalol (80, 120, and 160 mg twice daily) for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in 253 patients with atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. All patients were in sinus rhythm at randomization. Treatment (69 patients on placebo, 59 on 80 mg, 63 on 120 mg, and 62 on 160 mg given twice daily) was continued for 12 months or until documented recurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring was used to detect symptomatic recurrences. Demographic characteristics were not different in the 4 groups. Structural heart disease was present in 57% of patients. Patients with a history of heart failure were excluded. The time from randomization to symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence was significantly longer in the 2 higher d,l-sotalol dose groups than in the placebo group. The median times to recurrence were 27, 106, 229, and 175 days for the placebo, 80, 120, and 160 mg groups, respectively. There were no deaths or cases of torsade de pointes, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation reported. Thus, d,l-sotalol appeared to be both safe and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Further, the 120-mg twice daily dose appeared to provide the most favorable benefit and/or risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Benditt
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Center at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Steeds RP, Birchall AS, Smith M, Channer KS. An open label, randomised, crossover study comparing sotalol and atenolol in the treatment of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart 1999; 82:170-5. [PMID: 10409530 PMCID: PMC1729147 DOI: 10.1136/hrt.82.2.170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare sotalol and atenolol in the treatment of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. DESIGN Prospective, randomised, open label, crossover study. SETTING University hospital. PATIENTS 47 subjects aged over 50 years were recruited from the hospital outpatient department following ECG documentation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation that coincided with symptoms. Six patients withdrew and 41 completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomised to one month's treatment with sotalol 80 mg twice daily or atenolol 50 mg once daily. Treatment arms were then crossed over. Patients underwent 72 hour Holter monitoring before randomisation and repeat studies were carried out at the end of both treatment periods. Symptom assessments were completed using linear analogue scales and the Nottingham health profile. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Frequency of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; secondary outcome measures included average and total duration of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, total ectopic count, and symptom assessments. RESULTS A reduction in the number and duration of episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was noted following treatment with sotalol and atenolol. There was no difference in frequency of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during treatment with sotalol or atenolol (median difference 0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0 to 1; p = 0.47). There was no difference in total duration of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (median difference 0 min; 95% CI -1 to 2; p = 0. 51) or in average duration (median difference 0 min; 95% CI 0 to 1; p = 0.31). No difference was found in total ectopic count between sotalol and atenolol (median difference -123; 95% CI -362 to 135; p = 0.14). Treatments were equally tolerated with no difference in linear analogue scores for symptoms of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (median difference -5; 95% CI -20 to 5; p = 0.26) or in all categories of the Nottingham health profile. CONCLUSIONS No difference was found in terms of ECG or symptomatic control of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation between prescribing sotalol 80 mg twice daily and atenolol 50 mg once daily. There was an improvement in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from baseline following treatment with either sotalol or atenolol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R P Steeds
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Murgatroyd FD, Gibson SM, Baiyan X, O'Nunain S, Poloniecki JD, Ward DE, Malik M, Camm AJ. Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of digoxin in symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1999; 99:2765-70. [PMID: 10351970 DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.99.21.2765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digoxin is commonly prescribed in symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) but has never been evaluated in this condition. METHODS AND RESULTS From a multicenter registry, 43 representative patients with frequent symptomatic AF episodes were recruited into a randomized, double-blind crossover comparison of digoxin (serum concentration, 1.29+/-0.35 nmol/L) and placebo. The study end point was the occurrence of 2 AF episodes (documented by patient-activated monitors), censored at 61 days. The median time to 2 episodes was 13.5 days on placebo and 18.7 days on digoxin (P<0. 05). The relative risk (95% CI) of 2 episodes (placebo:digoxin) was 2.19 (1.07 to 4.50). A similar effect was seen on the median time to 1 episode: increased from 3.5 to 5.4 days (P<0.05), relative risk 1. 69 (0.88 to 3.24). The mean+/-SD ventricular rates during AF recordings during placebo and digoxin treatment were 138+/-32 and 125+/-35 bpm, respectively (P<0.01). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory ECG recordings did not show significant differences in the frequency or duration of AF or in ventricular rate. CONCLUSIONS Digoxin reduces the frequency of symptomatic AF episodes. However, the estimated effect is small and may be due to a reduction in the ventricular rate or irregularity rather than an antiarrhythmic action.
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of antiarrhythmic drug therapy continues to undergo major changes. The change is necessitated by the advent of invasive interventional procedures, such as catheter ablation of arrhythmias and the use of implantable devices for sensing and terminating life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and symptomatically traublesome supraventricular arrhythmias. Many conventional and time-honored drugs, such as sodium channel blockers, have been found either to be ineffective or to have the potential to produce serious proarrhythmic reactions. Attention is therefore focused on compounds that prolong repolarization and reduce sympathetic stimulation. Two compounds, amiodarone and sotalol, have emerged as prototypes of drugs of the future. METHODS AND RESULTS: This review focuses on sotalol for controlling supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Sotalol is a major antiarrhythmic agent that combines potent class III action with nonselective beta-blocking properties. The drug's pharmacokinetics is simple. Its elimination half-life is 10-15 hours, the drug being excreted almost exclusively by the kidneys. Sotalol's pharmacokinetics allows development of optimal dosing for initiation of therapy relative to changes in creatinine clearance with further dose adjustment by monitoring the QT interval on the surface electrocardiogram. The compound exerts broad-spectrum antiarrhythmic actions in supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. It prevents inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in approximately 30% of patients with a higher figure for the suppression of spontaneously occurring arrhythmias documented on Holter recordings. CONCLUSIONS: The major role of sotalol is in the management of VT/VF often in conjunction with an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator, in which context it lowere the defibrillation threshold. Sotalol is superior to class I agents, especially in VT/VF and in survivors of cardiac arrest. Sotalol has emerged as a major antifibrillatory compound for the control of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias as the main indication. Data have indicated its potential for the maintenance of stability of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter after electrical conversion and in preventing their occurrence in a variety of clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- BN Singh
- UCLA School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center of West Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|