Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and restenosis after coronary angioplasty in unstable angina pectoris

Influence of the angiotensin converting enzyme insertion or deletion genetic variant and coronary restenosis risk: evidence based on 11,193 subjects

The insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the gene encoding angiotensin converting enzyme is a controversial risk factor for restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCA) in patients. Genetic association studies can be problematic to reproduce due to insufficient power, phenotypic heterogeneity, population stratification, small effect of the variant and even publication biases. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship as well as to quantify the between-study heterogeneity and potential bias, a meta-analysis including 11,193 patients from 33 published cohort studies was performed. In a combined analysis, the summary per-allele odds ratio for restenosis was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.08-1.58, P = 0.006), and 1.22 (95% CI: 0.95-1.56, P = 0.12), for PTCA-stent and PTCA-balloon, respectively. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased restenosis risks after PTCA-stent were found in Asians for the polymorphism; whereas no significant associations were found among Caucasians. As for restenosis risks after PTCA-balloon, no evidence of any gene-disease association was obtained in the stratified analyses according to ethnicity and study size. In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrated that the DD homozygous of ACE I/D polymorphism was significantly associated with elevated restenosis susceptibility after PTCA-stent among Asian populations.

Genetic polymorphism of angiotensin converting enzyme and risk of coronary restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties: evidence from 33 cohort studies

Background

In the past decade, a number of cohort studies studies have been carried out to investigate the relationship between the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the gene encoding angiotensin-converting enzyme and risk of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties in patients. However, these studies have yielded contradictory results. Genetic association studies addressing this issue are frequently hampered by insufficient power. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of the published studies to clarify this inconsistency and to establish a comprehensive picture of the relationship between ACE I/D polymorphism and post-PTCA restenosis risk.

Methods

Databases including Pubmed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane Library databases and CNKI were searched to find relevant studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. The random-effects model was applied, addressing heterogeneity and publication bias.

Results

A total of 33 cohort studies involving 11,099 subjects were included. In a combined analysis, the OR for post-PTCA restenosis of the ACE DD genotype was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.27–2.04; P<10⁻⁵). In the subgroup analysis by intervention, significantly increased risks were also found in PTCA-stent and PTCA-balloon for the DD genotype of the polymorphism.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis showed that the DD genotype of ACE I/D polymorphism was significantly associated with increased risk of restenosis, particularly for PTCA-stent.

ACE (I/D) polymorphism and response to treatment in coronary artery disease: a comprehensive database and meta-analysis involving study quality evaluation

BACKGROUND

The role of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism in modifying the response to treatment modalities in coronary artery disease is controversial.

METHODS

PubMed was searched and a database of 58 studies with detailed information regarding ACE I/D polymorphism and response to treatment in coronary artery disease was created. Eligible studies were synthesized using meta-analysis methods, including cumulative meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and study quality issues were explored.

RESULTS

Forty studies involved invasive treatments (coronary angioplasty or coronary artery by-pass grafting) and 18 used conservative treatment options (including anti-hypertensive drugs, lipid lowering therapy and cardiac rehabilitation procedures). Clinical outcomes were investigated by 11 studies, while 47 studies focused on surrogate endpoints. The most studied outcome was the restenosis following coronary angioplasty (34 studies). Heterogeneity among studies (p < 0.01) was revealed and the risk of restenosis following balloon angioplasty was significant under an additive model: the random effects odds ratio was 1.42 (95% confidence interval:1.07-1.91). Cumulative meta-analysis showed a trend of association as information accumulates. The results were affected by population origin and study quality criteria. The meta-analyses for the risk of restenosis following stent angioplasty or after angioplasty and treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors produced non-significant results. The allele contrast random effects odds ratios with the 95% confidence intervals were 1.04(0.92-1.16) and 1.10(0.81-1.48), respectively. Regarding the effect of ACE I/D polymorphism on the response to treatment for the rest outcomes (coronary events, endothelial dysfunction, left ventricular remodeling, progression/regression of atherosclerosis), individual studies showed significance; however, results were discrepant and inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

In view of available evidence, genetic testing of ACE I/D polymorphism prior to clinical decision making is not currently justified. The relation between ACE genetic variation and response to treatment in CAD remains an unresolved issue. The results of long-term and properly designed prospective studies hold the promise for pharmacogenetically tailored therapy in CAD.

Present status of outcome prediction of invasive coronary treatment by using genetic markers

A growing number of studies suggest that the outcome after invasive coronary treatment may be in part genetically determined. Here, we review the present status of outcome prediction of invasive coronary treatments by using genetic markers. Although some studies found an association between one or another genetic marker with one or another clinical endpoint, many other studies found no such relations; to date, none of the genetic markers that have been investigated in association studies are used in routine clinical practice to prospectively assess the prognosis following invasive coronary treatment or to decide upon therapeutic strategies. Many associations between genetic markers and certain clinical endpoints were initially reported in small studies but could not be confirmed in larger ones. Some of these discrepancies may be explained by publication bias. Some genetic variants may have true effects on clinical endpoints, which, albeit biologically interesting, do not bear much clinical relevance. On the other hand, many-if not most-studies that have been published to date are more or less grossly underpowered and very rarely report on the results of an a priori power analysis. Thus, there is still a need for further high-quality studies designed to investigate the specific contribution of genetic factors to the outcome after invasive coronary interventions.

A meta-analysis of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization: evidence for publication bias

BACKGROUND

The insertion/deletion polymorphism of the gene encoding angiotensin-converting enzyme is a controversial risk factor for restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization in patients. Genetic association studies addressing this issue are frequently hampered by insufficient power. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of this association, taking into account the possibility of publication bias.

METHODS

We used the MEDLINE database and reviewed citations in relevant articles to identify 12 studies. Information on the design of the studies, the detailed genotype distribution, the angiographic follow-up rate, and the restenosis rate were categorized by use of a standardized protocol.

RESULTS

Overall, DD (deletion-deletion) homozygotes had a higher restenosis risk than II (insertion-insertion) carriers (odds ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44, P <.05). However, the published studies were significantly heterogeneous, especially those addressing in-stent restenosis. Smaller studies tended to have positive results more frequently, which is characteristic of publication bias. Correcting for publication bias, we estimated the odds ratio to be 1.15 (95% CI 0.98-1.32, not significant). None of the published studies met all rules of genetic epidemiology.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that a clinically significant association of the angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism with restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularization in patients is unlikely. This meta-analysis provides evidence that the pooled estimate based on published literature, which favors an association, is distorted by publication bias. Hence, screening for this mutation in clinical practice is not justified. Future research should preferentially focus on gene-gene interaction and comply with the rules of genetic epidemiology.

Angiotensin converting enzyme insertion or deletion polymorphism and coronary restenosis: meta-analysis of 16 studies

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between genotype at the insertion or deletion polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme gene and risk of coronary restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of studies before July 2001 that reported on these genotypes and risk of coronary restenosis after a percutaneous coronary intervention, with or without coronary stenting.

RESULTS

16 studies, involving 4631 patients undergoing a percutaneous coronary intervention, yielded 1683 patients with restenosis after a mean weighted follow up of 5.5 months. The combined odds ratio for restenosis in people with the DD genotype was 1.23 (99% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.46). When studies were grouped by size, however, the combined odds ratios for restenosis in people with the DD genotype were 1.94 (1.39 to 2.71) for studies with less than 100 cases, 1.33 (0.92 to 1.93) for studies with 100-200 cases, and 0.92 (0.72 to 1.18) for studies with more than 200 cases (trend P=0.02). Similarly, when studies were grouped by genotyping procedures, significantly larger odds ratios were found in the studies that did not conceal disease status from laboratory staff and in the studies that did not use a second polymerase chain reaction amplification to reduce genetic mistyping.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other studies, larger and more rigorous studies show a weaker association between the angiotensin converting enzyme gene DD genotype and restenosis. Publication bias or detection biases can produce artefactual associations at least as large as those that might be expected for common polymorphisms in complex diseases, suggesting the need for larger and more rigorous genetic epidemiological investigations than are now customary.

Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist gene polymorphism and restenosis after coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is limited by the recurrence of luminal stenosis, which occurs in up to 50% of procedures. It has been shown that patient specific factors, perhaps genes, contribute to this process.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether completion of healing after PTCA is part of an acute self limiting inflammatory process and whether polymorphism at important inflammatory gene loci might determine susceptibility to restenosis after PTCA.

DESIGN

DNA samples were collected from 171 patients attending for elective PTCA in Sheffield (S) and Leicester (L), who were scheduled to undergo follow up angiography (at four months (L) or six months (S)) as part of other restenosis studies. At follow up angiography, the patients were separated into restenosers (> 50% luminal narrowing) and non-restenosers (< 50% luminal narrowing). Four DNA polymorphisms within interleukin 1 (IL-1) related loci (IL-1A (-889), IL-1B (-511), IL-1B (+3954), and IL-1RN intron 2 VNTR (variable number tandem repeat)) were genotyped using methods based on polymerase chain reaction. Significance was assessed by chi(2) analysis of the relevant contingency table, and the magnitude of effect was estimated by calculating odds ratios. The Mantel-Haenszel (MH) test was applied to summarise data across the two populations.

RESULTS

Allele 2 at IL-1RN (IL-1RN*2) was significantly over represented in the non-restenoser group (L+S, 34% v 23% in restenosers). Furthermore, IL-1RN*2 homozygosity was increased in the non-restenoser population compared with the restenosers (MH test: p = 0.0196 (L+S); p = 0.031 (L+S, single vessel disease only), and the effect seemed to be restricted to the single vessel disease subpopulation. For other polymorphism within IL-1 related loci no significant associations were found with either restenosis or non-restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-1RN*2 may be associated with protection from restenosis after PTCA for individuals with single vessel disease. As this polymorphism has functional significance, this finding suggests that alteration in an individual's inflammatory predisposition may modulate the blood vessel response to injury.

Ace D/I polymorphism and incidence of post-PTCA restenosis: a prospective, angiography-based evaluation

Early restenosis is the major complication of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), occurring in approximately 30% of all initially successful procedures. The D/I polymorphism of the ACE gene, which has variably been reported to represent a risk factor for manifestations of ischemic heart disease, has recently been implicated in the pathophysiology of restenosis after PTCA by some investigators but not by others. All studies conducted thus far involved relatively small sample sizes. We investigated the possible association of ACE D/I genotype and post-PTCA restenosis in a large, prospective sample of patients followed by quantitative coronary angiography. The ACE D/I gene polymorphism was characterized in a cohort of 779 patients, of whom 342 (cases) had developed restenosis (as defined by >50% loss of lumen compared with immediate postprocedure results) at repeat quantitative coronary angiography at 6 months after PTCA. Allele frequencies for the ACE D and I: alleles were 0.58 and 0.42 in cases and 0.58 and 0.42 in control subjects. All observed genotype frequencies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. There was no evidence for an association between genotype and restenosis or degree of lumen loss. The data from this largest study of its kind conducted so far provide no evidence for an association of the ACE D/I allelic polymorphism with incidence of restenosis after PTCA. On the basis of the power of this study, we conclude that in a general population, the ACE D/I polymorphism is not a useful marker to assess risk of post-PTCA restenosis.

The Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism of the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Gene and the Risk for Restenosis After PTCA

The therapeutic benefit of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is limited by restenosis in about 30% of patients. The underlying mechanisms are currently not well understood. Besides clinical and angiographic variables, genetic factors may be involved. We determined the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) I/D genotype as a possible risk factor for restenosis in 511 consecutive patients who had undergone successful PTCA and follow-up angiography. Clinical and angiographic variables were also considered as possible predictors of restenosis. One hundred sixty patients had restenosis as defined by a greater than 50% progression of residual stenosis of the dilated segment at follow-up angiography. There were significantly more patients with the ACE DD genotype in the restenosis than in the no-restenosis group. This difference did not remain statistically significant in an analysis of covariance that included genetic and clinical variables. Patients who subsequently developed restenosis had a higher degree of stenosis and more severe lesions before PTCA as well as less residual stenosis immediately after PTCA. We conclude that the ACE DD genotype is not an independent risk factor for restenosis after PTCA.

ACE gene polymorphism in cardiovascular disease: meta-analyses of small and large studies in whites

The objective of this study was to assess the influence of the ACE gene insertion (I)/deletion (D) polymorphism on plasma ACE activity; blood pressure; and risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and ischemic cerebrovascular disease by comparing small and large studies. The meta-analyses are based on a literature search of MEDLINE up until April 1998 and assessment of bibliographies of published studies and reviews. Forty-six studies were selected, including a total of 32 715 white individuals. Plasma ACE activity was increased 40% and 71% for ID and DD versus II in small studies and 21% and 48% in large studies (small versus large: P<0.001 and P<0.001). Blood pressure was not influenced by genotype. Risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease was increased by 47% and 29%, respectively, for DD versus ID and II genotypes in small studies but not in large studies (small versus large: P<0.001 for risk of myocardial infarction and P=0.01 for risk of ischemic heart disease). Risk of ischemic cerebrovascular disease was not increased either in the small or in the largest study. In conclusion, the ACE gene polymorphism affects plasma ACE activity but not blood pressure and is not associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, or ischemic cerebrovascular disease in the largest studies.

Pharmacogenetic analysis of the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are reported to prevent neointimal formation after balloon injury in animal models, but in most prospective studies in humans, ACE inhibitors failed to prevent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The ACE genotype assigned by an insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism is known to affect the potency of ACE inhibitors in several renal diseases. The authors attempted to clarify whether the effect of ACE inhibitors on restenosis might be modified by the ACE genotype. A total of 126 patients was randomly and prospectively assigned to the control group and the imidapril group. In the imidapril group, patients received 5 mg imidapril daily, starting 1 day before PTCA and continuing for 3 to 6 months. Forty-six control (65 vessels) and 32 imidapril patients (43 vessels) completed the study. The minimal lumen diameter before and after the procedure did not differ significantly among the groups with the three genotypes (II, ID, and DD) in both the control and imidapril groups. Late luminal loss during the follow-up period was not related to the ACE genotype in the control group but was significantly related in the imidapril group (II, 0.63+/- 0.19 mm; ID + DD, 1.12+/-0.14 mm, p<0.05). Furthermore, in the II genotype, imidapril significantly reduced late loss and restenosis rate as defined by most of the frequently used definitions. In conclusion the ACE I/D polymorphism may influence the effect of ACE inhibitors in preventing restenosis after PTCA.

[D/D genotype of the gene for angiotensin converting enzyme as a risk factor for post-stent coronary restenosis]

INTRODUCTION

Although intracoronary stenting has decreased restenosis rate compared to percutaneous balloon angioplasty, still a high number of patients develop in-stent restenosis, which is an entity primarily due to tissue proliferation. Experimental studies have indicated that the renin-angiotensin system is involved in neointimal hyperplasia. Plasma and cellular levels of ACE are associated with an I/D polymorphism in the ACE gene. Indeed, DD subjects have the higher ACE levels. The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility that the I/D polymorphism might be related with in-stent restenosis.

METHODS

We studied the ACE polymorphism in 48 consecutive patients who underwent successful implantation of an elective coronary stent in native coronary vessels and had a 6 month angiographic follow up. Restenosis (50% of the reference vessel) was observed in 23/48 patients. Patients with or without restenosis did not differ in demographic or clinical variables like diabetes, plasma cholesterol levels or in quantitative angiographic parameters such as vessel reference size or minimal lumen diameter after stent implantation.

RESULTS

I/D polymorphism was distributed as follows: 22.9% of the patients were D/D; 14.5% were I/I and 62.5% of the patients were heterozygous I/D. The presence of restenosis was strongly related with the I/D polymorphism: 81.8% of the patients with D/D genotype had restenosis, compared with 40.0% of I/D patients and only 14.2% of the I/I patients (chi 2 p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this limited cohort, homocygous D/D of the ACE gene was significantly associated with in-stent restenosis, whereas restenosis was infrequent in patients with the I/I genotype.

Angiotensin I-converting enzyme genotype influences arterial response to injury in normotensive rats

Two normotensive strains of rat, the Lou and Brown Norway (BN) strains, have contrasting levels of plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). To investigate the degree of genetic determination of ACE expression, a polymorphic marker of the ACE gene was analyzed in inbred rats of the two strains. The two inbred strains were shown to bear different alleles for a polymorphic marker at the ACE gene. The segregation of the alleles of this marker and the plasma ACE levels were studied in a group of F2 rats issued from a cross between Lou and BN rats. The degree of genetic determination of plasma ACE activity was estimated to be 94% in the F2 cohort. The ACE locus accounts for 74% of total plasma ACE variance. ACE activity and mRNA expression in lungs were also genetically determined. The difference observed in ACE mRNA accumulation in the lungs between the two strains was due to a difference in the transcriptional rate of the ACE gene, as shown in nuclear run-on experiments. No differences were observed in arterial blood pressure of homozygous F2 progeny. In these animals, ACE genotype did not interfere with the pressor or the depressor responses to ACE-dependent vasoactive peptides. There was a significant effect of strain on constitutive or inducible membrane or soluble ACE activity in primary cultures of vascular cells. Neointima formation in the carotid artery 14 days after balloon injury was also influenced by the genotype in F2 homozygous progeny, whereas the medial area was not. These results demonstrate that there is a close relationship between the genetically determined ACE expression and the inducibility of the ACE gene. The degree of genetic determination of ACE expression in inbred rat strains offers a unique opportunity to study the interaction between genetic and environmental determinants of ACE expression and its involvement in response to experimental cardiovascular and renal injury.

Plasma activity and insertion/deletion polymorphism of angiotensin I-converting enzyme: a major risk factor and a marker of risk for coronary stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

Tissue proliferation is almost invariably observed in recurrent lesions within stents, and ACE, a factor of smooth muscle cell proliferation, may play an important role. Plasma ACE level is largely controlled by the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the enzyme gene. The association among restenosis within coronary stents, plasma ACE level, and the I/D polymorphism is analyzed in the present prospective study.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred seventy-six consecutive patients with successful, high-pressure, elective stenting of de novo lesions in the native coronary vessels were considered. At follow-up angiography, recurrence was observed in 35 patients (19.9%). Baseline clinical and demographic variables, plasma glucose and serum fibrinogen levels, lipid profile, descriptive and quantitative angiographic data, and procedural variables were not significantly different in patients with and without restenosis; mean plasma ACE levels (+/-SEM) were 40.8+/-3.5 and 20.7+/-1.0 U/L, respectively (P<.0001). Diameter stenosis percentage and minimum luminal diameter at 6 months showed statistically significant correlation with plasma ACE level (r=.352 and -.387, respectively P<.001). Twenty-one of 62 patients (33.9%) with D/D genotype, 13 of 80 (16.3%) with I/D genotype, and 1 of 34 (2.9%) with I/I genotype showed recurrence; the restenosis rate for each genotype is consistent with a codominant expression of the allele D.

CONCLUSIONS

In a selected cohort of patients, both the D/D genotype of the ACE gene, and high plasma activity of the enzyme are significantly associated with in-stent restenosis. Continued study with clinically different subsets of patients and various stent designs is warranted.

The deletion/insertion polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme gene and cardiovascular-renal risk

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis attempted to derive pooled estimates for the associations between various cardiovascular-renal disorders and the deletion/insertion (D/I) polymorphism of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene.

METHODS

Case-control studies were combined, using the Mantel-Haenszel approach. Joint P values for continuous variables were calculated by Stouffer's method. Continuous measurements reported in different units were expressed on a percentage scale using the within-study mean of the II genotype as the denominator.

RESULTS

The computerized database used for this analysis included 145 reports with an overall sample size of 49 959 subjects. Overall, possession of the D allele was associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic and renal microvascular complications. In comparison with the II reference group, the excess risk in DD homozygotes (P < 0.001) was 32% for coronary heart disease (CHD; 30 studies), 45% for myocardial infarction (20 studies), 94% for stroke (five studies) and 56% for diabetic nephropathy (11 studies). The corresponding risk in DI heterozygotes amounted to 11% (P= 0.02), 13% (P= 0.02), 22% (P= 0.10) and 40% (P < 0.001), respectively. Hypertension (23 studies), left ventricular hypertrophy (five studies), hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy (eight studies) and diabetic retinopathy (two studies) were not related to the DI polymorphism. Publication bias was observed for CHD, myocardial infarction and microvascular nephropathy, but not hypertension. In studies with DNA amplification in the presence of insertion-specific primers, the risk associated with the DD genotype increased to 150% [95% confidence interval (CI) 76-256; four studies] for diabetic nephropathy, but decreased to 12% (95% CI -3 to 28; seven studies) for CHD and 14% (95% CI -6 to 37; four studies) for myocardial infarction. On the other hand, the pooled odds ratios did not materially change if the meta-analysis was limited to articles published in journals with an impact factor of at least 4. Furthermore, compared with the II control group, the circulating ACE levels (29 studies) were raised 58 and 31% (P < 0.001) in DD and DI subjects, respectively. In contrast, plasma renin (10 studies), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (46 studies) and body mass index (30 studies) were not associated with the D allele.

CONCLUSION

The D allele is not associated with hypertension, but behaves as a marker of atherosclerotic cardiovascular complications and diabetic nephropathy. These associations do not necessarily imply a causal relationship and may have been inflated by publication bias. Nevertheless, their possible therapeutic implications may be subject to further investigation in prospective (intervention) studies.